More stories

  • in

    Citi fined $79 million by British regulators over fat-finger trading and control errors

    British regulators on Wednesday dished out a combined £61.6 million ($79 million) in fines to U.S. investment bank Citi for failings in its trading systems and controls.
    The fines and were issued by the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority, whose investigation focused on the period between April 1, 2018, and May 31, 2022.

    People walk by a CitiBank location in Manhattan on March 01, 2024 in New York City. 
    Spencer Platt | Getty Images

    LONDON — British regulators on Wednesday dished out a combined £61.6 million ($79 million) in fines to U.S. investment bank Citi for failings in its trading systems and controls.
    The fines were issued by the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority, whose investigation focused on the period between April 1, 2018, and May 31, 2022. Citi qualified for a 30% reduction in the amount of the penalty after agreeing to resolve the matter.

    “Firms involved in trading must have effective controls in place in order to manage the risks involved. CGML [Citigroup Global Markets Limited] failed to meet the standards we expect in this area, resulting in today’s fine,” Sam Woods, deputy governor for prudential regulation and the chief executive officer of the PRA, said in a statement Wednesday.
    The regulators said that certain system and control issues persisted during the probe period and led to trading incidents, such as so-called fat-finger trading blunders. The main incident highlighted took place on May 2. 2022, when an experienced trader incorrectly inputted an order, which resulted in $1.4 billion “inadvertently being executed on European exchanges.”
    “Deficiencies in CGML’s trading controls contributed to this incident, in particular the absence of certain preventative hard blocks and the inappropriate calibration of other controls,” the statement read.
    In a statement to CNBC, a Citi spokesperson said that the bank was pleased to resolve the matter from more than two years ago, “which arose from an individual error that was identified and corrected within minutes.”
    “We immediately took steps to strengthen our systems and controls, and remain committed to ensuring full regulatory compliance.” the spokesperson said. More

  • in

    Chinese EV company Xpeng shares surge 13% after forecasting growth in car deliveries

    Chinese electric car company Xpeng saw its shares soar after reporting an improvement in profit margin and an upbeat outlook for second-quarter deliveries.
    Xpeng reported that vehicle margin rose 5.5% in the first three months of the year, from a negative 2.5% in the prior quarter. Vehicle margin is a measure of profitability.
    The company forecast deliveries of 29,000 to 32,000 cars in the second quarter, a year-on-year increase of at least 25%.

    The Xpeng X9 electric MPV on display at the Beijing auto show on April 25, 2024.
    CNBC | Evelyn Cheng

    BEIJING — Chinese electric car company Xpeng saw its shares soar after reporting an improvement in profit margin and an upbeat outlook for second-quarter deliveries.
    The company’s Hong Kong-listed shares rose more than 13% in morning trade Wednesday. U.S.-listed shares had climbed by nearly 6% in U.S. trade Tuesday after reporting first quarter results.

    Xpeng reported that vehicle margin rose 5.5% in the first three months of the year, from a negative 2.5% in the prior quarter. Vehicle margin is a measure of profitability — the higher the margin, the greater the profit the company is making on its car sales.
    The company forecast deliveries of 29,000 to 32,000 cars in the second quarter, a year-on-year increase of at least 25%.
    Xpeng delivered 21,821 cars in the first quarter of the year, and 9, 393 cars in April.

    Following the earnings release, Nomura analysts said in a note Wednesday they are reviewing their estimates for Xpeng.
    “Overall, we see XPENG forging ahead with its business plans, and believe that it may enjoy some development ahead,” the report said.

    “Meanwhile, considering the intensifying competition in the overall market, that renders smaller players more vulnerable, we remain slightly cautious and suggest investors to closely monitor the new model to be launched under the MONA brand next month,” the Nomura analysts said.

    Read more on Pro

    Similar to other companies looking to stay competitive in China’s electric car market, Xpeng is expanding its product lineup with a lower-cost vehicle brand called Mona.
    The first Mona car — an electric sedan below 200,000 yuan ($27,890) — is set for release in June and scheduled to begin mass deliveries in the third quarter, according to the company.
    Xpeng attributed several hundred million yuan in services revenue to its partnership with German automaker Volkswagen. The services segment overall surged by 93.1% year-on-year to 1 billion yuan in the first quarter.
    The Chinese company said that in the first half of this year it is establishing partnerships with auto dealership groups in Western Europe, Southeast Asia, the Middle East and Australia to open new stores. In all, Xpeng said it plans to expand its sales network to more than 20 countries. That’s according to a first quarter earnings call transcript from FactSet. More

  • in

    McDonald’s franchisee group says $5 value meal can’t last without company investment

    An independent advocacy group of McDonald’s franchisees is weighing in on the company’s upcoming value meal promotion.
    It cheers affordability for the consumer, but pushes for future contributions from the company to make the discounted offering sustainable for operators in the long run. 
    The $5 value meal will hit menu boards beginning June 25 and will last roughly a month.

    An employee hands an order to a customer through a drive-thru window at a McDonald’s restaurant in Oakland, California, on April 9, 2020.
    David Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    An independent advocacy group of McDonald’s franchisees is weighing in on the company’s upcoming value meal promotion, cheering affordability for the consumer, but pushing for future contributions from the company to make the discounted offering sustainable for operators in the long run. 
    “The fact remains that in order to provide the consumer with more affordable options, they must be affordable for the owner/operators. McDonald’s vast resources and financial investment are essential to any sustainable affordable strategy,” the board of the National Owners Association wrote in a letter to membership.

    The letter calls the McDonald’s business model a “penny profit business, with 10-15% margins,” and says “There simply is not enough profit to discount 30% for this model to be sustainable. It necessitates a financial contribution by McDonald’s.”
    CNBC reported last week that the $5 value meal would be hitting menu boards beginning June 25 and lasting roughly a month. It will include a McChicken or McDouble, four piece chicken nuggets, fries and a drink. The combo would be substantially less than purchasing those items individually.
    The offering comes as lower-income consumers pull back from certain restaurants in the face of stubborn inflation, and brands look to offer greater value to customers.
    CNBC reported Coca-Cola had added marketing funds to make the deal more appealing for McDonald’s and its franchisees after an initial proposal did not pass internal hurdles. In a statement last week, Coca-Cola said, “We routinely partner with our customers on marketing programs to meet consumer needs. This helps us grow our businesses together.”
    McDonald’s declined to comment on the NOA letter to its membership. In a statement to CNBC last week on the value meal, the company said, “We know how much it means to our customers when McDonald’s offers meaningful value and communicates it through national advertising. That’s been true since our very beginning and never more important than it is today.”

    The company has previously noted cash flows for U.S. franchisees are up nearly 50% on average since 2018. Even when accounting for inflation, 2023 was one of the best years for franchisee cash flow in the company’s history, McDonald’s has previously said.
    Beyond the $5 promotion, the NOA letter goes on to suggest the company should continue to innovate on the menu, bringing back items such as snack wraps that use existing chicken breasts, creating affordable options with lower food costs so they are more affordable for owners to sell.
    The group also suggested taking the top two beverages from McDonald’s spinoff chain, CosMc’s, and bringing them to flagship locations as a way to excite both customers and employees.
    These ideas were initially floated by the advocacy group earlier in the year, as it pushed to add affordable options to the menu without discounting “core and iconic” items.
    “Recently [McDonald’s CEO Chris Kempczinski] has made public comments about the US consumers’ growing need for affordability. This is not a new or unique message; value has always been at our Brands’s core,” NOA said in a letter to membership viewed by CNBC in February.

    Don’t miss these exclusives from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Can the rich world escape its baby crisis?

    Three decades ago, when women now entering their 40s became fertile, East Asian governments had reason to celebrate. If a South Korean woman behaved in the same way as her older compatriots, she would emerge from her childbearing years with 1.7 offspring on average, down from 4.5 in 1970. Across the region, policymakers had brought down teenage pregnancies dramatically. The drop in birth rates, which occured over the span of a single generation, was a stunning success. That was until it carried on. And on.A South Korean woman who is now becoming fertile will have on average just 0.7 children over her childbearing years if she follows the example of her older peers. Since 2006 the country’s government has spent $270bn, or just over 1% of GDP a year, on babymaking incentives such as tax breaks for parents, maternity care and even state-sponsored dating. Officials would love even just a few of the “missing” births back. More

  • in

    Here’s how to buy renewable energy from your electric utility

    Many renters and homeowners can opt to get their electricity from renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind.
    Such customers can choose a green energy program offered through their electric utility.
    Consumers should select a green power option or renewable energy certificate that has been verified by an independent third party.

    Wind turbines in Dawson, Texas, on Feb. 28, 2023. 
    Mark Felix | Afp | Getty Images

    As carbon emissions from fossil fuels keep warming the planet, eco-conscious consumers may wonder if there’s a way to buy electricity from renewable sources without installing technology like solar panels or windmills on their property.
    In short, the answer is yes.

    However, the option isn’t necessarily available to all homeowners and renters. It also often comes with a slight price premium, experts said.

    Few people are aware they can buy green energy

    Renewable energy sources — including wind, solar, hydropower, geothermal and biomass — accounted for about 21% of U.S. electricity generation in 2023, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
    Most, or 60%, of energy sources came from fossil fuels like coal, natural gas and oil. These energy sources release carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas that traps heat in the atmosphere and contributes to global warming.
    The White House aims for electricity generation to be free of greenhouse gas emissions by 2035.

    A growing number of individuals and organizations are opting to shift away from fossil fuels: About 9.6 million customers bought 273 Terawatt hours of renewable energy through voluntary green power markets in 2022, according to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. That’s up fivefold from 54 TWh in 2012.

    In the voluntary market, customers buy renewable energy in amounts that exceed states’ minimum requirements from utility companies. Over half of all U.S. states have policies to raise the share of electricity sourced from renewables, though most targets are years away.
    Voluntary purchases accounted for 28% of the renewable energy market, excluding hydropower, as of 2016, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. They help increase overall demand for renewable electricity, thereby driving change in the energy mix, the EPA said.

    Photovoltaic solar panels at the Roadrunner solar plant near McCamey, Texas, on Nov. 10, 2023. 
    Jordan Vonderhaar/Bloomberg via Getty Images

    The bulk of the increase is from corporations, according to NREL estimates. Residential sales have grown, too, but more slowly.
    Just one in six U.S. adults know that they may have the option to buy renewable power, either from their electric company or another provider, according to the most recent NREL survey data on the topic, published in 2011.
    “The market does continue to grow every year in terms of sales and customers,” said Jenny Sumner, group manager of modeling and analysis at the NREL.
    “But very few people are aware” that they can opt into green programs, she said. “It’s just not something that’s top of mind for most people.”

    How consumers can buy green power

    Joe Raedle | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    Wind turbines in Solano County, California, on Aug. 28, 2023.
    Loren Elliott/Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Power companies may offer what’s known as green pricing programs.
    Customers in these programs, also known as utility green power programs, pay their utility a “small premium” to get electricity from renewable sources, according to the U.S. Energy Department.
    The cost generally exceeds that of a utility’s standard electricity service by about 1 to 2 cents per kilowatt hour, Sumner said.
    That may roughly translate to about $5 to $15 more per month, Sumner said. It will ultimately depend on factors like program price and household energy use, she added.
    Nearly half of Americans, 47%, said they were willing to pay more to get their electricity from 100% renewable sources, according to a 2019 poll by Yale University’s Program on Climate Change Communication. On average, they said they would be willing to pay $33.72 more per month.
    Green power marketing programs
    Consumers in some states can also opt into green power marketing programs.
    Such states have “competitive” energy markets, meaning consumers can choose from among many different companies to generate their power. But unlike green pricing programs, the company generating the renewable power may not be the customer’s utility, which distributes the power.

    According to the U.S. Energy Department and the EPA, residential green power options are available in these states with competitive or deregulated markets: California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas and Virginia.
    These also tend to come with a premium, though in some regions they “may be price competitive with default electricity options,” the agencies wrote.
    Community choice aggregation
    With “community choice aggregation” programs, local governments buy power from an alternative green power supplier on behalf of their residents.
    The municipality essentially operates as the supplier for the community’s electricity, Sumner said. These programs are especially prevalent in California, she said.
    Unlike the other program types, residents generally don’t have to opt into community choice programs; it’s typically automatic and consumers can opt out if they wish, Sumner said.

    How renewable energy certificates work

    A solar farm in Imperial, California, on December 6, 2023. 
    Valerie Macon | Afp | Getty Images

    Just because a consumer opts for renewable power doesn’t mean the electricity being pumped into their home is coming from those renewable sources.
    This may sound strange, but it has to do with the physical nature of electricity and its movement through the shared electric grid.
    “Once the electrons have been injected into the grid, there’s no way of tagging that these are ‘green’ electrons and these are not green,” said Joydeep Mitra, head of the power system program at Michigan State University. “Nobody knows which electrons are going where.”

    Green energy programs instead rely on “renewable energy certificates,” or RECs.
    The certificates are essentially an accounting mechanism for the generation and purchase of renewable energy, Mitra said.
    You may not be getting the green power, but someone somewhere is. And RECs keep track of it all.
    Any consumer, even one who doesn’t have access to a green power program through their utility, can also purchase a REC as a separate, stand-alone product. It’s a way to provide extra funding to a renewable energy project, typically sold by a broker or marketer rather than a utility, Sumner said.
    Buying these certificates separately doesn’t impact a consumer’s existing utility service relationship.

    How to verify your electricity is green

    Experts recommend choosing a green power option or REC that has been verified by an independent third party.
    That’s because the voluntary sales and purchases of renewable energy aren’t subject to government oversight, according to the EPA and U.S. Energy Department.
    One such independent body is the Center for Resource Solutions, a nonprofit that oversees the Green-e certification standard, the agencies said.
    For example, Green-e polices the disclosures energy suppliers make to consumers about renewable energy and verifies that the purchase of that energy isn’t being counted toward state energy mandates, among other things.
    In this new series, CNBC will examine what climate change means for your money, from retirement savings to insurance costs to career outlook.
    Has climate change left you with bigger or new bills? Tell us about your experience by emailing me at gregory.iacurci@nbcuni.com. More

  • in

    Here’s where rents are rising — and where they’re falling

    Multifamily rents in April were 0.8% lower than they were in the same month last year, according to Apartment List.
    Single-family rents are much stronger, up 3.4% in March year over year, according to a new report from CoreLogic.
    Of the nation’s 20 largest cities, Seattle saw the highest year-over-year increase in single-family rents, followed by New York and Boston.

    Apartment for rent in St. Paul, Minnesota.
    Michael Siluk | UCG | Universal Images Group | Getty Images

    Driven by the work-from-home dynamic, as well as by new migration patterns, both single-family and multifamily rent prices were red-hot during the first years of the pandemic.
    Now different drivers are pushing some rents higher — and throwing cold water on others.

    Multifamily rents in April were 0.8% lower than they were in the same month last year, according to Apartment List. Rents cooled because a massive amount of new supply entered the market, with still more in the pipeline.
    Apartment rents did rise for the third straight month, but the growth, at 0.5%, is very small. Rents usually begin to rise in the spring, and the gain this year is not only smaller than usual but smaller than the previous month’s gain. The national median rent in April was $1,396.
    “This is typically the time of year when rent growth is accelerating heading into the busy moving season, so the fact that growth stalled this month could be a sign that the market is headed for another slow summer,” according to the Apartment List report.
    Apartment vacancies are also climbing, hitting 6.7% as of March, marking the highest reading since August 2020. New multifamily building permits are slowing down, but the number of units currently under construction is near a record high, and last year saw the most new apartments hit the market in over 30 years.
    Single-family rents are much stronger, up 3.4% in March year over year, according to a new report from CoreLogic. That annual increase, however, continues to shrink as more supply comes onto the market from build-for-rent companies.

    Roughly 18,000 single-family, built-for-rent homes were started during the first quarter, a 20% increase from the first quarter of 2023, according to an analysis of Census data by the National Association of Home Builders. Over the last four quarters, 80,000 such homes began construction, representing a nearly 16% jump from the prior four quarters.
    “U.S. single-family rent growth strengthened overall in March, though some weaknesses are revealed in the latest numbers,” said Molly Boesel, principal economist for CoreLogic. “Overbuilt areas, such as Austin, Texas, continued to soften, decreasing by 3.5% annually in March.”
    The continued strength overall in single-family rents indicates that potential homebuyers who are priced out of the home-purchase market are choosing to rent similar alternatives, according to Boesel. Mortgage rates have risen back into the 7% range, and home prices continue to rise, making it harder to buy a home.
    Of the nation’s 20 largest cities, Seattle saw the highest year-over-year increase in single-family rents at 6.3%, followed by New York at 5.3% and Boston at 5.2%. Those leading the declines were Austin, Texas, down 3.5%; Miami, down 3.2%; and New Orleans, down 1.4%.
    For the first time in 14 years, however, single-family attached properties, namely townhomes, posted a year-over-year rent decline.
    “The decrease in the attached segment is being driven by a subset of markets, mostly in Florida, but including Austin and New Orleans. As multifamily apartments are being completed, some markets are gaining rental supply, which competes with the attached segment of the single-family rental market,” Boesel added.

    Don’t miss these exclusives from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Pixar is laying off 14% of its workforce as Disney scales back content

    Pixar Animation Studios is laying off about 14% of its workforce, or around 175 employees.
    The cuts are part of Disney CEO Bob Iger’s overarching mandate to focus on the quality of its content, not the quantity.
    Pixar will refocus on theatrical releases and move away from short-form series for Disney+.

    A bicyclist rides past the entrance to the Pixar Animation Studios headquarters in Emeryville, California, U.S.
    Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Long-expected layoffs are hitting Pixar Animation Studios on Tuesday.
    Pixar will lay off about 175 employees, or around 14% of the studio’s workforce, a spokesperson for parent company Walt Disney told CNBC. The cuts come as CEO Bob Iger works toward his overarching mandate to focus on the quality of its content, not the quantity.

    Layoffs hit other Disney businesses last year, but Pixar’s cuts were delayed because of production schedules. Initially, it was reported that 20% of the animation studio’s employees would be laid off.
    Iger, who returned to the mantle of CEO in late 2022, has been working to reverse the company’s box office woes, spurred both by the company’s content decisions and pandemic shutdowns. While Disney has seen mixed box office success with several franchises, including the Marvel Cinematic Universe, the company has found it challenging to get its animated features to resonate with audiences.
    When theaters closed during the pandemic, Disney sought to pad the company’s fledgling streaming service Disney+ with content, stretching its creative teams thin and sending theatrical movies straight to digital.
    The decision trained parents to seek out new Disney titles on streaming, not theaters, even when Disney opted to return its films to the big screen. Compounding Disney’s woes, many audience members began to feel that the company’s content had grown overly existential and too concerned with social issues beyond the reach of children.
    As a result, no Disney animated feature from Pixar or Walt Disney Animation has generated more than $480 million at the global box office since 2019. For comparison, just before the pandemic, “Coco” generated $796 million globally, while “Incredibles 2” tallied $1.24 billion globally, and “Toy Story 4” snared $1.07 billion globally.

    With Iger back at the helm, Pixar will refocus on theatrical releases and move away from short-form series for Disney+.
    — CNBC’s Julia Boorstin contributed to this report

    Don’t miss these exclusives from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Nestle to launch Vital Pursuit frozen-food brand targeting GLP-1 users

    Nestle plans to launch a frozen-food brand Vital Pursuit aimed at consumers who are taking Ozempic and Wegovy.
    GLP-1 drugs have taken off for weight loss and diabetes treatment, sparking investor concern over food companies’ future sales.
    “The consumer research shows that there are certain nutrients and certain macros that need to be delivered to actually help the consumers stay healthy along the journey of the GLP-1 treatment,” Nestle’s North America CEO Steve Presley told CNBC.

    Vital Pursuit’s Garlic Herb Grilled Chicken Bowl
    Source: Nestle North America

    Nestle is launching a new frozen-food brand, Vital Pursuit, aimed at the growing market of consumers who are using GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy.
    Over the last year, the buzzy weight loss and diabetes drugs have taken off as more options hit the market and as celebrities like Oprah Winfrey and Elon Musk endorse them.

    Roughly one in eight adults in the U.S. reported using a GLP-1 drug at some point, according to a recent survey from health policy research organization KFF. Roughly half of those Americans, or around 6% of U.S. adults, are currently using one of the treatments.
    The total number of U.S. consumers taking the medication could soar to 31.5 million, or 9% of the total population, by 2035, according to research from Morgan Stanley.
    As the drugs’ popularity has soared, investors have grown concerned about what their rise means for food and beverage companies and fast-food chains. People who take the medication typically eat less frequently because they have fewer cravings and desire more protein and less sugary and fatty foods. In October, Walmart U.S. CEO John Furner told Bloomberg that people who pick up GLP-1 drugs from its pharmacies are buying less food, typically with fewer calories.
    But Nestle sees an opportunity to cater to those consumers through Vital Pursuit.
    “The reality is, for the last 25 years, the diet has been dying, in a sense. … For me, what we’ve done is actually given consumers a new tool that actually gives them confidence and success on this journey,” Nestle’s North America CEO Steve Presley told CNBC.

    The new brand’s initial lineup of 12 items will include frozen bowls with whole grains or protein-packed pasta, along with sandwich melts and pizzas. The products will include one or more essential nutrients, like protein, calcium or iron. The company plans to sell Vital Pursuit items for $4.99 or under and offer gluten-free options.
    Vital Pursuit’s packaging won’t include mentions of GLP-1 medications, but Nestle said the company will more directly connect the brand to the drugs on social media.
    The new line will hit the freezer aisle by the fourth quarter.
    In recent years, Nestle has also tried to focus more on health-conscious consumers. In 2018, it sold its U.S. candy business, which includes brands like Butterfinger, Crunch and Laffy Taffy, to Ferrero for $2.8 billion. Nestle’s food business, which includes brands like Stouffer’s and Toll House, only accounts for 14.5% of its U.S. sales.
    Nestle already owns Lean Cuisine, which was founded in 1981 as a healthier alternative to other frozen meals. The company chose to create a new brand to reach GLP-1 users because Lean’s branding focuses on consumers looking to limit their calories. However, people who take GLP-1 medications may want to consume more nutrients, such as protein, which can help with the muscle loss associated with the drugs. 
    “The consumer research shows that there are certain nutrients and certain macros that need to be delivered to actually help the consumers stay healthy along the journey of the GLP-1 treatment,” Presley said.
    Shares of Swiss-based Nestle have fallen 16% this year, dragging its market value down to $278 billion. The food company expects that its global growth will slow this year as inflation-weary consumers buy less of its products.

    Don’t miss these exclusives from CNBC PRO More