More stories

  • in

    Fed faces hefty data, political calendar before next policy meeting

    (Reuters) – The nine days until Federal Reserve officials sit down to decide what to do next with interest rates features a veritable murderers’ row of events to shape their move – everything from key employment and inflation data to a closely fought U.S. presidential election.Even so, it’s not clear what among that mix might steer the U.S. central bank from what is seen widely as its most likely next decision: A second in a series of interest rate cuts aimed at keeping the U.S. labor market healthy and the economy out of recession as inflation cools.The Fed’s initial rate cut in September brought the policy rate down by a half of a percentage point to the 4.75%-5.00% range, a decisive turn after more than two years of battling decades-high inflation and one motivated by what had appeared to be signs of a weakening labor market over the summer.Since then, however, the data has generally come in stronger than expected, with consumer spending and job creation looking particularly robust, and price pressures picking up slightly. Citigroup’s U.S. Economic Surprise Index is at a six-month high.But rather than second-guessing their decision to ease policy, nearly all Fed officials who have spoken publicly since the Sept. 18 rate cut have said they are pleased with an unemployment rate at 4.1% and inflation that is now much closer to the central bank’s 2% goal than before, and even the most hawkish among them have signaled support for further rate cuts to keep it that way.”So far I haven’t seen any information that would suggest we wouldn’t continue to reduce the interest rate,” San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly said last week. Noting that policy is “very tight” for an economy where inflation is easing, she said, “I don’t want to see the labor market slow further.”Daly was one of a few policymakers who signaled they could be open to a rate-cutting pause at an upcoming meeting. But none have pushed for skipping a move in November.DEBATE AND DATA DELUGEThat’s not to say there won’t be a debate or that it won’t be, as September’s decision was, a close call for many. And yet all Fed policymakers making substantive comments on the policy outlook since the last meeting have expressed comfort with additional rate cuts.Updated projections published at the meeting last month show each of them believe there is at least a full percentage point of rate cuts to go before the policy rate gets to its longer-term “neutral” level. The Summary of Economic Projections, or SEP, shows a majority believe there’s at least two full percentage points of room for cuts. “While much attention is given to the size of cuts over the next meeting or two, I think the larger message of the SEP is that there is a considerable extent of policy restrictiveness to remove, and if the economy continues in its current sweet spot, this will happen gradually,” Fed Governor Christopher Waller said earlier this month.Fed policymakers this week will get the latest reading of their preferred inflation gauge, which is expected to show underlying price pressures remain sticky while year-over-year headline inflation ticks down to 2.1%. Also on the docket is a first look at third-quarter economic growth, expected to come in at a strong 3% annual rate, and an updated estimate of how many job openings there are for every job seeker, a favorite labor-market metric for Fed Chair Jerome Powell that has been showing gradual cooling.The U.S. government also is due to release the October jobs report, which is expected to show job growth slowed, though the underlying trend could be hard to parse since recent hurricanes and an ongoing strike at Boeing (NYSE:BA) could reduce the month’s payrolls by as much as 100,000 jobs and push up the jobless rate.”Fed officials have flagged the fact that the data is going to be messy in the months ahead for a variety of temporary factors,” Thomas Simons, a senior economist at Jefferies, wrote in a note. “We do not see any reason why the Fed would skip a rate cut at either of the two upcoming meetings this year.”Fed policymakers observe a communications blackout for the 10 days ahead of every scheduled policy meeting, so they have no chance to publicly guide expectations one way or another in the event of a data surprise during those periods. But, like Simons, most analysts have stuck to their calls for a quarter-percentage-point cut next month. Financial markets have firmed up bets on the same outcome.OUTLIERSThen comes Nov. 5, the day Americans go to the polls to elect a new president, members of Congress and countless other office-holders.With Fed officials convening the very next day, Macquarie strategist Thierry Wizman, for one, says a victory by Republican former President Donald Trump over Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris in the race for the White House could mean a Fed pause – not for any political reason, but because Wizman figures financial markets would react by pricing in sharply higher inflation expectations based on Trump’s calls for higher tariffs on imports, an immigration crackdown and lower taxes.Joseph Tracy, a distinguished fellow at Purdue University, says the Fed should go ahead with another half-percentage-point cut, arguing monetary policy rules call for getting rates more quickly within striking distance of their ultimate destination before making smaller adjustments to fine-tune the landing. Neither path looks likely. Despite their attention to policy rules, U.S. central bankers don’t hew to them too closely, preferring to use judgment and consensus in their decision-making process.And as for abandoning rate cuts after a hypothetical Trump election victory? Among the many other reasons not to do so, including overall anchored inflation expectations, the optics “are terrible,” Tim Duy, chief U.S. economist at SGH Macro Advisors, wrote in a note.Next month’s policy debate could set the stage for a pause in the easing cycle in December, particularly if inflation continues to edge up and the labor market remains strong. That’s a move that nearly half of Fed policymakers may have supported last month, according to the projections.But for now – barring anything extraordinary – the U.S. central bank looks headed toward further reductions in borrowing costs.”The Fed is on track for rate cuts in November and, we think, December as it recalibrates policy to a more neutral stance,” Duy wrote. More

  • in

    Swiss president says deal with EU possible this year despite immigration hurdle

    “We have already made very good progress in certain areas, particularly on institutional issues and state aid,” Viola Amherd told reporters in Bern. “In other areas, especially immigration, positions need to converge further.”Amherd has previously said that Switzerland is looking to wrap up a deal with the EU this year, when her one-year term also comes to an end. “Personally, I remain optimistic that we will manage,” she added.Previous attempts to reach a deal foundered over concerns about Swiss sovereignty. One of the remaining challenges is domestic opposition from the leading right-wing Swiss People’s Party (SVP), and Amherd admitted talks with them were “almost impossible”. “We have other possibilities inside Switzerland to guarantee that we don’t want to reduce salaries and that we don’t want immigration without control. I am persuaded we will find a solution,” she said. More

  • in

    Commercial real estate industry worries over higher taxes as election looms

    NEW YORK (Reuters) – The U.S. commercial real estate industry is pushing for tax relief and incentives championed by former Republican President Donald Trump to continue in the next administration, as the sector struggles with surging delinquencies, record vacancy rates, and elevated costs of financing.Commercial real estate is especially vulnerable to higher taxes because its high fixed costs make it less able to offset them, according to industry trade groups. They said they are particularly concerned about key tax breaks being retained or left unchallenged in the coming years. “‘Do no harm’ is the biggest thing with real estate organizations,” said David McCarthy, the managing director and head of legislative affairs at the Commercial Real Estate Finance Council, a nonpartisan trade group. “Given that the nature of real estate is not super liquid, anything that raises costs now would come at the worst possible time.”Key measures that the industry is concerned about preserving include pass-through deductions, like-kind exchanges and low capital gains taxes. Trump has endorsed making his tax cuts permanent although he has not been specific about these measures. Many of his 2017 tax cuts are set to expire next year. So far, campaign contributions from the finance, insurance and real estate sectors favor Trump, with $234.9 million donations to the former president versus the $117 million in giving to Vice President Kamala Harris, a Democrat, according to data from politics money tracker OpenSecrets.  Industry trade group the National Association of Realtors has also donated more to Republicans, with $5.2 million to the GOP versus $3.9 million to Democrats.”Regardless of who is in office in January, we will be dealing with the tax cuts … expiring at the end of 2025, and we want to keep those,” said NAR director of commercial and policy oversight Erin Stackley. The Harris and Trump campaigns did not respond to requests for comment.Among the real estate mega donors who have backed Trump are budget hotelier Robert Bigelow’s Bigelow Aerospace which donated $14.2 million to Trump’s Super PAC, the OpenSecrets data shows.Newmark Chairman Howard Lutnick’s investment firm, Cantor Fitzgerald, has given at least $6 million to the PAC. Lutnick co-chairs Trump’s transition team.Mega donors tied to real estate who back Harris include Simon Property Group (NYSE:SPG) heiress Deborah Simon, who has donated at least $1 million, and Worthe Real Estate Group head Jeff Worthe, who has also given at least $1 million, OpenSecrets shows.Bigelow, Lutnick and Simon declined to comment. Worthe said he supported being able to focus on “what’s good for business,” adding that he supported Harris because he wanted stability in Washington. TAX BREAKS While some see signs of a market bottom, others argue that the commercial real estate (CRE) industry needs time to recover from high interest rates and work-from-home trends. Next year, it will face $1 trillion wall of debt, a surge in office sector delinquencies on commercial mortgage-backed securities to 11% and record-high office vacancies in urban centers, according to ratings agency reports. Falling interest rates may offer scant relief.”Over the last 18 months … operating costs have … risen dramatically at the same time the availability of capital and credit have diminished,” said Jeff DeBoer, CEO of the Real Estate Roundtable, an invitation-only group whose members include Blackstone (NYSE:BX), Brookfield Property Partners (NASDAQ:BPY) and Starwood Capital Group. “All of that creates stress and challenges in the CRE marketplace.”  McCarthy said the industry specifically wants to see a reauthorization of key provisions included in Trump’s 2017 tax cuts, including the 199A deduction, also known as the qualified business income deduction. That is set to expire in 2025, according to nonpartisan policy research group the Brookings Institution. This allows owners of pass-through businesses and partnerships, including CRE owners, to deduct up to 20% of their business income from their taxable income. Harris has not explicitly said, in campaign speeches and filings, whether she will support the pass-through deduction, though in her campaign documents she does state she would roll back the 2017 Trump tax cuts for the richest Americans. Trump said in speeches, interviews and campaign documents that he would make tax cuts permanent, although it is not clear his specific views on 199A.   Another measure of concern to the industry is 1031 “like-kind” exchanges, which enable real estate investors to defer capital gains taxes by reinvesting proceeds of sales into new purchases. Harris supports limiting this for high earners, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Tax Foundation based on Harris’s endorsement of President Biden’s 2025 budget tax proposals. Trump has not made clear specific views on 1031. Capital gains tax rates are also of paramount concern.“When I talk to my members, the biggest concern they have is what’s going to happen to the capital gains tax rate,” said Aquiles F. Suarez, senior vice president for government affairs at NAIOP, the commercial real estate development association, whose members include top leaders from real estate firms such as JLL and CBRE. NAIOP says it advocates for industry interests rather than partisan politics. Harris has proposed increasing the top capital gains rate to 28% for households earning more than $1 million annually from the current rates, which range up to 20%. Higher capital gains tax rates can discourage investors from selling properties, reducing transactions.  Another key question for the industry is working out a solution for empty office buildings across the U.S. Adapting office towers into housing, a proposal that Harris has supported, is an idea that will only be realistic for about 10% of the U.S.’s office stock, industry trade groups say. Trump has not officially endorsed the idea of converting offices into housing. This is “the number one, two and three issue right now because it affects the entire real estate market,” said David A. Nasatir, Chairman of law firm Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel LLP. More

  • in

    German politicians should leave differences aside, DSGV president says

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Politicians within Germany’s three-way coalition government should put their differences aside to address the country’s stagnating growth, the president of the German Savings Banks Association (DSGV) told Reuters in an interview.The German economy contracted last year and the government foresees it will shrink again this year, while the International Monetary Fund last week also cut its forecasts for the country.”We are very worried about the economic situation in Germany,” DSGV President Ulrich Reuter said on the sidelines of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank annual meetings on Friday.”We need to free ourselves from bureaucratic hurdles and find a clear and future-oriented path for more competitiveness,” he said. “That must be our main focus. (Politicians) must leave everything else aside.”The three parties of the so-called “traffic light” coalition of the centre-left Social Democrats, the Greens and the FDP, which has ruled Europe’s largest economy since 2021, hold diverging views on how to spur growth. Chancellor Olaf Scholz from the SPD and Economy Minister Robert Habeck from the Greens have already laid out their economic plans.German Finance Minister Christian Lindner told Reuters in an interview on Friday that he is also working on his own proposals, which will be presented shortly. “The direction is right with all these proposals,” Reuter said. “You just have to make a package out of it. That’s what the economy will very much wish for: agree and move on.”Reuter’s association has a business relationship with three out of four companies in Germany, and plays a big role in the financing of the small and mid-sized companies known as Mittelstand that together provide 55% of Germany’s jobs. Germany is working on structural reforms to stimulate anaemic growth, which Reuter sees as “an important step”, but he called for further reforms ahead of the next election in September 2025. The economic downturn is taking its toll on the Mittelstand, with companies being very cautious in their demand for credit, holding back innovation and investment, he said.”The Mittelstand is still the backbone of the German economy, but the pressure is rising.” More

  • in

    Can Harris’s Economic Plans Sway Small Business Owners to Vote Democratic?

    Kamala Harris has leaned in with promises to aid start-ups, but proprietors are often more focused on taxes and regulations.Presidential campaigns often use the backdrop of small businesses — record stores, diners, machine shops — to emphasize their candidates’ authenticity and hometown values. But this election cycle has taken those businesses a bit more seriously.In speeches and ads, Vice President Kamala Harris has sought to infuse entrepreneurship into her brand — an avowed capitalist, but for the little guy. Her economic policy platform mentions “small business” 77 times, including a section aimed at addressing owners’ needs, such as easing licensing requirements and funneling more federal contracts their way.It’s not hard to see why a candidate might lean in on Main Street: Small businesses are collectively the most respected institution in American life, according to research from Gallup and Pew. Ms. Harris’s messaging might also help counter former President Donald J. Trump’s reputation as a successful business owner, which continues to bolster his economic credentials among voters despite his many bankruptcies and sometimes fraudulent practices.Ms. Harris’s focus on small business isn’t completely new. She also took on the issue as vice president, visiting businesses to hand out billions of dollars in loans funded by the American Rescue Plan Act. She often talks about her “second mother,” Regina Shelton — who ran a nursery school in Berkeley, Calif. — as a small-business owner and an integral part of the community.“Kamala’s economic plans are designed to help people like Mrs. Shelton, so that they have enough in the bank to start a business or pass something on to their kids,” said Felicia Wong, who runs Roosevelt Forward, a progressive advocacy group.Ms. Harris has sought to portray herself as an avowed capitalist, but for the little guy.Kenny Holston/The New York TimesWe are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    India’s economic growth to stay strong, but job creation fails to spark joy: Reuters poll

    BENGALURU (Reuters) – India’s economy will grow at a solid pace this fiscal year and next, according to a Reuters poll of economists, but they cautioned that key drivers such as job creation and household spending will only increase mildly over the next 12 months.While Asia’s third-largest economy clocked 8.2% growth last fiscal year – the most among major economies – fueled by years of government spending, it failed to create enough well paying jobs for millions entering the workforce every year.With private investment failing to pick up significantly in the last decade, millions of job seekers are pinning their hopes on getting a government job.Economists cite weak household spending and a lack of reforms from the government as factors dampening private sector investment confidence and job creation, suggesting the benefits are increasingly funneled to only a select few.India’s economic growth was expected to slow to 6.9% this fiscal year (FY), slightly lower than the International Monetary Fund (IMF) forecast of 7%, and decline to 6.7% next fiscal year and to 6.6% in FY 2026/27, according to a Reuters poll of 48 economists taken over Oct. 21-28.”For economic growth to take off, consumption … needs to see an upturn,” Aditya Vyas, chief economist at STCI Primary Dealer Limited, said in an email.”Deeper issues such as job creation, a strong increase in levels of private investment etc, need to be addressed … else, it will not go much above the average trend.”After growth picked up slightly to 6.8% last quarter from 6.7% in the April-June period, it was expected to rise to 7% this quarter and next, in line with the long-term growth trend.But most economists reckon the economy needs to consistently grow over 8% for a long period of time to create adequate jobs.When asked what will happen to job creation in India over the next 12 months, 15 of 28 respondents said it will increase mildly, while nine said it will remain the same.”With manufacturing struggling especially the MSMEs (Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises), we do not expect any major improvement in the employment scenario in India,” Kunal Kundu, India economist at Societe Generale (OTC:SCGLY), said by email.”A modest employment scenario, inadequate quality of job creation and still negative real wages suggest only modest growth in employment going forward. Consumption will likely continue to remain weak. This is a period of consumption normalisation as the phase of pent-up demand is over.”While consumer spending, which makes up 60% of the economy, has picked up recently, rising inflation is forcing millions of households to cut back on food and dip into their savings to stay afloat, suggesting consumption will slow over coming months.When asked what will happen to private consumption in India over the next 12 months, 19 of 28 respondents said it will increase mildly, while five said it will remain the same. “There will be some cyclical recovery on private consumption. However, a large part of this increase is likely to come from a recovery on the rural demand side, which so far has been muted and was a big drag on consumer demand,” said Sakshi Gupta, principal economist at HDFC Bank.”There is a very uncertain global environment that we are now moving into … that does bring an element of uncertainty as well as risk for domestic economic activity and job creation.”(Other stories from the October Reuters global economic poll) More

  • in

    Futures rise, tech earnings this week, oil slips – what’s moving markets

    1. Futures riseUS stock futures pointed higher on Monday, as investors looked ahead to quarterly earnings from megacap technology names later this week, geared up for a key employment report, and braced for upheaval around the upcoming knife-edge US election.By 04:30 ET (08:30 GMT), the Dow futures contract had added 178 points or 0.4%, S&P 500 futures had gained 30 points or 0.5%, and Nasdaq 100 futures had risen by 135 points or 0.7%.The benchmark S&P 500 has jumped by around 22% this year, sparking concerns over elevated valuations in US equity markets that could be vulnerable to short-term ructions. According to LSEG data cited by Reuters, the S&P 500’s price-to-earnings ratio — a gauge of earnings estimates for the next 12 months — stands at 21.8, close to the highest level in more than three years.Whether valuations will remain at these heights is a major question facing investors, particularly as they prepare for the confluence of several potentially market-moving events in the coming days.2. Tech earnings aheadThis week will see the release of quarterly returns from a string of tech industry titans, which could heavily influence the direction of markets.Although shares in industrial and financial firms have recently helped broaden out the gains in stocks, the biggest tech players have been the most powerful drivers of a push higher in markets to record levels. The so-called Magnificent Seven tech groups are tipped to account for almost all of the earnings growth from the S&P 500 in the third quarter, according to FactSet data cited by The Wall Street Journal.Meanwhile, commentary from these companies around artificial intelligence could sway how analysts are assessing a spike in investment in the nascent technology, with some strategists worrying that the heavy spending may not lead to immediate returns.Of the Magnificent Seven firms, Google-parent Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL), software giant Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), Instagram-owner Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META), iPhone-maker Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and e-commerce behemoth Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) are all due to report this week. Electric carmaker Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) posted better-than-expected earnings last week, while AI-darling Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) is set to unveil its latest figures on Nov. 20.3. McDonald’s says beef patties not the source of E. coli outbreakMcDonald’s said over the weekend that beef patties were not the source of an E. coli outbreak stemming from its Quarter Pounders burgers that killed one person and sickened almost 75 others across multiple US states.In a statement, the fast-food chain’s North America Chief Supply Chain Officer Cesar Piña noted the “issue appears to be contained to a particular ingredient and geography,” adding “we remain very confident that any contaminated product related to this outbreak has been removed from our supply chain and is out of all McDonald’s (NYSE:MCD) restaurants.”The Colorado Department of Agriculture also said subsamples from McDonald’s fresh and frozen beef patties had all tested negative for E. coli. Testing has been completed and no further samples are expected to received, the department said.McDonald’s is now set to resume distribution of fresh supplies for the Quarter Pounder, with the offering anticipated to be available once again in all restaurants in the coming week, the company said.Shares in the group slipped last week after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention flagged the health ramifications of the E. coli infections linked to the Quarter Pounder.4. Yen weakens as Japanese election dampens rate hike betsThe Japanese yen was one of the worst performing currencies in Asia on Monday, with its pair with the US dollar rising to its highest level since late-July.The yen was battered by local media reports showing a coalition led by Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic party did not win a majority in the parliamentary elections held on Sunday. The LDP will now have to seek coalitions with smaller regional parties to retain power — a scenario that presents a more fractured political outlook for Japan.Traders were betting that the increased political uncertainty will keep the Bank of Japan from hiking interest rates further, weighing on the yen.5. Oil dipsOil prices fell sharply Monday after Israel’s retaliatory strike on Iran over the weekend avoided Tehran’s oil and nuclear facilities, easing geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.By 04:31 ET, the Brent contract dropped 4.5% to $72.23 per barrel, while U.S. crude futures (WTI) traded 4.8% lower at $68.34 per barrel.Traders had feared that any attacks on Iran’s oil and nuclear infrastructure would mark a dire escalation in the conflict, potentially disrupting oil supplies from the crude-rich region. Iran downplayed the impact of the attack, but still threatened retaliation.The strike caused some investors to price out a risk premium from crude prices, putting the focus squarely back on demand, which is expected to weaken in the coming months.(Reuters contributed reporting.) More

  • in

    Japan’s political shakeup complicates BOJ, fiscal policy outlook

    TOKYO (Reuters) – The loss of Japan’s ruling bloc’s parliamentary majority has heightened prospects that a new government will need to ramp up spending and of potential complications for further central bank interest rates hikes.Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and its longtime partner Komeito failed to retain a majority in lower house elections on the weekend, casting doubts over how long the 67-year-old premier can keep his job.”Regardless of who will be in power, the new government will be forced to take expansionary fiscal and monetary policies to avoid inflicting burdens on voters,” said Saisuke Sakai, senior economist at Mizuho Research and Technologies.To stay firmly in power, the LDP, which has governed Japan for almost all its post-war history, will likely need to court smaller opposition parties, such as the Democratic Party for the People (DPP) and Japan Innovation Party (JIP), as coalition partners or at least for policy-based alliances.Both smaller parties have ruled out forming a coalition with the LDP but said they are open to some policy cooperation.In their election campaigns, both the DPP and JIP pledged to lower consumption tax from 10%. DPP’s proposals also included cutting power utility bills and tax for lower-income earners.While Ishiba has already proposed a supplementary budget that exceeds last year’s 13 trillion yen ($85 billion), he could face pressure for a package that exceeds 20 trillion yen, Sakai said.’POLITICAL NOISE’The heightened political turmoil could make it harder for the Bank of Japan in its bid to wean the economy off decades of monetary stimulus, analysts say.The central bank ended negative interest rates in March and raised short-term rates to 0.25% in July on the view Japan was making progress towards durably achieving its 2% inflation target.BOJ Governor Kazuo Ueda has vowed to continue lifting rates and economists don’t see any major immediate change to the broader policy direction.However, a markedly new parliamentary makeup could deprive the BOJ of the political stability it needs to steer a smooth lift-off from near-zero interest rates, analysts say.”The bar is higher for the BOJ to raise interest rates again by the end of this year amid this political noise,” said Masahiko Loo, senior fixed income strategist at State Street (NYSE:STT) Global Advisors.DPP leader Yuichiro Tamaki has criticised the BOJ for raising rates prematurely.JIP proposes legislative changes that would mandate the central bank with objectives beyond just price stability, such as sustained nominal economic growth rate and maximization of employment.Conversely, the biggest opposition, Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, has called for BOJ’s inflation target to be lowered to one “exceeding zero” from 2% currently, which would reduce the threshold for more rate hikes.At the same time, a weak yen could become a headache for Japanese policymakers by boosting the cost of imported raw materials, pushing up inflation and hurting consumption.If the yen weakens toward 160 per dollar, the BOJ “would be pressured to raise rates again to stem the weakness of the Japanese currency,” said Takeshi Minami, chief economist at Norinchukin Research Institute.The need for another rate hike could also grow if a yen downturn is accelerated by a Donald Trump victory in the U.S. presidential election on Nov. 5, he added.Trump’s tariff and stricter immigration policies are seen as inflationary, which would diminish the need for U.S. rate cuts, in turn pushing the dollar up against the yen.”The visibility has gone down significantly for the BOJ,” Minami said.($1 = 153.5700 yen) More