More stories

  • in

    Boeing delivers most airplanes since late 2023 after ramping up 737 Max output

    Boeing delivered 60 airplanes in June, the most since December 2023, weeks before a door plug blew out midair.
    The manufacturer handed over 150 planes to customers in the second quarter, the best for that period since 2018.
    The company has been working to stabilize its production lines and increase output.

    Boeing 737 MAX airliners are pictured at the company’s factory in Renton, Washington, on Sept. 12, 2024.
    Stephen Brashear | AP

    Boeing delivered 60 airplanes last month, the most since December 2023, as the plane maker seeks to raise production of its bestselling 737 Max jets after a series of manufacturing and safety problems.
    The tally was the highest since before a door plug from one of its new 737 Max 9 planes blew out midair in January 2024, sparking a new crisis for the company and slowing production and deliveries of aircraft. Of the monthly total, 42 were 737 Maxes, going to customers including Southwest Airlines, Alaska Airlines and United Airlines.

    CEO Kelly Ortberg, who took the top job at Boeing last August, has said the company has made progress in improving production rates and quality on its factory lines.
    For the three months ended June 30, Boeing handed over 150 airplanes, its best second quarter since 2018, before two crashes of Max planes five months apart grounded the jets and sparked a multiyear crisis at the top U.S. exporter. That was also the last year Boeing posted an annual profit. Its problems also gave rival Airbus a bigger lead over Boeing.
    Boeing this spring had been producing about 38 Max aircraft a month and will need Federal Aviation Administration approval to go above that limit, which the agency set after the door plug accident. Ortberg said at a Bernstein investor conference in late May that he’s confident that the company could increase production to 42 of the jets a month.

    Read more CNBC airline news

    The company booked 116 gross orders in June, or 70 net orders when including cancellations and accounting adjustments. Boeing often removes or adds orders to its backlog for a variety of reasons including customers’ financial health.
    Boeing’s backlog stood at 5,953 as of June 30.
    The manufacturer is set to report second-quarter financial results on July 29, when investors will be focused on Ortberg’s plan to increase production and aircraft deliveries.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Robinhood CEO downplays OpenAI concerns on tokenized stock structure

    In a CNBC interview Tuesday, Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev defended the company’s OpenAI and SpaceX stock tokens, given concerns over how they’re structured.
    Last week, OpenAI issued a warning that Robinhood’s stock tokens do not represent equity in the company.
    “In and of itself, I don’t think it’s entirely relevant that it’s not technically an equity instrument,” Tenev said.

    Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev says it’s not “entirely relevant” that the trading platform’s so-called tokenized shares of OpenAI and SpaceX aren’t technically equity in the companies.
    It comes after OpenAI raised concerns about the product, which is designed to give users in the European Union exposure to various U.S. stocks — including private companies, which are less liquid than publicly listed firms.

    OpenAI last week warned that Robinhood’s stock tokens do not represent equity in the company and said in a post on X that, “any transfer of OpenAI equity requires our approval — we did not approve any transfer.”
    Robinhood says its OpenAI stock tokens are “enabled by Robinhood’s ownership stake in a special purpose vehicle.”
    “It is true that these are not technically equity,” Tenev, who co-founded Robinhood in 2013 with fellow entrepreneur Baiju Bhatt, told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe” Tuesday, echoing his initial response to OpenAI’s concerns.

    Tenev said that OpenAI’s complex company structure enables institutional investors to gain exposure to the company through “various instruments, like equity upon the event of a conversion to a for-profit at a later date.”
    OpenAI was initially founded as a non-profit organization. However, it has since evolved to include a for-profit entity, which is owned by the non-profit.

    “In and of itself, I don’t think it’s entirely relevant that it’s not technically an equity instrument,” he said. “What’s important is that retail customers have an opportunity to get exposure to this asset” — even if it’s a private company — due to the disruptive nature of AI, he added.

    Read more CNBC tech news

    On Monday, the Bank of Lithuania, which is Robinhood’s lead authority in the European Union, told CNBC it was “awaiting clarifications” regarding the structure of the company’s stock tokens following OpenAI’s statement last week.
    “Only after receiving and evaluating this information will we be able to assess the legality and compliance of these specific instruments,” Bank of Lithuania spokesman Giedrius Šniukas told CNBC. “The information for investors must be provided in clear, fair, and non-misleading language.”
    Tenev said in response to the Lithuanian regulator’s comments that Robinhood is “happy to continue to answer questions from our regulators.”
    “Since this is a new thing, regulators are going to want to look at it, and we’ve built this program in a way that we believe will withstand scrutiny — and we expect to be scrutinized as a large, innovative player in this space,” he told CNBC. More

  • in

    The great dealmaker is conspicuously short of trade deals

    The world’s trading system is now a reality-TV show. “We invite you to participate in the extraordinary Economy of the United States, the Number One Market in the World,” President Donald Trump proclaimed in letters dispatched to many of America’s partners on July 7th. Then he threatened them with tariffs set to take effect on August 1st: 25% for Japan and South Korea, 32% for Indonesia and 36% Thailand. More

  • in

    ‘F1’ is Apple’s highest-grossing theatrical film ever

    Apple’s “F1: The Movie” has generated more than $293 million at the global box office, the most of any film released theatrically by the company.
    “F1” has generated $60 million of its total global haul from IMAX theaters, a little more than 20% of its total gross so far.
    While the film is nearing $300 million in global ticket sales, it still has a few more laps to go in order to be profitable for Apple.

    Still from Apple’s “F1.”

    Lights out and away we go.
    “F1: The Movie” hasn’t even reached the checkered flag of its theatrical run, but it’s already Apple’s best film release ever.

    The film, distributed by Warner Bros. Discovery, zoomed past $293 million at the global box office over the weekend. This outpaced Ridley Scott’s “Napoleon,” which generated $221 million during its run in 2023, to become Apple’s highest-grossing theatrical release.
    The tech company has only sent a handful of films to cinemas with wide releases since delving into the media business in recent years. “Killers of the Flower Moon” tallied $158 million worldwide, “Fly Me to the Moon” took in just $42 million and “Argylle” generated $96 million in ticket sales globally.
    “‘F1’ is an extremely important movie for Apple and for the industry at large,” said Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst at Comscore. “It’s a perfect test case for how a streaming service can develop a film that’s tailormade for the big screen while simultaneously promoting the film across the millions of small screens that their technological footprint puts directly in front of their subscribers.”
    “F1” has benefited greatly from its partnership with IMAX. Before production, Apple and the film’s top creatives reached out to not only secure the use of IMAX’s camera technology, but also a three-week release in its theaters.
    In fact, the “F1” deal meant that Universal’s “Jurassic World Rebirth” didn’t get a domestic IMAX release and was only featured on IMAX screens in China. That film will also appear in IMAX screens in Japan next month.

    “F1” has generated $60 million of its total global haul from IMAX theaters, a little more than 20% of its total gross so far. Domestically, the film has generated $27.4 million in ticket sales through IMAX screenings, about 25% of the film’s ticket sales in the U.S. and Canada.
    While the film is nearing $300 million in global ticket sales, it still has a few more laps to go in order to be profitable for Apple. The movie cost between $200 million and $300 million to make, according to reports, and an estimated $100 million to market. The studio is also splitting receipts with Warner Bros. and theaters.
    “Naturally, a mega budget movie like ‘F1’ can have a rather long road to profitability given the various revenue splits with movie theaters and Warner Bros. as well, but Apple has the resources to and the cash reserves to take on that risk,” said Dergarabedian.
    For Apple, success looks very different than for traditional studios. Entertainment isn’t the company’s main revenue driver — not even close. Apple has a $3 trillion market cap and generates most of its revenue from its suite of tech devices.
    And Apple isn’t just spending money on movies and television products to try and fuel sales of its phones, TVs and computers.
    “We got into this business because we thought it would be a good business,” Apple services chief Eddy Cue said in a recent Bloomberg interview. “And in order to continue to do great things, you need businesses to be profitable.”
    Apple has gained momentum in the pop culture space with shows like “Ted Lasso,” “Severance” and “The Studio” and was the first streamer to win the best picture award at the Oscars for 2021’s “Coda.”

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

    Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal and CNBC. More

  • in

    BlackRock keeps its foot on the private-markets pedal with another acquisition

    BlackRock’s new acquisition pushes the asset manager one step deeper into private markets. The news The asset management giant on Monday announced an agreement to buy ElmTree Funds, a real estate investment firm that manages roughly $7.3 billion in assets. ElmTree, which leases commercial properties to single-tenant renters, will be integrated into BlackRock’s new group called Private Financing Solutions. The PFS unit is home to private credit manager HPS Investment Partners, which officially became part of BlackRock last week following the closure of the $12 billion acquisition . “Our specialized bricks-and-mortar expertise will be augmented by HPS’s ability to provide financing and other solutions that fuel the corporations and developers driving the economy forward,” ElmTree founder and CEO James Koman said in a statement. HPS CEO Scott Kapnick added that, “Structural shifts in the real estate sector are creating new opportunities for private capital.” The acquisition is expected to close in the third quarter of 2025 and is subject to regulatory approval. BlackRock shares rose modestly Monday, hitting an intraday record high of almost $1,087 apiece, following the news. The stock was bucking the broader market, which dropped Monday after finishing last week at a record. Big picture This is BlackRock’s latest attempt to broaden its portfolio of private assets, one of the hottest areas of finance. For years, BlackRock has been known for its popular index business, which manages trillions of dollars and makes up a significant portion of its revenues. The firm has profited immensely as an industry leader for ETFs through its iShares family of funds, but management has been trying to reinvent BlackRock and diversify its revenues into other areas. Deals have been a big part of that. The company has spent over $28 billion on private-markets acquisitions since the start of 2024. In addition to HPS, BlackRock also bought alternatives data provider Preqin and infrastructure investment firm Global Infrastructure Partners . With HPS now finalized, all three firms are now part of BlackRock. During BlackRock’s investor day, President Rob Kapito described 2024 as one of the most “transformative” periods in the firm’s history. He also struck an optimistic tone about its future growth drivers such as private markets. “The best of BlackRock is still ahead of us,” Kapito told investors in June. By 2030, BlackRock aims for its private markets and technology businesses to account for at least 30% of its revenue, up from less than a fifth at the end of last year. BLK YTD mountain BlackRock (BLK) year-to-date performance Bottom line Acquiring ElmTree Funds isn’t a needle-moving deal for BlackRock’s bottom line yet — but we like what it says about the firm’s strategic focus. Consider: BlackRock manages over $11.5 trillion in assets, compared to ElmTree’s $7.3 billion in assets. (On the flip side, that means we’re not worried about any dilution from the all-stock deal either, given the size of the transaction.) Nevertheless, the venture underscores management’s push into the fast-growing world of private markets and, in particular, targets commercial real estate. We like the private market expansion because it diversifies BlackRock’s revenue streams further. It will be nice to see when BlackRock’s not quite as reliant on its ETF business, which is heavily influenced by stock market’s volatility. There are already signs that its other acquisitions are starting to pay off. Preqin, for example, added around $20 million to revenue in the first quarter of 2025 — in less than a month of ownership — and contributed to BlackRock’s 30% year-over-year increase in annual contract values. Investors will get an updated look at Preqin’s performance and BlackRock as a whole on July 15, when the asset manager reports second-quarter earnings before the opening bell. (Jim Cramer’s Charitable Trust is long BLK. See here for a full list of the stocks.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust’s portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED. More

  • in

    Robinhood stock tokens face scrutiny in the European Union after OpenAI warning

    The Bank of Lithuania, Robinhood’s lead EU regulator, said it is “awaiting clarifications” regarding the structure of the company’s OpenAI and SpaceX stock tokens.
    Robinhood says its stock tokens give users the ability to invest in shares in the form of blockchain-based tokens.
    However, following the product’s launch last week, OpenAI warned users that “these ‘OpenAI tokens’ are not OpenAI equity.”

    Avishek Das | SOPA Images | Lightrocket | Getty Images

    Lithuania’s central bank on Monday said it has contacted Robinhood seeking clarifications over its tokenized equities after OpenAI raised concerns over the product last week.
    “We have contacted Robinhood and are awaiting clarifications regarding the structure of OpenAI and SpaceX stock tokens as well as the related consumer communication,” Bank of Lithuania spokesman Giedrius Šniukas told CNBC via email.

    “Only after receiving and evaluating this information will we be able to assess the legality and compliance of these specific instruments. The information for investors must be provided in clear, fair, and non-misleading language.”
    The Bank of Lithuania is Robinhood’s lead regulator in the European Union after the company received a brokerage license and crypto asset service provider license from the central bank. Robinhood was not immediately available for comment when contacted by CNBC.

    It comes shortly after OpenAI distanced itself from Robinhood’s “Stock Tokens” product. Launched on June 30, the product gives users in the EU the ability to invest in shares in the form of blockchain-based tokens, according to Robinhood — even for privately held firms like OpenAI and SpaceX.
    Following Robinhood’s announcement of the new token offering, OpenAI took to social media platform X to warn users that “these ‘OpenAI tokens’ are not OpenAI equity.”
    “We did not partner with Robinhood, were not involved in this, and do not endorse it,” the company said at the time, adding “any transfer of OpenAI equity requires our approval — we did not approve any transfer” and urging users to approach the product with caution.
    In response to OpenAI’s warning last week, Robinhood had said that its stock tokens “give retail investors indirect exposure to private markets, opening up access, and are enabled by Robinhood’s ownership stake in a special purpose vehicle.” More

  • in

    How Netflix keeps luring big-name directors away from the traditional box office

    Directors who have made their mark with theatrical releases — like Greta Gerwig, Rian Johnson, Martin Scorsese and Alfonso Cuarón — are also making content exclusively for Netflix.
    The streamer offers lucrative contracts, creative freedom and an audience pool of more than 300 million subscribers, Hollywood insiders told CNBC.
    Success of a Netflix film is based on viewership, a metric that is not comparable to box-office dollars, but the company has had at least one best picture contender at the Academy Awards since 2019.

    Film directors Rian Johnson (L), Greta Gerwig (C), and Guillermo Del Toro (R)
    Getty Images

    Netflix isn’t interested in bringing movies to theaters.
    The company’s leaders have said they see theatrical movie releases as an “outdated” model. Yet for more than a decade, the streamer has lured in some of Hollywood’s biggest directors to make content exclusively for its platform.

    Martin Scorsese, Alfonso Cuarón, Bong Joon-ho, Spike Lee and Guillermo del Toro, darlings of the big screen, have all directed films for the streaming service without the promise of a wide theatrical release.
    More recently, Netflix has wooed Greta Gerwig into the director’s seat after acquiring the rights to C.S. Lewis’ “The Chronicles of Narnia” book series, signed Rian Johnson to make two sequels to 2019’s “Knives Out” and made itself the home of Kathryn Bigelow’s first film release in nearly a decade.
    Many of these creatives have touted the importance of the theatrical experience, but few of the Netflix projects are expected to garner a wide release or a long run in cinemas. Most of the time, Netflix’s films are launched in a limited number of theaters for a week, just long enough to be eligible for Academy Award contention.
    In fact, Gerwig’s “Narnia” film is getting an exclusive two-week global debut in IMAX starting Thanksgiving Day 2026, something that has never been done before.

    Daniel Craig returns as Benoit Blanc in “Glass Onion: A Knives Out Story.”

    Netflix has been able to bring Hollywood talent away from the traditional theatrical model by offering lucrative contracts, creative freedom and an audience pool of more than 300 million subscribers, Hollywood insiders, who requested anonymity to discuss industry moves, told CNBC. It’s also become a haven for auteurs whose films might not otherwise get made, either because of pricey budgets or risky genres.

    “What Netflix offers filmmakers is an irresistible combination of deep financial pockets and wide creative latitude,” said Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst at Comscore. “This is enough to draw some of the biggest names in filmmaking today both behind and in front of the camera, and it’s striking since most of these notable names have built their careers on the canvas of the big screen in the movie theater.”

    Why not theatrical?

    For as long as Netflix has been disrupting the traditional Hollywood model, analysts and box-office proponents have argued for why the streamer should embrace a more conventional theatrical approach. Every year or so, a study appears from a box-office analytics company or on behalf of one of Hollywood’s theatrical trade groups concluding that audiences are more likely to stream a movie that’s been released in theaters.
    “It seems like for most of the other traditional media companies the pendulum has flown back to the idea that, yes, theatrical does enhance the value of a movie,” said Robert Fishman, analyst at MoffettNathanson.
    Hollywood insiders told CNBC that Netflix’s leaders have long admitted that money is being left on the table by not employing a typical theatrical model. But Netflix’s co-CEO, Ted Sarandos, has said he has no plans to change the company’s box-office strategy.

    “It would be complicated for Netflix, a distraction from what they’re trying to do,” said industry analyst David Poland. “And it would be potentially money-losing.”
    Sarandos has repeatedly said that Netflix’s purpose is to provide content for its streaming subscribers, noting that the audience that pays for its service should get it as soon as possible, not wait for an extended theatrical window to elapse.
    Netflix has benefited from its partnership with Sony, which gives the streamer exclusive U.S. streaming rights to the studio’s theatrical releases after they wrap up in theaters. With the deal, Netflix gets fresh content without the box-office risk.
    Of course, keeping subscribers happy is only part of the strategy. Netflix saves millions in marketing costs by skipping theaters, industry experts said. Typically, a film’s marketing budget is half of what it spent on production.
    So a film like the Russo Brothers’ “The Electric State,” which reportedly cost $320 million to make, could have had up to a $160 million marketing budget if it went to theaters. That’s a nearly $500 million investment before a theatrical opening, and a studio would then split ticket sales with cinemas.

    Millie Bobby Brown and Chris Pratt star in Netflix’s “The Electric State.”

    Notably, the film was originally slated to be produced under Universal Studios but was transferred to Netflix after executives at Universal balked at its steep budget, people familiar with the matter told CNBC.
    Success of a Netflix film is based on viewership, a metric that is not comparable to box-office dollars. “The Electric State” was streamed by 25.2 million subscribers in its first three days on the platform, according to Netflix’s Tudum site at the time of its release. That is about one-third of what Netflix’s “Red Notice” generated during its three-day launch in 2021. “Red Notice” is Netflix’s best-performing film to date with more than 230.9 million views.

    What Netflix offers

    It’s hard for directors and other creatives to dismiss the kind of viewership Netflix brings, Hollywood insiders told CNBC. It’s one of the reasons that Netflix has been able to draw in big-name directors, writers and producers over the last decade.
    Netflix has also been more flexible with its purse strings. “The Electric State” is just one example. Scorsese’s “The Irishman” also saw studios pass on the film because of its ballooning budget, but Netflix stepped in and acquired the rights. The film went on to garner 10 Oscar nominations, although it ultimately went home empty-handed during the 2020 ceremony.

    Al Pacino, Martin Scorsese and Robert De Niro attend “The Irishman” International Premiere and Closing Gala during the 63rd BFI London Film Festival
    Mike Marsland/WireImage

    “Netflix, because they have interest in getting awards and nominations and all that stuff, have funded and purchased and been involved with directors who are really high-quality filmmakers worldwide,” Poland said. “It’s a tribute to Netflix that those movies exist.”
    The streamer has had at least one best picture contender at the Academy Awards since 2019.
    The company has not been shy about spending money to secure top talent either. It’s signed dozens of lucrative first-look deals with creators, which give it the exclusive right to review and potentially purchase or distribute a new project before it is offered to other buyers. Past deals have run the gamut between television and film and included creators like Tyler Perry, Antoine Fuqua, Shonda Rhimes and Jennifer Lopez.
    Netflix has even been more targeted in its contracts, as was seen when it penned a two-picture deal with Johnson for sequels to his 2019 film “Knives Out,” which reportedly was for more than $400 million.
    “It would be tough for any creative to turn down the offer of the financial resources to realize their creative vision. And despite wanting their movies to be seen on the biggest screen possible, [they] have made the calculus that getting their works realized on film and presented on a major streaming platform is a bargain worth making,” Dergarabedian said.
    Wall Street doesn’t seem to mind Netflix’s movie strategy. The company’s stock is valued at nearly $1,300 a share and has soared 45% since January and more than 90% in the past year.
    Netflix is expected to spend around $18 billion on content this year, according to the company. It does not disclose what percentage of that funding goes to its movies versus its television productions. The company currently projects that its full-year 2025 revenue will be between $43.5 billion and $44.5 billion.
    Insiders said that with those kinds of investments, consumers might need to watch out for more price hikes. MoffettNathanson’s Fishman noted that Netflix will continue to weigh its value proposition to determine if it needs to increase the cost of its services.
    If Netflix keeps creating content from top-tier creators, then the analyst firm expects prices to increase.
    Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal and CNBC. More

  • in

    Struggling with the trade war? Amateur football might help

    Suzhou is one of China’s most important electronics manufacturing centres. But who cares about that? On June 29th nothing was more important to the city than its team beating nearby Yangzhou in a football match. The fierce rivalry stretches back more than 1,000 years to when the cities competed for pre-eminence along the Grand Canal. For centuries they also sought to outdo each other’s sublime gardens. Suzhou, the larger and richer of the two, was victorious during the Song dynasty. It continued its winning streak in 2025, comfortably beating Yangzhou 3-0. More