More stories

  • in

    ‘World’s first downside protected bitcoin ETF’: Calamos unveils a safer way to play crypto

    A major exchange-traded fund provider is trying to take the volatility out of bitcoin investing.
    Calamos Investments launched the Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOJ) on Wednesday. The firm brands it as “the world’s first downside protected bitcoin ETF.” It is built with risk-adverse investors in mind.

    “You can get in all day long. Get that 100% protection. And then at the end of the day, we’re going to strike the cap,” the firm’s ETF head Matt Kaufman told CNBC’s “ETF Edge” this week.” Bitcoin is a volatile asset … we don’t want the price of bitcoin to move on you overnight.”
    The firm launched the new bitcoin ETF on Wednesday. It coincides with a winning month for bitcoin. The cryptocurrency is up 10% as of late Thursday afternoon.
    According to a Calamos press release, the fund provides access to bitcoin in a risk-controlled environment.
    “Many investors have been hesitant to invest in bitcoin due to its epic volatility,” Kaufman said in the release. “Calamos seeks to meet advisor, institutional and investor demands for solutions that capture bitcoin’s growth potential while mitigating the historically high volatility and drawdowns of this fast-growing and high performing asset.”
    Calamos has more crypto funds on deck. It is set to launch Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBXJ) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBTJ) on Feb. 4, according to the Calamos website.

    ‘You’re not going to see meme coin ETFs from Calamos’

    Despite the firm’s appetite to offer cryptocurrency funds, Kaufman told “ETF Edge” there is one group Calamos will not consider.
    “You’re not going to see meme coin ETFs from Calamos. But the ability to access bitcoin in a way that meets your risk tolerance, that’s what we’re about,” Kaufman said.

    Disclaimer More

  • in

    Wealthy leaders share financial advice they gave their kids: Invest early, learn from failure — and think carefully about inheritance

    Converge Home

    Talk about money and budgeting early is the advice of wealthy CEOs and founders.
    Allow your kids to invest in something low-risk at the start and ask them to explain their rationale, leaders told CNBC.
    Talk to children in their own terms, according to Singapore-based CEO Gregory Van. Ask: “Do you want to spend $100 today on a toy, or have it turn into $200 in 10 years when you are 16?” he said.

    Sally Anscombe | Getty Images

    Entrepreneur Eric Malka had to completely shift his mindset when he sold his company and became an investor. Since then he’s learned many lessons he’s now passing to his kids.
    When The Art of Shaving — which Malka and his wife Myriam Zaoui founded in 1996 — was bought by Procter & Gamble for a reported $60 million in 2009, Malka realized he needed to educate himself.  

    “When an entrepreneur like me is lucky enough to have a liquidity event, then we’re faced … with managing assets without proper training,” he told CNBC by video call. Investors must focus on being patient and on long-term returns, whereas company founders often look at a short-term plan, “almost an opposite” mindset, Malka said.
    He took courses on wealth management, read books on investing and now has a diversified portfolio of stocks, bonds, private equity and real estate, with about 10% allocated to riskier investments. In 2014 he founded private equity fund Strategic Brand Investments.

    The lessons learned when you lose are more valuable than the ones when you succeed.

    Eric Malka
    Co-founder and CEO, Strategic Brand Investments

    When it came to educating his children — sons aged 14 and 16 — about money, Malka’s attitude has been to help them learn from the ground up.
    “One of the challenges I faced with my teenagers early on, is their belief that it’s very easy to make money by investing through social media and through what they hear from friends,” he said. His older son thought he could generate a 20% monthly return, which Malka described as “very concerning.” So, Malka let him invest a small portion of his savings, hoping it would provide an opportunity to learn — and his son lost 40% of that investment after trading currency futures.
    “I hate to set up my child for failure, but sometimes, you know, the lessons learned when you lose are more valuable than the ones when you succeed,” Malka said.

    It’s a point that resonates with Gregory Van, CEO of Singapore-based wealth platform Endowus. He and his wife have children aged eight, six and three. He said he’ll be teaching them that it’s important to make mistakes when the stakes seem large to them, though may be small in reality. “The emotional muscle, and humility required to be a good investor is something that people need to develop on their own,” he said.

    Teaching kids how to invest

    For Dayssi Olarte de Kanavos, president and co-founder of real estate company Flag Luxury Group, educating kids early about money is key.
    She and her husband allocated a “low risk” sum of money to each of their three children in middle school for them to pick companies to invest in. “Our children chose Apple, Amazon, Google and Alibaba. All but one had terrific runs. As long as they kept their money in the market and continued to be thoughtful in their approach, we added every year to their nest egg,” she told CNBC by email. 
    Olarte de Kanavos said her experience in real estate investing taught her the value of patience. “It influenced my business approach by emphasizing long-term strategy over quick gains,” she said. The mother of three described her own investments in the stock market as “very conservative, in order to best manage the huge risks that we take in our real estate business.”

    Give them an allowance no later than the first grade.

    Dayssi Olarte de Kanavos
    President and co-founder, Flag Luxury Group

    She suggested having children explain why they want to buy certain stocks, because it “can demystify investing and make it an exciting and integral part of their education,” she said.
    Van said he talks to his young kids about the tradeoffs of investing in their own terms. “I ask them: ‘If we invest this $100 and it goes down by $70 next year, how will you feel?’ ‘Do you want to spend $100 today on a toy, or have it turn into $200 in 10 years when you are 16?’,” Van told CNBC via email. “Surprisingly, they are very rational and always go for delayed gratification,” he said.
    Van and his wife have investment portfolios for each of their kids, mostly made up of gifts they’ve received during holidays such as Chinese New Year. “Given their long investment horizon, they are in very diversified, multi-manager, low-cost equities portfolios,” Van said, and he shows his children their portfolios’ performance — positive or negative — whenever they ask.

    Budgeting and saving for children

    Age-appropriate advice is very important, Malka said. His focus right now is teaching his children about budgeting, providing them with a fixed allowance per month.
    “In the beginning, you know, they would spend in 10 days what they were supposed to spend in 30 days … now I’ve been doing this for eight months or nine months, now they’re really managing it properly, and I think that’s a skill they don’t realize they’re being taught,” he said. He recommended the book “Raising Financially Fit Kids,” by Joline Godfrey, which provides advice by age-group.
    “Give them an allowance no later than the first grade,” is Olarte de Kanavos’ suggestion. “The purpose of an allowance is to allow them to learn to make their own decisions about money and to manage the repercussions that come with their choices,” she told CNBC. “As they get older, teach them about saving, the concept of interest, and the difference between good and bad debt,” she said.
    For Roshni Mahtani Cheung, CEO and founder of media company The Parentinc, long-term thinking is important. She and her husband opened a fixed-deposit account for their eight-year old daughter for the money she receives at Chinese New Year, and at Diwali she receives a gold coin. “My goal is for her to grow up financially savvy, confident, and ready to make her own decisions,” Mahtani Cheung told CNBC by email.

    Talking to kids about their inheritance

    A concern for the wealthy members of advisory network Tiger 21 is how and when to talk to their children about their inheritance. “They are most concerned about their kids leading independent productive lives and don’t want knowledge about the wealth they will inherit to distract them or take them off course,” said Tiger 21’s founder and chairman Michael Sonnenfeldt in an email to CNBC.
    Around 70% of the network’s members want to wait until their kids are close to 30 years-old and have established careers to detail what they might inherit — and when, Sonnenfeldt said. “However, about 30% of members want to begin working with their kids in their late teens or early 20s to teach them to become responsible stewards for the wealth they will inherit,” he said. Both approaches are valid, he added.
    “I suggest that parents encourage open, values-driven conversations about money and investing,” Sonnenfeldt said. More

  • in

    Airlines flex pricing power, signaling higher fares in 2025

    Strong demand and limited capacity growth are set to push airfares higher.
    Aircraft delays have added to growth limitations.
    Some carriers have pulled back from the oversupplied domestic market.

    Travelers walk through O’Hare International Airport in Chicago on Dec. 20, 2024.
    Kamil Krzaczynski | AFP | Getty Images

    Higher airfare is in store this year as strong demand, even during the dead of winter, and limited capacity growth prompt airlines to flex their pricing power.
    Fare-tracking platform Hopper this month said domestic “good deal” U.S. airfare in January is at $304, up 12% over last year, with more domestic flights going for more than they did last year through at least June.

    Late deliveries of new aircraft from Boeing and Airbus, air traffic constraints and financial pressures have limited airlines’ ability to expand flights, which has pushed fares higher. Spirit Airlines, which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in November, was the most dramatic case and has slashed its flights to cut costs.
    American Airlines on Thursday forecast a jump in revenue of as much as 5% in the first quarter over the same three months of 2024, while capacity will be flat or even down as much as 2%.
    “We do expect airfare to come up,” American Airlines Chief Financial Officer Devon May said in an interview. The airline forecast a wider-than-expected-loss for the first quarter, however, disappointing investors as it expects an increase in costs, such as higher wages from new labor contracts signed last year.
    Startup carrier Breeze Airways on Thursday reported its first quarterly operating profit, for the fourth quarter, and founder David Neeleman, who is also the founder of JetBlue Airways, said conservative industry growth is boding well for future results.
    “The tide is lifting a lot of boats,” he said in an interview. “We’re exceeding our targets in revenue. Momentum we saw in the fourth quarter is continuing into the first.”

    Read more CNBC airline news

    Alaska Airlines late Wednesday said it expects revenue growth for the first quarter to rise by “high single digit” percentage points with capacity up no more than 3.5%.
    United Airlines, which had a first-quarter earnings forecast that far surpassed analysts’ expectations, shared a similar sentiment, particularly for domestic trips.

    “The domestic pricing environment is improving as underperforming airlines remove unprofitable capacity at an increasing rate and business traffic growth accelerates,” United’s Chief Commercial Officer Andrew Nocella said on the company’s earnings call on Wednesday. “Industry fare sales are less prevalent with lower discount rates as airlines are prioritizing profitability.”
    Delta Air Lines, which kicked off airline earnings season earlier this month, forecast revenue growth of 7% to 9% for the first quarter, with unit sales growing across its globe-spanning network.
    Off-season travel, particularly to Europe, has been a big bright spot for large U.S. carriers. Delta’s president, Glen Hauenstein, for example, said on the Jan. 10 earnings call that trans-Atlantic unit revenue should be up mid-single digits with demand “benefiting from strong U.S. point of sale and an extension of the season with unprecedented off-peak results.”
    Carriers are also seeing more customers buy up for roomier — and pricier — seats.
    JetBlue Airways and Southwest Airlines are scheduled to report fourth-quarter results and provide their 2025 outlooks next week. Both carriers are trying to ramp up revenue with more new premium seating and by debuting other amenities. More

  • in

    Boeing expects $4 billion loss for fourth quarter after chaotic 2024

     Boeing outlined expected results and charges across its business in preliminary fourth-quarter results.
    Boeing has not posted an annual profit since 2018.
    The company expects to take a $1.1 billion charge on its 777X and 767 programs because of the strike and labor agreement.

    An aerial view of the engines and fuselage of an unpainted Boeing 737 MAX airplane parked in storage at King County International Airport-Boeing Field in Seattle, Washington.
    Lindsey Wasson | Reuters

    Boeing said Thursday that it likely lost about $4 billion in the fourth quarter, adding to troubles at the manufacturer, which began 2024 with a midair accident and ended it with a crippling labor strike and layoffs.
    The company said it expects to post a loss of $5.46 per share for the fourth quarter. It said it expects its revenue to be $15.2 billion, less than analysts’ expectations, according to LSEG estimates. Boeing said it likely burned through $3.5 billion in cash during the quarter. The company raised more than $20 billion in the quarter to boost liquidity during its crises.

    Boeing has not posted an annual profit since 2018.
    The company expects to take a $1.1 billion charge on its 777X and 767 programs because of the strike and new contract.
    “Although we face near-term challenges, we took important steps to stabilize our business during the quarter including reaching an agreement with our IAM-represented teammates and conducting a successful capital raise to improve our balance sheet,” Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg said in a news release.
    Boeing has struggled to regain its footing after a door plug blew out midair in January 2024, sparking a new safety crisis at the company that was trying to put behind it the fallout from two fatal crashes in 2018 and 2019.
    The near-catastrophic accident brought new federal scrutiny and a slowdown of deliveries of new planes. A nearly two-month machinists strike that started in September shut down most of its commercial aircraft production. The workers, mostly in the Puget Sound area, won a new contract in November.

    The all-important commercial airplane unit revenue will likely come in at $4.8 billion, with a negative operating margin of nearly 44%.
    Boeing’s problems also extend to its defense unit, for which it expects to record pretax charges of $1.7 billion on the KC-46A tanker, and the long-delayed 747s that will service as the new Air Force One aircraft, as well as its space programs.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Shares of cash-strapped Nikola nosedive on report of potential sale

    Shares of Nikola closed Thursday down 27.8% after a report that the embattled electric truck maker is exploring options to sell parts or all of the business.
    Bloomberg News reported the potential sale Thursday afternoon and noted other possibilities under consideration include bringing on partners and raising new funds.
    Nikola warned investors on its third-quarter conference call that the company only had enough cash to support its business into the first quarter of 2025 but not beyond.

    U.S. Nikola’s logo is pictured at an event held to present CNH’s new full-electric and Hydrogen fuel-cell battery trucks in partnership with U.S. Nikola event in Turin, Italy, on Dec. 3, 2019.
    Massimo Pinca | Reuters

    DETROIT — Shares of Nikola closed Thursday down 27.8% after a report that the embattled electric truck maker is exploring options to sell parts or all of the business.
    The stock closed Thursday at 85 cents apiece after hitting a new 52-week low of 76 cents prior to the end of trading.

    Bloomberg News reported the potential sale Thursday afternoon and noted other possibilities under consideration include bringing on partners and raising new funds.
    The report comes three months after Nikola warned investors on its third-quarter conference call that the company only had enough cash to support its business into the first quarter of 2025 but not beyond. Nikola reported $198 million in cash to end the third quarter.

    Stock chart icon

    Nikola stock nosedives.

    Nikola CEO Steve Girsky, a major stakeholder in the company, on the earnings call said the company was “actively talking to lots of potential different partners who value what we do and value what we’ve built.”
    Girsky, a former bank analyst and General Motors executive, took Nikola public through his special purpose acquisition company, or SPAC, in June 2020. It was a catalyst for more EV companies to go public through SPACs.
    Much similar to Nikola, most, if not all, have failed to live up to their initial expectations. Many, including Nikola, were the center of federal investigations, scandals and executive upheavals.
    Nikola did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment on the Bloomberg report.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    UnitedHealthcare taps company veteran Tim Noel as new CEO following Brian Thompson killing

    UnitedHealthcare tapped Tim Noel, a company veteran, as its new CEO following the fatal, targeted shooting of its former top executive, Brian Thompson, in Manhattan in December. 
    Noel served as the head of Medicare and retirement at UnitedHealthcare, the largest private health insurer in the U.S. and the insurance arm of UnitedHealth Group.
    The company is still reeling from the murder of Thompson, which unleashed a torrent of pent-up anger and resentment toward the insurance industry and renewed calls for reform.

    UnitedHealthcare signage is displayed on an office building in Phoenix, Arizona, on July 19, 2023.
    Patrick T. Fallon | Afp | Getty Images

    UnitedHealthcare on Thursday tapped company veteran Tim Noel as its new CEO following the targeted killing of its former top executive, Brian Thompson, in Manhattan in December. 
    Noel was the head of Medicare and retirement at UnitedHealthcare, the largest private health insurer in the U.S. It is the insurance arm of UnitedHealth Group, the nation’s biggest health-care conglomerate based on revenue and its more than $480 billion market cap. 

    Noel, who first joined the company in 2007, “brings unparalleled experience to this role with a proven track record and strong commitment to improving how health care works for consumers, physicians, employers, governments and our other partners,” UnitedHealth Group said in a statement.
    The company is still reeling from the murder of Thompson, which unleashed a torrent of pent-up anger and resentment toward the insurance industry, renewed calls for reform and reignited a debate over health care in the U.S.
    Amid concerns about physical safety, companies across the industry have beefed up security for their executives and removed their photos and much of their personal information from their websites. That includes UnitedHealth Group, which appears to no longer have an executive leadership page.
    Luigi Mangione, who was charged in the deadly shooting of Thompson, is currently being held without bond in Brooklyn, New York. Mangione, 26, faces charges including murder and terrorism, to which he has pleaded not guilty.
    Noel oversaw a part of UnitedHealthcare’s business that includes Medicare Advantage plans, which have been the source of skyrocketing costs for insurers. 

    Medicare Advantage, a privately run health insurance plan contracted by Medicare, has long been a key source of growth and profits for the insurance industry. But medical costs from Medicare Advantage patients have jumped over the past year as more seniors return to hospitals to undergo procedures they had delayed during the Covid-19 pandemic. 
    UnitedHealthcare’s Medicare and retirement unit serves one-fifth of Medicare beneficiaries, or nearly 13.7 million patients, according to a fact sheet from the company. 
    UnitedHealth Group CEO Andrew Witty said on an earnings call last week that the profit-driven U.S. health-care system “needs to function better” and be “less confusing, less complex and less costly.”
    Witty said members of the system benefit from high prices, noting that lower prices and improved services can be good for customers and patients but can “threaten revenue streams for organizations that depend on charging more for care.” However, Witty did not address to what extent UnitedHealth Group benefits from that model. 
    In its first quarterly results since the killing, UnitedHealth Group reported fourth-quarter revenue that missed Wall Street’s expectations due to weakness in its insurance business.
    The company’s 2024 revenue rose 8% to $400.3 billion, and it expects revenue to climb again this year to a range of $450 billion to $455 billion.
    — CNBC’s Bertha Coombs contributed to this report.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Trump just took a shot at Bank of America. Here’s what he’s talking about

    President Donald Trump on Thursday accused the CEOs of Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase of refusing to serve conservatives.
    Both banks deny the accusations, which Trump and others in his orbit have repeated in recent months.
    The accusations may have roots in allegations from state attorneys general last year.

    U.S. president Donald Trump appears on a giant screen as he addresses global elites via video conference at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Jan. 23, 2025.
    Fabrice Coffrini | Afp | Getty Images

    President Donald Trump on Thursday accused the CEOs of the two largest American banks of refusing to serve conservatives, reviving a 2024 campaign talking point that the two companies deny.
    Speaking via video to an assembly held at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Trump lashed out at Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan and JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon as part of a Q-and-A session.

    “I hope you start opening your bank to conservatives because many conservatives complain that the banks are not allowing them to do business within the bank, and that included a place called Bank of America,” Trump said.
    “You and Jamie and everybody, I hope you’re going to open your banks to conservatives because what you’re doing is wrong,” Trump said.
    Moynihan, who was among a few executives selected to ask the president questions during the Q-and-A, did not immediately respond to the accusation.
    Both banks deny refusing service to conservatives.
    “We serve more than 70 million clients, we welcome conservatives and have no political litmus test,” a Bank of America official said in an email.

    “We have never and would never close an account for political reasons, full stop,” a JPMorgan spokeswoman said in a statement. “We follow the law and guidance from our regulators and have long said there are problems with the current framework Washington must address.”
    In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, caused in part by shoddy lending standards at major banks, U.S. regulators increased pressure on lenders to purge clients in industries considered higher risk for money laundering or fraud. That meant that payday lenders, pawn shops, firearms dealers and those involved in pornography had their accounts revoked, often with little notice or explanation as to why.
    As recently as October, Trump singled out Bank of America, repeating claims that it discriminates against conservatives.
    The accusations may have roots in allegations from state attorneys general last year. In April, Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach sent a letter to Moynihan, accusing the bank of canceling the accounts of “multiple religious groups with mainstream views in the last three years.”
    In a May letter in response to Kobach, Bank of America said accounts are de-banked for reasons including a change of stated purpose of the account, the expected level or type of activity on the account or failure to verify certain documentation required by law.
    One account highlighted by Kobach was de-banked because it engaged in debt collection services, which was inconsistent with the Bank of America division that was servicing the account, according to the bank’s response.
    “We would like to provide clarity around a very straightforward matter: Religious beliefs or political view-based beliefs are never a factor in any decisions related to our client’s accounts,” the bank said in that letter. “Bank of America provides banking services to non-profit organizations affiliated with faith-based communities throughout the United States. We have banking and investing relationships with approximately 120,000 faith-based clients in the United States.”
    Influential people in Trump’s orbit have continued to claim that banks are discriminating based on religion or politics.
    In November, Marc Andreessen, co-founder of the venture capital firm that bears his name, told podcaster Joe Rogan that dozens of startup founders had been de-banked in recent years. Andreessen has said he advises Trump on technology matters.
    Bank of America shares were up more than 1% on Thursday, with JPMorgan shares higher as well.
    The banking industry is seen as one of the biggest beneficiaries of the election of Trump, in large part because of expectations he would kill Biden-era regulatory efforts to force banks to hold tens of billions of dollars in additional capital against losses, make annual stress tests less opaque and drop efforts to cap credit card and overdraft limitations.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Return-to-office policies are ‘creeping up,’ researcher says. Many workers would rather quit

    About half of workers say they’d rather quit than return to the office full-time, according to a Pew Research Center poll.
    Big companies like Amazon, AT&T, Boeing, Dell Technologies, JPMorgan Chase, UPS and The Washington Post have initiated return-to-office mandates for at least some employees.
    Workers value hybrid work similarly to an 8% raise, by one estimate.

    Justin Paget | Digitalvision | Getty Images

    Many workers hate the prospect of returning to the office five days a week — so much so that they’d quit their jobs if told to come in full-time.
    To that point, 46% of workers who currently work from home at least sometimes would be somewhat or very unlikely to stay at their job if their employer scrapped remote work, according to a recent poll by Pew Research Center.

    Yet, employers have reined in remote work.
    About 75% of workers were required to be in the office a certain number of days per week or month as of October 2024, up from 63% in February 2023, Pew found.
    “There’s a certain creeping up” of return-to-office policies, said Kim Parker, director of social trends research at the Pew Research Center.

    Companies like Amazon, AT&T, Boeing, Dell Technologies, JPMorgan Chase, UPS and The Washington Post have called at least some employees back to the office five days a week. President Donald Trump signed an executive action on Monday calling federal employees back to their desks “as soon as practicable.”
    Similar to the Pew survey, a poll conducted by Bamboo HR found that 28% of workers would consider quitting due to a return-to-office mandate.

    The data “underscores how comfortable people have become with this arrangement, and how it really fits in with their lifestyle,” Parker said.
    Workers consistently cite a better work-life balance as a “huge benefit” of remote work, Parker said.
    Indeed, they see the financial value of hybrid work as being equivalent to an 8% raise, according to research by Nick Bloom, an economics professor at Stanford University who studies workplace management.

    Economists say remote work is here to stay

    Maskot | Maskot | Getty Images

    Many economists think that the higher prevalence of remote work, relative to the pre-pandemic era, has become an entrenched feature of the U.S. labor market.  
    “Remote work is not going away,” Bloom previously told CNBC.
    That’s largely because it boost profits for companies: Workers quit less often, meaning employers save money on recruiting and other functions tied to attrition, Bloom said. Meanwhile, data shows that productivity doesn’t suffer in hybrid work arrangements, he said.
    More from Personal Finance:How to know if a rental listing is a scamNow is an ‘ideal time’ to reassess your retirement savingsHow climate change is reshaping home insurance costs
    More than 60% of paid, full workdays were done remotely in early 2020, during the Covid-19 pandemic — up from less than 10% before the pandemic, according to WFH Research, a project run jointly by researchers from MIT, Stanford, the University of Chicago and Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México.
    That share has fallen by more than half. However, it has leveled out between 25% and 30% for about two years, according to WFH Research data.

    About 31% of employers reduced remote work opportunities in 2024, down from 43% in 2023, according to according to a ZipRecruiter survey. Yet, another 33% expanded remote work, up from 32% the prior year.
    Companies that imposed RTO mandates have annual rates of employee turnover that are 13% higher than those that have become “more supportive” of remote work, ZipRecruiter said.
    “The ability to work from anywhere remains a top priority for many professionals,” according to a 2024 poll by consulting firm Korn Ferry of 10,000 workers in the U.S., U.K., Brazil, Middle East, Australia and India.

    Companies may want workers to quit

    Some businesses force workers back to the office precisely because they want workers to quit, experts said. It’s a stealthy way of reducing headcount without having explicit layoffs, they said.
    “Requiring federal employees to come to the office five days a week would result in a wave of voluntary terminations that we welcome,” Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, who Trump tapped to lead a new Department of Government Efficiency, wrote in a November op-ed. (Ramaswamy has since bowed out of that role.)
    Of course, there are also tradeoffs to remote work for businesses and workers.
    About 59% of employers cite concerns that remote work harms company culture, according to ZipRecruiter.

    About half of workers — 53% — who work from home at least part-time say it “hurts” their ability to feel connected with co-workers, Pew found in a 2023 poll.
    “It’s the one big downside we’ve seen consistently,” Parker said.
    “That seems to be a tradeoff: You get the work-life balance but lose some connectivity with coworkers,” Parker said.
    Even if workers quit, they may not be able to find a job.
    The labor market remains strong, with low unemployment and low levels of layoffs, meaning workers have good job security, according to economists. However, companies have also pulled back on hiring, making it a challenging environment for job seekers. More