Evelyn Reynolds

More stories

  • 250 Shares99 Views

    in Economy

    European Central Bank raises rates by a quarter percentage point, says inflation set to remain ‘too high for too long’

    “Inflation continues to decline but is still expected to remain too high for too long,” the ECB said Thursday in a statement.
    The central bank did not share any forward guidance about upcoming moves.
    ECB President Christine Lagarde will outline the decision at 14:45 Frankfurt time.

    The European Central Bank announced a new rate decision Thursday.
    Daniel Roland | AFP | Getty Images

    The European Central Bank on Thursday announced a new rate increase of a quarter percentage point, bringing its main rate to 3.75%.
    The latest move completes a full year of consecutive rate hikes in the euro zone, after the ECB embarked on its journey to tackle high inflation last July.

    “Inflation continues to decline but is still expected to remain too high for too long,” the ECB said Thursday in a statement.
    A headline inflation reading showed the rate coming down to 5.5% in June from 6.1% in May — still far above the ECB’s target of 2%. Fresh inflation data out of the euro zone is due out next week.

    What next?

    While market players had expected the 25 basis point hike, a lot of anticipation remains about the ECB’s post-summer approach. Inflation has eased, but questions linger about whether monetary policy is pushing the region into an economic recession.
    The central bank did not share any forward guidance about upcoming moves.
    “The Governing Council will continue to follow a data-dependent approach to determining the appropriate level and duration of restriction,” it said.

    Speaking at a press conference, European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde said, “Our assessment of data will tell us whether and how much ground we have to cover.”
    She added that her team is “open-minded” about upcoming decisions. The central bank might hike or hold rates steady in September, but whatever it does it will not be definitive, she said.
    Lagarde went further when pressed by the press, saying, “We are not going to cut.”
    Carsten Brzeski, global head of macro at ING Germany, said: “What is more interesting, the accompanying policy statement kept the door for further rate hikes wide open and did not strike a more cautious note.”
    Neil Birrell, Chief Investment Officer at Premier Miton Investors, said in a statement, “If rates are yet not at the peak, we are not far away, and the conversation may soon move to how long they will stay at the peak.”
    An ECB survey showed that corporate loans in the euro zone dropped to their lowest level ever between the middle of June and early July.
    Euro zone business activity data released earlier this week pointed to declines in the region’s biggest economies, Germany and France. The figures increased the chances of a recession in the euro area this year, according to analysts at ING Germany.
    The International Monetary Fund said this week that the euro zone is likely to grow by 0.9% this year, but that factors in a recession in Germany, where the GDP is expected to contract by 0.3%.
    The ECB also announced on Thursday that it will set the remuneration of minimum reserves to 0% — which means that banks will not earn any interest from the central bank on their reserves.

    Market reaction

    The euro traded lower against the U.S. dollar off the back of the announcement, dropping by 0.3% to $1.105. The Stoxx 600 jumped 1.2%, while government bond yields dropped.
    The reactions highlight that market players are probably expecting further rate increases in the euro zone. More

  • 188 Shares199 Views

    in Economy

    GDP grew at a 2.4% pace in the second quarter, topping expectations despite recession calls

    Gross domestic product rose at a 2.4% annualized pace in the second quarter, topping the 2% estimate.
    Consumer spending powered the solid quarter, aided by increases in nonresidential fixed investment, government spending and inventory growth.
    A Commerce Department inflation gauge increased 2.6%, down from a 4.1% rise in Q1 and well below the estimate for a gain of 3.2%.

    The U.S. economy showed few signs of recession in the second quarter, as gross domestic product grew at a faster than expected pace during the period, the Commerce Department reported Thursday.
    GDP, the sum of all goods and services activity, increased at a 2.4% annualized rate for the April-through-June period, better than the 2% consensus estimate from Dow Jones. GDP rose at a 2% pace in the first quarter.

    Markets moved higher following the report, with stocks poised for a positive open and Treasury yields on the rise.
    Consumer spending powered the solid quarter, aided by increases in nonresidential fixed investment, government spending and inventory growth.
    Perhaps as important, inflation was held in check through the period. The personal consumption expenditures price index increased 2.6%, down from a 4.1% rise in the first quarter and well below the Dow Jones estimate for a gain of 3.2%.
    Consumer spending, as gauged by the department’s personal consumption expenditures index, increased 1.6% and accounted for 68% of all economic activity during the quarter.
    In the face of persistent calls for a recession, the economy showed surprising resilience despite a series of Federal Reserve interest rate increases that most Wall Street economists and even those at the central bank expect to cause a contraction.

    “It’s great to have another quarter of positive GDP growth in tandem with a consistently slowing inflation rate,” said Steve Rick, chief economist at TruStage. “After yesterday’s resumption of interest rate hikes, it’s encouraging to see the aggressive hike cycle working as inflation continues to decline. Consumers are getting a reprieve from the rising costs of core goods, and the U.S. economy is off to a stronger start to the first half of the year.”
    Growth hasn’t posted a negative reading since the second quarter of 2022, when GDP fell at a 0.6% rate. That was the second straight quarter of negative growth, meeting the technical definition of a recession. However, the National Bureau of Economic Research is the official arbiter of expansion and contractions, and few expect it to call the period a recession.
    Thursday’s report indicated widespread growth.
    Gross private domestic investment increased by 5.7% after tumbling 11.9% in the first quarter. A 10.8% surge in equipment and a 9.7% increase in structures helped power that gain.
    Government spending increased 2.6%, including a 2.5% jump in defense expenditures and 3.6% growth at the state and local levels.
    Separate reports Thursday brought more positive economic news.
    Durable goods orders for items such as vehicles, computers and appliances rose 4.7% in June, much higher than the 1.5% estimate, according to the Commerce Department. Also, weekly jobless claims totaled 221,000, a decline of 7,000 and below the 235,000 estimate.
    Powerful employment gains and a resilient consumer are at the heart of the growing economy.
    Nonfarm payrolls have grown by nearly 1.7 million so far in 2023 and the 3.6% unemployment rate for June is the same as it was a year ago. Consumers, meanwhile, continue to spend, and sentiment gauges have been rising in recent months. For instance, the closely watched University of Michigan sentiment survey hit a nearly two-year high in July.
    Economists have expected the Fed rate hikes to lead to a credit contraction that ultimately takes the air out of the growth spurt over the past year. The Fed has hiked 11 times since March 2022, the most recent coming Wednesday with a quarter-point increase that took the central bank’s key borrowing rate to its highest level in more than 22 years.
    Markets are betting that Wednesday’s hike will be the last of this tightening cycle, though officials such as Chairman Jerome Powell say no decision has been made on the future policy path.
    Housing has been a particular soft spot after surging early in the Covid pandemic. Prices, though, are showing signs of rebounding even as the real estate market is burdened by a lack of supply.
    Following the Wednesday rate hike, the Fed characterized growth as “moderate,” a slight boost from the characterization of “modest” in June.
    Still, signs of trouble persist.
    Markets have been betting on a recession, pushing the 2-year Treasury yield well above that for the 10-year note. That phenomenon, called an inverted yield curve, has a near-perfect record for indicating a recession in the next 12 months.
    Similarly, the inversion of the 3-month and 10-year curve is pointing to a 67% chance of contraction as of the end of June, according to a New York Fed gauge. More

  • 163 Shares99 Views

    in Economy

    GDP Grew at 2.4% Rate in Q2 as US Economy Stayed on Track

    The reading on gross domestic product was bolstered by consumer spending, showing that recession forecasts early in the year were premature, at least.The economic recovery stayed on track in the spring, as American consumers continued spending despite rising interest rates and warnings of a looming recession.Gross domestic product, adjusted for inflation, rose at a 2.4 percent annual rate in the second quarter, the Commerce Department said Thursday. That was up from a 2 percent growth rate in the first three months of the year and far stronger than forecasters expected a few months ago.Consumers led the way, as they have throughout the recovery from the severe but short-lived pandemic recession. Spending rose at a 1.6 percent rate, with much of that coming from spending on services, as consumers shelled out for vacation travel, restaurant meals and Taylor Swift tickets.“The consumer sector is really keeping things afloat,” said Yelena Shulyatyeva, an economist at BNP Paribas.The resilience of the economy has surprised economists, many of whom thought that high inflation — and the Federal Reserve’s efforts to stamp it out through aggressive interest-rate increases — would lead to a recession, or at least a clear slowdown in the first half of the year. For a while, it looked as if they were going to be right: Tech companies were laying off tens of thousands of workers, the housing market was in a deep slump and a series of bank failures set up fears of a financial crisis.Instead, layoffs were mostly contained to a handful of industries, the banking crisis did not spread and even the housing market has begun to stabilize.“The things we were all freaked out about earlier this year all went away,” said Michael Gapen, chief U.S. economist at Bank of America.Inflation has also slowed significantly. That has eased pressure on the Fed to keep raising rates, leading some forecasters to question whether a recession is such a sure thing after all. Jerome H. Powell, the Fed chair, said on Wednesday that the central bank’s staff economists no longer expected a recession to begin this year.Still, many economists say consumers are likely to pull back their spending in the second half of the year, putting a drag on the recovery. Savings built up earlier in the pandemic are dwindling. Credit card balances are rising. And although unemployment remains low, job growth and wage growth have slowed.“All those tailwinds and buffers that were supporting consumption are not as strong anymore,” said Blerina Uruci, chief U.S. economist at T. Rowe Price. “It feels to me like this hard landing has been delayed rather than canceled.” More

  • 50 Shares159 Views

    in Economy

    The Fed’s Difficult Choice

    The Federal Reserve has raised interest rates again. When should it stop?After raising interest rates again yesterday, the Federal Reserve now faces a tough decision.Some economists believe that the Fed has raised its benchmark rate — and, by extension, the cost of many loans across the U.S. economy — enough to have solved the severe inflation of the past couple years. Any further increases in that benchmark rate, which is now at its highest level in 22 years, would heighten the risk of a recession, according to these economists. In the parlance of economics, they are known as doves.But other experts — the hawks — point out that annual inflation remains at 3 percent, above the level the Fed prefers. Unless Fed officials add at least one more interest rate increase in coming months, consumers and business may become accustomed to high inflation, making it all the harder to eliminate.For now, Jerome Powell, the Fed chair, and his colleagues are choosing not to take a side. They will watch the economic data and make a decision at their next meeting, on Sept. 20. “We’ve come a long way,” Powell said during a news conference yesterday, after the announcement that the benchmark rate would rise another quarter of a percentage point, to as much as 5.5 percent. “We can afford to be a little patient.”The charts below, by our colleague Ashley Wu, capture the recent trends. Inflation is both way down and still somewhat elevated, while economic growth has slowed but remains above zero.Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics; Bureau of Economic Analysis | By The New York TimesToday’s newsletter walks through the dove-vs.-hawk debate as a way of helping you understand the current condition of the U.S. economy.The doves’ caseThe doves emphasize both the steep recent decline in inflation and the forces that may cause it to continue falling. Supply chain snarls have eased, and the strong labor market, which helped drive up prices, seems to be cooling. “A happy outcome that not long ago seemed like wishful thinking now looks more likely than not,” the economist Paul Krugman wrote in Times Opinion this month.Economists refer to this happy outcome — reduced inflation without a recession — as a soft landing. The doves worry that a September rate hike could imperil that soft landing. (Already, corporate defaults have risen.)“It’s crystal clear that low inflation and low unemployment are compatible,” Rakeen Mabud, an economist at the Groundwork Collaborative, a progressive think tank, told our colleague Talmon Joseph Smith. “It’s time for the Fed to stop raising rates.”A recession would be particularly damaging to vulnerable Americans, including low-income and disabled people. The tight labor market has drawn more of them into work and helped them earn raises.The hawks’ caseThe hawks see the risks differently. They point to some signs that the official inflation rate of 3 percent is artificially low. Annual core inflation — a measure that omits food and fuel costs, which are both volatile — remains closer to 5 percent.“The Fed should not stop raising rates until there is clear evidence that core inflation is on a path to its 2 percent target,” Michael Strain of the American Enterprise Institute writes. “That evidence does not exist today, and it probably will not exist by the time the Fed meets in September.” (Adding to the hawks’ case is the fact that big consumer companies like Unilever keep raising their prices, J. Edward Moreno of The Times explains.)Fed officials themselves have argued that it’s important to tame inflation quickly to keep Americans from becoming used to rising prices — and demanding larger raises to keep up with prices, which could in turn become another force causing prices to rise.At root, the hawk case revolves around the notion that reversing high inflation is extremely difficult. When in doubt, hawks say, the Fed should err on the side of vigilance, to keep the U.S. from falling into an extended and damaging period of inflation as it did in the 1970s.And where do Fed officials come down? They have the advantage of not needing to pick a side, at least not yet. Between now and September, two more months of data will be available on prices, employment and more. Powell yesterday called a September rate increase “certainly possible,” but added, “I would also say it’s possible that we would choose to hold steady.”As our colleague Jeanna Smialek, who covers the Fed, says, “They have every incentive to give themselves wiggle room.”More on the FedThe Fed’s economists are no longer forecasting a recession this year.Powell noted that the labor force has been growing. “That’s good news for the Fed, because it helps ease the labor shortage without driving up unemployment,” Ben Casselman wrote.Responding to a question from Jeanna, Powell said it was good that consumer demand for the “Barbie” movie was so high — but that persistently high spending could be a reason for a future rate increase.Stock indexes rose after the Fed announced the increase, but fell after Powell delivered his economic outlook.THE LATEST NEWSWar in UkraineA Ukrainian soldier on the front line in eastern Ukraine.Tyler Hicks/The New York TimesUkraine appears to be intensifying its counteroffensive. Reinforcements are pouring into the fight, many trained and equipped by the West.The attack looks to be focused in the southern region of Zaporizhzhia, with the aim of severing Russian-occupied territories in Ukraine.U.S. officials said the assault was timed to take advantage of turmoil in the Russian military.PoliticsA judge halted Hunter Biden’s plea deal on tax charges after the two sides disagreed over how much immunity it granted him.In her first Supreme Court term, Ketanji Brown Jackson secured a book deal worth about $3 million, the latest justice to parlay fame into a big book contract.Mitch McConnell, the 81-year-old Senate Republican leader, abruptly stopped speaking during a Capitol news conference and was escorted away. He spoke in public again later.A former intelligence officer told Congress that the U.S. government had retrieved materials from U.F.O.s. The Pentagon denied his claim.Rudy Giuliani admitted to lying about two Georgia election workers he accused of mishandling ballots in 2020.Representative George Santos used his candidacy and ties to Republican donors to seek moneymaking opportunities.Other Big StoriesGetty ImagesSinead O’Connor, the Irish singer who had a No. 1 hit with “Nothing Compares 2 U,” died at 56. She drew a firestorm when she ripped up a photo of the pope on live TV.The heat wave that has scorched the southern U.S. is bringing 100-degree heat to the Midwest. The East Coast is probably next.Israel’s Supreme Court agreed to hear petitions challenging the new law limiting its power.Soldiers in Niger ousted the president and announced a coup.Gap hired Richard Dickson, the Mattel president who helped revitalize Barbie, as its chief executive.The messaging platform Slack was having an outage this morning.OpinionsCongress should create an agency to curtail Big Tech, Senators Lindsey Graham, a Republican, and Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat, argue.Thousands of Americans drown every year. More public pools would help, Mara Gay writes.Here are columns by Nicholas Kristof on affirmative action and Pamela Paul on the so-called Citi Bike Karen.MORNING READSEternally cool: Fans keep you dry on a hot day. They let you channel Beyoncé. They say, “I love you.” Can an air-conditioner do that?The yips: A star pitcher lost her ability to throw to first base. Now, she helps young athletes with the same problem.Spillover: Could the next pandemic start at the county fair?Lives Lived: Bo Goldman was one of Hollywood’s most admired screenwriters, winning Oscars for “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest” and “Melvin and Howard.” He died at 90.WOMEN’S WORLD CUPThe Dutch midfielder Jill Roord, left, and Lindsey Horan of the U.S. team.Grant Down/Agence France-Presse — Getty ImagesA second-half goal from the co-captain Lindsey Horan gave the U.S. a 1-1 tie against the Netherlands, in an evenly matched game.Spain’s star midfielder Alexia Putellas returned to the starting lineup for the first time in more than a year after a knee injury.OTHER SPORTS NEWSOff the market: The Angels are reportedly withdrawing the superstar Shohei Ohtani from trade talks.Honeymoon phase: Aaron Rodgers agreed to a reworked contract with the Jets, which saves the team money and likely ensures he plays multiple seasons in New York.ARTS AND IDEAS Alfonso Duran for The New York TimesA growing dialect: What is Miami English? The linguist Phillip Carter calls it “probably the most important bilingual situation in the Americas today,” but it’s not Spanglish, in which a sentence bounces between English and Spanish. Instead, Miamians — even those who are not bilingual — have adopted literal translations of Spanish phrases in their English speech. Some examples: “get down from the car” (from “bajarse del carro”) instead of “get out of the car,” and “make the line” (from “hacer la fila”) instead of “join the line.”More on cultureKevin Spacey was found not guilty in Britain of sexual assault.The Japanese pop star Shinjiro Atae came out as gay, a rare announcement in a country where same-sex marriage isn’t legal.THE MORNING RECOMMENDS …Armando Rafael for The New York TimesBrighten up grilled chicken with Tajín, the Mexican seasoning made with red chiles and lime.Preserve vintage clothes in wearable condition.Calculate your life expectancy to guide health care choices.Consider a body pillow.Reduce exposure to forever chemicals in tap water.GAMESHere is today’s Spelling Bee. Yesterday’s pangram was thrilling.And here are today’s Mini Crossword, Wordle and Sudoku.Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow.P.S. David is on “The Daily” to talk about how the wealthy get an advantage in college admissions.Sign up here to get this newsletter in your inbox. Reach our team at themorning@nytimes.com. More

  • 138 Shares99 Views

    in Economy

    Jobs Sit Empty in the Public Sector, So Unions Help Recruit

    Shortages of state and city personnel, especially those who must work on site, are so dire that unions are helping to get people in the door.The State of Minnesota, like nearly every public-sector employer across the country, is in a hiring crunch.Not just for any job, though. The desk jobs that can be done remotely, with flexible schedules? Applicants for those positions are relatively abundant. It’s the nurses, groundskeepers, plumbers, social workers and prison guards — those who are on site, sometimes at odd hours — that the state really can’t find.“It’s terrifying, if I’m being honest,” said Mitchell Kuhne, a sergeant with the Department of Corrections staffing a table at a state jobs fair in Minneapolis this week. “People just don’t know about the opportunities that exist. It’s a great work force, it’s a great field to be in, but it’s a really intimidating thing that isn’t portrayed accurately in the movies and media.”Understaffing requires employees to pick up many hours of mandatory overtime, Mr. Kuhne said. The additional income can be welcome, but also makes home life difficult for new recruits, and many quit within a few weeks. So his union, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, is playing an unusual role — helping their bosses recruit workers.It’s a nationwide quandary. While private-sector employment fully regained its prepandemic level a year ago — and now sits 3 percent above it — state and local governments remain about 1 percent below the 20 million people they had on staff in February 2020. The job-opening rate for public-sector positions is below that of private businesses, but hasn’t come down as much from the highs of 2022.Private-Sector Employment Bounced Back. State and Local Government Hasn’t Recovered.Employment level as a percentage of employment in February 2020

    Source: Bureau of Labor StatisticsBy The New York TimesIn historical perspective, it could be worse: State and local government employment had only barely recovered from a long slide after the 2007-9 recession, which left many public services underpowered as states and cities lacked the funding to return to full strength.This time, the problem is different. Tax collections recovered more quickly than expected, and the federal government helped with transfers of cash to local jurisdictions to offset the effects of the Covid-19 crisis. That helped many governments award temporary pay increases to retain key personnel, and hire others into departments that had been cut to the bone, such as public health.But officials then faced a new twist. Wages in the private sector were growing faster than they had in decades, drawing people away from government jobs that had, for some, become too stressful. Civil servants also tend to be older than other workers, and more of them retired early rather than put up with mounting strain. As federal relief funds peter out, governments face difficult questions about how to maintain competitive pay.Public needs, however, have only increased. Minnesota, along with recovering from a hiring freeze early in the pandemic, has passed larger budgets and new laws — regulating cannabis sales, for example — that have added hundreds of positions across several agencies. At the same time, the federal infrastructure bill is supercharging demand for people to manage construction projects.That’s a victory for labor unions, which typically push for more hiring, higher wages and better benefits. But it doesn’t help them much if positions stay empty. A survey of local government human resource officers, released in June by the nonprofit research organization Mission Square, found that more than half the respondents had to reopen recruitment processes very often or frequently for lack of enough applications. In Minnesota, the vacancy rate for state government jobs rose to 11.5 percent in the 2023 fiscal year from 7.5 percent in 2019.That’s why the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, known as AFSCME, decided it needed to pitch in on a function usually reserved for human resources departments: getting people in the door. The union has started a national campaign to generate buzz around frontline positions, while locals are contacting community organizations and even families of union members to spotlight opportunities.“Our employers are feeling the heat,” said Lee Saunders, the union’s president. “They understand that services are not being provided at the level that they should be provided. It’s a team effort as far as bringing fresh blood into the public service.”That was the point of the hiring fair in Minneapolis. Seventy-five job seekers filtered through, often looking for more stable or higher-paying positions than the ones they held, usually referred by a friend or relative in the union.Cassandra Crawford spoke to someone at nearly every table, looking for something better paid and more active than her remote job in health care administration. “The older you get, the more you want to move your body,” she said. Speaking with recruiters in person was also more encouraging than sending her résumé to an automated portal. “I think they might remember me,” she said, laughing.Joel Shanight, 43, a disabled Army veteran and Peace Corps volunteer with experience in hostile environments, expressed confidence that he had landed a job doing roadway assistance on state highways. After doing unsatisfying accounting work in the private sector, he was glad to have learned about positions that could allow him to help people again.“I can’t find that in the corporate world,” Mr. Shanight said. “There’s no compassion anymore.”Also present were high-level officials from the state government, including Jamie Long, the House majority leader, who praised the union for helping out. Other government unions — like the American Federation of Teachers, which represents a field that saw an exodus during the pandemic — also have programs to try to bring more people into the classroom.AFSCME plans to create a national training and development center that will maintain a database of available union-represented jobs and centralize apprenticeship programs to build the next generation of public servants.Joseph McCartin, the executive director of the Kalmanovitz Initiative for Labor and the Working Poor at Georgetown University, said he hadn’t seen anything similar since World War II, when unions joined the federal government to fill positions essential to the military effort. Unions can be trusted messengers in communities, he said, and have a better understanding of what job seekers are looking for than employers do.A tour bus used for recruitment by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, a trade union of public employees, at the hiring fair in Minneapolis this week.Tim Gruber for The New York Times“I think it’s an extraordinary development,” Dr. McCartin said. “It’s a great advantage when you have a partner that’s going to be working with you to try to help you solve this problem.”Some states that limit collective bargaining in the public sector think that not having to deal with labor organizations allows them to adapt compensation more quickly in response to staffing needs. But they still deal with their share of difficulty in hiring.Take Idaho, whose population boomed during the pandemic. By the 2022 fiscal year, the state was facing vacancy rates as high as 20 percent at the Department of Corrections and 15 percent in the Department of Health and Welfare. A benchmarking analysis found that state jobs paid 24.6 percent less than the private sector for comparable positions, and annual turnover had reached 21.8 percent.The state ramped up recruiting, eased formal education requirements for some positions and brought on contractors to fill labor gaps, which is expensive. Those moves didn’t solve the problem, especially for less attractive shifts at hospitals, prisons and veterans’ homes, which couldn’t fill available beds because of understaffing.So in early 2023, Gov. Brad Little, a conservative Republican, asked for an 8.5 percent across-the-board pay increase for state workers over two years, with another 6 percent for those in public safety. Next year the governor plans to seek the same bump for workers in health care, information technology and engineering.The Legislature generally went along with those recommendations, with a few tweaks. But given the continuing constraints, Lori Wolff, head of the Division of Human Resources, said she was looking for ways to provide services with fewer people, especially for tasks like enrolling people in state benefits.“There’s a lot of jobs that we’re going to have to start looking at technology to solve,” Ms. Wolff said.The state’s 199 municipalities have an even tougher time increasing pay and adopting automated services. The state has limited their ability to raise revenue through property taxes, so it has been more difficult to compete. Skyrocketing housing costs are compounding that problem, fueled by high-income remote workers who moved out of bigger cities during the pandemic.Kelley Packer, director of the Association of Idaho Cities, said she had recently spoken with a member whose public works director had been forced to live in his car.“It’s a really interesting balancing act to allow for the growth to happen, and meet the needs of the housing crisis that we’re in, and still be able to provide services with a restricted property tax system,” Ms. Packer said.Of course, it’s not all about salary. Rivka Liss-Levinson, research director with Mission Square, said people usually listed three primary motivations to work for governments: job security, job satisfaction and robust retirement benefits. Conveying the value of comparatively generous health care coverage and pensions, plus the public service mission, is still the basic strategy.“Those things haven’t really changed over time,” Dr. Liss-Levinson said. “States and localities that are able to address these needs and concerns are the ones that are going to thrive when it comes to recruitment and retention.” More

  • 113 Shares149 Views

    in Economy

    What to Watch at the Federal Reserve’s July Meeting

    The Federal Reserve is poised to raise interest rates after pausing in June. What comes next is crucial, but don’t expect clear commitments.The Federal Reserve is widely expected to raise interest rates at its meeting on Wednesday, and economists will be watching for hints at what officials expect next — and how they think the central bank’s fight against rapid inflation is going.Fed officials will release their decision at 2 p.m., after which Jerome H. Powell, the Fed chair, will hold a news conference.Policymakers are expected to raise rates to a range of 5.25 to 5.5 percent this week, their 11th move since they began to lift borrowing costs in March 2022. Officials ratcheted rates higher rapidly last year but have been slowing their campaign for months, even skipping an adjustment in June after 10 consecutive moves.The central question now is: When will they stop?Central bankers are unlikely to make a clear commitment this week. They have projected one additional rate move this year, to a 5.5 to 5.75 percent range, but officials will not yet need to commit to when — or even whether — that move is happening. Fed officials will have plenty of time, and plenty of data to parse, before they release their next rate decision and a fresh set of quarterly economic projections on Sept. 20. Still, investors and Fed watchers in general will be monitoring a few key developments on Wednesday.The Fed statement may not change much.Many economists expect the Fed to leave their post-meeting statement, which they use to announce their interest rates stance, mostly unchanged at this meeting.The Fed statement said last month that “in determining the extent of additional policy firming that may be appropriate,” officials would consider how much they had already raised rates, how quickly that was working to slow the economy and how both economic data and the financial system were holding up.Both jobs numbers and inflation figures have softened somewhat since the Fed’s June meeting, prompting investors and some economists to mark down the chances of another rate increase this year. But Fed officials will probably avoid signaling that they are backing away from the possibility of raising interest rates further.“They don’t want markets to get ahead of themselves and think it’s over,” said Yelena Shulyatyeva at BNP Paribas. “Our forecast is July and done, but if inflation re-accelerates, they’ll keep on going.”The news conference will be all about tone.If the statement is as plain vanilla as expected, it will put all eyes on Mr. Powell’s news conference. The Fed chair has so far been careful to send two big signals: Rates may need to rise further, and they will almost certainly stay high for some time.“Although policy is restrictive, it may not be restrictive enough, and it has not been restrictive for long enough,” Mr. Powell said on June 28.The Fed might be feeling a little bit better about inflation after the Consumer Price Index report for June came in softer than expected, with an encouraging slowdown in a few closely watched service categories. The overall inflation number stood at just 3 percent, down from 9.1 percent at its peak last summer. (Fed officials aim for 2 percent inflation using a separate but related inflation measure called the Personal Consumption Expenditures price index, which is set for release on Friday.)But that good news is just one month of data.Wall Street economists forecast that inflation will continue to slowdown, but wild cards abound: Gas prices popped at the pump this week after a shutdown at an Exxon Mobil refinery, and the peak of hurricane season still lays ahead. Market-based wheat prices have climbed this month after Russia pulled out of an agreement guaranteeing safe passage for ships carrying grains across the Black Sea, which could eventually trickle through to lift consumer costs.Those may ultimately prove to be blips, but they underline that shocks could still push prices up. Nor are big surprises the only thing to worry about: Price increases could simply prove stubborn.A lot of the slowdown in inflation so far has come from healing supply chains and a return to normal in categories heavily affected by the pandemic. The economy is slowing, which could lower price increases broadly over time, but job gains remain faster than before the pandemic and consumer spending still has momentum under the surface.That’s why Mr. Powell has been striking a cautious tone to date.“We’ve all seen inflation be — over and over again — shown to be more persistent and stronger than we expected,” Mr. Powell said at an event in Spain late last month.Incoming data are key going forward.The big question for Fed officials is whether they have done enough to feel confident that the economy will slow and inflation will return fully to their 2 percent goal. They will be looking toward a number of data releases over the coming weeks for the answer.Policymakers will get a fresh reading on Friday of a wage measure they watch closely, the Employment Cost Index. That quarterly measure is not jerked around by shifts in the composition of the labor market the way that monthly wage data can be — making it a more reliable snapshot of pay trends — and it has yet to show a steady slowdown.Officials usually cheer on quick pay gains, but they believe that with wages rising as quickly as they have recently, it would be hard to fully cool inflation. Companies that are paying more are likely to try to charge more to protect their profit margins. Policymakers will also closely watch two incoming employment reports, for July and August, and two more inflation reports slated for release before their next gathering.Don’t expect the Fed to declare victory.One thing you won’t hear on Wednesday? The Fed declaring victory in its quest to slow inflation. Economists think that the central bank’s odds of cooling the economy without causing a recession have gone up, but it is still far too early to say for sure.If inflation threatens to stay too high, the Fed may still err on the side of overdoing it to make sure that it does not become more permanent, some have warned.Alan Blinder, a Princeton economist and former vice chair of the Fed, has argued that soft landings — or at least “soft-ish” landings, in which recessions are mild — are more common than often believed.Recent developments, Mr. Blinder said, are consistent with his view that a soft landing is possible — “I’m happy as a clam,” he said — but he said such an outcome is far from certain. He puts the probability of a recession around 40 percent. And he worries the Fed could stay too aggressive for too long, continuing to raise rates this fall despite the slowdown in inflation.“I’m starting to get a little nervous about Fed overshoot, the classic impatience,” he said.Ben Casselman More

  • 125 Shares99 Views

    in Economy

    UPS and Teamsters Reach Tentative Deal to Head Off Strike

    United Parcel Service faced a potential walkout by more than 325,000 union members after their five-year contract expires next week.United Parcel Service announced Tuesday that it had reached a tentative deal on a five-year contract with the union representing more than 325,000 of its U.S. workers, a key step in averting a potential strike.The union, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, reported in June that its UPS members had voted to authorize a walkout after the expiration of the current agreement on Aug. 1, with 97 percent of those who took part in the vote endorsing the move.UPS handles about one-quarter of the tens of millions of packages that are shipped daily in the United States, and the strike prospect has threatened to dent economic activity, particularly the e-commerce industry.Representatives from more than 150 Teamster locals will meet on Monday to review the agreement, and rank-and-file members will vote on it from Aug. 3 to Aug. 22, according to the union.Negotiations had broken down in early July, largely over the issue of part-time pay, before resuming Tuesday morning.“We demanded the best contract in the history of UPS, and we got it,” the Teamsters president, Sean M. O’Brien, said in a statement. “UPS has put $30 billion in new money on the table as a direct result of these negotiations.”The company said it could not comment on the dollar value of the deal ahead of its second-quarter earnings call in early August.The Teamsters said that under the tentative agreement, current full- and part-time UPS employees represented by the union would receive a $2.75-an-hour raise this year, and $7.50 an hour in raises over the course of the contract.The minimum pay for part-timers will rise to $21 an hour — far above the current minimum starting pay of $16.20 — and the top rate for full-time delivery drivers will rise to $49 an hour. Full-time drivers currently make $42 an hour on average after four years.The company has also pledged to create 7,500 new full-time union jobs and to fill 22,500 open positions, for which part-time workers will be eligible. The company has said that part-time workers are essential to navigating bursts of activity over the course of a day and during busy months, and that many part-timers graduate to full-time jobs.“Together we reached a win-win-win agreement on the issues that are important to Teamsters leadership, our employees and to UPS and our customers,” Carol Tomé, the company’s chief executive, said in a statement. “This agreement continues to reward UPS’s full- and part-time employees with industry-leading pay and benefits while retaining the flexibility we need to stay competitive.”The union had cited the company’s strong pandemic-era performance, with net adjusted income up more than 70 percent last year from 2019, as a reason that workers deserved substantial raises.It had especially emphasized the need to improve pay for part-timers, who account for more than half the U.S. employees represented by the Teamsters, and who the union said earn “near-minimum wage” in many areas.The path to the agreement appeared to be paved weeks ago after the two sides resolved what was arguably their most contentious issue, a new class of worker created under the previous contract.UPS had said the arrangement was intended to allow workers to take on dual roles, like sorting packages some days and driving on other days, especially Saturdays, as a way to keep up with growing demand for weekend delivery.But the Teamsters said that the hybrid idea was never actually carried out, and that in practice the new category of workers drove full time Tuesday through Saturday, only for less pay than other drivers. The company said that, under the previous contract, the Saturday drivers made about 87 percent of the base pay of other drivers and that some workers did work in a dual role.Under the tentative agreement, the lower-paid category of drivers will be eliminated, and workers who drive Tuesday through Saturday will be converted to regular full-time drivers.The deal also stipulates that no driver will be required to work an unscheduled sixth day in a week, which drivers had at times been forced to do under the existing contract to keep up with Saturday demand.The two sides also agreed on several key noneconomic issues, such as heat safety. Under the proposed deal, new trucks must have air-conditioning beginning in January, while existing trucks will be outfitted with additional fans and venting.Whether it passes will partly be a political test for Mr. O’Brien, who was elected to head the Teamsters in 2021 while regularly criticizing his predecessor, James P. Hoffa, as being too accommodating toward employers and toward UPS in particular.Mr. O’Brien argued that Mr. Hoffa had effectively forced UPS workers to accept a deeply flawed contract in 2018, even after they voted it down, and accused his Hoffa-backed rival of being reluctant to strike against the company.Since taking over as president last year, he has frequently said the union would be aggressive in pressuring UPS and suggested on several occasions that a strike was likely.A few days before the agreement on eliminating the hybrid worker position, Mr. O’Brien said in a statement that the Teamsters were walking away from the table over an “appalling counterproposal” and that a strike “now appears inevitable.”The company sought to reassure customers and the public that a deal would be consummated despite the occasionally heated pronouncements.On an earnings call in April, the UPS chief executive, Ms. Tomé, said that the two sides were aligned on many key issues and that outsiders should not be distracted by the “great deal of noise” that was likely to arise in the run-up to a deal.The deal, if ratified, removes a serious threat to the U.S. economy. Economists say a strike by UPS employees would have made it harder for businesses to ship goods on time, and the resulting restrictions in supply chains would probably have stoked inflation just as it had shown signs of easing.“It would have been devastating to the economy, just given the size and scale of UPS,” said Mike Skordeles, head of U.S. economics at Truist Advisory Services. “You can’t just pull out a player that big without causing disruption and prices to go up.”A 10-day UPS strike would cost the U.S. economy about $7 billion, according to an estimate from the Anderson Economic Group.Small businesses were most at risk from a strike as UPS might be their sole or primary shipping provider, meaning they would have to scramble for alternatives. Large retailers tend to have more diversified delivery providers and are more likely to have contingency plans to soften the blow.Mr. O’Brien had explicitly asked President Biden, who has called himself “the most pro-labor union president,” not to get involved in the negotiations. A group of over two dozen Democratic senators also pledged not to intervene.The Biden administration helped broker a deal that headed off a freight rail strike last year. Many union members involved in that dispute saw the deal as leaning too heavily in favor of the major rail carriers.In 1997, about 185,000 UPS workers staged a strike for 15 days. That time, the company reported that the strike cost it more than $600 million. But the last strike happened when e-commerce was in its infancy. UPS has benefited from the e-commerce boom: In 2022 it reported more than $100 billion in revenue, compared with $31 billion in 2002.J. Edward Moreno More