$99 for your first yearFT newspaper delivered Monday-Saturday, plus FT Digital Edition delivered to your device Monday-Saturday.What’s included Weekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysis More
$99 for your first yearFT newspaper delivered Monday-Saturday, plus FT Digital Edition delivered to your device Monday-Saturday.What’s included Weekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysis More
$99 for your first yearFT newspaper delivered Monday-Saturday, plus FT Digital Edition delivered to your device Monday-Saturday.What’s included Weekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysis More
Unlock the Editor’s Digest for freeRoula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.European companies are bracing for a financial hit from a potential trade war with the US, with some top executives warning that uncertainty over Donald Trump’s trade policy is already affecting investment plans.The US president delayed steep tariffs against Canada and Mexico earlier this week but still has the EU in his crosshairs, leaving executives guessing as to the scale and impact of any new levies. Markus Krebber, chief executive of Germany’s RWE, one of Europe’s largest power producers, said the threat of tariffs was slowing his group’s investments into wind and solar projects in the US. Potential import duties created huge uncertainty over “what you can get into the US”, Krebber told a conference this week. Intermediate goods such as rotor blades and batteries “need to be imported because there is not yet local manufacturing” of them in the US, he added. Some companies, including luxury goods group LVMH and oil major Shell, were considering increasing their US presence. But Krebber said: “Our big customers are all telling the [Trump] administration that it needs to ensure certainty pretty soon, because otherwise, actually, they achieve the opposite of what they want.” Analysts at Goldman Sachs said in a note that it was “not necessarily the tariffs themselves that matter, rather the trade uncertainty that hits economic growth and investment intentions”. The bank is already expecting some impact from trade barriers, with its equity team projecting European earnings per share growth at just 3 per cent in 2025 — well below analysts’ consensus forecasts. Some content could not load. Check your internet connection or browser settings.The EU is preparing to offer concessions to avert a trade war with Trump, who has complained that Europeans “don’t buy our cars, they don’t take our farm products, they take almost nothing and we take everything from them”.The bloc accounts for approximately 15 per cent of US imports, with machinery, pharmaceuticals and chemicals among its top exports to America. Europe’s automotive sector is also exposed to tariffs, especially if the EU retaliates with levies on US goods. “The big question is what happens if those tariffs come in between the US and Europe,” said Jim Rowan, chief executive of Volvo Cars. Although it would be “manageable” if the US raised tariffs on EU goods from 2.5 per cent to 10 per cent, a bigger margin would force the company to increase production at its plant in South Carolina, Rowan said this week. The Swedish group this week warned of lower profitability this year, in part due to tariff uncertainty. French drinks group Pernod Ricard also said it could be hit. London-listed drinks conglomerate Diageo forecast a $200mn knock to operating profits by June if Trump carried out his threatened 25 per cent levy on Mexican and Canadian imports. Jan Rindbo, chief executive of Danish commodities shipping group Norden, warned that if the EU retaliated against US tariffs with levies of its own, then companies would be “hit twice”. A trade war could lead to EU companies importing some goods from further afield, such as from South America, he added. Although demand for a wider range of shipments would be positive for the shipping sector, overall it could mean that the “US economy will get hit, that the EU economy will get hit”, he said. Despite the concerns, a number of executives said they had the flexibility to adapt to trade disruption. Energy companies would be able to reroute liquefied natural gas to avoid tariffs imposed on the fuel between the US and China, said Patrick Pouyanné, chief executive of France’s TotalEnergies. “The Chinese are buying energy from companies like Total. In fact, they just asked us, to avoid paying the [tariff], to give them some Australian or Qatari LNG, and we will take the US LNG and send it elsewhere, maybe to Europe,” he told the Financial Times. ArcelorMittal, world’s second biggest steelmaker, played down its exposure to potential US tariffs on Mexico and Canada. The group’s Canadian operation is a critical supplier to the US automotive sector, while its American facilities use semi-finished steel products from Mexico. Genuino Christino, ArcelorMittal’s chief financial officer, said he was “not overly concerned” about the prospect of tariffs. The company, he said, took a hit of about $100mn per quarter in 2018 when Trump last imposed 25 per cent tariffs on steel. The higher costs, however, were offset by higher prices. Micael Johansson, chief executive of Sweden’s defence champion Saab, told the FT: “It’s a bit premature to understand where it is going. Trade wars are never good for anyone.”Reporting by Sylvia Pfeifer, Kana Inagaki, Oliver Telling and Clara Murray in London, Olaf Storbeck in Frankfurt, Ian Johnston in Paris and Richard Milne in Oslo More
$99 for your first yearFT newspaper delivered Monday-Saturday, plus FT Digital Edition delivered to your device Monday-Saturday.What’s included Weekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysis More
Unlock the Editor’s Digest for freeRoula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.US President Donald Trump has temporarily paused measures to close a tariff exemption on low-cost shipments from China while officials figure out how to tax the millions of packages that arrive in the US every day.In an amendment to an executive order signed on Wednesday and published on Friday, the White House said the so-called de minimis provision — which exempts shipments under $800 in value from tariffs and rigorous customs checks — would remain in place until “adequate systems are in place to fully and expediently process and collect tariff revenue”.Trump had cancelled the exemption in an executive order last week that imposed an additional 10 per cent tariff on goods from China, which the White House said was aimed at punishing Beijing for allowing the flow of deadly opioid fentanyl into the US. The rest of the tariffs remain in effect.China retaliated days later, announcing tariffs of 10 to 15 per cent on US liquefied natural gas, coal, crude oil and farm equipment, which are due to take effect from Monday.Trump said on Tuesday that he was in “no rush” to talk to his Chinese counterpart.The de minimis provision was designed to help US households and small businesses purchase low-cost items from abroad without making them subject to onerous customs checks. In recent years, it has proved a boon to ecommerce platforms that ship directly to consumers, such as China’s Shein and Temu.But had analysts warned that the move to cancel the exemption, which came into effect just days after it was announced, would force customs officials to apply the more complicated formal entry process to every package arriving from China.The US Customs and Border Protection estimates that it processes more than 4mn low-value shipments daily. A congressional select committee report in 2023 estimated that about 30 per cent of those packages came from Temu and Shein.The move would also make parcels formerly qualifying for de minimis subject not only to the additional 10 per cent tariff but also to existing trade levies, according to experts.The US Postal Service on Tuesday suspended receipt of packages from China, including Hong Kong, before backtracking one day later to accept shipments. USPS said it was working with customs officials to establish an “efficient collection mechanism”, as the rapid implementation of the directive increased workloads for customs officials and stoked turmoil for exporters and freight carriers.Chinese ecommerce sellers also said this week that some logistics groups were charging them withholding fees to cover the levies and other customs costs.US officials have long had the de minimis rules in their sights. Domestic retailers that purchase items from overseas in bulk have complained that the exemption gave Chinese ecommerce groups an unfair cost advantage. Former US president Joe Biden’s administration had proposed measures to tighten rules concerning the de minimis regime.A report from analysts at Nomura, the Japanese investment bank, estimated that China shipped $46bn worth of packages to the US under de minimis rules in 2024, and that scrapping the exemptions could knock 0.2 percentage points off Chinese economic growth in 2025. More
$99 for your first yearFT newspaper delivered Monday-Saturday, plus FT Digital Edition delivered to your device Monday-Saturday.What’s included Weekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysis More
$99 for your first yearFT newspaper delivered Monday-Saturday, plus FT Digital Edition delivered to your device Monday-Saturday.What’s included Weekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysis More
