More stories

  • in

    This credit card behavior is an under-the-radar risk: ‘Be very careful,’ expert says

    “Credit cycling” is potentially risky behavior with credit cards, but isn’t widely known, experts said.
    It involves repeatedly maxing out cards and paying down the balance, effectively letting cardholders spend beyond their allotted credit limit.
    Card companies could close users’ accounts and cancel their rewards, among other risks, experts said.

    Olga Rolenko | Moment | Getty Images

    There are all sorts of ways for consumers to misuse credit cards, from failing to pay monthly bills in full to running up your balance. But here’s one risky behavior that experts say you likely haven’t heard of: “credit cycling.”
    Credit cards come with a spending limit. Cardholders are usually aware of this limit, which represents the overall cap to how much they can borrow. The limit resets with each billing statement when users pay their bill in full and on time.

    Users who credit-cycle will reach that limit and quickly pay down their balance; this frees up more headroom so consumers can effectively charge beyond their typical allowance.
    Doing this occasionally is usually not a big deal, experts said. It’s akin to driving a few miles per hour over the speed limit — something less likely to get a driver pulled over for speeding, said Ted Rossman, senior industry analyst at CreditCards.com.
    But consistently “churning” through available credit comes with risks, Rossman said.

    For example, card issuers may cancel a user’s card and take away their reward points, experts said. This might negatively impact a user’s credit score, they said.
    “If there’s even the slightest chance credit cycling can go sideways, it’s best not to do it and look for alternatives,” said Bruce McClary, senior vice president at the National Foundation for Credit Counseling. “You have to be very careful.”

    Card companies see credit cycling as a risk

    The average American’s credit card limit was about $34,000 at the end of the second quarter of 2024, according to Experian, one the three major credit bureaus. (This was the limit across all their cards.)
    The amount varies across generations, and according to factors like income and credit usage, according to Experian.
    It’s understandable why some consumers would want to credit cycle, experts said.
    More from Personal Finance:Why summer Fridays are increasingly rareHow GOP megabill affects families with kidsWhat a Trump, Powell showdown means for your money
    Certain consumers may have a relatively low credit limit, and credit cycling might help them pay for a big-ticket purchase like a home repair, wedding or a costly vacation, experts said. Others may do it to accelerate the rewards and points they get for making purchases, they said.
    But card issuers would likely see repeat offenders as a red flag, Rossman said.

    Maxing out a card frequently may run afoul of certain terms and conditions, or signal that a user is experiencing financial difficulty and struggling to stay within their budget, he said.
    Issuers may also view it as a potential sign of illegal activity like money laundering, he said.
    “You could be putting yourself at risk by appearing to be a risk in that way,” McClary said.

    Credit cycling consequences

    If a card issuer penalizes a credit-cycling customer by closing their account, it could have negative repercussions for their credit score, experts said.
    Credit utilization is the share of one’s outstanding debt relative to their credit limit. Keeping utilization relatively low generally helps boost one’s credit score, while a high rate generally hurts it, McClary said.
    Experts generally recommend keeping credit utilization below 30%, and below 10% if you really want to improve your credit score.
    A canceled card would reduce one’s overall credit limit, raising the odds that a user’s credit utilization rate would increase if they have outstanding debt on other credit cards, McClary said.

    Further, a card company could flag misuse as a reason for the account closure, potentially making the user look like more of a risk to future creditors, he added.
    Consistently butting up against one’s credit limit also increases the chances of accidentally breaching that threshold, McClary said. Doing so could lead creditors to charge over-limit fees or raise a user’s interest rate, he said.
    Consumers who credit-cycle should be cognizant of any recurring monthly subscriptions or other charges that might inadvertently push them over the limit, he said.

    What to do instead

    Instead of credit cycling, consumers may be better served by asking their card issuer for a higher credit limit, opening a new credit card account or spreading payments over more than one card, Rossman said.
    As a general practice, Rossman is a “big fan” of paying down one’s credit card bill early, such as in the middle of the billing cycle instead of waiting for the end. (To be clear, this isn’t the same as credit cycling, since consumers wouldn’t be paying down their balance early in order to spend beyond their allotted credit.)
    This can reduce a consumer’s credit utilization rate — and boost one’s credit score — since card balances are generally only reported to the credit bureaus at the end of the monthly billing cycle, he said.
    “It can be a good way to improve your score, especially if you use your card a lot,” he said. More

  • in

    Airlines divert, suspend flights after Israel’s strike on Iran closes airspace in Middle East

    United, Delta, Turkish Airlines and a host of other carriers canceled Israel flights or extended a suspension of service.
    Israel launched missile strikes on Iran overnight, and Iran launched more than 100 drones toward Israel on Friday morning.
    Military conflicts have forced airlines to reroute planes or suspend service repeatedly in recent years, forcing them to take longer flight paths as a safety measure.

    Flight map over the Middle East as Iran launches retaliatory attacks on Israel at 19:19 UTC on June 13th, 2025.
    Source: FlightRadar24

    Airlines around the world canceled flights to Israel and were skirting a large swath of airspace in the Middle East on Friday after Israel’s overnight missile strikes on Iran. Iran later launched drones toward Israeli territory.
    Delta Air Lines on Friday afternoon said it was suspending its service to Tel Aviv, Israel, until at least September, just weeks after resuming flights there. It had most recently resumed flights on May 20, and as of last week Delta had said it was planning to increase service to Israel later this year from New York to two daily nonstop flights, “responding to strong winter demand.”

    United Airlines suspended its Tel Aviv flights through July 31, and said in statement that “we will continue to evaluate an appropriate return date with the safety of our customers and crews as our top priority.”
    Both carriers’ Tel Aviv-bound flights turned around over the Atlantic Ocean to return to the New York area after Israel’s strikes overnight. United put 26 of its crew members who were on layover in Israel on Israeli airline El Al to get back to the U.S., a spokesman said.
    El Al has since suspended service.
    “Following recent security developments and in accordance with the instructions from the state’s security and aviation authorities to close Israeli airspace, all EL AL and Sundor flights are suspended for the time being,” it said on its website.
    The carrier said it won’t take bookings until at least the end of June and warned customers against going to Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion Airport.

    “For customers currently abroad, we recommend arranging accommodation until there is a change in security directives,” El Al said. “Flights that were en route to Israel have been diverted to land at various EL AL destinations.”

    Israel closes its airspace and suspended flight operations at Ben Gurion International Airport in Tel Aviv, Israel on June 13, 2025.
    Nir Keidar | Anadolu | Getty Images

    Turkish Airlines and European budget carrier Wizz Air also suspended Israel flights. Germany’s Lufthansa said it was suspending Tel Aviv and Tehran service until July 31 and flights to Jordan and Lebanon until at least June 20. Emirates said it was canceling service from its base in Dubai to Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon and Iran.
    Airlines offered travel vouchers and waived change fees to customers affected by the disruptions.
    Escalating military conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine have forced airlines to repeatedly take longer and more costly routes to avoid conflict zones.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Shares of scandal-plagued Brazilian meat giant JBS rise 3% in U.S. public debut

    Brazilian meat giant JBS opened at $13.65 per share in its U.S. public market debut on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker “JBS.”
    Last year, the company reported net revenue of $77.2 billion and net income of $2 billion, according to regulatory filings.
    The company has been plagued by bribery and corruption scandals.

    The JBS Greeley meatpacking facility in Greeley, Colorado, US, on Friday, Feb. 28, 2025.
    Chet Strange | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Shares of Brazilian meat giant JBS rose during their U.S. public market debut on Friday.
    The opening trade of $13.65 per share values the company at roughly $30 billion, outstripping rival Tyson Foods’ market cap of about $19.82 billion. Shares closed at $13.87, a slight gain for the day.

    JBS is now trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker “JBS,” a day later than initially expected. The company said it couldn’t conclude certain operational procedures in time to debut on Thursday. Its stock was delisted from the Sao Paolo Exchange in Brazil a week ago as part of the dual-listing plan.
    Since its founding more than seven decades ago, JBS has grown to become the world’s largest meatpacking company. Last year, the company reported net revenue of $77.2 billion and net income of $2 billion, according to regulatory filings.
    JBS operates a sprawling business worldwide, with significant divisions in Brazil, the U.S. and Australia. The company also owns more than 80% of Pilgrim’s Pride, the U.S. poultry giant.
    JBS’s U.S. listing is more than 15 years in the making. The company’s U.S. subsidiary first announced plans to go public in 2009, but the move never came to fruition after two postponements. Then, in late 2016, the company said it would have a U.S. initial public offering as part of a broader reorganization strategy. But months later, the Brazilian government began investigating corruption in the meatpacking company — including among JBS and its top executives.
    J&F Investimentos, the holding company that owns a controlling stake in JBS, paid a $3.2 billion fine in 2017 to settle bribery charges. Former chair Joesley Batista and his older brother CEO Wesley Batista, the company’s top shareholders and the sons of its founder, managed to avoid prison sentences by cooperating with prosecutors. The Batistas and J&F settled with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in 2020 for roughly $27 million.

    The Batistas exited J&F in the wake of the scandal. However, they returned to the company’s board last year after being acquitted of insider trading charges.
    More recently, in October, the Brazilian government fined JBS for buying cattle that were allegedly illegally raised in protected land in the Amazon.
    The company’s history of corruption and bribery allegations led to opposition to its U.S. listing from lawmakers on the both sides of the aisle, making it look unlikely that regulators would grant their approval.
    After President Donald Trump’s reelection, JBS’s subsidiary Pilgrim’s Pride donated $5 million to his inaugration committee, making it the single largest donor. In a statement to CNBC at the time, the company said it had a “long bipartisan history participating in the civic process” and looked forward to working with the new administration.
    The SEC approved JBS’s request to list on the New York Stock Exchange in April. JBS shareholders approved the move by a narrow margin the following month. More

  • in

    What an Israel-Iran war means for oil prices

    For the past two years, the Middle East has been a tense place. Houthis have bombed commercial ships; Israel has begun full-blown military campaigns in Gaza and Lebanon; it and Iran have exchanged rockets. Yet oil markets remained calm, since the worst-case scenario—a full-blown war between Israel and Iran—had been avoided. More

  • in

    What the Israel-Iran war means for oil prices

    FOR THE past two years, the Middle East has been an even more tense place than usual. Houthis bombed commercial vessels; Israel began extensive military campaigns in Gaza and Lebanon; Iran and Israel exchanged rockets. Yet oil markets remained calm, since the worst-case scenario—a full-blown war between Israel and Iran—was avoided. More

  • in

    WNBA renews media rights deal with Scripps

    The WNBA and E.W. Scripps announced on Friday a new multiyear media rights agreement to carry Friday night WNBA matchups on Ion.
    The new agreement comes after Ion has seen huge growth with the WNBA and as the league gains in popularity thanks to stars such as Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese.
    WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert said the partnership with Scripps has helped the league expand its reach and visibility.

    Caitlin Clark, #22 of the Indiana Fever, brings the ball up court during the first half of a WNBA game against the Chicago Sky at Wintrust Arena in Chicago on Aug. 30, 2024.
    Melissa Tamez | Icon Sportswire | Getty Images

    The WNBA and E.W. Scripps announced on Friday a new multiyear media rights agreement to carry Friday night WNBA matchups on Ion.
    The new agreement also includes the “WNBA on Ion” studio show, the first weekly broadcast show dedicated exclusively to WNBA coverage.

    The value of the deal was not disclosed, but media reports peg the original deal that expires at the end of the 2025 season at an average of $13 million annually.
    The WNBA has been airing games on Ion since 2023. This season, the network will broadcast 50 regular season games. Ion is available on pay TV and streaming platforms in more than 128 million homes, according to a news release.
    The new agreement comes after Ion has seen huge growth with the WNBA and as the league gains in popularity thanks to stars such as Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese.
    The network said WNBA Friday Night Spotlight viewership grew 133% year over year and more than 23 million unique viewers tuned into the coverage.
    “Our robust partnership with the league has flourished, and we are thrilled to solidify ION’s status as the premier Friday night destination for WNBA action for years to come,” said Scripps CEO Adam Symson in the release.

    WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert said the partnership with Scripps has helped the league expand its reach and visibility.
    “This new multi-year agreement reflects the growing excitement surrounding the league and the rising demand for WNBA games,” she said.
    The league signed an 11-year media rights deal with Disney, Amazon and Comcast-owned NBCUniversal last July as part of the NBA’s media rights negotiation. The WNBA’s deal is valued at about $200 million per year, CNBC previously reported.
    — CNBC’s Lillian Rizzo contributed to this report.
    Disclosure: Comcast owns NBCUniversal, the parent company of CNBC. More

  • in

    Battle over Jimmy Buffett’s $275 million estate highlights risks of family trusts

    A court battle is brewing over Jimmy Buffett’s $275 million estate.
    The late singer’s widow, Jane, and the co-trustee of the estate, Richard Mozenter, have filed lawsuits against one another.
    Attorneys said the Buffett case offers important lessons for families planning wealth transfers.

    A court battle over the late singer Jimmy Buffett’s $275 million estate has highlighted the growing litigation over the trillions of dollars in wealth being passed down to spouses and families, experts said.
    Jimmy Buffett’s widow, Jane Buffett, filed a petition last week in a Los Angeles court to remove her co-trustee, Richard Mozenter, from the marital trust created to support her after the singer’s death in 2023. Jane Buffett, who married Jimmy in 1977, alleged that Mozenter has been “openly hostile and adversarial” toward her and has refused to give her details on the trust and its financials. She alleged Mozenter is collecting “excessive fees” of $1.7 million a year and that he’s mismanaging the trust assets, projecting income of only $2 million, implying annual returns of less than 1%.

    Mozenter has filed his own lawsuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, alleging that Jane has been “completely uncooperative” in his efforts to manage the trust. He said Jane has interfered in business decisions, refused to meet with Mozenter and breached her fiduciary duties by “acting in her own interest.”
    The case has put a spotlight on the estate plans and business empire left by Jimmy Buffett, the singer famous for hits like “Margaritaville,” “Cheeseburger in Paradise” and other breezy, beach-vibe hits. Along with his song catalogue, Buffett left homes, cars, planes and a multimillion-dollar stake in his brand business.

    Musician Jimmy Buffett performs onstage at Jimmy Buffett & Friends: Live from the Gulf Coast, a concert presented by CMT at on the beach on July 11, 2010 in Gulf Shores, Alabama.
    Rick Diamond | Getty Images Entertainment | Getty Images

    Buffett planned carefully for the afterlife. His will, first written more than 30 years ago and amended in 2017 and again in 2023, directed that most of his assets be placed in a marital trust for Jane. The trust was created “for the wife’s sole benefit of her lifetime,” according to legal filings. The three children they shared — Savannah, Delaney and Cameron — are the so-called remainder beneficiaries of the marital trust, which means they will receive any remaining assets left after Jane’s death.
    Jimmy Buffett also called for a co-trustee to manage the trust with Jane. He appointed Mozenter, an accountant who had also been his business manager and financial advisors for 30 years, as co-trustee.
    The assets Buffett left were substantial. A successful businessman and entrepreneur, Buffett built a brand empire and merchandising business that far surpassed his song rights and touring. According to the filings, the assets in the estate included $34.5 million of real property; $15 million of equity in a company called Strange Bird Inc., which held Buffett’s interest in various planes; $2 million in musical equipment; $5 million in vehicles; and $12 million in other investments.

    One of the largest assets is Buffett’s stake in Margaritaville, the chain of restaurants, bars, hotels and merchandising that commercialized the Buffett lifestyle. According to the filings, Buffett’s equity in Margaritaville was estimated at $85 million, held though JB Beta. Margaritaville currently has 30 restaurants and bars, 20 hotels, and vacation clubs, casinos, cruise ships and merchandise.
    Soon after Jimmy’s death, however, the relationship between two co-trustees soured. In her complaint, Jane Buffett said Mozenter refused to provide her with basic financial information about the trust. He “belittled, disrespected, and condescended Mrs. Buffett” in response to her request for information, she said. She said his fees of $1.7 million a year to manage the trust were “enormous.” When she asked for her projected income from the trust, Mozenter continued to delay. Finally, after she enlisted the help of her friend Jeff Bewkes, the former Time Warner chief, Mozenter provide her with an estimate of $2 million a year.

    (L-R) Jimmy Buffett and Jane Slagsvol attend the 2022 Vanity Fair Oscar Party hosted by Radhika Jones at Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts on March 27, 2022 in Beverly Hills, California.
    Arturo Holmes | Filmmagic | Getty Images

    According to Jane’s complaint, Mozenter acknowledged that Margaritaville had paid distributions of $14 million over the previous 18 months. Yet he declined to make future projections. “Based on that analysis, Mr. Mozenter told Mrs. Buffett that the Marital Trust’s income would not cover her annual expenses and advised that she could ‘consider adjustments,'” according to her complaint.
    Trust lawyers said the case is part of a growing wave of lawsuits related to inheritances and trusts. Over $100 trillion of wealth is expected to be passed down from older generations to spouses and families over the next 25 years, according to Cerulli Associates. More wealth being passed down means more litigation, since families often fight over who gets what.
    The Buffett case has reflected a different, but equally common, source of disputes: dueling trustees. Estate attorneys said Buffett could have made Jane the sole beneficiary as well as the sole trustee. Yet he chose to have Mozenter as co-trustee to help manage and direct the trust.
    Mozenter said that during his lifetime, Jimmy “repeatedly expressed his concerns regarding Jane’s ability to manage and control his assets” and was “very careful to create the trust in a manner that precluded Jane from having actual control over the trust.” He added, “This fact has made Jane very angry.”
    Attorneys said appointing a co-trustee is common. Sometimes the inheritor is ill-equipped to handle the wealth or asset. Sometimes they’d rather leave the details to someone else. Whatever the reason, tensions between the beneficiary and co-trustee often erupt into full-blown hostility.
    “These cases almost all turn on the exact same issue,” said Keith A. Davidson, with Albertson & Davidson LLP. “You’ve got a beneficiary who doesn’t feel like they’re getting enough information and doesn’t feel like they have any say. And you have a trustee who is being too paternalistic, and they feel like they can give out information what they want. That’s a recipe for disaster.”

    Get Inside Wealth directly to your inbox

    Emotions run especially high when one of the trustees is a spouse.
    “Imagine you’re married to Jimmy Buffett for 47 years, you have a say in how you’re spending your money and what you’re doing and all that goes away overnight,” said Stewart Albertson, also with Albertson & Davidson LLP.
    Since the lawsuits were filed in different states, courts will first have to decide where the case will be heard. After that, a judge will start arguments and ultimately decide a path forward. Attorneys said judges have typically sided with the outside trustee (in this case Mozenter). Yet increasingly, they have been siding with spouses — which could mean Mozenter is removed.
    More likely, attorneys said, a judge will determine that the relationship between Mozenter and Jane is unworkable and name a new, professional or corporate trustee from a trust company or bank to replace them both.
    “My guess is a judge is likely to put in someone as a professional fiduciary,” said Alex Weingarten, managing partner of Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP’s Los Angeles office and chair of its entertainment litigation practice. “That would allow the fiduciary to get in and figure out what’s going on. It’s not what she wants, but it would give credence to her argument.”
    Attorneys said Mozenter’s $1.7 million fee isn’t necessarily excessive, since trustee fees can sometimes be as high as 1% or more of the assets each year. As for the return of $2 million a year on $275 million being proof of mismanagement, attorneys say many of the assets in the trust, like real estate, planes and cars, don’t produce income and cost money to maintain. So the actual returns on income-producing assets could be higher.

    Singer-songwriter Jimmy Buffett performs with The Coral Reefer Band at The Omni Coliseum on September 4, 1976 in Atlanta, Georgia. 
    Tom Hill | Wireimage | Getty Images

    Still, attorneys said the Buffett case offers two important lessons for families planning wealth transfers. First, they said wealth holders should communicate the plans for their estates before they die so no one is surprised. If Buffett had explained the co-trustee roles to both Jane and Mozenter, perhaps tensions would have been minimized.
    “Jimmy did good planning, in that he set these trusts up,” Davidson said. “But he didn’t think about how this was actually going to play out.” He also could have added a “removal right” in the trust to allow Jane to more easily remove Mozenter if she wished.
    The second lesson is that friends or business associates don’t always make good trustees. While today’s wealthy often name a trusted friend to a family trust, the trustee may have a different relationship with the beneficiary and can see themselves as carrying out the wishes of the descendant — which is not the job of a trustee.
    “In terms of problem cases, the ones we see, they rarely involve professional trustees,” Albertson said. “It’s almost always somebody who’s a friend. That tends to be the worst. Your role is to follow the trust terms.” More

  • in

    Air India crash: What to know about the first fatal Boeing Dreamliner tragedy

    Air India Flight 171 crashed Thursday moments after takeoff from Ahmedabad, India, bound for London.
    There were 242 people on board when the Boeing Dreamliner crashed into a residential area, killing all but one person on the flight.
    It’s the first fatal crash of Boeing’s Dreamliner aircraft.

    A view shows the wreckage of an Air India aircraft, bound for London’s Gatwick Airport, which crashed during take-off from an airport in Ahmedabad, India June 12, 2025.
    Adnan Abidi | Reuters

    An Air India plane that was bound for London and carrying 242 people crashed seconds after takeoff in western India on Thursday, killing all but one person on board the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.
    It marked the first crash of a Boeing 787 Dreamliner and was the deadliest plane crash in years.

    Here’s what to know:

    What kind of plane was it?

    The aircraft was a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner. It is a popular twin-aisle jet used for longer routes.
    This plane’s first flight was in December 2013 and it was handed over to Air India in January 2014, according to aviation-data firm Cirium.
    Air India had 34 of them in service as of Thursday, including this plane, and it had plans to order at least 20 more, Cirium said. The airline has been building up its fleet with modern jets from both Boeing and rival Airbus, and installing more luxurious cabins.
    There are more than 1,100 Dreamliners flying worldwide.

    What happened on this flight?

    Preliminary data show the signal from the plane was lost at 1:38 p.m. local time, less than a minute after takeoff from Ahmedabad’s Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport, according to flight-tracker Flightradar24.
    The aircraft reached maximum altitude of 625 feet, though airport altitude is about 200 feet, Flightradar noted.
    It is not clear why the plane so quickly lost altitude before it crashed into a fireball in a residential area. Other fatalities on the ground have been reported to local media.
    Air crashes can be caused by a variety of factors, from mechanical issues to wildlife to pilot error, and often involve more than one problem.

    What will investigators look at?

    Responders will comb the rubble for the so-called black boxes: the cockpit and flight-data recorders. Those will give crash investigators clues about what was happening on the flight.
    Crash investigators will look at everything from the airline’s maintenance records to the pilots’ maneuvers, the position of the aircraft as well as slats and flaps on the wings, the pilots’ training and recent rest, and weather conditions on the hot day, when temperatures were near 100 degrees Farenheit.
    They will also examine video from the incident, including footage of the aircraft taking off from Ahmedabad.
    Under international protocols, the country where the incident occurred will lead the investigation while the plane’s manufacturer, Boeing, and the aircraft’s engine maker, GE Aerospace, as well as U.S. federal crash investigators will participate.

    There have been manufacturing and quality concerns about Dreamliners before. Are they related?

    It is not immediately clear, and a final report on the crash causes might not be available until next year, but some experts brushed off a manufacturing issue, in part because the plane has been flying for more than a decade.
    “I don’t think this is a manufacturing or production issue,” said Jeff Guzzetti, a retired air safety investigator with the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board and the Federal Aviation Administration. 
    He said it is too early to tell what the problem — or problems — is, as air crashes often involve several failures.
    “It appears the airplane got off the runway with no problem but for some reason was unable to climb,” he said.
    Boeing has had problems with the Dreamliner before, but an immediate connection wasn’t apparent, experts said.
    A whistleblower last year alleged that Boeing took shortcuts on the 787 to reduce bottlenecks and created “excessive stress” on major airplane joints. Boeing denied the accusations.
    Deliveries of the aircraft were also grounded for about a year until mid-2022 because of manufacturing flaws where parts of the fuselage were improperly spaced.
    After the Dreamliner first entered service in 2011, the planes were grounded for inspections due to fears of lithium battery fires.

    What does this mean for Boeing?

    Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg, who took the reins last August, has been working to move the manufacturer, a top U.S. exporter, out of the spotlight for a series of safety and manufacturing crises.
    The company had already been reeling from two crashes of its best-selling 737 Max jets when a door plug blew out of a new Max 9 in early 2024.
    The impact on Boeing will depend on the crash investigation. Demand for new planes has still been robust, and airlines often continue to place orders because the waiting period can stretch several years.
    Wolfe Research said in a note on Thursday that “we don’t see much direct impact on financial performance, but this is certain to sap momentum until some solid clarity is provided.
    “We don’t see any impact to the production ramp as a result of this and would expect any impact on demand to be very minimal (and localized) as well,” Wolfe wrote. “A modest risk could be any feedback loop to certification of the [yet-to-be-certified] 777X, but it is very early to size any risk there.”
    Boeing has orders for 900 more Dreamliners, according to its website. More