More stories

  • in

    Inflation rate slipped to 2.1% in April, lower than expected, Fed’s preferred gauge shows

    Inflation barely budged in April as tariffs President Donald Trump implemented in the early part of the month had yet to show up in consumer prices, the Commerce Department reported Friday.
    The personal consumption expenditures price index, the Federal Reserve’s key inflation measure, increased just 0.1% for the month, putting the annual inflation rate at 2.1%. The monthly reading was in line with the Dow Jones consensus forecast while the annual level was 0.1 percentage point lower.

    Excluding food and energy, the core reading that tends to get even greater focus from Fed policymakers showed readings of 0.1% and 2.5%, against respective estimates of 0.1% and 2.6%.
    Consumer spending, though, slowed sharply for the month, posting just a 0.2% increase, in line with the consensus but slower than the 0.7% rate in March. A more cautious consumer mood also was reflected in the personal savings rate, which jumped to 4.9%, up from 0.6 percentage point in March to the highest level in nearly a year.
    Personal income surged 0.8%, a slight increase from the prior month but well ahead of the forecast for 0.3%.
    Markets showed little reaction to the news, with stock futures continuing to point lower and Treasury yields mixed.

    People shop at a grocery store in Brooklyn on May 13, 2025 in New York City.
    Spencer Platt | Getty Images

    Trump has been pushing the Fed to lower its key interest rate as inflation has continued to gravitate back to the central bank’s 2% target. However, policymakers have been hesitant to move as they await the longer-term impacts of the president’s trade policy.

    On Thursday, Trump and Fed Chair Jerome Powell held their first face-to-face meeting since the president started his second term. However, a Fed statement indicated the future path of monetary policy was not discussed and stressed that decisions would be made free of political considerations.
    Trump slapped across-the-board 10% duties on all U.S. imports, part of an effort to even out a trading landscape in which the U.S. ran a record $140.5 billion deficit in March. In addition to the general tariffs, Trump launched selective reciprocal tariffs much higher than the 10% general charge.
    Since then, though, Trump has backed off the more severe tariffs in favor of a 90-day negotiating period with the affected countries. Earlier this week, an international court struck down the tariffs, saying Trump exceeded his authority and didn’t prove that national security was threatened by the trade issues.
    Then in the latest installment of the drama, an appeals court allowed a White House effort for a temporary stay of the order from the U.S. Court of International Trade.
    Economists worry that tariffs could spark another round of inflation, though the historical record shows that their impact is often minimal.
    At their policy meeting earlier this month, Fed officials also expressed worry about potential tariff inflation, particularly at a time when concerns are rising about the labor market. Higher prices and slower economic growth can yield stagflation, a phenomenon the U.S. hasn’t seen since the early 1980s. More

  • in

    Trump Makes a New Push to ‘Decouple’ U.S. From China

    Trump administration officials are getting a second chance to try to sever ties with China by starting a trade war, imposing export controls and revoking student visas.The Trump administration has threatened to revoke the visas of many of the 277,000 or so Chinese students in the United States and to subject future applicants from China, including Hong Kong, to extra scrutiny.Cargo ships laden with goods from China stopped coming into American ports earlier this spring as President Trump escalated his trade war against Beijing.And the Trump administration is suspending sales of some critical U.S. technologies to China, including those related to jet engines, semiconductors and certain chemicals and machinery. Taken together, the actions by the Trump administration amount to an aggressive campaign to “decouple” the United States from China, as it seeks to break the close commercial ties between the world’s two largest economies and toss away what had been the anchor of the relations between the nations for decades.Aggressive decoupling would bolster American security, from the perspective of Mr. Trump and his aides. And it would also accelerate a trend toward each power being entrenched in its own regional sphere of influence.Officials in the first Trump administration spoke of the need to decouple from China, with the view that economic and educational ties across many fields equated to a national security threat. But while the efforts reframed the relationship as one of competition rather than cooperation, the volume of trade remained high, even through the pandemic.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    Tariff Ruling Gives Businesses Hope, but They’re Soon Unmoored Again

    Companies welcomed a court decision striking down President Trump’s tariffs. Then a stay of that ruling left no one breathing easy.Emma Mcilroy’s apparel company, Wildfang, had been working overtime to move its production out of China in the months since President Trump launched his trade war. Finding another factory that could produce jumpsuits and button-downs — while every other U.S. importer was also jockeying for space — was a huge drain on the 11-person staff’s attention.But when Ms. Mcilroy saw on Wednesday night that a federal court had ruled most of Mr. Trump’s tariffs illegal, all of that work paused. Would the tariffs be gone when her next shipment arrived in August, or not?“I have absolutely no idea where it’s going. I am learning in real time how to run my business,” Ms. Mcilroy said Thursday. “Yesterday I would’ve told you, ‘Yes, absolutely, you’re going to see me manufacturing stuff in Vietnam.’ Today I’m not sure.”American businesses are rapidly digesting the latest twist in Mr. Trump’s roller-coaster trade war, which has made it impossible to plan more than a few weeks in advance. It’s particularly hard on industries that place their orders entire seasons ahead of time.The details of Wednesday’s decision seemed likely to bring relief. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled that the Trump administration had acted illegally in using an emergency powers law to impose 30 percent tariffs on goods from China, 25 percent tariffs on most goods from Mexico and Canada, and 10 percent on everyone else. The court gave the White House 10 days to halt the new duties.Hours later, a higher court stayed the decision.If the initial ruling sticks, it will preclude the return of steeper “reciprocal” tariffs that Mr. Trump paused for 90 days in early April. It might even allow companies that have paid the emergency tariffs over the past several months to claim refunds, already an established process at Customs and Border Protection.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    Trump Criticizes the Fed in a Private Meeting With Powell

    Jerome H. Powell stressed in his first meeting since the president returned to the White House that policy decisions would be “based solely on careful, objective and nonpolitical analysis.”President Trump revived his criticism of the Federal Reserve in a private meeting with its chair, Jerome H. Powell, on Thursday, saying it was a mistake not to lower interest rates.The meeting, which was organized at Mr. Trump’s request, is the first since the president returned to the White House.Mr. Powell and Mr. Trump discussed how the economy was evolving with regards to inflation, the labor market and growth. The chair did not share his expectations for monetary policy, the Fed said in a statement.He told the president that such decisions would “depend entirely on incoming economic information and what that means for the outlook,” according to the statement, and would be “based solely on careful, objective and nonpolitical analysis.”Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, told reporters on Thursday that Mr. Trump expressed his belief to Mr. Powell that the Fed was making a mistake by not lowering interest rates.The meeting comes at a fraught moment for the economy, which now faces a variety of risks stemming from Mr. Trump’s policies. That has complicated the Fed’s job as it seeks to stamp out the remaining pressures on prices stemming from the pandemic and contain new ones that surface as a result of the tariffs, while also supporting a labor market that has begun to slow.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    Trump advisor Hassett is confident tariffs will prevail despite judges’ ruling

    Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said he fully believes the administration’s efforts to use tariffs to ensure fair trade are perfectly legal and will resume soon.
    The comments follow a ruling from judges on the Court of International Trade who said Trump exceeded his authority on tariffs.

    National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett speaks to reporters at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 14, 2025. 
    Kevin Lamarque | Reuters

    A top economic advisor to President Donald Trump expressed confidence Thursday that court rulings throwing out aggressive tariffs will be overturned on appeal.
    Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said in an interview that he fully believes the administration’s efforts to use tariffs to ensure fair trade are perfectly legal and will resume soon.

    “We’re right that America has been mishandled by other governments,” Hassett said during a Fox Business interview. “This trade negotiation season has been really, really effective for the American people.”
    The comments follow a ruling from judges on the Court of International Trade who said Trump exceeded his authority on tariffs, which are aimed both at combating barriers against American goods abroad and stemming the flow of fentanyl across the U.S. border.
    While the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has said that fentanyl is the primary driver in domestic overdose deaths, the judges ruled that related tariffs “fail because they do not deal with the threats set forth in those orders.”
    Hassett bristled at the ruling and said the administration will continue its anti-fentanyl efforts.
    “These activist judges are trying to slow down something right in the middle of really important negotiations,” he said. “The idea that the fentanyl crisis in America is not an emergency is so appalling to me that I am sure that when we appeal, this decision will be overturned.”

    The administration has multiple options to get around the judges’ ruling, including other sections of trade laws it can utilize. However, Hassett said that’s not the plan at the moment.
    “The fact is that there are measures that we can take with different numbers that we can start right now. There are different approaches that would take a couple of months to put these in place,” he said. “We’re not planning to pursue those right now, because we’re very very confident that this ruling is incorrect.”

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    U.S. Pauses Exports of Jet Engine and Chip Technology to China

    President Trump has stopped some critical products and technologies made only in the United States from flowing to China, flexing the government’s power over global supply chains.The Trump administration has suspended some sales to China of critical U.S. technologies, including those related to jet engines, semiconductors and certain chemicals. The move is a response to China’s recent restrictions on exports of critical minerals to the United States, a decision by Beijing that has threatened to cripple U.S. company supply chains, according to two people familiar with the matter.The new limits are pushing the world’s largest economies a step closer toward supply chain warfare, as Washington and Beijing try to flex their power over essential economic components in an attempt to gain the upper hand in an intensifying trade conflict.The standoff could have significant implications for companies that depend on foreign technologies, including makers of airplanes, robots cars and semiconductors.It could also complicate efforts to negotiate an end to a trade fight over the administration’s tariff policies. On May 12, negotiators from the two countries agreed to reduce the punishing tariffs they have imposed on each other for 90 days while negotiators sought a longer-term resolution.Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, said at the time that “the consensus from both delegations is that neither side wanted a decoupling.” Yet the administration continues to target China with punitive measures.Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced on Wednesday that the United States would “aggressively revoke” visas for Chinese students who study in critical fields or who connections to the Chinese Communist Party.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    Credit default swaps are back in fashion — even if the panic might be overblown

    The cost of insuring exposure to U.S. government debt has been rising.
    Investors are pricing in the increased concerns around the unresolved debt ceiling, several industry watchers said.
    The surge in CDS prices is likely a “short-lived” reaction while traders wait for a new budget deal to raise the debt limit.

    Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) at the opening bell on May 27, 2025, in New York City.
    Timothy A. Clary | Afp | Getty Images

    Investors are getting nervous the U.S. government might struggle to pay its debt — and they are snapping up insurance in case it defaults.
    The cost of insuring exposure to U.S. government debt has been rising steadily and is hovering near its highest level in two years, according to LSEG data.

    Spreads or premiums on U.S. 1-year credit default swaps were up at 52 basis points as of Wednesday from 16 basis points at the start of this year, LSEG data showed.
    Credit default swaps are like insurance for investors. Buyers pay a fee to protect themselves in case the borrower — in this case the U.S. government — can’t repay their debt. When the cost of insuring the U.S. debt goes up, it’s a sign that investors are getting nervous.
    Spreads on the CDS with 5-year tenor were at nearly 50 basis points compared with about 30 basis points at the start of the year. In a CDS contract, the buyer pays a recurring premium known as the spread to the seller. If a borrower, in this case, the U.S. government defaults on its debt, the seller must compensate the buyer.

    CDS prices reflect how risky a borrower seems and are used to guard against signs of financial trouble, not just a full-blown default, said Rong Ren Goh, portfolio manager in Eastspring Investments’ fixed income team.
    The recent surge in demand for CDS contracts is a “hedge against political risk, not insolvency,” said Goh, underscoring the broader anxiety about U.S. fiscal policy and “political dysfunction,” rather than a market view that the government is verging on failing to meet its obligation.

    Investors are pricing in the increased concerns around the unresolved debt ceiling, several industry watchers said.
    “The credit default swaps have become popular again as the debt ceiling remains unresolved,” said Freddy Wong, head of Asia Pacific at Invesco fixed income, pointing out that the U.S. Treasury has reached the statutory debt limit in January 2025.
    The Congressional Budget Office said in a March notice that the Treasury had already reached the current debt limit of $36.1 trillion and had no room to borrow, “other than to replace maturing debt.”
    Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said earlier this month that his department was tallying the federal tax receipts collected around April 15 filing deadline to come up with a more precise forecast for the so-called “X-date,” referring to when the U.S. government will exhaust its borrowing capacity.
    Data from Morningstar shows that spikes in CDS spreads on U.S. government debt have typically aligned with periods of heightened worries around U.S. government’s debt limit, particularly in 2011, 2013 and in 2023.
    Wong pointed out that there are still several months before the U.S. reaches the X-date.
    The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a major tax cut package which could reportedly see the debt ceiling raised by $4 trillion, pending approval from the Senate.
    In a May 9 letter, Bessent urged congressional leaders to extend the debt ceiling by July, before Congress leaves for its annual August recess, in order to avert economic calamity, but warned “significant uncertainty” in the exact date.
    “There is still enough time for the Senate to pass its version of the bill by late July to avoid a technical default in U.S. Treasury,” added Wong.
    During the debt ceiling crisis in 2023, the U.S. Congress passed a bill suspending the debt ceiling just days before the U.S. government entered into a technical default.
    In the past, the U.S. has come dangerously close to a default but in each case, Congress acted last minute to raise or suspend the ceiling.

    Fiscal reckoning

    The surge in CDS prices is likely a “short-lived” reaction while investors wait for a new budget deal to raise the debt limit. It is unlikely a sign of an impending financial crisis, according to industry watchers.
    During the 2008 financial meltdown, institutions and investors actively traded CDS linked to mortgage-backed securities, many of which were filled with high-risk subprime loans. When mortgage defaults soared, these securities plummeted in value, resulting in enormous CDS payout obligations.
    However, the implications for soaring demand for sovereign CDS are very different compared to demand for corporate CDS which was the case in 2008, where investors were making an actual call about growing default risk at corporations, said Spencer Hakimian, founder of Tolou Capital Management.
    “Traders seem to believe that CDS provides a speculative instrument for betting on a government debt crisis, which I view as extremely unlikely,” said Ed Yardeni, president of Yardeni Research, who added that the the U.S. will “always prioritize” paying interest on its debt.
    “The U.S. government won’t default on its debt. The fear that it might do so is not justified,” he told CNBC.
    Moody’s earlier this month downgraded the U.S. sovereign credit rating to Aa1 from Aaa, citing the government’s deteriorating fiscal health. 
    Should the Senate pass the bill in time, the massive ceiling increase will push up the Treasury supply, putting the U.S. fiscal deficit condition back in the spotlight, Wong warned. More

  • in

    Elon Musk says Trump’s spending bill undermines the work DOGE has been doing

    Elon Musk said the “big, beautiful bill” will not help the nation’s finances, in an interview to be aired on “CBS Sunday Morning.”
    “I think a bill can be big or it could be beautiful, but I don’t know if it could be both,” Musk said.

    U.S. President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, alongside Musk’s son X Æ A-Xii, speak to the press as they stand next to a Tesla vehicle on the South Portico of the White House in Washington, D.C., on March 11, 2025.
    Mandel Ngan | AFP | Getty Images

    Elon Musk criticized the Republican spending bill that recently made it through a House vote, saying it counters the work he’s been doing to reduce wasteful government spending.
    In an interview to be aired June 1 on “CBS Sunday Morning,” the richest man in the world and the head of the Department of Government Efficiency advisory board said the “big, beautiful bill” will not help the nation’s finances.

    “I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decrease it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing,” Musk said in a clip the program shared on social media platform X.
    DOGE says it has saved $170 billion in taxpayer money since it began in January, targeting areas of government waste and redundancy in sometimes-controversial ways.
    For instance, it has gutted the U.S. Agency for International Development and reduced staff elsewhere. DOGE-related moves have been responsible for some 275,000 government layoffs, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas, a consultancy firm.
    The sweeping One Big Beautiful Bill Act by contrast, is projected to raise the federal budget deficit by $3.8 trillion over the next 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The deficit is on track in 2025 to run close to $2 trillion, with the national debt now at $36.2 trillion.
    “I think a bill can be big or it could be beautiful, but I don’t know if it could be both,” Musk said in the clip.

    Trump and congressional Republicans counter that the bill reduces spending in key areas and will generate enough growth to compensate for the tax reductions. The legislation, though, is expected to face strong resistance in the Senate.
    For his part, Musk has pulled back his DOGE work, saying he plans to focus on running his companies, which include X, Tesla and SpaceX. Musk had been a frequent presence in the White House since Trump’s election.
    In an interview with The Washington Post published Tuesday, Musk said the federal bureaucracy is “much worse than I realized” and that DOGE became “the whipping boy for everything.” More