More stories

  • in

    Trump’s Low-Tax, High-Tariff Strategy Could Clash With Economic Realities

    The former president’s efforts to compel companies to remain in the United States had limited success while he was in the White House.As former President Donald J. Trump makes his closing economic argument ahead of the election, he is outlining a vision for a manufacturing renaissance that reprises a familiar pitch: Make goods in America and enjoy low taxes, or face punishing tariffs.Mr. Trump’s pitch combines the type of carrots-and-sharp-sticks approach that he called “America First” during his first term, when he imposed stiff tariffs on allies and competitors while lowering taxes on American firms.During a speech in Savannah, Ga., on Tuesday, Mr. Trump suggested he would go far beyond that initial approach and adopt what he rebranded a “new American industrialism.”The former president proposed creating “special” economic zones on federal land, areas that he said would enjoy low taxes and relaxed regulations. He called for companies that produce their products in the United States — regardless of where their headquarters are — to pay a corporate tax rate of 15 percent, down from the current rate of 21 percent. Businesses that try to route cars and other products into the United States from countries like Mexico would face tariffs as high as 200 percent.But Mr. Trump’s vision of a “manufacturing renaissance” comes when Americans are increasingly wary of foreign investment, particularly from Asia. And while he imposed steep tariffs during his presidency, his efforts to keep American companies from shifting production overseas ran into the harsh realities of lower-wage labor and technological advancements in other countries.While Mr. Trump was in office, manufacturing employment was essentially flat before the pandemic and had declined by the time he left office. In January 2021, the Alliance for American Manufacturing described his promises of an industrial resurgence as “mostly rhetoric.”We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    Harris to More Fully Detail Economic Plans

    Vice President Kamala Harris is set to ramp up her economic message this week, with a speech reframing her policy vision and a lengthy new document describing her approach in more detail.Her focus on economic issues comes at a pivotal moment, as many voters remain skeptical of her ability to improve the economy, which has been a top issue in the presidential campaign.Ms. Harris’s economic speech in Pittsburgh on Wednesday and the policy blueprint, described by three people familiar with the matter, are part of an effort by Ms. Harris’s campaign to weave together various economic proposals into a broader, thematic message.Over the course of her truncated campaign, Ms. Harris has released plans to offer assistance to home buyers, expand the child tax credit and raise taxes on large corporations and high-income Americans. Like her Republican rival, former President Donald J. Trump, Ms. Harris has not offered detailed plans on many other issues. The expected document will be a roughly 80-page overview of her economic policy priorities, though it is unclear how many specifics it will include.A goal for Ms. Harris’s campaign is to present a tangible economic plan that it can contrast with Project 2025, a conservative policy blueprint that Mr. Trump has tried to distance himself from, according to one of the people familiar with the campaign’s thinking.The Harris campaign declined to comment.Many voters still say they want to know more about Ms. Harris, and the economy remains the top issue in the election. In recent polls of Arizona, Georgia and North Carolina conducted by The New York Times and Siena College, 12 percent of voters who are still open to changing their mind on a candidate said they had concerns about Ms. Harris’s handling of the economy. Mr. Trump led in all three states.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    September consumer confidence falls the most in three years

    The Conference Board’s consumer confidence index slid to 98.7, down from 105.6 in August, the biggest one-month decline since August 2021.
    Respondents’ concerns focused mostly on jobs and inflation.

    Consumers’ view on the economy tumbled in September, falling by the largest level in more than three years as fears grew about jobs and business conditions, the Conference Board reported Tuesday.
    The board’s consumer confidence index slid to 98.7, down from 105.6 in August, the biggest one-month decline since August 2021. The Dow Jones consensus forecast was for a reading of 104. By contrast, the index had a reading of 132.6 in February 2020, a month before the Covid pandemic hit.

    Each of the five components the organization samples fared worse on the month, with the biggest fall coming among those aged 35-54 and earning less than $50,000.
    “Consumers’ assessments of current business conditions turned negative while views of the current labor market situation softened further. Consumers were also more pessimistic about future labor market conditions and less positive about future business conditions and future income,” said Dana Peterson, chief economist at The Conference Board.
    The last time the confidence index dropped more came as inflation was just beginning a climb to what ultimately was the highest level in more than 40 years.
    Stocks saw some brief losses following the release, while Treasury yields moved lower.
    In addition to the steep drop in the confidence index, the present situation measure worsened by 10.3 points to 124.3 and the expectations index was off 4.6 points to 81.7. On the expectations measure, a reading below 80 is consistent with a recession.

    Respondents’ concerns focused mostly on jobs and inflation.
    Those saying jobs are plentiful continued to decline, falling to 30.9% from 32.7% in August, while the jobs “hard to get” measure rose to 18.3%, up from 16.8%.
    On inflation, the 12-month outlook rose to 5.2%, with concerns over price increases topping the list of economic concerns.
    “The proportion of consumers anticipating a recession over the next 12 months remained low but there was a slight uptick in the percentage of consumers believing the economy was already in recession,” Peterson said.
    The survey comes less than a week after the Federal Reserve voted to lower benchmark interest rates by a half percentage point, citing a more favorable outlook for inflation and worries over a potentially softening labor market. It was the first rate cut in four years and double the traditional quarter-point reduction.
    The survey, though, was conducted through Sept. 17, the day before the Fed approved the rate cut.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    An East Coast Port Strike Could Shake the Economy

    Businesses are preparing for a strike by dockworkers on the East and Gulf Coasts, which could begin Oct. 1 if negotiations don’t yield a new contract.With dockworkers on the East and Gulf Coasts threatening to strike on Oct. 1, businesses have been accelerating imports, redirecting cargo and pleading with the Biden administration to prevent a walkout.Some importers started ordering Christmas goods four months earlier than usual to get them through the ports before a labor contract between the operators of port terminals and the International Longshoremen’s Association expires next Monday.Many shipments have been diverted to West Coast ports, where dockworkers belong to a different union that agreed a new contract last year. The ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles say they are handling at least as many containers as they did during the pandemic shipping boom of 2021-22.Despite those measures — and all the problem-solving skills that supply chain managers developed during the turbulence of recent years — a short strike could lead to significant disruptions. JPMorgan transportation analysts estimate that a strike could cost the economy $5 billion a day, or about 6 percent of gross domestic product, expressed daily. For each day the ports are shut down, the analysts said, it would take roughly six days to clear the backlog.Chris Butler, the chief executive of the National Tree Company, which sells artificial Christmas trees and other decorations, said his company had brought in goods early and made greater use of West Coast ports. But he estimated that 15 percent of his goods would still be stranded by a port strike.“I’m very unhappy,” said Mr. Butler, who is based in northern New Jersey. “We’re doing everything we can to mitigate it. But there’s only so much you can do when you’re at the mercy of these ports.”We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    Boeing Says It Has Made Its ‘Best and Final’ Offer to Striking Workers

    The proposal includes raises of 30 percent over the four-year contract, up from a 25 percent offer, but it’s unclear whether it will satisfy workers.Boeing on Monday made what it described as its “best and final” contract offer to more than 33,000 striking union employees.The proposal offers benefits beyond those in a tentative contract that the employees, who are represented by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, resoundingly rejected less than two weeks earlier. Boeing gave the workers, most of whom work in commercial aircraft production in the Seattle area, until the end of Friday to accept the offer.Boeing and the union restarted negotiations last week with the help of a federal mediator. The talks ended on Wednesday with no further negotiation dates scheduled, the union said at the time.Brian Bryant, the international president of the union, said in a statement on Monday that the organization was reviewing the offer.“Employees knew Boeing executives could do better, and this shows the workers were right all along,” he said. “The proposal will be analyzed to see if it’s up to the task of helping workers gain adequate ground on prior sacrifices.”The new proposal includes raises of 30 percent over the four-year term of the contract, up from the previous 25 percent offer. Boeing said it would give each worker $6,000 for approving the deal, double a previous offer. It would also reinstate performance bonuses that were set to be cut and increase a company match for employee 401(k) contributions. The rest is the same as the previous offer.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    Britain’s finance minister calls for spending discipline but no return to austerity

    The ruling Labour government has faced criticism for generating an atmosphere of doom over the state of the public finances.
    Prime Minister Keir Starmer has warned of “painful” decisions after the party rallied to victory in the July general election.

    Britain’s Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves speaks on the second day of the annual Labour Party conference in Liverpool, north-west England, on September 23, 2024. 
    Paul Ellis | Afp | Getty Images

    Liverpool, ENGLAND — U.K. Finance Minister Rachel Reeves vowed on Monday that Britain will not return to austerity, but said she would make hard choices as she lays out budget proposals next month.
    “It will be a budget with real ambition … a budget to deliver the change we promised. A budget to rebuild Britain,” she told a crowd of Labour party delegates Monday. “There will be no return to austerity.”

    Her keynote speech, briefly interrupted by heckles from a pro-Palestinian protester in the crowd, came as Labour kicked off its annual party conference on Monday — its first in power for 15 years.
    The ruling Labour government has faced criticism for generating an atmosphere of doom over the state of the public finances, with Prime Minister Keir Starmer warning of “painful” decisions after the party rallied to victory in the July general election.
    Reeves has suggested that taxes are likely to rise at her upcoming Oct. 30 Autumn budget after discovering a £22 billion ($29 billion) “black hole” in the public finances. Her predecessor Jeremy Hunt, from the rival Conservative Party, has denied the claims as “fictitious.”
    “I know that you are impatient for change. But because of that legacy inherited by the Conservatives, the road ahead is steeper and harder than we expected,” she told the audience Monday.

    Reeves defended a divisive move earlier this month to cut winter fuel allowances for millions of pensioners as the “right decision in the circumstances we inherited.”

    However, she reiterated that the government would not raise income tax, the National Insurance social security payments, value-added tax (a sales levy) and corporation tax
    Instead, she vowed to raise additional revenues by eradicating the U.K.’s non-dom tax concession and clamping down on forms of tax avoidance and tax evasion.
    “This government will not sit back and indulge those who do not pay the taxes they owe,” she said.
    Reeves also restated the government’s position as “proudly pro-business,” referencing plans next month to host a business summit and announce proposals for a new national industrial strategy. That, she said, would include measures for Britain to reach its net zero and clean energy goals by 2030.
    Additionally, she said that the government would continue to pursue trade deals to “open up new markets,” as negotiations currently remain underway with major partners such as India.

    “After years of instability and uncertainty, Britain is open for business once again,” she said.
    Half of Britons, including a quarter of Labour voters (26%), are disappointed with the government’s achievements so far, Ipsos opinion polling showed Friday. Gideon Skinner, Ipsos’ senior director of U.K. politics, said the findings were an indication that the government’s “honeymoon period” was over.
    “There’s a seeping back of pessimism and concern following a few months of hope after the election,” Skinner said earlier Monday at the Labour party conference. More

  • in

    What’s Next for Rate Cuts? The Fed Is Watching Jobs and Prices.

    A Federal Reserve official predicted quarter point rate cuts if data looked ‘fine’. But he also set out a scenario for a pause — or faster reductions.Having made their first interest rate cut in more than four years this week, Federal Reserve officials are keeping their options open as they try to figure out how rapidly to lower borrowing costs in the months ahead.Fed officials could lower interest rates in standard quarter-point increments if the data continue to look “fine,” Christopher J. Waller, a Fed governor, suggested in a CNBC interview on Friday. If inflation were to pick back up, Fed policymakers could hold rates steady.And if the job market cools more than expected or if inflation comes in weaker than expected, the Fed could reduce interest rates more rapidly.“If the data starts coming in soft and continues to come in soft,” Mr. Waller said in the interview, he would be willing “to be aggressive on rate cuts to get inflation closer to our target of 2 percent.”Central bankers appear to be poised to lower borrowing costs much more quickly than most economists had expected as recently as a month or two ago. That has left some questioning what prompted the Fed’s pivot toward a more proactive path. And the Fed’s decision to cut rates by a larger-than-usual half point this week has many investors wondering whether other large moves could be on the table.Mr. Waller’s remarks offer insight into the Fed’s thinking at a critical juncture. Policymakers are trying to bring interest rates — which they lifted rapidly starting in 2022 and have left at a high level since 2023 — back toward a more normal setting, at which the rates no longer weigh so heavily on the economy. But how rapidly to do that is a challenging question.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    The Fed has set out on a ‘recalibration’ of policy. Here’s what Powell’s new buzzword means

    Fed Chair Jerome Powell has unveiled his latest buzzword to describe monetary policy, with a “recalibration” of policy at a pivotal moment for the central bank.
    Asset prices soared Thursday as investors took Powell at his word that the unusually outsized move wasn’t in response to a substantial weakening of the economy but rather an effort to shore up the labor market.
    “It really allows him to push this narrative that this easing cycle is not about us being in recession, it is about extending the economic expansion,” PGIM economist Tom Porcelli said. “I think it’s a really powerful idea.”

    Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has unveiled his latest buzzword to describe monetary policy, with a “recalibration” of policy at a pivotal moment for the central bank.
    At his news conference following Wednesday’s open market committee meeting, Powell used variations of the word no fewer than eight times as he sought to explain why the Fed took the unusual step of a half percentage point rate cut absent an obvious economic weakening.

    “This recalibration of our policy stance will help maintain the strength of the economy and the labor market, and will continue to enable further progress on inflation as we begin the process of moving forward a more neutral stance,” Powell said.
    Financial markets weren’t quite sure what to make of the chair’s messaging in the meeting’s immediate aftermath.
    However, asset prices soared Thursday as investors took Powell at his word that the unusually outsized move wasn’t in response to a substantial slowing of the economy. Rather, it was an opportunity to “recalibrate” Fed policy away from a rigid focus on inflation to a broader effort to make sure a recent weakening of the labor market didn’t get out of hand.
    The Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 jumped to new highs in trading Thursday after swinging violently Wednesday.
    “Policy had been calibrated for meaningfully higher inflation. With the inflation rate now drifting close to target, the Fed can remove some of that aggressive tightening that they put into place,” said Tom Porcelli, chief U.S. economist at PGIM Fixed Income.

    “It really allows him to push this narrative that this easing cycle is not about us being in recession, it is about extending the economic expansion,” he added. “I think it’s a really powerful idea. It’s something we had been hoping that he would do.”

    Powell’s buzzwords

    Several of Powell’s previous efforts to provide buzzy descriptions of Fed policy or its views on the economy haven’t worked out so well.
    In 2018, his characterizations of the efforts to reduce its bond holdings as being on “autopilot,” as well as his assessment that a string of rate hikes the same year had brought the Fed “a long way” from a neutral interest rate spurred blowback from markets.
    More famously, his insistence that an inflation surge in 2021 would prove “transitory” ended up causing the Fed to be slow-footed on policy to the point where it had to enact a series of three-quarter percentage point rate increases to pull down inflation.
    But markets expressed confidence in Powell’s latest assessment, despite this track record and some signs of cracks in the economy.

    “In other contexts, a larger move may convey greater concern about growth, but Powell repeatedly stressed this was basically a joyous cut as ebbing inflation allows the Fed to act to preserve a strong labor market,” Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist at JPMorgan Chase, said in a client note. “Moreover, if policy is set optimally, it should return the economy to a favorable place over time.”
    Still Feroli expects the Fed will have to follow up Wednesday’s action with a similar-sized move at the Nov. 6-7 meeting unless the labor market reverses a slowing pattern that began in April.
    There was some good news on the jobs front Thursday, as the Labor Department reported that weekly claims for unemployment benefits slid to 219,000, the lowest since May.

    An unusual move lower

    The half percentage point — or 50 basis point — cut was remarkable in that it’s the first time the Fed has gone beyond its traditional quarter-point moves absent a looming recession or crisis.
    Though Powell did not give credence to the notion that the move was a makeup call for not cutting at the July meeting, speculation on Wall Street was that the central bank indeed was playing catch-up to some degree.
    “This is a matter of maybe he felt like they were getting a little bit behind,” said Dan North, senior economist for North America at Allianz Trade. “A 50 basis point cut is pretty unusual. It’s been a long time, and I think it was maybe the last labor market report that gave him pause.”
    Indeed, Powell has made no secret of his concerns about the labor market, and stated Wednesday that getting in front of a potential weakening was an important motivator behind the recalibration.
    “The Fed still sees the economy as healthy and the labor market as solid, but Powell noted that it is time to recalibrate policy,” wrote Seth Carpenter, chief global economist at Morgan Stanley. “Powell has stressed and proven with this rate cut that the FOMC is willing to move gradually or make bigger moves depending on the incoming data and evolution of risks.”

    Carpenter is among the group that expects the Fed now can dial down its accommodation back to quarter-point increments through the rest of this year and into the first half of 2025.
    Futures markets traders, though, are pricing in a more aggressive pace that would entail a quarter-point cut in November but back to a half-point move in December, according to the CME Group’s FedWatch gauge.
    Bank of America economist Aditya Bhave noted a change in the Fed’s post-meeting statement that included a reference to seeking “maximum employment,” a mention he took to indicate that the central bank is ready to stay aggressive if the jobs picture continues to deteriorate.
    That also means the recalibration could get tricky.
    “We think the Fed will end up front-loading rate cuts more than it has indicated,” Bhave said in a note. “The labor market is likely to remain tepid, and we think markets will push to do another super-sized cut in 4Q.”

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More