More stories

  • in

    IRS extends Free File tax program through 2029

    The IRS has extended the Free File program through 2029, continuing its partnership with a coalition of private tax software companies.
    IRS Free File remains open for 2023 returns through the Oct. 15 federal tax extension deadline.
    Meanwhile, the IRS is weighing future plans for Direct File, a free filing pilot directly with the agency.

    D3sign | Moment | Getty Images

    The IRS has extended the Free File program through 2029, continuing its partnership with a coalition of private tax software companies that allow most Americans to file federal taxes for free.
    This season, Free File processed 2.9 million returns through May 11, a 7.3% increase compared to the same period last year, according to the IRS.

    “Free File has been an important partner with the IRS for more than two decades and helped tens of millions of taxpayers,” Ken Corbin, chief of IRS taxpayer services, said in a statement Wednesday. “This extension will continue that relationship into the future.”
    More from Personal Finance:IRS free tax filing pilot processed 140,000 returns, saved $5.6 million in feesBiden, Trump rematch: How the presidential election may disrupt the stock marketThe decision to sell your home vs. rent it out is ‘complicated,’ experts say
    “This multi-year agreement will also provide certainty for private-sector partners to help with their future Free File planning,” Corbin added.
    IRS Free File remains open through the Oct. 15 federal tax extension deadline.
    You can use Free File for 2023 returns with an adjusted gross income of $79,000 or less, which is up from $73,000 in 2022. Fillable Forms are also still available for all income levels.  

    The future of IRS Direct File

    The news comes roughly one month after the agency unveiled numbers for its Direct File pilot program, which provided a free filing option directly with the IRS for certain taxpayers in 12 states.
    More than 140,000 taxpayers successfully filed returns using IRS Direct File this tax season, and the program saved filers an estimated $5.6 million in tax preparation fees for federal returns.
    The agency expects to decide on the future of Direct File later this spring after input from a “wide variety of stakeholders,” IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel told reporters on a press call in April.

    Don’t miss these exclusives from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Here’s how higher state taxes on the wealthy could affect interstate migration trends

    YOUR GUIDE TO NAVIGATING YOUR FINANCIAL FUTURE

    There’s a growing debate over how higher taxes on the wealthy affect interstate migration trends, and some experts say millionaire tax flight is underway.
    “Taxes are an important part of this puzzle,” said Jared Walczak, vice president of state projects for the Tax Foundation, speaking at CNBC’s Financial Advisor Summit on Wednesday.

    Sean De Burca | The Image Bank | Getty Images

    There’s a growing debate over how higher taxes on the wealthy affect interstate migration trends — and some experts say millionaire tax flight is underway.
    “Taxes are an important part of this puzzle,” said Jared Walczak, vice president of state projects for the Tax Foundation, speaking at CNBC’s Financial Advisor Summit on Wednesday.

    “There’s more movement among the highest-income and highest-net-worth individuals than there is among the lowest,” Walczak said. He said studies show there’s an out-migration when states make these changes.

    More from Your Money:

    Here’s a look at more stories on how to manage, grow and protect your money for the years ahead.

    “Tax policy is having an impact,” said Bess Freedman, CEO of Brown Harris Stevens Residential Sales, who also spoke on CNBC’s panel. But it’s not “earth-shaking” or the “end of the world for New York,” a city that still has more than 350,000 millionaires, she said. 
    “People still want to be a part of New York and are willing to invest,” she added.
    Other research suggests state taxes may have a minimal impact on migration trends, according to Michael Mazerov, senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
    Top earners are more likely to leave certain high-tax states, but there’s no evidence to suggest a “mass exodus” from places like New York, said Mazerov, who released a report on this topic in August 2023.

    Tax changes on the horizon

    TCJA also added a temporary $10,000 cap on the deduction for state and local taxes, known as SALT, which has been a key issue in high-tax states such as California, New Jersey and New York. The limit was designed to raise tax revenue for other TCJA provisions.
    Walczak said the $10,000 SALT deduction limit has contributed to migration. “It’s worth a couple of percentage points in a state like New York,” he said.
    However, with control of the White House and Congress pending, it’s difficult to predict whether the SALT cap will lift after 2025, especially amid the federal budget deficit. More

  • in

    Biden, Trump rematch: Here’s how the presidential election may disrupt the stock market

    FA Playbook

    Speaking at CNBC’s Financial Advisor Summit, politics experts covered what investors should know about the stock market during the 2024 presidential election.
    “Given this is going down in history as probably the most consequential and contentious election in the U.S. in 100 years, it’s kind of difficult to believe that the market is trading with the election in mind,” said David Woo, CEO of research firm Unbound.
    Historically, potential election outcomes have a minimal impact on financial market performance in the medium and long term, according to a U.S. Bank Wealth Management analysis.

    Joe Biden and Donald Trump 2024.
    Brendan Smialowski | Jon Cherry | Getty Images

    The stock market has yet to price in a potential outcome in the presidential election, a rematch between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump.
    In general, election years are not great for the stock market leading up to voting day, David Woo, CEO of research firm Unbound, said Wednesday in a session during CNBC’s Financial Advisor Summit.

    But this year is an exception, Woo explained.
    “This year we’re up 12% so far. This is the best-performing year for the S&P 500 [in] an election year since [the] 1980 election,” Woo said.
    Looking back to 1928, the S&P 500 returned an average 7.5% in presidential election years, versus an average 8% in non-election years, according to a March analysis from J.P. Morgan Private Bank.
    “Given this is going down in history as probably the most consequential and contentious election in the U.S. in 100 years, it’s kind of difficult to believe that the market is trading with the election in mind,” Woo said.

    What Biden, Trump could mean for the stock market

    While domestic issues are usually determinative in presidential elections, the coming race will likely be focused on international issues, said Woo.

    Both candidates will enter office with a budget deficit of $1 trillion, meaning “whoever is going to be the next president is going to be facing a real serious constraint,” said Woo. “When it comes to fiscal policy, frankly speaking, I don’t think there will be a huge difference.”

    More from FA Playbook:

    Here’s a look at other stories impacting the financial advisor business.

    Instead, the differentiator will depend on the candidate’s stance on foreign policy, he said.
    Defense spending might increase under a Biden administration, signaling a potential boost for defense stocks, Woo said.
    Meanwhile, emerging markets “may be more bullish” under a Trump administration, he said.
    “I think Trump is going to come back with a more transactional approach in dealing with American adversaries,” said Woo, who believes the Republican candidate us going to revisit the Phase 1 Trade agreement between China and Russia as the “starting point” of any negotiation deal between the U.S. and China.
    Elsewhere, energy stocks might benefit under Biden more so than Trump.
    “Everybody thinks Donald Trump is going to be bullish for energy … that’s completely untrue,” Woo said.
    “It was actually not until Biden became president and energy stocks soared because geopolitical risks went through the roof,” he said.
    Meanwhile, all polls are pointing toward a Trump reelection, Steve Kornacki, National Political Correspondent at NBC News and MSNBC, said during the summit.
    “Donald Trump in the average is leading Biden by 1.1 points nationally,” he said, as Trump has made gains among Hispanic and African American voters, as well as younger, nonwhite voters.
    “That accounts for why Donald Trump is polling better now than he did four years ago,” he said.

    When the market gets volatile during elections

    Historically, potential election outcomes have a minimal impact on financial market performance in the medium and long term, according to an analysis by investment strategists at U.S. Bank Wealth Management. They studied market data from the past 75 years and identified patterns that repeated themselves during election cycles. 
    Yet delays in verifying an election winner have negatively affected riskier asset classes in prior races, according to the analysis.
    “The stock market does not like uncertainty whatsoever,” said Douglas A. Boneparth, a certified financial planner, president and founder of Bone Fide Wealth, a wealth management firm based in New York City.

    If things are delayed and there’s not a “clear-cut winner,” that uncertainty can lead to market volatility, he said. “But it’s very hard to predict what the market is going to do based on simply who’s going to get elected.” 
    Overall, the stock market has done well under both presidents, said Boneparth: “No one’s crying over how well the market has done in either administration.” 

    ‘You’re probably going to make a mistake’

    “As financial advisors, we don’t really make decisions around politics, let alone who’s going to be elected president,” said Boneparth, a member of the CNBC Financial Advisor Council.
    Therefore, it’s in your best interest to stick to your long-term strategy, said Boneparth.
    “If you’re making any changes specifically because of one candidate or the other, you’re probably going to make a mistake,” he said. “If you’re going to let this disrupt your long-term strategy, what else are you going to let disrupt your long-term strategy?”

    Don’t miss these exclusives from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    How financial advisors are factoring for emotions in money management

    FA Playbook

    Behavioral economics combines the study of economics and the study of psychology to understand how people make financial decisions.
    “The best investment is not necessarily the one that shows the highest long-term rate of return, it’s the investment that our clients can stick with,” said one certified financial planner.
    Financial advisors can use behavioral science to understand people’s emotions and help guide them to make better decisions, but it’s not therapy. 

    Skynesher | E+ | Getty Images

    New technologies have given people access to more information and new tools to manage their money.
    Robo-advisors can build and rebalance portfolios based on customer preferences. However, automation doesn’t factor in people’s emotional needs.

    Experts say adding behavioral science to investing knowledge can help financial advisors get better results for their clients. 

    Understanding behavioral science 

    Advisors are increasing their use of artificial intelligence tools for more rote tasks, such as research, scheduling and even stock picking.
    That change is one of the drivers that has more investment advisors focused on behavioral science to understand how and why people make the financial decisions they do. Behavioral economics combines the study of economics and the study of psychology to understand how people make financial decisions.
    “For too long as a profession, we have been taught that we should be ignoring emotions,” said certified financial planner Tim Mauer, chief advisory officer at SignatureFD, which has offices in Atlanta and Charlotte, North Carolina. “We better be more astute students of our clients’ behavior and emotion so we can better understand how to point that emotion in the right direction.”

    More from FA Playbook:

    Here’s a look at other stories impacting the financial advisor business.

    Instead of a quantitative approach to managing a mix of stocks, bonds and other assets, Mauer suggests a qualitative approach that uncovers the person’s purpose behind the portfolio.

    “We’re focusing our planning on the actual human felt needs that our clients have, rather than the tools and techniques that we might utilize in order to help them achieve their goals,” Maurer said Wednesday during a session at CNBC’s FA Summit.
    “The best investment is not necessarily the one that shows the highest long-term rate of return, it’s the investment that our clients can stick with,” said Maurer, who is also a member of the CNBC Financial Advisor Council.

    Connecting to the human

    Keeping emotions in check can help guide people through rocky financial markets and help them, as famed investor Warren Buffett once notably said, “Be fearful when others are greedy and to be greedy only when others are fearful.”
    While AI can help with finding different ways of explaining financial strategies, it can’t connect with people.
    “You can give great advice and people won’t take it. So the creative problem-solving comes in being vulnerable and being able to communicate that in a way that’s going to speak to them,” said Sam G. Huszczo, a CFP and founder of SGH Wealth Management near Detroit. “There’s no AI that’s doing that for you.” 

    Don’t confuse behavioral science with financial therapy

    Financial advisors can use behavioral science to understand people’s emotions and help guide them to make better decisions, but it’s not therapy. 
    “Financial therapy is looking at a situation that is intractable, where somebody cannot get past a particular financial behavior,” Maurer said. “And then they’re working with a therapist that has a specifically financial bent, to go back in time and determine what was it in my past that may have generated this particular behavior.”

    Financial therapy digs deeper into issues that may be keeping people from reaching their financial goals.
    “The financial therapist can peel back the layers so that folks can be more comfortable with their relationship with money and better understand why they’re making the decisions with money that they are and work towards their goals that way,” said Ashley Agnew, president of the Financial Therapy Association.
    For example, Agnew says she worked with a client who had in his financial plan to sell his family business to fund his retirement, but he kept derailing deals to make the sale. To understand why, in therapy sessions they dug deep into his feelings about the sale. He revealed that the business was the only thing his father had praised and they unpacked his feelings from there to help him move forward.   
    “It makes a little bit more sense once you get to that,” said Agnew, who is also a director at Centerpoint Advisors in Needham, Massachusetts.
    Financial therapists will often refer clients to licensed mental health counselors if the issues, such as abuse, get too far beyond the finances. More

  • in

    We’re in a ‘vibecession,’ experts say. Here’s how to invest accordingly

    FA Playbook

    The U.S. economy has remained remarkably strong and yet, not everyone is celebrating.
    There is a disconnect between how the nation, overall, is faring and how Americans feel about their own financial standing, said experts at CNBC’s Financial Advisor Summit.
    Here’s how to handle a “vibecession.”

    The U.S. economy has remained remarkably strong.
    Boosted by a strong labor market, the country has continued to expand since the Covid-19 pandemic, sidestepping earlier recessionary forecasts even after a series of Federal Reserve interest rate increases.

    And yet, consumer sentiment recently sank to a six-month low.
    That disconnect is what Joyce Chang, JPMorgan’s chair of global research, calls a “vibecession.”

    More from FA Playbook:

    Here’s a look at other stories impacting the financial advisor business.

    “If you’re a homeowner or if you own financial assets, you’ve done very well, but you’re leaving out huge segments of the population,” Chang explained in a session during the CNBC Financial Advisor Summit on Wednesday.
    “The wealth creation was concentrated amongst homeowners and upper-income brackets, but you probably have about one-third of the population that’s been left out of that — that’s why there’s such a disconnect,” Chang said.
    On the flip side, the combination of higher interest rates and inflation have hit working-class Americans particularly hard. 

    Many of these households have exhausted their savings and are now leaning on credit cards to make ends meet.
    Recent reports show credit card delinquency rates are rising — especially among young adults who are burdened by high levels of student loan debt and steep costs across the board.

    Perception vs. reality

    “Though the data on the economy continues to be really strong, the consumer is not feeling that and it’s really showing,” said Courtney Garcia, senior wealth advisor at Payne Capital Management.
    “Every client we’ve been talking to over the last several months has brought up the concern of, they’re worried about inflation, worried they can’t spend money,” Garcia said. “That’s regardless of whether the data is coming in good or bad,”
    Further, “that consumer sentiment is absolutely fitting into how they’re investing — that’s absolutely why you’re seeing so much cash on the sidelines,” Garcia added.

    Although younger generations are more likely to feel heightened nervousness about their financial standing, they also have the advantage of a longer time horizon, Garcia said. “We’re really making sure we’re talking to clients about the importance of looking long term.”
    Even in the face of potential headwinds, there are plenty of opportunities for investors in areas such as commodities and small-cap stocks, which underperformed large caps last year, she said.
    “Making sure you are broadly diversified is going to be key,” Garcia said. “Your large U.S. companies have done so well; a lot of people are actually overexposed there.”
    “It’s probably a good time to take some profits, if you haven’t already,” she said.
    Despite the bad vibes, “generally speaking, I’m more positive on the fact that the data is showing the economy — and the consumer — is still on good footing,” Garcia said.

    Don’t miss these exclusives from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Biden administration to forgive $7.7 billion in student debt for more than 160,000 borrowers

    The Biden administration said on Wednesday that it would forgive $7.7 billion in student debt for more than 160,000 borrowers, its latest effort to reduce the burden of education debt on households.
    The relief is a result of the U.S. Department of Education’s improvements to its income-driven repayment plans and Public Service Loan Forgiveness program.

    U.S. President Joe Biden delivers remarks regarding student loan debt forgiveness in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on Wednesday August 24, 2022.
    Demetrius Freeman | The Washington Post | Getty Images

    The Biden administration said on Wednesday that it would forgive $7.7 billion in student loans for more than 160,000 borrowers, its latest effort to reduce the burden of education debt on households.
    The relief is a result of the U.S. Department of Education’s improvements to its income-driven repayment plans and Public Service Loan Forgiveness program.

    “The Biden-Harris Administration remains persistent about our efforts to bring student debt relief to millions more across the country,” said Education Secretary Miguel Cardona in a statement.
    Wednesday’s loan forgiveness includes $5.2 billion for 66,900 borrowers pursuing Public Service Loan Forgiveness, and $1.9 billion for 39,200 people enrolled in income-driven repayment plans.
    Another $613 million will go to 54,300 borrowers under the Biden administration’s new income-driven repayment option, known as the Saving on a Valuable Education, or SAVE, plan. That option leads to student loan forgiveness after 10 years for those who originally borrowed $12,000 or less.

    Forgiveness total reaches $167 billion

    After the Supreme Court struck down President Joe Biden’s sweeping student debt cancellation plan last summer, the White House has been exploring its existing authority to reduce borrowers’ balances. One area it has found fruitful: the Education Department’s already established but hard to access loan forgiveness options.

    Including Wednesday’s round of relief, the Biden administration has so far excused the debt of 4.75 million borrowers, totaling $167 billion in aid. Much of that total comes from expanding the reach of and making fixes to these programs.

    Historically, borrowers found these aid options were hard if not impossible to navigate, and many complained they weren’t receiving the relief to which they were entitled, consumer advocates say.
    For example, income-driven repayment plans lead to loan erasure after a certain period, but the Education Department often didn’t have a proper accounting of borrowers’ timeline, reports found. The department said in 2022 it would review these accounts.
    Have you recently gotten your student debt forgiven? If you’re willing to share your experience for an upcoming story, please email me at: Annie.nova@nbcuni.com

    Don’t miss these exclusives from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Wealth inequality starts at birth. Lawmakers debate whether child savings accounts can help

    A new Congressional proposal, the 401Kids Savings Act, would create savings accounts for children starting from birth.
    As states implement similar programs, Congressional lawmakers are divided as to whether a national program makes sense.

    Urbazon | E+ | Getty Images

    An unequal distribution of wealth in the U.S. can make it so some children are behind from birth.
    Now lawmakers are considering whether federal children’s savings accounts can help.

    One proposal — the 401Kids Savings Act — would create savings accounts for all newborns. Low- and moderate- income families would receive federal contributions if their modified adjusted gross incomes falls under certain thresholds. Children in households that qualify for the earned income tax credit would receive additional aid. All families would be eligible to contribute up to $2,500 per year.
    By the time some children turn 18 — particularly a qualifying low-income newborn born to a single parent — up to $53,000 may be accumulated for their benefit, according to the proposal.
    Children’s savings accounts are currently available statewide in seven states — California, Illinois, Maine, Nebraska, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island.
    At the end of last year, there were 121 children’s savings account programs in 39 states serving 5.8 million children.
    More from Personal Finance:As Social Security’s funds face insolvency, here’s what to watchWhy most of Warren Buffett’s wealth came after age 65Advice about 401(k) rollovers is poised for a big change. Here’s why

    The programs are aimed at helping to reduce unequal wealth distribution among American child households, which research shows is prevalent among Black and Hispanic households as compared to white households.
    “All the evidence from existing programs shows that money not only unlocks opportunities for kids, it’s a smart investment that goes right back into the economy down the road,” Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, and chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said at a Tuesday hearing.
    However, implementing a federal program may come with significant costs to taxpayers, said Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, who is the ranking member on the committee.
    “Expanding options to save is a worthy goal, but we must do so in a way that does not exacerbate already out-of-control government spending, or create another unsustainable government program,” Crapo said.

    State child savings accounts show promise

    Even without federal funding, children’s savings accounts have shown the ability to help families build wealth, William Elliott, a professor of social work at the University of Michigan, testified on Tuesday.
    Existing programs provide small initial deposits ranging from $5 to $1,000, he said.
    In the SEED for Oklahoma Kids experiment, which deposited $1,000 on behalf randomly selected newborn participants including low-income and Black families, the average child now has about $4,373 in their account at age 14.
    “Even when family savings are minimal, significant assets accumulate in these types of accounts,” Elliott said.
    The money doesn’t just help improve financial preparedness for college, he said. It has also been shown to help children’s early social emotional development, math and reading scores and increase the likelihood they will eventually enroll in college.

    In Maine, the Alfond Scholarship Foundation has provided all babies born in the state with a $500 grant towards either college or future training.
    To date, the foundation has invested about $78 million on behalf of 156,000 children, according to Colleen Quint, president and CEO of the Alfond Scholarship Foundation.
    Families have contributed about three times that amount, or about $236 million, she said. They have also received about $29 million in matching grants from the state.
    The total invested — about $344 million — grew to $477 million in the market as of the end of April, according to Quint.
    Early data shows the $500 investment families receive has an outsized impact on their aspirations, savings behaviors and engagement around education, she said.
    A federal program would help give residents of all states the same opportunity.
    “We don’t have to imagine what a national platform would look like,” Quint said. “We can see it happening now.”

    Concerns about inflation, tax implications

    Critics of the children’s savings plans point out the government already deployed massive amounts of stimulus money during the pandemic, which hasn’t meaningfully boosted long-term savings.
    “Savings rates are again near historic lows,” Adam Michel, director of tax policy studies at the Cato Institute, said at the hearing.
    “In this case, checks from the government fueled more inflation than they did wealth building,” he said.

    Other approaches may better help to address wealth inequities for young children.
    Reforming the tax code can help prevent double taxation on wages when they are earned, as well as interest that accumulates on saving, Michel said. While that disincentive has been reduced for 401(k)s and 529 plans, they still come with restrictions on how the money may be used that may discourage low- and middle-income individuals from using them.
    The 401Kids proposal calls for children to only have access to the funds once they turn 18. The money would have to be used for education, training, a home purchase or to start a business. The funds could also be rolled over to a Roth individual retirement account or ABLE account for children with disabilities.
    Universal savings accounts, which may allow for more flexibility in uses for the money, may be a better solution, some experts said.
    “Universal savings account have a benefit that they do not discourage savings for those who are concerned that the conditions for withdrawal … would stop them from addressing an emergency in their family,” said Veronique de Rugy, senior research fellow at The Mercatus Center. More

  • in

    Some millennials, Gen Zers plan to tap into retirement savings to buy a home. They ‘really shouldn’t,’ advisor says

    Nearly one-third of aspiring homebuyers plan to pull money from their 401(k) plan to help cover the cost, according to the Real Financial Progress Index by BMO Financial Group.
    Millennials and Gen Zers are more likely than older workers to say they will pull from retirement accounts to buy a home.
    While a 401(k) loan might be a better option, doing so entails its own set of risks, experts say.

    Some young retirement savers say they might raid their 401(k) accounts to buy a home. Doing so, however, could be to their detriment, experts warn.
    Nearly one-third (30%) of aspiring homeowners say they plan to withdraw funds from their 401(k) plan to fund a purchase, according to the Real Financial Progress Index by BMO Financial Group. BMO polled 2,505 U.S. adults this spring.

    Millennials and Generation Z are more likely than older generations to say they will pull out money from their 401(k), BMO found, at 31% and 34%, respectively. To compare, only 25% of Generation X homebuyers and 16% of baby boomers plan to withdraw retirement funds for a home purchase.
    “You really, really, really, really shouldn’t be taking out your retirement for a house,” said Stacy Francis, a certified financial planner and president and CEO of Francis Financial in New York City.
    More from Personal Finance:Doing this could lead borrowers to miss out on forgivenessA 20% home down payment isn’t ‘the law of the land’Is it time to rethink the 4% retirement withdrawal rule?
    Generally, early withdrawals from retirement accounts can trigger taxes and a 10% penalty, unless the account owner meets a listed exception. For both individual retirement accounts and 401(k)s, qualifying first-time homebuyers may be able to take up to $10,000 penalty-free. With Roth IRAs, owners can withdraw their post-tax contributions at any time without penalty.
    Still, “it’s much better to have those dollars working for you,” said Francis, a member of the CNBC Financial Advisor Council.

    While a 401(k) loan might be a better option to meet necessary payments for a home purchase, doing so entails its own set of financial risks, experts say.

    ‘Significant financial consequences’ for withdrawals

    More savers tapped into their retirement savings last year, which experts say shows that some households were facing financial distress. In 2023, 3.6% of savers took out hardship withdrawals, up from 2.8% in 2022, according to Vanguard’s How America Saves 2024 preview.
    But making withdrawals from your 401(k) plan can have “significant financial consequences,” said Tom Parrish, head of lending at BMO. Not only will you be denting your funds set aside for retirement, early withdrawals can also often subject you to associated penalty fees and taxes, he said.

    “There’s a reason there’s limitations to these accounts. They’re in your favor,” said Clifford Cornell, a certified financial planner and an associate financial advisor at Bone Fide Wealth in New York.
    For example, a 30-year-old worker who left $10,000 in their 401(k) instead of withdrawing it could end up with nearly $77,000 more for retirement at age 65, assuming average annual returns of 6%.

    The pros and cons of 401(k) loans

    While experts say taking out a loan against your 401(k) is generally a bad idea, it can be a more palatable option for the down payment or part of closing costs of a home, versus a withdrawal.
    Federal law allows workers to borrow up to 50% of their 401(k) account balance or $50,000, whichever is less, without penalty as long as the loan is repaid within five years.
    “The key thing is to ensure that you pay that back over that period of time,” Parrish said.
    However, if you leave your company — whether you’re laid off or find a new job — most employers will require your outstanding balance be repaid more quickly.

    Another risk is that you overstretch on your home budget. Purchasing a home entails long-term, real commitments, said Francis. Not only are buyers responsible for down payment, moving and closing costs, they then also have ongoing payments for the mortgage, real estate taxes and maintenance costs to consider.
    “It’s going to be a very expensive thing for you to do,” she said. If “any little domino falls the wrong way,” you might not be able to pay neither the 401(k) loan nor the mortgage, putting yourself in a “real deep financial hole,” Francis said.

    Don’t miss these exclusives from CNBC PRO More