More stories

  • in

    How to know when a robo-advisor makes sense — and when a human financial advisor should step in

    A robo-advisor is an automated digital program that creates and manages your portfolio based on your investment preferences and risk tolerance, according to Investor.gov. 
    Such programs can come at a lower cost compared to a financial advisor.
    But a robo-advisor’s services can only go so far, experts say.

    Alvaro Gonzalez | Moment | Getty Images

    In some cases, an investor can simply rely on a robo-advisor to manage their portfolios. But some instances may require a human financial advisor to take the lead, experts say.
    A robo-advisor is an automated digital program that creates and manages your portfolio based on your investment preferences and risk tolerance, according to Investor.gov. 

    Such programs typically come at a lower cost than traditional financial advisor services. In 2024, the median robo-advisor fee was 0.25% of assets per year, according to a recent Morningstar report. Human advisors typically charge around four times that amount, or 1% of assets under management.

    More from Financial Advisor Playbook:

    Here’s a look at other stories affecting the financial advisor business.

    However, a robo-advisor is “not going to look at your entire picture,” said Melissa Caro, a New York-based certified financial planner and founder of My Retirement Network, a financial literacy platform.
    Here’s how to understand if you can stick to a robo-advisor, if you need a human financial advisor, or if you can have a combination of both.

    A robo-advisor helps during the ‘accumulation phase’

    A robo advisor can be suitable for someone who’s still in the so-called “accumulation phase” — when they are starting out and building wealth by saving and investing, and don’t need more intricate services like tax planning, said Caro.
    “Things aren’t complicated in your life yet,” she said. 

    What’s more, most robo-advisor platforms require low minimum investment balances.
    According to the Morningstar report, a quarter of the robo-advisor platforms reviewed have an account minimum of $50 or less for the most basic services. Nearly every other provider has a minimum of $5,000 or less.

    Meanwhile, some financial advisors require higher minimum investment balances. Some might require $25,000 while others can be as much as $500,000, $1 million or more, according to SmartAsset.
    Still, such investment thresholds can be beneficial for both advisor and consumer, said Caro. For consumers, it helps you discern when a traditional advisor’s services may make sense.
    For example, if you’re someone who has their emergency fund set up and has an additional $10,000 to invest, using a robo-advisor platform can be a “great way to just start to familiarize yourself” with investing and how compounding works, she said. 
    “You don’t need to nor should you be paying a percentage of assets under management fee for your $10,000,” she said.

    ‘Ceiling of complexity’

    On the flip side, there comes a time where investors reach a “ceiling of complexity” and may benefit from a a person sitting across the table, said Dennis Morton, a CFP and the founder and principal of Morton Brown Family Wealth in Allentown, Pennsylvania.
    In addition to managing investment portfolios, a financial advisor can also offer other areas of expertise, such as insurance analysis, estate planning and multi-year tax planning, said CFP Zach Teutsch, the founder and a managing partner at Values Added Financial in Washington, D.C.
    “A robo-advisor may be doing none of that,” said Teutsch, a member of CNBC’s Financial Advisor Council.
    When discerning what’s the best approach for you, it’s important to ask yourself what questions or problems you’re trying to solve, who’s best equipped to solve it and at what price, he said.

    Hispanolistic | E+ | Getty Images

    If you’re simply looking for investment management and trading services, “robo-advisors can be less expensive,” said Morton.
    But if you’re somebody who needs specialized financial planning, a human financial advisor can provide a tailored approach, experts say.
    Whether you decide to go with a robo-platform or an advisor, make sure to research and compare the different services that are offered and at what costs, said Morton. 
    “There’s a lack of uniformity in what you can get,” he said. More

  • in

    ‘A perfect storm’ — more colleges at risk as enrollment falls and financial pressures mount

    In part due to the U.S. government’s recent changes to the student visa policy, there are fewer students on college campuses this fall.
    For financially vulnerable schools, any decline in enrollment comes at a price.
    As higher education faces increased headwinds, closures and mergers are looming “at a pace we haven’t seen since the Great Recession,” said Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education.

    Drew University in Madison, N.J.
    Courtesy: Drew University

    As college and university leaders returned to campus this fall, there were new signs that a long-building financial crisis may finally be reaching a breaking point.
    Closures and mergers are looming “at a pace we haven’t seen since the Great Recession,” said Ted Mitchell, president of the American Council on Education.

    The warning lights have been flashing for years. Fewer high school graduates are enrolling in college and the overall population of college-age students is shrinking, a trend experts refer to as the “demographic cliff.”
    Higher operating costs and limitations on tuition increases have restricted institutions’ ability to raise revenue, according to 2024 research by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. Higher education as a whole is “facing serious financial headwinds,” the report said.
    And now, international student enrollment is poised to drop off due to the Trump administration’s tougher visa rules and anti-immigrant policies, representing billions of dollars in lost tuition and stripping away one of higher ed’s most reliable financial lifelines.
    Add deep federal funding cuts, and the sector faces what Todd Wolfson, president of the American Association of University Professors, calls “a perfect storm.”
    Collectively, with fewer students and less money coming in, there are fewer resources for teachers, programs, and most importantly, financial aid. For many schools, there may not even be enough funds to stay open.

    International student enrollment is falling

    Last September, the U.S. hosted more than 1.2 million students from abroad, an all-time high, according to the latest data by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
    But in 2025, the number of international students on many U.S. college campuses is suddenly decreasing.
    Largely due to the Trump administration’s recent changes to the student visa policy — which deactivated and then reactivated the immigration status of thousands of students and put a temporary pause on new visa applicants — there may be as many as 150,000 fewer international students enrolled for the 2025-26 academic year, according to preliminary projections by NAFSA: Association of International Educators.
    That represents a 30%-40% drop in new students from abroad and a 15% decline in total international student enrollment, amounting to a loss of nearly $7 billion in economic impact, according to the findings, which are based in part on State Department data. 

    “International student enrollments are down massively,” said Wolfson.
    Chris Glass, a professor and higher education specialist at Boston College, said the NAFSA analysis was in line with his own projection based on applications for F-1 student visas in the spring, which were trending lower even before the pause on new applicants.
    However, new government data suggests that the total number of international students may not have declined to the extent NAFSA projected. “We just don’t know yet,” Glass said.

    Drew University in Madison, N.J.
    Courtesy: Drew University

    At Drew University in Madison, N.J., about one-third of new students from abroad either withdrew or deferred this semester due to visa denials or lack of appointments, according to Hilary Link, Drew’s president. 
    “For a small institution like Drew, we did see an impact,” Link said. International students — coming from 58 countries around the world — account for 14% of Drew’s total enrollment of roughly 2,200 students, according to the school. 

    Fewer students, less revenue

    Although international undergraduate and graduate students in the U.S. make up slightly less than 6% of the total U.S. higher education population, according to the Institute of International Education, they are an important source of revenue for schools. 
    U.S. colleges and universities need a contingent of foreign students, who typically pay full tuition, in addition to enhancing the diversity of perspectives in classrooms and on campuses, Mitchell said.
    More from Personal Finance:Trump administration to warn families about student debt risksAs colleges near the $100,000 mark, these schools are freeThese college majors have the best job prospects
    Altogether, international students who studied in the U.S. contributed $46.1 billion to the U.S. economy in the 2024-25 academic year, according to the most recent data by NAFSA, including tuition revenue as well as student spending, which extends well beyond higher education.
    Those funds support colleges’ ability to provide financial aid, Mitchell said. “Full-paying international students pay scholarships for domestic students — it’s a 1-to-1 relationship.”

    The colleges in jeopardy

    When it comes to which colleges will be hardest hit, “it’s a tale of two worlds,” said Jamie Beaton, co-founder and CEO of Crimson Education, a college consulting firm. On one hand, “top schools are really bulletproof.”
    In fact, Harvard University, which has been at the forefront of the escalating battle over international student visas, banked a recent win over the White House, freeing up $2.2 billion in grant funds.
    The nation’s most elite colleges, including the Ivy League, have large endowments, a diverse student body and an advanced pipeline of applicants that largely shield them from sudden shocks. “They can fill their entire class over and over and over again,” Beaton said.

    “These upper-tier schools are not without risk, but they have so many hedges against that risk they are more insulated from disruptions,” said Boston College’s Glass. “They are going to be the most resilient.”
    Alternatively, “there is a fair percentage of institutions essentially living month to month, or paycheck to paycheck,” Glass said. Those less competitive and tuition-driven institutions are “extremely vulnerable,” he said. “International students have been integrated into their enrollment strategy and their viability.”

    Mid-tier schools may also not be in the position to easily recruit other students, he added. “The pipeline is constricted, exposing them to risk.”
    Some “will feel the immediate pain,” he said. Others “are going to bleed money, reallocate funds and see if they can survive.”

    “It’s going to mean a lot of challenges for smaller, less wealthy institutions if the international student population declines and the domestic student population declines,” said Drew’s Link.
    “We all need to work harder and more creatively to think about the value of a degree from a U.S. institution in this moment and how we make higher education more accessible and desirable,” Link said.

    For decades, research has shown that getting a college degree pays: College graduates earn significantly more than those with just a high school diploma. But in addition to higher earnings and better employment prospects, getting a degree is the ticket to social mobility, allowing graduates from diverse backgrounds to climb the economic ladder — an opportunity that is unmatched elsewhere.
    Yet, today’s pressures point to an era when fewer Americans go to college at all, and fewer colleges are in business.
    “Declining international student enrollment is a piece of the larger puzzle undermining the financial health of higher education,” said AAUP’s Wolfson. “What we are going to see is programs shut down, campuses shut down, smaller public or private institutions closing or merging and a curtailment of opportunities for our students.”
    For now, Mitchell said, “colleges and universities are not holding their breath” for a rebound in revenue. “They need to hit the cost side hard.”

    Southwestern University in Georgetown, Texas.
    Courtesy: Southwestern University

    “We are carefully monitoring all of our expenses, but we also know the next few years are going to be tough,” said Laura Trombley, president of Southwestern University in Georgetown, Texas. Only about 7% of the school’s 1,434 students come from overseas, she said, so the impact has been minimal, so far.
    In times of financial stress, the first cuts would be to the facilities budget, Trombley said, followed by under-enrolled academic programs — often in the humanities — and then reducing the number of faculty and staff.
    “You have levers to pull, but you don’t have that many levers,” Trombley said.
    Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube. More

  • in

    This two-step plan can be ‘incredibly helpful’ for your savings, behavioral economist says

    The combination of setting a financial goal and setting regular reminders to make progress toward that goal is a powerful duo, said Katy Milkman, a behavioral economist.
    Automating the savings is generally the best bet since it helps overcome inertia, experts said.

    Xavier Lorenzo | Moment | Getty Images

    Many of us set savings goals. But we don’t always follow through.
    About 90% of Americans set financial goals for 2025, according to a recent NerdWallet survey. As of June, about 37% of the 2,090 adults NerdWallet surveyed weren’t on track to hit their biggest financial goal.

    There’s an easy two-step way to make these milestones easier to reach: Set a goal and then set a reminder to take action, behavioral scientists said.

    “When we set goals — and then we make sure that there are reminders associated with those goals — it can be really incredibly helpful to savings,” said Katy Milkman, a behavioral economist and author of “How to Change: The Science of Getting from Where You Are to Where You Want to Be.”
    For households that take a more manual approach to saving, this might mean setting up a repeating nudge on your calendar to make a deposit to savings, or even asking your bank, financial advisor, romantic partner or roommate for that reminder, Milkman said.
    More from Personal Finance:How to get the best returns on cashAlmost half of Americans don’t have a financial planWhat investors need to know about financial advisor fees
    When possible, automating the actual saving generally yields better results, according to behavioral experts.

    “Your main savings strategy should be to switch from having to remember to save a small amount every month to saving a percentage of your income automatically, any time you receive income,” said Wendy De La Rosa, a behavioral scientist at the University of Pennsylvania.

    Data shows this passive “set it and forget it” approach helps people save more, because it leverages people’s tendency toward inertia, De La Rosa said. Even making small, regular automatic transfers can be impactful, she said.
    She advocates for setting one financial goal at a time to avoid splitting attention across multiple priorities. For example, households can focus on first building an emergency fund, De La Rosa said.

    Give yourself a ‘fresh start’ for savings

    Milkman’s research shows that “fresh starts” are often the best time to set a new financial goal, she said.
    These are moments like the start of a new year that feel like new beginnings, she said.

    “There are moments in our lives when we are more motivated to make a change than on a mundane Wednesday,” Milkman said. “We feel a little bit of a disconnect from who we were before. And that gives us more optimism about what we can achieve,” she said.
    It’s not just New Year’s Day, though: Mondays (the start of a new week), birthdays, holidays or the beginning of a school year can all be fresh starts, Milkman said. More

  • in

    How federal workers can prepare financially under threat of a government shutdown, layoffs

    If you expect a loss in pay, experts say it’s important to assess cash flow first.
    Once you understand where your money is going each month, cut expenses as needed.
    Consider health insurance costs if you lose coverage in a layoff.

    The United States Capitol building is seen in Washington D.C., United States on October 4 , 2023. 
    Yasin Ozturk | Anadolu Agency | Getty Images

    Congress has until midnight on Tuesday to pass a funding bill and avoid a shutdown of the federal government. If lawmakers can’t agree, hundreds of thousands of federal employees could be without a paycheck — or worse.
    While federal workers are typically put on unpaid leave during a shutdown, President Donald Trump has threatened mass firings if a budget deal isn’t reached.

    If your paycheck is at risk, now is the time to plan for delayed or lost income. 
    Government shutdowns have historically been short, with many lasting just a few days. But if you’re living paycheck to paycheck, any pay gap is challenging, especially as everyday costs increase.
    “The last time we had something like this, it wasn’t the entire government, but it was 35 days, and that went up to close to three paychecks for people,” said John Hatton, staff vice president for policy and programs at the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association.  

    Focus on cash flow

    Start with a vigorous accounting of expenses: “Three things you really need to focus on … cash flow, cash flow and cash flow,” said Mary Clements Evans, a certified financial planner and owner of Evans Wealth Strategies in Emmaus, Pennsylvania.
    Many people don’t have an understanding of their monthly expenses beyond the large essentials such as rent or mortgage and car payments, she said. Automatic payments and debit or credit card swipes can also make it harder to gauge discretionary spending. 

    “We’re in a world where we’re disconnected from our spending habits,” Evans said.

    More from Your Money:

    Here’s a look at more stories on how to manage, grow and protect your money for the years ahead.

    Once you have a handle on expenses, plan for reduced income. This may mean determining which savings to tap and adjusting your budget.
    Figuring out where to cut back is easier while you still have a paycheck coming in. 
    “It sounds like that’s a financial equation, but it’s not. It’s often emotional and psychological, because they feel they’re losing their identity and their status,” said Evans, who is also the author of “Emotionally Invested.”
    Reach out to your lenders. Financial institutions may offer payment deferrals, loan modifications and other forms of hardship assistance. For example, some credit unions are preparing to offer zero-interest loans for federal workers whose pay is affected in a shutdown.

    Prepare for possible unemployment

    Andreypopov | Istock | Getty Images

    The Trump administration’s plan for a “reduction in force,” or RIF, in the event of a shutdown is a new wrinkle for federal workers.
    “We are in uncharted territory,” Hatton said.
    During a shutdown, a majority of employees at government agencies funded through the annual appropriations process are typically put on furlough, or unpaid leave, if the agency hasn’t received funding. Those whose work is necessary to protect life or property, or to deliver mandated benefits, are considered essential and required to work, according to the Office of Personnel Management. Employees are promised back pay when the government reopens.
    “This is always a difficult situation for federal employees,” Hatton said, “whether they’re working or furloughed or now, adding this new option of receiving a RIF notice, for possible permanent loss of their employment.”
    It’s unclear how a massive RIF would be carried out under a government shutdown, experts say.
    There are legal requirements for an RIF: Agencies must provide justification for the layoffs, give written notice to employees 60 days before a layoff and offer an appeals process. During a shutdown, only “essential” functions are supposed to be carried out, and experts say it’s uncertain if carrying out mass layoffs would fit that definition.

    To prepare for a possible layoff, federal employees should research unemployment benefits and determine when their health coverage might end.
    Research health insurance costs, too. Workers may be able to extend their federal workplace plan for up to 18 months through the Temporary Continuation of Coverage option — but they still must shoulder the full cost of premiums.
    For now, a more affordable option could be marketplace coverage under the Affordable Care Act.
    “You can go and you can get insurance through them, and that is based on your income,” Evans said.
    However, the enhanced subsidies that have kept premiums low are set to expire at the end of the year, unless Congress acts.
    The subsidies are a key sticking point in the current government funding debate. Democrats say they want to extend them as part of the current budget negotiations, while Republicans say they want to debate the policy only after averting a shutdown.
    SIGN UP: Money 101 is an 8-week learning course on financial freedom, delivered weekly to your inbox. Sign up here. It is also available in Spanish.
    Correction: This story has been revised to reflect that enhanced Affordable Care Act subsidies are set to expire at the end of the year. A previous version misstated how the subsidies would change. More

  • in

    Top Wall Street analysts favor these 3 stocks for their robust growth outlook

    The Nvidia logo is displayed on a building at Nvidia headquarters on Aug. 27, 2025 in Santa Clara, California.
    Justin Sullivan | Getty Images

    Despite macroeconomic uncertainties, several companies are well-positioned to deliver strong returns to investors from rapid technological advancements and artificial intelligence (AI) adoption.
    To pick attractive stocks with strong prospects, investors can track top Wall Street analysts, whose recommendations are based on in-depth research and analysis of a company’s financials and growth drivers.

    Here are three stocks favored by the Street’s top pros, according to TipRanks, a platform that ranks analysts based on their past performance.
    Nvidia
    We start with semiconductor giant Nvidia (NVDA), which has strengthened its dominant position through continued innovation and strategic deals, such as the recently announced $5 billion investment in Intel and massive $100 billion investment in OpenAI.
    Following a conversation with Nvidia’s CFO on the OpenAI deal, Evercore analyst Mark Lipacis reiterated a buy rating on NVDA, saying the chip company is the “AI ecosystem of choice, not just with its CUDA software stack, but also with its connectivity solution, NVLink, which we think is poised to become a de facto standard.”
    The top-rated analyst increased his price target on Nvidia to $225 from $214 and said that Nvidia remains a top pick for Evercore. TipRanks’ AI Analyst has an “outperform” rating on Nvidia stock with a price target of $204.
    Highlighting the key takeaways from his conversation with the company’s CFO, Lipacis said that Nvidia will be the preferred supplier to OpenAI, adding that the ChatGPT platform has underestimated demand for its solution and wants to get ahead of future demand. Nvidia is well-positioned to help OpenAI with this infrastructure buildout.

    Lipacis noted that the deal specifies at least 10 GW (gigawatts) of AI infrastructure, and Nvidia management confirmed that, historically, the company’s total addressable market (TAM) was $30 billion to $40 billion per GW, although it could increase in the future. The analyst increased his 2026 revenue and earnings per share (EPS) estimates by 2% for Nvidia, but thinks that his forecast may be conservative.
    Lipacis ranks No. 53 among more than 10,000 analysts tracked by TipRanks. His ratings have been successful 66% of the time, delivering an average return of 26.5%. See Nvidia ETF Exposure on TipRanks.
    MongoDB
    Next is database management software company MongoDB (MDB). The company recently held a MongoDB.local event in New York City, hosting an Investor Session focused on profitable growth and providing a 3- to 5-year financial framework.
    Following the event, Needham analyst Mike Cikos reiterated a buy rating on MongoDB and increased his price target to $365 from $325. TipRanks’ AI Analyst is also bullish on MDB stock, giving it an “outperform” rating and a price target of $355.
    Cikos said that while investors’ initial reaction to the high-teens revenue growth forecast was underwhelming, he expects both AI and competitive migrations to drive incremental growth for MongoDB.
    The 5-star analyst noted that management plans to continue investing in the business, though at a slower rate than revenue and gross profit growth. MongoDB’s investments will mainly focus on developer awareness, research & development and its sales force.The company has also identified areas for optimization and expects its scale to drive profitable growth through efficiencies.
    Cikos said that following the MongoDB.local event he is “incrementally more positive on MongoDB’s AI positioning,” driven by embeddings, which bridge data and Large Language Models (LLMs), and the continued integration of Voyage’s best-in-class models.
    Cikos ranks No. 581 among more than 10,000 analysts tracked by TipRanks. His ratings have been profitable 59% of the time, delivering an average return of 14.1%. See MongoDB Ownership Structure on TipRanks.

    CrowdStrike

    Cybersecurity company CrowdStrike (CRWD) is this week’s third pick. The cloud-native platform offers security solutions for critical areas of enterprise risk — endpoints and cloud workloads, identity, and data.
    Following CrowdStrike’s recently held Fal.Con 2025 event, RBC Capital analyst Matthew Hedberg reiterated a buy rating on CrowdStrike with a 12-month price target of $510, saying the commentary from management, partners and customers reinforced his bullish long-term thesis. CrowdStrike remains one of RBC’s top cybersecurity ideas, he added. TipRanks’ AI Analyst has a “neutral” rating on CrowdStrike stock with a target price of $543.
    “Overall, we thought the event made a compelling case for the company’s positioning as we enter the agentic era,” said Hedberg.
    The 5-star analyst mainly noted lucrative prospects in agentic security for CrowdStrike and the evolution of its agentic security operations center (SOC). He added that management views the agentic revolution as a huge opportunity (potentially over a 100x), with the rise of more identities and complexity creating new security needs.
    Management sees a total addressable market (TAM) of $300 billion in 2030, up from $140 billion in 2026, with key tailwinds resulting from market consolidation, the evolving threat landscape and technological advancements. Helped by these tailwinds, Hedberg believes CrowdStrike is well-positioned for continued market consolidation as it secures an AI-led transformation.  
    Hedberg noted that CrowdStrike is about halfway through its $10 billion annual recurring revenue (ARR) goal for fiscal 2031. While cloud, the Next-Gen Identity Security offering and the Next-Gen SIEM platform are the key drivers for the current ARR of $4.7 billion, management expects agentic SOC to be the main catalyst for achieving the $10 billion ARR target for fiscal 2031. CrowdStrike expects Agentic Everywhere to be the key driver for the newly introduced $20 billion ARR target for fiscal 2036.
    Hedberg ranks No. 37 among more than 10,000 analysts tracked by TipRanks. His ratings have been successful 70% of the time, delivering an average return of 21.6%. See CrowdStrike Insider Trading Activity on TipRanks. More

  • in

    Trump is wielding the power of the state to back critical mineral companies. These are the possible next targets

    The Pentagon’s equity stake in rare earth miner MP Materials has investors wondering where the Trump administration might invest next.
    The federal government needs to invest in additional miners to diversify the rare-earth supply chain, Energy Fuels CEO Mark Chalmers said.
    The MP deal could serve as a blueprint for interventions in other critical mineral markets like lithium, executives, analysts and lobbyists say.

    The Trump administration needs to strike multiple deals with U.S. miners to secure the nation’s supply chain against China, said Mark Chalmers, CEO of Energy Fuels, a miner focused on uranium and rare earth minerals.
    The Pentagon decision to take an equity stake in MP Materials, the largest U.S. rare earth miner, in July and support the company with a price floor surprised many in the industry, Chalmers told CNBC.

    But it was a necessary step that the White House should now follow with more deals to diversify the U.S. supply chain and reduce the risk that would come with backing a single national champion, the CEO said.
    “One company doesn’t fix it,” Chalmers said of the MP Materials deal. “You have to have multiple deals to ensure that you don’t just have the company risk, because all companies aren’t going to deliver.”
    The White House is “not ruling out other deals with equity stakes or price floors as we did with MP Materials, but that doesn’t mean every initiative we take would be in the shape of the MP deal,” a Trump administration official told CNBC.
    Rare earths are key inputs in weapons platforms such as the F-35 warplane as well as consumer products like electric vehicles and smartphones. The U.S. is almost entirely dependent on China, which supplied 70% of rare earth imports in 2023, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. 
    China has manipulated the market by suppressing prices to drive Western competition from the market, said Ryan Castilloux, founder of Adamas Intelligence, a critical mineral market research firm. The MP deal demonstrated that the U.S. is willing to break with free market ideals and push back against China by mimicking its model of strategic capitalism when necessary, Castilloux said.

    “We’ve seen just how disadvantaged the free market view is versus a long term, industrial policy driven market — and something needed to give,” Castilloux, an expert on critical minerals, told CNBC.
    Possible rare earth targets
    Energy Fuels’ stock has surged nearly 200% since the MP deal on July 10, as investors speculate that it could be a deal target for the Trump administration. Critical mineral miner NioCorp Developments is also up almost 200%, Ramaco Resources has gained 140%, and USA Rare Earth is up more than 70%.
    MP Materials will likely need more heavy rare earths as it develops a second facility to make magnets under the Defense Department deal, Castilloux said. Heavy rare earths are needed to produce magnets that can withstand high temperatures in EV motors and defense industry applications, he said.

    Headquartered in Denver, Energy Fuels is the largest uranium miner in the U.S. and is forming a rare earth operation through mines it has acquired around the world. Its operation will produce heavy rare earths, Chalmers said.
    Energy Fuels is focused on “providing a product that is attractive to the U.S government” and complements the strengths of MP Materials, the CEO said.
    “The government cannot bet on one horse — it just doesn’t make sense,” Chalmers said. “We spend a lot of time in D.C. making sure they understand the merits of our strategy,” he said.
    Trump eyes lithium
    Other critical minerals like lithium, cobalt and graphite are ripe for federal investment to smooth out volatile price fluctuations that undermine U.S. miners, said Rich Nolan, CEO of the National Mining Association. Those minerals are all used in batteries, among other applications.
    The Trump administration has proposed an equity stake in Lithium Americas, as the Canadian company renegotiates the terms of a $2.2 billion loan from the Department of Energy for its Thacker Pass mine in northern Nevada. The mine is expected to become one of the largest sources of lithium in North America, with the first phase of the project scheduled to start operations in late 2027.
    Lithium Americas stock surged more than 90% this week on news of the potential government stake.
    Albemarle CEO Kent Masters told CNBC that something “in the ballpark” of the MP deal could apply to the lithium sector. Albemarle, headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, is one of the largest lithium producers in the world.
    “What you want to do is move the market such that private industry can invest behind it,” Masters told CNBC in July, pointing to Apple’s offtake agreement with MP just days after the Defense Department deal.

    Miners seek price floors
    While it might take a government equity stake to move the market in some cases, the price floor established by the Pentagon in the MP deal is the “critical part” that allows private industry to invest and build out the supply chain, Masters said.
    Price support from the federal government “sends a true market signal that these investments are long term, that they are here to stay,” the National Mining Association’s Nolan said.
    Under the MP deal, the Pentagon set a price floor of $110 per kilogram for neodymium-praseodymium oxide, or NdPr, a key input in rare-earth magnets. The government pays MP the difference when the market price is below $110 but in turn takes 30% of the upside when the price is above $110.
    The price of NdPr surged 40% in the wake of the MP deal, Castilloux said.
    “It serves as a blueprint for any market where suppressed pricing is slanting the competitive playing field against the U.S. and its allies,” the analyst said of the price floor. The deal signals that “there is a way to break free of China’s artificially suppressed pricing,” he said. More

  • in

    BYD bids Warren Buffett’s Berkshire an unfazed farewell: Selling is ‘normal’

    Buffett Watch

    Berkshire Hathaway Portfolio Tracker

    (This is the Warren Buffett Watch newsletter, news and analysis on all things Warren Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway. You can sign up here to receive it every Friday evening in your inbox.)
    Hours after we first reported last week that Berkshire sold off the remainder of its stake in BYD earlier this year, the Chinese electric vehicle maker confirmed the news and thanked Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger for believing in the company.

    In a post on the Chinese social media site Weibo, BYD public relations executive Li Yunfei wrote, as translated by Google:

    “In August 2022, Berkshire began gradually reducing its holdings of company shares purchased in 2008, and by last June, its stake had fallen below 5%…Investing in stocks involves both buying and selling, which is completely normal…We are grateful for Charlie Munger’s and Warren Buffett’s recognition of BYD, as well as for the investment, support, and companionship over the past 17 years…Praise to all long-term believers!”

    BYD Dolphin Surf electric cars are parked infront of the venue where BYD carmaker holds a vehicle presentation event in Berlin, Germany May 21, 2025.
    Annegret Hilse | Reuters

    BYD Executive Vice President Stella Li, appearing on CNBC Europe’s Access Middle East this week, echoed the Weibo post, saying Buffett and Munger “loved” BYD and its management, but “they are investors, so naturally buying and selling is their business, so it’s not because they don’t like us.”

    And Reuters quotes a special adviser to BYD, Alfredo Altavilla, as saying that Buffett “made a profit of 20 times the capital he invested. He did very well to do what he did.”
    “We’ve been extremely glad to have had Buffett (as an investor), but the fact that he monetised [UK spelling] his position is exactly what Berkshire Hathaway does for a living: buying, earning and selling.”
    Investors around the world, however, were not as accepting.

    BYD shares fell more than 6% this week in Hong Kong.

    Arrows pointing outwards

    Arrows pointing outwards

     Second Japanese stake tops 10%

    While Berkshire is closing out its Chinese investment, it continues to expand its holdings of Japanese “trading house” stocks.
    This week, Mitsui said in a news release that it was “informed” by Berkshire that “they now hold 10% or more of the voting rights in Mitsui as a result of an additional acquisition of our shares.”
    It did not, however, know the exact number of shares Berkshire now owns.
    In a March 17 disclosure, Berkshire reporting holding a 9.8% stake of 285,401,400 Mitsui shares. They would be valued at around $7.3 billion at today’s close.
    Late last month, a Mitsui official told Reuters Berkshire raised its stake but declined to give a percentage. 
    At the same time, Mitsubishi said in a regulatory filing that Berkshire’s stake had increased to 10.2% from 9.7%.
    We haven’t heard anything about Berkshire’s three other Japanese holdings, Itochu, Marubeni, and Sumitomo, but it would not be a surprise to learn those stakes have also gone above 10%.

    BUFFETT AROUND THE INTERNET

    Some links may require a subscription:

    HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE ARCHIVE
    Why Berkshire created Class B shares (1996)

    Leading up to the Berkshire board’s vote on adding Class B shares, Warren Buffett explains the thinking behind the move.

    BERKSHIRE STOCK WATCH

    Four weeks

    Arrows pointing outwards

    Twelve months

    Arrows pointing outwards

    BERKSHIRE’S TOP STOCK HOLDINGS – Sep. 26, 2025

    Arrows pointing outwards

    Berkshire’s top holdings of disclosed publicly traded stocks in the U.S. and Japan, by market value, based on today’s closing prices.
    Holdings are as of June 30, 2025 as reported in Berkshire Hathaway’s 13F filing on August 14, 2025, except for:

    The full list of holdings and current market values is available from CNBC.com’s Berkshire Hathaway Portfolio Tracker.

    QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS

    Please send any questions or comments about the newsletter to me at [email protected]. (Sorry, but we don’t forward questions or comments to Buffett himself.)
    If you aren’t already subscribed to this newsletter, you can sign up here.
    Also, Buffett’s annual letters to shareholders are highly recommended reading. There are collected here on Berkshire’s website.
    — Alex Crippen, Editor, Warren Buffett Watch More

  • in

    Anson Funds calls for Clear Channel Outdoor’s sale. Here’s why the timing may finally be right

    A Clear Channel Outdoor digital billboard displays a temperature of 102 degrees at 5:18 p.m. on northbound I-35 in Dallas, Texas, on Wednesday, July 12, 2023.
    Irwin Thompson | The Dallas Morning News via AP

    Company: Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings (CCO)
    Business: Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings is an outdoor advertising company that provides clients with advertising through billboards, street furniture displays, transit displays and other out-of-home advertising displays. The company operates entirely within the United States, with assets including printed and digital billboards, transit displays, including airports, street furniture and wallscapes and other spectaculars. 
    Stock Market Value: $755.45 million ($1.52 per share) 

    Stock chart icon

    Clear Channel Outdoor shares year to date

    Activist: Anson Funds

    Ownership: 3.65% 
    Average Cost: n/a 
    Activist Commentary: Anson Funds is a multistrategy fund founded in 2007 by Moez Kassam and has over $2 billion in assets. While not historically activists, on Oct. 3, 2023, Anson hired Sagar Gupta, former senior analyst and head of TMT investing at Legion Partners, to build out their activism strategy. 
    What’s happening
    On Sept. 22, Anson Funds announced that they are calling for a sale of Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings. 
    Behind the scenes
    Clear Channel Outdoor is one of the largest out-of-home advertising companies that offers a variety of advertising services, including through billboards, street furniture displays, transit displays, and airport displays. In the U.S., they are one of the three big companies in this sector, with Lamar Advertising and Outfront Media numbers one and two, respectively.

    Historically, the challenges for CCO have centered around the company’s two business lines – Americas and Europe, each with very different business models and valuations. The European business worked on fixed limited-term contracts with municipalities, which were re-bided at maturity. Because of this, the European business traded around 8x EBITDA multiple, while the U.S., largely comprised of owned billboards, traded closer 13 – 15x EBITDA.
    These problems prompted Legion Partners to launch an activist campaign at CCO in May 2023, urging the company to consider a broad strategic review process, including divesting non-U.S. assets or a sale of the entire company. Legion also highlighted CCO’s potential value proposition through its transition to digital billboards, which would allow each billboard to generate about four times more revenue and six to 10 times more EBITDA. Ultimately, they settled for a board seat for Legion co-founder Ted White, who still serves as a director today. Since then, CCO has executed a series of divestures, including selling its European business to Bauer Media Group, its Latin America business to Global Vía Públic, and, just two weeks ago, its Spain business to Atresmedia. These moves have transformed CCO into a U.S. pureplay and allowed it to start paying down its debt. However, despite this successful activist catalyst, CCO is yet to achieve the rerating some expected – currently, CCO trades at approximately 13-14 times EBITDA, versus peers Lamar and Outfront at 16-18 times. As a result, the stock is down 26.56% since Legion filed its 13D and over 90% from its IPO price.
    On Sept. 22, Anson Funds joined the party, announcing that they are calling for a sale of the company. While this is a new campaign for Anson, this is not the beginning of their investment story. Sagar Gupta, who runs Anson’s activism strategy, was at Legion Partners when they launched their campaign, and, perhaps not coincidentally, CCO has appeared in Anson’s 13F holdings every quarter since Gupta joined the fund, now with a 3.65% position as of their most recent filing. So, Anson’s call for a sale of the company is not a short-term, opportunistic campaign, but a decision made after years of analysis and working amicably with the company and at a time when it has become most feasible.
    The company is now a U.S. pureplay, making it more focused and more valuable from a multiple perspective and easier to acquire from a regulatory perspective. Possible acquirers include JCDecaux and Lamar.
    In fact, JCDecaux terminated an agreement to buy CCO’s Spain assets after facing restrictive demands from Spanish regulators. More specifically, JCDecaux maintains major exposure in virtually every OOH market outside the U.S. and has been rumored to be interested in the company.
    As for Lamar, it has a history of acquiring CCO’s assets, including a $458.5 million transaction in 2016, and has publicly expressed potential interest in additional transactions. In addition, Blackstone’s recent acquisition of New Tradition at 18x EBITDA, Berkshire Hathaway’s new position in Lamar, and Ares Management’s 8% position in CCO, all underscore the private equity appetite for the OOH industry. 
    Before coming to a decision like this, it is important to see what the standalone alternative looks like and why a sale may be more compelling for shareholders. To really properly restructure this business in the public market it would certainly require the time and risk of reconstituting the board and likely many management changes. Even with that, the company would still carry approximately $5 billion of long-term debt making it difficult to attract capital.
    Additionally, CCO’s promising digital transformation has been very slow. Since Legion’s campaign, digital billboards have only grown to 5% of the portfolio, though they already count for over a third of CCO’s revenue. While this underscores the huge value opportunity with digital conversion, it requires approvals of individual municipalities, significantly slowing the speed at which CCO can roll out digital ads, and not ideal for a public company that reports quarterly progress. As a result, after years of analysis and support, Anson has concluded that a sale offers the best risk adjusted path forward, a position we imagine Legion and other shareholders likely share.
    Ken Squire is the founder and president of 13D Monitor, an institutional research service on shareholder activism, and the founder and portfolio manager of the 13D Activist Fund, a mutual fund that invests in a portfolio of activist 13D investments. More