Raphael Stevens

ETF Strategist

ETF Street
ETF Strategist

Investors have added money to actively managed exchange-traded funds in recent years, while pulling money from active mutual funds.
That’s largely because of ETF cost advantages, including lower investment fees and greater tax efficiencies, experts said.

Images By Tang Ming Tung | Digitalvision | Getty Images

Actively managed exchange-traded funds are a growing trend in the investment space.
To that point, investors have pulled money from active mutual funds and sought out actively managed ETFs in recent years. Investors yanked about $2.2 trillion from active mutual funds from 2019 through October 2024, according to Morningstar data. At the same time, they added about $603 billion to active ETFs.

Active ETFs had positive annual inflows from 2019 through 2023 and are on pace for positive inflows in 2024, according to Morningstar. Meanwhile, active mutual funds lost money in all but one year (2021); they shed $344 billion in the first 10 months of 2024.

“We see [active ETFs] as the growth engine of active management,” said Bryan Armour, director of passive strategies research for North America at Morningstar. While acknowledg
“It’s still in the early innings,” he said. “But it’s been a bright spot in an otherwise cloudy market.”
At a high level, mutual funds and ETFs are similar.
They are legal structures that hold investor assets. But investors have gravitated toward ETFs in recent years due to cost benefits they generally enjoy relative to mutual funds, experts said.

Why fees matter

Fund managers who use active management are actively selecting stocks, bonds or other securities that they expect to outperform a market benchmark.
This active management generally costs more than passive investing.
Passive investing, used in index funds, doesn’t require as much hands-on work from money managers, who basically replicate the returns of a market benchmark like the S&P 500 U.S. stock index. Their fees are generally lower as a result.
Active mutual funds and ETFs had an average asset-weighted expense ratio of 0.59% in 2023, versus 0.11% for index funds, according to Morningstar data.

More from ETF Strategist:

Here’s a look at other stories offering insight on ETFs for investors.

Data shows that active managers tend to perform worse over the long term than their peer index funds, after accounting for fees.
About 85% of large-cap active mutual funds underperformed the S&P 500 over the past 10 years, for example, according to data from S&P Global.
As a result, passive funds have attracted more annual investor money than active funds for the past nine years, according to Morningstar.
“It’s been a rough couple decades for actively managed mutual funds,” said Jared Woodard, an investment and ETF strategist at Bank of America Securities.

But, for investors who prefer active management — especially in more niche corners of the investment market — active ETFs often have a cost advantage versus active mutual funds, experts said.
That’s mostly by virtue of lower fees and tax efficiency, experts said.
ETFs generally carry lower fund fees than mutual fund counterparts, and generate annual tax bills for investors with much less frequency, Armour said.
In 2023, 4% of ETFs distributed capital gains to investors versus 65% of mutual funds, he said.

Such cost advantages have helped lift ETFs overall. ETF market share relative to mutual fund assets has more than doubled over the past decade.
That said, active ETFs represent just 8% of overall ETF assets and 35% of annual ETF inflows, Armour said.
“They are a tiny portion of active net assets but growing rapidly at a time when active mutual funds have seen pretty significant outflows,” he said. “So, it is a big story.”

Converting mutual funds to ETFs

In fact, many money managers have converted their active mutual funds into ETFs, following a 2019 rule from the Securities and Exchange Commission that allowed for such activity, experts said.
So far, 121 active mutual funds have become active ETFs, according to a Nov. 18 Bank of America Securities research note.
Such conversions “can stem the tide of outflows and attract new capital,” according to the Bank of America note. “Two years before converting, the average fund saw $150 [million] in outflows. After converting, the average fund gained $500 [million] of inflows.”
That said, there are caveats for investors.
For one, investors who want an active ETF are unlikely to have access to one within their workplace retirement plan, Armour said.
ETFs, unlike mutual funds, are unable to close to new investors, Armour said.
This may put investors at a disadvantage in ETFs with certain “super niche, concentrated” investment strategies, because money managers may not be able to execute the strategy as well as the ETF gets more investors, he said. More

President-elect Donald Trump picked Kevin Hassett to lead the National Economic Council.
The move brings Trump closer to rounding out his economic team, with U.S. trade representative being the last of the key positions left.
Trump made the announcement in a post on Truth Social.

White House Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Kevin Hassett addresses reporters during the daily briefing at the White House in Washington, U.S. February 22, 2018.
Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

President-elect Donald Trump picked Kevin Hassett to lead the National Economic Council, a role that puts him at the center of the administration’s policy-making discussions from trade to taxes and deregulation.
The move brings Trump closer to rounding out his economic team, with U.S. trade representative being the last of the key positions left.Trump made the announcement in a post on Truth Social.Trump also tapped attorney Jamieson Greer on Tuesday to serve as the U.S. Trade Representative.

During Trump’s first administration, Hassett served as the chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers for two years, supporting the Republican’s corporate tax cuts and defending Trump’s punitive tariffs.
The 62-year-old Hassett also worked with Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner on immigration and backed a move to end waivers of sanctions for countries that buy Iranian oil.
The appointment came as Trump renewed his vow to raise tariffs by an additional 10% on all Chinese goods coming into the U.S. and impose tariffs of 25% on all products from Mexico and Canada. Such a move would end a regional free trade agreement.
Trump is set to be inaugurated as the next U.S. president on Jan. 20. He cited illegal immigration and illicit drug trade as reasons for the tariffs.
Hassett previously served as a scholar of fiscal policy at the conservative American Enterprise Institute think tank before Trump nominated him to the White House role in 2017.
Late last week, Trump signaled his intention to nominate Scott Bessent, founder of hedge fund Key Square Group and a seasoned market pro, as his Treasury secretary. More

Databricks is in the middle of a mega funding round, several people familiar with the matter told CNBC. 
The data analytics and AI company is raising at least $5 billion in cash, pegging its new valuation at $55 billion, according to the sources.
The software company is already one of Silicon Valley’s most valuable private startups and has been viewed as a potential IPO candidate.
But this funding round pushes its public debut prospects further down the road, one source told CNBC. 

Ali Ghodsi, co-founder and chief executive officer of Databricks Inc., speaks during a Bloomberg Technology television interview in San Francisco on Oct. 22, 2019.
David Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Images

One of the world’s most valuable private tech companies is raising billions more in cash and is in no rush to go public, sources told CNBC. 
San Francisco-based Databricks is raising at least another $5 billion in its latest funding round, though it could raise up to $8 billion given the round is ongoing, according to several people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be named because the discussions were private. The latest raise would value the company at $55 billion and could top the largest round of the year, by OpenAI.

The latest funding is designed to help Databricks employees sell shares, one of the people said. Reducing pressure from employees to cash out also reduces the need for a liquidity event such as an IPO. One source said the funding round makes Databricks’ highly anticipated public debut less urgent. But it could still happen in the back half of next year.
Databricks was founded in 2013 and sells software that helps enterprises organize data and build their own generative AI products. It uses machine learning to help clients from AT&T to Walgreens parse and make sense of massive troves of data. 
This equity round could be the largest in a banner year for artificial intelligence funding, when 1 in 3 venture dollars has gone to an AI startup, according to CB Insights. OpenAI holds the record in 2024, raising $6.6 billion in October at a $157 billion valuation.
Databricks last raised $500 million at a $43 billion valuation. It’s backed by Nvidia, Capital One, Andreessen Horowitz, Baillie Gifford, Fidelity, Insight Partners, Tiger Global and others. 
The Information first reported that Databricks was raising money.

The firm has capitalized on the momentum in artificial intelligence. This summer, it acquired MosaicML, a $1.3 billion software startup that focuses on large language models that can churn out natural-sounding text. Databricks told investors earlier this year that annualized revenue would hit $2.4 billion by the midpoint of 2024.
Its decision to stay private comes as software stocks have struggled to get out of a rut brought on by higher interest rates. Shares of rival Snowflake are down 13% this year. While its fellow software IPO candidates such as Stripe have taken significant haircuts on valuations, Databricks has grown its value while expanding its employee base. 
CEO Ali Ghodsi said at a conference Nov. 20 that he’s optimizing for the success of Databricks over the next decade or two, not optimizing for an IPO.
“If we were going to go, the earliest would be, let’s say, mid-next year, or something like that,” Ghodsi said at Newcomer’s Cerebral Valley AI Conference. “So, you know, could happen next year.”
A Databricks spokesperson declined to comment.
Correction: OpenAI raised $6.6 billion in October at a $157 billion valuation. A previous version of this article misstated the valuation amount. More

Federal Reserve officials expressed confidence that inflation is easing and the labor market is strong, allowing for further interest rate cuts albeit at a gradual pace, according to minutes from the November meeting released Tuesday.
The meeting summary contained multiple statements indicating that officials are comfortable with the pace of inflation, even though by most measures it remains above the Fed’s 2% goal.

With that in mind, and with conviction that the jobs picture is still fairly solid, Federal Open Market Committee members indicated that further rate cuts likely will happen, though they did not specify when and to what degree.
“In discussing the outlook for monetary policy, participants anticipated that if the data came in aboutas expected, with inflation continuing to move down sustainably to 2 percent and the economyremaining near maximum employment, it would likely be appropriate to move gradually toward a more neutral stance of policy over time,” the minutes said.
The FOMC voted unanimously at the meeting to take down its benchmark borrowing rate by a quarter percentage point to a target range of 4.5%-4.75%. Markets expect the Fed could cut again in December, though conviction has waned among concerns that President-elect Donald Trump’s plans for tariffs could stoke inflation higher.
The meeting concluded two days after the contentious presidential election campaign resulted in the Republican emerging as the victor and set to begin serving his second term in January.There was no mention of the election in the minutes, save for a staff notation that stock market volatility rose before the Nov. 5 results and fell after. There also was no discussion of the implications of fiscal policy, despite anticipation that Trump’s plans, which also include lower taxes and aggressive deregulation, could have substantial economic impacts.
However, members did note a general level of uncertainty about how conditions are evolving. In addition, they expressed uncertainty over where the rate cuts would need to stop before the Fed hit a “neutral” interest rate that neither boosts nor restrains growth.

“Many participants observed that uncertainties concerning the level of the neutral rate of interest complicated the assessment of the degree of restrictiveness of monetary policy and, in their view, made it appropriate to reduce policy restraint gradually,” the minutes said.
Conflicting signals on inflation and the uncertainty over Trump’s policies have caused traders to scale back their outlook for interest rate cuts ahead. The market-implied probability of a rate trim in December has drifted below 60%, with an expectation of just three-quarters of a percentage point in reductions through the end of the 2025.
Committee members appeared to spend much of the meeting talking about progress on inflation and a generally stable economic outlook.
Policymakers in recent days have expressed confidence that current inflation readings are being boosted by shelter cost increases that are expected to slow as the pace of rent rises eases and makes its way through the data.
“Almost all participants judged that, though month-to-month movements would remain volatile, incoming data generally remained consistent with inflation returning sustainably to 2 percent,” the document said.”Participants cited various factors likely to put continuing downward pressure on inflation, including waning business pricing power, the Committee’s still-restrictive monetary policy stance, and well-anchored longer-term inflation expectations,” it added.
Policymakers had been expressing concern about the labor market. Nonfarm payrolls rose only 12,000 in October, though the meager gain has been attributed primarily to storms in the Southeast and labor strikes.
Officials indicated that the state of the labor market is generally solid.
“Participants generally noted … that there was no sign of rapid deterioration in labor market conditions, with layoffs remaining low,” the minutes said.

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

FA Playbook

President-elect Donald Trump’s policy agenda, from tariffs to deregulation, carries risks and rewards for different investment sectors, market experts said.
Here are the big factors that may impact autos, banks, building materials and construction, crypto, energy, health care, retail, and technology.

President-elect Donald Trump at a viewing of a test-flight launch of the SpaceX Starship rocket in Brownsville, Texas, Nov. 19, 2024.
Brandon Bell | Getty Images News | Getty Images

As Inauguration Day nears, investors are trying to unravel what booms or busts lay ahead under President-elect Donald Trump.
Trump’s campaign promises — from tariffs to mass deportations, tax cuts and deregulation — and his picks to lead federal agencies suggest both risks and rewards for various investment sectors, according to market experts.  

Republican control of both chambers of Congress may grant Trump greater leeway to enact his pledges, experts said. However, their scope and timing is far from clear.

More from FA Playbook:

Here’s a look at other stories impacting the financial advisor business.

“There’s so much uncertainty right now,” said Jeremy Goldberg, a certified financial planner, portfolio manager and research analyst at Professional Advisory Services, which ranked No. 37 on CNBC’s annual Financial Advisor 100 list.
“I wouldn’t be making large bets one way or another,” Goldberg said.

Sectors often fare differently than expected

Past market results show why it’s difficult to predict the sectors that may win or lose under a new president, according to Larry Adam, chief investment officer at Raymond James.
When Trump was elected in 2016, financials, industrials and energy outperformed the S&P 500 in the first week. However, for the remaining three years and 51 weeks, those same sectors significantly underperformed, Adam said.

“The market is known to have these knee-jerk reactions trying to anticipate where things go very quickly, but they don’t necessarily last,” Adam said.

What’s more, sectors that are expected to do well or badly based on a president’s policies have sometimes gone the opposite way, according to Adam.
For example, the energy sector was down by 8.4% during Trump’s first administration, despite deregulation, record oil production and a rise in oil prices. Yet the energy sector climbed 22.9% under Biden as of Nov. 19, despite the administration’s push for renewables and sustainability.
For that reason, Raymond James ranks politics eighth for its potential impact on sectors. The seven factors that have more influence, according to the firm, are economic growth, fundamentals, monetary policy, interest rates and inflation, valuations, sentiment and corporate activity.
Here’s how Trump’s policy stances could influence eight sectors: autos, banks, building materials and construction, cryptocurrency, energy, health care, retail and technology.

Automobiles

Monty Rakusen | Digitalvision | Getty Images

The auto sector — like many others — will likely be a mixed bag, experts said.
Trump’s antipathy for electric vehicles is likely to create headwinds for EV producers.
His administration may try to roll back regulations such as a Biden-era tailpipe-emissions rule expected to push broader adoption of EVs and hybrids. He also intends to kill consumer EV tax credits worth up to $7,500 — although states such as California may try to enact their own EV rebates, blunting the impact.
Losing the federal credit would make EVs more costly, driving down sales and perhaps making “per unit economics even less favorable” for automakers, John Murphy, a research analyst at Bank of America Securities, wrote in a Nov. 21 research note.
Some companies seem well-positioned, though: Ford Motor, for example, “has a healthy pipeline of hybrid vehicles as well as traditional [internal combustion engine] vehicles to supplement the EV offerings,” Murphy wrote.

Tariffs and trade conflict pose threats to the auto industry, since the U.S. relies heavily on other nations to manufacture cars and parts, said Callie Cox, chief market strategist at Ritholtz Wealth Management.
They “could affect the cost and availability of cars we see in the U.S. market,” Cox said.
Economists expect tariffs and other Trump policies to be inflationary.
In that case, the Federal Reserve may have to keep interest rates higher for longer than anticipated. Higher borrowing costs may weigh on consumers’ desire or ability to buy cars, Cox said.
However, lower EV production could be a boon for companies that manufacture traditional gasoline cars, experts said.
Trump has also called for a “drill, baby, drill” approach to oil production. Greater supply could reduce gas prices, supporting demand for gas vehicles, experts said. But trade wars and sanctions on Iran and Venezuela could have the opposite impact, too.
— Greg Iacurci

Banks

President Donald Trump stands next to JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, left, in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, Feb. 3, 2017.
Andrew Harrer | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Trump’s first administration eased certain regulations for banking rules, fintech firms and financial startups.
Likewise, Trump’s second term is expected to usher in lighter financial regulations.
That may help bolster profitability in the sector, and therefore stock prices, said Brian Spinelli, co-chief investment officer at Halbert Hargrove in Long Beach, California, which is No. 54 on the 2024 CNBC FA 100 list.
“The larger banks probably benefit more from that,” Spinelli said.
Less regulation — combined with the prospect that interest rates could stay higher — will provide a net positive for the bank industry, since banks may be able to lend out more risk-based capital, said David Rea, president of Salem Investment Counselors in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, which is No. 8 on the 2024 CNBC FA 100 list.
One issue that emerged this year that could resurface is concern about regional banks’ exposure to commercial real estate, Spinelli said.
“It wasn’t that long ago, and I don’t think those problems disappeared,” Spinelli said. “So you question, is that still looming out there?”
— Lorie Konish

Building materials and construction

Bill Varie | The Image Bank | Getty Images

The housing market has been “frozen” in recent years by high mortgage rates, said Cox, of Ritholtz.
Lower rates would likely be a “catalyst” for housing and associated companies, she said.
However, that may not materialize — quickly, at least — under Trump, she said. If policies such as tariffs, tax cuts and mass deportations stoke inflation, the Federal Reserve may have to keep interest rates higher for longer than anticipated, which would likely prop up mortgage rates and weigh on housing and related sectors, she said.
The whims of the housing market affect retailers, too: Home goods stores may not fare well if people aren’t buying, renovating and decorating new homes, Cox said.

That said, deregulation could be “absolutely huge” for the sector if it accelerates building timelines and reduces costs for developers, Goldberg said.
Trump has called for opening public land to builders and creating tax incentives for homebuyers, without providing much detail.
Housing policy will be “one of the most-watched initiatives coming out of the next administration,” Cox said. “We haven’t gotten a lot of clarity on that front.”
“If we see realistic and well-thought-out policies, you could see real estate stocks and related stocks” such as real estate investment trusts, home improvement retailers and home builders respond well, Cox said.
— Greg Iacurci

Crypto

Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump gestures at the Bitcoin 2024 event in Nashville, Tennessee, U.S., July 27, 2024.
Kevin Wurm | Reuters

Trump’s election has brought a new bullishness to cryptocurrencies, with bitcoin nearing a new $100,000 benchmark before its recent runup ended.
As president, Trump is expected to embrace crypto more than any of his predecessors.
Notably, he has already launched a crypto platform, World Liberty Financial, that will encourage the use of digital coins.
Those developments come as new ways of investing in crypto have emerged this year, with the January launch of spot bitcoin ETFs, and more recently, the addition of bitcoin ETF options.
Yet financial advisors are hesitant, with only about 2.6% recommending crypto to their clients, an April survey from Cerulli Associates found. Roughly 12.1% said they would be willing to use it or discuss it based on the client’s preference. Still, 58.9% of advisors said they do not expect to ever use cryptocurrency with clients.
“The No. 1 reason why advisors aren’t investing in cryptocurrency on behalf of their clients is they don’t believe it’s suitable for client portfolios,” said Matt Apkarian, associate director in Cerulli’s product development practice.

Even for advisors who do expect they may use crypto at some point, it’s “wait and see,” particularly regarding how the regulatory environment plays out, Apkarian said.
However, investors are showing interest in cryptocurrency, with 90% of advisors receiving questions on the subject, according to research from Christina Lynn, a certified financial planner and practice management consultant at Mariner Wealth Advisors.
For those investors, exchange-traded funds are a good starting place, Lynn said, since there’s less chance of falling victim to one of crypto’s pitfalls such as scams or losing the keys, the unique alphanumeric codes attached to the investments. Because crypto can be more volatile, it’s best not to invest any money you expect you’ll need to pay for near-term goals, she said.
Investors would also be wise to think of cryptocurrency like an alternative investment and limit the allocation to 1% to 5% of their overall portfolio, Lynn said.
“You don’t need to have a lot of this to have it go a long way,” Lynn said.
— Lorie Konish

Energy

President Donald Trump gestures after delivering a speech at a Double Eagle Energy Holdings LLC oil rig in Midland, Texas, July 29, 2020.
Cooper Neill | Bloomberg | Getty Images

As of Nov. 19, energy has been the top-performing sector under President Joe Biden, with a 22.9% gain, even with the administration’s push for renewables and sustainability, according to Raymond James.
Yet it remains to be seen whether that performance can continue under Trump, who has advocated for more oil, gas and coal production. The outlook for the sector could change if Trump acts on a campaign threat to repeal the Inflation Reduction Act, a law enacted under Biden that includes clean energy incentives.
If Trump continues to make it easier to create more oil supply, that might not be a great thing for oil companies, according to Adam, of Raymond James.
“Because there’s more supply, it may tamp down on the price of oil, and that’s one of the biggest drivers of that sector,” Adam said.
Eagle Global Advisors, a Houston-based investment management firm that specializes in energy infrastructure, is “cautiously optimistic” about Trump’s impact on the sector, according to portfolio manager Mike Cerasoli. Eagle Global Advisors is No. 35 on the 2024 CNBC FA 100 list.
“We would say we’re probably more on the optimistic side than the cautious side,” Cerasoli said. “But if we know anything about Trump it’s that he’s a wild card.”

A lot of the Inflation Reduction Act may stay intact, since the top states that benefited financially from the law also handed Trump a victory in the election, according to Cerasoli.
When Biden won in 2020, there was a lot of panic about the outlook for energy, oil and gas. Cerasoli recalls writing in a third-quarter letter that year, “I don’t think it’s going to be as bad as you think.”
Four years later, he has the same message for investors on the outlook for renewables. In the days following Trump’s inauguration, Cerasoli expects there may be a deluge of executive orders.
“Once you get past that, you’ll get a sense of exactly how he’s going to treat energy,” Cerasoli said. “I think people will realize that it’s not the end of the world for renewables.”
— Lorie Konish

Health care

Medicine vials on a production line.
Comezora | Moment | Getty Images

Trump nominated Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as head of the Department of Health and Human Services.
RFK would be a “huge wild card” for the health-care sector if the U.S. Senate were to confirm him, said Goldberg, of Professional Advisory Services.
RFK is a prominent vaccine skeptic, which may bode ill for big vaccine makers such as Merck, Pfizer and Moderna, said David Weinstein, a portfolio manager and senior vice president at Dana Investment Advisors, No. 4 on CNBC’s annual FA 100 ranking.
Cuts to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, are also likely on the table to reduce government spending and raise money for a tax-cut package, experts said.
Publicly traded health companies such as Centene, HCA Healthcare and UnitedHealth might be affected by lower volumes of Medicaid patients or consumers who face higher health-care premiums after losing ACA subsidies, for example, Weinstein said.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. during the UFC 309 event at Madison Square Garden in New York City, Nov. 16, 2024.
Chris Unger | Ufc | Getty Images

Medical tech providers — especially those that supply electronics with semiconductors sourced from China — could be burdened by tariffs, he added.
Conversely, deregulation might help certain pharmaceutical companies such as Thermo Fisher Scientific and Charles River Laboratories, which may benefit from faster approvals from the Food and Drug Administration, Goldberg said.
Vivek Ramaswamy, a former biotech executive whom Trump appointed as co-head of a new advisory panel called the “Department of Government Efficiency,” has called for streamlined drug approvals. But Kennedy has advocated for more oversight.
“There’s a real dichotomy here,” Weinstein said.
“Where do we end up? Maybe where we are right now,” he added.
— Greg Iacurci

Retail

Thomas Barwick | Digitalvision | Getty Images

Tax cuts may boost consumers’ discretionary income, which would be a boon for companies selling consumer electronics, clothes, luxury goods and other items, Goldberg said.
Then again, there’s a “high probability” of tariffs, Weinstein said.
Retailers would likely pass on at least some of that additional cost to consumers, experts said.
All physical goods, from apparel to footwear, tools and appliances are at risk from tariffs, Weinstein said. Tariff impact would depend on how the policies are structured.
Home Depot, Lowe’s and Walmart, for example, source a relatively big chunk of their goods from abroad, Weinstein said.

Home Depot CEO and President Ted Decker said Nov. 12 during the firm’s third-quarter earnings call that the company sources more than half its goods from the U.S. and North America, but “there certainly will be an impact.”
“Whatever happens in tariffs will be an industrywide impact,” Decker said. “It won’t discriminate against different retailers and distributors who are importing goods.”
It’s a good idea for investors to own “high quality” retailers without a lot of debt and with diversified inventory sources, Goldberg said. He cited TJX Companies, which owns stores including TJ Maxx, Marshalls and HomeGoods, as an example.
“Direct imports are a small portion of [its] business and TJX sources from a variety of countries outside of China,” Lorraine Hutchinson, a Bank of America Securities research analyst, wrote in a Nov. 21 note.
Deregulation may be positive for smaller retailers and franchises, which tend to be more sensitive to labor laws and environmental and compliance costs, Goldberg said.
— Greg Iacurci

Technology

Former President Donald J. Trump speaks about filing class-action lawsuits targeting Facebook, Google and Twitter and their CEOs, escalating his long-running battle with the companies following their suspensions of his social media accounts, during a press conference at the Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey, July 07, 2021.
Jabin Botsford | The Washington Post | Getty Images

The technology sector continued its strong run in 2024, thanks in large part to the Magnificent Seven — Amazon, Apple, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla.
Even broadly diversified investors may find it difficult to escape those names, as they are among the top weighted companies in the S&P 500 index.
Information technology — which includes all those stocks except Amazon and Google parent Alphabet — comprises the largest sector in the S&P 500 index, with more than 31%.
Trump is poised to have an influence on looming antitrust issues, amid considerations as to whether Google’s influence on online search should be limited.
Any tariffs put in place may also prompt some sales to decline or the cost of raw materials to go up, said Rea of Salem Investment Counselors.
Nevertheless, Rea said his firm continues to have a “pretty heavy” tech allocation, with strong expectations for generative artificial intelligence. However, the firm does not own Tesla, due to its expensive valuation, and has recently been selling software company Palantir, a winning stock that may have gotten ahead of itself, he said.
Technology valuations are trading well into the high double digits on a price-to-earnings basis, which often signals forward returns will decline, according to Halbert Hargrove’s Spinelli.
Consequently, prospective investors who come in now would basically be buying high, he said.
“If you think you’re going to get the same double-digit returns in the next five years, sure, it could happen on a one-year basis,” Spinelli said. “But your chances historically have been that your returns come down.”
— Lorie Konish More