More stories

  • in

    Moncler CEO strengthens grip on company with LVMH deal

    MILAN/PARIS (Reuters) -Moncler’s Chairman and CEO Remo Ruffini is tightening his control of the outerwear specialist after striking a deal with LVMH, which will partner with Ruffini to fund an expanded investment in the Italian company. The deal also strengthens French group LVMH’s dominance of the global luxury sector. Milan-based Moncler, one of the industry’s biggest success stories in recent years, had been seen as a potential acquisition target or merger candidate for rival luxury groups seeking to expand.Under the deal announced late on Thursday, LVMH purchased a 10% stake in Double R, the investment vehicle controlled by the CEO’s Ruffini Partecipazioni Holding, which currently has a 15.8% stake in Moncler. Double R will increase its stake in Moncler up to 18.5% over the next 18 months, thanks to the funding provided by LVMH that will increase its investment in Double R up to 22%, Ruffini Partecipazioni Holding and LVMH said in a statement. Over the last nine months, two investors in Double R had exited the vehicle and were paid with Moncler shares, which had reduced Ruffini’s control of the company.The partnership with LVMH will reinforce Ruffini’s position as the largest shareholder of Moncler, the companies said. LVMH will gain the right to appoint two board members to Double R, solely controlled by Ruffini, as well as a director on Moncler’s board. Investors have grown jittery about a slowdown in the luxury sector, particularly weakness in the key Chinese market, hit by slowing economic growth and a property crisis. But Moncler has proven resilient, with 11% revenue growth in the first half of the year, thanks to double-digit growth in Asia. More

  • in

    Cassava Sciences shares fall after SEC charges for misleading Alzheimer’s drug trial claims

    The misleading statements were made in September 2020 about the results of a phase two clinical trial for Cassava’s purported drug treatment for Alzheimer’s, the SEC said.Cassava’s shares dropped to $28.37 in extended-hours trading. It had closed at $31.87 during regular hours on Thursday.The SEC said Cassava will pay $40 million to settle the civil charges, while Remi Barbier, the company’s founder and former CEO, and Lindsay (NYSE:LNN) Burns, its former senior vice president of neuroscience, will pay $175,000 and $85,000, respectively, to settle the charges.Hoau-Yan Wang, a City University of New York Medical School professor and a consultant for Cassava who helped to develop the Alzheimer’s drug, was also charged by the SEC for manipulating the trial results.The SEC said Cassava misled investors by saying its Alzheimer’s drug “significantly improved patient cognition.” It failed to disclose that a full set of patient data actually showed “no measurable cognitive improvement in the patients’ episodic memory.” The company also failed to disclose Wang’s role in the clinical trial and his personal, financial, and professional interests in the drug’s success, the SEC said, adding he agreed to pay a $50,000 penalty.Cassava said in a statement that it cooperated fully with the SEC’s investigation and has implemented remedial measures. It also said it does not currently anticipate criminal charges from the Department of Justice. More

  • in

    Fed’s Cook says she ‘wholeheartedly’ supported half-point rate cut

    “I whole heartedly supported the decision,” Cook said in remarks prepared for delivery to The Ohio State University. “That decision reflected growing confidence that, with an appropriate recalibration of our policy stance, the solid labor market can be maintained in a context of moderate economic growth and inflation continuing to move sustainably down to our target.”Cook voted with the 11-1 majority at the Fed to reduce the policy rate by a half of a percentage point on Sept 18. Her prepared remarks, mostly about the impact of artificial intelligence on productivity and jobs, did not touch on her views about how much more or how quickly the Fed should cut rates from here. “In thinking about the path of policy moving forward, I will be looking carefully at incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks,” she said, using the same language the Fed did in its statement announcing the rate cut. The U.S. labor market remains “solid,” she said, but has cooled noticeably this year, with the unemployment rate rising to 4.2% from a low of 3.4%. “As labor demand and supply are now more evenly balanced, it may become more difficult for some individuals to find employment,” she said, noting that less-educated and minority workers tend to suffer more from weakening economic conditions. Meanwhile, she said, inflation pressures have eased, running 2.5% in the 12 months through July. That’s “notably closer” to the Fed’s 2% goal than it was just a year ago, she said.”The return to balance in the labor market between supply and demand, as well as the ongoing return toward our inflation target, reflects the normalization of the economy after the dislocations of the pandemic,” she said. “This normalization, particularly of inflation, is quite welcome, as a balance between supply and demand is essential for sustaining a prolonged period of labor-market strength.” More

  • in

    Morning Bid: Roaring Chinese stocks set for best week in a decade

    (Reuters) – A look at the day ahead in Asian markets.Will this week be Chinese President Xi Jinping’s equivalent of Mario Draghi’s famous “whatever it takes” moment?Only time will tell if China’s volley of monetary, liquidity and fiscal stimulus shots this week sparks a sustainable economic recovery, but the rally ripping through Chinese stocks suggests investors are willing to give Beijing the benefit of the doubt.At the very least, downside risks to growth and inflation have been pared back. Remove the near-term pessimism, and the outlook is suddenly a lot brighter, regardless of the underlying fundamental and structural challenges China’s economy faces.Couple that with a U.S. economy still seemingly on track for a ‘soft landing’ and a central bank determined to get ahead of the curve to deliver that outcome, the global picture is a lot brighter too. Risk assets around the world are responding accordingly. The MSCI World and S&P 500 both hit new highs on Thursday. In Asia, Shanghai’s blue chip equity index is up 10.8% so far this week, which would be its biggest weekly rise since December, 2014. The broader Shanghai composite index is up 9.7%. A close at that level on Friday would mark its best week since November, 2008.Hong Kong’s benchmark Hang Seng index’s 4% rally on Thursday brings its weekly gains to 9%, the most in 13 years. An index of mainland Chinese property stocks, meanwhile, leapt 16%.The main potential brake on this momentum on Friday will be a wave of profit-taking ahead of the weekend, especially as it is coming up to the end of the quarter, and Chinese markets will be closed Oct. 1-7 for the Golden Week holiday.While the euphoria and relief are understandable given how beaten down sentiment and asset prices were, a sense of caution is warranted. Although Draghi’s “whatever it takes” commitment in 2012 to save the euro greatly reduced the risk of financial and political catastrophe – bond yield spreads have been lower ever since – the actual policies behind it didn’t fundamentally solve the euro zone’s severe economic problems. Similarly, Beijing’s measures this week won’t fully solve China’s property bust, banish the threat of deflation, or address its long-term demographic challenges. But that’s for another day. Or year. The main Asian economic indicator on deck on Friday is Tokyo consumer price inflation for September, which is expected to show a fairly sharp slowdown in the annual core rate to 2.0% from 2.4%. Minutes from the Bank of Japan’s July meeting on Thursday showed that policymakers were divided on how quickly interest rates should be raised again, highlighting uncertainty on the timing of the next increase in borrowing costs.Here are key developments that could provide more direction to Asian markets on Friday:- Tokyo inflation (September)- Japan leading indicators (July)- German unemployment (September) More

  • in

    Fitch says Brazil’s fiscal challenges persist and will intensify next year

    Fitch said in a report that Brazil’s strong recent economic performance may be partially driven by the government’s relaxed fiscal stance. If fiscal performance was weak when economic growth was strong, it could deteriorate further in an unexpected slowdown, the ratings agency said.”Uncertain consolidation prospects are therefore a key macroeconomic vulnerability constraining Brazil’s ‘BB’/Stable sovereign rating,” it added. All three major ratings agencies have either upgraded Brazil’s rating or improved its outlook since last year, when President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva’s current term started. Still, Latin America’s largest economy remains two notches away from regaining its investment grade rating lost in 2015 amid a sharp drop in commodity prices and loosening of fiscal policies.This week, Lula met representatives from Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s (NYSE:MCO) in New York. He said on Wednesday in a press conference that it was important for the agencies to hear directly from him about Brazil’s situation.In the Thursday report, Fitch said some of the government’s efforts to raise revenues were “improvisational measures” that showed a commitment to fiscal targets but did not offer structural fiscal improvements. It forecast the government would meet its fiscal target of zeroing out the primary deficit this year, with a tolerance margin of 0.25% of gross domestic product and allowances for extraordinary spending that bypasses the official goal. However, it revised Brazil’s primary deficit to 1% of GDP next year, up from the previous estimate of 0.7%.Fitch also noted the country’s gross debt-to-GDP ratio is expected to rise to 77.8% this year, up from 74.4% last year, and reach 83.9% by 2026, the final year of Lula’s term.”This is faster than previously forecast, widening the gap to the ‘BB’ category median of 55%,” it said. More

  • in

    As Strike Looms, Port Operators Ask Regulator to Force Dockworkers to Negotiate

    The group that represents port terminal operators said the International Longshoremen’s Association was refusing to negotiate a new contract before a Monday deadline.Days ahead of a possible strike by longshoremen on the East and Gulf Coasts, port employers said on Thursday that they were asking a federal labor regulator to force the dockworkers’ union to resume negotiating a new contract.The United States Maritime Alliance, which is made up of port terminal operators, said it had filed an “unfair labor practice” complaint at the National Labor Relations Board after, it said, the International Longshoremen’s Association repeatedly refused to negotiate. The alliance said it wanted the labor board to rule that the union must negotiate with the employers.In a statement on Thursday, Jim McNamara, an I.L.A. spokesman, called the charge a “publicity stunt” that illustrated that the port employers were “poor negotiating partners.”Last week, the union said the two sides had “communicated multiple times in recent weeks,” and it contended that a stalemate existed because the Maritime Alliance was offering “an unacceptable wage increase.”A strike could begin on Tuesday, after the current labor contract expires on Monday. The I.L.A. broke off talks in June, contending that it had discovered that an employer was using labor-saving technology at the port in Mobile, Ala., that it claimed was unauthorized under the current contract.A strike would close down nearly all activity at ports from Maine to Texas — including at the Port of New York and New Jersey, the third busiest in the country. Analysts say even a short walkout could deal a blow to the economy. Fearing a strike, importers have been bringing in goods before next week and diverting some shipments to West Coast ports.Officials in the Biden administration have said President Biden is not planning to force dockworkers back to work, which the 1947 Taft-Hartley Act authorizes him to do. But economists said Mr. Biden might well end up invoking the act if a strike dragged on.Under the expiring contract, longshoremen earn $39 an hour. A person familiar with the negotiations said the union was asking for a $5-an-hour raise in each year of the new contract, which would last for six years. The person said employers were offering annual raises of $2.50 an hour.The Maritime Alliance said Monday that it had been contacted by the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, a government agency that helps management and unions negotiate labor contracts.Federal labor law says it is unlawful for a labor organization to refuse to negotiate on behalf of its members. More

  • in

    Trump’s Plans Could Spur Inflation While Slowing Growth, Study Finds

    A nonpartisan economic analysis warned that deporting migrants and increasing tariffs would damage the U.S. economy.Former President Donald J. Trump’s proposals to deport millions of migrants and impose new tariffs on imports from around the world would slash U.S. economic growth and employment and cause inflation to rebound sharply, according to a new analysis published on Thursday by the nonpartisan Peterson Institute for International Economics.That analysis also assumed that Mr. Trump would try to encroach on the independence of the Federal Reserve. He has not floated such a proposal but has suggested that presidents should have input into the central bank’s policies and in the past tried to publicly push the Fed to lower interest rates.The assessment of Mr. Trump’s policies was published days after the Republican presidential candidate pitched his plan to create a manufacturing “renaissance” in America by cutting corporate taxes and regulations and increasing tariffs by as much as 200 percent. Economists have been skeptical about the viability of many of Mr. Trump’s proposals, and some of them could be difficult to enact. But the new report argued that if taken together, the policies would inflict significant damage on the U.S. economy.“While Trump promises to ‘make the foreigners pay,’ our analysis shows his policies will end up making Americans pay the most,” Warwick J. McKibbin, Megan Hogan and Marcus Noland wrote in their report.The study from the Peterson Institute, which tends to favor free trade, examined the effects of three prominent parts of Mr. Trump’s agenda: deporting 8.3 million unauthorized migrants, levying 10 percent tariffs on all imports and 60 percent tariffs on imports from China, and eroding the Federal Reserve’s independence by allowing the president to influence interest rate policy.The study suggested that Mr. Trump wanted to weaken the Fed’s independence, citing a Wall Street Journal article that said his allies were drawing up a plan to blunt the central bank’s ability to freely set interest rates. It also noted that Mr. Trump has said he believes presidents should have a “say” on interest rate policy.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More