More stories

  • in

    Average 401(k), IRA balances hit record highs amid 2025’s market gains

    Retirement account balances hit fresh highs in the third quarter of 2025 amid an upswing in the stock market, according to a new report by Fidelity.
    Even heading into a period of increased economic uncertainty, savers maintained their contribution rate, Fidelity also found.

    Insta_photos | Istock | Getty Images

    Retirement account balances, which sank at the start of 2025 amid wild market swings, hit record highs in the third quarter, according to the latest data from Fidelity Investments, the nation’s largest provider of 401(k) savings plans.
    The average 401(k) balance jumped 9% from a year ago to $144,400, an all-time high, Fidelity found.

    The average individual retirement account balance also rose 7% year over year to $137,902.

    Fidelity’s report showed increased interest in Roth 401(k)s and IRAs, particularly among younger savers.
    Like a traditional 401(k), Roth 401(k)s let you contribute up to $24,500, which is the new, higher limit for 2026. But a key difference is that contributions to a Roth 401(k) are taxed upfront so withdrawals in retirement are tax-free.
    Roth 401(k) plans are similar to better-known Roth IRAs although the contribution limits vary. With a Roth IRA, savers under the age of 50 can make after-tax contributions up to $7,500 a year, as of 2026, and then take tax-free withdrawals in retirement.
    “Retirement is about taking a long-term view, and the growing interest in Roth products shows that investors recognize their potential for tax advantages and long-term growth,” Robert Mascialino, president of wealth at Fidelity Investments, said in a statement.

    While other research points to retirement saving shortfalls across generations, Fidelity’s “numbers tell a different story,” said Mike Shamrell, Fidelity’s vice president of thought leadership. “We’re seeing a lot of positive behaviors among younger workers, especially Gen Z.”

    Number of 401(k), IRA millionaires hit all-time highs

    The gains in account balances also helped boost the number of 401(k) millionaires to a fresh high. 
    The number of 401(k) accounts with a balance of $1 million or more jumped to 654,000 as of Sept. 30, up 10% from the second quarter, according to Fidelity.
    The number of IRA-created millionaires also increased by 11.5% from the previous quarter to a record 559,181.

    More from Fixed Income Strategies:

    Stories for investors who are retired or are approaching retirement, and are interested in creating and managing a steady stream of income:

    Positive savings behaviors were key to better outcomes, Shamrell said.
    The majority of retirement savers continued to make contributions, even during periods of market turbulence. Although there have been concerns about the economy, “the good news is, as of now, it has not turned into any sort of pullback on their retirement savings efforts,” Shamrell said.
    The average 401(k) contribution rate, including employer and employee contributions, held steady at 14.2%, Fidelity found, just shy of their suggested savings rate of 15%.

    A great stretch for the major indexes also helped.
    U.S. markets came under pressure after the White House first announced country-specific tariffs on April 2, causing some of the worst trading days for the S&P 500 since the early days of the Covid pandemic.
    However, markets rebounded in the second and third quarter. Through Sept. 30, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was 9% for the year, the S&P 500 was higher by 14% and the Nasdaq Composite was up 17%.  More

  • in

    TIAA CEO: Concerns about ‘AI bubble’ shouldn’t be the main focus of retirement investors

    Investors saving for retirement should focus on their income needs, says TIAA CEO. 
    TIAA manages $1.4 trillion in assets for more than 5 million people. 
    Changes in federal law have made it easier for plan sponsors to add annuities, or insurance products, to retirement plans.

    Thasunda Brown Duckett

    Fears of an AI stock bubble have many investors watching — and some worrying — about its impact on their retirement accounts. 
    TIAA CEO Thasunda Brown Duckett, who heads one of the nation’s largest retirement plan providers, says that shouldn’t be retail investors’ greatest concern.

    When eyeing the AI-driven market gains, “I think the real question is not knowing if it’s going to burst or boom. It’s about making sure you’ll be prepared for retirement,” Brown Duckett said in an interview on the sidelines of TIAA’s FutureWise conference in Washington, DC, earlier this week.  
    The focus of investors saving for retirement should be on building a diversified portfolio that includes a guaranteed income stream, she said. 

    ‘Income has to be the outcome,’ for retirement savings
    “It’s not about timing the market. It’s about how much time you put in the market,” she said. “And as we think about that diversification, how do we ensure that there’s income within it? Income has to be the outcome.” 
    That income, she says, could come from annuities or insurance products that provide regular payments for retirement income. 
    More than one-third (35%) of 225 decision makers at U.S. defined contribution plans said they will prioritize adding retirement income solutions to their offering in the next 12 months, according to a new survey by Mercer, a global HR and benefits consulting firm. Defined contribution plans include employer-sponsored retirement plans, like 401(k)s and 403(b)s.

    TIAA is a major provider of 403(b) plans, annuities, and retirement income products, particularly for the nonprofit sector, including colleges and universities and health care systems. Last year, TIAA entered the 401(k) market, offering lifetime income products in target-date funds. Altogether, the firm manages over $1.4 trillion in assets for more than 5 million people. 

    “We have to make sure that the everyday investor in their retirement does not get to a position that they were too far on the risk curve, that they did not have the counterbalance, which is income,” Brown Duckett said, when asked how investors should react to volatility. 
    Since 2019, federal laws have made it easier to offer annuities in 401(k) plans. TIAA views this as an opportunity to sell its lifetime income products to a much broader share of the $12.5 trillion defined contribution plan market.
    However, research shows most everyday investors don’t understand annuities and retirement income products. While 28% of financial professionals think clients understand annuities “very well,” only 14% of clients agree, according to a 2025 study by the Alliance for Lifetime Income by LIMRA, a non-profit consumer education organization.

    Balancing alternative assets risk in retirement plans

    Now, the White House is endorsing the inclusion of private credit, private equity, real estate, and other alternative investments in 401(k) plans, too, which can entail greater risk than stocks and bonds – and annuities.

    More from Your Money:

    Here’s a look at more stories on how to manage, grow and protect your money for the years ahead.

    Before adding those private assets to a workplace retirement plan, Brown Duckett said this question should be answered first: “How do we ensure that we’re educating people along the way so that we don’t get over-excited when you’re in a bull market, and then when that bear hits, you see a real decline that you didn’t anticipate in your retirement plan?” 
    “I do think alternatives can be a good thing,” she added, “but I do think it has to be balanced with lifetime income to offset it, because it is riskier.”
    Brown Duckett says investors need income in their retirement portfolios so they won’t run out of money, regardless of how long they live or how much markets fluctuate.
    SIGN UP: Money 101 is an 8-week learning course on financial freedom, delivered weekly to your inbox. Sign up here. It is also available in Spanish. More

  • in

    Education Department restructuring plan doesn’t involve student debt. Still, experts are worried

    The new restructuring at the Education Department doesn’t involve the federal student loan portfolio, for now. But the instability at the agency could still harm borrowers, experts said.
    At the same time, Trump officials are exploring options to sell some of its education debt to the private market.

    US Secretary of Education Linda McMahon attends the International Women of Courage Awards Ceremony at the State Department in Washington, DC, on April 1, 2025.
    Brendan Smialowski | Afp | Getty Images

    When the U.S. Department of Education announced this week that it would transfer much of its programs to other agencies, it didn’t appear that the country’s federal student loan portfolio would be impacted.
    However, financial aid experts and consumer advocates are still worried for borrowers.

    More than 40 million Americans hold student loans, and the outstanding debt exceeds $1.6 trillion. 
    “What is concerning is the destabilization of the Department of Education and Federal Student Aid at the very moment when consistent, technically skilled oversight is most needed,” said Carolina Rodriguez, director of the Education Debt Consumer Assistance Program in New York.
    The major overhaul of the agency is occurring at an especially challenging time for the federal student loan system. More than 5 million people are in default on their education debt, and President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act eliminates several long-standing affordable repayment plans and relief options.
    “Student loan eligibility and repayment involve multiple systems working together, and institutions need that process to be seamless, current and accurate,” said Melanie Storey, president and CEO of the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators. “As the delivery of other programs moves to other agencies, these dependencies must be carefully considered.”
    On Tuesday, Trump administration officials said they had signed agreements with four federal agencies, including the departments of Labor and Health and Human Services, to start managing programs currently under the Education Department.

    Read more CNBC personal finance coverage

    The move is part of Trump’s directive to dismantle the agency, experts said. Education Secretary Linda McMahon has argued that the recent government shutdown proved that the department is not needed.
    Earlier this year, the Trump administration laid off nearly half of the Education Department’s staffers.
    “They are attempting to hollow out the U.S. Department of Education, leaving behind a shell of the original organization,” said higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz.

    Privatization concerns

    The Trump administration’s goal of hobbling the Education Department will be difficult while the agency still oversees the massive federal student loan portfolio, experts say. But it may be trying to offload the debt.
    The new restructuring at the Education Department doesn’t involve the loans, but Trump officials are exploring options to sell some of the debt to the private market, Politico reported in October.

    Student loan borrowers have faced even more problems in the private market than with the government, consumer advocates said. When private companies played a bigger role in federal student lending in the past under the Federal Family Education Loan, of FFEL, program, Rodriguez said, “borrowers saw their debt balloon with no end in sight due to loan mismanagement.”
    Any major loan transfer “will also result in errors that could harm borrowers and push relief further out of reach,” said Aissa Canchola Banez, the policy director at Protect Borrowers.
    Currently, private lenders account for 8% of all student loans but are the subject of more than 40% of student debt complaints to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, lawmakers recently wrote in a letter to Trump officials. More

  • in

    It’s looking like a ‘K-shaped’ holiday season, reports show

    Some shoppers plan to spend big this holiday season — even if it means racking up more credit card debt.
    “It’s very much a two-track economy, as we know, and credit cards are a great example of that,” says Ted Rossman, Bankrate’s senior industry analyst.

    Americans tend to overspend during the holiday shopping season, and this year will be no different, according to some forecasts.
    Despite concerns about the economy, President Donald Trump’s latest wave of tariff hikes and persistent inflation, holiday spending between November and December is expected to rise 3.7% to 4.2% and surpass $1 trillion for the first time, according to the National Retail Federation.

    “American consumers may be cautious in sentiment, yet remain fundamentally strong and continue to drive U.S. economic activity,” Matthew Shay, NRF’s president and CEO, said in a statement.
    However, other reports show that growing concerns about trade uncertainty and increased prices will weigh on household budgets.

    More from Your Money:

    Here’s a look at more stories on how to manage, grow and protect your money for the years ahead.

    A separate holiday retail survey by Deloitte found that holiday shoppers plan to pullback. Consumers expect to spend, on average, $1,595 this year as they brace for higher prices, down 10% from last year.
    Another PWC report found that holiday shopping trends are a lot less predictable this year, but overall, consumers expect to spend about 5% less on holiday gifts, travel and entertainment compared with the year-ago season.

    A growing divide

    According to TransUnion’s newly released consumer pulse study, based on a survey of 3,000 adults last month, there’s a growing divide: 57% of Americans expect to spend the same or more this year compared with last year, while roughly 43% plan to spend less.

    Holiday shoppers also said they expect to rely more heavily on credit cards to make their purchases this season, with 42% saying it’s their preferred payment method — up from 38% last year, TransUnion found.

    In an increasingly “K”-shaped economy, credit card users are roughly split between higher-income consumers who don’t carry a balance and use their cards to rack up reward points and lower-income consumers who are “probably going to make purchases on credit cards because they don’t have the cash,” according to Charlie Wise, TransUnion’s senior vice president of global research and consulting.
    Roughly 175 million consumers have credit cards. While some pay off the balance each month, about 60% of credit card users have revolving debt, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. 
    “It’s very much a two-track economy, as we know, and credit cards are a great example of that,” said Ted Rossman, senior industry analyst at Bankrate.
    Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube. More

  • in

    Bond ETFs are gaining investor attention. What to know before you buy

    ETF Strategist

    ETF Street
    ETF Strategist

    Fixed-income ETFs are becoming more popular than their mutual fund counterparts.
    Bond ETFs pulled in almost $344 billion through Oct. 31 this year, compared with $138 billion going into fixed income mutual funds in the same time, according to Morningstar Direct.
    There are now more actively managed bond ETFs than there are passively managed funds.

    Momo Productions | Digitalvision | Getty Images

    If you’re thinking about putting money into bond exchange traded funds (ETFs) rather than mutual funds, you’re not alone.
    Fixed-income ETFs have pulled in nearly $344 billion through Oct. 31 this year, compared with $138 billion going into fixed income mutual funds, according to Morningstar Direct. It’s part of the larger trend of investors preferring ETFs: In October alone, about $74 billion flowed out of mutual funds, while ETFs attracted $166 billion.

    And while ETFs have some advantages over mutual funds, and bonds are viewed as safer investments than stocks, experts say it’s important to know what you’re buying.
    “You have to remember the role of bonds in a portfolio,” said Dan Sotiroff, senior analyst for passive strategies research at Morningstar. “It’s usually to serve as a ballast — and how big of one is something you have to sort out on your own or with your advisor.”
    ‘Legitimate edge’
    Both mutual funds and ETFs let you invest in a fund that holds a mix of underlying investments. The advantages of ETFs range from lower costs to tax efficiency to their trading all day in the open market. (Mutual funds are only priced once a day, after the markets close at 4 p.m. Eastern Time.)
    One reason for assets flowing to bond ETFs is simply that more have been launched in recent years, especially those that are actively managed — meaning professionals are choosing which bonds to invest in — which previously was the sole province of bond mutual funds. In contrast, passively-managed ETFs track an index, and their performance mimics that benchmark, for better or worse.
    “Active management has a legitimate edge,” Sotiroff said. Managers there “can bring something different to the equation and have a shot at outperforming their benchmark.” 

    More from ETF Strategist:

    Here’s a look at other stories offering insight on ETFs for investors.

    The number of actively managed bond ETFs (511) has surpassed the number of passive bond ETFs (393), according to Morningstar.
    The active funds come with higher expense ratios — the yearly fees paid by investors, expressed as a percentage of the fund’s total assets. Investors pay an average of 0.35% for actively managed bond ETFs, versus 0.10% for passively managed bond funds.
    Know what bonds you’re buying
    Also remember that because bonds pay interest, those ETFs distribute monthly payments to investors, who face taxes on that income if the ETFs are held in a taxable brokerage account. If they are in an individual retirement account or 401(k) account, any growth is tax-deferred and then subject to ordinary income tax rates when money is withdrawn after age 59½. If they’re held in a Roth IRA account, withdrawals are tax-free.
    And whether you consider passive or active bond ETFs, it’s important to consider the type of bonds you’re investing in, experts say. For example, U.S. Treasurys and corporate bonds with solid credit ratings are considered investment-grade, meaning that there’s less risk of default.
    “The correlation with stocks is really low and that’s important to keep in mind” when seeking to diversify, Sotiroff said.

    Investment-grade bonds tend to generate less income than riskier bonds, while high-yield corporate bonds with lower investment ratings may offer higher yields but come with a greater chance of default.
    If you are relying on bonds for income in retirement, trying to squeeze too much income out of your bond portfolio could end up backfiring.
    Bond ETFs “are basically funding our clients’ living expenses, so we need to be liquid and high quality,” said certified financial planner Tim Videnka, chief investment officer and principal with Forza Wealth Management in Sarasota, Florida.
    Bonds lose money, too
    But as with all investments, bonds can lose money, too, Videnka said.
    In 2022, as the Federal Reserve began raising its benchmark interest rate to fight high inflation, bond prices slumped (prices move inversely to yield), and the year ended as the worst ever bonds, with major bond indexes posting large losses.
    The year 2022 “showed you can lose money in the bond market,” said Videnka. “People can sometimes forget what can happen when there’s real fear.”
    One reason bond prices fall when rates rise is because newly-issued debt comes with higher interest rates, making existing bonds with lower rates less valuable — pushing down their price.
    Although the Federal Reserve lowered its benchmark interest rate — the federal funds rate — in October for the second time this year, it remains far higher than was the case for years before the Fed started raising rates in 2022. The fed funds rate is the rate that commercial banks charge one another for overnight borrowings to meet reserve requirements, and it ripples through the economy, affecting the rate charged for mortgages, auto loans and credit card debt as well as the interest rate on bonds and savings accounts.
    “If you go back 15 years ago, after the [2008-2009] financial crisis, we were in a 0% rate environment and then Covid hit and we had another 0% rate environment,” Sotiroff said.
    “Now you actually have [positive] interest rates … you have some returns that make bond ETFs attractive,” he said. More

  • in

    Trump administration takes further steps to dismantle Department of Education

    The Trump administration announced on Tuesday that it will transfer much of the U.S. Department of Education’s programs to other agencies.
    Currently, the agency oversees the country’s $1.6 trillion federal student loan portfolio, provides funding to low-income students and enforces civil rights in classrooms across the country.

    U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon smiles during the signing event for an executive order to shut down the Department of Education next to U.S. President Donald Trump, in the East Room at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., March 20, 2025. 
    Carlos Barria | Reuters

    The Trump administration says it will transfer much of the U.S. Department of Education’s programs to other agencies, a move experts say is part of President Donald Trump’s directive to dismantle the agency.
    During a press call with reporters on Tuesday, a senior administration official said the administration had signed agreements with four other federal agencies, including the U.S. Department of Labor and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, to begin managing programs currently under the Education Department.

    Under the new agreements, the Labor Department will administer more federal K-12 initiatives, and the State Department will assume additional tasks related to international education and the Fulbright programs, according to the Education Department.
    Trump signed an executive order in March aimed at closing the Education Department, which oversees the country’s $1.6 trillion federal student loan portfolio, provides funding to low-income students and enforces civil rights in classrooms across the country.
    Only Congress can unilaterally eliminate the Education Department. But the Trump administration may be trying to use a workaround by contracting with other agencies to perform the department’s tasks.
    “They are attempting to hollow out the U.S. Department of Education, leaving behind a shell of the original organization,” said higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz.
    Earlier this year, the Trump administration laid off nearly half of the Education Department’s staffers.

    “We’ll peel back the layers of federal bureaucracy by partnering with agencies that are better suited to manage programs,” Education Department Secretary Linda McMahon wrote in a recent op-ed in USA Today.
    The government shutdown “underlined just how little the Department of Education will be missed,” McMahon said.
    Tuesday’s announcement did not include information on the future of the government’s student loan portfolio. However, administration officials are exploring options to sell some of the debt to the private market, Politico reported in October.
    Former President Jimmy Carter established the current-day Education Department in 1979. Since then, the department has faced other existential threats, with former President Ronald Reagan calling for its end and Trump, during his first term, attempting to merge it with the Labor Department. More

  • in

    Some retirees face a ‘survivor’s penalty’ after a spouse dies — here’s how to avoid it

    You could face unexpectedly higher taxes after a spouse dies, but there are ways to reduce the burden, financial advisors say.
    The “survivor’s penalty” can happen when you shift from married filing jointly to single filer for tax purposes.
    Some survivors see higher taxes due to different brackets, a smaller standard deduction and lower thresholds for other tax breaks.

    D-keine | E+ | Getty Images

    Losing a spouse can be devastating, and survivors often face a costly surprise — higher future taxes. But couples can plan ahead to reduce the burden, experts say.
    The issue, known as the “survivor’s penalty,” happens when shifting from married filing jointly to single filer, which can lead to higher tax rates, depending on the couple. Single filers have less generous tax brackets, a smaller standard deduction and lower thresholds for other tax breaks.

    It’s one of the “most overlooked and financially damaging tax events,” said certified financial planner Gregory Furer, CEO and founder of Beratung Advisors in Pittsburgh. “And it often appears at the worst possible time.” 

    More from Financial Advisor Playbook:

    Here’s a look at other stories affecting the financial advisor business.

    The survivor’s penalty can impact heterosexual couples who typically have different life expectancies, which may require multi-year tax planning, financial experts say.
    In 2023, there was more than a five-year life expectancy gap between the sexes, according to the latest data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2023, the life expectancy was 81.1 years for females and 75.8 years for males.
    If you inherit an individual retirement account from a deceased spouse, you could have larger required minimum distributions, or RMDs, at the higher tax brackets for single filers, according to Furer.
    This can increase federal income taxes, boost Medicare Part B and Part D premiums, and raise Social Security taxes, among other issues. “It is a tax trap that hits widows and widowers at a deeply vulnerable time,” he said.

    Surviving spouse could lose ‘flexibility’

    The surviving spouse could pay higher taxes on Roth individual retirement account conversions, which some investors use for legacy planning, experts say. The strategy incurs upfront levies but can kickstart tax-free growth for heirs.
    “Your flexibility goes down,” said CFP Edward Jastrem, chief planning officer at Heritage Financial Services in Westwood, Massachusetts.

    Survivors could also pay more for large withdrawals from pretax accounts. For example, let’s say you need cash to purchase another home. If you withdraw $300,000 from a pretax IRA, your taxes could be higher as a single filer, Jastrem said.
    Plus, higher income can trigger additional tax consequences more quickly for single filers, he said. You could pay the so-called net investment income tax sooner, which applies to capital gains, interest, dividends, rents, and more. You could also lose eligibility for certain tax breaks.  

    How to reduce the survivor’s penalty

    Typically, “proactive planning” happens five to 10 years before retirement, when there is still time to “shape future tax outcomes,” Furer of Beratung Advisors said.
    For example, some couples may consider “strategic Roth conversions” to reduce pretax retirement balances and the survivor’s future RMDs, he said.
    Of course, you’ll need to run multi-year projections to see when you’ll pay the least amount of tax on the converted balance.
    You also need to plan for retirement income, such as when to take Social Security, and withdrawals from pensions and taxable investment accounts, which can help “soften the impact on the surviving spouse,” Furer said. More

  • in

    New Social Security scam uses ‘high pressure’ scare tactics. What to watch for

    A new scheme seeks to convince individuals that their Social Security numbers may be suspended due to criminal activities, the Office of the Inspector General for the Social Security Administration said in a recent warning.
    Consumers reported losing more than $12.5 billion to fraud in 2024, according to the Federal Trade Commission.
    Adults ages 60 and over are most likely to report large money losses from scams.

    Halfpoint Images | Moment | Getty Images

    A new “high pressure” scam seeks to convince individuals that their Social Security numbers may be suspended due to criminal activities, according to a new warning.
    “Be aware! It’s a scam!” the Office of the Inspector General for the Social Security Administration said in a recent alert.

    The scheme involves emails sent with the subject line, “Alert: Social Security Account Issues Detected.” An attachment with fake letterhead purporting to represent the SSA OIG warns recipients that their Social Security number may be suspended within 24 hours and that their case may be referred for criminal prosecution.
    The schemes typically use scare tactics to dupe victims into handing over their money, such as flagging suspicious activity on accounts, claiming personal information is being used to commit crimes, or alleging online accounts or other personal devices have been hacked.

    Read more CNBC personal finance coverage

    How baby boomers can close a retirement savings gap
    After a layoff, don’t forget about your 401(k) — it’s ‘one of your biggest assets,’ CFP says
    IRS announces 2026 401(k) contribution limits, raises savings cap
    IRS unveils 2026 IRA contribution limits, raises savings cap
    IRS announces 401(k) catch-up contributions for 2026, raises cap
    IRS unveils Roth IRA income limits for 2026
    What the Visa, MasterCard settlement means for your rewards credit card
    Where SNAP benefits stand amid negotiations to end the government shutdown
    Why the AI stock boom mainly benefits the wealthy
    Boomers are less bullish on ETFs than younger generations — with good reason
    Trump floats $2,000 tariff rebate checks: Here’s what you need to know
    This is the ‘biggest mistake’ you can make with your IRA, attorney says
    Consumers on edge as ACA ‘subsidy cliff’ looms: ‘Quite frankly, it’s terrifying’
    How to have tricky money talks as a couple: ‘Money Together’ authors
    CNBC’s Financial Advisor 100: Best financial advisors, top firms for 2025 ranked

    When recipients of the fraudulent emails call the phone number provided, they may encounter someone impersonating a Social Security Administration employee who sometimes even uses a federal worker’s real name. Alternatively, callers may be directed to send a text via an automated message.
    The SSA OIG, which provides independent oversight of the Social Security Administration, is warning recipients not to share their personal information in response to the notices.
    “If you get an unexpected call, text, email, letter, or social media message from SSA OIG or any government agency, pause and think scam first,” Michelle L. Anderson, acting inspector general, said in a statement. “The person contacting you may not be who they claim to be.”     

    Notably, the SSA OIG “will never send letters like this,” Anderson said.

    Older adults more likely to report scam losses

    Government imposter scams may also purport to be from other agencies — the Social Security Administration, IRS, Medicare or Federal Trade Commission, for example. Other schemes may claim to represent well-known businesses.
    In 2024, consumers reported losing more than $12.5 billion to fraud — a 25% increase over the previous year, the Federal Trade Commission reported in March.
    Investment scams were the most common way to lose money, with $5.7 billion in losses reported by consumers in 2024, followed by imposter scams, with $2.95 billion in losses.
    Adults ages 60 and over are most likely to report losses of tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of dollars from scams, according to the FTC. The number of older adults who reported losing $10,000 or more to scams went up more than four times from 2020 to 2024, the agency reported in August. In those same years, the number of older adults who reported losing more than $100,000 jumped nearly seven times.

    To avoid becoming a victim, the FTC warns consumers targeted by these types of scams not to send or transfer money to anyone.
    The agency also recommends independently verifying whether a phone number or website is real and talking to someone you know and trust before transferring money.
    Blocking unwanted calls can also prevent scammers from contacting you in the first place, according to the FTC. More