Economy

More stories

  • 138 Shares169 Views

    in Economy

    FirstFT: Trump picks Pam Bondi as US attorney-general after Gaetz withdraws

    by

    $75 per monthComplete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders. Pay a year upfront and save 20%.What’s included Global news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts20 monthly gift articles to shareLex: FT’s flagship investment column15+ Premium newsletters by leading expertsFT Digital Edition: our digitised print edition More

  • 100 Shares109 Views

    in Economy

    Why Trump Allies Say Immigration Hurts American Workers

    by

    JD Vance and others on the “new right” say limiting immigration will raise wages and give jobs to sidelined Americans. Many studies suggest otherwise.As President-elect Donald J. Trump’s second administration takes shape, his plans for a signature campaign promise are becoming clear: mass deportations of undocumented immigrants, including new detention centers, workplace raids and possibly the mobilization of the military to aid in expulsions.Most economists are skeptical that this project will improve opportunities for working-class Americans. Mr. Trump and his allies don’t typically argue for purging undocumented immigrants on economic grounds; the case is more often about crimes committed by migrants, or simply a need to enforce the law.But there is an intellectual movement behind immigration restriction that seeks to reshape the relationship between employers and their sources of labor. According to this rising conservative faction, most closely identified with Vice President-elect JD Vance, cutting off the supply of vulnerable foreigners will force employers to seek out U.S.-born workers.“We cannot have an entire American business community that is giving up on American workers and then importing millions of illegal laborers,” Mr. Vance said in an interview with The New York Times in October, adding, “It’s one of the biggest reasons why we have millions of people who’ve dropped out of the labor force.”Mr. Vance is correct that the share of men in their prime working years who are in the labor force — that is, either working or looking for work — has declined in recent decades, sliding during recessions and never totally recovering. (Women in that age group, 25 to 54 years old, are working at the highest levels on record.)It seems like a simple equation: When fewer workers are available, employers have to try harder to compete for them. Certainly that dynamic played a role in the swift wage growth early in the pandemic, when people willing to do in-person jobs — waiters or nurses, for example — were in especially short supply.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • 150 Shares99 Views

    in Economy

    Logging Is the Deadliest Job, but Still an Oregon Way of Life

    by

    In southwestern Oregon, semi trucks loaded with logs snake along roads through dark, lush forests of Douglas fir. The logging industry has shaped and sustained families here for generations.A steady demand for lumber and a lack of other well-paying jobs in rural parts of the state have made logging one of the most promising career paths.It also comes with grave risk.A glossary of logging terms includes an entry for heavy broken branches that can fall without warning: widowmakers.Inside the Deadliest Job in AmericaMostly employed in densely forested pockets of the Pacific Northwest and the South, loggers have the highest rate of fatal on-the-job injuries of any civilian occupation in the nation, outpacing roofers, hunters and underground mining machine operators.About 100 of every 100,000 logging workers die from work injuries, compared with four per 100,000 for all workers, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.Logs stacked for shipment at a port in North Bend, Ore.“There is a mix of physical factors — heavy equipment and, of course, the massive trees,” said Marissa Baker, a professor of occupational health at the University of Washington who has researched the logging industry. “Couple that with steep terrain and unforgiving weather and the rural aspect of the work, and it leads to great danger.”In the most rural stretches of Oregon, where swaths have been scarred by the clear-cutting of trees, many workers decide the risk is worth it. Most loggers here earn around $29 an hour. And average timber industry wages are 17 percent higher than local private-sector wages, according to a recent report from the Oregon Department of Administrative Services.Logging operates mostly year round, with workers usually bouncing among companies — sometimes called outfits — where pay can vary according to the specific job that needs to be done. But the industry has declined steeply since the 1990s, partly because of competition from other countries, including Brazil and Canada, and years of legal battles as conservationists seek to limit logging in old-growth forests.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • 100 Shares109 Views

    in Economy

    Britain’s household energy bills to rise from January

    by

    $75 per monthComplete digital access to quality FT journalism with expert analysis from industry leaders. Pay a year upfront and save 20%.What’s included Global news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts20 monthly gift articles to shareLex: FT’s flagship investment column15+ Premium newsletters by leading expertsFT Digital Edition: our digitised print edition More

  • 138 Shares189 Views

    in Economy

    China ‘willing’ to engage in Trump dialogue as it backs exporters

    by

    Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for freeYour guide to what the 2024 US election means for Washington and the worldChina is willing to engage in “positive dialogue” on trade with the US under a Donald Trump administration, senior trade officials said, a day after Beijing introduced a swath of measures to fortify its exporters ahead of anticipated higher tariffs imposed from Washington.At a press briefing on Friday, officials said Beijing would remain “steadfast” in resisting protectionist measures. They also pledged to maintain a stable exchange rate despite expectations that Trump’s policies, which include imposing 60 per cent tariffs on Chinese goods, could lead to a stronger dollar.“China and the United States share strong economic complementarities . . . China is willing to engage in positive dialogue with the US,” Wang Shouwen, international trade representative and vice-minister of commerce, said when asked about the expected Trump tariffs. “At the same time, it remains steadfast in safeguarding its sovereignty, security and development.” His comments came as Beijing on Thursday announced policies to support its exporters ahead of the start of the Trump administration in January, whose early cabinet appointments indicate it will be particularly hawkish on trade with China.The commerce ministry pledged to guide Chinese banks in channelling more credit to the export sector and help companies with foreign exchange hedging. In addition, it would “promote the development of cross-border ecommerce” and encourage agricultural exports, helping companies to “actively respond to unreasonable foreign trade restrictions”.As part of the measures, China would also “attract and facilitate cross-border exchanges of business personnel” through measures such as visa-free travel.China relies heavily on manufacturing investment and exports to boost an economy that is suffering from weak domestic demand following a prolonged property downturn. The country’s surging exports, which in dollar terms rose 12.7 per cent year on year in October, have ratcheted up tensions with trading partners from the US and the EU to developing countries. Brussels accuses Beijing of failing to do enough to stimulate domestic demand and of not removing barriers for foreign companies operating in China or exporting to the Chinese market. China’s imports declined 2.3 per cent year on year in October.Wang said China’s economy had “already demonstrated remarkable resilience” and that the previous round of tariffs initiated by the US had mainly been borne by American consumers.Some economists have speculated that China could counter Trump tariffs by allowing a depreciation of the renminbi, which would make Chinese goods more competitive in foreign exchange terms. If Trump’s tariffs and tax cuts prove to be inflationary, driving up the prices of goods in the US, that could increase the interest rate differential with China and also drive a weakening of the renminbi, they say. But Liu Ye, director of the international department of the People’s Bank of China, said at Friday’s briefing that the central bank would ensure “the renminbi exchange rate remains fundamentally stable at a reasonable and balanced level”.China’s President Xi Jinping has called for a stable exchange rate as the world’s largest exporter and manufacturer seeks to portray itself as a reliable trading partner. More

  • 113 Shares129 Views

    in Economy

    The UK’s high-wire act between the US and Europe

    by

    One of the promised advantages of leaving the EU was that it would allow Britain to forge its own path in the world. With the re-election of Donald Trump, charting an independent route forward became more complicated.Brexit has already left the UK adrift between American and EU trade and regulatory regimes — reluctant to tack too far one way or the other. Now the government is bracing itself for stark strategic choices on pivotal issues ranging from carbon pricing and AI regulation to trade tariffs when the president-elect enters the Oval Office in January.Ministers and officials wonder whether Trump’s return could force the UK to make a decision — either to cleave to Washington or to veer towards Brussels — or whether Britain can still attempt to chart a middle path on a range of policy flashpoints.Lord Peter Mandelson, the former Labour cabinet minister and EU trade commissioner — and a leading candidate to become the next UK ambassador to Washington — has said that the UK must look to “have our cake and eat it” when triangulating with Trump. That will mean seeking side deals with Washington in areas like digital trade and defence while continuing Labour’s current “reset” with trade and security ties in Europe. Others are less optimistic. Walking a line between being both pro-European and Atlanticist will be difficult when it comes down to matters of substance, warns Charles Grant, the director of the Centre for European Reform in London.Some content could not load. Check your internet connection or browser settings.“It seems clear that the UK government will look to walk a tightrope with the Americans; collaborating with the US on defence and lining up with the EU on trade and climate issues,” he says.But, he adds, “the danger is we don’t keep anyone happy: we do just enough with the US to create doubts in European minds that we’re not trustworthy.”Other trade experts and longtime Brussels watchers agree that the result of the US election has the potential to significantly complicate the UK prime minister’s efforts to reset relations with Brussels on a number of commerce and trade issues.Trump will be returning to the White House in the new year just as the British government is seeking to finalise its pitch to the EU on how to deepen ties on trade, energy co-operation and security matters ahead of a planned EU-UK summit in the early spring.“The big question is whether any kind of tariff exemptions or deal with the Trump administration requires a radically different approach to either regulation or trade — if the inconsistencies with the EU became too big, then it would make it difficult to get closer to the EU,” says Olivia O’Sullivan, director of the UK in the World programme at think-tank Chatham House.It is not just about trade or defence: the UK could also find itself caught between Europe and the US over how to deal with China. The government will also have to navigate complex domestic political arguments about its approach that will probably revive many of the issues around the Brexit referendum.Experts caution that there are downsides to pivoting in either direction — but also in failing to make a choice at all. As Kim Darroch, former UK ambassador to the US, warns: “If you choose to leave the world’s biggest trading bloc and drift gently around in the Atlantic — and are not sure whether you want to join an American regulatory regime for trade or the EU one — it’s going to leave you looking very isolated.”The success or failure of London’s attempts to thread the needle with Washington will depend in large part on how hard Trump’s new administration pushes for Starmer’s government to choose between dual trade regimes, according to trade experts.John Alty, the former director-general of trade policy at the UK Department for International Trade during the last Trump presidency, says that Britain’s current trade agreement with the EU in theory left the country free to do side-deals with the US without affecting UK-EU trade.The UK government would be looking to put together a package of “common interests” based around digital trade and supply-chain resilience in critical minerals. At the same time, London will be arguing to Washington that imposing economically damaging tariffs is self-defeating when it is also demanding Europe finds more money to pay for its own for defence. US demands could include some carve-out for US exporters from a UK carbon border tax on imported goods which is due to be introduced in 2027, or politically more contentious “asks”, such as requesting that the UK admit US food products such as chlorine-washed chicken or hormone-raised beef as part of an offer for a full US-UK free trade agreement.A container ship in the UK port of Felixstowe. Some UK industries could be badly affected by heavy tariffs, in particular pharmaceuticals and automotive, which are leading exporters to the US More

  • 163 Shares159 Views

    in Economy

    Singapore Q3 GDP up 5.4% y/y, higher than advance estimate; 2024 forecast upgraded

    by

    The growth was higher than a median forecast of 4.6% in a Reuters poll of economists, and annual growth of 3.0% in the second quarter.On a quarter-on-quarter, seasonally adjusted basis, GDP expanded 3.2% in the July to September period, higher than both the advance estimate of 2.1% and the June quarter growth of 0.5%.The trade ministry upgraded its GDP growth forecast for 2024 to “around 3.5%” from a previous range of 2.0% to 3.0%. The ministry said it expects growth of 1.0% to 3.0% in 2025. The MAS left monetary policy settings unchanged last month in its last review of the year as inflation pressures continued to moderate and growth prospects improved.The MAS has said core inflation should ease to around 2% by the end of this year. Annual inflation was 2.8% in September. More