More stories

  • in

    How a $1.4tn Trump trade war could unfold

    $75 per monthComplete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders. Pay a year upfront and save 20%.What’s included Global news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts20 monthly gift articles to shareLex: FT’s flagship investment column15+ Premium newsletters by leading expertsFT Digital Edition: our digitised print edition More

  • in

    Trump Administration Tallies Trade Barriers That Could Prompt Tariffs

    The Office of the United States Trade Representative released a report highlighting foreign trade barriers that could influence tariffs the president puts into effect this week.President Trump is set to announce on Wednesday global tariffs that he says will combat unfair trade treatment by other countries and make sure American exporters remain competitive.On Monday, the Office of the United States Trade Representative released a wide-ranging report on foreign trade barriers that could hint at some of the trade battles the Trump administration aims to fight.In an annual report, the office listed the most important barriers to U.S. exports in dozens of countries. Those obstacles included tariffs, but also laws, regulations and policies that the administration said undermine competition. Here are eight of the most consequential trading partners for the United States that could be targeted in the president’s tariff announcements this week.ChinaThe report dedicated almost 50 of its nearly 400 pages to China, which has long been a subject of trade criticism for American officials and companies.The report criticized China as using industrial planning and other policies to support certain sectors it had targeted for “domination,” such as robotics, aerospace, new energy vehicles and biopharmaceuticals. The trade representative’s office argued that those tools sometimes worked by discriminating against or taking advantage of foreign enterprises, and that the program had allowed Chinese firms to win market share at the expense of foreign competitors.The office also pointed out that China had not followed through in rolling out provisions of the trade deal signed with Mr. Trump in his first term, including commitments to open up its agricultural market and protect U.S. intellectual property. Trade data also shows that China fell far short of commitments it made to purchase U.S. goods and services in 2020 and 2021, the report said.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    How well will UK consumers withstand the April price rises?

    UK consumers are about to be hit by a series of price increases from this month, in what parts of the British media are dubbing “awful April”. Increases to water, energy and telecoms bills will push up inflation, even as chancellor Rachel Reeves’ £25bn boost to employers’ national insurance kicks in, leading employers both to raise prices and to curb wages.Kemi Badenoch, Conservative party leader, will cite the price increases as she attacks the Labour government, warning that the “true cost of Rachel Reeves will really hit home with a vicious cocktail of bill increases and price rises”. Mel Stride, shadow chancellor, has called April 1 “Rachel’s Cruel Day”.While the increases will hit many households hard, they come at a time when surveys point to greater optimism among consumers, thanks in part to strong inflation-adjusted wage growth in 2024. Here are the prices that are set to move — and the likely economic and political fallout. What prices are being increased? Regulated energy bills are set to rise by 6 per cent to £1,849 for a typical household, while average water bills are set to climb by 26 per cent to £603. Council tax rises will also come through, with some local authorities permitted to push through larger increases than the 4.99 per cent usually allowed before triggering a local vote. On top of this, many customers will face increases in other charges, for example, on broadband and mobile phone services. Meanwhile, the government’s increase in employer national insurance and minimum wages kicks in from April 6. Companies are expected to offset this through a mix of hiring freezes, lower pay awards and price increases. “It is just a load of price hikes coming all at once — and on things you by and large can’t avoid,” said Paul Dales, chief UK economist at Capital Economics. What does it mean for inflation? The price rises are bound to push up inflation in the short term and are a main reason why the Bank of England expects CPI inflation to hit 3.7 per cent in the third quarter of 2025. Chris Hare, senior economist at HSBC, said last week that even though discounting by fashion retailers pulled CPI inflation down to 2.8 per cent in February, there was still “a fairly pronounced and persistent inflation ‘hump’ above 3 per cent” on the way that would run into 2026. The BoE has said it does not expect this to have any lingering consequences for underlying inflationary pressures in the economy. But there are two big sources of uncertainty: how far businesses will seek to pass higher labour costs on to consumers, as opposed to squeezing wages; and whether the UK will retaliate if it falls victim to rounds of US tariffs. The Office for Budget Responsibility, the fiscal watchdog, estimates that 60 per cent of the NICs increase will be passed on through lower wages or higher prices in 2025-26, its first year of operation. How well will households weather the shock? The saving grace is that the price increases follow a long period of strong wage growth. Earnings rose nearly 6 per cent over the past year, according to the latest official data, comfortably outpacing inflation.Households appear to have been stashing much of this away, saving 12 per cent of their income in the final three months of 2024 — the highest on record outside the Covid-19 pandemic. They may now be ready to start spending again, with the latest data showing a rebound in retail sales and slower flows into savings accounts. “UK consumers seem to be finding their feet again,” said Robert Wood, chief UK economist at the consultancy Pantheon Macroeconomics. “Perhaps the big hit from higher interest rates is now behind us,” said Sandra Horsfield, economist at Investec. But she warned that surveys were now pointing to a slowdown in wage growth, even as businesses raised prices in response to the rise in payroll taxes. “Real wage growth going forwards won’t be as strong,” she said. “That will naturally place a limit on how much extra consumer spending we will get.” How is it playing politically? The idea that Labour is hitting living standards is a critical part of the Conservative campaign ahead of the local elections on May 1, with Badenoch admitting her party faces an “extremely difficult” battle in the weeks ahead.Labour insists that April 1 will be seen by many families as a good day, thanks to an increase in the national living wage that will be worth an extra £1,400 per year for an eligible full-time worker. The rate for those aged over 21 will rise from £11.44 an hour to £12.21.“This pay rise for over 3mn of the lowest-paid workers was a priority for this government,” said deputy prime minister Angela Rayner. “We’re already giving hard-working people more money in their pockets and a proper wage increase worth over twice the rate of inflation.”But the Tories have totted up average bill increases taking effect in April, even as Labour denies that it is responsible for many of the price hikes. The Conservatives say energy bills are rising by an average of £111 a year, council tax by £109, water bills by £123, car tax by £5, broadband bills by £36, phone bills by £46 and TV licences by £5. Nursery fees are expected to rise by £756 a year on average, which the party blames on Reeves’ national insurance increase on employers. More

  • in

    Argentina’s poverty rate falls as Milei tames inflation

    Unlock the Editor’s Digest for freeRoula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.The share of Argentina’s population living in poverty fell sharply in the second half of 2024, the country’s national statistics agency announced on Monday, in a boost for libertarian President Javier Milei in his battle against high inflation. The poverty rate fell to 38 per cent in the second half of last year — the lowest since 2022 — down from 53 per cent in the first half of the year, when triple-digit annual inflation left a majority of people unable to afford a basket of basic goods. Milei, who took office in December 2023, implemented a “shock therapy” package including a sharp devaluation of the peso, sweeping spending cuts and the removal of price caps, unleashing price pressures that had been building after the previous left-leaning government printed billions of dollars to fund spending.The president’s office said Monday’s poverty statistics “reflect the failure of past policies, which sunk millions of Argentines into [poverty] even as they claimed that they were helping the poor”.“The current administration is demonstrating that the path of economic freedom and fiscal responsibility is the way to reduce poverty in the long term,” it added.Marcelo J. García, America’s director for the geopolitical risk consultancy Horizon Engage, said the figure was “a good number” for the government. But he warned the “real challenge” would be to keep poverty decreasing as Milei begins to loosen Argentina’s strict currency controls, which may lead to volatility in the peso and spikes in price pressures. “The poverty line in Argentina is very sensitive to inflation, and there is a big question mark about how the economic programme will manage to continue to slow down prices given the increasing pressure on the peso,” García said.Argentina’s economy emerged from a recession in the third quarter of 2024, and the IMF has projected it will grow by 5 per cent in 2025. Meanwhile, annual inflation has fallen from its peak last April of 289 per cent to 66 per cent this February.But millions of Argentines are still feeling economic pain. Monday’s figures show 11.3mn were living in poverty in late 2024, including 52 per cent under the age of 14.Milei’s critics say the poor have paid a high price for Argentina’s economic stability, with a big chunk of the president’s fiscal savings last year coming from cuts to pensions and social programmes.But analysts say pensions and private sector incomes have recovered to about late 2023 levels in recent months.Milei faces a number of pressing economic challenges, however, including sealing an IMF deal to replenish Argentina’s scarce foreign exchange reserves, which he needs to keep the peso stable and repay the nation’s debts.Uncertainty about the conditions of the IMF deal, which Milei has said is worth $20bn and will be delivered in April, has unnerved investors this month, with the peso’s parallel exchange rate weakening 8 per cent. More

  • in

    American Wealth Is at a Record High. Sentiment Is Low, and Falling.

    America is more prosperous than ever.U.S. household net worth reached a new peak at the end of 2024. The unemployment rate has levitated just above record lows for three years. The overall debt that households are carrying compared with the assets they own is also near a record low.But even a land of plenty has its shortcomings, influencing both perceptions and realities of how Americans are doing.The U.S. economy remains deeply unequal, with vast gaps in wealth and financial security persisting even as inflation has ebbed and incomes have risen. And data designed to capture the overall population may be obscuring challenges experienced by a broad range of Americans, especially those in the bottom half of the wealth or income spectrum. More

  • in

    Trump’s Tariff Agenda Bets on Americans Giving Up Cheap Goods

    Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent argues that the American dream is about more than cheap televisions, but inflation-weary consumers might disagree.Follow the latest news on the Trump administration.President Trump’s sweeping tariffs are expected to raise the cost of cars, electronics, metals, lumber, pharmaceuticals and other products that American consumers and businesses buy from overseas.But Mr. Trump and his advisers are betting that they can sell an inflation-weary public on a provocative idea: Cheap stuff is not the American dream.“I couldn’t care less if they raise prices, because people are going to start buying American-made cars,” Mr. Trump said on NBC’s Meet the Press show on Sunday in response to fears of foreign car prices spiking.The notion that there is more to life than low-cost imports is an acknowledgment that tariffs could impose additional costs on Americans. It is also a pitch that the burden will be worth it. Mr. Trump’s ability to convince consumers that it is acceptable to pay more to support domestic manufacturing and adhere to his “America First” agenda could determine whether the president’s second term is a success or a calamity.But it is not an easy sell. The onslaught of tariffs has roiled markets and dampened consumer confidence. Auto tariffs that go into effect on Thursday will add a 25 percent tax on imports of cars and car parts, likely upending pricing in the sector. Mr. Trump has already imposed tariffs of 20 percent on Chinese goods and more are expected later this week, when the president announces his “reciprocal” tariffs on major trading partners, including those in Asia and Europe.In confronting anxiety over the trade uncertainty, Mr. Trump and his top economic aides have resorted to asking Americans to think about the bigger picture. They espouse the view that Mr. Trump’s trade wars are necessary to correct decades of economic injustice and that paying a bit more should be a matter of national pride.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    Estimates Imply That Trump Tariffs Could Fall Heavily on Consumers

    President Trump has said that the global tariffs he plans to announce this week will correct decades of unfair relationships and stop other countries from ripping off the United States. But whether the president’s so-called reciprocal tariffs will result in higher levies on other nations or lower ones remains unclear.The president has described his global tariffs as a negotiating tool that could force other countries to drop their trade barriers to American products and result in more goods flowing across borders.But the president has also talked about the tariffs as a way to raise revenue for the government and shift supply chains back to the United States. For those goals to be accomplished, relatively high tariffs would have to be imposed, and not dropped.Those conflicting goals will come to a head this week, when Mr. Trump is expected to reveal the details of his reciprocal tariff plan. Mr. Trump has taken to calling April 2 “liberation day,” saying it will represent the country breaking free of past trade relationships that he says have hurt the United States.It’s not yet clear what Mr. Trump will announce. His advisers have been weighing several different strategies and legal authorities, some of which would be more focused on raising revenue, and others that would be geared toward negotiations and opening global markets, three people familiar with the plans said. Some of the plans under consideration could take effect immediately, while others would take more time but be more insulated from legal challenges.Mr. Trump will be the ultimate decision maker, as recent tariff actions have shown. Some of his own advisers, along with the business community, have been surprised by some of the actions he’s announced in recent weeks, such as placing levies on auto parts.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    Trump Science Funding Cuts May Hurt Economy, Experts Say

    Since World War II, U.S. research funding has led to discoveries that fueled economic gains. Now cutbacks are seen as putting that legacy in jeopardy.President Trump’s tariffs could drive up prices. His efforts to reduce the federal work force could increase unemployment. But ask economists which of the administration’s policies they are most concerned about and many point to cuts to federal support for scientific research.The Trump administration in recent weeks has canceled or frozen billions of dollars in federal grants made to researchers through the National Institutes of Health, and has moved to sharply curtail funding for academic medical centers and other institutions. It has also, through the initiative called the Department of Government Efficiency, tried to fire hundreds of workers at the National Science Foundation, an independent federal agency. And it has revoked the visas of hundreds of foreign-born students.To economists, the policies threaten to undermine U.S. competitiveness in emerging areas like artificial intelligence, and to leave Americans as a whole poorer, less healthy and less productive in the decades ahead.“Universities are tremendously important engines of innovation,” said Sabrina Howell, a New York University professor who has studied the role of the federal government in supporting innovation. “This is really killing the goose that lays the golden egg.”Scientists have warned that the United States risks losing its status as a leader in cutting-edge research and its reputation as a magnet for top scientific minds from around the world.Already, labs across the country have begun laying off workers and canceling projects — in some cases stopping clinical trials that were already underway — and top universities including Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania have announced hiring freezes. France and other countries have begun recruiting American scientists, promising a more welcoming environment.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More