More stories

  • in

    BHP CEO expects a turnaround in China’s property sector in year ahead

    BHP’s CEO Mike Henry said he expects China’s property sector to rebound in the upcoming year on the back of favorable government policies.
    While acknowledging that the country’s property sector is a “weak point” for steel demand, Henry is optimistic about Chinese government measures announced recently.
    “The government has enacted policies recently that are meant to support the property sector… We expect that we could see a turnaround in the property sector in the year ahead,” Henry said.

    The company logo adorns the side of the BHP gobal headquarters in Melbourne on February 21, 2023. – The Australian multinational, a leading producer of metallurgical coal, iron ore, nickel, copper and potash, said net profit slumped 32 percent year-on-year to 6.46 billion US dollars in the six months to December 31. (Photo by William WEST / AFP) (Photo by WILLIAM WEST/AFP via Getty Images)
    William West | Afp | Getty Images

    BHP CEO Mike Henry said he expects China’s property sector to rebound in the upcoming year on the back of favorable government policies.
    While acknowledging that the country’s property sector is a “weak point” for steel demand, Henry is optimistic about the suite of measures the Chinese government has announced recently.

    “The government has enacted policies recently that are meant to support the property sector… We expect that we could see a turnaround in the property sector in the year ahead,” Henry said.
    In recent months, China has rolled out a slew of measures aimed at stabilizing the country’s property sector, which once purportedly accounted for about 25% to 30% of the country’s GDP. For example, Beijing scrapped the nationwide minimum mortgage interest rate and reduced the minimum down payment ratio for first-time buyers to 15%, compared to 20% previously.

    In May, the central bank also announced it would allocate 300 billion yuan ($42.25 billion) to financial institutions to lend to local state-owned enterprises for purchasing unsold apartments that have already been completed.
    On Saturday, China’s minister of housing Ni Hong said that there is still “great potential and room” for China’s property sector to expand as the country continues to urbanize and demand for good housing continues to grow.
    BHP reported a 2% climb in its annual underlying profits on Tuesday, attributing the growth to “solid operational performance and higher commodity prices in key commodities.”

    Henry noted, however, there is still “a bit of volatility” with respect to China’s steel demand, which has been under pressure from the property sector. 
    But the CEO said there are still other sectors in China that contribute to steel demand that are growing quite healthily, such as infrastructure, shipping and automobiles.
    Australian shares of BHP were 1.97% higher in Tuesday trading. More

  • in

    Mavericks, Pelicans games are leaving their local sports networks ahead of NBA season

    Sports Media

    The Dallas Mavericks and New Orleans Pelicans are exiting their local regional sports networks, ahead of the coming NBA season, which begins Oct. 22.
    Both teams terminated their deals with Diamond Sports, the largest owner of regional sports networks, which is currently under bankruptcy protection.
    The teams aired some of their games on local broadcast stations earlier this year, in deals that are becoming more common for NBA and NHL franchises exiting the regional sports network business.

    The NBA logo before the game between the Detroit Pistons and Charlotte Hornets at Little Caesars Arena in Detroit on March 11, 2024.
    Nic Antaya | Getty Images

    Dallas Mavericks and New Orleans Pelicans fans are waiting for a new way to watch local games in the upcoming National Basketball Association season.
    Both teams are exiting their regional sports networks owned by Diamond Sports, according to a Friday bankruptcy court filing.

    The NBA season is set to begin Oct. 22. While neither franchise has publicly announced where its local games will be aired, both teams have a history of televising their games with local broadcasters.
    The Pelicans have reached an agreement in principle with Gray Television to air games this season, a person close to the team told CNBC, confirming earlier media reports. Representatives for Gray and the Pelicans declined to comment on the matter.
    Last season, the Pelicans aired 10 of their matchups on Gray’s local stations, and the Mavericks, who appeared in last season’s NBA Finals, entered a 13-game agreement with Tegna’s Dallas-Fort Worth stations.
    Representatives for the Mavericks and Tegna did not immediately respond to CNBC’s requests asking who would broadcast their local games.
    The Mavericks and Pelicans are the latest teams to move the bulk of their regular-season games from their Diamond-owned regional sports networks, which are under the Bally Sports brand.

    Diamond Sports has spent the past 18 months trying to navigate its way out of bankruptcy, and along the way, several NBA, WNBA and National Hockey League teams have ditched regional sports networks in favor of local broadcasters. Some Major League Baseball teams that have left these networks will now have their games produced by the league.
    Diamond Sports will receive $1.3 million and more than $297,000 in repayments from the Mavericks and Pelicans, respectively, as part of the terminations, according to the court filing.
    The split with the Mavericks and Pelicans comes as Diamond enters into broadcast and streaming rights agreements with the NBA and NHL for the upcoming season as part of its bankruptcy process. The deals are subject to court approval.
    “We are appreciative of the ongoing collaboration and long-term partnerships with the NBA and NHL,” Diamond Sports CEO David Preschlack said in a statement, adding the deals with the leagues “are another major milestone” toward exiting bankruptcy protection.
    Diamond Sports has been one of many companies crushed by the decline of cable. Though it launched a sports-only streaming service for some of its teams in 2022, the company’s $8 billion debt load was too staggering to stop it from filing for bankruptcy protection.
    As the NBA and NHL seasons near, Diamond has also faced more pressure in recent months to form a viable business plan and prove it can make the necessary rights payments.
    Diamond marked another milestone this summer when it reached a deal to return its networks to Comcast’s cable TV customers. The Bally Sports networks went dark on Comcast — Diamond’s third largest distributor — in early May.
    Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal and CNBC.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    The IRS has a method of ‘last resort’ to collect overdue taxes: Revoking your passport

    By law, the IRS must notify the State Department if an individual’s federal tax debt is “seriously delinquent.”
    This is a large federal tax debt — of more than $62,000 in 2024 — that the taxpayer has repeatedly ignored.
    If taxpayers don’t remedy their overdue bill, the government will generally deny their passport application and can revoke or limit their active passport.

    Grace Cary | Moment | Getty Images

    Travelers, be warned: The federal government may revoke your passport if you ignore a big tax bill.
    Such punishments have become more frequent in recent years, experts said.

    Federal law requires the IRS and Treasury Department to notify the State Department if an American has a “seriously delinquent tax debt.”
    This is a large federal debt — of more than $62,000 in 2024 — that the taxpayer has repeatedly ignored.
    The debt threshold includes aggregate total federal tax liabilities, plus penalties and interest, levied against an individual. It’s adjusted annually for inflation.
    The State Department generally won’t issue a new passport and may revoke or limit an existing one in cases of serious delinquency, according to the IRS.

    The government typically uses this enforcement mechanism — which has been in place since 2018 — as a sort of last-ditch effort to collect unpaid tax levies, experts said.

    Should those debts remain unpaid, the potential consequences are ample: Travelers might not be able to take trips overseas until they’ve resolved their debt. Expats and those who travel abroad for business may have to return to U.S. soil indefinitely until their tax case concludes, for example, experts said.
    Revoking a passport is “a step of last resort,” said Troy Lewis, a certified public accountant based in Draper, Utah, and an accounting and tax professor at Brigham Young University.
    “How do you get rich folks’ attention regarding paying their taxes? Just make sure they can’t summer in Europe,” he said.

    ‘It gets people to call the IRS’

    Demand to travel abroad has surged as the Covid-19 pandemic has waned. Americans applied for about 21.6 million U.S. passports in fiscal 2023 — a record number, according to the State Department.
    Todd Whalen, a CPA based in Denver, has seen tax enforcement efforts involving passports ramp up over the past three years.
    “This is becoming more and more of a big deal,” said Whalen, founder of Advanced Tax Solutions, which helps consumers and businesses resolve tax debts. “We’ve gotten several [cases] this year.”
    More from Personal Finance:Here’s how the election could affect your taxesHow to use RMDs to improve your portfolio4 ways to use leftover money in a 529 plan
    In one instance, a client only found out his passport had been revoked while at the airport trying to fly to Mexico for a trip to celebrate his son’s high school graduation.
    “It works,” Whalen said of the collection effort. “It gets people to call [the IRS].”
    A State Department spokesperson declined to provide annual statistics on how many taxpayers had their passports revoked or denied. The IRS didn’t comment by press time.

    All other collections must have been ‘exhausted’

    J. David Ake | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    It can be “quite easy” for overdue tax debts to exceed the $62,000 threshold, according to Virginia La Torre Jeker, an attorney who specializes in U.S. international tax law.
    Americans living abroad, for example, may have “significant penalties” for not filing various foreign information returns, she said in an email.
    Debts can also include any tax levies owed by individuals, she added. Those may be business taxes for which the taxpayer is personally liable or trust fund recovery penalties, she said. (The latter relate to withheld income and employment taxes like Social Security taxes or railroad retirement taxes.)

    How do you get rich folks’ attention regarding paying their taxes? Just make sure they can’t summer in Europe.

    Troy Lewis
    accounting and tax professor at Brigham Young University

    However, revoking a passport isn’t generally the government’s first way to collect such overdue debts, experts said.
    The IRS must have already “exhausted” all other typical collection activities, said Lewis, owner of Lewis & Associates, CPAs.
    Generally, that would mean the taxpayer hasn’t responded to prior IRS notices of a federal tax lien, for example. (A lien is the government’s legal claim to a debtor’s assets like real estate and other personal property. It isn’t a move to collect said property, though.)
    Various courts have upheld the federal government’s ability to revoke passports in order to collect tax debts as constitutional, Lewis said.

    He pointed to two recent cases as examples: Franklin v. United States in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit and Maehr v. United States Department of State in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit.
    In the former, the defendant, James Franklin, owed about $422,000 in taxes for failing to file accurate tax returns and report a foreign trust of which he was the beneficial owner. The IRS ultimately filed a tax lien and levied his Social Security benefits, and the State Department later revoked his passport.
    “It seems pretty well established this is something [the government] can do,” Lewis said.

    Travelers have remedies available

    The State Department doesn’t revoke a passport straight away. When the IRS certifies debt as seriously delinquent and alerts the State Department of that, it will mail the taxpayer a notice — CP508C — outlining the potential implications of that classification.
    If an individual then applies for a passport, the State Department would generally deny and close that application if the person doesn’t make efforts to pay their debts. Such efforts might include paying the balance in full, entering into a payment plan or making a compromise agreement with the IRS.
    The debtor would still be able to use an active passport, if they have one, unless notified in writing by the State Department that their passport had been revoked or limited, the IRS said.

    “IRS looks at various factors, including taxpayer noncompliance in the past and taxpayer failure to cooperate with the IRS” when opting to revoke a passport, according to La Torre Jeker.
    The State Department can limit the passport’s use only to return travel to the U.S., thereby preventing the person “from being trapped in limbo” if outside the country, she said.
    The IRS sends taxpayers Letter 6152 before revocation, asking them to call the IRS within 30 days in order to resolve their account and avoid passport cancellation, she added.
    Still, sometimes passport denial catches debtors by surprise when they travel, said Whalen at Advanced Tax Solutions.
    For example, the IRS may have the wrong address on file — especially if a taxpayer has moved — and mail notices to the wrong place, Whalen said.
    “A lot of times, they don’t know they have a balance due until they … show up at the airport,” he said. More

  • in

    Boeing Starliner returning empty as NASA turns to SpaceX to bring astronauts back from ISS

    Boeing will return its Starliner capsule from the International Space Station without the NASA astronauts that it delivered to orbit.
    The agency instead is turning to SpaceX to bring back Butch Wilmore and Sunita “Suni” Williams.
    Wilmore and Williams will stay at the ISS for about six more months before flying home in February on SpaceX’s Dragon capsule as part of the Crew-9 mission.

    NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore, left, and Suni Williams pose inside the hatch connecting Boeing’s Starliner to the International Space Station on

    Boeing will return its Starliner capsule from the International Space Station without the NASA astronauts that it delivered to orbit in early June, the agency announced on Saturday.
    With Starliner coming back to Earth empty, NASA will now have astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams return via SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft, which is expected to launch its ninth regular mission to the ISS for the agency on Sept. 24.

    Ultimately, Wilmore and Williams will stay at the ISS for about six more months before flying home in February on SpaceX’s Crew-9 vehicle. The test flight was originally intended to last about nine days.
    The decision to bring Starliner back from the ISS empty marks a dramatic about-face for NASA and Boeing, as the organizations were previously adamant that the capsule was the primary choice for returning the crew.
    But Starliner’s crew flight test, which had been seen as the final major milestone in the spacecraft’s development, faced problems — most notably with its propulsion system.
    “Boeing has worked very hard with NASA to get the necessary data to make this decision,” NASA Administrator Bill Nelson said during a press conference with top NASA officials at Johnson Space Center in Houston on Saturday. “We want to further understand the root causes and understand the design improvements so that the Boeing Starliner will serve as an important part of our assured crew access to the ISS.”
    He reiterated that test flights are “neither safe, nor routine,” and that the decision was the “result of a commitment to safety.”

    NASA will now conduct another phase of its Flight Readiness Review to determine when to bring the empty Starliner home.

    Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft is pictured docked to the International Space Station orbiting above Egypt’s Mediterranean coast on June 13, 2024.

    Boeing officials had been adamant in press briefings that Starliner was safe for the astronauts to fly home in the event of an emergency, despite delaying the return multiple times. NASA said there was a “technical disagreement” between the agency and the aerospace company, and said it evaluated risk differently than Boeing for returning its crew.
    Nonetheless, NASA officials repeatedly expressed support for Boeing, and Nelson said he was “100% certain” that Starliner would be able to launch with a crew again someday.
    “We continue to focus, first and foremost, on the safety of the crew and spacecraft,” Boeing said in a statement posted on X on Saturday. “We are executing the mission as determined by NASA, and we are preparing the spacecraft for a safe and successful uncrewed return.”

    Read more CNBC space news

    Ken Bowersox, NASA associate administrator, said NASA officials were unanimous in their decision to choose SpaceX to bring the crew home.
    Meanwhile, SpaceX will bring two astronauts along on its Crew-9 vehicle — instead of four who were originally planned to go — to make room for Wilmore and Williams.”SpaceX stands ready to support @NASA however we can,” President and COO Gwynne Shotwell responded in a social media post on X.
    Boeing’s Starliner capsule “Calypso” has been at the International Space Station since early June on a mission that NASA extended indefinitely as the agency and company tried to identify why multiple of the spacecraft’s thrusters failed during docking.
    Those thrusters, part of the spacecraft’s propulsion system, are key to Starliner’s safe return from the ISS. NASA cited the thrusters on Saturday as an ongoing problem.
    The Starliner crew flight test was supposed to be a final box checked for Boeing and a key asset gained for NASA. The agency was hoping to fulfill its dream of having two competing companies — Boeing and Elon Musk’s SpaceX — flying alternating missions to the ISS.
    Instead, the flight test is further setting back Boeing’s progress in NASA’s Commercial Crew program and, with over $1.5 billion in losses absorbed already, threatens the company’s future involvement with it. More

  • in

    Why dividend stocks should be a hot play into fall

    It appears more investors are eyeing dividend stocks ahead of the Federal Reserve’s interest rate decision in September.
    Paul Baiocchi of SS&C ALPS Advisors thinks it is a sound strategy because he sees the Fed easing rates.

    “Investors are moving back toward dividends out of money markets, out of fixed income, but also importantly toward leveraged companies that might be rewarded by a declining interest rate environment,” the chief ETF strategist told CNBC’s “ETF Edge” this week.
    ALPS is the issuer of several dividend exchange-traded funds including the ALPS O’Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and its counterpart, the ALPS O’Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM).
    Relative to the S&P 500, both dividend ETFs are overweight health care, financials and industrials, according to Baiocchi. The ETFs exclude energy, real estate and materials. He refers to the groups as three of the most unstable sectors in the market.
    “Not only do you have price volatility, but you have fundamental volatility in those sectors,” Baiocchi said.
    He explains this volatility would undermine the goal of the OUSA and OUSM, which is to provide drawdown avoidance.

    “You’re looking for dividends as part of the methodology, but you’re looking at dividends that are durable, dividends that have been growing, that are well supported by fundamentals,” Baiocchi said.
    Mike Akins, ETF Action’s founding partner, views OUSA and OUSM as defensive strategies because the stocks generally have clean balance sheets.
    He also notes  the dividend category in ETFs has been surging in popularity.
    “I don’t have the crystal ball that explains why dividends are so in vogue,” Akins said. “I think people look at it as if you’re paying a dividend, and you have for years, there is a sense to viability to that company’s balance sheet.”

    Disclaimer More

  • in

    Restaurants fight back against the FTC crackdown on ‘junk fees’ as diners balk at new charges

    A proposed rule from the Federal Trade Commission aims to crack down on “junk fees,” but restaurants are hoping their fees and surcharges will still be allowed.
    In 2023, 15% of restaurant owners added surcharges or fees to checks because of higher costs, according to the National Restaurant Association.
    Restaurant operators say the fees keep their menu prices lower, improve employee compensation and are better for customers.

    Leopatrizi | E+ | Getty Images

    Lawmakers want to crack down on “junk fees,” but restaurants are trying to stay out of the fight.
    Surcharges or fees covering everything from credit card processing to gratuities to “inflation” have become more popular on restaurant checks in recent years.

    Last year, 15% of restaurant owners added surcharges or fees to checks because of higher costs, according to the National Restaurant Association. In the second quarter, 3.7% of restaurant transactions processed by Square included a service fee, more than double the beginning of 2022, according to a recent report from the company.
    Opponents of the practice say those fees and surcharges may surprise customers, hoodwinking them into paying more for their meals at a time when their wallets are already feeling thin. Fed-up diners compiled spreadsheets via Reddit of restaurants in Los Angeles, Chicago and D.C. charging hidden fees. Even the Onion took a swing at the practice, publishing a satirical story in May with the headline “Restaurant Check Includes 3% Surcharge To Provide Owner’s Sugar Baby With Birkin.”
    The Biden administration has broadly targeted so-called junk fees, like an undisclosed service charge for concert tickets or unexpected resort fees when checking out of a hotel. This fall, the Federal Trade Commission is expected to publish a rule banning businesses from “charging hidden and misleading fees.”

    U.S. President Joe Biden delivers remarks about retirement security in the State Dining Room at the White House on October 31, 2023 in Washington, DC. The Biden Administration is attempting to crack down on so-called “junk fees” in retirement accounts with a rule prosed by the U.S. Labor Department.
    Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images

    Restaurants are trying to stay out of the Biden administration’s crosshairs. They say surcharges and fees are necessary to keep their businesses afloat and to compensate their employees fairly in a competitive industry with razor-thin profit margins.
    “The challenge for the restaurants is that not all fees are junk fees … People know what they’re paying for when it comes to most fees that are on a restaurant bill,” said Sean Kennedy, executive vice president of public affairs for the National Restaurant Association.

    Fighting fees

    Some customers might disagree with Kennedy.
    While federal law makes it illegal for management to keep their workers’ tips, mandatory service charges are the property of the restaurant. Some states, like New York, have their own laws that say service charges belong to staff.
    A Denver-based restaurant worker said in a public comment responding to the FTC’s proposed rule that his employer describes the fee to customers as “equitably distributed to the staff.” But he was told when he was hired that the business keeps 30% of the proceeds.
    Service fees increase the risk of wage theft, because employers might claim that the money goes to workers but fail to distribute it, the National Women’s Law Center wrote in its public comment. Moreover, customers who pay a service charge are less likely to tip on top of the check, hurting workers’ income, the non-profit organization said.

    The restaurant perspective

    For their part, restaurant operators argue that service fees and other surcharges help them pay their employees more and provide better benefits.
    When Galit, a Middle Eastern restaurant in Chicago, opened its doors in 2019, it tacked on an optional 2% fee to cover health-care costs for its workers. These days, the fee is 4%, plus the restaurant adds a 20% service charge to each bill for hourly workers. The fees are stated clearly on its website, its Resy page and its menu.
     Co-owner and general manager Andres Clavero, who has an accounting background, said the restaurant chose that approach for a few different reasons.
    “We can dictate where it all goes, so some of our service charge of 20% goes to the back of house,” Clavero said.
    Moreover, higher menu prices could scare away customers, plus diners would have to pay higher sales tax. Galit would also have higher payroll taxes. And the service charge aims to address issues with tipping. The practice has grown more controversial in recent years, thanks to studies that connect it to sexual harassment and racial discrimination.
    If the fees were instead baked into the restaurant’s prices, customers might choose cheaper options that don’t provide the same benefits for its employees, Clavero said.
    In some cases, fees help restaurants navigate tricky legislation. For example, service charges became much more common in D.C. after voters approved Initiative 82, which will phase out the tipped wage by 2027. In March, the city passed a bill protecting service fees of 20% or less.
    Kaliwa, a Southeast Asian restaurant in D.C., said it implemented an 8% surcharge to manage rising labor and operating costs.
    “Our priority is to remain transparent with our guests, ensuring they understand the reasons behind these fees,” Kaliwa director Peter Demetri said.
    For Ming-Tai Huh, the head of Square’s restaurant business and a partner of Cambridge Street Hospitality Group, service fees have helped some of his Boston restaurants pay cooks and dishwashers more.
    Massachusetts law forbids sharing servers’ tips with kitchen workers. Thanks to the higher pay from the surcharges, more of the restaurant company’s workers have opted into its health-care program.
    Huh said that the service charge was easier to implement at the company’s fine-dining restaurants. But CSHG ended up taking it away from a fast-casual eatery because of customer pushback. Instead, the company just raised menu prices.

    Lobbyists vs. legislators

    On the state level, restaurants have already had some success in getting excluded from the fight over junk fees.
    In California, last-minute legislation excluded bars and restaurants – as well as grocery stores and grocery delivery services – from having to list the mandatory fees that they charge customers. As a result, the industry was exempt from a broad anti-junk-fee law that went into effect on July 1.
    “We believe that allowing the many restaurants who for decades have used auto gratuity instead of tips, (which is more fair and equitable), and more recently who have added service charges to help offset things like the SF Health Care Security Ordinance, will make it possible for restaurants to continue to support pay equity and contribute to worker health care,” the Golden Gate Restaurant Association wrote in a statement following the legislation’s passage.

    Close-up of a receipt showing a Convenience Fee in addition to charges for food items, Oakland, California, June 12, 2024. California’s SB 478 law would ban so-called “junk fees”.
    Smith Collection | Gado | Archive Photos | Getty Images

    The National Restaurant Association argues that getting rid of fees will lead to customer confusion, higher prices, less transparency and costly compliance. The trade group estimates that the cost for new menus alone would reach more than $4,800 per restaurant.

    Exceptions to the rule

    Even restaurant operators admit that not all fees and surcharges are worth protecting.
    Clavero opposes restaurants that use Covid surcharges more than four years after the pandemic temporarily shuttered dining rooms.
    “To have that, to me, is a cry for help. That’s not being fully open and honest about where your money is going,” he said.
    For its part, the National Restaurant Association said it’s pushing the FTC to protect three fees commonly charged by restaurants: large party, delivery and credit card processing.
    Kennedy said the trade group is trying to help operators preserve their razor-thin margins of 3% to 5%, which is difficult as the costs of doing business keep rising. For example, credit card swipe fees have doubled over the last decade, and are now the third-highest cost for restaurants, according to Kennedy.
    “What we have really been instilling in or membership is to be as open and transparent and public about it as possible, so customers know exactly what they’re getting into when they sit down to dine at their favorite restaurant,” Kennedy said. More

  • in

    Bronfman’s Paramount bid could keep Shari Redstone involved at the company

    Edgar Bronfman Jr. is open to having Shari Redstone stay involved at Paramount if the special committee accepts his consortium’s bid for a controlling stake.
    Skydance’s David Ellison has also held conversations with Redstone about her future with the company.
    One of the individuals who is part of Bronfman’s bid is former AOL CEO Jon Miller. Miller and Redstone run Advancit Capital, a small venture capital firm that invests in media and technology.

    Edgar Bronfman, Jr.
    Cameron Costa | CNBC

    Edgar Bronfman Jr.’s offer for a controlling stake in Paramount Global could keep Shari Redstone close to the company, if his bid is successful.
    Bronfman is open to having Redstone, currently non-executive chairman at Paramount, remain involved with the company if the Paramount special committee accepts his consortium’s bid for National Amusements, the controlling shareholder, according to a person familiar with the matter.

    Bronfman has raised $6 billion to challenge Skydance Media for ownership of National Amusements, the holding company founded by Sumner Redstone, according to people familiar with the matter. Both Bronfman’s bid and Skydance’s bid would also include money to buy out a percentage of Paramount Global common shareholders.
    At $6 billion, Bronfman’s bid would give cash to about 20% of Class B holders at $16 per share. Skydance would pay out about 50% of current Paramount common investors at $15 per share as part of its bid, according to the people familiar.
    It’s not clear if Redstone prefers one offer over the other. The Paramount Global special committee will determine if Bronfman’s offer is a superior proposal for shareholders by Aug. 28. If the committee decides Bronfman’s offer is better, Skydance will then have four business days to match. The deadline for the entire process to be concluded is Sept. 5.
    Bronfman still has a few more days to raise more money for a competing bid to counter Skydance, which agreed to an $8 billion deal to merge with Paramount Global last month. The special committee earlier this week extended the so-called “go-shop” period — during which it could entertain competing offers — by 15 days to review Bronfman’s initial bid.
    One of the individuals who is part of Bronfman’s bid is former AOL CEO Jon Miller, suggesting Redstone could potentially have more control over a future Paramount Global than she’d get with Skydance. Miller, a close ally of Redstone, has been connecting Bronfman with potential capital and would likely take a role with the company if it came under Bronfman’s stewardship — perhaps a board seat and an operational job — according to people familiar with the matter. Bronfman would be CEO of the company if his deal were to be accepted and go through, said the people.

    Miller, Redstone and Redstone’s son-in-law, Jason Ostheimer, together run Advancit Capital, a small venture capital firm that invests in media and technology. The trio are the only three people that appear on the firm’s website. Miller has also operated as a de facto strategic advisor to Redstone for many years, according to people familiar with the matter.
    Redstone has not spoken with Miller about the bid, according to people familiar with the matter.
    While the Redstone family and Bronfman family have run in similar circles, including donating heavily to Jewish foundations, Edgar Bronfman Jr. and Shari Redstone haven’t met many times and don’t have a close preexisting relationship, two of the people said.
    Skydance CEO David Ellison and Redstone have had several discussions about the potential for Redstone to stay in as a shareholder of a combined Skydance-Paramount Global, according to people familiar with the matter.
    Redstone is taking a wait-and-see approach to any future involvement she may want to have in Paramount Global moving forward regardless of its ownership, according to a person familiar with her thinking.
    Spokespeople for Redstone, Bronfman, the Paramount Global special committee and Skydance all declined to comment.

    11th hour bid

    Bronfman has spent the last few weeks aggregating individuals with interest in owning a piece of Paramount Global, including film producer Steven Paul and Patron cofounder John Paul DeJoria, who had previously considered a bid of their own, according to a person familiar with the process, as well as Fortress Investment Group, the credit arm of private equity firm BC Partners, and former Turner Broadcasting CEO John Martin.
    Bronfman’s financing comes from many different sources, which may potentially trigger regulatory concerns if too much of the money is from foreign entities. Having so many different financers may also make Bronfman’s offer riskier than Skydance’s bid, which is backed by private equity firm RedBird Capital and multibillionaire Larry Ellison, the father of David Ellison.
    Bronfman is the chairman of Fubo, a sports streaming service, and the former head of Universal and Warner Music.
    Skydance’s lawyers sent a letter to the Paramount Global special committee demanding the company stop negotiating with Bronfman, the Wall Street Journal reported Thursday. Skydance said Paramount Global breached the terms of the go-shop agreement by not alerting Skydance that it planned to extend the window, the report said.
    Skydance also argued the special committee didn’t have the right to extend the go-shop because a bid had to “reasonably be expected to lead to a superior proposal.” Skydance argued the Bronfman bid didn’t meet the criteria.
    WATCH: Media power struggle: Paramount deal in jeopardy? More

  • in

    How investors can prepare for lower interest rates: It’s ‘like getting a haircut,’ advisor says

    Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell signaled on Friday that lower interest rates are ahead.
    It would be the first time the central bank cut rates since the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic.
    Investors likely shouldn’t do much to prepare for that shift, advisors said.
    They can expect lower-risk assets like cash and short-term bonds to pay less of a return.

    Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell.
    Andrew Harnik | Getty Images

    Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell on Friday gave the clearest indication yet that the central bank is likely to start cutting interest rates, which are currently at their highest level in two decades.
    If a rate cut comes in September, as experts expect, it would be the first time officials have trimmed rates in over four years, when they slashed them to near zero at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic.  

    Investors may be wondering what to do at the precipice of this policy shift.
    Those who are already well diversified likely don’t need to do much right now, according to financial advisors on CNBC’s Advisor Council.
    “For most people, this is welcome news, but it doesn’t mean we make big changes,” said Winnie Sun, co-founder and managing director of Sun Group Wealth Partners, based in Irvine, California.
    “It’s kind of like getting a haircut: We’re doing small trims here and there,” she said.

    Many long-term investors may not need to do anything at all — like those holding most or all of their assets in a target-date fund via their 401(k) plan, for example, advisors said.

    Such funds are overseen by professional asset managers equipped to make the necessary tweaks for you.
    “They’re doing it behind the scenes on your behalf,” said Lee Baker, a certified financial planner and founder of Claris Financial Advisors, based in Atlanta.
    More from Personal Finance:Why remote work has staying powerThis RMD strategy can help avoid IRS penaltiesSome colleges is now cost nearly $100,000 a year
    That said, there are some adjustments that more-hands-on investors can consider.
    Largely, those tweaks would apply to cash and fixed income holdings, and perhaps to the types of stocks in one’s portfolio, advisors said.

    Lower rates are ‘positive’ for stocks

    In his keynote address on Friday at the Fed’s annual retreat in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, Powell said that “the time has come” for interest-rate policy to adjust.
    That proclamation comes as inflation has fallen significantly from its pandemic-era peak in mid-2022. And the labor market, though still relatively healthy, has hinted at signs of weakness. Lowering rates would take some pressure off the U.S. economy.

    The Fed will likely be choosing between a 0.25 and 0.50 percentage-point cut at its next policy meeting in September, Stephen Brown, deputy chief North America economist at Capital Economics wrote in a note Friday.
    Lower interest rates are “generally positive for stocks,” said Marguerita Cheng, a CFP and chief executive of Blue Ocean Global Wealth, based in Gaithersburg, Maryland. Businesses may feel more comfortable expanding if borrowing costs are lower, for example, she said.

    But uncertainty around the number of future rate cuts, as well as their size and pace, mean investors shouldn’t make wholesale changes to their portfolios as a knee-jerk reaction to Powell’s proclamation, advisors said.
    “Things can change,” Sun said.
    Importantly, Powell didn’t commit to lowering rates, saying the trajectory depends on “incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks.”

    Considerations for cash, bonds and stocks

    Falling interest rates generally means investors can expect lower returns on their “safer” money, advisors said.
    This would include holdings with relatively low risk, like cash held in savings accounts, money market funds or certificates of deposit, and money in shorter-term bonds.
    High interest rates have meant investors enjoyed fairly lofty returns on these lower-risk holdings.

    It’s kind of like getting a haircut: We’re doing small trims here and there.

    Winnie Sun
    co-founder and managing director of Sun Group Wealth Partners

    However, such returns are expected to fall alongside declining interest rates, advisors said. They generally recommend locking in high guaranteed rates on cash now while they’re still available.
    “It’s probably a good time for people who are thinking about buying CDs at the bank to lock in the higher rates for the next 12 months,” said Ted Jenkin, a CFP and the CEO and founder of oXYGen Financial, based in Atlanta.
    “A year from now you probably won’t be able to renew at those same rates,” he said.
    Others may wish to park excess cash — sums that investors don’t need for short-term spending — in higher-paying fixed-income investments like longer-duration bonds, said Carolyn McClanahan, a CFP and founder of Life Planning Partners in Jacksonville, Florida.

    “We’re really being aggressive about making sure clients understand the interest-rate risk they’re taking by staying in cash,” she said. “Too many people aren’t thinking about it.”
    “They’ll be crying in six months when interest rates are a lot lower,” she said.
    Bond duration is a measure of a bond’s sensitivity to interest rate changes. Duration is expressed in years, and factors in the coupon, time to maturity and yield paid through the term.
    Short-duration bonds — with a term of perhaps a few years or less — generally pay lower returns but carry less risk.
    Investors may need to raise their duration (and risk) to keep yield in the same ballpark as it has been for the past two or so years, advisors said. Duration of five to 10 years is probably OK for many investors right now, Sun said.

    Advisors generally don’t recommend tweaking stock-bond allocations, however.
    But investors may wish to allocate more future contributions to different types of stocks, Sun said.
    For example, stocks of utility and home-improvement companies tend to perform better when interest rates fall, she said.
    Asset categories like real estate investment trusts, preferred stock and small-cap stocks also tend to do well in such an environment, Jenkin said. More