More stories

  • in

    Harris Will Back Federal Ban on Price Gouging, Campaign Says

    Vice President Kamala Harris will call for a federal ban on corporate price gouging on groceries in a speech laying out her economic agenda on Friday, campaign officials said late Wednesday, in an effort to blame big companies for persistently high costs of American consumer staples.The plan includes large overlaps with efforts that the Biden administration has pursued for several years to target corporate consolidation and price gouging, including attempts to stoke more competition in the meat industry and the Federal Trade Commission’s lawsuit this year that seeks to block the merger of two large grocery retailers, Kroger and Albertsons.It also follows through on what people familiar with Ms. Harris’s forthcoming economic agenda said this week would be a centerpiece of her plans: an aggressive rhetorical attempt to shift the blame for high inflation onto corporate America. Polls show that argument resonates strongly with voters, including independent voters who could decide the November election.Progressive groups have urged President Biden, and now Ms. Harris, to fully embrace that argument.In a release announcing the policy, Harris campaign officials did not detail how a price-gouging ban would be enforced or what current corporate behaviors would be outlawed if it were enacted. They said Ms. Harris would work in her first 100 days to put in place a federal ban “setting clear rules of the road to make clear that big corporations can’t unfairly exploit consumers to run up excessive corporate profits on food and groceries.”The officials also said Ms. Harris would authorize the Federal Trade Commission to impose “harsh penalties” on corporations that fix prices. They said that she would direct more resources toward investigating price-gouging in the supply chain for meat and that she would push federal officials to closely scrutinize proposed grocery mergers.They also said that Ms. Harris would unveil plans on Friday related to housing costs and prescription drug prices. Many states ban price gouging, but the federal government does not.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    Annual inflation rate slows to 2.9% in July, lowest since 2021

    Signs reading, ‘please bear with us: we are currently experiencing interruptions in our supply chain which may affect the availability of certain products,’ is seen taped to the drive-up menu at a Wendy’s restaurant on May 06, 2020 in Miami, Florida. 
    Joe Raedle | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    Inflation rose as expected in July, driven by higher housing-related costs, according to a Labor Department report Wednesday that is likely to keep an interest rate cut on the table in September.
    The consumer price index, a broad-based measure of prices for goods and services, increased 0.2% for the month, putting the 12-month inflation rate at 2.9%. Economists surveyed by Dow Jones had been looking for respective readings of 0.2% and 3%.

    Excluding food and energy, core CPI came in at a 0.2% monthly increase and a 3.2% annual rate, meeting expectations.

    The annual rate is the lowest since March 2021, while the core is the lowest since April 2021, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics report. Headline inflation was 3% in June.
    A 0.4% increase in shelter costs was responsible for 90% of the all-items inflation increase. Food prices increased 0.2% while energy was flat.
    Stock market futures were mildly negative after the report while Treasury yields were mostly higher.

    Though food inflation was soft on the month, multiple categories saw sizeable increases, most notably eggs, which were up 5.5%. Cereals and bakery items declined 0.5% while dairy and related products fell 0.2%.

    Inflation readings have been gradually drifting back to the central bank’s 2% target. A report Tuesday from the Labor Department showed that producer prices, a proxy for wholesale inflation, rose just 0.1% in July and were up 2.2% year over year.
    Fed officials have indicated a willingness to ease, though they’ve been careful not to commit to a specific timetable nor to speculate about the pace at which cuts might occur. Futures market pricing currently points to about an even chance of a quarter- or half-percentage point reduction at the Sept. 17-18 meeting and at least a full point in moves by the end of 2024.
    As inflation has eased, percolating concerns about a slowing labor market seemed to have raised the likelihood that the Fed will start cutting for the first time since the early days of the Covid crisis.
    “Coming down but the sticky areas continue to be sticky,” Liz Ann Sonders, chief investment strategist at Charles Schwab, said in describing the CPI report. “We have to keep a close eye on both the inflation data as well as the employment data.”
    There were several crosscurrents in the report that indeed suggest inflation is stubborn in some areas.
    This is breaking news. Please check back for updates. More

  • in

    Kamala Harris Set to Lay Out Economic Agenda in North Carolina Speech

    Vice President Kamala Harris’s sudden ascent to the top of the Democratic ticket has generated a host of questions about her economic agenda, including how much she will stick to the details of President Biden’s positions, tweak them, or chart entirely new ones.When she begins to roll out her policy vision this week, Ms. Harris is likely to answer only some of those questions.During an economy-focused speech on Friday in Raleigh, N.C., Ms. Harris will outline a sort of reboot of the administration’s economic agenda, according to four people familiar with Ms. Harris’s plans.She will lay out an approach relatively light on details, they said. It will shift emphasis from Mr. Biden’s focus on job creation and made-in-America manufacturing, and toward efforts to rein in the cost of living. But it will rarely break from Mr. Biden on substance.That strategy reflects the advice economic aides have given Ms. Harris: to be clear and bold in talking about the economy, but not overly specific.Her ability to do that has been effectively enabled by the unusual circumstances of Mr. Biden’s abrupt departure from the presidential race, which allowed Ms. Harris to secure the Democratic nomination without enduring a long primary campaign.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    Wednesday’s big CPI inflation report could mark a change in thinking for the Fed

    Economists surveyed by Dow Jones expect the consumer price index, to be released Wednesday at 8:30 a.m. ET, to show 0.2% increases on both the all-items reading and the core measurement.
    A positive CPI reading could mean the Federal Reserve is able to turn its gaze to other economic challenges, such as the slowing labor market.
    “Inflation is almost a nonissue at this point. There’s this broad expectation that the worst is easily behind us,” said Jim Baird, chief investment officer at Plante Moran Financial Advisors.

    Product prices as seen at Walmart. 
    Courtesy: Walmart

    The news Tuesday was good for inflation, and investors hope it will get even better Wednesday when the Labor Department releases the July consumer price index report.
    With the score being one down, one to go on confirming that the early-year jump in prices either was a fluke or the last gasp of inflation, a positive CPI reading could mean the Federal Reserve is able to turn its gaze to other economic challenges, such as the slowing labor market.

    “At this point, the inflationary pressure that we saw build has really been dissipated significantly,” said Jim Baird, chief investment officer at Plante Moran Financial Advisors. “Inflation is almost a nonissue at this point. There’s this broad expectation that the worst is easily behind us.”
    Like others on Wall Street, Baird expects the Fed in September to shift its focus from tight policy to tackle inflation to a somewhat easier stance to head off a potential weakening in the jobs picture.
    While consumers and business owners continue to express concern over high prices, the trend indeed has shifted. Tuesday’s producer price index, or PPI, report for July helped confirm optimism that the elevated inflation numbers that began in 2021 and spiked again in early 2024 are in the rearview mirror.

    The PPI report, seen as a gauge of wholesale inflation, showed prices up just 0.2% in July and about 2.2% from a year ago. That number is now very close to the Fed’s 2% goal and indicative that the market’s impulse for the central bank to start cutting rates is about on target.
    Economists surveyed by Dow Jones expect the CPI similarly to show 0.2% increases on both the all-items reading and the core measurement that excludes food and energy. However, that is projected to show respective 12-month rates of 3% and 3.2% — well below their mid-2022 highs but still a good distance from the Fed’s 2% target.

    Still, investors are looking for the Fed at its September meeting to start cutting interest rates, considering that inflation is weakening and so is the labor market. The unemployment rate has now risen to 4.3%, a 0.8 percentage point increase over the past year that has triggered a time-tested recession flag known as the Sahm Rule.
    “Given the focus on the relative weakening in the labor market, given the fact inflation is coming down pretty rapidly, and I expect it will continue over the next few months, it would be a surprise if the Fed didn’t start moving towards easing very quickly, presumably at the September meeting,” Baird said. “If they don’t at the September meeting, the market is not going to take kindly to that.”

    Worries over slow Fed response

    A brief pickup in weekly initial unemployment claims, combined with other weakening economic metrics, briefly had some in the market looking for an emergency rate cut.
    While that sentiment has dissipated, there’s still worry about the Fed being slow to ease, just as it was slow to tighten when inflation began to escalate.
    Another benign inflation report “makes the Fed completely comfortable that they can shift their focus away from inflation and toward labor,” said Tom Porcelli, chief U.S. economist at PGIM Fixed Income. “They could have shifted their attention from inflation to labor … months ago. There are cracks forming in the labor market backdrop.”
    Amid the twin realities of declining inflation and rising unemployment, markets are pricing in the absolutely certainty of a rate cut at the Sept. 17-18 Fed meeting, with the only question left being how much. Futures pricing is roughly split between a quarter- or half-point reduction, and leaning heavily to the likelihood of a full percentage point reduction by the end of the year, according to CME Group calculations.
    However, futures pricing has been well off the mark for most of the year. Traders started the year anticipating a rapid pace of cuts, then pulled back into expecting only one or two before the latest swing in the other direction.
    “I’m as curious about [Wednesday’s] inflation report as anyone else, but I think it would take a real outlier to change the Fed’s tune from 1) shifting to labor as its focus, and 2) seriously thinking about cutting in September,” Porcelli said. “They should start off aggressively. I can easily make the argument for the Fed to cut 50 basis points just to kick things off because I think they should have been cutting already. I don’t think that’s what they will do. They’ll start it off modestly.” More

  • in

    How Food Prices Have Changed During the Biden Administration

    Grocery prices are no longer rising as rapidly, but food inflation remains a top issue for voters, polls show.A central issue has plagued the Biden administration for most of its term: the steep rise in grocery prices.Polls have consistently found that inflation remains a top concern for voters, who have seen their budgets squeezed. A YouGov poll published last month found that 64 percent of Americans said inflation was a “very serious problem.” And when it comes to inflation, several surveys suggested that Americans were most concerned about grocery prices.Despite the gloom about grocery costs, food price increases have generally been cooling for months. On Wednesday, new data on inflation for July will show if the trend has continued.Economists in a Bloomberg survey think that inflation overall probably climbed by 3 percent from a year earlier, in line with a 3 percent rise in June. That sort of reading would probably keep officials at the Federal Reserve on track to cut interest rates in September. Investors, who were recently rattled by signs of an economic slowdown, have looked to rate cuts as a support for markets.Some voters have blamed President Biden for rising prices, pointing out that food costs have soared over the past four years. Former President Donald J. Trump, when accepting the Republican nomination last month, highlighted grocery costs and said that he would “make America affordable again.”In the year through June, grocery prices rose 1.1 percent, a significant slowdown from a recent peak of 13.5 percent in August 2022. Many consumers might not be feeling relief, though, because food prices overall have not fallen but have continued to increase, albeit at a slower rate. Compared with four years ago, grocery prices are up about 20 percent.

    .dw-chart-subhed {
    line-height: 1;
    margin-bottom: 6px;
    font-family: nyt-franklin;
    color: #121212;
    font-size: 15px;
    font-weight: 700;
    }

    Annual change in grocery prices for U.S. consumers
    Year-over-year change in average for “food at home” index, not seasonally adjusted.Source: Bureau of Labor StatisticsBy The New York TimesWe are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    Wholesale inflation measure rose 0.1% in July, less than expected

    The producer price index, a measure of wholesale inflation, increased 0.1% on the month, less than 0.2% forecast. PPI excluding food and energy was flat.
    On a year-over-year basis, headline PPI rose 2.2%, a sharp drop from the 2.7% reading in June.

    A key measure of wholesale inflation rose less than expected in July, opening the door further for the Federal Reserve to start lowering interest rates.
    The producer price index, which measures selling prices that producers get for goods and services, increased 0.1% on the month, the Labor Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Tuesday. Excluding volatile food and energy components, the core PPI was flat.

    Economists surveyed by Dow Jones had been looking for an increase of 0.2% on both the all-items and the core readings.
    A further core measure that also excludes trade services showed a rise of 0.3%.
    On a year-over-year basis, the headline PPI increased 2.2%, a sharp drop from the 2.7% reading in June.
    Stock market futures rose following the news while Treasury yields moved lower.
    The wholesale inflation reading was relatively tame despite a 0.6% jump in final demand goods prices, the biggest move higher since February and due primarily to a 1.9% surge in energy, including a 2.8% increase in gasoline.

    Countering the move was a 0.2% slide in services, the biggest move lower since March 2023, according to the BLS. Trade services prices fell 1.3% while margins for machinery and vehicles wholesaling tumbled 4.1%. An increase of 2.3% in portfolio management offset some of the decline in services prices.
    The PPI is considered a leading indicator for inflation as it gauges pipeline inflation from the perspective of manufacturers and suppliers of goods and services. Its counterpart, to be released Wednesday, is the consumer price index, which measures the actual prices consumers pay in the marketplace. Economists also expect 0.2% monthly increases for both headline and core CPI.
    Both measures are watched closely for inflation signs. Though the Fed more closely focuses on the Commerce Department’s personal consumption expenditures price index, the CPI and PPI both feed into that calculation.
    The latest inflation data comes with markets fully pricing in an interest rate cut at the September meeting of the Fed’s open market committee. The main question now is whether the central bank will cut by a quarter or a half percentage point. The futures market currently rates it a toss-up.
    Fed officials have vowed to keep up the inflation fight until they have reached their 2% goal, and the latest data for the most part has been cooperating.
    A survey the New York Fed released Monday showed that consumers’ view of inflation three years from now fell to 2.3%, the lowest in the 11-year history of the survey.
    Moreover, the survey also showed consumers, particularly at the lower end of the income scale, are beginning to suffer more from inflation. For instance, the perceived likelihood of missing a minimum debt payment in the next three months jumped to 13.3%, the highest since April 2020, with the biggest part of the 1 percentage point monthly increase coming from households with annual income below $50,000.
    Expectations for credit access also declined, and household spending expectations over the next year fell to their lowest level since April 2021.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Three-year inflation outlook hits record low in New York Fed consumer survey

    The New York Fed’s Survey of Consumer Expectations put the three-year inflation outlook at 2.3%, the lowest in a data series going back to June 2013.
    Household spending is expected to increase by 4.9%, which is 0.2 percentage point lower than in June and the lowest reading since April 2021.

    People shop at a grocery store in Brooklyn on July 11, 2024 in New York City.
    Spencer Platt | Getty Images

    Consumers grew more confident in July that inflation will be less of a problem in the coming years, according to a New York Federal Reserve report Monday that showed the three-year outlook at a new low.
    The latest views from the monthly Survey of Consumer Expectations indicate that respondents see inflation staying elevated over the next year but then receding in the next couple of years after that.

    In fact, the three-year portion of the survey showed consumers expecting inflation at just 2.3%, down 0.6 percentage point from June and the lowest in the history of the survey, going back to June 2013.
    The results come with investors on edge about the state of inflation and whether the Federal Reserve might be able to reduce interest rates as soon as next month. Economists view expectations as a key for inflation as consumers and business owners will adjust their behavior if they think prices and labor costs are likely to continue to rise.
    On Wednesday, the Labor Department will release its own monthly inflation reading, the consumer price index, which is expected to show an increase of 0.2% in July and an annual rate of 3%, Dow Jones estimates show. That’s still a full percentage point away from the Fed’s 2% goal but about one-third of where it was two years ago.
    Markets have fully priced in the likelihood of at least a quarter percentage point rate cut in September and a strong likelihood that the Fed will lower by a full percentage point by the end of the year.
    While the medium-term outlook improved, inflation expectations on the one- and five-year horizons stood unchanged at 3% and 2.8%, respectively.

    However, there was some other good inflation news in the survey.
    Respondents expect the price of gas to increase by 3.5% over the next year, 0.8 percentage point less than in June, and food to see a rise of 4.7%, which is 0.1 percentage point lower than a month ago.
    In addition, household spending is expected to increase by 4.9%, which is 0.2 percentage point lower than in June and the lowest reading since April 2021, right around the time when the current inflation surge began.
    Conversely, expectations rose for medical care, college education and rent costs. The outlook for college costs jumped to a 7.2% increase, up 1.9 percentage points, while the rent component — which has been particularly nettlesome for Fed officials who have been looking for housing costs to decline — is seen as rising by 7.1%, or 0.6 percentage point more than June.
    Expectations for employment brightened, despite the rising unemployment rate. The perceived probability of losing one’s job in the next year fell to 14.3%, down half a percentage point, while the expectation of leaving one’s job voluntarily, a proxy for worker confidence about opportunities in the labor market, climbed to 20.7%, a 0.2 percentage point increase for the highest reading since February 2023.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    U.S. Officials to Visit China for Economic Talks as Trade Tensions Rise

    The recently established U.S.-China Financial Working Group is set to meet for discussions about financial stability and curbing the flow of fentanyl.A group of senior Biden administration officials is traveling to Shanghai this week for a round of high-level meetings intended to keep the economic relationship between the United States and China on stable footing amid mounting trade tensions between the two countries.The talks will take place on Thursday and Friday and are being convened through the U.S.-China Financial Working Group, which was created last year. Officials are expected to discuss ways to maintain economic and financial stability, capital markets and efforts to curb the flow of fentanyl into the United States.Although communication between the United States and China has improved over the past year, the economic relationship remains fraught because of disagreements over industrial policy and China’s dominance over green energy technology. The Biden administration imposed new tariffs in May on an array of Chinese imports, including electric vehicles, solar cells, semiconductors and advanced batteries. The United States is also restricting American investments in Chinese sectors that policymakers believe could threaten national security.The U.S. delegation, which is scheduled to depart on Monday, is being led by Brent Neiman, the Treasury Department’s assistant secretary for international finance. He will be joined by officials from the Federal Reserve and the Securities and Exchange Commission. They are expected to meet with the People’s Bank of China’s deputy governor, Xuan Changneng, and other senior Chinese officials.“We intend for this F.W.G. meeting to include conversations on financial stability, issues related to cross-border data, lending and payments, private-sector efforts to advance transition finance, and concrete steps we can take to improve communication in the event of financial stress,” Mr. Neiman said ahead of the trip, referring to the abbreviation for the financial working group.Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen pressed Chinese officials during her trip to China in April to stop flooding global markets with cheap clean-energy products.Pool photo by Tatan SyuflanaAmerican and Chinese financial regulators have been conducting financial shock exercises this year to coordinate their responses in the event of a crisis, like a cyberattack or climate disaster, that might affect the international banking or insurance systems.The Biden administration has been urging China to take action to prevent chemicals used to produce fentanyl from being exported to other countries and smuggled into the United States. There were signs of progress this month when China announced that it would put new restrictions on three of these chemicals, a move that the United States described as a “valuable step forward.”Other economic issues between the two countries continue to be contentious. Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen pressed Chinese officials during her trip to China in April to stop flooding global markets with cheap clean-energy products, warning that its excess industrial capacity would distort global supply chains.But after a meeting of Communist Party leaders last month, there was little indication that China would retreat from its investments in high-tech manufacturing or take major steps toward rebalancing its economy by bolstering domestic consumption.The talks this week are the fifth meeting of the financial working group and will be the second time the officials have convened in China. More