More stories

  • in

    Databricks closes in on multibillion funding round at $55 billion valuation to help employees cash out

    Databricks is in the middle of a mega funding round, several people familiar with the matter told CNBC. 
    The data analytics and AI company is raising at least $5 billion in cash, pegging its new valuation at $55 billion, according to the sources.
    The software company is already one of Silicon Valley’s most valuable private startups and has been viewed as a potential IPO candidate.
    But this funding round pushes its public debut prospects further down the road, one source told CNBC. 

    Ali Ghodsi, co-founder and chief executive officer of Databricks Inc., speaks during a Bloomberg Technology television interview in San Francisco on Oct. 22, 2019.
    David Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    One of the world’s most valuable private tech companies is raising billions more in cash and is in no rush to go public, sources told CNBC. 
    San Francisco-based Databricks is raising at least another $5 billion in its latest funding round, though it could raise up to $8 billion given the round is ongoing, according to several people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be named because the discussions were private. The latest raise would value the company at $55 billion and could top the largest round of the year, by OpenAI.

    The latest funding is designed to help Databricks employees sell shares, one of the people said. Reducing pressure from employees to cash out also reduces the need for a liquidity event such as an IPO. One source said the funding round makes Databricks’ highly anticipated public debut less urgent. But it could still happen in the back half of next year.
    Databricks was founded in 2013 and sells software that helps enterprises organize data and build their own generative AI products. It uses machine learning to help clients from AT&T to Walgreens parse and make sense of massive troves of data. 
    This equity round could be the largest in a banner year for artificial intelligence funding, when 1 in 3 venture dollars has gone to an AI startup, according to CB Insights. OpenAI holds the record in 2024, raising $6.6 billion in October at a $157 billion valuation.
    Databricks last raised $500 million at a $43 billion valuation. It’s backed by Nvidia, Capital One, Andreessen Horowitz, Baillie Gifford, Fidelity, Insight Partners, Tiger Global and others. 
    The Information first reported that Databricks was raising money.

    The firm has capitalized on the momentum in artificial intelligence. This summer, it acquired MosaicML, a $1.3 billion software startup that focuses on large language models that can churn out natural-sounding text. Databricks told investors earlier this year that annualized revenue would hit $2.4 billion by the midpoint of 2024.
    Its decision to stay private comes as software stocks have struggled to get out of a rut brought on by higher interest rates. Shares of rival Snowflake are down 13% this year. While its fellow software IPO candidates such as Stripe have taken significant haircuts on valuations, Databricks has grown its value while expanding its employee base. 
    CEO Ali Ghodsi said at a conference Nov. 20 that he’s optimizing for the success of Databricks over the next decade or two, not optimizing for an IPO.
    “If we were going to go, the earliest would be, let’s say, mid-next year, or something like that,” Ghodsi said at Newcomer’s Cerebral Valley AI Conference. “So, you know, could happen next year.”
    A Databricks spokesperson declined to comment.
    Correction: OpenAI raised $6.6 billion in October at a $157 billion valuation. A previous version of this article misstated the valuation amount. More

  • in

    Nordstrom tops Wall Street’s earnings expectations, as shoppers buy more clothes and shoes

    Nordstrom beat Wall Street’s revenue expectations and delivered a slightly rosier full-year sales outlook.
    The retailer’s sales growth is notable at a time when discretionary merchandise and the luxury sector have been under pressure.
    Clothing and shoe purchases lifted the company’s performance, with sales of women’s apparel and activewear jumping by double digits year over year.

    A sign marks the location of a Nordstrom store in a shopping mall on March 20, 2024 in Chicago, Illinois. 
    Scott Olson | Getty Images

    Nordstrom on Tuesday beat Wall Street’s quarterly sales expectations, as revenue grew about 4% year over year from shoppers buying clothing, shoes and activewear at both the company’s namesake department store and its off-price chain.
    Yet despite its better-than-expected quarter, the Seattle-based retailer gave only a slightly rosier full-year sales forecast — taking a conservative stance as it gears up for the busiest weeks of the holiday season. The company said it now expects full-year revenue, which includes retail sales and credit card revenue, to range from flat to up 1% for the full year. That compares to its previous range of a 1% decline to 1% growth. However, it stuck by its adjusted earnings outlook for the year of between $1.75 and $2.05 per share. 

    In a news release, CEO Erik Nordstorm said the company’s results show efforts to appeal to selective shoppers are paying off. Sales of women’s apparel and activewear shot up by double digits year over year. Shoes, men’s apparel and kids grew by mid-to-high single digits year over year. 
    Compared with the second quarter, women’s apparel, shoes and men’s apparel sales in the fiscal third quarter also grew sequentially.
    “Our customers have a lot of choices, and our results give us encouragement that we’re on the right path,” he said. “Looking ahead, we’ll continue to improve our shopping experience as we strive to maintain the positive momentum we’ve worked towards all year.”
    On the company’s earnings call, however, he said Nordstrom saw “a noticeable decline in sales trends towards the end of October.” It factored that slowdown into its holiday expectations, he said.
    Here is how Nordstrom did in the three-month period that ended Nov. 2 compared to what Wall Street anticipated, based on a survey of analysts by LSEG:

    Earnings per share: 33 cents adjusted, it was not immediately clear if it was comparable with analysts’ estimates
    Revenue: $3.46 billion vs. $3.35 billion expected

    Nordstrom’s net income for the fiscal third quarter was $46 million, or 27 cents per share, compared with $67 million, or 41 cents per share, in the year-ago period. Revenue rose from $3.32 billion in the year-ago quarter.
    After excluding a charge related to accelerated depreciation of technology, Nordstrom reported adjusted earnings per share of 33 cents.
    Comparable sales increased 4% across Nordstrom’s two brands, its namesake and its off-price chain, Nordstrom Rack. That easily topped analysts’ expectations for 0.7% gains in comparable sales, according to StreetAccount.
    Nordstrom’s sales growth, while modest, is notable at a time when sales of discretionary merchandise and the luxury category have been under pressure. Retailers including Walmart, Best Buy and Target have reported over the past week that customers remain choosy when it comes to buying items that are wants, not needs, and have paid more attention to price. 
    Nordstrom’s sales growth also grew, despite a calendar shift with its Anniversary Sale. In the year-ago quarter, eight days of the sale fell into the three-month period, but only one day fell in the quarter this year. That had a negative impact on net sales of about 1%.
    Macy’s, which postponed its full earnings, said third-quarter sales fell 2.4% and comparable sales for its owned and licensed businesses plus online marketplace dropped 1.3%,
    Nordstrom has leaned on its off-price chain, Nordstrom Rack, to drive both sales growth and new store locations. Yet in the third quarter, the two banners reported similar comparable sales – with the namesake store’s up 4% and Nordstrom Rack up 3.9%.
    So far this year, Nordstrom has opened 23 new Nordstrom Rack stores, which lines up with the company’s plans to open 20 to 25 new Racks per year.
    At the end of the quarter, the company launched store fulfillment for online orders at Nordstrom Rack in over 100 stores across the country, CEO Erik Nordstrom said on the company’s earnings call. He said the company also launched a new feature which allows customers to buy online and pickup in store, at the same stores.
    Digital sales rose 6.4% year over year and in the quarter, e-commerce accounted for about a third of total sales.
    Erik Nordstrom said the company added better search and discovery features to its website and app, which supported online growth in the quarter. He said it also added more items that are under $100 in price and expanded its third-party marketplace business, which now has over 300 sellers.
    Nordstrom’s latest quarterly update comes about two months after Nordstrom’s founding family made a fresh bid to take the company private. According to a filing in September, CEO Erik Nordstrom, President Peter Nordstrom and Mexican retailer El Puerto de Liverpool sent a non-binding letter to form an entity that would buy the chain for $23 per share. 
    Shares of the company have shot up since a Reuters report in March that Nordstrom’s founding family wanted to take the company private. As of Tuesday’s close, the company’s stock has risen 32% so far this year, outpacing the S&P 500’s 26% gains. More

  • in

    Automaker shares fall as Trump threatens 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada

    Automaker shares dropped on Tuesday after President-elect Donald Trump threatened a 25% tariff on goods from Mexico and Canada.
    Companies like General Motors and Stellantis have major manufacturing presences in Mexico and Canada.
    Trump had been expected to renegotiate the regional trade deal he reached during his first term.

    A carrier trailer transports Toyota cars for delivery while queuing at the border customs control to cross into the U.S., at the Otay border crossing in Tijuana, Mexico May 31, 2019.
    Jorge Duenes | REUTERS

    DETROIT – Shares of automakers General Motors and Stellantis fell Tuesday after President-elect Donald Trump threatened to put 25% tariffs on goods imported from Canada and Mexico into the U.S.
    Such tariffs would have a major impact on the global automotive industry, which has used the countries, particularly Mexico, for lower-cost production of vehicles since the North American Free Trade Agreement went into effect in 1994.

    UBS reports the automotive industry is responsible for 26% of imports from Mexico to the U.S., including vehicles and parts, and 12% from Canada.
    Nearly every major automaker operating in the U.S. has factories in Mexico, however GM and Stellantis produce highly profitable full-size pickup trucks there.
    Shares of GM, which has five large assembly plants in the countries that Barclays estimates will produce 1 million vehicles this year, on Tuesday closed down 9% to $54.79 per share.

    Stock chart icon

    Shares of GM, Ford and Stellantis.

    Chrysler parent Stellantis, which has four major plants in the countries, dropped 5.7% to close at $12.61 per share. Shares of Ford Motor, which has less exposure in the countries but does produce vehicles in both, closed down 2.6% to $11.10 per share. Stocks of Toyota Motor, Honda Motor and others with production in Mexico closed down 3% or less.
    Trump announced he intends to levy a 25% tariff on all U.S. imports from Canada and Mexico using an executive order when he is inaugurated on Jan. 20. He also announced plans to raise tariffs by an additional 10% on all Chinese goods coming into the U.S.

    Such tariffs would be more aggressive than what was expected to be Trump’s plan, a renegotiation of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, which he hashed out during his first term to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement. Such a move would end the regional free trade deal.
    Spokespeople for GM and Stellantis declined to comment Tuesday on the potential tariffs. The American Automotive Policy Council, a lobbying group for the two automakers and Ford, did not immediately respond for comment.
    “The obvious fact here is Ford is the most committed to building in America among the major automakers and it’s not that close. We assemble the most vehicles, employ the most America workers and export the most vehicles from America to other markets,” Ford said in an emailed statement.

    Wall Street analysts viewed Trump’s announced tariff plans as a shot across the bow at the countries to create leverage in any upcoming negotiations.
    “Our view is that the threat of tariffs is the instrument Trump would use to extract from other countries the economic and political outcomes that he considers best for America,” BofA Securities’ Carlos Capistran said in a Tuesday note. “We expect Canada and Mexico to show willingness to negotiate on the above issues to avoid tariffs.”
    Barclays’ Dan Levy agreed in an investor note Monday night: “We view [the] announcement as largely negotiation tactics (as seen in 2016), and see such magnitude of tariffs unlikely.”
    Trump and Democrats alike said they believe the trade deal needs to be changed to address potential plans for Chinese manufacturers such as BYD.
    Trump floated several tariff proposals during his campaign, including calling for a more than 200% duty or tax to be levied on imported vehicles from Mexico. He also has threatened, as he did during his first term in office, to increase tariffs on European vehicles.
    – CNBC’s Michael Bloom contributed to this report.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Fed officials see interest rate cuts ahead, but only ‘gradually,’ meeting minutes show

    Federal Reserve officials expressed confidence that inflation is easing and the labor market is strong, allowing for further interest rate cuts albeit at a gradual pace, according to minutes from the November meeting released Tuesday.
    The meeting summary contained multiple statements indicating that officials are comfortable with the pace of inflation, even though by most measures it remains above the Fed’s 2% goal.

    With that in mind, and with conviction that the jobs picture is still fairly solid, Federal Open Market Committee members indicated that further rate cuts likely will happen, though they did not specify when and to what degree.
    “In discussing the outlook for monetary policy, participants anticipated that if the data came in aboutas expected, with inflation continuing to move down sustainably to 2 percent and the economyremaining near maximum employment, it would likely be appropriate to move gradually toward a more neutral stance of policy over time,” the minutes said.
    The FOMC voted unanimously at the meeting to take down its benchmark borrowing rate by a quarter percentage point to a target range of 4.5%-4.75%. Markets expect the Fed could cut again in December, though conviction has waned among concerns that President-elect Donald Trump’s plans for tariffs could stoke inflation higher.
    The meeting concluded two days after the contentious presidential election campaign resulted in the Republican emerging as the victor and set to begin serving his second term in January.There was no mention of the election in the minutes, save for a staff notation that stock market volatility rose before the Nov. 5 results and fell after. There also was no discussion of the implications of fiscal policy, despite anticipation that Trump’s plans, which also include lower taxes and aggressive deregulation, could have substantial economic impacts.
    However, members did note a general level of uncertainty about how conditions are evolving. In addition, they expressed uncertainty over where the rate cuts would need to stop before the Fed hit a “neutral” interest rate that neither boosts nor restrains growth.

    “Many participants observed that uncertainties concerning the level of the neutral rate of interest complicated the assessment of the degree of restrictiveness of monetary policy and, in their view, made it appropriate to reduce policy restraint gradually,” the minutes said.
    Conflicting signals on inflation and the uncertainty over Trump’s policies have caused traders to scale back their outlook for interest rate cuts ahead. The market-implied probability of a rate trim in December has drifted below 60%, with an expectation of just three-quarters of a percentage point in reductions through the end of the 2025.
    Committee members appeared to spend much of the meeting talking about progress on inflation and a generally stable economic outlook.
    Policymakers in recent days have expressed confidence that current inflation readings are being boosted by shelter cost increases that are expected to slow as the pace of rent rises eases and makes its way through the data.
    “Almost all participants judged that, though month-to-month movements would remain volatile, incoming data generally remained consistent with inflation returning sustainably to 2 percent,” the document said.”Participants cited various factors likely to put continuing downward pressure on inflation, including waning business pricing power, the Committee’s still-restrictive monetary policy stance, and well-anchored longer-term inflation expectations,” it added.
    Policymakers had been expressing concern about the labor market. Nonfarm payrolls rose only 12,000 in October, though the meager gain has been attributed primarily to storms in the Southeast and labor strikes.
    Officials indicated that the state of the labor market is generally solid.
    “Participants generally noted … that there was no sign of rapid deterioration in labor market conditions, with layoffs remaining low,” the minutes said.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    How President-elect Donald Trump’s policies may affect investors in these 8 market sectors

    FA Playbook

    President-elect Donald Trump’s policy agenda, from tariffs to deregulation, carries risks and rewards for different investment sectors, market experts said.
    Here are the big factors that may impact autos, banks, building materials and construction, crypto, energy, health care, retail, and technology.

    President-elect Donald Trump at a viewing of a test-flight launch of the SpaceX Starship rocket in Brownsville, Texas, Nov. 19, 2024.
    Brandon Bell | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    As Inauguration Day nears, investors are trying to unravel what booms or busts lay ahead under President-elect Donald Trump.
    Trump’s campaign promises — from tariffs to mass deportations, tax cuts and deregulation — and his picks to lead federal agencies suggest both risks and rewards for various investment sectors, according to market experts.  

    Republican control of both chambers of Congress may grant Trump greater leeway to enact his pledges, experts said. However, their scope and timing is far from clear.

    More from FA Playbook:

    Here’s a look at other stories impacting the financial advisor business.

    “There’s so much uncertainty right now,” said Jeremy Goldberg, a certified financial planner, portfolio manager and research analyst at Professional Advisory Services, which ranked No. 37 on CNBC’s annual Financial Advisor 100 list.
    “I wouldn’t be making large bets one way or another,” Goldberg said.

    Sectors often fare differently than expected

    Past market results show why it’s difficult to predict the sectors that may win or lose under a new president, according to Larry Adam, chief investment officer at Raymond James.
    When Trump was elected in 2016, financials, industrials and energy outperformed the S&P 500 in the first week. However, for the remaining three years and 51 weeks, those same sectors significantly underperformed, Adam said.

    “The market is known to have these knee-jerk reactions trying to anticipate where things go very quickly, but they don’t necessarily last,” Adam said.

    What’s more, sectors that are expected to do well or badly based on a president’s policies have sometimes gone the opposite way, according to Adam.
    For example, the energy sector was down by 8.4% during Trump’s first administration, despite deregulation, record oil production and a rise in oil prices. Yet the energy sector climbed 22.9% under Biden as of Nov. 19, despite the administration’s push for renewables and sustainability.
    For that reason, Raymond James ranks politics eighth for its potential impact on sectors. The seven factors that have more influence, according to the firm, are economic growth, fundamentals, monetary policy, interest rates and inflation, valuations, sentiment and corporate activity.
    Here’s how Trump’s policy stances could influence eight sectors: autos, banks, building materials and construction, cryptocurrency, energy, health care, retail and technology.

    Automobiles

    Monty Rakusen | Digitalvision | Getty Images

    The auto sector — like many others — will likely be a mixed bag, experts said.
    Trump’s antipathy for electric vehicles is likely to create headwinds for EV producers.
    His administration may try to roll back regulations such as a Biden-era tailpipe-emissions rule expected to push broader adoption of EVs and hybrids. He also intends to kill consumer EV tax credits worth up to $7,500 — although states such as California may try to enact their own EV rebates, blunting the impact.
    Losing the federal credit would make EVs more costly, driving down sales and perhaps making “per unit economics even less favorable” for automakers, John Murphy, a research analyst at Bank of America Securities, wrote in a Nov. 21 research note.
    Some companies seem well-positioned, though: Ford Motor, for example, “has a healthy pipeline of hybrid vehicles as well as traditional [internal combustion engine] vehicles to supplement the EV offerings,” Murphy wrote.

    Tariffs and trade conflict pose threats to the auto industry, since the U.S. relies heavily on other nations to manufacture cars and parts, said Callie Cox, chief market strategist at Ritholtz Wealth Management.
    They “could affect the cost and availability of cars we see in the U.S. market,” Cox said.
    Economists expect tariffs and other Trump policies to be inflationary.
    In that case, the Federal Reserve may have to keep interest rates higher for longer than anticipated. Higher borrowing costs may weigh on consumers’ desire or ability to buy cars, Cox said.
    However, lower EV production could be a boon for companies that manufacture traditional gasoline cars, experts said.
    Trump has also called for a “drill, baby, drill” approach to oil production. Greater supply could reduce gas prices, supporting demand for gas vehicles, experts said. But trade wars and sanctions on Iran and Venezuela could have the opposite impact, too.
    — Greg Iacurci

    Banks

    President Donald Trump stands next to JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, left, in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, Feb. 3, 2017.
    Andrew Harrer | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Trump’s first administration eased certain regulations for banking rules, fintech firms and financial startups.
    Likewise, Trump’s second term is expected to usher in lighter financial regulations.
    That may help bolster profitability in the sector, and therefore stock prices, said Brian Spinelli, co-chief investment officer at Halbert Hargrove in Long Beach, California, which is No. 54 on the 2024 CNBC FA 100 list.
    “The larger banks probably benefit more from that,” Spinelli said.
    Less regulation — combined with the prospect that interest rates could stay higher — will provide a net positive for the bank industry, since banks may be able to lend out more risk-based capital, said David Rea, president of Salem Investment Counselors in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, which is No. 8 on the 2024 CNBC FA 100 list.
    One issue that emerged this year that could resurface is concern about regional banks’ exposure to commercial real estate, Spinelli said.
    “It wasn’t that long ago, and I don’t think those problems disappeared,” Spinelli said. “So you question, is that still looming out there?”
    — Lorie Konish

    Building materials and construction

    Bill Varie | The Image Bank | Getty Images

    The housing market has been “frozen” in recent years by high mortgage rates, said Cox, of Ritholtz.
    Lower rates would likely be a “catalyst” for housing and associated companies, she said.
    However, that may not materialize — quickly, at least — under Trump, she said. If policies such as tariffs, tax cuts and mass deportations stoke inflation, the Federal Reserve may have to keep interest rates higher for longer than anticipated, which would likely prop up mortgage rates and weigh on housing and related sectors, she said.
    The whims of the housing market affect retailers, too: Home goods stores may not fare well if people aren’t buying, renovating and decorating new homes, Cox said.

    That said, deregulation could be “absolutely huge” for the sector if it accelerates building timelines and reduces costs for developers, Goldberg said.
    Trump has called for opening public land to builders and creating tax incentives for homebuyers, without providing much detail.
    Housing policy will be “one of the most-watched initiatives coming out of the next administration,” Cox said. “We haven’t gotten a lot of clarity on that front.”
    “If we see realistic and well-thought-out policies, you could see real estate stocks and related stocks” such as real estate investment trusts, home improvement retailers and home builders respond well, Cox said.
    — Greg Iacurci

    Crypto

    Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump gestures at the Bitcoin 2024 event in Nashville, Tennessee, U.S., July 27, 2024.
    Kevin Wurm | Reuters

    Trump’s election has brought a new bullishness to cryptocurrencies, with bitcoin nearing a new $100,000 benchmark before its recent runup ended.
    As president, Trump is expected to embrace crypto more than any of his predecessors.
    Notably, he has already launched a crypto platform, World Liberty Financial, that will encourage the use of digital coins.
    Those developments come as new ways of investing in crypto have emerged this year, with the January launch of spot bitcoin ETFs, and more recently, the addition of bitcoin ETF options.
    Yet financial advisors are hesitant, with only about 2.6% recommending crypto to their clients, an April survey from Cerulli Associates found. Roughly 12.1% said they would be willing to use it or discuss it based on the client’s preference. Still, 58.9% of advisors said they do not expect to ever use cryptocurrency with clients.
    “The No. 1 reason why advisors aren’t investing in cryptocurrency on behalf of their clients is they don’t believe it’s suitable for client portfolios,” said Matt Apkarian, associate director in Cerulli’s product development practice.

    Even for advisors who do expect they may use crypto at some point, it’s “wait and see,” particularly regarding how the regulatory environment plays out, Apkarian said.
    However, investors are showing interest in cryptocurrency, with 90% of advisors receiving questions on the subject, according to research from Christina Lynn, a certified financial planner and practice management consultant at Mariner Wealth Advisors.
    For those investors, exchange-traded funds are a good starting place, Lynn said, since there’s less chance of falling victim to one of crypto’s pitfalls such as scams or losing the keys, the unique alphanumeric codes attached to the investments. Because crypto can be more volatile, it’s best not to invest any money you expect you’ll need to pay for near-term goals, she said.
    Investors would also be wise to think of cryptocurrency like an alternative investment and limit the allocation to 1% to 5% of their overall portfolio, Lynn said.
    “You don’t need to have a lot of this to have it go a long way,” Lynn said.
    — Lorie Konish

    Energy

    President Donald Trump gestures after delivering a speech at a Double Eagle Energy Holdings LLC oil rig in Midland, Texas, July 29, 2020.
    Cooper Neill | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    As of Nov. 19, energy has been the top-performing sector under President Joe Biden, with a 22.9% gain, even with the administration’s push for renewables and sustainability, according to Raymond James.
    Yet it remains to be seen whether that performance can continue under Trump, who has advocated for more oil, gas and coal production. The outlook for the sector could change if Trump acts on a campaign threat to repeal the Inflation Reduction Act, a law enacted under Biden that includes clean energy incentives.
    If Trump continues to make it easier to create more oil supply, that might not be a great thing for oil companies, according to Adam, of Raymond James.
    “Because there’s more supply, it may tamp down on the price of oil, and that’s one of the biggest drivers of that sector,” Adam said.
    Eagle Global Advisors, a Houston-based investment management firm that specializes in energy infrastructure, is “cautiously optimistic” about Trump’s impact on the sector, according to portfolio manager Mike Cerasoli. Eagle Global Advisors is No. 35 on the 2024 CNBC FA 100 list.
    “We would say we’re probably more on the optimistic side than the cautious side,” Cerasoli said. “But if we know anything about Trump it’s that he’s a wild card.”

    A lot of the Inflation Reduction Act may stay intact, since the top states that benefited financially from the law also handed Trump a victory in the election, according to Cerasoli.
    When Biden won in 2020, there was a lot of panic about the outlook for energy, oil and gas. Cerasoli recalls writing in a third-quarter letter that year, “I don’t think it’s going to be as bad as you think.”
    Four years later, he has the same message for investors on the outlook for renewables. In the days following Trump’s inauguration, Cerasoli expects there may be a deluge of executive orders.
    “Once you get past that, you’ll get a sense of exactly how he’s going to treat energy,” Cerasoli said. “I think people will realize that it’s not the end of the world for renewables.”
    — Lorie Konish

    Health care

    Medicine vials on a production line.
    Comezora | Moment | Getty Images

    Trump nominated Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as head of the Department of Health and Human Services.
    RFK would be a “huge wild card” for the health-care sector if the U.S. Senate were to confirm him, said Goldberg, of Professional Advisory Services.
    RFK is a prominent vaccine skeptic, which may bode ill for big vaccine makers such as Merck, Pfizer and Moderna, said David Weinstein, a portfolio manager and senior vice president at Dana Investment Advisors, No. 4 on CNBC’s annual FA 100 ranking.
    Cuts to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, are also likely on the table to reduce government spending and raise money for a tax-cut package, experts said.
    Publicly traded health companies such as Centene, HCA Healthcare and UnitedHealth might be affected by lower volumes of Medicaid patients or consumers who face higher health-care premiums after losing ACA subsidies, for example, Weinstein said.

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. during the UFC 309 event at Madison Square Garden in New York City, Nov. 16, 2024.
    Chris Unger | Ufc | Getty Images

    Medical tech providers — especially those that supply electronics with semiconductors sourced from China — could be burdened by tariffs, he added.
    Conversely, deregulation might help certain pharmaceutical companies such as Thermo Fisher Scientific and Charles River Laboratories, which may benefit from faster approvals from the Food and Drug Administration, Goldberg said.
    Vivek Ramaswamy, a former biotech executive whom Trump appointed as co-head of a new advisory panel called the “Department of Government Efficiency,” has called for streamlined drug approvals. But Kennedy has advocated for more oversight.
    “There’s a real dichotomy here,” Weinstein said.
    “Where do we end up? Maybe where we are right now,” he added.
    — Greg Iacurci

    Retail

    Thomas Barwick | Digitalvision | Getty Images

    Tax cuts may boost consumers’ discretionary income, which would be a boon for companies selling consumer electronics, clothes, luxury goods and other items, Goldberg said.
    Then again, there’s a “high probability” of tariffs, Weinstein said.
    Retailers would likely pass on at least some of that additional cost to consumers, experts said.
    All physical goods, from apparel to footwear, tools and appliances are at risk from tariffs, Weinstein said. Tariff impact would depend on how the policies are structured.
    Home Depot, Lowe’s and Walmart, for example, source a relatively big chunk of their goods from abroad, Weinstein said.

    Home Depot CEO and President Ted Decker said Nov. 12 during the firm’s third-quarter earnings call that the company sources more than half its goods from the U.S. and North America, but “there certainly will be an impact.”
    “Whatever happens in tariffs will be an industrywide impact,” Decker said. “It won’t discriminate against different retailers and distributors who are importing goods.”
    It’s a good idea for investors to own “high quality” retailers without a lot of debt and with diversified inventory sources, Goldberg said. He cited TJX Companies, which owns stores including TJ Maxx, Marshalls and HomeGoods, as an example.
    “Direct imports are a small portion of [its] business and TJX sources from a variety of countries outside of China,” Lorraine Hutchinson, a Bank of America Securities research analyst, wrote in a Nov. 21 note.
    Deregulation may be positive for smaller retailers and franchises, which tend to be more sensitive to labor laws and environmental and compliance costs, Goldberg said.
    — Greg Iacurci

    Technology

    Former President Donald J. Trump speaks about filing class-action lawsuits targeting Facebook, Google and Twitter and their CEOs, escalating his long-running battle with the companies following their suspensions of his social media accounts, during a press conference at the Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey, July 07, 2021.
    Jabin Botsford | The Washington Post | Getty Images

    The technology sector continued its strong run in 2024, thanks in large part to the Magnificent Seven — Amazon, Apple, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla.
    Even broadly diversified investors may find it difficult to escape those names, as they are among the top weighted companies in the S&P 500 index.
    Information technology — which includes all those stocks except Amazon and Google parent Alphabet — comprises the largest sector in the S&P 500 index, with more than 31%.
    Trump is poised to have an influence on looming antitrust issues, amid considerations as to whether Google’s influence on online search should be limited.
    Any tariffs put in place may also prompt some sales to decline or the cost of raw materials to go up, said Rea of Salem Investment Counselors.
    Nevertheless, Rea said his firm continues to have a “pretty heavy” tech allocation, with strong expectations for generative artificial intelligence. However, the firm does not own Tesla, due to its expensive valuation, and has recently been selling software company Palantir, a winning stock that may have gotten ahead of itself, he said.
    Technology valuations are trading well into the high double digits on a price-to-earnings basis, which often signals forward returns will decline, according to Halbert Hargrove’s Spinelli.
    Consequently, prospective investors who come in now would basically be buying high, he said.
    “If you think you’re going to get the same double-digit returns in the next five years, sure, it could happen on a one-year basis,” Spinelli said. “But your chances historically have been that your returns come down.”
    — Lorie Konish More

  • in

    Constellation Brands’ stock falls as Trump tariff plan threatens to make Modelo and Corona more expensive

    Constellation Brands’ stock fell after President-elect Donald Trump announced plans to place a 25% tariff on Mexican imports.
    The brewer manufactures all of its beers, which represent 86% of its sales, in Mexico.
    The company will likely opt to raise prices to offset the cost of tariffs, if implemented.

    Packages of Modelo Especial beer are displayed for sale in a grocery store on June 14, 2023 in Los Angeles, California. 
    Mario Tama | Getty Images

    Shares of Constellation Brands fell 3.5% on Tuesday after President-elect Donald Trump announced plans to place a 25% tariff on Mexican imports once he’s inaugurated.
    Constellation imports all of its beer from Mexico, including Modelo and Corona. Beer accounted for 86% of Constellation’s sales in the first half of its fiscal year.

    Shares of Constellation have fallen more than 3% this year, including Tuesday’s move. The brewer has a market cap of about $42 billion.
    If implemented, Trump’s proposed tariff would raise Constellation Brands’ cost of goods sold by roughly 16%, according to a research note from Wells Fargo Securities analyst Chris Carey published on Tuesday.
    To offset the tariffs, Constellation would likely raise prices. The brewer has some pricing power, even with inflation-weary consumers. Last year, Modelo Especial overtook Bud Light as the bestselling beer in the U.S.
    It’s unlikely that Constellation would move its beer production out of Mexico. Thanks to an antitrust settlement between Anheuser-Busch InBev, Grupo Modelo and the Department of Justice in 2013, AB InBev had to sell Modelo’s U.S. business to Constellation. That agreement requires Constellation to produce those beer brands where AB InBev makes them, according to a research note from Roth MKM analyst Bill Kirk.
    In recent years, Constellation has spent billions of dollars to expand its Mexican production capacity.

    It’s unclear if Trump will actually enact his planned tariffs. In his previous term, he proposed a 5% tariff on Mexican imports, with plans to escalate the levies up to 25%, but those tariffs weren’t implemented.
    In 2020, Trump signed a new trade agreement with Mexico and Canada into law.
    In the Monday night post on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump also threatened to implement an additional 10% tariff on goods from China and a 25% levy on Canadian imports.
    Shares of automakers, including General Motors and Stellantis, were also trading lower on Tuesday on tariff fears.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Walmart pulls back on DEI efforts, removes some LGBTQ merchandise from website

    Walmart confirmed that it’s ending some of its diversity initiatives, removing some LGBTQ-related merchandise from its website and winding down a nonprofit that funded programs for minorities.
    The big-box retailer, the nation’s largest, joins a list of companies feeling the heat from conservative activists.
    Other companies, including Tractor Supply and Molson Coors, have also walked back some of their equity and inclusion policies in recent months.

    A Walmart Supercenter in Burbank, California, Nov. 21, 2024.
    Allen J. Schaben | Los Angeles Times | Getty Images

    Walmart on Monday confirmed that it’s ending some of its diversity initiatives, removing some LGBTQ-related merchandise from its website and winding down a nonprofit that funded programs for minorities.
    The nation’s largest employer, which has about 1.6 million U.S. workers, joined a growing list of companies that have stepped back from diversity, equity and inclusion efforts after feeling the heat from conservative activists.

    Some have also attributed changes to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision last year that struck down affirmative action programs at colleges.
    Those companies include Tractor Supply, which said in June it was eliminating DEI roles and stopping sponsorship of Pride festivals. Lowe’s, Ford and Molson Coors have also walked back some of their equity and inclusion policies in recent months.
    Others, such as Anheuser-Busch-owned Bud Light and Target, have faced sharp backlash and falling sales after marketing campaigns or merchandise focused on the LGBTQ community.
    In a statement, Walmart said it is “willing to change alongside our associates and customers who represent all of America.”
    “We’ve been on a journey and know we aren’t perfect, but every decision comes from a place of wanting to foster a sense of belonging, to open doors to opportunities for all our associates, customers and suppliers and to be a Walmart for everyone,” the statement said.

    Among the changes, Walmart will no longer allow third-party sellers to sell some LGBTQ-themed items on Walmart’s website, including items marketed to transgender youth such as chest binders, company spokeswoman Molly Blakeman said.
    She said it also recently decided to stop sharing data with the Human Rights Campaign, a nonprofit that tracks companies’ LGBTQ policies, or with other similar organizations.
    Additionally, the big-box retailer is winding down the Center for Racial Equity, a nonprofit that Walmart started in 2020 after George Floyd’s murder sparked protests across the country. At the time, Walmart and the company’s foundation pledged $100 million over five years to fight systemic racism and create the center.
    Over the past year, the company has phased out supplier diversity programs, which gave preferential financing to some groups, such as women and minorities, after the Supreme Court decision striking down affirmative action.
    It’s also moved away from using the term “diversity, equity and inclusion” or DEI in company documents, employee titles and employee resource groups. For example, its former chief diversity officer role is now called the chief belonging officer.
    Blakeman said Walmart will continue to award grants, disaster relief, and funding to events such as Pride parades, but with more guidelines on how funding can be used.
    Some recent changes came on the heels of pressure from conservative activist Robby Starbuck, who threatened a consumer boycott of Walmart. Starbuck, a vocal DEI opponent who had also put heat on Tractor Supply, touted Walmart’s changes in a post on X, describing them as “the biggest win yet for our movement to end wokeness in corporate America.”
    Walmart had conversations with Starbuck over the last week and already had some DEI-related changes underway, Blakeman said.
    Walmart’s DEI changes were first reported by Bloomberg News. More

  • in

    Senate report slams airlines for raking in billions in seat fees

    American, Delta, United, Frontier, and Spirit together brought in $12.4 billion from seating fees between 2018 and 2023, a Senate panel report found.
    Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations has called executives from those airlines to testify before the panel next week.
    The Biden administration has vowed greater scrutiny of what it considers “junk fees” from airlines, hotels and other companies.

    A Delta Air Lines cabin.
    Leslie Josephs/CNBC

    A Senate subcommittee on Tuesday slammed U.S. airlines large and small over fees to pick seats on flights.
    Between 2018 and 2023 American, Delta, United, Spirit and Frontier brought in $12.4 billion in seating fees, including for seats with extra legroom as well as those in “preferred” locations that are closer to the front of the plane, or window or aisle seats, said the report from the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.

    Last year, United’s revenue from seating fees totaled $1.3 billion, the first time since at least 2018 that category surpassed checked bag-fee revenue, the report said.
    While most major U.S. airlines have gotten rid of ticket change fees for standard economy tickets, they have added fees to select more popular or roomier seats on board. Carriers have also been racing to add more premium seats on board to increase revenue.

    Stamping out so-called junk fees has been a priority for the Biden administration. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., the subcommittee’s chair, said airline executives have been called to testify about the practice at a Dec. 4 hearing called “The Sky’s the Limit—New Revelations About Airline Fees.”
    Airlines for America, a trade group that represents the largest U.S. carriers, said air travel has become more affordable and that customers can choose what they want to pay for onboard.

    Read more CNBC airline news

    “The report demonstrates a clear failure by the subcommittee to understand the value the highly competitive U.S. airline industry brings to customers and employees. Rather, the report serves as just another holiday travel talking point,” the group said.

    The report also criticized budget airlines Spirit and Frontier, saying they paid gate agents $26 million between 2022 and 2023 to “catch passengers allegedly not following airline bag policies, often forcing those passengers to pay a bag fee or miss their flight.”
    Spirit said in a statement that it is “transparent about our products and pricing, our airport policies ensure Guests are treated fairly and equally, and we comply with all tax laws and regulations.”
    Frontier said that the commissions for gate agents are “simply designed to incentivize our team members to ensure compliance with bag size requirements so that all customers are treated equally and fairly, including the majority who comply with the rules.”

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More