More stories

  • in

    Thai finance minister talks liquidity, debt woes with central bank chief

    BANGKOK (Reuters) – Thailand’s finance minister said he had met the central bank governor on Thursday and discussed the issue of high household debt and the need for liquidity, as he made another pitch for a rate cut to spur revival of a sluggish economy. Lowering rates would help increase liquidity and help those who are creditworthy to access new loans as they recover, Pichai Chunhavajira said after emerging from a meeting with Bank of Thailand chief Sethaput Suthiwartnarueput that lasted nearly two hours. “We want to see more liquidity and the BOT is in agreement,” he said, adding financial institutions in Thailand were risk adverse. The BOT in August held key interest rates at a decade-high of 2.50% for a fifth straight meeting, so far resisting calls from the government for a rate cut. Pichai said monetary easing would help improve credit access. He did not say what the BOT governor said of interest rates during the meeting.The central bank declined to comment on what was discussed as its next monetary policy review is on Oct. 16. Thailand’s economy, Southeast Asia’s second-biggest, has recovered from the pandemic only slowly and is lagging regional peers, shackled by a slowing manufacturing sector and stubbornly high levels of household debt. Its household debt to GDP ratio was 89.6% at the end of the second quarter, or 16.3 trillion baht ($506.53 billion), among the highest levels in Asia. The finance ministry and central bank will meet again this month to discuss the inflation rate target in more detail, Pichai added. Thailand’s inflation target range of 1% to 3% is reviewed annually with agreement from the BOT and Finance Ministry before cabinet approval by the end of the year. The meeting, plans for which were first reported by Reuters, follows months of government pressure to cut rates and align with fiscal policy aimed at stimulating the economy.Pichai expects an agreement over inflation target this month with 2024 inflation coming in under 1%.The two also discussed global events that triggered capital inflow, resulting in baht’s recent rally, he said.Fourth quarter exports should do well, despite the strong currency, he added. Thai exports, a key engine of the economy, are expected to grow 2% this year, but the baht’s rally is posing the a big challenge for the rest of the year, businesses said. More

  • in

    US planned layoffs dip in September, recruitment firm Challenger says

    Firms announced 72,821 layoffs last month, down 4% from the 75,891 announced in August, which had been the highest since March, outplacement firm Challenger, Gray and Christmas said.For the year-to-date, however, announced staff reductions through September of 609,242 are 0.8% higher than through the first nine months of 2023, exceeding the prior year’s running total for the first time this year. That running total is the highest since 2020, the year the COVID-19 pandemic struck, when nearly 2.1 million layoffs were announced through that year’s first nine months.That increase, however, has not so far been paralleled by other data measuring job losses, such as the Labor Department’s weekly report on filings for unemployment benefits. In the week ended Sept. 21, for instance, filings for new claims slid to a four-month low and the level of overall benefits rolls has shown little change in recent months.”We’re at an inflection point now, where the labor market could stall or tighten,” said Andrew Challenger, senior vice president of Challenger, Gray and Christmas. There are signs the U.S. job market is cooling off, enough so that the Federal Reserve has shifted its efforts to defending employment after a singular focus on battling inflation beginning in early 2022. With inflation now nearing its 2% target, Fed officials last month cut their benchmark interest rate by half a percentage point and forecast more cuts ahead, hoping that will ease financial pressures on households and businesses and allow job growth to continue.”It will take a few months for the drop in interest rates to impact employer costs, as well as consumer savings accounts,” Challenger said. “Consumer spending is projected to increase, which may lead to more demand for workers in consumer-facing sectors.”The technology sector led the September total with 11,430 announced job cuts, though the industry has seen 23% fewer reductions so far this year than in 2023. Indeed, other major sectors like healthcare, services and finance have also seen fewer announcements this year than last.Artificial intelligence was cited as the reason for nearly half of the tech sector’s cuts. Since AI has been tracked as a reason for layoffs in May 2023, nearly 17,000 job cuts have been attributed to it.The Challenger report comes ahead of the monthly nonfarm payrolls report due Friday from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. According to a Reuters poll of economists, that is expected to show employers added 140,000 new jobs in September, little changed from the 142,000 positions created in August. The unemployment rate is forecast to remain unchanged at 4.2%. More

  • in

    Global stocks dip, oil gains further on Middle East conflict

    LONDON (Reuters) – Global stocks dipped as European and Asian share indexes broadly retreated on Thursday, while oil prices rose further as markets weighed the risk of a widening Middle East conflict. Euro zone stocks were last down 0.5% , as investors digested weak business activity survey data from the bloc, while MSCI’s all-country index slipped 0.2%.Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan had earlier shed 1%, largely driven by Hong Kong stocks sagging after a sizzling rally, while several markets, including mainland China and South Korea, were closed for the day.Japan’s Nikkei bucked the trend, up 2% after the country’s newly elected prime minister Shigeru Ishiba said it was not the time to raise rates after meeting central bank governor Kazuo Ueda. Bank of Japan board member Asahi Noguchi later said rates would increase cautiously and slowly.Nasdaq futures fell 0.3% and S&P futures slipped 0.2%.Geopolitical tensions loomed large, after Israel bombed Beirut early on Thursday, following a year of clashes with Iran-backed Hezbollah.Oil prices gained on Thursday as concerns grew that the conflict could disrupt crude oil flows from the key exporting region, overshadowing a stronger global supply outlook. Brent and U.S. crude futures gained more than $1 each and were up at $75.27 and $71.52 respectively. “Oil’s had a good week. But in context, you’re looking at kind of low 70s versus summer levels in the 80s. So I don’t think there’s a signal from the market to say, brace yourself for major escalation… But it’s a volatile situation,” said Eren Osman, managing director of wealth management at Arbuthnot Latham.SAFE HAVEN FLOWS MUTEDSafe haven flows in the wider market have so far been muted. Spot gold dipped 0.4% on the day to $2,646.25, but remained near a record high.Treasury yields rose on Wednesday after a strong private payrolls report added to evidence of a healthy U.S labour market, lessening the risk of a big downside miss for Friday’s non-farm payrolls data.Two-year Treasury yields were last at 3.6642% on Thursday, while 10-year yields were at 3.8075%.Markets imply a 36% chance the Fed will cut interest rates by another 50 basis points in November, compared with almost 60% last week, and have around 70 basis points of easing priced in by year-end.In currencies, the euro was broadly flat at $1.10415, and not far from Wednesday’s low of $1.10325, a level last seen on Sept. 12, while the US dollar index gained 0.2% to 101.87. Sterling fell 1.1% to $1.3116 after Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey told the Guardian newspaper that the central bank could become a “bit more aggressive” on rate cuts if inflation continued to ease. More

  • in

    Bank of England could become ‘more aggressive’ on rate cuts, Bailey says

    LONDON (Reuters) – The Bank of England could move more aggressively to cut interest rates if inflation pressures continue to weaken but conflict in the Middle East could push up oil prices, Governor Andrew Bailey said.Bailey told the Guardian newspaper the BoE could become “a bit more activist” and “a bit more aggressive” in its approach to lowering rates, if there was further welcome news on inflation for the central bank.Sterling – which has strengthened recently as investors saw fewer interest rates cuts in Britain than in other countries – was down by more than a cent against the U.S. dollar at 1025 GMT, on track for its biggest daily fall in almost six months.It also looked set for its sharpest daily drop against the euro in almost two years.Investors were assigning a 97% chance of a quarter-point interest rate cut by the BoE at its November meeting. On Wednesday, the chance of a cut next month was priced at 90%. The BoE’s benchmark Bank Rate now sits at 5% after August’s first reduction in borrowing costs in four years. The British central bank kept rates on hold last month but investors expect another quarter-point cut at its November meeting.Rob Wood, chief UK economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, said the central bank seemed to be heading towards a speeding up of its rate cuts but the Monetary Policy Committee would still need to see an easing in wage growth and price pressure to cut borrowing costs in consecutive meetings. “The bar to MPC rate cuts in back-to-back meetings is falling, leaving the risks to our Bank Rate forecast skewed to faster cuts,” he said. “That said, we think the latest DMP fails to green light those faster cuts, with wage growth and price rises proving stubborn.” The BoE’s Decision Maker Panel survey and separate services sector data, both published on Thursday, suggested inflation pressures in the economy were weakening but remained stronger than normal.The DMP survey showed expectations for wage growth in the coming 12 months stood at 4.1%, down from an increase of 5.7% in the three months to September although it was unchanged for a third survey in a row.Services companies reported that the prices they charged rose at the slowest pace in nearly four years. The Guardian quoted Bailey as saying he was encouraged by how inflation pressures had proven less persistent than the Bank feared but the events in the Middle East posed a risk.”Geopolitical concerns are very serious,” Bailey told the newspaper. “It’s tragic what’s going on. There are obviously stresses and the real issue then is how they might interact with some still quite stretched markets in places.”He said there appeared to be “a strong commitment to keep the (oil) market stable” but “there’s a point beyond which that control could break down if things got really bad. You have to continuously watch this thing, because it could go wrong.” More

  • in

    How to fragment the global economy

    Save over 65%$99 for your first yearFT newspaper delivered Monday-Saturday, plus FT Digital Edition delivered to your device Monday-Saturday.What’s included Weekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysis More

  • in

    Trump and Harris Want to Revive Manufacturing, but How Much Could They Actually Do?

    The policy focus on the industry has changed from job quantity to job quality. And while federal incentives matter, local factors are more important.In recent weeks, the presidential candidates have been tussling over a familiar campaign issue in postindustrial America: how to reinvigorate manufacturing.Former President Donald J. Trump has proposed stiff tariffs on nearly all imports as a way of forcing foreign companies to make their goods in the United States, an escalation of a strategy that did not work during his term. “We’re going to take their factories,” Mr. Trump declared recently.Building on the Biden administration’s approach, Vice President Kamala Harris has promised tax credits and more apprenticeships to strengthen factory towns and invest in advanced technologies, ensuring they “are not just invented in America but built here.”In truth, no president can single-handedly control the growth of specific industries. Larger economic forces like recessions and exchange rates tend to play a much more powerful role. But some policies can help or hinder their progress.Over the last four years, policy and macroeconomic factors have combined to begin reshaping the manufacturing industry. While job growth has been flat for the past two years — as interest rates have clamped down on expansion and a strong dollar has dulled exports — shifts in the composition and location of it are underway beneath the surface.But first, a more fundamental question: Why do politicians care so much about manufacturing, anyway?Which manufacturing sectors have been growing fastest?Domestic output of semiconductors and other electrical components has expanded by 30 percent since the beginning of 2020. Other products, not as much.

    Notes: The semiconductor category includes other components. Source: Federal ReserveBy The New York TimesWhere manufacturing jobs have shifted since the pandemicBetween January 2020 and March 2024, the West Coast and Northeast have lost factory employment while many states in the Southeast have gained.

    Source: Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, Labor DepartmentBy The New York TimesWe are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    World Braces for Bigger Trade Wars if Trump Wins

    Business owners and foreign governments are preparing for high tariffs and trade disruptions, depending on the outcome of the election.When you’re in the whiskey business, you’re always making predictions about the future.From the time grain grown around the Midwest enters Sonat Birnecker Hart’s distillery on the North Side of Chicago, it will be four to 10 years before the whiskey is shipped to buyers. So running her business requires careful projections about demand.Those calculations have become harder of late. With the U.S. presidential election looming, many businesses around the world are facing uncertainty about the future of American trade policy and the tariffs that products will face in global markets.For the whiskey industry, the stakes are particularly high. In March, a 50 percent tariff on American whiskey exports to Europe will snap into effect unless the European Union and the United States can come to an agreement to stop the levies.The outcome may depend on who is in office. Both former President Donald J. Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris have embraced tariffs, but their plans differ significantly. Ms. Harris’s campaign has said she would use tariffs in a “targeted” fashion — possibly mirroring the approach of President Biden, who recently imposed tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, silicon chips and solar panels. Like Mr. Biden, she has emphasized working closely with allies.Mr. Trump, in contrast, has said his approach to trade would be even more aggressive than the trade wars of his first term, when he imposed stiff tariffs on allies and rivals to obtain concessions and try to bolster American manufacturing. He has proposed a 60 percent tariff on products from China and a tariff of more than 10 percent on other goods from around the world.A 50 percent tariff on American whiskey exports to Europe will take effect in March unless the United States and European Union reach an agreement.Taylor Glascock for The New York TimesWe are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More