More stories

  • in

    This is the ‘biggest mistake’ you can make with your IRA, attorney says

    As of mid-2024, individual retirement accounts collectively held $16.2 trillion of assets, according to a March report from the Investment Company Institute.
    But many investors overlook beneficiary designations, which dictate who receives the account after you die.
    The error could incur significantly higher fees and taxes, or worse, disburse the account to the wrong heir.

    mapodile | E+ | Getty Images

    LAS VEGAS — Millions of households have individual retirement accounts, and simple mistakes can be expensive, experts warn.  
    One of the most common IRA errors is overlooking beneficiary designations, which dictate who receives the account after you die, according to Brandon Buckingham, vice president for the advanced planning group for Prudential Retirement Strategies.

    It’s “the biggest mistake people make,” said Buckingham, speaking at the Financial Planning Association’s annual conference on Tuesday. Some investors don’t name a beneficiary or leave an outdated heir. The latter is particularly problematic, since beneficiary designations override what’s outlined in your will, he said.  
    “I can’t tell you how many times I’ve seen an ex-spouse inherit an IRA or 401(k) account,” Buckingham said. “It happens all the time.”

    More from Your Money:

    Here’s a look at more stories on how to manage, grow and protect your money for the years ahead.

    As of mid-2024, nearly 58 million U.S. households, or about 44%, owned IRAs, up from 34% a decade ago, according to a March report from the Investment Company Institute, a trade organization. These accounts collectively held $16.2 trillion in assets around mid-year 2024.
    That growth has been fueled by employer retirement account rollovers, such as 401(k) plans, with nearly 60% of pretax traditional IRAs including rollovers in 2024, the report found.
    With trillions of wealth in IRAs, investors need to stay organized with beneficiary designations, which can easily be overlooked when you have multiple accounts, Buckingham said.

    The ‘worst beneficiary’ for your IRA

    If you don’t name a beneficiary for your IRA, the default is usually your estate, Buckingham said.
    “The worst beneficiary you can ever have for a retirement account is the estate, whether it’s on purpose or by default,” he said.
    If you name a beneficiary, the account is payable to the heir upon death. But without a beneficiary, the assets go through probate, a legal process to settle the estate after death — which can be costly and time-consuming, Buckingham said.  
    In the meantime, income to the estate from the IRA is subject to a “very compressed tax bracket” because it hits the 37% rate once earnings exceed $15,650 for 2025, he said. By comparison, a married couple filing jointly reaches the 37% income tax bracket around $750,000 of taxable income for 2025.    
    Another issue is that an estate-owned IRA must be emptied within five years, Buckingham said. Typically, non-spouse heirs have 10 years to deplete inherited IRAs, which provides more time for tax planning. More

  • in

    Top Wall Street analysts favor these 3 tech stocks for their growth outlook

    David Ryder | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    High valuations for artificial intelligence (AI) stocks were the focus of the market this week, with fears of a potential AI bubble capping investor sentiment. But the view on Wall Street is still that several tech stocks offer strong fundamentals and are delivering rapid, AI-induced growth, justifying their sky-high valuations.
    The recommendations of top Wall Street analysts can help investors find attractive AI stocks displaying robust long-term growth outlooks.

    Here are three stocks favored by the Street’s top pros, according to TipRanks, a platform that ranks analysts based on their past performance.
    Amazon
    E-commerce and cloud computing giant Amazon (AMZN) recently impressed investors with its upbeat Q3 results. Accelerating growth in the Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud unit confirmed the Street’s faith in Amazon’s expansion into artificial intelligence.
    In reaction to the solid Q3 print and the recently-announced deal with OpenAI, Mizuho analyst Lloyd Walmsley increased his price forecast for Amazon to $315 from $300 and reiterated a buy rating. TipRanks’ AI Analyst is also bullish on AMZN stock, with an “outperform” rating and a price target of $276.
    Walmsley said that the Q3 performance, OpenAI deal and positive outlook for Amazon’s Trainium chips made him more optimistic toward AWS’s long-term growth. In fact, the 5-star analyst expects acceleration in AWS revenue growth from 20% in Q3 to 21% in Q4 2025 and 22% in the first quarter of 2026. He expects AWS revenue to rise by 23% to $157 billion in the full year 2026, followed by a 22% increase to $192 billion in 2027 — above the Street’s expectations of $154 billion and $185 billion for 2026 and 2027, respectively.
    “We believe investors continue to rotate into AMZN shares given a valuation well below its historic ranges and positive news likely to continue into the AWS ReInvent Conference in early December,” said Walmsley.

    The analyst’s bullish investment thesis is also based on the cost-to-serve improvements in Amazon’s retail business, driven by automation in fulfillment centers and an enhanced logistics network.
    Walmsley ranks No. 103 among more than 10,100 analysts tracked by TipRanks. His ratings have been successful 64% of the time, delivering an average return of 27.5%. See Amazon Insider Trading Activity on TipRanks.
    Alphabet
    This second stock pick is Google- and YouTube owner Alphabet (GOOGL). The company reported better-than-expected third-quarter results, with AI driving solid momentum in its cloud business.
    Impressed by the Q3 performance, JPMorgan analyst Doug Anmuth raised his price target for Alphabet to $340 from $300 and reaffirmed a buy rating. In comparison, TipRanks’ AI Analyst has a price target of $316 with an “outperform” rating on GOOGL.
    Anmuth highlighted that Q3 marked the first time that Alphabet’s quarterly revenue crossed the $100 billion mark. The top-rated analyst noted Alphabet’s robust performance in the third quarter, with double-digit growth across every major business.
    Interestingly, Anmuth believes that Q3 results and favorable insights on AI search formats could change investors’ views toward Google’s AI search transition. Alphabet noted AI-induced acceleration in query growth and paid clicks, while Anmuth noted that industry conversations indicate that paid clicks using Google’s AI Overviews (AIO) and AI Mode (AIM) features are driving higher conversion rates.
    “Overall, the AI search transition has been viewed as the greatest risk to Google, but additional signs that AI search is more opportunity than threat will continue to flip the narrative,” said Anmuth.
    The analyst is also encouraged by the surge in Google Cloud’s backlog to $155 billion. He contends that the figure doesn’t include all the gains from the recently announced expansion of GOOGL’s partnership with Anthropic, implying a further increase in the backlog at the end of the fourth quarter. Overall, Anmuth is confident about Alphabet’s prospects and said it remains JPMorgan’s Top 2 idea, behind only Amazon.
    Anmuth ranks No. 113 among more than 10,100 analysts tracked by TipRanks. His ratings have been profitable 63% of the time, delivering an average return of 22%. See Alphabet Ownership Structure on TipRanks.
    Advanced Micro Devices
    The third tech giant this week is chipmaker Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), which delivered strong results in the third quarter of Fiscal 2025. AMD attributed stronger earnings and revenue to its expanding compute business and fast-growing AI data center segment.
    In reaction, Stifel analyst Ruben Roy increased his price target for AMD to $280 from $240 and reiterated a buy rating. With a price target of $285, TipRanks’ AI Analyst has an “outperform” rating on AMD stock.
    Roy noted that AMD’s Q3 top line was driven by strength across the company’s data center, AI, server and PC businesses. The 5-star analyst highlighted management’s optimism toward continued momentum in Q4 FY25, with revenue expected to grow 25% year-over-year to $9.6 billion. AMD expects Q4 revenue growth will be supported by strong performances in its data center, client and embedded businesses, partially offset by a double-digit decline in the gaming segment.
    Interestingly, Roy believes that AMD’s performance in the near-term is being fueled more by increasing demand for server central processing units and continued share gains in client CPUs rather than data center AI graphics processing units. The analyst expects AMD’s data center AI GPU business to increase to a range of $6 billion to $6.5 billion in FY25, versus a prior estimate of $5 billion.
    “Looking ahead, we continue to believe that AMD is executing well as the company nears production shipments of the MI400/450 series GPUs and the Helios rack next year,” Roy said.
    The analyst is also optimistic on AMD’s recently-announced deals with OpenAI and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, saying they provide clarity on the longer-term growth outlook in its data center AI business. Roy awaits further insights from AMD about its technology roadmap and total addressable market (TAM) at an upcoming Analyst Day event on November 11.
    Roy ranks No. 20 among more than 10,100 analysts tracked by TipRanks. His ratings have been profitable 71% of the time, delivering an average return of 34.4%. See AMD Statistics on TipRanks. More

  • in

    Consumers on edge as ACA ‘subsidy cliff’ looms: ‘Quite frankly, it’s terrifying’

    Roughly 92% of enrollees in Affordable Care Act marketplace health insurance plans, about 22 million people, receive enhanced premium subsidies.
    The average recipient will see premiums more than double in 2026 if Congress doesn’t extend the enhanced subsidies.
    The issue is at the epicenter of the federal government shutdown, now the longest in U.S. history.
    About 1 in 10 ACA enrollees would lose a premium tax credit altogether. Households are worried about shouldering those costs.

    Members of the National Guard patrol near the U.S. Capitol on Oct. 1, 2025 in Washington, DC.
    Al Drago | Getty Images

    Millions of Americans are bracing for a sharp increase in their health insurance premiums next year as expiring enhanced subsidies trigger a “cliff” on aid — and they are worried about the financial stress tied to those extra costs.
    Ashley Thompson of Austin, Texas, said she and her husband are weighing whether to drop their health coverage next year and insure only their two children to make the financials work.

    Premiums for the family’s current health plan on the Affordable Care Act marketplace could triple, to about $3,553 a month in 2026 from $1,200 this year, without the enhanced federal subsidies set to expire at year’s end, based on marketplace estimates.
    That expense, almost $43,000 a year, would account for roughly a third or more of their household income — and that’s before even using the insurance, said Thompson, 49, who is a ceramic artist and physical trainer.
    “Quite frankly, it’s terrifying,” she said.

    Health premiums poised to double — or more

    Thompson and her family are among the 22 million Americans who receive enhanced subsidies that make health premiums cheaper. Overall, that group accounts for 92% of the 24 million people enrolled in an ACA marketplace plan.
    The enhanced premium subsidies are at the epicenter of the political fight around the federal government shutdown, now the longest in U.S. history.

    Democrats are pushing to extend the subsidies as part of a deal to reopen the government, while Republicans have said they want to negotiate the subsidies separately.
    Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer on Friday proposed a one-year extension of the existing enhanced subsidies as part of a deal to reopen the government. The deal would also establish a bipartisan committee to continue negotiations on long-term reforms to address the issue of health-care affordability.

    More than half, 57%, of ACA marketplace enrollees live in Republican congressional districts, according to a recent KFF analysis. This year, about 80% of all premium tax credits, or $115 billion, went to ACA marketplace enrollees in states won by President Trump in last year’s election, KFF found.
    Political pundits have cited affordability as a key issue that drove Democrats like New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani to victories in Tuesday’s elections.
    Without enhanced subsidies, the average recipient’s annual insurance premium will jump 114%, to $1,904 in 2026 from $888 in 2025, according to KFF, a nonpartisan health policy research group.
    “On average, to keep their same plan, people getting a subsidy now will see their premium payments double next year,” said Cynthia Cox, vice president and director of KFF’s program on the Affordable Care Act.

    Read more CNBC personal finance coverage

    Some, like Americans whose incomes exceed a certain threshold, will pay much more. They’d be ineligible for any premium assistance due to the so-called “subsidy cliff.”
    Take a 60-year-old couple earning $85,000 a year, for example, which is just over the threshold: Their annual premiums would rise by almost $23,000 in 2026, on average, according to KFF.

    The impact of losing enhanced premium subsidies

    The political fight around enhanced subsidies, which were enacted in 2021 under the Biden administration, is playing out during the ACA marketplace’s open enrollment, when would-be enrollees are picking their health plans for 2026.
    They must do so by Dec. 15 to be covered at the start of the new year.
    “Open enrollment is already starting with this big question mark,” Cox said.

    U.S. House Minority Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) speaks on the current government shutdown during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on Oct. 6, 2025 in Washington, DC.
    Alex Wong | Getty Images

    Swelling health insurance premiums will likely have many consequences for households, according to health policy experts.
    The Congressional Budget Office estimates about 4 million more people will join the ranks of the uninsured over the next decade if the enhanced subsidies disappear.
    That likely wouldn’t happen immediately, Cox said. More than a million may drop coverage next year if they decide insurance premiums are unaffordable, she said.
    Others may opt to buy lower-tier plans with smaller upfront premiums, she said. Those plans typically have much higher deductibles, meaning households would be on the hook for a hefty bill if they need to use their insurance, Cox said.
    In later years, some of these enrollees would likely drop their coverage, too, if they grow weary of the system and higher costs, Cox said.

    The healthcare.gov website on a laptop arranged in Norfolk, Virginia, US, on Saturday, Nov. 1, 2025.
    Stefani Reynolds | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Other enrollees, like Beth Keenan, say they intend to keep their current health plan and absorb the higher costs by cutting other expenses.
    Keenan, 62, an early retiree who lives in Pittsburgh, is using her ACA marketplace insurance plan as a bridge to Medicare benefits at age 65.
    She pays $589 a month in premiums, after accounting for a $302 monthly federal subsidy, also known as a premium tax credit. If the enhanced subsidies expire, Keenan’s estimated net premium would jump to $1,065, up 81%, based on estimates from the state marketplace.
    Keenan’s annual pension and Social Security income, totaling about $80,000, would be too high to qualify for aid.
    “You get tax credits for private airplanes,” said Keenan, who retired at 60 from her job as a county court administrator, a post she held for three decades. “Why shouldn’t I get a tax break?”

    US Senate Majority Leader John Thune, Republican of South Dakota, speaks to reporters on day 37 of the government shutdown, at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, November 6, 2025.
    Saul Loeb | Afp | Getty Images

    Keenan expects the extra $500 or so per month won’t cause financial hardship, she said. But the sum will likely force her to pull back on certain lifestyle expenses like travel, she said.
    The uncertainty around the availability of subsidies into the future is unnerving, especially knowing that insurers might raise premiums again for 2027, she said.
    Insurers raised premiums an estimated 26% for 2026, on average, for example, according to KFF, exacerbating the loss of enhanced subsidies.
    “I know what I’m doing [for] next year, but I have one year after that” before Medicare benefits start, Keenan said. “Are premiums going up [another] 20%? And then where else do you get insurance?”

    Subsidy cliff is ‘an unfortunate disincentive to work’

    While certain enrollees would still qualify for a lesser tax credit if the enhanced subsidies disappear, those with incomes above 400% of the federal poverty level would no longer qualify for assistance.
    This is the so-called “subsidy cliff.”
    That threshold varies by household size. It’s $62,600 for a one-person household and $128,600 for a four-person household in 2026, for example.
    Since 2021, the enhanced subsidies have been available to households that earn more than that. Annual premiums were also capped at 8.5% of household income.

    If the enhanced subsidies expire, that income cap would disappear, and those who earn even $1 above the 400% poverty line would be ineligible for premium tax credits. This would impact about 1 in 10 enrollees in an ACA marketplace plan, according to KFF.
    Matthew Espinoza, 46, is right on the cusp of that income threshold.
    The San Francisco resident, who works as a fitness instructor and restaurant server, expects his income to be roughly $60,000 to $65,000 next year, depending on how many hours he works.
    Where his income ultimately falls would make a big financial difference if the enhanced subsidies disappear, said Espinoza, who is also a full-time nursing student.

    The healthcare.gov website on a laptop arranged in Norfolk, Virginia, US, on Saturday, Nov. 1, 2025.
    Stefani Reynolds | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    He pays $324 a month for subsidized ACA insurance premiums this year.
    Those subsidized premiums would rise to about $461 per month in 2026 if his annual income is $60,000, according to estimates through Covered California, the state marketplace. However, that premium would jump to $818 a month with a $65,000 income, since he’d no longer qualify for assistance.
    “I haven’t had to cut down on savings when I started school, but that’d probably be the first thing that took a major hit” if forced to pay the $818 premium, Espinoza said.
    Espinoza said he’d be hyper-aware of his income in 2026 and, if it flirts with the 400% poverty threshold, he may try to limit his work hours to ensure eligibility for a premium tax credit.
    The subsidy cliff “is an unfortunate disincentive to work,” said KFF’s Cox. “For some families, it totally makes financial sense, especially if they really need the health insurance.”

    Open enrollment is already starting with this big question mark.

    Cynthia Cox
    vice president and director of KFF’s program on the Affordable Care Act

    Thompson, the Austin resident, doesn’t want to drop her health coverage.
    But even lower-tier plans with high deductibles available on the ACA marketplace would still cost at least $3,000 a month for her family of four, she said, based on estimates via the marketplace.
    “We are not broke, but this would put us in that position,” she said. “It’s not the only bill.”
    They’re also looking into various options, such as insuring only their two children and using a cooperative health share for Thompson and her husband, she said. (Such services aren’t technically health insurance, and may come with various risks.)
    “People think it’s people who are undeserving that get subsidies,” Thompson said. “But it’s just neighbors, regular people.” More

  • in

    Carl Icahn returns to a familiar sector — auto repair — as he builds a 15% stake in Monro

    Monro Auto Service in Derby, CT.
    Source: Google Earth

    Company: Monro (MNRO)
    Business: Monro, formerly Monro Muffler Brake, is engaged in the provision of automotive undercar repair and tire services in the United States. The company provides a range of services on passenger cars, light trucks and vans for brakes; mufflers and exhaust systems, and steering, drive train, suspension and wheel alignment. It also offers tires and routine maintenance services, which include state inspections. It offers repair and replacement of parts. Its stores provide a range of undercar repair services for brakes, steering, mufflers and exhaust systems, suspension and wheel alignment, as well as tire replacement and service. It also offers scheduled maintenance services in its stores where services are packaged and offered to consumers based upon the year, make, model and mileage of each specific vehicle. Its maintenance services include oil change services, heating and cooling system flush and fill service, fuel system service and a transmission flush and fill service.
    Stock Market Value: $458.40 million ($15.27 per share)

    Stock chart icon

    Monro shares year to date

    Activist: Carl Icahn

    Ownership: 14.79%
    Average Cost: $19.08
    Activist Commentary: Carl Icahn is the grandfather of shareholder activism and a true pioneer of the strategy. He is very passionate about shareholder rights and good corporate governance and will go to extreme lengths to fight incompetent boards and over compensated managers. Icahn has invested across all sectors over his more than six-decade long career and has a long history in the automotive parts and services industry. He has been involved in several mergers and acquisitions in this space, acquiring some of his portfolio companies through Icahn Automotive, the automotive-segment business of his conglomerate, Icahn Enterprises. This includes his acquisition of Pep Boys-Manny Moe and Jack in 2016 and Federal Mogul in 2017.
    What’s happening
    On Nov. 5, Carl Icahn filed a 13D with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, disclosing a 14.79% position in Monro.
    Behind the scenes
    Monro is engaged in the provision of automotive undercar repair and tire services in the United States, operating more than 1,100 repair shops and tire dealers in 32 states under multiple regional brands. The company has faced several challenges in recent years. Macro factors like lower consumer demand, higher material and labor costs, and a trend in consumer trade-down to lower margin tire products have applied significant margin and growth pressure. As a result, following a 4.9% decrease in sales for fiscal year 2025 — the second year in a row with a meaningful decline in revenue — the company announced that they are closing approximately 145 underperforming locations.

    Most recently, the company’s third-quarter earnings report left a lot of investors disappointed about its strategic transition, with weaker-than-expected revenue and no specific financial guidance for the upcoming fiscal year. Shares fell 16.7% the next day. Lastly, many investors have questioned the company’s dividend payout ratio, which has remained relatively large despite these ongoing struggles.
    Putting all this together, it comes as little surprise that shares have underperformed, down 44.73%, 66.73% and 63.25% over the past 1-, 3- and 5-year periods, respectively, prior to Icahn’s announcement.
    Perhaps this depressed valuation is what caught the eye of Carl Icahn. He disclosed a 14.79% position in the company (67% of which was acquired since the stock’s Oct. 29 downturn), immediately sending the stock up over 15%.
    While there are plenty of cheap stocks, this isn’t Icahn taking a flyer on the automotive industry. Icahn has a rich history in the automotive parts and services industry, most notably Icahn Automotive, the automotive segment of his conglomerate, Icahn Enterprises. Icahn knows this industry well and likely sees Monro as a great business that is significantly undervalued.
    The timing of this public engagement is also very notable. It is not just the stock’s recent fall that makes this a good entry point for an investor like Icahn. Monro recently agreed to collapse its dual class share structure, which had previously granted its sole Class C shareholder, Peter Solomon, veto power over any matter brought to a shareholder vote, effectively making this a controlled company. Pursuant to its approval in 2023, this collapse will occur prior to the 2026 annual meeting, which is expected to take place next August.
    So, what does this mean for the company’s shareholders? It effectively sets the stage for the company being converted from a privately run company to a publicly run company for the benefit of its shareholders. With one person having veto power over all material board decisions, the rest of the board becomes somewhat irrelevant. With this conversion, the company has an opportunity to have a real, collaborative, and productive board. This would require its reconstitution, and we know of nobody better or more experienced than Icahn for that endeavor.
    Solomon is an 87-year-old renowned investment banker and Icahn is, well, Icahn and a contemporary of Solomon. However, there is no evidence that the two have ever crossed paths.
    Despite this, we would imagine that they have many relationships in common and mutual respect for each other. While there are many different ways this campaign can go down, what we would like to see is the two elder statesmen meeting in a room with an air of civility and cordiality uncommon in the average activist engagement and together coming up with a board that will oversee management, hold them accountable on behalf of shareholders and usher the company through its first real phase as a truly public company. With Solomon already agreeing to give up control, and neither Solomon nor Icahn likely to be on the continuing board, there is no reason why this should get contentious.
    However, we also must address the elephant in the room. Icahn has built his automotive industry on acquisitions, and Monro appears to fit in very nicely in IEP’s automotive business.
    Icahn has launched activist campaigns at some of the auto companies that he later went on to acquire, including Pep Boys-Manny Moe and Jack in 2016 and Federal Mogul in 2017. When Icahn acquired Pep Boys he also stated: “We believe that with our abundant resources and knowledge of the industry we will be able to grow this business and take advantage of consolidation opportunities, thereby benefiting customers, manufacturing partners and employees, as well as our shareholders.”
    While we sincerely believe that Icahn’s main motivation for this investment is to invest in a good company that he believes is at an inflection point and is significantly undervalued, there is always the chance that he might want to own the entire company one day. This is a very small position for him and a good return would not move the needle as much as a synergistic integration into his automative business, but we see no reason why both things cannot be true.
    Ken Squire is the founder and president of 13D Monitor, an institutional research service on shareholder activism, and the founder and portfolio manager of the 13D Activist Fund, a mutual fund that invests in a portfolio of activist investments. More

  • in

    Warren Buffett Watch: Cash fortress Berkshire closes gap with S&P 500 as AI worries depress Wall Street

    Buffett Watch

    Berkshire Hathaway Portfolio Tracker

    (This is the Warren Buffett Watch newsletter, news and analysis on all things Warren Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway. You can sign up here to receive it every Friday evening in your inbox.)

    Berkshire’s stock gains as AI worries depress Wall Street

    Arrows pointing outwards

    The upturn for Berkshire shares has cut its underperformance versus the benchmark S&P 500 to 4.3 percentage points from 12.2 percentage points on October 29.

    Arrows pointing outwards

    Operating profits for Berkshire’s wholly owned companies were up 34% to almost $13.5 billion in the third quarter, with a 200% increase for insurance underwriting income.
    There were again no stock buybacks, a sign Buffett does not think Berkshire shares are significantly undervalued despite their weakness since May.
    With no money spent on buying back Berkshire shares and equity sales outpacing purchases, the company’s September 30 cash hit $381.7 billion, up 10.9% since the end of June.

    If you subtract BNSF’s cash and account for the timing of some Treasury bill purchases, the total is $354.3 billion, up 4.3% from June.

    Buffett’s farewell message?

    Warren Buffett may be delivering his final message as Berkshire’s CEO next Monday.
    This week the company confirmed in a news release what it told the Wall Street Journal last week.
    “On Monday, November 10th, Berkshire will be issuing a press release which will contain a message from Mr. Buffett regarding philanthropy, Berkshire and other matters that Berkshire shareholders and others may find to be of interest.”

    Warren Buffett walks the floor ahead of the Berkshire Hathaway Annual Shareholders Meeting in Omaha, Nebraska on May 3, 2024.
    David A. Grogen | CNBC

    The philanthropy part will probably be connected to his annual Thanksgiving contributions to family foundations.
    The “Berkshire and other matters” portion could be something of a farewell message as he prepares to step down as CEO at the end of the year.
    While he will remain chairman of the board, he will not be on stage at next May’s meeting and new CEO Greg Abel will be writing the annual letter to shareholders.
    Since he appears to be intentionally limiting his future opportunities to speak to shareholders and the rest of the world, Buffett may be ready to have his final say now.

    10-Q clues point to more sales of Apple and Bank of America

    We won’t know for sure until next Friday’s release of Berkshire’s Q3 equity portfolio snapshot, but it looks like there were more sales of Apple shares during the three months ending September 30.
    CNBC.com’s Yun Li notes Berkshire’s 10-Q last Saturday reported a $1.2 billion decline in its cost basis for consumer product stocks, which would include Apple.
    She also points out that Apple’s 24% gain during the quarter would have provided an opportunity for Buffett to lock in more profits.
    Apple remains Berkshire’s largest equity holding, currently valued at $75.2 billion, but it has cut the position by 69% over the past two years.

    Arrows pointing outwards

    Barron’s divides that $1.2 billion cost basis drop by $35, Apple’s per-share basis, to estimate Berkshire may have sold 35 million shares for around $8 billion, based on Apple’s average price of $230 per share during the quarter.

    Arrows pointing outwards

    With Apple reporting in its 10-Q that it had $12.4 billion in Q3 equity sales, Barron’s suggests a lot of the remaining $4.4 billion may be Bank of America sales, another big position that Berkshire has been sharply reducing.
    That stake has been cut by around 40% since the beginning of last year.
    At $32.2 billion, it is Berkshire’s third largest equity holding.

    Borrowing more yen is expected to fuel more buying in Japan

    Arrows pointing outwards

    All five of the stocks are at or near all-time highs.
    The combined value of Berkshire’s reported holdings is approaching $33 billion, up from $31 billion just one month ago.
    The figure could be even higher assuming some of Berkshire’s continued buying has not yet been publicly revealed.

    Arrows pointing outwards

    ‘It’s not me’

    Berkshire Hathaway has a new warning about YouTube videos with “images or AI created images impersonating” Warren Buffett.
    A news release Thursday said, “Generally, such video images of Mr. Buffett may appear to look like him but the sound of the impersonator speaking in a very flat monotone voice is clearly not the voice of Mr. Buffett.”
    It added, “Mr. Buffett is concerned that these types of fraudulent videos are becoming a spreading virus. Individuals who are less familiar with Mr. Buffett may believe these videos are real and be misled by the contents of these videos.”
    In April, a Berkshire release cited unspecified “reports currently circulating on social media” about “comments allegedly made” by Buffett and said, “All such reports are false.”
    Buffett also warned shareholders at the 2024 Berkshire annual meeting that AI’s ability to create fake audio and video could make scamming “the growth industry of all time.”

    BUFFETT AROUND THE INTERNET

    Some links may require a subscription:

    HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE ARCHIVE
    In investing, you can’t be scared when others are scared (2010)

    Warren Buffett explains why investors should look at their stocks the same way they would look at owning a farm or an apartment.

    WARREN BUFFETT: If you have a temperament that when others are fearful, you’re going to get scared yourself, you know, you are not going to make a lot of money in securities over time, in all probability.
    You know, people really — if they didn’t look at quotations — but of course, the whole world is urging them to look at quotations, and more than that, do something based on small changes in quotations.
    But think how much more rational — we’ve talked about it before — but think how much more rational investing in a farm is than the way many people buy stocks.
    If you buy a farm, do you get a quote next week, do you get a quote next month? If you buy an apartment house, do you get a quote next week or month?
    No, you look at the apartment house or the farm, and you say, “I expect it to produce so many bushels of soybeans and corn, and if it does that, it meets my expectations.”
    If they buy a stock and they think if it goes up it’s wonderful, and if it goes down it’s bad.
    We think just the opposite. When it goes down, we love it, because we’ll buy more. And if it goes up, it kills us to buy more.
    And I — you know — all kinds — you know, Ben Graham wrote about it. It’s been explained. But if you can’t get yourself in that mental attitude, you’re going to be scared whenever everybody else is scared.
    And to expect somebody else to tell you when to buy and therefore get your courage back up or something, you know —
    I could get this fellow’s courage up substantially by saying this is a wonderful time to buy, and then a week from now he’d run into somebody else that tells him the world is coming to an end and he’d sell.
    I mean, he’s a broker’s friend, but he’s not going to make a lot of money.

    BERKSHIRE STOCK WATCH

    Four weeks

    Arrows pointing outwards

    Twelve months

    Arrows pointing outwards

    BERKSHIRE’S TOP STOCK HOLDINGS – Nov. 7, 2025

    Arrows pointing outwards

    Berkshire’s top holdings of disclosed publicly traded stocks in the U.S., Japan, and Hong Kong, by market value, based on today’s closing prices.
    Holdings are as of June 30, 2025 as reported in Berkshire Hathaway’s 13F filing on August 14, 2025, except for:

    The full list of holdings and current market values is available from CNBC.com’s Berkshire Hathaway Portfolio Tracker.

    QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS

    Please send any questions or comments about the newsletter to me at [email protected]. (Sorry, but we don’t forward questions or comments to Buffett himself.)
    If you aren’t already subscribed to this newsletter, you can sign up here.
    Also, Buffett’s annual letters to shareholders are highly recommended reading. There are collected here on Berkshire’s website.
    — Alex Crippen, Editor, Warren Buffett Watch More

  • in

    Have tricky money talks with your partner, ‘Money Together’ authors say: ‘Your dreams need real roadmaps’

    In their new book, “Money Together,” Heather and Douglas Boneparth share advice with couples on how to talk about and manage the fraught topic of finances.
    “At some point, your loose conversations have to turn concrete,” they write in their book, published in October. “Your dreams need real roadmaps.”

    Douglas and Heather Boneparth
    Photo: Sylvie Rosokoff

    Love is complicated. Add in money and it gets even more so.
    But in their new book “Money Together,” Heather and Douglas Boneparth argue that having honest and proactive discussions about finances can make partners closer — and eventually, wealthier.

    They begin their book, published last month, with an anecdote of a couple who had the difficult money talk a little late — on their honeymoon, over a cold seafood salad in Positano, Italy. (The Boneparths were also on vacation, and eavesdropping.) It became clear that the arguing pair had just discovered the husband had credit card debt, and that the wife’s parents weren’t paying off her student loans.
    Of course, it would have been better if this couple had sorted these things out before they walked down the aisle. Yet couples fight so often about finances, at all stages, because “money is more than money,” Heather tells CNBC. Beneath these arguments is each partner’s unique history, disappointments, fears, desires and expectations.

    More from Financial Advisor Playbook:

    Here’s a look at other stories affecting the financial advisor business.

    Heather and Douglas, who met during their freshman year of college and married in 2013, provide readers with advice on how to talk about money with your partner, and how to manage your finances in a long-term relationship to make it easier to get out of debt, buy a house and accomplish other shared and separate goals. In their telling, that’ll first involve understanding what money means to your partner and why — and moving beyond fantasies about the future and each other.
    “At some point, your loose conversations have to turn concrete,” they write in their book. “Your dreams need real roadmaps.”
    Douglas is a certified financial planner, the president of Bone Fide Wealth in New York and a member of CNBC’s Financial Advisor Council. Heather, Bone Fide Wealth’s director of business and legal affairs, is a writer and former corporate attorney.

    The interview below has been edited and condensed for clarity.

    ‘When there is scarcity, you see shame rear its head’

    Annie Nova: You guys write that couples fight about money, no matter how much or little they have of it. Why do you think that is?
    Heather Boneparth: Because money is more than money. Some of the emotions we tie to money include love, safety, independence, trust, control — and that’s true for people from any socioeconomic background. But when there is scarcity, you see shame rear its head in different ways. You also see partners in conflict over what constitutes acceptable ways to earn or borrow money, which might relate back to your culture or how you were raised.
    AN: Heather, you describe realizing that your decision to borrow $200,000 in student debt was a huge mistake. But having Doug as a partner helped you find a way out. How so?
    HB: Debt can feel like a perpetual reminder that you are lacking; not just in money, but in other ways, too. But Doug co-signed the loan to refinance my student loan debt. Knowing what an emotional impact the debt had on me, this was a more sweeping gesture than almost anything a partner could have done. He was saying, “Your burdens are my burdens.”

    “Money Together” by Heather and Douglas Boneparth
    Courtesy: Heather and Douglas Boneparth

    AN: You also write that you “cringe” at the idea of being saved. Why is that, and what does it have to do with entering your 40s?
    HB: I don’t like the idea of having saviors and those who need saving in relationships. It lays the foundation for a disparate power dynamic. Often, it implies that the partner who needed saving could not save themselves, and that partner begins to believe it. They believe that they don’t have the skills or knowledge to participate in the household finances, when that’s simply not true.
    When I mention my age here, it’s more to demonstrate that a lot can change in a decade. I’ve built my confidence back, brick by brick. 

    ‘Making room’ for your partner’s money perspectives

    AN: You write about how important it is “to make room” for your partner. What does this mean from a financial perspective?
    HB: Some of our deepest feelings around money stem from our individual backgrounds. Now, try marrying those beliefs and behaviors with someone else’s. It’s not easy, and we don’t always take the time to understand enough about our partner’s underlying feelings around money and why they do what they do. That’s how you end up in recurring arguments about surface-level issues like a credit card bill rather than getting to the root cause of why you and your partner have differing views around lifestyle and spending. 
    I think “making room” from a financial perspective means making room at the table for your partner’s financial beliefs, goals, appetite for risk and opinions about how you save, spend and invest.
    AN: What are the risks of failing to talk about money together, and even hiding things from your partner?
    Doug Boneparth: Resentment and a breakdown of trust. When you hide financial details from your partner, whether it’s debt, spending habits, or something you’re just embarrassed about, it never stays hidden forever. Having to explain something uncomfortable later only makes it harder to deal with.

    ‘Talk about money without talking about money’

    AN: How early on should a couple start to talk about money?
    DB: The earlier, the better. But that doesn’t mean you have to dive right into the numbers. Imagine talking about that on a third date? Not cool. But there are so many ways to talk about money without talking about money. You can learn a lot by asking questions about someone’s past, like what their childhood was like, where they are from and what they value.
    AN: What do you think is the ideal arrangement for a married couple to share their money? Joint or separate accounts? And why?
    DB: I’ve found that joint accounts for managing household expenses work best. It promotes transparency and teamwork. When both partners can see what’s coming in and going out, it reinforces that you’re in this together. That said, there’s nothing wrong with keeping your own individual checking accounts, too. Maintaining your sense of financial autonomy can be really healthy.

    Using ‘financial fairness’ to navigate imbalances

    AN: How can couples navigate a big difference in wealth or income between them? 
    DB: You can’t bridge that gap if you don’t first acknowledge it. But when one partner earns or has more, unspoken assumptions can creep in. That’s where disparate power dynamics can calcify. Instead, Heather and I write about “financial fairness.” Fairness means you both feel respected and seen for what you value individually and as a couple. One person might earn more while the other contributes in different but equally meaningful ways, like managing the home, raising kids and planning for the future.

    AN: What are some of the couple discussions that need to happen around family wealth and inheritances? What about when there is also an imbalance here, with, say, one person standing to inherit a large amount and another partner nothing? 
    DB: Conversations around family wealth and inheritance can be tricky because they’re rarely just about money. They can carry a lot of grief and expectations. The best thing couples can do is treat inherited wealth as part of a shared conversation. Talk about what that money represents, what boundaries you want around it and how it fits into your long-term goals together.
    AN: There’s a lot of headlines in the news lately about layoffs. How can couples best respond when one person loses their job?
    HB: You don’t want to offer solutions too fast to your partner when they might still be reeling from their job loss. For some, losing your job can feel like losing your identity or your power. Those are heavy feelings that need some space to breathe. But of course, you do need to eventually address what transitions or accommodations might need to take place in your lives due to a loss of income. More

  • in

    As FAA order triggers flight cancellations and delays, what to know about credit card travel insurance

    About 748 U.S. flights scheduled to depart on Friday have been canceled, according to Cirium
    Only 29% of consumer credit cards offer trip cancellation insurance, on average providing $6,361 worth of coverage, according to WalletHub.
    “Credit card travel insurance may help in some cases, but it’s not a guaranteed safety net for delays and cancellations tied to the FAA’s flight reductions,” said WalletHub analyst Chip Lupo in an email.

    As air travel cancellations and delays mount during the government shutdown, affected travelers will want to consider all their avenues for recourse — including the credit card they used to book their flight.
    U.S. airlines began canceling flights on Friday, in response to an Federal Aviation Administration order reducing flight capacity at 40 airports. The disruption could potentially impact hundreds of thousands of fliers. 

    “If you are traveling the next couple of weeks, you should expect that there is going to be some chaos and there are likely to be disruptions,” said Hayley Berg, the lead economist at travel site Hopper.
    The FAA estimates it handles more than 44,000 domestic flights every day. Reducing these flights in 40 airports will impact over 268,000 airline seats and up to 1,800 flights a day, according to Cirium, an aviation analytics firm.
    About 748 U.S. flights scheduled to depart on Friday, or 3%, have been canceled as of mid-morning, according to Cirium. Saturday cancellations are already at 1.7%.

    More from Your Money:

    Here’s a look at more stories on how to manage, grow and protect your money for the years ahead.

    Traditional travel insurance may not necessarily cover costs you incur related to this disruption, unless you have “cancel for any reason” or “interruption for any reason” benefits, experts say. 
    If you purchased your ticket with a credit card that offers travel insurance, you may not be covered for costs related to any disruptions, either. 

    Credit card coverage ‘not a guaranteed safety net’

    Travelers arrive at Los Angeles International Airport on Monday, Nov. 3, 2025 in Los Angeles, CA.
    Juliana Yamada | Los Angeles Times | Getty Images

    “Credit card travel insurance may help in some cases, but it’s not a guaranteed safety net for delays and cancellations tied to the FAA’s flight reductions,” said WalletHub analyst Chip Lupo in an email.
    It isn’t a common perk: Only 29% of consumer credit cards provide trip cancellation insurance, providing an average coverage of $6,361, according to WalletHub. Just 18% come with travel delay insurance, providing an average coverage of $445. 
    The level of coverage can also vary significantly, depending on the type of credit card you have. 
    If you used your travel credit card to book your upcoming trip, “the best cards will typically address the most common travel disruptions, such as lengthy delays or a last-minute cancellation,” Lauren McCormick, a spokesperson at the travel insurance website Squaremouth, said in an email. “However, each issuer has its own list of covered reasons and exclusions.”
    Review your card’s benefits guide to understand exactly what’s included.

    Often, credit card travel insurance can help fill in gaps, including reimbursement for reasonable expenses if you’re delayed for an extended period or if there are non-refundable charges, like a hotel stay, meals or missed prepaid events tied to your flight, experts say.
    “Credit card travel insurance can help if you’re stranded,” said Bankrate senior industry analyst Ted Rossman. “That coverage may pay for a new flight on a different carrier or reimburse you for hotels or meals if you’re stuck somewhere.”
    Even so, Rossman said, “A lot of times, your best bet is to get relief from the airline if the flight is cancelled, or a travel credit if you’re the one to initiate the change.” If you submit a claim to a travel insurance company, insurers generally want to know that you’ve first checked with the airline for relief. 
    “Check your card’s benefits guide before traveling and monitor airline waivers closely, since many carriers are temporarily allowing changes and cancellations for no fee during this period,” Lupo said.
    Other credit card benefits may help travelers facing shutdown disruptions. If you’re stuck at the airport with a delayed flight, see if you have a credit card that offers free or discounted lounge access. To mitigate airport security wait times, some cards will offset the cost of expedited screening memberships like TSA PreCheck or Clear.
    SIGN UP: Money 101 is an 8-week learning course on financial freedom, delivered weekly to your inbox. Sign up here. It is also available in Spanish. More

  • in

    MP Materials CEO warns investors to approach suddenly hot rare earths industry with caution

    MP Materials CEO James Litinsky cautioned investors to approach other rare earth projects with caution as the market speculates about future government deals.
    The Defense Department struck a landmark agreement with MP in July that includes an equity stake, price floor, and offtake agreement.
    “The vast majority of projects being promoted today simply will not work at virtually any price,” Litinksy said on MP’s earnings call.

    Pentagon-backed MP Materials warned investors this week to approach other rare earths projects with caution, pointing to the industry’s difficult economics.
    Stocks of U.S. rare earth companies have had wild swings in recent months as investors have speculated that the Trump administration might strike more deals along the lines of its landmark agreement with MP. Smaller retail traders have gotten involved in the stocks with the VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF up 60% this year.The Defense Department in July took an equity stake in MP, set a price floor for the company, and inked an offtake agreement with the rare earth miner and magnet maker in an effort to roll back China’s dominance of the industry.

    CEO James Litinsky said he didn’t want “people to get burned” amid the speculation. Litinsky cautioned investors “to just be very clear-eyed about what the actual structural economics are amidst all the excitement.”
    “The vast majority of projects being promoted today simply will not work at virtually any price,” Litinksy said on the company’s third-quarter earnings call Thursday evening.

    Stock chart icon

    VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF, YTD

    MP views itself as “America’s national champion,” Litinsky said. MP is the only active rare earth miner in the U.S. and has offtake agreements with Apple and General Motors in addition to the Pentagon.
    “We have structural advantage because we’re fully vertically integrated,” the CEO said. “We’re years and billions ahead of others.”
    It takes years for the best rare earth producers to ramp up and stabilize their output and economics “despite what some promoters might suggest,” Litinksy said. Australia’s Lynas took about a decade and MP will reach normalized production in about three years from the start of commissioning, he said.

    The White House is “not ruling out other deals with equity stakes or price floors as we did with MP Materials, but that doesn’t mean every initiative we take would be in the shape of the MP deal,” a Trump administration official told CNBC in September.
    Litinsky described the rare earth industry as close to a “structural oligopoly,” a system where there are just a few major players. The government investing in a dozens of sites and businesses wouldn’t necessarily set up a supply chain, he said.
    The Trump administration should continue to encourage private capital to flow into the industry through loans, grants and other support, Litinsky said. There is room for “a lot of other players and supply” but the market will require “materially higher prices” for the industry’s structural challenges to change, he said.
    “If X dollars of capital can stimulate two or three X in private capital, they should be doing that as much as possible,” Litinsky said.
    The CEO indicated that he views MP as a forerunner that will help create the conditions for a broader market that is not dependent on China over time.
    “In the very short term the administration has made sure that we have a successful national champion in MP,” Litinsky said. “We are going to sort of pave the path if you will to then figure out how there’s much broader supply coming online.”
    Rare earths are crucial for making magnets that are key inputs in U.S. weapons platforms, semiconductor manufacturing, electric vehicles, clean energy technology and consumer electronics. Beijing dominates the global supply chain and the U.S. is dependent on China for imports. More