More stories

  • in

    Here’s what current and former Fed officials are saying about Lisa Cook investigation

    Current and former Federal Reserve officials have offered their thoughts about the Trump administration’s recent mortgage fraud allegations toward Fed Governor Lisa Cook.
    Former Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren told CNBC on Friday that “until there’s some facts out, I don’t think people should draw any conclusion,” while others such as Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack called Cook an “outstanding economist and a person of high integrity.”
    President Donald Trump has said that he will fire Cook if she does not step down as Fed governor.

    Lisa Cook, governor of the US Federal Reserve, during the Federal Reserve Board open meeting in Washington, DC, US, on Wednesday, June 25, 2025.
    Al Drago | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Current and former Federal Reserve officials struck a common note when asked about Lisa Cook’s situation: It’s imperative the central bank’s independence is preserved.
    Cook, a Fed governor nominated in 2022 by then-President Joe Biden, has faced attacks over accusations of mortgage fraud from Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte. Justice Department attorney Ed Martin also urged Chair Jerome Powell to fire Cook from her post and confirmed a criminal investigation will take place.

    The central bank official rejected the idea of resignation Wednesday, saying in a statement she has “no intention of being bullied to step down from my position because of some questions raised in a tweet.”
    Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack told CNBC on Friday that she stood by Cook, noting: “I know Lisa Cook to be an outstanding economist and a person of high integrity, and I think it’s critically important that the Fed maintains its independence on monetary policy so we can ensure great outcomes for the American public.”

    The latest developments have fanned concerns on Wall Street surrounding the Fed’s independence. Trump has notably been a vocal critic of Powell, nicknaming him “too late” with regards to the timing of modifying interest rates and accusing him of being “political.”
    Although Trump has said that it’s “highly unlikely” he would fire Powell before his term as chair is up in May 2026, the president has already started considering several candidates to succeed him and just last week threatened to allow a “major lawsuit” against Powell to proceed while pushing for lower rates yet again.
    The Fed, which has maintained a strictly data-dependent stance, has kept rates steady since December.

    Trump also pressed Cook to resign this week in the wake of the accusations. He even said Friday that he will fire her if she does not leave her post. The odds that Cook will be out as governor this year spiked on prediction market Kalshi following those comments, rising to more than 30% from roughly 21% earlier in the day.

    U.S. President Donald Trump speaks by a wall featuring the names of former U.S. presidents and first ladies, as he visits The People’s House: A White House Experience museum, in Washington D.C., U.S., August 22, 2025.
    Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

    Former Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren thinks more information is needed before a decision — by Cook or the administration — is made.
    “I don’t know what Lisa Cook is going to choose to do. It is a difficult situation for her, but today we have allegations but no facts,” Rosengren said Friday on CNBC’s “Money Movers.” “Until there’s some facts out, I don’t think people should draw any conclusion.”

    Safeguarding independence

    When asked about the pressure that the Fed is facing, including the resignation calls against Cook, former Fed Vice Chair Roger Ferguson emphasized the importance of the institution educating the American public on “what it does and why it’s important” as well as “why we’ve gone through a period of inflation.”
    “People for the first time literally in 30 or 40 years had to deal with that, so everyone now understands, ‘Wow, this inflation thing is a secret tax on the middle-income and … lower-class individuals,” he said on CNBC’s “Squawk Box” on Friday. “The Fed is the institution whose mandate is to control inflation, as well as the other side, and so I turn this around and say it’s really time for all of us to educate the American people. That’s the way we ensure independence.”

    Ferguson added that it hasn’t turned out well in places around the world where central bank independence has been undermined. For the U.S., he’s still optimistic about the Fed’s future in that regard.
    “I think it maintains independence because the population will get behind and say, ‘Wait a minute, we had inflation, it’s not a good thing, we need an independent Fed to maintain that. Congress, etc., do your job, protect the Fed as best you can,'” he remarked. More

  • in

    Canada drops many of its retaliatory tariffs on the U.S.

    Canada announced Friday it was dropping most of its counter-tariffs of 25% on U.S. goods.
    The tariffs on U.S. autos, steel and aluminum will remain in place for now.
    The move comes as the U.S.-Mexico-Canada agreement is scheduled for a review in the next few months.

    Canada removed many of its retaliatory tariffs on the U.S. on Friday, marking a significant step forward in the two countries’ relationship.
    Canada in March imposed counter-tariffs of 25% on a long list of U.S. products that fall in line with the North American trade deal after the U.S. had announced 25% duties on steel and aluminum. Notably, Canada’s 25% tariffs on U.S. autos, steel and aluminum will remain in place for now, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said in a press conference Friday.

    The change will go into effect on Sept. 1, Carney added, saying he believes Canada has the best trade deal out of all of the countries working with the U.S.
    “As we work intensively with the United States, our focus is squarely on the strategic sectors,” Carney said.
    A White House official told NBC News that Canada’s move was “long overdue.”
    “We look forward to continuing our discussions with Canada on the Administration’s trade and national security concerns,” the official said.

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    Friday’s announcement follows a phone call between Carney and President Donald Trump, the first known call between the two since failed talks before the Aug. 1 tariff deadline. A readout of the Thursday call from Carney’s office called the conversation “productive and wide-ranging,” with both leaders agreeing to reconvene soon.

    Carney said Friday that Trump assured him that dropping retaliatory tariffs will kick-start negotiations between the two countries.
    The move comes as the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, which Trump negotiated during his first term, is scheduled to undergo a review later this year.
    Canada was swift to impose its counter-tariffs on the U.S. on CA$30 billion, or US$21.7 billion, worth of U.S. goods under then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. In July, Trump announced he would raise tariffs on Canada to 35% and said the rise of fentanyl and Canada’s unwillingness to work with the U.S. affected his decision.
    A total of 43 pounds of the drug was seized at the northern border during 2024 with an additional 58 pounds having been confiscated there so far this year, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
    At the time, Carney said in a post on social media site X that the country was committed to working alongside the U.S. to come to a deal.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Cleveland Fed’s Hammack casts doubt on interest rate cuts amid inflation worries

    Cleveland Federal Reserve President Beth Hammack said Friday she would be hesitant about lowering interest rates as long as inflation remains a threat.
    In a CNBC interview, she said, “I don’t want to move us to a place where we’re being accommodative, because I worry that if we’re accommodative, we could reinvigorate the inflationary pressures.”

    Cleveland Federal Reserve President Beth Hammack said Friday she would be hesitant about lowering interest rates as long as inflation remains a threat.
    In a CNBC interview, the policymaker did not share the market’s enthusiasm for a cut, sparked after Chair Jerome Powell’s keynote speech earlier in the morning stating that current conditions “may warrant” policy easing.

    “I heard that the chair is open-minded about what the right stance of policy is going to be and what the right decision is going to be in September,” Hammack said. “We’ve been above our [inflation] target for four years, and we need to get that under control. So to me, we need to maintain a modestly restrictive stance of policy to get inflation back to target.”
    Hammack acknowledged that her idea of the “neutral” interest rate that neither boosts nor restricts activity is higher than most other Fed officials. The former Goldman Sachs executive is not a voter this year on the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee but will be in 2026.
    “So I don’t really think we have that far to go, which is why I want to make sure we’re maintaining that restrictive stance of policy to get inflation back to target,” she said. “I don’t want to move us to a place where we’re being accommodative, because I worry that if we’re accommodative, we could reinvigorate the inflationary pressures.”
    The Fed has held its benchmark funds rate in a range between 4.25%-4.5% since December 2024. Following Powell’s speech, futures traders priced in a nearly 90% chance that the FOMC would cut in September, according to the CME Group’s FedWatch gauge.
    In a separate CNBC interview Thursday, Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid also expressed skepticism about cutting. Schmid is an FOMC voter this year but won’t be again until 2028.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    The summer box office sizzled, but brace for a cooldown until November

    The domestic box office is expected to reach at least $3.75 billion for the summer season, according to data from Comscore.
    Movie theater operators reported solid audience numbers and ticket sales during the second quarter, which included May and June box office figures.
    But momentum from summer ticket sales is expected to stall until the November release of “Wicked: For Good.”

    Movie stills from Disney’s “Lilo & Stitch” and “Fantastic Four” and Warner Bros. Discovery’s “Superman.”
    Courtesy: Disney | 20th Century Studios | Marvel Studios | Warner Bros. Discovery

    Superheroes, dinosaurs and a genetically altered alien dog helped propel the summer box office haul above 2024 levels, but that momentum is about to stall.
    Heading into the final stretch of the summer season — which started the first weekend in May and wraps up on Labor Day — the domestic box office is expected to reach at least $3.75 billion, according to data from Comscore. That’s about a 2% uptick from the previous summer.

    Hollywood had hoped the 2025 summer would be a return to form for the box office, reaching the $4 billion mark, which had become the standard prior to the pandemic. Ticket sales reached that figure in 2023, thanks to the powerhouse team up of Warner Bros.’ “Barbie” and Universal’s “Oppenheimer.” However, the the past two summers have borne the brunt of production shutdowns caused by the dual writers and actors strikes two years ago.
    Last summer, Disney and Pixar’s “Inside Out 2” and Marvel’s “Deadpool & Wolverine” helped buoy the May-to-August season to $3.67 billion, much higher than box office analysts had predicted earlier in the year.

    Summer box office tallies

    2024 — $3.7 billion
    2023 — $4 billion
    2022 — $3.4 billion
    2021 — $1.7 billion
    2020 — $176.2 million
    2019 — $4.3 billion
    2018 — $4.4 billion
    2017 — $3.8 billion
    2016 — $4.4 billion
    2015 — $4.4 billion
    2014 — $4 billion
    2013 — $4.7 billion*
    2012 — $4.2 billion

    * Record summer box office revenue
    Source: Comscore

    Hollywood had hoped that the combination of major franchise titles — a new entry from the “Jurassic World” series alongside reboots of Superman and the Fantastic Four — would be enough to fuel the 2025 summer stretch to the $4 billion mark. Yet, none of those films generated more than $350 million domestically.

    In fact, the highest-grossing film of the summer has been Disney’s live-action remake of “Lilo & Stitch,” which has tallied $421 million domestically as of Sunday. The second-highest is “Superman,” which stands at $340 million.
    In previous summers, top films like “Inside Out 2,” “Barbie” and “Top: Gun Maverick” each brought in at least $600 million in ticket sales.
    “What started with a historic Memorial Day weekend gave way to a mix of underperformers and crowd-pleasing hits,” said Shawn Robbins, director of analytics at Fandango and founder of Box Office Theory. “The back half of the season rebounded with several blockbusters and sleeper hits, but we continue to see audiences are highly selective when a barrage of franchise movies is out there despite many of those films generating positive reviews. Some connect in a big way, while others simply don’t catch on.”
    Still, movie theater operators reported solid audience numbers and ticket sales during the second quarter, which included May and June box office figures.
    “As to the strengthening industrywide box office, we firmly believe that this was not a short-lived spike, but rather, the beginning of a sustained and powerful resurgence for our entire industry,” Adam Aron, CEO of AMC, said during an earnings call last week.

    Similarly, Cinemark CEO Sean Gamble noted during the company’s earnings call earlier this month that the April release of “A Minecraft Movie,” which ran well into the summer months, alongside “a steady stream of highly compelling new releases week after week, ignited a surge of summer moviegoing momentum.”
    But he also warned that, as is typical in the theatrical business, August and September at the box office tend to “de-throttle a little bit.”
    That is certainly the case this year, as well, but it is likely to extend well into October as well. While “Tron: Ares” and “Mortal Kombat II” are expected to draw in audiences during that month, box office analysts don’t expect a major breakout hit until late November.
    “The post-summer corridor is looking a bit bereft of standout blockbusters,” said Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst at Comscore. “We’ll have to rely on the cumulative success of some low to mid-range performers along with what looks to be a really nice selection of awards caliber and indie films. That said, we may want to brace ourselves for a few fallow weeks at the box office.”
    AMC’s Aron noted that the upcoming third-quarter box office will be “so-so given some seasonal, but not alarming softness,” but told investors to “hold onto your hats for the size of the box office in the fourth quarter.”
    The turning point is expected to come Nov. 21 with the release of Universal’s “Wicked: For Good.” The highly anticipated sequel to last year’s hit “Wicked” is expected to open to over $100 million and steadily collect ticket sales through the rest of the year at the box office.
    “Zootopia 2” arrives for the Thanksgiving holiday and is also expected to exceed $100 million during its opening frame.
    “Avatar: Fire and Ash” will cap off the year and is expected to bolster the box office during the first few weeks of 2026.
    “The final months of the year have potential to be nothing short of stellar,” Robbins said.
    Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal, Fandango and CNBC. More

  • in

    Wage growth is doing something odd in 2025 — the last time it happened was around the Great Recession

    Job “switchers” typically see their wages grow at a faster rate than workers who stay in their current roles.
    However, that trend has reversed for the past six months, since February, data shows.
    Such a reversal rarely occurs outside of periods of weakness in the labor market, economists said.

    A “Now Hiring” sign hangs in the window of a hair salon in the Greater Boston town of Medford, Massachusetts, August 12, 2025.
    Brian Snyder | Reuters

    Wage growth is doing something odd these days.
    Typically, wages grow at a faster clip each year for workers who switch jobs, compared to those who stay in their current role.

    That makes sense: Workers generally leave a job when they find something better for them, which often includes a higher salary, according to labor economists.
    But in 2025, the roles have reversed as workers, faced with a souring job market, shift from job-hopping to “job hugging” — that is, clinging to their current roles.
    Annual wage growth for so-called “job stayers” has eclipsed that of “job switchers” for the past six months, since February, according to data tracked by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.

    The margins aren’t huge: For example, in July, job stayers saw wages grow at a 4.1% annual pace, versus 4% for workers who switched jobs, according to the Atlanta Fed data.
    However, that sustained reversal points to an underlying weakness in the labor market, economists said.

    Since the late 1990s, a prolonged reversal in wage growth trends for job “switchers” versus “stayers” has only happened in periods around the Great Recession and the dot-com bust in the early 2000s, the Atlanta Fed data shows.
    The last time a drawn-out reversal occurred was in and immediately following the Great Recession, during an 18-month period from February 2009 to July 2010, according to the data.
    “We only tend to see it around other times when the labor market has been weak,” said Erica Groshen, a senior economics advisor at the Cornell University School of Industrial and Labor Relations and former commissioner of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2013 to 2017.
    The Atlanta Fed computes a three-month moving average of median hourly wages using data from the Current Population Survey, reported by the U.S. Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    That said, aggregate data on the labor market suggests it’s still in “pretty strong” shape, Groshen said.

    ‘Workers have lost some bargaining power’

    But it has gradually cooled from a torrid pace in recent years.
    Job openings had ballooned to historic highs in 2021 and 2022 as the U.S. economy awoke from its pandemic-era hibernation. Ample opportunity led workers to quit their jobs in record numbers for new employment, commanding big payouts from companies eager to attract talent.
    Now, amid high interest rates and economic uncertainty, job openings have fallen and employers are hiring at their slowest pace in more than a decade.

    “Maybe employers are not feeling that they need to offer their new workers higher wages in order to get them, and workers have lost some bargaining power in the labor market,” Groshen said.
    The quits rate — the rate at which workers are voluntarily leaving their jobs — has also declined sharply. It has hovered around 2% since the start of the year, according to data from the U.S. Labor Department’s Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. Outside of the initial days of the Covid-19 pandemic, levels haven’t been that consistently low since early 2016.
    This is the primary reason why wage growth for job stayers has eclipsed that for job switchers, said Allison Shrivastava, an economist at the job site Indeed.
    A depressed quits rate suggests workers aren’t voluntarily leaving their jobs to find better ones because they don’t have confidence in doing so, Shrivastava said.
    More from Personal Finance:Trump immigration policy may be shrinking labor forceWorking longer to afford retirement is a risky plan’Job hugging’ has replaced job-hopping
    In this “frozen” labor market, in which there’s not a lot of voluntary job-hopping, workers who are forced to leave a job involuntarily are more likely to accept a new job that doesn’t pay as well, she said.
    “They’re more in a situation of taking what they can get,” Shrivastava said.

    Long-term unemployment is increasing

    This is especially true for workers who are considered long-term unemployed, economists said. Long-term unemployment is a period of joblessness lasting at least six months.
    About 25% of all jobless individuals in July were long-term unemployed, the highest share since February 2022, according to U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data.

    Such people are generally no longer eligible for unemployment benefits, economists said.
    “They may be willing to take a job for a lower wage than they were at the beginning,” Groshen said.
    Overall, the best way for workers to improve their wages in aggregate is still probably by switching jobs, Shrivastava.
    “But the opportunity to switch your job right now is not really there,” she said.
    There are ways for jobseekers to set themselves up for success in a tough hiring market, career experts said.
    Among them: Find creative networking opportunities — conferences, seminars, lectures or book signings where other attendees are likely to be in your profession. Jobseekers can look internally for a new job placement, which may be easier than seeking out something external. They can focus on upskilling and reskilling to land a new job more easily when the market rebounds. More

  • in

    Tariffs aren’t dealing a huge blow to big retailers and consumers — yet. Here are key earnings takeaways

    Consumer spending has largely stayed strong so far and the pinch from higher duties hasn’t been as severe as some companies had feared.
    Scot Ciccarelli, a retail analyst for Truist, said retailers are raising prices “but not nearly to the degree that might have been expected in early April.”
    Yet Walmart said it’s seen price sensivity with some lower-income shoppers and Crocs reduced orders for the back half of the year.

    Customer with shopping cart in the snack aisle of a Walmart store in Florida City, Florida in the on August 5, 2025.
    JC Milhet | AFP | Getty Images

    As some of the biggest names in retail, including Walmart and Home Depot, delivered earnings results in recent weeks, they updated Wall Street on how they and their shoppers are responding to President Donald Trump’s wave of tariff increases.
    The takeaway?

    Tariff costs are rising for retailers, and they’ve had to get creative to avoid widespread price hikes.
    Yet consumer spending has largely stayed strong so far — and the pinch from higher duties hasn’t been as severe as some companies had feared. Compared to the spring, retail executives struck a measured tone and said they don’t expect their costs, or customers’ prices, to jump dramatically.
    Walmart had given one of the strongest warnings in May, as CFO John David Rainey said he expected some prices to rise during the summer. In an interview with CNBC on Thursday, however, Rainey said the nation’s biggest retailer has raised prices on some items, but in other parts of its stores has kept prices down or expanded discounts.
    “There are certainly areas where we have fully absorbed the impact of higher tariff costs,” he said. “There are other areas where we’ve had to pass some of those costs along. But when you look across the basket of items, we’re certainly trying to keep prices as low as we can.”
    Scot Ciccarelli, a retail analyst for Truist, said retailers are raising prices “but not nearly to the degree that might have been expected in early April” when Trump first announced his steep tariffs on dozens of countries.

    “Most of the companies are kind of downplaying the impact of tariffs,” he said. “They’ve all talked about substantial mitigation efforts, whether that is diversifying sourcing, whether that is pushing price back to vendors.”
    Here are three takeaways from a busy couple weeks of retail earnings.

    Consumer spending is steady — with some exceptions

    The drumbeat of steady, but selective, U.S. consumer spending continued this quarter.
    At Walmart, the nation’s largest grocer by revenue, sales of private label items, which tend to cost less than national name brands, were roughly flat, Rainey told CNBC. When customers trade down to those cheaper brands or smaller packs of items, it can signal U.S. households feel strapped for cash.
    “Everyone is looking to see if there are any creaks in the armor or anything that’s happening with the consumer, but it’s been very consistent,” Rainey told CNBC. “They continue to be very resilient.”
    Walmart and Coach parent company Tapestry both raised their sales outlooks for the full year. Both companies said they saw healthy sales of discretionary items, such as clothing and handbags.
    Sales of fashion items, including ladies’ apparel and shoes, accelerated at Walmart in the quarter, Rainey said. One of Coach’s handbags, the large Kisslock bag that costs $695, sold out within minutes of launching in July, Tapestry CEO Joanne Crevoiserat said last week on the company’s earnings call.
    Yet some categories are still a tough sell. And lower-income shoppers have been more sensitive to price changes.
    Walmart CEO Doug McMillon said Thursday that the effect of tariffs on spending “has been somewhat muted.” Still, he added some shoppers have noticed and responded when prices creep up.
    “As we replenish inventory at post-tariff price levels, we’ve continued to see our costs increase each week, which we expect will continue into the third and fourth quarters,” he said. “Not surprisingly, we see more adjustments in middle- and lower-income households than we do with higher-income households and discretionary categories where item prices have gone up.”
    Sales at Home Depot and Lowe’s improved as the quarter went on, with the strongest in July. Still, the companies weren’t ready to predict a turnaround for home improvement.
    Lowe’s CEO Marvin Ellison attributed some of the recent pickup in demand to better weather and said “it’s too early for us to call that a trend.” Higher mortgage rates and borrowing costs have dinged homeowners’ willingness to tackle a major renovation or move to a new home, which tends to spur home projects.
    Other brands had more dire warnings about spending. On the company’s earnings call, Crocs CEO Andrew Rees described the backdrop for the second half of the year as “concerning” and said its retail orders are weak.
    He described Crocs’ customer as “super cautious.”
    “They’re not purchasing. They’re not even going to the stores, and we see traffic down,” he said, adding that’s also true at its outlets, which draw more lower-income households.

    Customers shop at a Home Depot store on August 19, 2025 in Chicago, Illinois.
    Scott Olson | Getty Images

    Retailers have blunted the effects of tariffs … so far

    Retailers have jumped into action to try to minimize cost increases from tariffs or avoid them altogether.
    Those tactics have included importing goods from a wider range of countries, getting items to the U.S. early and stocking up on high-frequency purchases or fresh merchandise that consumers are more likely to buy, even at higher prices, according to interviews of retail executives and earnings calls.
    Yet as Walmart showed, retailers have been strategic about price increases — to not only avoid spooking customers, but also to dodge potential scrutiny from the White House. Trump criticized Walmart in May after the company warned it would have to raise prices.
    Sharkninja, which makes a wide range of items including blenders and hairstyling tools, has “increased sell price on products, but done it very, very carefully,” CEO Mark Barrocas said in an interview. And in some cases, it had to roll back part of those price increases, he said.
    The company has also reduced discounting and raised the price of new merchandise when it debuts. For example, Sharkninja initially planned to launch a new infrared skin care mask called CryoGlow at $299, but instead decided to price it at $349, he said.
    For Walmart, Target and Tapestry-owned Coach, importing goods early and having merchandise in warehouses before tariffs took effect have helped them curb the hit from higher rates.
    Home Depot Chief Financial Officer Richard McPhail told CNBC most of the imported products the company sold during the quarter landed ahead of tariffs. And Home Depot is taking more steps to blunt the effects: more than half of what the company sells comes from the U.S. and it aims to import no more than 10% from any single country by the end of the year.
    Yet the tariff bill is still adding up. Walmart’s McMillion said he expects higher costs from duties to continue through the second half of the fiscal year. Other companies also provided specific estimates of how much the higher duties will cost them.
    Even as Tapestry posted sales growth, its shares tumbled last week after it said costs from higher duties would total $160 million this upcoming fiscal year and ding profits.
    While Trump’s tariff policy appears more settled than in the spring, tariffs on some countries could still rise.
    Many of Trump’s tariffs on countries began in early August, but one of the key rates still hangs in the balance. He delayed higher tariffs on China for 90 days last week. Those had jumped as high as 145%, but are now at 30% as negotiations continue.
    Target acknowledged the trade uncertainty with its own strategy. It gave a wider than usual range for its full-year earnings per share outlook.

    Inside a Crocs store at Queens Center in New York.
    Ryan Baker | CNBC

    Strong brands, new moneymakers matter more than ever

    Strong brand loyalty and lucrative new businesses have made it easier for some companies to weather the uncertainty.
    As homeowners postpone larger projects, Home Depot and Lowe’s have bulked up their business among home professionals to attract steadier traffic and prepare for when demand picks up again. Along with reporting earnings this week, Lowe’s announced it’s buying Foundation Building Materials for $8.8 billion. It marked its second acquisition of a home professional-focused company in recent months.
    Home Depot announced its own pro-focused deal earlier this summer and made the largest acquisition in its history when it bought SRS Distribution last year.
    Walmart also has benefited from newer revenue streams, especially its advertising business and third-party marketplace. Global advertising grew 46% in the most recent quarter, including ad-enabled smart TV maker Vizio, which it acquired last year.
    Its marketplace revenue grew by 17% year over year. That business includes sellers who get charged a commission and often pay for services, such as ads on Walmart’s site to promote their products or fulfillment services to have the big-box retailer store, pack and ship orders to customers.
    Those “more diversified set of profit streams,” which have higher margins than selling a gallon of milk or a T-shirt, make Walmart’s earnings steadier even as the company faces profit pressures, Rainey said on the company’s earnings call.
    “We are more than just a standard brick-and-mortar retail business,” he said on the call.
    For some brands, customer demand is high enough to help offset tariffs or allow them to charge more.
    Sandal maker Birkenstock, for instance, “saw no pushback or cancellations” after its tariff-related July 1 price increases, CEO Oliver Reichert said on the company’s earnings call.
    Coach, which has driven up its average price of items over the past five years and reduced its level of markdowns, can better “absorb a lot of these input costs,” Coach CEO Todd Kahn told CNBC.
    On the flip side, tariff costs have hit some brands harder, especially if they don’t have the new products customers seem to want or are skittish about what sales will look like later this year. High-performing companies with massive scale like Walmart often have leverage with vendors to pass on costs — but other businesses might not.
    “If you’re a struggling brand, or you’re not really growing your business with a vendor, that vendor has less incentive to absorb incremental costs, whether it’s from tariffs or supply chain or whatever,” Truist’s Ciccarelli said.
    Target said its profit margins in the quarter were hurt by the costs of cancelling orders. Crocs also said it is reducing orders for the back half of the year.
    Crocs took another usual step: Rees said the company is taking back older inventory from retailers that sell its Heydude shoe brand and swapping it out with fresher styles. More

  • in

    John Deere faces a crossroads amid decreasing demand, increasing investments

    John Deere is positioning itself in what’s been a struggling broader agricultural sector, citing weaker demand and taking significant losses in sales.
    The company laid off hundreds of workers in its latest round of layoffs last week.
    Still, Deere and Wall Street analysts remain optimistic that the company is hitting a bottom this year and will turn around in the longer term.

    Attendees view a John Deere 7R 270 row crop tractor at the Deere & Co. booth during the World Ag Expo at the International Agri-Center in Tulare, California on February 11, 2025.
    Patrick T. Fallon | AFP | Getty Images

    John Deere is facing a crossroads as the company continues to see weaker demand in the agricultural sector even while it has committed to investing millions in U.S. manufacturing and promised a brighter road ahead.
    The agricultural machinery company warned on its fiscal third-quarter earnings call last week that it is seeing much softer demand, posting significant year-over-year decreases in net income and sales.

    The company is working to position itself in the larger agricultural sector, which has seen growing challenges with rising costs, climate change impacts, labor shortages and more.
    Farmers have also been dealing with lower prices on crops like corn and grain and have pared back their spending as a result. In turn, Deere’s target audience has pulled back on its willingness to buy new agricultural equipment.
    Deere has also been hit by tariff costs, estimating that it could take a $600 million hit for the fiscal 2025 year. The company has already seen $300 million in tariff expenses year to date.
    Just after reporting its earnings, the company confirmed to CNBC that it announced 238 layoffs across its Illinois and Iowa factories, adding to thousands who have been laid off over the past year. The company cited decreased demand and lower order volumes as the main factors behind the job reductions.
    “As stated on our most recent earnings call, the struggling ag economy continues to impact orders for John Deere equipment,” Deere told CNBC in a statement. “This is a challenging time for many farmers, growers and producers, and directly impacts our business in the near term.”

    The manufacturer employs more than 70,000 people globally.
    Still, Deere has identified enough green shoots to point to a less-troubling future.
    On its most recent earnings call, company executives emphasized the growth in demand in both Europe and South America after seeing weakness in North America. Despite macroeconomic headwinds, Deere’s president of its worldwide agriculture and turf division said the company remains confident in its future.
    “We think there’s positive tail winds from both what we see in the trade deals, and we think there are positive tail winds from what we see in tax policy,” Cory Reed said on the call.
    And in June, the company released a statement that “myth busted” any claims that Deere might need to shut down its U.S. manufacturing due to the fall in demand. Instead, the company said it was making a “bold move” to invest $20 billion into U.S. manufacturing over the next 10 years.
    It follows a similar string of announcements from companies trying to shore up their “Made in the USA” bona fides since President Donald Trump took office. Before the election, Trump threatened Deere with 200% tariffs if it moved production to factories in Mexico.
    “Over the next decade, we will continue to make significant investments in our core U.S. market,” CEO John May said in the statement in June. “This underscores our dedication to innovation and growth while staying cost-competitive in a global market.”

    What Wall Street is saying

    Despite the struggles in the broader agricultural sector, Wall Street analysts on the whole remain optimistic about Deere’s road ahead.
    Oppenheimer analyst Kristen Owen wrote last week that she remains bullish on Deere and expects increased confidence into 2026, telling CNBC that she believes the company is taking an “appropriately cautiously optimistic outlook.”
    Even Truist analyst Jamie Cook, who lowered his target after Deere’s earnings last week and emphasized an uncertain outlook for 2026, said he still believes this year marks a bottoming for the company’s earnings per share.
    The company’s stock has seen a nearly 30% increase over the one-year period.

    Stock chart icon

    Deere stock

    Looking at Deere’s history and the hit that the farming industry has taken over the past few years, D.A. Davidson analyst Michael Shlisky told CNBC he can’t imagine the company going much lower from here.
    “The way I’d say it is 2025 could be the worst, the lowest number of tractor sales in the history of modern agriculture,” he said, with the potential for the trend to swing upward becoming imminent.
    While the optimism might not be directly translating to sales today, Shlisky said the “hints” of progress are enough to make him excited about the company’s future, including the growth in Europe and South America.
    “When parts of the world are doing better, the parts that aren’t doing as well are likely to follow,” Shlisky said.
    While not commenting directly on the latest round of layoffs, Shlisky said he doesn’t think investors would be surprised to see the necessary cost-cutting measures at this point in the company’s trajectory.
    Similarly, Morgan Stanley analysts wrote in a note that while demand may be decreasing, they stand behind a thesis that Deere earnings have bottomed and that the company remains an “attractive opportunity longer term.”
    Analyst Angel Castillo told CNBC that Deere and the agricultural sector at large are cyclical, so while the short-term remains uncertain, the long-term outlook for the company is likely to bounce back, noting that precision agriculture in particular is likely to take off.
    “This is one of the unique areas where we think even if there’s more challenges next year, as we kind of expect, the earnings downside risk is much more de-risked or already captured by expectation,” Castillo said.
    With its latest cost-cutting measures, Deere is saving itself by not overproducing or creating a supply chain issue, Castillo added.
    “The reality today is that we’re still in an uncertain environment, and I think they’re managing in a disciplined, rational way to try to make sure not to create a worse environment,” he said.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More