More stories

  • in

    Fact-Checking Biden’s and Trump’s Claims About the Economy

    We fact-checked claims about inflation, jobs and tax policy from both presidential candidates.Consumer sentiment about the state of the economy could be pivotal in shaping the 2024 presidential election.President Biden is still grappling with how to address one of his biggest weaknesses: inflation, which has recently cooled but soared in his first years in office. Former President Donald J. Trump’s frequent economic boasts are undermined by the mass job losses and supply chain disruptions wrought by the pandemic.Here’s a fact check of some of their more recent claims about the economy.Both candidates misrepresented inflation.A grocery store in Queens, New York, earlier this year.Hiroko Masuike/The New York TimesWhat Was Said“They had inflation of — the real number, if you really get into the real number, it’s probably 40 percent or 50 percent when you add things up, when you don’t just put in the numbers that they want to hear.”— Mr. Trump at a campaign event in Detroit in June“I think it could be as high as 50 percent if you add everything in, when you start adding energy prices in, when you start adding interest rates.”— Mr. Trump in a June interview on Fox NewsThis is misleading. Karoline Leavitt, a spokeswoman for the Trump campaign, cited a 41 percent increase in energy prices since January 2021, and prices for specific energy costs like gasoline rising more than 50 percent during that time.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    Democrats’ Dream of a Wealth Tax Is Alive. For Now.

    A narrow Supreme Court ruling left the door open for Congress to expand taxes on billionaires, but it’s not a guarantee.For years, liberal Democrats have agitated for the United States to tax wealth, not just income, as a way to ensure that rich Americans who derive wealth from real estate, stocks, bonds and other assets were paying more in taxes.On Thursday, that dream survived a Supreme Court scare, but just barely.Thanks to a narrow court ruling, a raft of plans to use the tax code to address the gaping divide between the very richest Americans and everyone else appear set to live for years to come in the campaign proposals and official budgets of top Democrats.The idea of a wealth tax was not directly before the court on Thursday. Justices were considering the constitutionality of a new tax imposed under former President Donald J. Trump that applies to certain income earned by businesses overseas. But in taking the case, the court could have pre-emptively ruled federal wealth taxation unconstitutional.It did not, and liberal groups celebrated the victory.“The Supreme Court also could have taken an activist turn of the worst kind by pre-emptively ruling federal wealth taxes unconstitutional today,” Amy Hanauer, the executive director of the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, which supports higher taxes on corporations and the wealthy, said in a statement. “To its credit, the court did not do so.”But the case also offered a window into the legal fight to come over various iterations of a wealth tax should Congress ever adopt one. It showed a solid four justices firmly opposed to such a tax — and two more who appeared skeptical.“This is a narrow decision,” Joe Bishop-Henchman, the vice president of the National Taxpayers Union, which opposes wealth tax proposals, said in a statement on Thursday. But, he added, “the court makes clear it is not opening the door to a wealth tax.”We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    New Home Construction Slows as Mortgage Rates Remain High

    Home building in May fell to its slowest pace in four years despite a supply shortage. That trend could put even greater strain on buyers.Construction of new homes in the United States dropped below expectations in May as builders pull back on new residential projects largely in response to high interest rates, reinforcing concerns about stubbornly high housing prices.Government data released on Thursday showed that new-home construction, or housing starts, fell 5.5 percent last month to an annualized rate of 1.28 million, a sign of more cracks in the already shaky housing market. Slower construction of both single-family and multifamily homes contributed to the overall drop. Building permits dipped 3.8 percent, pointing to less future construction.This downturn in home building comes as the average rate on 30-year mortgages, the nation’s most popular home loan, has reached highs not seen in decades, though the rate dipped slightly this week to 6.87 percent, Freddie Mac reported on Thursday.The magnitude of the decrease in construction last month underscores that high interest rates are both weakening housing demand and raising costs for builders — two dynamics that are ultimately contributing to builders’ reluctance to start projects. Home builder sentiment dropped in May to its lowest level this year before falling even further this month, suggesting relatively tepid home construction data in the coming months, Daniel Vielhaber, an economist at Nationwide, said in a statement.The weakening in construction, in turn, is only putting more strain on prospective home buyers.“If you’re a consumer, if you’re someone looking to buy a home, what you ultimately want is a lot more supply,” said Chen Zhao, who leads the housing economics team at the real estate services company Redfin. “The key to having more housing supply is that we need more building. So any time we see that there is less building, that is bad news.”The latest housing construction data, released by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, reinforces that consumers are unlikely to see home prices drop by much over the next couple of years, Ms. Zhao said. The data point, she added, represents “one more factor that would keep home price growth high” because it points to a tighter housing supply in the next year or two.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    The Weird Housing Market, in 5 Charts

    The Housing Market Is Weird and Ugly. These 5 Charts Explain Why.Home prices have held up better than expected amid high interest rates. But that doesn’t mean the housing market is healthy. More

  • in

    IMF chief says Europe looks like ‘an ideas supermarket’ for the U.S., calls for further integration

    Speaking to CNBC’s Karen Tso, IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva said Europe’s economic performance was strengthening and inflation was clearly on a downward trajectory.
    “We come with this relatively good news and with a warning: There is no time to waste for the euro zone to concentrate on productivity,” Georgieva said.
    “Right now, Europe looks like an ideas supermarket for the United States,” she added.

    IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva arrives at a briefing in Washington, D.C., on Friday, April 19, 2024.
    Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    The head of the International Monetary Fund on Thursday called on Europe to achieve the full potential of its prized single market, lamenting what she described as a situation that makes the region look like “an ideas supermarket” for the U.S.
    Speaking to CNBC’s Karen Tso, IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva said Europe’s economic performance was strengthening and inflation was clearly on a downward trajectory.

    Georgieva said that the IMF observing an uptick in consumption and expected interest rate cuts from the European Central Bank spelled out good news for investment in the euro zone. She said it would bolster the 20-member bloc’s economic performance.
    “We come with this relatively good news and with a warning: There is no time to waste for the euro zone to concentrate on productivity,” Georgieva said.
    “That means two things. One, to achieve the full potential of the single market. It is not there yet. We want to see more labor market flexibility in Europe, we want to see [a] deepening [of] the financial markets, integrating them [and] we want to see the banking union, the capital union in place,” she continued.
    “And two, we want to see much more attention to innovation, investing in [research and development], making it possible to have business based on innovation in Europe to materialize in Europe. Right now, Europe looks like an ideas supermarket for the United States,” Georgieva said.

    “A lot of what is invented here ends up being commercially viable and on scale over there and when you look at the main obstacle? 27 countries not yet integrated in a single market.”

    U.S. productivity gap

    The European Union’s single market seeks to guarantee the unrestricted movement of goods, capital, services and labor throughout the territory.
    Established more than 30 years ago, the single market is designed to allow EU citizens to live and work across the EU and to provide consumers with a wider choice of high-quality services and products.
    The IMF believes deeper single-market integration could further boost the region’s economic growth.
    In May, the Washington, D.C.-based institute said in a blog post that an IMF report published in 2023 estimated that reducing remaining barriers to the single market for goods and services by 10% could raise European output by as much as 7 percentage points over the long term.
    “The euro area is now focusing on critical questions for the future. Among them, number one, how to lift up productivity at par with competitors, especially with the U.S.,” Georgieva said.
    The IMF chief reinforced the fund’s growth outlook for the euro zone, saying the bloc was on track to register a growth rate of 0.8% in 2024, compared with 0.4% in 2023 — and increase by 1.5% next year.
    Correction: A previous version of this article misstated the month that the IMF said a 10% reduction would boost European output by up to 7 percentage points. More

  • in

    Bank of England holds rates in ‘finely balanced’ decision; traders up bets on August cut

    The Bank of England voted to hold interest rates at its June meeting, meeting market expectations after U.K. inflation fell to the central bank’s 2% target.
    Traders saw an increased likelihood it may opt for a cut in August, after it described a “finely balanced” decision that saw policymakers divided on the threat of second-round inflationary pressures.
    Ruth Gregory, deputy chief U.K. economist at Capital Economics, said “several developments implied a rate cut is getting closer.”

    General view of the Bank Of England building in London. 
    Sopa Images | Lightrocket | Getty Images

    LONDON — The Bank of England on Thursday opted to keep interest rates steady at its June meeting, but described the decision as “finely balanced” after U.K. inflation hit its 2% target.
    Markets nudged bets on an August rate cut up to nearly 50-50 on what investors perceived as subtly dovish messaging.

    It keeps the central bank’s key rate at a 16-year high of 5.25%, where it has been held since August 2023.
    Seven members of the Monetary Policy Committee voted to hold, while two favored to cut by 25 basis points, the same as during the May meeting.
    In a statement, the MPC noted inflation had reached the central bank’s target and said indicators of “short-term inflation expectations” and wage growth had eased.

    It was “very difficult to gauge the evolution of labour market activity” because of uncertainty around estimates from the Office for National Statistics, the MPC added.
    In a repeat of previous messaging that some analysts had thought it may drop, it again said monetary policy needs to “remain restrictive for sufficiently long to return inflation to the 2% target sustainably.”

    Inflation data on Wednesday showed headline price rises cooled to 2% in May, hitting target ahead of the U.S. and the euro zone, despite the U.K. suffering a sharper spike inflation over the last two years.
    However, economists say the U.K.’s continued high rates of services and core inflation suggest the potential for ongoing upward pressure.

    The central bank’s decision to hold comes just two weeks out from a general election in which the state of the economy and proposals for rebooting sluggish growth have emerged as a key battleground.
    Despite speculation that the politically-independent BOE might act more cautiously as a result of the upcoming vote, Governor Andrew Bailey had emphasized that it would remain focused on its own data.

    ‘Finely balanced’

    Attention will now turn to the prospects of an August rate cut. Money market pricing indicated a nearly 50% chance of this following Thursday’s statement, higher than the previous day.
    The MPC said that among the seven members who voted to hold, there was disagreement over the level of accumulated evidence that would be required to warrant a cut and that their decision was “finely balanced.”
    Some believed that key indicators of inflation persistence “remained elevated,” with particular concern over second-round effects from services, strong domestic demand and wage growth. Others, however, felt hotter-than-expected services inflation in May had not significantly impacted the U.K.’s overall disinflation trajectory.
    Ruth Gregory, deputy chief U.K. economist at Capital Economics, said in a note that “several developments implied a rate cut is getting closer,” including the “finely balanced” comment and the fact that the BOE’s overall tone had not become any more hawkish since May.
    The chance of a summer interest rate cut is higher than the 30-40% that was previously being priced by markets, according to James Smith, developed markets economist at ING.
    “I think the inflation numbers, services inflation… I think the road is still down for that, and I think they’ll [the BoE] remain reasonably confident,” Smith told CNBC’s Silvia Amaro following Thursday’s announcement.
    “A bit like the [European Central Bank], I think they’ve got more confidence in their inflation forecasting ability than maybe 6-12 months ago.”
    Other central banks in Europe have already begun to ease monetary policy, including the European Central Bank, Swiss National Bank and Sweden’s Riksbank, as they seek to reboot economic growth.
    That’s even as the U.S. Federal Reserve, sometimes viewed as the central bank leader due to the U.S.’s outsize influence on the global economy, has left traders pondering when its first rate cut will come. Money market pricing suggests a 65% chance of a September cut, according to LSEG data.
    The British pound extended losses against the U.S. dollar, trading 0.3% lower at $1.267 at 1 p.m. in London. More

  • in

    Switzerland makes second interest rate cut as major economies diverge on monetary policy easing

    The Swiss National Bank trimmed its key interest rate by 25 basis points to 1.25% in its second cut of the year.
    Two thirds of economists polled by Reuters had anticipated the SNB would decide in favor of a 25-basis-point-cut to 1.25%.
    The country’s inflation flatlined at 1.4% in May after a bump up in April and is expected to average the same level across full-year 2024, according to the SNB’s latest projections.

    A view of the headquarters of the Swiss National Bank (SNB), before a press conference in Zurich, Switzerland, March 21, 2024. 
    Denis Balibouse | Reuters

    The Swiss National Bank on Thursday trimmed its key interest rate by 25 basis points to 1.25%, continuing cuts at a time when sentiment over monetary policy easing remains mixed among major economies.
    Two thirds of economists polled by Reuters had anticipated the SNB would decide in favor of a 25-basis-point-cut to 1.25%.

    The Swiss franc weakened in the wake of the announcement, with the Euro gaining 0.3% and the U.S. dollar up 0.5% against the Swiss currency at 8:55 a.m. London time.
    Following the Thursday decision, the Swiss central bank pegged its conditional forecast for inflation at 1.3% for 2024, 1.1% for 2025 and 1.0% for 2026. The figures assumes a SNB interest rate of 1.25% over the prediction period.
    The country’s inflation flatlined at 1.4% in May after a bump up in April and is expected to average the same level across full-year 2024, according to the SNB’s latest projections.
    The Swiss bank said it now anticipates economic growth of around 1% this year and around 1.5% in 2025, anticipating slight increases in unemployment and small declines in the utilization of production capacity.
    “Over the medium term, economic activity should improve gradually, supported by somewhat stronger demand from abroad,” the SNB said.

    Speaking to CNBC’s Silvia Amaro, SNB Chair Thomas Jordan stressed the impact that inflationary winds had on the bank’s latest decision-making.
    “[We have] inflationary pressures that slightly declined, we have also [a] strong Swiss franc, and we have an increase in uncertainty globally. So, we came to the conclusion that, given those circumstances, it is best to lower rates by 25 basis points,” he said.
    While underlining that the SNB’s foremost instrument is its interest rate, Jordan said that the bank is also ready to intervene into the foreign exchange market, if necessary.
    “There are big swings in the exchange rate that could have an impact, or, really, big changes in [the] economic outlook of the world economy,” he noted. “The Swiss franc appreciated to some extent, vis-à-vis our last monetary meeting. The exchange rate has an influence on monetary conditions, and we take that into account.”
    Jordan confirmed he will attend his last SNB monetary policy meeting in September, before leaving his post that month.

    Future steps

    Switzerland already has the second-lowest interest rate of the Group of Ten democracies by a wide margin, following Japan. It became the first major economy to cut interest rates back in late March and was earlier this month followed by the European Central Bank, and questions are now mounting over whether it will proceed with a third rate cut this year.
    The SNB’s inflation forecast “suggests that there is still some restrictiveness to be squeezed out this year, and for me, that is a heavy signal that another rate cut is coming in September,” said Kyle Chapman, FX markets analyst at Ballinger Group. “I expect the SNB to follow up with a third cut next quarter, and there is potential for a fourth in December if there is still high conviction in the restrictive level of monetary policy.” 
    He signaled that this outlook leaves the Swiss franc in a “vulnerable position.”
    A Capital Economics analysis note out Thursday disagreed with the view, saying that the SNB is unlikely to proceed with further cuts this year in the current inflationary landscape.
    “Looking ahead, we think that the SNB will not cut rates again this year as we are now no longer confident that underlying inflationary pressures are abating because labour compensation is growing at a strong rate and services inflation remains very sticky,” the note said.
    Adrien Pichoud, chief economist at Bank Syz, also said that the SNB is “now done with the recalibration of its monetary policy and that it shouldn’t cut rates further this year.”
    The U.S. Federal Reserve has yet to blink on interest rate reductions, and market participants will be following later in the Thursday session to see if the Bank of England takes the leap to trim, after U.K. inflation eased to the 2% target for the first time in nearly three years. More

  • in

    Dilemma on Wall Street: Short-Term Gain or Climate Benefit?

    A team of economists recently analyzed 20 years of peer-reviewed research on the social cost of carbon, an estimate of the damage from climate change. They concluded that the average cost, adjusted for improved methods, is substantially higher than even the U.S. government’s most up-to-date figure.That means greenhouse gas emissions, over time, will take a larger toll than regulators are accounting for. As tools for measuring the links between weather patterns and economic output evolve — and the interactions between weather and the economy magnify the costs in unpredictable ways — the damage estimates have only risen.It’s the kind of data that one might expect to set off alarm bells across the financial industry, which closely tracks economic developments that might affect portfolios of stocks and loans. But it was hard to detect even a ripple.In fact, the news from Wall Street lately has mostly been about retreat from climate goals, rather than recommitment. Banks and asset managers are withdrawing from international climate alliances and chafing at their rules. Regional banks are stepping up lending to fossil fuel producers. Sustainable investment funds have sustained crippling outflows, and many have collapsed.So what explains this apparent disconnect? In some cases, it’s a classic prisoner’s dilemma: If firms collectively shift to cleaner energy, a cooler climate benefits everyone more in the future. But in the short term, each firm has an individual incentive to cash in on fossil fuels, making the transition much harder to achieve.And when it comes to avoiding climate damage to their own operations, the financial industry is genuinely struggling to comprehend what a warming future will mean.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More