More stories

  • in

    What Fed Chief Powell said about crypto that may have aided bitcoin’s rally to $100,000

    Bitcoin’s meteoric run may have gotten a little extra push from an unlikely source: Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.
    “It’s not a competitor for the dollar, it’s really a competitor for gold,” the central bank leader said Wednesday.

    Jerome Powell, chairman of the US Federal Reserve, during the New York Times DealBook Summit at Jazz at Lincoln Center in New York, US, on Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2024. 
    Yuki Iwamura | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Bitcoin’s meteoric run may have gotten a little extra push from an unlikely source: Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.
    In comments Wednesday about the cryptocurrency, the central bank leader noted that he does not and cannot own any himself. In addition, he said the Fed’s role in regulating bitcoin and its competitors is limited.

    However, he also maintained that bitcoin is not a challenge for traditional currencies like the U.S. dollar but rather gold.
    “People use bitcoin as a speculative asset,” Powell told CNBC’s Andrew Ross Sorkin during the New York Times’ DealBook conference. “It’s just like gold only it’s virtual, it’s digital. People are not using it as a form of payment or as a store of value. It’s highly volatile. It’s not a competitor for the dollar, it’s really a competitor for gold.”
    For those who watch the crypto markets, the Powell comments, whether unwittingly, provided a sense of legitimacy for bitcoin and helped drive another leg higher. Bitcoin jumped 4% in morning trade Thursday, pushing over the $103,000 mark.

    Stock chart icon

    Bitcoin’s rise

    “We believe the Fed chair’s comparison of bitcoin to gold is a significant development as it introduces another level of credibility to bitcoin as a major asset in global markets,” said Joel Kruger, market strategist at LMAX Group, which runs an exchange for currency and crypto trading.
    “The fact that gold is still about 10 times larger than bitcoin should offer additional insight into how much more room there is for bitcoin to grow from current levels,” he added.

    Bitcoin rose sharply to start the year then largely traded in a volatile but fairly tight range — until Donald Trump captured the presidential election on Nov. 5. Since then, it has soared close to 50% as the president-elect’s pro-crypto remarks have fueled another price surge that took bitcoin past the $100,000 mark Wednesday. By contrast, gold is about flat since the election, though it is up nearly 30% year to date.
    To be sure, how much Powell’s comments helped propel the last move is unknown.
    The remarks comparing it to bitcoin came the same day that Trump made formal his widely anticipated intention to nominate financier Paul Atkins, also a strong crypto supporter, as chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
    The position is a key regulatory post and could provide a smoother market ride particularly after the current SEC leader, Gary Gensler, has been an enemy of the crypto industry. More

  • in

    Remembering Art Cashin’s most valuable stock market lessons – and the stories behind them

    Art Cashin speaking at the NYSE on Dec. 30th, 2022. 

    Art Cashin, UBS’ director of floor operations and a fixture at the New York Stock Exchange for nearly 60 years, died this week at age 83. 
    Cashin was one of the great historians of the stock market, but he was not an academic. His method of teaching did not involve citing academic studies. Instead, he taught by telling stories.

    In an attempt to explain why people should think deeper about what they are doing, he often told stories that illustrated a favorite theme: Why the obvious answer is not always the correct answer. 

    Cuban Missile Crisis: Buy when the missiles are flying

    Cashin had to live through the constant specter of a nuclear attack in the early 1960s. One such incident taught him that sometimes investment decisions are not entirely logical.
    Back then, he was spending a considerable amount of time with one of his earliest mentors, an over-the-counter trader in silver stocks whom he called Professor Jack. Here’s how Cashin told it:
    “We were not quite to the Cuban Missile Crisis. We were getting there and I was still not a member yet. It was the early 60s, and word spread that something had happened and that the Russians had actually pressed the button and that the missiles were flying. The option market wasn’t on an exchange in those days, it was over-the-counter and you had to call around. I had virtually no money, and I was looking to see if I could make a $100 bet by buying a put or some such things. And everywhere I called I couldn’t get anything done. So I cleaned up and rushed down to the bar. And Professor Jack was already in the bar, and I came bursting through the doors as only a 19- or 20-year-old could. And I said, ‘Jack, Jack. The rumors are that the missiles are flying.’
    And he said, ‘Kid, sit down and buy me a drink.’

    And I sat down and he said, ‘Listen carefully. When you hear the missiles are flying, you buy them, you don’t sell them.’
    And I looked at him, and I said, ‘You buy them, you don’t sell them?’
    He said, ‘Of course, because if you’re wrong the trade will never clear. We’ll all be dead.'”

    How do you determine the right price?

    Cashin’s stories often illustrated some aspect of investing.
    Volumes have been written explaining the concept of “price discovery” — that is, how anyone determines what the right price to pay for a stock should be. Scholarly papers have been written about supply and demand, as well as the information available to buyers and sellers at the time of the transaction.
    To explain price discovery, Cashin liked to tell the story of the time the jeweler Charles Lewis Tiffany tried to sell an expensive diamond stickpin to John Pierpont Morgan.
    Tiffany, Cashin said, knew that J.P. Morgan loved diamond stickpins, which he used to put in his tie. One day, the jeweler sent a man around to Morgan’s office with an envelope and a box wrapped in gift paper. Morgan opened the envelope, and in it was a message from Tiffany: “My dear Mr. Morgan, I know of your great fascination with diamond stickpins. Enclosed in this box is an absolutely exquisite example. Since it is so exquisite and unusual, its price is $5,000.”

    In those days, Cashin noted, $5,000 was north of $150,000 in present dollars.
    The note continued: “My man will leave the stickpin with you and will return to my office. He will come back tomorrow. If you choose to accept it, you may give him a check for $5,000. If you choose not to accept it, you may give him the box back with the diamond stickpin.”
    The next day, Tiffany’s man came back to see Morgan.
    Morgan presented him with the box rewrapped in new paper, along with a note, which said, “My dear Mr. Tiffany, as you’ve said, the stickpin was magnificent. However, the price seems a bit excessive. Instead of $5,000, enclosed you will find a check for $4,000. If you choose to accept that, you may send the pin back to me, and if not, you may keep the pin and tear up the check.”
    The man returned to Tiffany, who read the note and saw the offer for $4,000. He knew he could still make money on the offer, but felt the pin was still worth the $5,000 he was asking.
    The jeweler said to the man, “You may return the check to Mr. Morgan, and tell him I hope to do business with him in the future.” Tiffany then took the wrapping off the box, opened it up and found not the stickpin, but a check for $5,000 and a note that said, “Just checking the price.” 

    How do smart people read the tape?

    Cashin passionately believed that the market reflected all available information — even if some were able to come to different conclusions than others. Often when the market moved for reasons that were not obvious, Cashin would come up with some plausible but not obvious reason why.
    He was fond of telling a story about a man who looked at the markets during a national disaster and read the tape in a very different way than everyone else.

    Art Cashin
    Adam Jeffery | CNBC

    It was Nov. 22, 1963 — the day President John F. Kennedy was assassinated.
    “I was upstairs,” Cashin told me, “And the market was selling off. And a broker on the floor, Tommy McKinnon, called up. I was in the order room. And he said, ‘Is there anything on the tape about the president?’
    And I said, ‘No. Why do you ask?’ And he said, ‘Merrill Lynch is all over the floor, selling.’ And I asked him why, and he said, ‘Something about the president.'”
    “So I went back. The news ticker had a bell that would ring once for ordinary news, twice for something that was special, and three for really dynamic news. And the bell rang three times. And I ran back about 15 feet to where the news ticker was. And the headline was, ‘Shots Reported Fired at President’s Motorcade in Dallas.’ And I ran back to call the floor of the Exchange to tell Tommy. And before he could pick up, the bell rang three times again. And it said, ‘President Rumored to Have Been Hit.’ And I went back to call him again. And again, the bell rang three times. And it said, ‘President’s Motorcade Diverted to Parkland Hospital in Dallas.’ And that’s when they shut the Exchange down.”
    “The amazing thing, to me, was how did Merrill Lynch know before anything was on the news ticker? And it was a lesson to me in Wall Street. Presidents didn’t travel much in 1963 and so the manager of the Merrill Lynch Dallas branch said, ‘You guys go out and watch the parade. I’ll keep a skeleton crew here.’ They went out to watch the parade. A little while later, they all came in down in the dumps. And he said, ‘What’s the matter? You were supposed to watch the parade.’ And they said to him, ‘The parade got cancelled.’ And he said, ‘What do you mean?’ And they were here. And the parade was way up there. And they heard the sirens go loud. And the parade turned right.”
    “And this guy was a good manager. And he called the salesmen together. And he said, ‘Give me a good bullish reason to pull the president out of a parade.’ And nobody could think of one. And he said, ‘Give me a bearish reason.’ Nobody thinks, assassination. They were nowhere near there. They were 10 blocks away. But they start thinking, nuclear catastrophe, natural disaster, blah, blah, blah. They find 100 reasons to sell. He said, ‘Begin to sell for the discretionary accounts. Start calling our clients. And tell them, ‘We think something bad happened at the parade.'” 
    For Cashin, that Merrill Lynch manager was the perfect stock market Sherlock Holmes: Don’t just consider what you hear. Think beyond what happened.

    How do you tell a story about the stock market?

    By the time I met Cashin in 1997, he had been writing a daily column, Cashin’s Comments, for nearly 20 years. It was estimated to reach as many as 2 million people a day. It invariably began with an analysis of an important event: “On this date in 1918, the worldwide flu epidemic went into high gear in the U.S.”
    After a brief history lesson, he tied that event to the day’s market events: “Pre-opening Wednesday morning, U.S. stock futures looked like they might be coming down with the flu. Several earnings reports were less than glowing and some of the outlooks were cloudy.”
    Cashin never took a course in literary theory, but he understood that some stories were far more persuasive than others. He knew that condensed narratives with a clear storytelling arc were the most memorable, and therefore this was the most effective way to convey information.

    For Cashin, storytelling is only partly about facts: A series of Post-it notes on the wall, each with a separate fact about something going on in the market that day, is not a story. It’s how you connect the facts and weave it into a narrative that make it a story.
    “I have been fortunate enough over the years to be able to look at very complicated situations or problems and be able to reduce them to understandable items by using a story or a parable,” he once said to me.
    He not only uses stories, but he also anthropomorphizes the entire market: He routinely described the market as being “in a tizzy,” or that traders were “circling the wagons” to defend a particularly important level of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
    Let’s get back to the story about J.P. Morgan, Tiffany and price discovery.
    For Cashin, understanding what a stock was worth was not about a mathematical formula. It was about trying to understand what the other guy was willing to pay:
    “How can I, in a real estate transaction, in a stock transaction, whatever, delve into your mind and find out what will you really accept? You offer your house at three quarters of a million dollars. Is that really your price? How do I find out what the difference was? And Morgan, in his natural genius, figured out that he would offer the guy somewhat less, and if the guy took it, that was to Morgan’s advantage. And if the guy refused, then that was the price and he had to pay.”
    Cashin’s secret sauce was a natural gift for telling stories with a “dramatic arc” — that is, stories with rising action, a climax, falling action and a resolution. Even the short Tiffany story contains all these elements: The action rises when Tiffany’s man presents the stickpin to Morgan with a $5,000 asking price, and Morgan counters with a $4,000 offer. The climax occurs when Tiffany declines the counteroffer. The falling action happens when he sends the courier back with the note. The resolution occurs when Tiffany opened the box and found not the stickpin but a check for $5,000 and a note that said, “Just checking the price.”
    Cashin grasped that these kinds of stories pack more emotional resonance than stories that don’t have the dramatic arc, and that’s why people remember them.

    What Art Cashin taught me

    When you’re a journalist, it’s easy to look at the news as a pile of facts on a bunch of sticky notes — but this isn’t what makes a story. It’s how you arrange those facts into a narrative that matters. A good narrative has emotional resonance.
    Art Cashin understood that intuitively. He helped show me that the sticky notes weren’t nearly enough.

    Finally, a story about Art Cashin

    Art Cashin told stories for 60 years, but there were also a lot of stories about him. He spent a lot of time in bars.
    Years ago, Cashin gave me a copy of a menu from Eberlin’s, a restaurant founded in 1872 and a fabled Wall Street hangout, long since departed. The menu was from the mid-1960s: a martini or Manhattan was $1.20.
    On the list of entrées, there is this:
    SPAGHETTI (a l’Arthur Cashin) …………………………………………… $2.75
    I asked him one night at Bobby Van’s, his preferred watering hole late in his career, why was a spaghetti dish named after him?
    “It was a hangover cure,” Cashin told me. “Eberlin’s opened at 6:00 a.m., and all the guys who had been out drinking the night before came in for something to eat. My preferred breakfast was spaghetti in a red sauce, so they named the dish after me.”
    How Cashin managed to spend decades on the NYSE floor and in bars — and still released his nightly Cashin’s Comments — is a mystery to me.
    I know one thing: He refused to give me the recipe for Spaghetti (a l’Arthur Cashin). I’m not even sure his family knows.
    Excerpted from the book, “Shut Up and Keep Talking: Lessons on Life and Investing from the Floor of the New York Stock Exchange,” by Bob Pisani (Harriman House, 2022). More

  • in

    Tech stocks hit first all-time high since July

    Yuichiro Chino | Moment | Getty Images

    Technology stocks powered to new highs on Wednesday as the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite rallied 1% and investors poured into key software and megacap players.
    The Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) advanced 1.8%, rallying for its fourth straight day since mid-October and knocking out its previous high touched in July.

    Stock chart icon

    XLK hits new high

    The rally came amid a bounce in key software players, with Salesforce popping more than 9% after reporting strong earnings after the bell Tuesday. Adobe climbed 4%, and ServiceNow jumped more than 5%. GoDaddy, Oracle and Palo Alto Networks gained about 3% each.
    Mainstay megacap technology stocks also rallied, with Apple inching higher by 0.2% to a new record. Nvidia outperformed among the Magnificent Seven names, jumping more than 3%, while Amazon rose more than 2%. Alphabet and Microsoft rose at least 1% each. Meta Platforms, on the other hand, was flat.
    Marvell Technology was another significant gainer, surging 23% on the heels of a solid quarter. Within the semiconductor space, Broadcom and Arm Holdings added more than 1% and 0.7%, respectively.
    Other technology funds notching new highs included the First Trust Cloud Computing ETF (SKYY) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). More

  • in

    AI play Pure Storage soars 24% after touting it won a contract with an unnamed big tech company

    Low-angle view of sign with logo on facade of technology company Pure Storage in the Silicon Valley town of Mountain View, California, October 28, 2018. 
    Smith Collection/gado | Getty Images

    Pure Storage shares rallied after announcing a contract with an unnamed “top four” AI hyperscaler in tandem with its fiscal third-quarter results.
    The shares were up 22%.

    The data storage management company topped Wall Street’s estimates and offered up strong fourth-quarter guidance. Pure Storage also upped its previously forecasted full-year outlook.
    “We’re very pleased,” CEO Charles Giancarlo told CNBC’s “Closing Bell: Overtime” on Tuesday. “This is the first time ever where a hyperscaler, for their standard customer-facing storage, is going to be using a system vendor … and what we’re providing them is a very cost effective, high performance solution that can replace 90% of their storage.”
    Pure Storage refrained from sharing the name of the contracted hyperscaler company, but Wall Street analysts regarded news as a big win contributing to the post-earnings pop. A hyperscaler refers to the major cloud computing companies with massive data center that can rapidly size up to meet shifting storage and demands. Some of the key players with major cloud units include Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet and Meta.
    Piper Sandler upgraded shares to an overweight rating following the results. Shares are already up about 50% this year as investors seek out alternative methods to playing artificial intelligence trends and companies search for new ways to manage AI’s data-heavy needs.
    Analyst James Fish said the contract creates a “pure opportunity ahead” and “removes the “coinflip risk” previously price into the stock. Agreements with additional hyperscalers represent and additional potential upside catalyst for the stock, he wrote, moving to a $76 price target.

    “Hyperscaler interest in flash creates a secular tailwind for the space, as these vendors have historically represented 60-70% of [hard disk drive] shipments,” wrote James Fish. “AI throws ‘gas on the fire’ for utilizing” its storage operating system.
    Fish isn’t alone in his bullish take on the stock. Wedbush Securities analyst Matt Bryson called the news a “margin accretive” win for the company and upped his price target to $75.
    “We see no reason to shift our constructive view on PSTG, given the promising incremental revenue opportunity and our continued belief that PSTG offers a superior enterprise storage solution,” he wrote. More

  • in

    You could score a tax break by gifting crypto to charity — but there may be some pitfalls

    FA Playbook

    In 2024, there’s been a significant jump in crypto gifts to non-profit organizations, according to Fidelity Charitable, which has accepted $688 million in crypto donations as of Nov. 19.
    To claim a tax break for donating digital assets, you must itemize tax breaks rather than take the standard deduction.
    Plus, not all charities will accept crypto and higher-value gifts may need a “qualified appraisal,” according to the IRS.

    Hispanolistic | E+ | Getty Images

    If you’re planning a gift to charity this holiday season, you could score a tax break by donating cryptocurrency. But there are some key things to know before making the transfer, experts say.
    In 2024, there’s been a significant jump in crypto gifts to charity, according to Fidelity Charitable, which has accepted $688 million in crypto donations — mostly in bitcoin — through Nov. 19. By comparison, the public charity received $49 million in digital currency in all of 2023.

    Donating crypto to charity is similar to giving other types of property. But “there are some pitfalls,” said certified financial planner Juan Ros, a partner at Forum Financial Management in Thousand Oaks, California. 

    More from FA Playbook:

    Here’s a look at other stories impacting the financial advisor business.

    Donate ‘the most highly appreciated asset’

    Since 2018, the higher standard deduction has made it harder to claim itemized tax breaks for charitable gifts, medical expenses, state and local taxes, among others. 
    But if you itemize and can claim the charitable deduction, it’s generally better to donate profitable investments, such as cryptocurrency, rather than cash.
    By donating crypto to charity, you can bypass capital gains taxes and claim a deduction based on its fair market value, assuming you’ve owned it for more than one year. The tax break has a cap of 30% of your adjusted gross income for public charities.

    Loading chart…

    It’s an attractive strategy for crypto investors because bitcoin and other coins could be “the most highly appreciated asset in their portfolio,” said Kyle Casserino, vice president and charitable planning consultant for Fidelity Charitable.

    The price of bitcoin was around $96,000 on Dec. 4, up by nearly 120% year-to-date, according to Coin Metrics.
    However, donating crypto can be more complicated than assets like stock, experts say.

    Some charities don’t accept crypto

    “Not every charity is willing or able to accept gifts of crypto,” so you’ll need to contact the organization first, Ros said.   
    As of January, 56% of the biggest U.S. charities accepted cryptocurrency donations, according to The Giving Block, a platform for digital currency gifts and fundraising. That’s up from 49% the previous year.  
    However, most large donor-advised funds are “well-equipped” to accept digital currency, Ros said.
    Donor-advised funds are investment accounts that work like a charitable checkbook. The donor receives an upfront deduction and can transfer funds to eligible nonprofit organizations later. 
    Typically, the donor-advised fund sells the crypto and reinvests the proceeds. But some allow investors to continue holding digital assets in the fund.

    You may need a ‘qualified appraisal’

    When you give a profitable investment owned for more than one year, your deduction is based on the fair market value of the asset.
    That’s easy for publicly traded stock, but the IRS requires added documentation for digital assets worth more than $5,000, according to Andrew Gordon, a tax attorney, certified public accountant and president of Gordon Law Group.
    “You’ve got to be able to support that deduction through the qualified appraisal,” which has specific IRS requirements, he said.
    For example, you must file Form 8283 with your tax return and keep a copy of the appraisal. But if the donated assets exceed $500,000, you must include the appraisal with your return, according to the IRS.
    You need to follow the IRS appraisal criteria “to the letter,” Ros explained. Otherwise, you could put your charitable deduction at risk in the event of an audit. More

  • in

    Student loan borrowers may find bankruptcy harder under Trump

    The Biden administration’s more lenient policy toward student loan borrowers in bankruptcy court may come to an end with the election of Donald Trump.
    “I suspect we’ll see a tightening in the approach of the relief,” said Malissa Giles, a consumer bankruptcy attorney in Virginia.

    Damircudic | E+ | Getty Images

    More federal student loan borrowers have been able to get their debt discharged in bankruptcy over the last few years, thanks to new guidance that the Biden administration has issued.
    That more lenient policy may be at risk when President-elect Donald Trump enters the White House in January, experts say.

    Here’s what borrowers need to know.

    ‘A tightening in the approach of relief’

    When the Trump administration takes over, “I suspect we’ll see a tightening in the approach of the relief,” said Malissa Giles, a consumer bankruptcy attorney in Virginia.
    As a result, Giles said she plans to be “a little more conservative” with the clients she recommends pursue bankruptcy for their student debt.
    “We’re probably not filing those cases that are a bigger ask right now,” Giles said. “I don’t want people to spend their money on it, when it may not come through.”
    More from Personal Finance:Here are the last days to ship a holiday packageWhy those traveling to Europe may find bargains in 2025Applying this ‘$1 rule’ is secret to guilt-free shopping

    Higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz also expects to see a reversal in the approach.
    “The Trump Administration is likely to rescind this guidance,” Kantrowitz said, referring to the Biden administration’s looser rules for student loan borrowers in bankruptcy.
    Latife Neu, a bankruptcy lawyer in Seattle, said she wasn’t sure bankruptcy would necessarily become more difficult for student loan borrowers under Trump.
    “There is a surprising amount of consensus across the political spectrum,” Neu said, that the higher bar for student loan borrowers to get their debt discharged in bankruptcy is “a defective policy.”
    The Trump transition team did not immediately respond to a CNBC’s request for comment .

    How bankruptcy got easier for student loan borrowers

    In the fall of 2022, the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Justice released updated bankruptcy guidelines to make it easier for struggling borrowers to get their student loans erased in court.
    Previously, it was difficult, if not impossible, for people to part with their education debt in a normal bankruptcy proceeding.
    In the 1970s, lawmakers added a stipulation that student loan borrowers needed to wait at least five years after they began repayment to file for bankruptcy. Policymakers and pundits had raised concerns that students would rack up a bunch of debt and then try to get rid of it after graduation.
    The waiting period was upped to seven years in 1990. The rules changed yet again almost a decade later, so that only people who proved that their student debt posed an “undue hardship” could discharge it.

    Congress, however, never spelled out what that term means, and lawyers and advocates say the uncertainty led to unfairness in the courts.
    The Biden administration’s recent approach treats student loans more like other types of debt in bankruptcy court, experts say. Borrowers are able to fill out a 15-page form, detailing their financial struggles and making their case for a mulligan.
    In the first 10 months of the new policy, student loan borrowers filed more than 630 bankruptcy cases, a “significant increase” from recent years, the Biden administration said in a statement at the time.
    “The vast majority of borrowers seeking discharge have received full or partial discharges,” it said.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    ‘Dynamic pricing’ was a top contender for word of the year. Here’s why it got consumers so worked up in 2024

    “Dynamic pricing” made Oxford University Press’ shortlist for the word of the year in 2024.
    Although the practice has been around for years, a recent surge in demand for sought-after concert tickets, such as Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour, brought dynamic pricing back into the spotlight.
    Ticketmaster is under investigation in the U.K. for its recent use of dynamic pricing in sales of next year’s reunion concerts from Britpop band Oasis.

    9parusnikov | Istock | Getty Images

    Oxford University Press may have crowned “brain rot” the word of the year, but “dynamic pricing” was also a top contender.
    Originally coined by economists in the late 1920s, dynamic pricing refers to “the practice of varying the price for a product or service to reflect changing market conditions. In particular, the charging of a higher price at a time of greater demand,” the publishing house said on its site.

    Many people associate it with shifting airline ticket prices or how ride-hailing service Uber adjusts fares at busy times. However, there was heightened awareness — and controversy — around the practice in 2024, especially when it came to buying highly sought-after event tickets.
    More from Personal Finance:’I cry a lot but I am so productive, it’s an art’Recession pop: How music hits on economic trends’I’m looking for a man in finance’
    “In some high-profile cases, dynamic pricing was used in setting prices for concert tickets, resulting in fans [often reluctantly] paying very high prices to see their favourite artists. In some cases, fans were in a virtual queue for hours before realizing how much they would be asked to pay, leading to questions about the transparency of dynamic pricing practices, as well as value for money,” Oxford said.

    How and when artists use dynamic pricing

    Ticketmaster is under investigation in the U.K. for its recent use of dynamic pricing in sales of next year’s reunion concerts from Britpop band Oasis.
    Many Oasis fans took to social media to complain that they ended up paying more than double the face value of the ticket without warning. The band said it would abandon the practice for the North American leg of its tour.

    Taylor Swift performs at Scottish Gas Murrayfield Stadium on June 07, 2024 in Edinburgh, Scotland. Swift’s Eras World Tour plays 15 dates across Scotland, Wales and England in June and August.
    Gareth Cattermole/tas24 | Getty Images Entertainment | Getty Images

    Taylor Swift reportedly refused to dynamically price her Eras Tour tickets because “she didn’t want to do that to her fans,” Jay Marciano, chairman and CEO of AEG Presents, which promoted the event, told HITS Daily Double in October.
    Also in an interview this fall, Robert Smith, the lead vocalist and guitarist for the Cure, said dynamic pricing is “driven by greed,” calling the practice a “scam.”
    How and when dynamic pricing is used is at the discretion of the artist or management, according to Andrew Mall, an associate professor of music at Northeastern University — and it was often determined under the radar.
    However, with so many recent high-profile tours, “for sure, dynamic pricing has surged to the forefront of concert goers’ attention,” he said.

    ‘A capitalist inevitability’

    “We all know that if you are looking for an Uber or Lyft, there are certain times of night when it’s more expensive. The market seems to have adapted to that,” said Joe Bennett, a forensic musicologist at Berklee College of Music. “But concert tickets were generally a fixed price.”
    Slowly, however, a change was taking hold.
    Throughout the 21st century, revenue from recorded music has gone down while revenue from live music events has gone up. By the mid-2000s, concerts “provided a larger source of income for performers than record sales or publishing royalties,” economist Alan Krueger wrote in a paper on the economic issues and trends in the rock and roll industry. Live music industry revenue jumped 25% in 2023 alone, according to data from Statista.

    In 2011, Ticketmaster first introduced an early version of dynamic ticket pricing, which is now the standard for live music ticketing sales. In more recent years, “ticket sales went crazy” driven by post-pandemic pent-up demand and a surge in mega-star stadium tours, Bennett said.
    “You can see why it’s tempting,” he said. “The live music industry is constantly leaving money on the table that fans would pay. Dynamic pricing is sort of a capitalist inevitability given the forces at play, but I don’t want to live in a world where it costs a $1,000 for my daughter to see Taylor Swift.”
    Still, it’s now common for ticket-selling platforms to charge more per ticket depending on demand for the event at any given time — whether consumers like it or not.
    “It’s not very popular, as you might imagine,” said Matt Schulz, LendingTree’s chief credit analyst. “Businesses and musicians are trying to see what the market will bear, and it makes things really difficult for the consumer.”

    Chalk it up to ‘funflation’

    Despite complaints, consumers prove that they have a high tolerance for the increasing price tags of live events, also known as “funflation.” Younger adults, particularly Generation Z and millennials, have demonstrated they would even go into debt to pursue some of these experiences, recent reports show.
    Nearly two out of five Gen Z and millennial travelers have spent up to $5,000 on tickets alone for destination live events, one recent study from Bread Financial found.
    “Knowing your limits is important,” Schulz said. “As much as you might love your favorite musician, there should be a limit to how much debt you are willing to go into for them.”

    Why dynamic pricing won’t go away

    “Consumers don’t like the idea of dynamic pricing, but there is a renewed ‘YOLO’ [you only live once] attitude over the past few years since the pandemic and, increasingly, that drives a devil-may-care approach when it comes to spending on discretionary experiences,” said Greg McBride, chief financial analyst at Bankrate.com.
    Even with household budgets strained, “you get to a point where there are just some experiences where consumers draw the line and say, that’s not something I’m willing to give up,” he said.

    Ticket sellers are well aware of this mentality, too.
    “Our research consistently tells us that concerts are a top priority for discretionary spending, and one of the last experiences fans will cut back on,” Live Nation said in a quarterly earnings call in 2023. 
    But as consumers continue to spare no expense to see their favorite artist or group, that means that means dynamic pricing is here to stay, at least for now.
    “The live music sector has been leaning into this attitude for a long time,” Northeastern University’s Mall said.
    Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube. More

  • in

    Investors’ crypto donations to charity skyrocket. Why it can be ‘hugely beneficial,’ expert says

    FA Playbook

    There’s soaring interest in donating cryptocurrency to charity as digital currency investors seek to maximize their tax break and impact.
    For 2024, Fidelity Charitable has received $688 million in crypto donations through Nov. 19. That’s up from $49 million in all of 2023.
    If you itemize deductions, it’s typically better to donate profitable assets like crypto or stock, rather than cash, experts say.

    Artistgndphotography | E+ | Getty Images

    There’s soaring interest in donating cryptocurrency to charity as digital currency investors seek to maximize their tax break and impact.
    “A lot of folks have begun to realize that crypto giving is hugely beneficial,” said Kyle Casserino, vice president and charitable planning consultant for Fidelity Charitable, a public charity that accepts bitcoin, ethereum and litecoin.

    Bitcoin donations have surged amid the latest rally as investors learn about the tax benefits, according to Casserino.   

    More from FA Playbook:

    Here’s a look at other stories impacting the financial advisor business.

    For 2024, Fidelity Charitable has accepted $688 million in crypto donations through Nov. 19. That’s up from $49 million in all of 2023 and $38 million in 2022, according to the organization’s 2024 giving report.
    For some perspective, as of Dec. 31, 2023, Fidelity Charitable had received more than $565 million in cumulative gifts since the charity started accepting the assets in 2015.
    “Most of our volume, in terms of numbers and dollars, is all in bitcoin,” Casserino said.
    DAFgiving360, formerly Schwab Charitable, doesn’t release numbers for crypto donations. But the organization reported that it received 63% of contributions in non-cash assets, such as crypto and stocks, for fiscal year 2024.

    Some 56% of the top 100 U.S. charities accepted crypto donations as of Jan. 2024, according to The Giving Block, a platform for digital currency gifts and fundraising.

    Loading chart…

    Donating profitable crypto is a ‘good strategy’

    Most taxpayers use the standard deduction on their returns, which doesn’t allow itemized tax breaks, such as charitable gifts.
    But if you itemize and can claim the charitable deduction, it’s generally better to donate profitable assets, like cryptocurrency or stocks, rather than cash, according to Andrew Gordon, a tax attorney, certified public accountant and president of Gordon Law Group.

    By gifting appreciated investments, you can avoid triggering capital gains taxes, which saves the donor and charity money. Generally, you can deduct the asset’s fair market value if you’ve owned it for more than one year. The cap on the tax break is 30% of your adjusted gross income for public charities.
    “It’s a good strategy, especially with crypto and bitcoin at all-time highs,” Gordon said. “It’s something that we’re going to be suggesting more to people.”The price of bitcoin was hovering around $95,000 early on Dec. 4, up by nearly 120% year-to-date, according to Coin Metrics. Bitcoin investors saw a post-election rally fueled by President-elect Donald Trump, who promised pro-crypto policy during his campaign. More