More stories

  • in

    Here’s what investors should consider now that Series I bonds are paying 5.27%

    Series I bonds are now paying 5.27% annual interest through April 2024, up from the 4.3% yearly rate offered since May.
    While the new rate is down significantly from the record 9.62% in May 2022, investors can now lock in a fixed rate of 1.3%, which may appeal to long-term investors.
    However, short-term investors should compare I bonds to options like certificates of deposit, high-yield savings accounts, Treasury bills and money market funds, experts say.

    Eric Audras | PhotoAlto Agency RF Collections | Getty Images

    Series I bonds are now paying 5.27% annual interest through April 2024, up from the 4.3% yearly rate offered since May — and experts have tips for short- and long-term investors.
    While the new rate is down significantly from the record 9.62% offered in May 2022, investors can now lock in a fixed rate of 1.3%, up from 0.9%, for I bonds purchased from May 1 through Oct. 31.

    The new fixed rate is the highest since 2007.
    If you’re a long-term investor, “it’s definitely a good time to build up some I bonds,” said Ken Tumin, founder and editor of DepositAccounts.com, which tracks I bonds, among other assets.
    More from Personal Finance:New Series I bond rate is 5.27% for the next six months’Dupe shopping’ has ‘flipped the script’ for consumersWhy working longer is a bad retirement plan
    There are two parts to I bond yields — a variable and fixed rate portion — which the U.S. Department of the Treasury adjusts every May and November.
    While the variable rate changes every six months based on inflation, the Treasury may also adjust the fixed rate or keep it the same. The fixed rate stays the same after purchase and the variable rate resets every six months starting on your original purchase date. (There’s a historic breakdown of both rates here.)

    “The 1.3 percent fixed rate is what you should be focused on,” said certified financial planner Jeremy Keil at Keil Financial Partners in New Berlin, Wisconsin. “It’s the best fixed rate in 15-plus years.”
    Experts say the new 1.3% fixed rate makes I bonds an attractive option for long-term investors looking for an inflation-protected place for cash.

    The 1.30% fixed rate is what you should be focused on. It’s the best fixed rate in 15-plus years.

    Jeremy Keil
    Financial advisor at Keil Financial Partners

    “After five years, you can redeem [I bonds] without worrying about a penalty,” Tumin said. “At that point, it can become a very good emergency fund.”
    You can buy I bonds online through TreasuryDirect. There’s a $10,000 per calendar year limit for individuals, but also a few ways to bypass it. You can, also purchase an extra $5,000 in paper I bonds with your federal tax refund.

    Better options for short-term cash

    While I bonds may appeal to long-term investors, experts say there are better options for short-term cash.
    One of the downsides of I bonds is you can’t access the money for at least one year. You’ll also trigger a three-month interest penalty by redeeming I bonds within five years, which cuts into your overall return.

    If you need the money in a year, “you’re probably better off with a top online certificate of deposit,” said Tumin. The top 1% average for one-year CDs is nearly 5.75%, as of Nov. 1, according to DepositAccounts.
    Of course, you can’t directly compare I bonds to a one-year CD because I bond rates change every six months, he said. 
    More flexible options may include high-yield online savings accounts, Treasury bills, or money market funds. However, those rates may eventually decline if the Federal Reserve starts cutting interest rates. More

  • in

    More than 1 million are waiting for Social Security to process initial disability claims. The consequences are ‘devastating,’ lawmaker says

    Applicants for Social Security disability benefits face long wait times amid a record backlog of applications.
    Experts and lawmakers say more can be done to expedite the process.

    Richard Stephen | Istock | Getty Images

    If you’ve applied for Social Security disability benefits and are still waiting for an answer, you’re not alone.
    “For the first time in history, more than 1 million people are waiting on the Social Security Administration to process their initial disability claim,” said Rep. Drew Ferguson, R-Ga., chair of the House Ways and Means Social Security subcommittee, at a hearing last week.

    It currently takes 220 days for claims to be decided, on average, which is more than 100 days longer than it did in 2019, Ferguson said. That is also more than 150 days longer than the Social Security Administration’s standard for minimum level of performance, he said.
    More from Personal Finance:Will Social Security be there for me when I retire?Medicare open enrollment may cut retiree’s health-care costsHow much your Social Security check may be in 2024
    “The real-world consequences for these individuals who are unable to work and wait for their disability decision is devastating,” Ferguson said.

    ‘He died from the conditions that he applied with’

    Experts who testified at the hearing said they have seen the effect of the growing wait times firsthand.
    One Social Security disability applicant finally had a hearing scheduled for this month but did not live until the scheduled date, according to David Camp, interim CEO at the National Organization of Social Security Claimants’ Representatives.

    That came after his claim for Social Security disability benefits had been denied initially and again at reconsideration, a process where initial decisions may be appealed.
    “He died from the conditions that he applied with, that went untreated,” Camp said.
    While the patient sought help with 825 days left to live, Social Security wasted more than 500 days with its delays.
    “He could not live long enough to outlast Social Security’s capacity to delay,” Camp said.

    Moreover, 90% of the reconsideration findings were identical to the initial conclusions, he noted.
    From 2010 to 2022, claims for Social Security disability benefits declined by 37%, while claims for Supplemental Security Income, or SSI, fell by 49%, according to Camp. Yet wait times have increased.
    “The problem is Social Security’s policies,” Camp said.
    Linda Kerr-Davis, acting assistant deputy commissioner of operations at the Social Security Administration, testified at the hearing and acknowledged that the average seven-month wait time for a decision is a problem.
    “This is simply not acceptable to you or to us,” Kerr-Davis said.

    The steps we have taken are just beginning to show positive results.

    Linda Kerr-Davis
    acting assistant deputy commissioner of operations at the Social Security Administration

    The agency has been taking steps to address the issue within the constraints of its budget, she said, by redirecting experienced personnel, hiring new full-time professionals and working on improvements to processes and policies.
    “The steps we have taken are just beginning to show positive results,” Kerr-Davis said.
    Experts and lawmakers who testified at the hearing raised more suggestions. These included:

    1. Eliminate the reconsideration process

    The Social Security disability application may involve an initial application followed by another step called reconsideration, if that first attempt to receive benefits is rejected.
    If an applicant does not agree with the decision made during reconsideration, they may then meet with an administrative law judge.
    Meeting with a judge is often a more thorough process and typically results in more approvals for benefits, experts said. On the other hand, reconsideration often reaffirms the findings of an initial decision and often adds extra time to process a disability case.
    Consequently, experts questioned whether the reconsideration step was a necessary part of the process. Eliminating it altogether may reduce the application process time for individuals who urgently need financial support.

    The Social Security Administration has tested eliminating the reconsideration stage, though it has not shared the results, according to Camp.
    “If there is a data-driven reason for reconsideration, show us,” Camp said.
    Jennifer Burdick, co-chair of the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities Social Security Task Force, also questioned the need for the practice, which is “largely seen as a rubber stamp,” she said.
    Eliminating that phase of the process could free disability determination services staff to work on initial disability claims and reduce backlog, she said.

    2. Increase funding for Social Security Administration

    Congressional Republicans have proposed a 30% federal budget cut, which would be “completely devastating” to the Social Security Administration, said Kerr-Davis.
    Office hours for the agency’s field offices would be shortened, while disability benefit applicants would see wait times increase by at least two months, she added.

    Aleksandr Zubkov | Moment | Getty Images

    Even level funding from fiscal year 2023 into 2024 would be detrimental to the agency, Kerr-Davis said, as it would not be enough money to build the disability determination services workforce or maintain it.
    “There just needs to be more bodies to work these claims,” Burdick said. “This won’t happen unless Congress provides SSA with meaningful sustained funding consistent with the President’s 2024 budget request.”

    3. Ensure Social Security uses current resources wisely

    While the Social Security Administration is unable to keep up with its current disability claims, it is spending hundreds of millions of dollars on outreach efforts to increase claims, Ferguson noted.
    “It feels like those dollars should be going to address the issue that is at hand,” Ferguson said.
    In the past 12 years, the agency has invested more than $300 million to obtain up-to-date occupational data that can be used to determine whether a claimant can work in today’s economy.
    Yet the Social Security Administration continues to rely on occupational data that is more than 30 years out of date, he noted.
    “The SSA is making it harder for claimants and making more work for itself,” Ferguson said. More

  • in

    Op-ed: Fixed income is back in the spotlight. Here’s how investors can take advantage

    Register now for CNBC’s virtual Your Money event on November 9th

    In recent quarters, we have witnessed a dramatic shift higher in interest rates, a move that investors should not fear but embrace. Bonds are now all the rage.
    The current real yield on a 10-year Treasury is approaching 2.5%, a level that should excite bond investors.
    Return expectations are the highest in years and, although markets could remain volatile, now is the appropriate time to reassess your portfolio and consider an increase in your fixed-income allocation.

    Peshkova | Istock | Getty Images

    Fixed-income investing is entering an exciting new era, and investors should take notice. Decades of low interest rates, engineered by global central banks, have suppressed the bond market’s ability to generate attractive and reliable returns.
    But in recent quarters, we have witnessed a dramatic shift higher in interest rates, a move that investors should not fear but embrace. Bonds are now all the rage in investing circles and, although not as trendy as Taylor Swift, their popularity has certainly risen in recent months alongside interest rates.

    Interest rates have increased dramatically since the beginning of 2022. As an example, the yield-to-maturity on the benchmark U.S. 10-year Treasury is now nearing 5%, up over 3.30%.

    More from Your Money:

    Here’s a look at more stories on how to manage, grow and protect your money for the years ahead.

    The yield on the 10-year and other Treasury bonds is now the highest since the onset of the Great Financial Crisis in 2007. In addition to the rise in nominal interest rates, we have also experienced a similar increase in real interest rates (rates adjusted for inflation).
    If we use market-derived, forward-looking expectations of inflation to adjust nominal yields, the current real yield on a 10-year Treasury is approaching 2.5%, a level that should excite bond investors.

    Granted, the journey to higher yields has been painful to bond investors. In 2022, the total return of the Bloomberg Aggregate Bond Index, a broad universe of U.S. taxable bonds, posted a return of -13.01% (according to Bloomberg as of Dec. 31, 2022), the worst calendar year performance for this index since its inception in 1976.
    Other bond market sectors experienced similar distress, but with the pain comes the gain. Higher rates can now provide more total return and more stability in returns going forward.

    When calculating fixed-income returns for most bonds, there are two components: price return and income return.

    At the start of 2022, there was little income being generated from high-quality bonds. The negative total returns for the year were driven by large price declines with a small positive contribution from income.
    As an example, the Bloomberg Aggregate Bond Index posted a price return of -15.3% and an income return of +2.3%. However, the yield-to-maturity on the Bloomberg Aggregate Index is now 5.64% (according to Bloomberg as of Oct. 17, 2023), over 3.5% higher than the beginning of 2022.
    As a result, we would expect a much larger positive contribution to future returns from income and a less negative contribution from price return.

    How can an investor take advantage of the higher-yield environment?

    We would suggest that investors reassess their current bond allocation and marginally increase their exposure in a manner consistent with their portfolio’s current position, investment objectives and risk tolerance.
    While we are not calling the top in near-term rate movements, we do believe we are entering more of a range-bound yield market for longer maturity bonds. This is consistent with our expectations of no additional rate hikes from the Federal Reserve this cycle and a continued decline in near-term inflation.
    To efficiently capture the higher yields, we would advise a modest increase in longer-dated maturity bonds as well as an allocation to shorter maturity bonds in a barbell approach, while avoiding intermediate maturity where possible.
    Given the inverted shape of the yield curve, a barbell approach can help maximize the overall yield of the portfolio and provide additional return should long-end rates move lower.

    For non-taxable or investors that are not tax-sensitive, we would prefer the use of higher-quality corporate bonds, as we believe the market has not appropriately priced the risk of a potential recession in lower-quality bonds.
    Additionally, the agency mortgage-backed securities market is a high-quality sector for investors to consider. Year to date, this sector has underperformed other investment grade sectors and now offers an attractive risk-return profile.
    For those investors in high-income tax brackets, municipal bonds are attractive. Similar to our view on taxable bonds, we would recommend a bias toward higher-quality bonds as a potential recession could negatively impact lower-rated municipalities.
    While we currently favor municipal bonds for those high-tax investors, we would not eliminate corporate bonds or other taxable securities from consideration. Certain market conditions can favor taxable bonds on an after-tax, risk-adjusted basis.
    It’s important that investors select a manager who can take advantage of those opportunities when they arise to create a tax-efficient portfolio.

    To the extent that interest rates move significantly higher, counter to our expectations, we would view this as an opportunity for investors to lock in even higher yields for longer. Under such a scenario, we would not expect a repeat of 2022 bond market returns.
    We estimate that interest rates would have to increase by 0.70% to 1.00% before forward-looking 12-month total returns would turn negative for the major bond indexes.
    We have little doubt that the heightened level of market volatility will continue into 2024. Opportunities present themselves when market volatility increases.
    To that end, we recommend an active approach to fixed-income management. Having the flexibility to successfully navigate and benefit during challenging markets allows for better returns.
    It is a new dawn for bonds and fixed-income investors. Return expectations are the highest in years and, although markets could remain volatile, now is the appropriate time to reassess your portfolio and consider an increase in your fixed-income allocation.
    — By Christopher Gunster, head of fixed income at Fidelis Capital More

  • in

    Union workers ‘are catching up’ on pay as labor organizing surges

    Compensation for union workers in the U.S. is up 11.5% since the first quarter of 2020, compared with 14.6% for nonunion workers.
    The rise in pay growth for unionized employees this year stems in part from significant labor action.
    Still, many unionized workers haven’t negotiated a new contract since the Covid-19 pandemic began.

    United Auto Workers members and supporters rally at the Stellantis North America headquarters in Auburn Hills, Michigan, on Sept. 20, 2023.
    Bill Pugliano | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    While predictions across the board about employee pay are forecasting slower wage growth next year, there’s a notable exception: union workers, especially those in service and manufacturing roles.
    They have a long way to go. Compensation for union workers is up just 11% since the first quarter of 2020, compared with 14.6% for nonunion workers, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data from the second quarter of 2023.

    However, wages for union workers grew 4.6% alone in the second quarter of 2023, narrowing the gap with employees who do not belong to unions. The rise in pay growth for unionized employees this year stems, in part, from significant labor action, including a string of labor deals resulting in higher pay.
    More from Personal Finance:Most middle-income Americans still earn less than 3% on savingsThe ‘radically different’ wage growth forecast in 2024Job perks other than a 4-day workweek may be an easier to get
    The latest data does not reflect recent deals between the United Auto Workers and Ford Motor Company, General Motors and Stellantis, where some employees could receive 25% wage increases. At Ford and Stellantis, employees could see their top wage boosted to more than $40 an hour, and starting wages could jump 68%, to $28 an hour, the UAW said.
    While those pay jumps seem significant, collective bargaining agreements are often locked in for several years due to contracting periods and restrictions for how workers can negotiate. Many unionized workers, for example, haven’t negotiated a new contract since the Covid-19 pandemic began.
    “Unionized workers couldn’t see the same scale of wage increases over the past few years that non-unionized workers did,” said Aaron Terrazas, Glassdoor’s chief economist. “To some degree, they’re now catching up.”

    In other words, it is a particularly prudent time for unionized workers to organize as they enter new contracting periods, experts day.
    Cumulative wage growth is still faster for nonunionized workers than for unionized workers, but the gap is narrowing, said Julia Pollak, chief economist at ZipRecruiter.
    Through Oct. 9 this year, approximately 453,000 workers have participated across a total of 312 strikes, significantly higher than the 180 strikes involving 43,700 workers during the same period two years ago.
    The data is compiled by Johnnie Kallas, a Ph.D. candidate at Cornell University’s School of Industrial and Labor Relations, and the project director of the ILR Labor Action Tracker.

    Union jobs can be less vulnerable, though underpaid

    In general, union worker wages are less vulnerable to booms and busts in the labor market compared to nonunionized workers, Terrazas said.
    “The end result is that the strikes seem like they’re kind of picking up while wages are kind of winding down,” Indeed economist Cory Stahle explained.
    On the opposite end, LaCinda Glover, a senior principal consultant at Mercer, said she did not expect to see large upward swings in compensation in tech and health care, both of which are fighting layoff or financial pressures from increased spending during the pandemic.
    “They have invested so much in compensation over the last few years that it’s really not sustainable,” she said.Don’t miss these CNBC PRO stories: More

  • in

    With Gen Z, millennials now the biggest ‘dupe’ shoppers, online culture has ‘flipped the script,’ analyst says

    Dupes, short for “duplicate,” are cheaper alternatives to premium or luxury products and they are increasingly popular among Gen Z and millennial shoppers.
    “The online culture of dupe shopping, accelerated by TikTok especially in the last few years, has flipped the script,” said Ellyn Briggs, brands analyst at Morning Consult.
    TikTok videos with the #dupe hashtag have racked up nearly six billion views to date, and 70% of intentional dupe shoppers have a TikTok account.

    Aire Images | Moment | Getty Images

    So-called girl math is not the only trend spurred by users on the short-form video app TikTok. “Dupes,” short for “duplicate,” are cheaper alternatives to premium or luxury consumer products, and they are increasingly popular among Gen Z and millennial shoppers and app users.
    While nearly one-third of adults, 31%, have intentionally purchased a dupe of a premium product at some point, Gen Z and millennials have higher participation rates: roughly 49% and 44%, respectively, according to Morning Consult. The business intelligence company polled 2,216 U.S. adults in early October.

    “The online culture of dupe shopping, accelerated by TikTok especially in the last few years, has flipped the script,” said Ellyn Briggs, brands analyst at Morning Consult.
    More from Personal Finance:Buy now, pay later or retail credit cards?The ‘ideal booking window’ for holiday airfare is closingHomebuyers must earn over $400,000 to afford a home here
    Instead of being an indicator of lower status or considered “shameful,” dupe shopping is now “something that’s actually a prideful thing for consumers,” she added.
    While shoppers may miss out on the experience luxury products provide, dupes are less expensive versions that help consumers save money and test an item before splurging on the real thing.
    “Yes, a dupe can give you this sense of ‘gaming the system,'” said New York-based writer Marisa Meltzer, “but it’s not going to be the same feeling you get with an expensive product.”

    Meltzer has been covering the fashion industry as a freelance writer for more than a decade and recently published her book titled “Glossy: Ambition, Beauty, and the Inside Story of Emily Weiss’s Glossier.”

    A way to ‘partake in that product experience’

    Unlike a counterfeit product, which tends to carry an unauthorized trademark or logo of a patented brand, dupes simply mimic certain features of more expensive products.
    They also help consumers determine whether the replica is as good as the real version, said Briggs.
    When shoppers were polled on the reasons they buy dupes instead of brand-name products, “money was the top answer,” said Briggs — especially for a group whose income level is relatively low.

    To wit, 49% of respondents reported a household income below $50,000. Additionally, 67% of polled consumers said saving money is a major deciding factor, the report from Morning Consult found.
    “It’s a way for [consumers] to partake in that product experience without having to spend a high amount of money,” Briggs said.
    TikTok videos with the #dupe hashtag have racked up nearly six billion views to date, and 70% of intentional dupe shoppers have a TikTok account, the report found.

    However, while discourse about dupes is strongly associated with TikTok and the shopping tendency remains prevalent for now among younger retailers, shopping for dupes could become a mainstream tendency across generations as the information becomes more accessible, Meltzer said.
    In the end, it’s a personal decision for consumers, who should make an assessment of what is best or financially feasible for them, Briggs said.
    “It depends how much you want it and why you want it,” added Meltzer. “I think everyone needs to find their splurge where it makes the most sense for them.”Don’t miss these CNBC PRO stories: More

  • in

    Treasury Department announces new Series I bond rate of 5.27% for the next six months

    Register now for CNBC’s virtual Your Money event on November 9th

    Series I bonds, an inflation-protected and nearly risk-free asset, will pay 5.27% through April 2024, the U.S. Department of the Treasury announced Tuesday.
    Based on inflation data, it’s the fourth-highest rate since I bonds were introduced in 1998.
    However, investors need to consider the downsides, along with their goals, before purchasing.

    Jitalia17 | E+ | Getty Images

    The U.S. Department of the Treasury announced Series I bonds will pay 5.27% annual interest from Nov. 1 through April 2024, up from the 4.3% annual rate offered since May.
    Tied to inflation, investors can claim 5.27% for six months — the fourth-highest I bond rate since 1998 — by purchasing any time from Nov. 1 through the end of April 2024. 

    More from Your Money:

    Here’s a look at more stories on how to manage, grow and protect your money for the years ahead.

    How to calculate I bond rates

    The Treasury adjusts I bond rates every May and November, and there are two parts to I bond yields: a variable and fixed portion.
    The variable rate moves every six months based on inflation, and the Treasury can change the fixed rate every six months, but that doesn’t always happen.

    The fixed portion of the I bond rate remains the same for investors after purchase. The variable rate resets every six months starting on the investor’s I bond purchase date, not when the Treasury announces new rates. You can find the rate by purchase date here.

    Currently, the variable rate is 3.94% and the fixed rate is 1.30%, for a rounded combined yield of 5.27% on I bonds purchased between Nov. 1 and April 30.
    “The new fixed rate makes it a very good deal” for long-term investors, said Ken Tumin, founder and editor of DepositAccounts.com, which tracks I bonds, among other assets.

    How new rates affect older I bonds

    If you already own I bonds, your rate change depends on the bonds’ issue date.For example, if you bought I bonds in September on any given year, your rates reset each year on March 1 and Sept. 1, according to the Treasury. 
    However, the headline rate may be different than what you receive because the fixed rate stays the same for the life of your bond. 

    What to know before buying I bonds

    Before purchasing I bonds, it’s important to consider your goals, experts say.
    One of the downsides of I bonds is you can’t access the money for at least one year and you’ll trigger a three-month interest penalty by tapping the funds within five years.
    “I don’t consider I bonds as part of a long-term portfolio,” said certified financial planner Christopher Flis, founder of Resilient Asset Management in Memphis, Tennessee.
    I bonds may make sense as a supplement to savings that you can access more quickly, such as money in a checking account, savings account or money market funds, he said.

    Frequently asked questions about I bonds
    1. What’s the interest rate from Nov. 1 to April 30, 2024? 5.27% annually.
    2. How long will I receive 5.27%? Six months after purchase.
    3. What’s the deadline to get 5.27% interest? Bonds must be issued by April 30, 2024. The purchase deadline may be earlier.
    4. What are the purchase limits? $10,000 per person every calendar year, plus an extra $5,000 in paper I bonds via your federal tax refund.
    5. Will I owe income taxes? You’ll have to pay federal income taxes on interest earned, but no state or local tax.

    Don’t miss these CNBC PRO stories: More

  • in

    62% of Americans are still living paycheck to paycheck, making it ‘the main financial lifestyle,’ report finds

    The number of Americans who say they are stretched too thin has shown no signs of improvement amid high prices and higher interest rates.
    Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell recently said “inflation is still too high,” indicating that interest rates will stay higher for longer.
    One bright spot: Some online savings account rates are now paying more than 5%, which is the most savers have been able to earn in nearly two decades.

    ‘Inflation is still too high’

    The Federal Reserve is expected to announce it will leave rates unchanged at the end of its two-day meeting this week, even though Fed Chair Jerome Powell recently said “inflation is still too high.”
    Recent data is painting a mixed picture of where the economy stands. Inflation has shown some signs of cooling, but the core personal consumption expenditures price index, which the Fed uses as a key measure, increased 0.3% in September.
    The consumer price index, another closely followed inflation gauge, also rose at a slightly faster-than-expected pace over the month, boosted by higher prices for food, gas and shelter. As a result, real average hourly earnings fell.

    The consensus among economists and central bankers is that interest rates will now stay higher for longer.

    Households must make ‘tough choices’

    “Many households are seeing their finances stretched thinly by the combination of high prices for goods and services as well as high interest rates,” said Brett House, economics professor at Columbia Business School.
    “Many are having to make tough choices to defer discretionary spending in order to stay on top of their loan payments and the costs of necessities,” he added. The resumption of student loan payments only adds to this stress.

    Some 74% of Americans say they are stressed about finances, according to a separate CNBC Your Money Financial Confidence Survey conducted in August. Inflation, rising interest rates and a lack of savings contribute to those feelings.
    That CNBC survey found that 61% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, up from 58% in March.
    Many households have tapped their cash reserves over the past few months, LendingClub and other reports show.
    Nearly half, or 49%, of adults have less savings or no savings compared to a year ago, according to a Bankrate survey.
    On the upside, those with remaining balances, which are concentrated among high-income households, are seeing “better interest payments than they’ve received at any time in the recent past,” House said.
    High-yield savings accounts, certificates of deposit and money market accounts are now paying more than 5%, according to Bankrate, which is the most savers have been able to earn in nearly two decades.
    Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.Don’t miss these CNBC PRO stories: More

  • in

    In some states, it’s ‘nearly impossible’ to buy a home that isn’t part of a homeowners association, expert says

    Jewel Inostroza was very excited when she bought her home in Newnan, Georgia, in 2008.
    “It seemed like it was a very nice, cozy, close-knit community,” said the 54-year-old. “Then it started turning into a horror story.”

    Inostroza is the only one listed on the deed, but she and her husband Enrique, 48, share financial responsibility of the home.
    They became aware after they moved in that they had bought into a “common-interest community.” Typically, that means real estate where owners pay a portion of expenses connected to shared amenities and common areas. These communities are usually overseen by homeowners associations.
    Homeowners associations, also known as HOAs, are self-governing organizations that implement rules for homeowners and renters within common-interest communities. A board of directors, made up of volunteer homeowners in the community, run the HOA. The board may choose to hire a management company, many of which are for-profit, to help run day-to-day operations.
    More from Personal Finance:53% of Gen Z see high cost of living as a barrier to successSeries I bonds rate could top 5% in NovemberStudent loan borrowers hit snags as bills resume
    It’s becoming increasingly common for new homeowners to find themselves in an HOA-governed property. Roughly 84% of newly built, single-family homes sold in 2022 belonged to homeowners associations, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

    “In most southern states and western states, it’s nearly impossible for a homebuyer to locate a single-family home that’s not part of some sort of HOA,” said Deborah Goonan, administrator of the blog Independent American Communities. “Certain local governments require almost all new construction to have an HOA.”

    How a $200 annual HOA fee became a $12,000 burden

    The Inostrozas’ annual HOA dues are $200. On paper, their HOA membership doesn’t seem like much of a financial burden — but that has not been their reality.
    The couple was surprised to find after they moved in that their property had an outstanding balance from before they bought it: unpaid dues, along with other penalties and charges.
    The HOA was “fining us for that balance and late fees and any other type of fines that they would put onto the home for lawn care or anything,” said Jewel Inostroza. “All of that was attached to this home when we moved in.”

    Jewel Inostroza and Enrique Inostroza stand in the doorway of their home in Newnan, Georgia.
    Mark Licea | CNBC

    The couple was unwilling to pay those fines and said the HOA and its management company at the time, Homeowners Management LLC, were not responsive to their attempts to get the balance voided. Documentation reviewed by CNBC from as early as 2012 shows that the balance continued to grow. The Inostrozas said communication with the HOA prior to 2011 was by phone.
    By August 2015, the HOA put a lien on the Inostrozas’ home. In the court documents, the HOA said the Inostrozas owed more than $1,600.
    A lien is when a party has a legal claim against an asset, such as a home, which can serve as collateral to satisfy unpaid debt. This can open the door to an HOA or other complainant escalating to the next level of debt collection, such as foreclosing on the home or, in the Inostrozas’ case, garnishing wages.
    In mid-2015, Jewel Inostroza said the HOA began garnishing wages directly from her paycheck to satisfy the unpaid fees.
    “The first time I learned of that was when I got my first paycheck that they garnished,” she said. “I didn’t get any prior notice.
    “There was nothing sent,” Jewel Inostroza added. “I got a notice two weeks after.”
    Despite the garnishment, invoices from the HOA reviewed by CNBC do not show any reduction in the total balance owed. By December 2016, documents show the Inostrozas owed the HOA more than $4,300.
    The Inostrozas hired a lawyer, who they say came to an agreement in 2016 with the HOA’s attorneys to stop the garnishment. Under that agreement, the Inostrozas would pay approximately $3,100 in installments. They finished paying that amount off by this past January, according to documentation reviewed by CNBC.
    “But it seemed like [the deal] never got to the management [company] or homeowners association,” Enrique Inostroza said. “They were just adding fines and adding interest.”
    The Inostrozas estimate they’ve paid about $12,000 in fines and garnished wages to the HOA in addition to thousands in legal fees to their lawyer. As of Aug. 18, 2023, the most recent invoice the Inostrozas received, the HOA says they owe nearly $8,000.
    CNBC reached out multiple times to Homeowners Management LLC for comment and received automated responses directing us to contact the current management company, which changed hands as of August 2023.
    A representative of the current management company, Sentry Management, told CNBC because it “just became the management company for this community in the last couple of months, [Sentry has] little ability to comment on historical facts,” regarding the Inostrozas’ case.
    “Once a homeowner has been referred to an attorney for delinquency, which happened well before Sentrywas involved, the homeowner needs to resolve the matter with the association’s attorney,” Bradley Pomp, president of Sentry Management, explained to CNBC in an email. “We do not have any authority to get involved or bring settlement.”
    The attorneys that represent the HOA did not respond to CNBC’s repeated requests for comment.
    The former director of the HOA board, who oversaw the association from 2020 until her resignation in October 2023, declined to comment.

    The case for HOAs

    A big part of many HOA sales pitches is that the presence of the organization helps increase property values.
    “The board is responsible for protecting property values,” said Tom Skiba, CEO of the Community Associations Institute, a membership organization of homeowner and condominium associations. “For most people in the U.S., [their homes are] the single biggest investment they’re ever going to make.”
    There’s mixed data about the effects HOAs have on property values.
    On average, HOA homes cost at least 4% — or $13,500 — more on average than non-HOA homes, according to a 2019 study in the Journal of Economics. But those property values can vary significantly by location. A 2019 analysis from Critical Housing Analysis of three different U.S. cities found that the home values in HOA areas were less than those in neighborhoods without them.
    HOAs can also be necessary to manage shared amenities or land, which can be a value-add for homeowners. In single-family home communities, that could be shared swimming pools or even golf courses. They may also offer homeowners services to help maintain their properties.
    “There are associations out there that handle all the landscaping,” Skiba said. “Even though you may own your lot, the association cuts the grass and they do all the landscaping. You find that very commonly in over 55 communities where folks just don’t want to be bothered with that kind of task anymore. So is that a cost savings? Sure.”

    ‘They act as hyperlocal governments’

    The Inostrozas’ experience with their HOA highlights some patterns of power dynamics seen across the country.
    More than half, 57%, of homeowners with an HOA dislike the arrangement, and more than 3 in 10 say they feel their HOA has too much power, according to a 2023 survey conducted by Rocket Mortgage. The lender surveyed 1,001 Americans with an HOA.
    “They act as hyperlocal governments and, in many ways, supersede all the other laws that exist,” said Steve Horvath, co-founder of advocacy group HOA United.

    HOAs are rooted in “the desire for municipalities to offload their responsibilities for taking care of things that you would normally associate with paying your taxes,” Horvath said, such as maintaining sidewalks, roads and sewers.
    Homeowners who have disputes with their HOA say they have trouble getting help from official government channels.
    “The only rights that homeowners have is to take them to civil court,” said Raelene Schifano, co-founder of HOA United. “And it’s not a successful project.”
    Lawmakers in several states, including Maryland, North Carolina and Florida, have introduced legislation to address some of the issues homeowners have been raising about HOAs, but they have been met with backlash from the professional management industry.
    As of right now, change has to happen at the grassroots level, with homeowners fighting through the court system as well as through voting for a board they feel represents them.
    Watch the video to learn more about how homeowners associations are shaping American neighborhoods. More