More stories

  • in

    Buy now, stock up or delay: Here’s what consumers are snapping up or putting off in face of tariffs

    Tariffs have fueled car purchases across the country and some iPhone upgrades, too.
    Yet in other categories, U.S. consumers have delayed rather than sped up purchases, according to surveys by market research firms and a recent Federal Reserve report.
    Procter & Gamble CFO Andre Schulten said Thursday that tariffs have contributed to “a more nervous consumer” who pulled back in the last two months of the quarter.

    In an aerial view, Ford Broncos are seen for sale on a lot at a dealership on April 18, 2025 in Austin, Texas.
    Brandon Bell | Getty Images

    At car dealerships across the country, consumers are rushing to buy new vehicles ahead of tariff-related price hikes. Some shoppers have also replaced iPhones early.
    Yet when it comes to other items, retailers aren’t seeing widespread stock-ups or huge waves of early purchases due to tariffs — or at least not yet. Instead, U.S. shoppers seem hesitant to spend and inclined to delay purchases rather than speed them up, according to consumer surveys by market researchers and early reads from the Federal Reserve.

    Consumer spending, excluding autos, was lower overall across the country, according to the Federal Reserve’s latest Beige Book report on economic conditions released on Wednesday. Five of the Fed’s districts saw slight growth in economic activity, four districts had slight to modest declines and three reported relatively unchanged trends since the central bank’s previous release in early March.
    Most districts saw moderate to robust sales of vehicles and some nondurable items, which the report attributed to “a rush to purchase ahead of tariff-related price increases.” Yet both leisure and business travel were down, and the report noted that “uncertainty around international trade policy was pervasive across [district] reports.”
    Beyond some of the pricier purchases that stand to cost a lot more even under a 10% tariff on imports, early data suggests the duties have intensified consumers’ desire to watch their wallets closely as they wait to see how Trump’s trade policy unfolds. Companies from Chipotle to PepsiCo and American Airlines said this week that they’re seeing pockets of slower spending.
    U.S. shoppers have adopted “a conservation mentality” for their cash as they follow fast-changing headlines and see wild swings in the stock market — and their savings and retirement accounts, said Steve Zurek, vice president of thought leadership at NielsenIQ.
    “There’s so much uncertainty right now that shoppers just don’t know what to do,” he said. “There’s nowhere to hide here — all they can do is control the household economics they have.”

    Some survey results have backed up a theory that shoppers are kicking the can rather than accelerating purchases: about 35% of U.S. consumers said they planned to put off a major purchase, such as a home, car, appliance or furniture because of tariffs, according to a NielsenIQ survey. That compares with just 7% who said they anticipated making a major purchase now to avoid the possibility of a higher price later. The market researcher conducted the survey in late March, days before Trump unveiled steep tariffs on dozens of countries, almost all of which he later lowered for 90 days.
    In another reflection of consumer caution, along with higher mortgage rates, home sales in March fell to the slowest pace since 2009, according to the National Association of Realtors.
    Retailers, airlines, car manufacturers and more will be watching consumer behavior closely as they try to predict demand and buy inventory. Some of those companies have accelerated their own orders of longer-lasting and pricier durable goods, such as equipment, to beat tariff-related price hikes.
    Here’s a look at what we know so far about consumers’ early response to tariffs.

    Early buying

    In tariff fear-buying, one category stands out: cars.
    The auto sector outperformed the rest of the retail market in March, as sales excluding motor vehicles and parts increased 0.5%, while sales in the auto sector jumped 5.3%, the Commerce Department reported last week.
    While Trump eased additional tariffs on many countries that export goods to the U.S., he has kept a 25% levy on all imported vehicles.
    Consumers are rushing to showrooms to try to save thousands of dollars on a new vehicle.
    Cox Automotive estimates the 25% tariff on non-U.S. assembled vehicles will increase the average cost of imported vehicles by $6,000, while the cost of vehicles assembled in the U.S. will rise by $3,600 due to upcoming 25% tariffs on automotive parts. Those are in addition to $300 to $500 hikes as a result of previously announced tariffs on steel and aluminum.
    Automotive executives and dealers reported significant gains in showroom traffic and sales once Trump confirmed the tariffs late last month and into April.
    “Concerns about potential future vehicle prices due to tariffs led to a surge in March sales, and April began with similar robustness,” said Charlie Chesbrough, senior economist at Cox Automotive.
    New vehicle sales were running 22% above the seasonally adjusted pace of last year and were up more than 8% through early April on a volume basis, according to Cox.
    “It’s been busy. Everybody’s buying now because they’re afraid the prices are going up,” said Craig DeSerf, executive manager of Gulf Coast Chevrolet Buick GMC in Texas. “There’s kind of been a little bit of a buying frenzy, like almost a replay of Covid.”
    Michael Bettenhausen, a dealer in Illinois and chair of the Stellantis dealer council, said there’s “no doubt” there has been a big pull ahead in sales due to the tariffs.
    “It’s taken a little bit extra effort … to get the consumer to understand that the tariffs haven’t impacted us yet,” he said. “Our inventory on the ground is tariff-free. Obviously if you’re in the market and you’re looking to buy in the next 30 to 60 days, you’ll probably want to be doing it sooner rather than later.”
    Higher sales are good for the automotive industry, after many analysts expected them to be roughly flat heading into the year. But there’s concern that sales could come to a grinding halt once automakers and dealers sell out of their tariff-free inventories.
    “Inventory levels have declined substantially over recent weeks, likely pushing vehicle prices higher, so the end of April may not be as strong,” Chesbrough said. “With economic concerns rising and consumer confidence declining, the outlook for new auto sales from here is more troubling.”
    Automotive vehicles topped the list of purchases that U.S. consumers reported that they made earlier than they otherwise would have because of tariffs, according to a survey by GlobalData of nearly 5,800 adults across the country in late March and early April.
    Nearly 12% said tariffs had sped up their car purchase, followed by close to 10% of people who reported buying furniture earlier than planned and nearly 9% who reported purchasing large electronics.

    Stockpiling

    Yet when it comes to a wider range of merchandise like paper towels, clothing and more, there hasn’t been a meaningful rush to stock up.
    Walmart Chief Financial Officer John David Rainey told reporters earlier this month at an investor day in Dallas that the nation’s largest retailer hasn’t seen “pandemic-like buying from our customers.”
    He said the company saw consumers bulk ordering in some stores ahead of the port strike last fall, but hasn’t seen that now. But he did tell investors that the big-box retailer’s sales patterns have become less predictable week to week and even day to day.
    “It’s just more volatility than what we typically see in our business,” he said, adding that bumpier consumer spending continued into April.
    He attributed that to a mix of factors, including weaker consumer sentiment in February, poor weather in March and delayed timing of tax refunds.
    Chris Nicholas, CEO of Walmart-owned Sam’s Club, told CNBC in an interview earlier this month that the warehouse club has not seen “any material change” when it comes to early purchases of items like appliances and consumer electronics.
    A later Easter than a year ago has muddled sales results, too. Total spending rose to 3.8% for April through April 15 compared with about 2.7% in March, according to data from JPMorgan. A note from the bank attributed that to the “Easter effect,” since the holiday fell on March 31 a year ago.
    That made the sales jumps look bigger leading up to this year’s Easter on April 20, since consumers tend to shop more ahead of the holiday.
    Walmart’s Rainey said at the investor day that the discounter anticipated April would be its strongest month of the quarter because of the timing of Easter.
    Even so, tariffs may have fueled some early purchases in April. Along with Easter’s timing shift, JPMorgan’s note credited “possible ‘binge’ purchases in anticipation of tariffs.”
    Store visits increased year over year the first two full weeks in April at superstores, grocers and clothing retailers, according to Placer.ai, which tracks retail foot traffic. Yet store visits declined year over year at home improvement and furniture stores, the company found.

    Delaying purchases and seeking deals

    Whether consumers are shopping for everyday items like laundry detergent or booking an airline ticket, tariffs have made them reluctant to spend and more likely to hunt for deals, executives have said.
    Procter & Gamble CFO Andre Schulten on Thursday said on a call with reporters that tariffs have led to “a more nervous consumer” who pulled back on spending in the last two months of the quarter.
    “It’s not illogical to see the consumer adopt the ‘wait and see’ attitude, and we saw traffic down at retailers,” Schulten said. “We saw consumers basically looking for value, migrating into online, bigger box retail, into club [retailers].”
    Outside of retailers’ aisles, more price-sensitive customers are pulling back on domestic airline bookings, industry executives said this month. Carriers are turning to fare sales to fill seats on domestic flights and trimming their schedules to shed excess capacity, though some warn revenue could fall this quarter from last year.
    Airfare fell 5.3% in March after a 4% decline in February, according to the latest federal data.
    Airline CEOs went into 2025 optimistic for a blockbuster year, but some have recently said demand started to weaken among government, corporate and economy-class leisure travel segments in February. Executives say economic uncertainty is keeping some customers on the sidelines.
    Some industry executives noticed the weakening of business travel demand in recent months amid the trade war, volatile markets and mass government layoffs. Delta Air Lines CEO Ed Bastian said on April 9 that in addition to weaker domestic leisure bookings, corporate travel demand — which started the year up 10% from 2024 — had turned flat.
    At the same time, high-end travel demand from first class to premium economy, and outbound international demand have proven more resilient, airlines executives say.
    Delta reported earlier this month that its domestic unit revenue fell 3% in the first quarter from a year earlier, while trans-Atlantic unit sales rose 8%. International flights make up a smaller share of the carrier’s overall ticket sales than domestic trips, however.
    American Airlines on Thursday joined Alaska Airlines, Southwest Airlines and Delta in pulling its 2025 financial outlook. United Airlines took the unusual step of offering two forecasts, one if things are stable and one if the economy shrinks. But either way, it expects to make money this year.
    American’s vice chair and chief strategy officer, Steve Johnson, said Thursday on an earnings call that the carrier has logged “significant weakness in the part of our business that’s very sensitive to economic conditions … for whom travel is really discretionary.”
    “In those circumstances, you do see prices that are lower,” he said. “That’s going to continue to be the case until we understand … which direction the economy is going.”
    Alaska Airlines warned Wednesday that weaker demand will eat into second-quarter earnings.
    CFO Shane Tackett told CNBC that demand hasn’t plunged, but the carrier has lowered some fares to fill seats.
    “The fares aren’t as strong as they were in the fourth quarter of last year and coming into January and first part of February,” he said in an interview Wednesday. “Demand is still quite high for the industry, but it’s just not at the peak that we all anticipated might continue coming out of last year.”
    Retailers will kick off earnings season and share their latest numbers starting in mid-May.
    NielsenIQ’s Zurek anticipates that U.S. consumers will spend less and save more in the coming months because of skittishness about the economic outlook and prices. During the pandemic, personal savings rates spiked as Americans had fewer ways to spend their money, according to the St. Louis Fed.
    “When a shopper or a consumer is not sure what kind of financial punches they’re going to be taking in the future, they’re going to try to hoard cash,” he said.
    Dallas resident Tiffany Armstrong is an example of that. The attorney said she is delaying a planned kitchen remodel until she has a clearer picture of how much new kitchen appliances and construction-related materials will cost.
    “Between the uncertainty with pricing and the [stock] market, it doesn’t seem like a wise time,” she said.
    Still, she made one exception by running to a nearby AT&T store to spring for an earlier-than-planned purchase of a new iPhone.
    Days later, in a move that underscores how hard it is for consumers and businesses to plan, those Apple iPhones were exempted from tariffs.
    — CNBC’s Amelia Lucas contributed to this report.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Trump tariffs will hurt lower income Americans more than the rich, study says

    Tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump are expected to raise costs on products for U.S. consumers.
    However, tariffs would hurt lower income households with a minimal impact on the top one percent of earners in 2026, according to an analysis by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.

    Shipping containers at the Port of Seattle on April 16, 2025.
    David Ryder/Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Tariffs levied by President Donald Trump during his second term would hurt the poorest U.S. households more than the richest over the short term, according to a new analysis.
    Tariffs are a tax that importers pay on foreign goods. Economists expect consumers to shoulder at least some of that tax burden in the form of higher prices, depending on how businesses pass along the costs.

    In 2026, taxes for the poorest 20% of households would rise about four times more than those in the top 1%, if the current tariff policies were to stay in place. Those were findings according to an analysis published Wednesday by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.

    For the bottom 20% of households — who will have incomes of less than $29,000 in 2026 — the tariffs will impose a tax increase equal to 6.2% of their income that year, on average, according to ITEP’s analysis.
    Meanwhile, those in the top 1%, with an income of more than $915,000 a year, would see their taxes rise 1.7% relative to their income, on average, ITEP found.
    Economists analyze the financial impact of policy relative to household income because it illustrates how their disposable income — and quality of life — are impacted.

    Taxes by ‘another name’

    “Tariffs are just taxes on Americans by another name,” researchers at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, wrote in 2017, during Trump’s first term.

    “[They] raise the price of food and clothing, which make up a larger share of a low-income household’s budget,” they wrote, adding: “In fact, cutting tariffs could be the biggest tax cut low-income families will ever see.”
    Meanwhile, there’s already evidence that some retailers are raising costs.
    A recent analysis by the Yale Budget Lab also found that Trump tariffs are a “regressive” policy, meaning they hurt those at the bottom more than the top.  
    More from Personal Finance:Consumers are spending as trade wars raise recession oddsConsumers make financial changes in response to tariffsCan tariff revenue replace income tax?
    The short-term tax burden of tariffs is about 2.5 times greater for those at the bottom, the Yale analysis found. It examined tariffs and retaliatory trade measures through April 15.
    “Lower income consumers are going to get pinched more by tariffs,” said Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Yale Budget Lab and former chief economist at the White House Council of Economic Advisers during the Biden administration.
    Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said tariffs may lead to a “one-time price adjustment” for consumers. But he also coupled trade policy as part of a broader White House economic agenda that includes a forthcoming legislative package of tax cuts.

    “We’re also working on the tax bill and for working Americans, I believe that the reduction in taxes is going to be substantially more,” Bessent said April 2.
    It’s also unclear how current tariff policy might change. The White House has signaled trade deals with certain nations and exemptions for certain products may be in the offing.
    Trump has imposed a 10% tariff on imports from most U.S. trading partners. Mexico and Canada face 25% levies on a tranche of goods, and many Chinese goods face import duties of 145%. Specific products also face tariffs, like a 25% duty on aluminum, steel and automobiles. More

  • in

    Private jet demand declines as tariffs spook would-be buyers

    Even well-heeled travelers are pulling back due to economic uncertainty, according to a new survey from Barclays.
    Customer interest in buying private jets has plummeted by 49% since March.
    However, private jet manufacturers could get a shot in the arm from Congress.

    A Cessna Citation jet aircraft is viewed at Charles M. Schulz Sonoma County Airport in this aerial photo taken on June 1, 2021, near Healdsburg, California.
    George Rose | Getty Images

    With consumer confidence tumbling, demand for commercial air travel has waned. Even deep-pocketed travelers are pulling back, according to Barclays’ latest survey of business jet broker-dealers and financiers.
    Customer interest in buying business jets has fallen by 49% since March, according to the survey, which was conducted from April 9 to 15 and had 65 respondents.

    The Barclays Business Jet Indicator survey, published last week, uses five metrics, including 12-month outlook and pricing, to assess the state of the market. All but one metric (inventory levels) declined from mid-March to mid-April. As a result, the composite score fell from 52 to 40.
    The percentage drop recorded in the most recent survey, at 23%, is the largest recorded by Barclays since the Covid pandemic. Barclays analyst David Strauss told CNBC that he expected sentiment to weaken but not to such a large degree.
    A composite score in the low 40s indicates the market is slowing, according to Barclays.
    The indicator correlates with airplane manufacturers’ book-to-bill ratio, a key measure of their financial health. A score of 40 indicates that dollar value of manufacturers’ new orders is lagging about 10% behind the orders it is currently fulfilling, Strauss said.
    Survey respondents told Barclays that clients had put purchases on hold, fearing the impact of tariffs not only on the aircraft market but also their operating businesses.

    Get Inside Wealth directly to your inbox

    Nearly half (46%) of participants said that customer interest in buying business jets had deteriorated since March. Forty-four percent said customer interest stayed the same and only 10% reported it had improved.
    When asked specifically about the effect of tariffs on new aircraft demand, 93% of respondents said it would have a negative impact on demand, with a majority expecting the impact would be significant. Only 7% said they believed there would be no impact.
    As for used jets, 67% of respondents were still pessimistic, expecting a significant or minor negative impact on demand. A little under a third (27%) expected demand for used jets to increase by some degree.
    However, pending legislation may give business jet manufacturers a shot in the arm.
    Both the Senate and House of Representatives have adopted a budget resolution that aims to extend the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. A key provision of the TCJA allowed businesses to immediately deduct 100% of eligible equipment purchases rather than spreading out the deduction over time. The rate has dropped 20% annually since 2023 and was set to phase out in 2027. 
    Republican lawmakers now have a path to raise the rate back to 100% and allow retroactive deductions, which President Donald Trump called for in March. If they succeed in bringing back 100% bonus depreciation, private aircraft would become much more attractive from a tax perspective. 

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    T. Rowe Price sees this established strategy as way to ride out market volatility

    It appears T. Rowe Price is benefiting from the record growth in actively managed exchange-traded funds.
    Tim Coyne, the firm’s head of ETFs, reports T. Rowe Price is seeing significant growth in the area — listing the T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) and T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research ETF (TSPA) as two established strategies that can satisfy investor demand.

    “I think having that professionally managed portfolio is really beneficial to clients,” Coyne told CNBC’s “ETF Edge” this week. “We’re seeing just … greater volatility [and] uncertainty across both the equity and fixed income markets.”
    According to Coyne, the T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF suits investors who are looking for long-term growth.
    “The objective of the fund is to outperform the S&P 500 with lower volatility and greater tax efficiency,” he said. “It’s also a more concentrated portfolio, typically holding around a hundred names.”
    As of April 24, the fund’s top holdings include Microsoft, Amazon and Apple according to the T. Rowe Price website. But it’s not all Big Tech. The ETF also features smaller positions in companies like Becton Dickinson and Roper Technologies.
    The T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF is down about 5% so far this year while the S&P 500 is off about 7%. However, the ETF is up close to 8% over the past year — roughly identical to the S&P 500’s performance.

    Coyne notes the T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research ETF follows a similar strategy, but with a heavier weighting in top tech stocks.
    “This is more of a large-cap growth product [T Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research ETF],” he said. “There are components of characteristics of both passive and active here. This fund is actually managed by our North American directors of research. So again, strong fundamental research is going into the stock selection.”
    Both the T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research ETF and S&P 500 are down around 7% since the beginning of the year. Meanwhile, the fund is up almost 9% over the past year. That’s less than 1 percent better than the S&P 500’s performance.

    Stock chart icon

    T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research ETF vs. S&P 500

    ‘Some form of bear market’

    Strategas Securities’ Todd Sohn thinks investment demand for active managers will continue to be strong.
    “This is the type of the environment where it [active management] can actually shine,” the firm’s senior ETF and technical strategist said. “We are in some form of bear market. This is where the active manager really can come into hand and offer their solution they are doing right.”

    Disclaimer More

  • in

    China pledges to ramp up targeted support for businesses as U.S. trade war hits

    China plans to help struggling businesses with targeted measures in the face of “increased external shocks,” according to a readout of a meeting chaired Friday by Chinese President Xi Jinping.
    The Politburo meeting readout also called for “timely reduction” of interest rates and the reserve requirement ratio — the amount of cash banks need to have on hand.
    Policymakers are sticking with their stance from earlier this year, while indicating flexibility for targeted measures, said Zong Liang, chief researcher at Bank of China.

    Chinese President Xi Jinping attends the opening session of the National People’s Congress (NPC) at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China, March 5, 2025.
    Florence Lo | Reuters

    BEIJING — China plans to help struggling businesses with targeted measures in the face of “increased external shocks,” according to a readout of a meeting chaired Friday by President Xi Jinping.
    The meeting of the Politburo, the second most powerful political body in China, comes as tensions between Washington and Beijing have escalated this month with new tit-for-tat tariffs of more than 100%. Major Wall Street banks have cut their China GDP forecasts for the year as a result, while the country still strives to achieve its lofty goal of “around 5%” growth set in March.

    Authorities called for “multiple measures to help businesses in difficulty,” such as financial support, according to the Chinese-language readout, translated by CNBC.
    The Politburo also called for “timely reduction” of interest rates and the reserve requirement ratio — the amount of cash banks need to have on hand.
    Policymakers are sticking with their stance from earlier this year, while indicating flexibility for targeted measures, said Zong Liang, chief researcher at Bank of China. For mitigating the impact of tariffs, he expects China will do more research on specific businesses, and consider how to support them.

    In a rare move, China in March raised its deficit target to 4% of GDP. Finance Minister Lan Fo’an indicated at the time that China had more room to act on fiscal policy.
    Since the escalation in U.S. trade tensions this month, local Chinese governments and major businesses have announced efforts to help exporters redirect their products to the domestic market for sale.

    The Politburo meeting readout emphasized the need to increase the income of middle and lower-income groups, and boost services consumption. The leaders also called for further tech development, including the integration of artificial intelligence.
    “The press release shows the government is ready to launch new policies when the economy is affected by the external shock,” Zhiwei Zhang, president and chief economist at Pinpoint Asset Management, said in a note.
    “It seems Beijing is not in a rush to launch a large stimulus at this stage,” he said. “It takes time to monitor and evaluate the timing and the size of the trade shock.”

    Policy coordination

    The CSI 300 briefly turned lower and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index trimmed gains after the meeting statement was released.
    China’s Politburo, composed of high-level members of the ruling Chinese Communist Party, tends to lay out broad policy directives.
    The latest meeting reaffirmed policies from the State Council — the top executive body — and government ministries, “underscoring high-level commitment and collaboration,” said Bruce Pang, adjunct associate professor at CUHK Business School.
    “While they may not offer many unexpected and ground breaking surprises, these measures equip policymakers with tools to navigate external uncertainties,” he said, adding he expects a forthcoming private sector law to further improve the business environment.
    The standing committee of China’s parliament, the National People’s Congress, is scheduled to meet from Sunday to Wednesday, and review a new law to support the private sector.

    Weekly analysis and insights from Asia’s largest economy in your inboxSubscribe now More

  • in

    Companies from Chipotle to Delta are worried about Trump’s tariffs. Here’s what they’re saying

    A range of consumer companies are cutting their full-year forecasts, citing tariffs and a more cautious consumer.
    PepsiCo, Chipotle and Procter & Gamble are among the companies that lowered their forecasts.
    P&G, Keurig Dr Pepper and Hasbro all said Thursday that the tariffs could mean they will raise prices in the near future.

    A Chipotle store stands in the Bronx on April 23, 2025 in New York City.
    Spencer Platt | Getty Images

    From Procter & Gamble to Chipotle, consumer companies are slashing their forecasts, projecting that tariffs will weigh on their profits and put more pressure on an already shaky consumer.
    At least a dozen companies have cut or pulled their full-year outlooks so far this earnings season, with several more weeks of quarterly reports still on deck.

    For many companies, tariffs mean higher prices on key commodities, like Peruvian avocados or saccharin to make toothpaste, which will eat into their earnings. But the uncertainty bred by the trade war is just as damaging to businesses’ bottom lines as consumers pull back their spending.
    The cautious projections come in the middle of a 90-day pause of the higher rates under President Donald Trump’s so-called reciprocal tariff plan. Until early July, most imports will face a duty of 10%, excluding goods from China — which are subject to 145% duties — along with aluminum, cars and other nonexempt items.
    Still, the situation changes almost daily. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told investors in a closed-door meeting on Tuesday he expects “there will be a de-escalation” in Trump’s trade war with China in the “very near future.” The White House also said Wednesday that automakers could win exemptions for some tariffs.

    Higher prices to fight lower profits

    Packages of Cascade Platinum Plus dishwasher detergent are stacked at a Costco Wholesale store on March 11, 2025 in San Diego, California.
    Kevin Carter | Getty Images

    Under the tariffs in effect now, coffee, board games and aircraft are all more expensive for companies to make. Many executives will likely choose to raise prices to mitigate the dent to profit margins.
    “Aircraft cost too much already. I don’t want to pay any more for aircraft,” American Airlines CEO Robert Isom said Thursday. “It doesn’t make sense. And certainly, we’re pulling guidance. Certainly, this is not something we would intend to absorb. And I’ll tell you, it’s not something that I would expect our customers to welcome. So we’ve got to work on this.”

    Tariffs worldwide, including retaliatory ones and not just those in the U.S., will “really pressure” progress in improving the industry’s supply chain, Airbus Americas CEO Robin Hayes said at a Wings Club luncheon in New York on Thursday. The U.S. aerospace industry has a trade surplus, helping soften the country’s overall deficit.
    Calls are growing among airlines and aerospace suppliers to reinstate the terms of a more than 45-year-old agreement that allows the industry to operate mostly duty-free. Other industries are also pushing for exemptions from tariffs.
    But barring cuts in tariff rates or new carveouts for goods, travel isn’t the only sector that will see price hikes. P&G, Keurig Dr Pepper and Hasbro all said Thursday that they could raise prices in the near future to offset higher costs.
    “There will likely be pricing [changes] — tariffs are inherently inflationary — but we’re also looking at sourcing options,” P&G CEO Jon Moeller said on CNBC’s “Squawk Box.”
    Though it predicted costs to produce its coffee and sodas would rise, Keurig Dr Pepper did not lower its full-year forecast. The company posted strong earnings growth for the first quarter, bolstered by the sale of its minority stake in coconut water maker Vita Coco, giving the beverage giant the flexibility to reiterate its outlook.

    A ‘nervous’ consumer

    shopper scans coupons in a grocery store in Washington, D.C.
    Tom Williams | Cq-roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images

    The tariffs will take time to affect the prices on grocery store shelves and inside malls. But they’re already taking a toll on shoppers’ mentally.
    Earlier this month, U.S. consumer sentiment tumbled to its second-lowest reading since 1952. Shoppers are already pulling back their spending as they fear accelerated inflation, job losses and a potential recession, companies said this week.
    “The main driver, I would say, is a more nervous consumer reducing consumption in the short term, and the impact on the cost structure and our ability to deliver the earnings a lower growth rate,” P&G CFO Andre Schulten said on a call with media on Thursday, explaining the company’s reasoning for cutting its forecast.
    P&G, which owns top household brands like Charmin and Tide, lowered its outlook for core earnings per share and revenue for the full fiscal year, which is in its final quarter. Its third-quarter sales fell short of Wall Street’s estimates.
    “It’s not illogical to see the consumer adopt the ‘wait and see’ attitude, and we saw traffic down at retailers,” Schulten said.
    PepsiCo, another grocery store staple, cited a “subdued” consumer — along with tariffs — as the reason it cut its forecast for full-year core constant currency earnings per share.
    The anxious consumer is also weighing on Chipotle, the first of the major publicly traded restaurant companies to report its results.
    The burrito chain lowered the top end of its outlook for full-year same-store sales growth. Executives said traffic started slowing in February as diners began worrying more about their finances. The trend has continued into April.
    “We could see this in our visitation study, where saving money because of concerns around the economy was the overwhelming reason consumers were reducing the frequency of restaurant visits,” Chipotle CEO Scott Boatwright told analysts on Wednesday.
    For its part, Hasbro opted to reiterate its forecast, which gives a wide range of a $100 million to $300 million headwind to its business from tariffs. The toy company’s outlook assumes that the China tariffs could range from 50% to the current rate of 145%.
    Executives also warned of potential job losses tied to the increased costs.
    Airlines, too, are seeing weaker demand, particularly in their economy cabins. Delta Air Lines CEO Ed Bastian told CNBC in an interview earlier this month that Trump’s tariff policy at the time was the “wrong approach” and that it was hurting both domestic economy-class demand and corporate travel because of the uncertainty.
    American Airlines on Thursday pulled its 2025 financial guidance, joining Southwest Airlines, Alaska Airlines and Delta, each citing a U.S. economy that is too difficult to predict. United Airlines took the unusual step of offering two outlooks should the U.S. economy worsen, but still expects to make money this year.
    — CNBC’s Leslie Josephs contributed to this report.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    March home sales drop to their slowest pace since 2009

    Sales of previously owned homes in March fell 5.9% from February.
    Inventory was up nearly 20% from a year earlier.
    More inventory and slower sales are starting put a chill on prices.

    Higher mortgage rates and concern over the broader economy are making for a weak start to the all-important spring housing market.
    Sales of previously owned homes in March fell 5.9% from February to 4.02 million units on a seasonally adjusted annualized basis, according to the National Association of Realtors. That’s the slowest March sales pace since 2009.

    Sales were 2.4% lower than in March 2024 and slumped across all regions month to month. They fell hardest in the West, the priciest region of the country, down more than 9%. The West, however, was the only region to see a year-over-year gain, due to strong activity in the Rocky Mountain states, where job growth is strong.
    This count is based on closings, therefore contracts likely signed in January and February, when the average rate on the popular 30-year fixed mortgage was over 7%. It did not fall solidly below 7% until Feb. 20, according to Mortgage News Daily.
    “Home buying and selling remained sluggish in March due to the affordability challenges associated with high mortgage rates,” said Lawrence Yun, NAR’s chief economist. “Residential housing mobility, currently at historical lows, signals the troublesome possibility of less economic mobility for society.”
    Sales fell despite a sharp increase in available listings. At the end of March, there were 1.33 million units for sale, an increase of nearly 20% from March 2024. At the current sales pace, that is equivalent to a 4-month supply, which is still on the lean side. A 6-month supply is considered a balanced market between buyer and seller.

    A “For Sale” sign stands at a house in Miami, Florida, U.S. April 16, 2025.
    Marco Bello | Reuters

    More inventory and slower sales are starting put a chill on prices. The median price of an existing home sold in March was $403,700. That is still an all-time high for the month, but it’s only up 2.7% from last March. That annual comparison has been shrinking since December and is the smallest gain since August.

    “In a stark contrast to the stock and bond markets, household wealth in residential real estate continues to reach new heights,” Yun said. “With real estate asset valuation at $52 trillion, according to the Federal Reserve Flow of Funds, each percentage point gain in home prices adds more than $500 billion to the household balance sheet.”
    First-time buyers made up 32% of the market in March, the same as in March 2024. Historically they make up roughly 40%.
    All-cash sales dropped to 26% from 28% the year before, but investors held steady at 15% of sales.
    Looking ahead, the NAR is already reporting a rise in canceled contracts in March, and, given the stock market volatility in April, that could increase.
    “March numbers are bad, but they’re likely to get worse,” said Robert Frick, corporate economist with Navy Federal Credit Union. “In addition to the existing pressures of high prices and high mortgage rates, prices for home furnishing will likely rise soon due to tariffs, and rising anxiety among consumers over inflation and jobs may magnify the instinct to hunker down already being felt by many families.” More

  • in

    American liquor exports hit record high in 2024, driven by tariffs

    U.S. spirits exports reached a record $2.4 billion, up 10% compared with 2023.
    Exports to the European Union increased 39%, driven in large part by uncertainty around tariffs.
    Exports to the rest of the world declined by nearly 10%, reflecting a softening of the global spirits market

    FILE PHOTO: Workers package bottles of Jack Daniel’s Single Barrel Select Tennessee Whiskey at the company’s distillery in Lynchburg, Tennessee, U.S., on Tuesday, May 18, 2021.
    Luke Sharrett | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    U.S. spirit exports reached a record $2.4 billion in 2024, driven in large part by tariff concerns and ongoing global trade disputes.
    That is according to the American Spirits Exports report published by trade association the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States on Thursday.

    “U.S. spirits exports hit a new high in 2024, recapturing lost market share since the UK and EU lifted retaliatory tariffs that were applied between 2018-2021,” said DISCUS President and CEO Chris Swonger. “Unfortunately, ongoing trade disputes unrelated to our sector have caused uncertainty, keeping many U.S. distillers on the sidelines and curtailing sales growth.”
    U.S. spirits exports to the EU surged by 39%, fueled by concerns over the potential return of a 50% tariff on American whiskey imports in 2025, which was suspended in 2022.
    In March, Trump threatened to put 200% tariffs on French Champagne and other EU spirits, which led European world leaders — specifically from Ireland, France and Italy — to advocate for bourbon tariffs not to return as part of retaliatory measures.
    The threat of that specific tariff has faded somewhat as the U.S. and EU continue trade negotiations.

    Whiskey barrels are placed on a truck at the Jack Daniel Distillery in Lynchburg, Tennessee, U.S. February 3, 2025.
    Kevin Wurm | Reuters

    Approximately 50% of U.S. spirits were exported to the EU — totaling $1.2 billion — making it the largest export market.

    Exports to the rest of the world, however, declined by nearly 10%, the report found, which reflects the broader softening alcohol category.
    Suntory Beam, the Japanese maker of Jim Beam bourbon whiskey, said in December it was preparing for tariffs by stockpiling supply in Europe. The company is already heavily reliant on France and the United Kingdom, which make up over 50% of its global exports market over the last eight years, according to global trade data from Panjiva.
    Several of the top states for exports in 2024 are significant bourbon economies, according to the report.
    Top 5 states exporting U.S. spirits: 

    Tennessee ($934 million)
    Kentucky ($751 million)
    Texas ($354 million)
    Florida ($334 million)
    Indiana ($142 million)

    Still, American whiskey exports, which accounted for 54% of all U.S. spirits exports, dipped 5.4% to $1.3 billion.
    Swonger said that while outlook for spirits remains highly unpredictable with ongoing trade disputes, one fact rings true in the data: Exports go to countries that have eliminated tariffs.
    “We are thankful for President Trump’s early success in securing India’s reduction of its tariff on Bourbon from 150% to 100%,” Swonger said. “It’s our hope that the administration builds on this positive momentum by securing additional tariff reductions in India and reducing trade barriers in other countries.”
    Headwinds remain for the industry. Canada, the second largest market for U.S. spirits exports, imposed a 25% tariff in on alcohol coming over the border in March, and several provinces have removed product from shelves.
    Distiller and brewers also face steel and aluminum tariffs that impact materials costs for brewers like Constellation Brands, which lowered long-term 2027 and 2028 guidance significantly around “the anticipated impact of tariffs.” More