More stories

  • in

    Despite economic uncertainty, you can still build and preserve generational wealth, experts say

    Despite economic uncertainty, it’s still possible to build and preserve generational wealth, according to experts at CNBC’s Financial Advisor Summit.
    “The No. 1 cause of great loss of wealth is concentration,” said Mel Lagomasino, CEO and managing partner of WE Family Offices.

    Kate_sept2004 | E+ | Getty Images

    Despite economic uncertainty, it’s still possible to build and preserve generational wealth, experts said Thursday at CNBC’s Financial Advisor Summit.  
    “There’s a real chance of a soft landing” for the economy, said Mel Lagomasino, CEO and managing partner of WE Family Offices, which has locations in New York City and Miami. “But I think we’ll still have an earnings recession,” she said, pointing to rising costs of labor amid worker strikes.

    While rising interest rates have triggered stock market volatility, they have created competitive options for investors. “Now for a change, they’re getting paid,” Lagomasino said. “They can put money in very liquid, very safe investments and get 5%, 6% or 7%.”

    More from FA 100:

    Here’s a look at more coverage of CNBC’s FA 100 list of top financial advisory firms for 2023:

    But through the end of 2023, “it’s going to be tricky, particularly with the geopolitical environment,” she said, urging investors to stay “very liquid.”

    Biggest threats to generational wealth

    With some experts still predicting a recession, experts at the summit said it’s also important to protect generational wealth.
    “The No. 1 cause of great loss of wealth is concentration,” said Lagomasino, emphasizing the risk of having “a lot of eggs in one basket.”

    The No.1 cause of great loss of wealth is concentration.

    Mel Lagomasino
    CEO and managing partner of WE Family Offices

    Concentration risk was magnified in the tech community during the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and First Republic earlier this year, said Rodney Williams, co-founder of SoLo Funds. “That effect was felt across so many different areas.”

    That’s why “diversification is key,” he said.
    Leverage is another big risk, especially when paired with excess spending, Lagomasino said. It can be a “toxic cocktail” for an investor who hasn’t diversified. 
    “You can concentrate for a moment in time and then you diversify,” Williams added. “That’s the game.”   More

  • in

    Year-end tax strategies may affect how much retirees pay for Medicare. Here’s what to know

    Year-end Planning

    How much retirees pay for Medicare Part B premiums is based on their incomes.
    An income increase of just $1 may trigger higher rates.
    Here’s how year-end tax strategies may influence how much retirees pay for Medicare Part B coverage in future years.

    Fg Trade Latin | E+ | Getty Images

    Social Security beneficiaries are set to receive a 3.2% increase to their benefits in 2024 based on the annual cost-of-living adjustment, the Social Security Administration announced on Thursday.
    The change will result in an estimated Social Security retirement benefit increase of more than $50 per month, on average. The average monthly retirement benefit for workers will be $1,907, up from $1,848 this year, according to the Social Security Administration.

    But beneficiaries won’t know exactly how much of an increase they will see until December, when they receive their annual benefit statements, Mary Beth Franklin, a certified financial planner and Social Security expert, said Thursday during the CNBC Financial Advisor Summit.

    More from Year-End Planning

    Here’s a look at more coverage on what to do finance-wise as the end of the year approaches:

    One factor that may offset those benefit increases is the size of Medicare Part B premiums, which are typically deducted directly from monthly Social Security checks.
    “You will be getting a larger Social Security benefit next year,” Franklin said.
    “But remember, depending on your income, you may also be paying a lot more for Medicare,” Franklin said.

    Medicare Part B premiums are based on income

    Medicare Part B covers physician services, outpatient hospital services, some home health care services, durable medical equipment and certain other services not covered by Medicare Part A.

    Medicare Part B premiums for 2024 have not yet been announced. The Medicare trustees have projected the standard monthly premium may be $174.80 in 2024, up from $164.90 in 2023.
    But some beneficiaries may pay much higher rates based on their incomes, in what is known as income-related monthly adjustment amounts, or IRMAA.
    In 2023, you pay the $164.90 standard Part B premium if you file individually and have $97,000 or less (or $194,000 or less for couples) in modified adjusted gross income on your federal tax return in 2021.
    Those monthly premiums go up to as much as $560.50 per month for individuals with incomes of $500,000 and up, or couples with $750,000 and up.
    No matter the monthly Part B premium rate, beneficiaries get the “exact same Medicare services,” according to Franklin.

    It is truly like a hurricane for your health care costs in retirement.

    Mary Beth Franklin
    CFP and Social Security expert

    If your income goes up by even $1, you may be bumped up to a higher Medicare Part B premium tier and have to pay extra.
    “It is truly like a hurricane for your health care costs in retirement,” Franklin said.
    In 2024, the monthly Part B premiums will be based on information in 2022 federal tax returns.
    Beneficiaries and their financial advisors would be wise to pay attention to how their incomes may change, and therefore affect Medicare Part B premium rates, when implementing three year-end tax strategies, Franklin said.

    1. Roth conversions

    A Roth conversion happens when pre-tax funds from a traditional IRA or an eligible qualified retirement plan like a 401(k) are moved to a post-tax retirement account.
    While this triggers an immediate tax bill because that money is treated as income for the year, it frees up the possibility for tax-free retirement withdrawals later.
    However, that extra income for this year may trigger higher Medicare Part B premiums later, Franklin warned.
    “Advisors may want to reach out to their clients and say, ‘Remember, for long-term tax planning purposes, we did that Roth IRA conversion?” Franklin said. “‘Your Medicare premium may go up. But it might just be a one-year hit.'”

    2. Tax loss harvesting

    As the year ends, one popular strategy advisors may employ is tax loss harvesting, where some investments are sold at a loss to offset the capital gains owed on other profitable investments.
    This strategy may help reduce adjusted gross income and future Medicare premiums, Franklin said.

    3. Qualified charitable distributions

    Retirees who are taking distributions from IRAs and who want to make charitable donations may want to consider making those contributions directly from their retirement accounts in what is known as a qualified charitable distribution.
    “That money does not show up on your tax return, and will not boost your income taxes or your future Medicare premiums,” Franklin said.
    Of note, even though required minimum distributions now start at age 73 (if you reach age 72 after Dec. 31, 2022), qualified charitable distributions are still available to retirees ages 70½ or older, Franklin noted. More

  • in

    Mortgage rates near 8%, an ‘inventory crisis’: Homebuyers face a ‘tricky’ market, expert says

    The housing market is dealing with several “tricky” dynamics, said Tracy Kasper, president of the National Association of Realtors.
    Those dynamics include an “inventory crisis” and the highest mortgage rates in decades.

    Prospective buyers visit an open house for sale in Alexandria, Virginia.
    Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

    The housing market is dealing with several “tricky” dynamics, according to Tracy Kasper, president of the National Association of Realtors.
    “What we’ve experienced over the last probably 12 to 18 months is what I really like to call a leveling,” Kasper said Thursday during CNBC’s Financial Advisor Summit.

    That slowdown in home sales comes after “exponential increases year over year” during the Covid-19 pandemic, Kasper said.
    With fewer people selling their houses, she said, there is now an “inventory crisis.”
    “We’ve seen a crunch — our first-time homebuyers are struggling,” she added.

    First-time homebuyers’ woes

    During the Covid-19 pandemic, first-time homebuyers found it hard to compete with other buyers who had more cash to spare, Kasper said.
    Now, they simply can’t find anything as current homeowners are reluctant to put their house on the market and give up existing low-rate mortgage.

    More from FA 100:

    Here’s a look at more coverage of CNBC’s FA 100 list of top financial advisory firms for 2023:

    Mortgage rates are currently approaching 8%, the highest level in decades, and have priced many first-time homebuyers out of the market, Kasper said.
    Higher rates add to monthly payments, which can mean it’s harder to qualify for a mortgage. Last year, lenders were denied loan applications due to “insufficient income” more often than any other point since records began in 2018, according to a new report from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
    “In most cases, income did not increase at the pace of average mortgage payments,” certified financial planner Barry Glassman, founder and president of Glassman Wealth Services in McLean, Virginia, recently told CNBC.
    Glassman is also a member of CNBC’s Financial Advisor Council.
    Given these obstacles, Kasper said real estate insiders are desperately seeking ways to increase inventory, including pushing for government incentives such as tax breaks for sellers.
    “We’re looking for any conversation that we can have, that would open up that inventory,” Kasper said.
    Housing and banking groups also sent a letter to the Federal Reserve this month, strongly encouraging the central bank to not contemplate further rate hikes. More

  • in

    The 60/40 portfolio ‘certainly isn’t dead,’ says senior wealth advisor

    The 60/40 portfolio is an important investment strategy for the average investor.
    Inflation and higher interest rates have stressed it.
    The strategy is still sound but perhaps needs tweaking, one expert said.

    Cravetiger | Moment | Getty Images

    The 60/40 portfolio — a cornerstone strategy for the average investor — has been stressed by the pandemic-era economy and market dynamics.
    However, “the 60/40 portfolio certainly isn’t dead,” Holly Newman Kroft, managing director and senior wealth advisor at asset manager Neuberger Berman, said Thursday at the semiannual CNBC Financial Advisor Summit.

    While not dead, “it needs to be modernized,” she added.

    More from Your Money:

    Here’s a look at more stories on how to manage, grow and protect your money for the years ahead.

    What is a 60/40 portfolio?

    The strategy allocates 60% to stocks and 40% to bonds — a traditional portfolio that carries a moderate level of risk.
    More generally, “60/40” is a sort of shorthand for the broader theme of investment diversification.
    The thinking is that when stocks — the growth engine of a portfolio — do poorly, bonds serve as a ballast since they often don’t move in tandem.
    The classic 60/40 mix is generally thought to include U.S. stocks and investment-grade bonds, like U.S. Treasury bonds and high-quality corporate debt.

    Why the 60/40 portfolio is stressed

    Through 2021, the 60/40 portfolio had performed well for investors.
    Investors got higher returns than those with more complex strategies during every trailing three-year period from mid-2009 to December 2021, according to an analysis authored last year by Amy Arnott, portfolio strategist for Morningstar.
    However, things have changed.
    Inflation spiked in 2022, peaking at a rate unseen in four decades. The U.S. Federal Reserve raised interest rates aggressively in response, which clobbered stocks and bonds.
    Bonds have historically served as a shock absorber in a 60/40 portfolio when stocks tank. But that defense mechanism broke down.

    How to rethink the 60/40

    That dynamic — stocks and bonds moving more in tandem — is likely to persist for a while, Paula Campbell Roberts, chief investment strategist for global wealth solutions at KKR, said at the summit.
    Indeed, while the Fed is unlikely to raise interest rates much higher (if at all), officials have also signaled they’re unlikely to cut rates anytime soon.
    And there are some risks for U.S. stocks going forward, experts said. For one, while the S&P 500 is up 14% this year, those earnings are concentrated in just 10 of the biggest stocks, Roberts said.
    That said, investors also benefit from higher interest rates since they can “access safer asset classes at a higher yield,” Kroft said. For example, banks are paying 5% to 5.5% on high yield cash accounts, and municipal bonds pay a tax-equivalent yield of about 7%, she said.

    The Fed’s “higher for longer” mentality means bonds should have these equity-like returns for a longer period, Kroft said.
    So, what does this mean for the 60/40 portfolio? For one, it doesn’t mean investors should dump their stocks, Kroft said.
    “You never want to exit the asset class,” she said.
    However, investors may consider substituting part — perhaps 10 percentage points — of their 60% stock allocation for so-called alternative investments, Kroft said.

    That would likely increase investment returns and, given the typical properties of “alts,” reduce the risk of those assets moving in tandem with stocks, Kroft said.
    Within the alts category, high net-worth investors can access certain things like private equity and private credit, Kroft said. The typical investor can gain alts access through more liquid funds — like a mutual fund or an exchange-traded fund — that focuses on alts, or via funds geared toward commodities, she added.
    She cautioned that affluent investors pursuing private equity need to be “very careful” in their selection of asset managers because the difference in performance between top-performing and mid-tier firms is “huge,” Kroft said.
    Within bonds, investors holding bonds with a short duration may want to consider extending that duration to lock in higher yields for longer, she added. More

  • in

    Reality does bite: Why Generation X is falling behind on retirement savings

    According to a recent report by the National Institute on Retirement Security, the typical Gen X household only has $40,000 in retirement savings in private accounts, and most Gen Xers are failing to meet retirement savings targets. 
    When broken down by generation, Gen Xers are most likely to feel behind on their retirement savings, a recent Bankrate study found.
    Here’s how the “sandwich generation” can get back on track.

    Ethan Hawke sits with Winona Ryder in a scene from the 1994 film “Reality Bites.”
    Universal Pictures | Moviepix | Getty Images

    As Generation X knows all too well, “reality bites,” to quote the iconic 1994 film of the same name.
    Most Gen Xers — roughly defined as those born between 1965 and 1980 — are failing to meet retirement savings targets. The typical Gen X household has just $40,000 in retirement savings in private accounts, according to the National Institute on Retirement Security.

    “When we think about retirement preparation, we worry about the large numbers of people who are not on track,” Dan Doonan, executive director of the National Institute on Retirement Security, said Thursday at CNBC’s Financial Advisor Summit.

    More from FA 100:

    Here’s a look at more coverage of CNBC’s FA 100 list of top financial advisory firms for 2023:

    Across the board, many Americans worry about their financial well-being and retirement plans. Over half of working adults feel behind on their retirement savings, according to a recent Bankrate study.
    But when broken down by generation, Gen Xers are most likely to feel this way, followed by baby boomers then millennials and then Gen Zers, Bankrate found. Gen X workers are also most likely to say they are contributing less to their retirement savings this year compared to last year.
    More than half of Gen X workers, or roughly 57%, think it is not likely they will save enough to retire comfortably, according to Bankrate.
    At the same time, the average 401(k) balance among Gen Xers is $153,300, up nearly 15% from a year ago, according to the latest data from Fidelity Investments, the nation’s largest provider of 401(k) plans. 

    Gen X savers have benefited significantly from improved defined contribution plans, including newer plan features such as auto enrollment and auto escalation.

    Why Gen X is falling behind

    Yet, “they still have a big savings gap relative to what they need in retirement,” Fiona Greig, global head of investor research and policy at Vanguard, said at the summit.
    Financial pressure from the rising costs of higher education and health care, as well as ballooning student loan balances, have weighed heavily, Vanguard’s retirement readiness report found.
    This generation is also projected to live longer than boomers, adding another hurdle to their savings shortfall. “They are living a full year longer, but they are not working a full year longer,” Greig said.

    How the ‘sandwich generation’ can get on track

    For clients in their 40s and 50s, “we dig into why they feel behind,” certified financial planner Lazetta Rainey Braxton, co-founder and co-CEO of 2050 Wealth Partners, said at the summit.
    Often, “life has happened and the financial responsibilities have increased,” said Braxton, who is also a member of CNBC’s Financial Advisor Council.

    They are the so-called “sandwich generation” for a reason, she added. “They are supporting the generations ahead of them and also building and expanding their family which requires resources for the generations behind them.”
    Still, there are investment vehicles available that can help, including what your employer offers and individual retirement accounts.
    “If they are coming to us a little later, we put everything on the table so we can move forward in a way that’s realistic,” said Braxton. More

  • in

    Social Security cost-of-living adjustment will be 3.2% in 2024, well below this year’s record-setting increase

    Jozef Polc / 500Px | 500Px Plus | Getty Images

    Social Security beneficiaries will see a 3.2% boost to their benefits in 2024, the Social Security Administration announced on Thursday.
    The annual cost-of-living adjustment for 2024 will affect more than 71 million Social Security and Supplemental Security Income beneficiaries. These benefit adjustments are made annually to help benefits keep place with inflation.

    The change will result in an estimated Social Security retirement benefit increase of $50 per month, on average. The average monthly retirement benefit for workers will be $1,907, up from $1,848 this year, according to the Social Security Administration.
    Most Social Security beneficiaries will see the increase in their monthly checks starting in January. SSI beneficiaries will see the increase in their December checks.
    The 2024 benefit increase is much lower than record 8.7% cost-of-living adjustment Social Security beneficiaries saw this year, the biggest boost in four decades in response to record high inflation. It is also lower than the 5.9% cost-of-living adjustment for 2022. 
    The 3.2% increase is in line with an estimate released last month by The Senior Citizens League, a nonpartisan senior group.
    The Social Security cost-of-living adjustment is calculated based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, or CPI-W.

    The 2024 adjustment comes as many retirees are still struggling with higher prices.
    This is breaking news. Please check back for updates. More

  • in

    As the U.S. birth rate falls, immigration reform may be ‘the answer hiding in plain sight,’ analyst says

    Year-end Planning

    The U.S. birth rate fell slightly in 2022 and still hasn’t recovered to pre-pandemic levels, which was already below the “replacement rate” to maintain the current population.
    Some policy experts point to immigration reform to boost tax revenue and bolster the economy.
    “The biggest hurdle has been polarization and politicization of immigration,” said Silva Mathema, director for immigration policy at the Center for American Progress.

    Demonstrators call for immigration reform near the White House on Feb. 14, 2022.
    Nicholas Kamm | AFP | Getty Images

    As the U.S. fertility rate continues to fall, there are growing concerns about the long-term economic impact: A smaller population means less tax revenue, which could reduce funding for programs such as Social Security and Medicare.
    But immigration policy reform could be one solution, some experts say.

    Lea este artículo en español aquí.

    The U.S. birth rate fell slightly in 2022 compared with 2021, with roughly 3.7 million babies born nationwide, and the birth rate still hasn’t recovered to pre-pandemic levels, according to an initial analysis from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  
    A growing concern for economists, the U.S. fertility rate has generally been below the replacement rate — which is needed to maintain the current population — since 1971 and has consistently been below the replacement rate since 2007. 

    More from Year-End Planning

    Here’s a look at more coverage on what to do finance-wise as the end of the year approaches:

    “The tax base is shrinking, and allowing immigrants to come in lawfully is an easy solution to that,” said Jackie Vimo, senior economic justice policy analyst at the National Immigration Law Center. “It’s the answer hiding in plain sight.”
    In 2022, foreign-born U.S. residents — including legally admitted immigrants, refugees, temporary residents and undocumented immigrants — represented about 18% of U.S. workers, up from 17.4% in 2021, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    A pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants would offer eligible workers better education and employment opportunities while boosting federal tax revenue, Vimo said.

    Reform could offer ‘huge benefits’ to tax base

    Depending on the scope of changes, immigration policy reform could provide “huge benefits” to the U.S. tax base and economy, said Silva Mathema, director for immigration policy at the Center for American Progress.
    In a 2021 report, the organization modeled the economic impact of four scenarios involving a pathway to legalization and citizenship for undocumented immigrants. 
    The most comprehensive option — a pathway to citizenship for all undocumented immigrants — would increase the U.S. gross domestic product by a total of $1.7 trillion over 10 years and create 438,800 new jobs, according to the report. Eligible workers would earn $14,000 more annually after 10 years.

    “Immigrants currently without a pathway to citizenship pay billions in taxes, even though they don’t benefit from many of the programs they pay into,” such as Social Security and Medicare, Vimo said.
    Undocumented immigrant-led households paid an estimated $18.9 billion in federal taxes and $11.7 billion in combined state and local taxes in 2019, according to the American Immigration Council.
    However, other experts caution that growing the U.S. population through expanded immigration may not boost tax revenue as expected because there’s little control over the ages of new residents.

    Immigrants currently without a pathway to citizenship pay billions in taxes, even though they don’t benefit from many of the programs they pay into.

    Jackie Vimo
    Senior economic justice policy analyst at the National Immigration Law Center

    “You will have a bigger economy, and you will have more tax revenue, but you will also have more people,” said Steven Camarota, director of research for the Center for Immigration Studies. “There’s no evidence your per capita GDP will go up.”

    The challenges of ‘common-sense policy’

    It’s been nearly 40 years since the country made significant changes to immigration policy. The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 “reset the clock and undocumented immigration” but didn’t address future inflows or ways for people to enter the country lawfully, Vimo said.
    “That’s the problem we’ve been facing for decades now,” she said. “And unfortunately, there hasn’t been a political environment in Washington to implement what is common-sense policy.”
    While nearly three-fourths of Americans say it’s “unacceptable” for people to immigrate illegally to the U.S., 56% support making legal immigration easier and 55% support a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who are already here, according to a 2021 survey of 2,600 U.S. adults by the Cato Institute.
    “The biggest hurdle has been polarization and politicization of immigration,” Mathema said. More

  • in

    5 ways to reduce credit card debt ahead of the holiday shopping season

    The average consumer carries about $6,000 in credit card debt — a 10-year high.
    A higher credit score can help you qualify for the lowest rates on credit cards and personal loans.
    For many consumers, a 0% interest balance transfer card is the best way to pay off credit card debt.

    Eleganza | E+ | Getty Images

    About half of holiday shoppers have already started making purchases or plan to begin by Halloween, according to a recent Bankrate survey.  Most of them will use credit cards to pay for at least some of their purchases, the survey shows.
    “A couple of years ago, early holiday shopping was all about the supply chain mess,” said Bankrate senior industry analyst Ted Rossman. “Now, I think the motivation is more financial.”

    Many consumers are anticipating the effect of inflation on what they’re buying, he said, and they’re stressed about the cost of holiday shopping. But it’s also important to consider the rising cost of carrying credit card debt.

    More from Your Money:

    Here’s a look at more stories on how to manage, grow and protect your money for the years ahead.

    Overall, credit card debt in the U.S. has reached a staggering record high of $1.03 trillion, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The average consumer carries about $6,000 in credit card debt — a 10-year high.
    Many Americans are also carrying more card debt month to month.
    “Part of what’s pushing debt higher is people struggling to make ends meet in the midst of high inflation,” said Matt Schulz, senior credit analyst at LendingTree. “They look at their credit card as a de facto emergency fund.”
    But consumers are paying an exorbitant price for having that credit. 

    The average credit card rate is now about 21%, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Yet Lending Tree finds the average interest rate on new card offers is 24.45%, the highest level since the firm started tracking credit card rates in 2019. Additionally, 1 out of 3 of the 200 cards it has reviewed has a rate of 29.99% or higher. 
    Here are five strategies to start paying off credit card debt before you begin holiday shopping: 

    1. Know what you owe

    First, get a handle on your debt and what you owe. Find out the interest rate you’re paying on the total balance on each credit card. If you know how much you owe and what you’re paying to borrow that money, it will be easier to come up with a plan to reduce your debt. 

    2. Review your credit report and score

    You can get free access to your credit reports online from each of the three major credit rating agencies — Equifax, Experian and TransUnion — at annualcreditreport.com to help you regularly manage your finances. 
    Check for errors, including accounts that aren’t yours or that you didn’t authorize, or incorrect information on credit card limits or loan balances. You can dispute these errors directly online on the credit agency’s websites.

    While the free credit reports on annualcreditreport.com will not include your credit score, many credit card companies offer their customers a free look at their credit scores. Often when you get your score, it also will give you the risk factors that are affecting your score and what you can work on to improve it. 
    Paying your credit card bills on time and using 10% or less of the available credit are important factors in raising your score. Higher scores can help you qualify for lower-rate cards or cards with promotional offers of 0% interest.

    3. Consider consolidating your debt

    One of the best ways to get rid of credit card debt is to consolidate it by using a 0% interest balance transfer card, but you may need to already have a credit score of 700 or higher to get one. 
    A 0% interest balance transfer card offers 12, 15 or even 21 months with no interest on transferred balances. You may be charged a 3% to 5% fee on the amount that you transfer, so crunch the numbers to make sure it is worth it. 
    For many consumers, it’s the “best weapon” for reducing credit card debt, Schultz said. “The ability to go up to 21 months without accruing any interest on that balance is really a game changer,” he added. “It can save you a lot of money. And it can dramatically reduce the time it takes to pay that balance off.”

    If you get a 0% interest card, be aggressive about paying off as much of the balance as you can with no interest during that introductory period. Generally, after that, it will adjust to a much higher interest rate.
    Another way to consolidate debt is with a personal loan. Currently, such loans come with an average annual percentage rate of about 12%, although a good credit score could garner you a rate as low as 8%. Only borrow enough money to pay off your credit card debt, not to spend more. 
    “You work with a lender,” said Rod Griffin, senior director for public education and advocacy at Experian. “They give you a personal loan that pays off those credit card debts that are a relatively low interest rate, usually over a long, longer term, but it can reduce your payments.
    “And all those credit card account payments would then be paid and reported as paid in full,” he added. “That’s key.” 

    4. Work with your card issuer

    If you don’t qualify for a 0% card or personal loan, contact your card issuer and ask for a lower credit card rate.
    Just make the call. A recent Lending Tree survey found about three-quarters of consumers who asked the issuer for a lower interest rate on their credit card in the past year got one — and they didn’t need a great credit score to get it. 
    If you’re really cash strapped, you could also try working out a debt settlement directly with the creditor. Your goal is to get the creditor to agree to settle your account for an amount that is less than what is owed because at least some payment is better than none. However, there may be some negative consequences, like a tax hit on the amount of debt that you don’t pay that has been forgiven. 

    Oleksandra Yagello | Moment | Getty Images

    Be wary of using debt settlement programs offered by outside companies. With a debt settlement company, instead of paying your creditor, you make a monthly payment into a separate bank account set up by that company.
    Once there is enough money in that account, that company will use the funds to negotiate with creditors for a lump sum payment that is less than what you owe. These programs can take years and you can wind up paying hefty fees, experts say.  
    “So you may be better off using those payments toward your existing debts and reducing those credit card payments yourself as opposed to paying a debt settlement firm,” Griffin said.

    5. Pick a repayment strategy and stick to it

    Once you have lowered the interest you’re paying on your credit card debt, you need to figure out how much you can truly afford to pay every month, every two weeks or every pay period. 
    Figure out how much you must pay for committed expenses such as rent or mortgage, utilities, food and transportation, as well as debt payments, including student loans and credit card bills. 
    Commit to putting a certain amount of your pay toward paying down your credit card debt — at least the minimum balance due on each card.
    If you have multiple cards to pay off, figure out whether you are going to prioritize paying off the highest-interest debt, known as the “avalanche method,” or paying off the smallest to largest balances, known as the “snowball method.”
    If you still prefer to use a credit card for daily expenses, make sure to pay it off in full every month while you’re paying down the balance on other cards. That’s known as the “island approach:” using different cards for different purposes with the goal of getting the lowest possible interest rate, rewards or cash back on each of them, for example. 
    One repayment strategy isn’t necessarily better than the other, but you need to have a plan — and stick to it.
    “There’s no quick fix,” said Griffin. “It takes time to get into debt; it takes time to dig your way out of debt.” The best solution “is usually the slow and steady, have a plan, pay it off over time and change your behaviors,” he added.
    JOIN ME: Thursday, November 9 for CNBC’s YOUR MONEY conference to hear from top financial experts about ways to maximize your finances and invest for a brighter future. Register here for this free virtual event!
    SIGN UP: Money 101 is an 8-week learning course to help you achieve financial freedom, delivered weekly to your inbox. More