More stories

  • in

    Australian lender ANZ’s annual profit misses expectations on ‘intense’ competition

    (Reuters) -Australian lender ANZ Group reported lower-than-expected annual cash earnings and slashed its dividend on Friday as a challenging period of intense deposit and lending competition and high costs crimped its margins.”Competition in the (core banking) sector has continued to be intense, particularly in home lending and deposits,” ANZ Chief Executive Shayne Elliott said in a statement.Australian banks have been struggling to grow their profits because of stubbornly high expenses and a fierce price war between lenders as customers look for better deals on loans and their deposits.The country’s fourth-largest lender by market value reported a cash profit of A$6.73 billion ($4.49 billion) for the year ended Sept. 30, missing the Visible Alpha consensus of A$6.82 billion and below last year’s A$7.41 billion.Operating income slipped marginally to A$20.81 billion but beat the consensus view of A$20.77 billion.”Overall a soft result that missed market expectations, despite the lower quality beat to markets revenues,” Citi analysts said.The lender’s shares were trading 1.1% lower at A$31.37 as of 2327 GMT, as against the S&P/ASX200 benchmark index’s 0.8% gain.ANZ proposed a final dividend of 83 Australian cents per share, below 94 Australian cents a share last year. It was, however, in line with market expectations.The bank’s net interest margin, a key measure of profitability, fell 13 basis points from last year to 1.57%. Its common equity tier 1 ratio, a measure of spare cash, slipped more than a percentage point to 12.2% as of the end of the financial year.”Higher interest rates are impacting customers and we saw an increase in those requiring hardship support,” Elliott said, referring to hardship packages that banks offer to borrowers in difficult circumstances to ease their repayment obligations.Loan payments overdue for more than 90 days but not yet impaired grew by 47% to A$4.17 billion. Customer deposits were up 11% to A$715.21 billion, although the bank’s institutional division saw a marginal drop in its deposits.Earlier in the week, larger rivals Westpac and National Australia Bank (OTC:NABZY) also reported modest declines in their annual cash profits due to fierce competition as well as a slight uptick in late loan payments.($1 = 1.4972 Australian dollars) More

  • in

    Trump victory heightens risks for BOJ as yen renews slide

    TOKYO (Reuters) -A dollar rally triggered by Republican Donald Trump’s victory in the U.S. presidential election could heighten pressure on the Bank of Japan to raise interest rates as soon as December to prevent the yen from sliding back toward three-decade lows.Trump’s victory in the U.S. presidential election unleashed sharp dollar gains, as expectations of tax cuts and tariffs on imports drove optimism about economic growth while fueling worries about inflation.The greenback’s strength briefly pushed the yen to a three-month low of 154.71 on Thursday, well off a high of 140.62 hit in mid-September.While a weak yen gives exports a boost, it has become a headache for Japanese policymakers by pushing up fuel and food import costs and in turn hurting consumption.Rising inflation was widely seen as one of the factors behind the massive voter swing against the ruling coalition at last month’s general election.Japan’s top currency diplomat Atsushi Mimura escalated his warning against sharp yen falls on Thursday, saying authorities were ready to act against “excessive” currency moves.One nightmare scenario for policymakers would be a renewed plunge in the yen towards the three-decade trough near 162 to the dollar hit in July – a move that prodded the BOJ to raise interest rates to 0.25% on July 31.Back then, the tumbling yen led to calls from ruling party lawmakers for the BOJ to hike rates, or send clearer signs of its intention to push up borrowing costs.Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba stunned markets on Oct. 2 by saying the economy was not ready for further rate hikes, though he later toned down his message to say he would not intervene in BOJ policy.”Politicians don’t want a weak yen, so even those who have urged the BOJ to be cautious about raising rates could nod to hikes if yen falls accelerate,” said Tsuyoshi Ueno, senior economist at NLI Research Institute. “In that sense, the weak yen could prod the BOJ into steady rate hikes.”HAND-IN-HANDThe BOJ exited a decade-long radical stimulus in March and raised short-term interest rates to 0.25% in July on the view Japan was making progress towards sustainably achieving its 2% inflation target.While many analysts expect the BOJ to hike rates again by March, they are divided on whether it would act in December – or wait until January or March to gauge more data.The BOJ kept interest rates steady last month but removed language warning of the need to focus on external risks, leaving open the chance of a near-term hike.Renewed yen falls may heighten the chance of the BOJ acting in December, given the BOJ’s sensitivity to the currency’s weakness that pushes up import costs, analysts say.Expectations of a near-term rate hike by the BOJ, coupled with rising U.S. Treasury yields, pushed the benchmark 10-year Japanese government bond (JGB) yield above 1% for the first time in more than three months on Thursday.”The BOJ hasn’t said so clearly but its rate hike in July was likely driven in part by its concern over excessive yen falls,” said Shinichiro Kobayashi, principal economist at Mitsubishi UFJ (NYSE:MUFG) Research and Consulting.”If the yen heads toward 160 to the dollar again, the chance of a rate hike by year-end will increase,” he said.Tomoyuki Ota, chief economist at Mizuho (NYSE:MFG) Research & Technologies, also sees 160-to-the-dollar as authorities’ line in the sand that heightens the chance of a BOJ rate hike – and currency intervention by the government to prop up the yen.In the previous battle with yen falls, the government and the BOJ appeared to work hand-in-hand.Japanese authorities spent 5.53 trillion yen ($35.8 billion) intervening in the foreign exchange market in July to pull the yen off 38-year lows near 162 to the dollar. That month, the BOJ hiked rates and stressed its resolve to keep pushing up borrowing costs.BOJ Governor Kazuo Ueda’s hawkish hints of near-term rate hikes at last month’s policy meeting pushed the dollar down toward 150 yen.”There’s no doubt the market’s direction is towards a weaker yen. If yen falls accelerate, the chance of a December rate hike will increase,” said Ota of Mizuho Research. “The government and the BOJ will likely act swiftly including through currency intervention.”($1 = 154.4400 yen) More

  • in

    Fed’s Powell flags careful, patient approach after rate cut

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Federal Reserve cut interest rates by a quarter of a percentage point on Thursday as its policymakers began taking stock of what could become a more complex economic landscape when President-elect Donald Trump takes office next year.Fed Chair Jerome Powell said the results of Tuesday’s presidential election, which paved the way for a U.S. chief executive who has pledged widespread deportation of immigrants, broad-based tariffs, and tax cuts, would have no “near-term” impact on U.S. monetary policy.Powell said the Fed will continue assessing data to determine the “pace and destination” of interest rates as officials reset currently tight monetary policy to account for inflation that has slowed markedly in the past year and is nearing the U.S. central bank’s 2% target.But as the new administration’s proposals take shape, the Fed chief said the central bank would begin estimating the impact on its twin goals of stable inflation and maximum employment.”It’s a process that takes some time,” said Powell, who spoke in a press conference following the Fed’s decision to reduce its benchmark overnight interest rate to the 4.50%-4.75% range. “It’s all of the policy changes that are happening. What’s the net effect? The overall effect on the economy at a given time? That’s a process … we go through all the time with every administration.”The first years of President Joe Biden’s administration, for example, saw passage of major infrastructure and other spending bills that added to growth but, many economists feel, also contributed to the eventual breakout of inflation that the Fed had to suppress with rapid rate hikes in 2022 and 2023.Inflation has since fallen and Fed policy rates are coming down as well, a process Powell said is still expected to lead over time to a more neutral rate of interest that neither stimulates nor restrains the economy.Yet the exact destination remains unknown, and may become even harder to pin down if fiscal and tax policies change as rapidly as Trump has pledged, particularly given the political tailwind of Republican control of the U.S. Senate and possibly the House of Representatives.Powell, who was appointed by Trump and then eventually clashed with him during the Republican president’s first term, will now oversee monetary policy during those first critical months of the new administration.Trump indicated over the summer, and a CNN report on Thursday reaffirmed, that he would let Powell continue as Fed chief until the end of his current four-year term in May of 2026 – and Powell said bluntly on Thursday that he would not resign if asked. The president, he said, had no authority under law to remove the head of the Fed, a position confirmed by the Senate, over a policy disagreement.”Not permitted under the law,” Powell said.’VERY GOOD PLACE’For now, at least, both inflation and interest rates are moving lower in line with a Fed outlook that sees price pressures continuing to ease amid ongoing economic growth and a job market the central bank says has “generally eased” but remains healthy.”The easy cuts have been made, and maybe December won’t be too contentious either,” said Elyse Ausenbaugh, head of investment strategy at J.P. Morgan Wealth Management, referring to the likelihood of another quarter-percentage-point rate cut at the Fed’s Dec. 17-18 meeting, its final one of the year. “Thereafter, I imagine the Fed is asking the same questions as investors – to what extent and when will the incoming Trump administration implement its campaign policy proposals?”Powell said for now the economic outlook was solid and the Fed hoped to keep it that way.”This further recalibration of our policy stance will help maintain the strength of the economy and the labor market, and will continue to enable further progress on inflation as we move toward a more neutral stance over time,” Powell said.”We think that the economy, and we think our policies, are both in a very good place, a very good place.”Treasury yields trimmed losses and the yield curve flattened after the release of the Fed’s unanimous policy decision. Futures markets continued to price in another quarter-percentage-point rate cut next month.The Fed’s policy statement noted that risks to the job market and inflation were “roughly in balance,” repeating language from the statement released after its Sept. 17-18 meeting. The new statement also slightly altered the reference to inflation, saying that price pressures had “made progress” towards the Fed’s objective, rather than the prior language that it had “made further progress.” The personal consumption expenditures price index excluding food and energy items, a key gauge of inflation, has changed little in the last three months, running at a roughly 2.6% annual rate as of September.Powell said that the language change was not meant to signal that inflation has been sticky. The Fed, he said, has always expected progress to be bumpy, and policymakers have gained confidence that inflation is on a sustainable path to the 2% goal. More

  • in

    Explainer-How Trump could influence the makeup of the Fed

    That said, Powell’s term as chair expires in May 2026, and Trump will have an opportunity to install a new Fed chief then. He will also have a chance to replace at least one other Fed governor during his term.Here’s a look at the Fed system’s structure and how the selection of policymakers works.THE FED SYSTEMThe Federal Reserve System, created by Congress in 1913, comprises the Washington-based Federal Reserve Board; 12 regional Federal Reserve banks dotted across the country; and the Federal Open Market Committee, including both Fed board members and regional bank heads.The Fed board has seven members, including an overall chair, two vice chairs – one for monetary policy and one for bank oversight – and four other governors. All are appointed by the president subject to confirmation by the Senate.Trump succeeded in appointing four board members during his presidency and elevated Powell, who was already a governor through an appointment by Trump’s predecessor, Democrat Barack Obama, to be the Fed chair. All of his successful appointees – including Powell and current governors Michelle Bowman and Christopher Waller – have hewn to the tradition of Fed independence. Three others who were seen by many as pushing that envelope – Stephen Moore, Judith Shelton and Herman Cain – withdrew or failed to win full Senate confirmation.Each regional Fed bank is run by a president appointed by a subcommittee of each bank’s board of directors. The FOMC, which has the all-important role of setting interest rate policy, comprises all seven board governors, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and four other regional bank presidents on a rotating basis.THE BOARD NOWFed governors are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate for 14-year terms, or for the unexpired remainder of a 14-year term for a previous incumbent. Term expirations are staggered at two-year intervals, with the next one due in 2026.Fed chairs and vice chairs are appointed for four-year terms that run concurrently with their governorships, and typically do not stay on as governor if not re-appointed to their leadership role. Powell’s position as chair expires in May 2026, and both vice chairs’ positions expire during the term of the next U.S. president.The following is a list of current governors, in order of their term expirations with the nearest listed first.Board Member Joined board, Board term Became chair /vice Chair/ vice term extended ends chair, reappointed chair term ends Adriana Kugler 9/13/2023 Jan 2026 Jerome Powell, 5/12/2012, Jan 2028 2/5/2018, May 2026 chair 6/14/2014 5/23/2022 Christopher Waller 12/18/2020 Jan 2030 Michael Barr, vice 7/19/2022 Jan 2032 7/19/2022 July 2026 chair for supervision Michelle Bowman 11/26/2018, Jan 2034 1/23/2020 Philip Jefferson, 5/23/2022 Jan 2036 9/13/2023 Sept 2027 vice chair Lisa Cook 5/23/2022, Jan 2038 9/8/2023 THE BANK PRESIDENTS NOWFed bank presidents are picked by the six non-banker members of their boards of directors, and must be approved by the Fed Board. They can serve until the mandatory retirement age of 65 or, if appointed after the age of 55, for 10 years or until they reach age 75.The terms of all current bank presidents end in February 2026, when they will be considered for a fresh five-year appointment by the Board of Governors. This reupping process historically has not resulted in any change in leadership, but this is custom not law. The following is a list of the Fed regional bank presidents with the term limit dates listed for the four whose terms will expire over the course of Trump’s next term.Bank President Expected end of term PHILADELPHIA Patrick Harker June 2025 RICHMOND Thomas Barkin Jan 2028 NEW YORK John Williams June 2028 SAN FRANCISCO Mary Daly Oct 2028 ATLANTA Raphael Bostic After 2028 BOSTON Susan Collins After 2028 KANSAS CITY Jeffrey Schmid After 2028 ST LOUIS Alberto Musalem After 2028 CHICAGO Austan Goolsbee After 2028 MINNEAPOLIS Neel Kashkari After 2028 DALLAS Lorie Logan After 2028 CLEVELAND Beth Hammack After 2028 More

  • in

    Fed’s Powell says he will not quit even if asked by Trump

    (Reuters) – Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said on Thursday he would refuse to leave office early if incoming President Donald Trump tried to oust him, adding he cannot be legally removed anyway.Speaking at a press conference following the latest meeting of the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee, Powell was asked if he’d exit central bank leadership if asked by Trump, who repeatedly attacked him in his first term as president. Powell said flatly “no” and noted that removing him, or any of the other Fed governors, ahead of the end of their terms is “not permitted under the law.” Powell spoke after the Fed met expectations and cut its interest rate target range by a quarter percentage point to between 4.5% and 4.75%, as officials continue to normalize monetary policy amid cooling inflation pressures. Ahead of the U.S. national elections on Tuesday, the Fed had been widely expected to press forward with interest rate cuts.Powell on Thursday brushed off numerous questions about what Trump’s stated policy aims could mean for central bank decision-making. “In the near-term the election will have no effects on our policy decisions,” Powell said, adding “we don’t guess, speculate and we don’t assume what the broader government might do.”Earlier on Thursday CNN had reported that a Trump advisor said the president-elect would keep Powell on through the end of his leadership term, which is set to expire in May 2026. Powell’s term as governor extends to the end of January, 2028. CNN reported that Trump is considering either former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh, now a persistent critic of the central bank, and his former administration chief economist Kevin Hassett as potential Powell replacements. Fed leadership hold roles that are designed by law to protect them from political pressure and removal outside of their formal terms.SOURED RELATIONSHIPTrump named Powell as Fed chair in early 2018 to replace Janet Yellen, who later became President Joe Biden’s Treasury Secretary. Biden reappointed Powell to his current term. But the relationship between Trump and Powell turned sour, with Trump frequently attacking the Fed and its chief during his first term in office for the central bank’s policy choices, although policymakers routinely shrugged off the harsh words. Trump’s Fed attacks broke from decades of presidents steering clear of direct criticism of the central bank, which operates with legal independence subject to the oversight of Congress.Any attempt to try to eject a Fed leader, even if unsuccessful, would likely be received very negatively by financial markets and would also likely fuel fears of rising price pressures. At the same time, policies Trump says he favors – high and expansive trade tariffs and massive deportations of undocumented immigrants – are likely to restart the fires of inflation the central bank has had success cooling.If Trump policies do create that reality it could stop the Fed from cutting rates as far as it might otherwise have expected, and could even force the central bank to raise rates. For some observers, that suggests the Fed and Trump might be on a collision course. But for now, the Fed has some breathing room. “President-elect Trump is likely to pressure the Fed to cut interest rates more aggressively like he did during his first term, but at least over the next year it will have little effect on the trajectory of interest rates since the Fed system is structured to insulate rate decisions from pressure from the White House,” said Bill Adams, chief economist for Comerica (NYSE:CMA) Bank. More

  • in

    Fed cuts interest rates as Powell says he will not resign as chair

    Standard DigitalStandard & FT Weekend Printwasnow $29 per 3 monthsThe new FT Digital Edition: today’s FT, cover to cover on any device. This subscription does not include access to ft.com or the FT App.What’s included Global news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts20 monthly gift articles to shareLex: FT’s flagship investment column15+ Premium newsletters by leading expertsFT Digital Edition: our digitised print editionWeekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysisFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysisGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts10 monthly gift articles to shareGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts20 monthly gift articles to shareLex: FT’s flagship investment column15+ Premium newsletters by leading expertsFT Digital Edition: our digitised print editionEverything in PrintWeekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysisPlusEverything in Premium DigitalEverything in Standard DigitalGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresFirstFT newsletterVideos & PodcastsFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit app10 gift articles per monthExclusive FT analysisPremium newslettersFT Digital Edition10 additional gift articles per monthMake and share highlightsFT WorkspaceMarkets data widgetSubscription ManagerWorkflow integrationsOccasional readers go freeVolume discountFT Weekend Print deliveryPlusEverything in Standard DigitalFT Weekend Print deliveryPlusEverything in Premium Digital More

  • in

    Trump’s Tax Proposals Face a Fiscal Reckoning

    No tax on tips? Lower corporate taxes? No tax on Social Security benefits?The slew of tax cuts President-elect Donald J. Trump proposed in loosely defined slogans over the course of his victorious campaign will now face a fiscal reckoning in Washington. While Republicans are poised to control both chambers of Congress, opening a path for Mr. Trump’s plans, the party is now grappling with how far they can take another round of tax cuts.Mr. Trump’s ambitions for a second term will ultimately have to compete with the signature accomplishment from his first: the giant tax package that Republicans passed and Mr. Trump signed into law in 2017. Large swaths of that tax cut expire at the end of next year, setting up an expensive debate that could overshadow Mr. Trump’s other goals.“Nobody wants to acknowledge at all the sheer enormity of the challenge,” said Liam Donovan, a Republican strategist. “There’s a reckoning coming.”Unlike in 2016, when Mr. Trump’s victory surprised many in Washington, Republicans have spent months preparing for their return to power. They have been discussing using a fast-track budget process that skirts the supermajority requirement for legislation in the Senate, a tactic that would allow for a party-line passage of more tax cuts if Republicans ultimately keep control of the House.But lawmakers and advisers to Mr. Trump are undecided about how much money they can commit to lowering the nation’s taxes again. The cost of just preserving the status quo is steep. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that continuing all of the expiring provisions would cost roughly $4 trillion over a decade, and Mr. Trump’s campaign proposals could add trillions more to the debt.In interviews before the election, some Republicans said the party would have to show some fiscal discipline.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    FirstFT: Chinese exports soar as Beijing prepares for Trump’s tariff threats

    Standard DigitalStandard & FT Weekend Printwasnow $29 per 3 monthsThe new FT Digital Edition: today’s FT, cover to cover on any device. This subscription does not include access to ft.com or the FT App.What’s included Global news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts20 monthly gift articles to shareLex: FT’s flagship investment column15+ Premium newsletters by leading expertsFT Digital Edition: our digitised print editionWeekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysisFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysisGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts10 monthly gift articles to shareGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit appFirstFT: the day’s biggest stories20+ curated newslettersFollow topics & set alerts with myFTFT Videos & Podcasts20 monthly gift articles to shareLex: FT’s flagship investment column15+ Premium newsletters by leading expertsFT Digital Edition: our digitised print editionEverything in PrintWeekday Print EditionFT WeekendFT Digital EditionGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresExclusive FT analysisPlusEverything in Premium DigitalEverything in Standard DigitalGlobal news & analysisExpert opinionSpecial featuresFirstFT newsletterVideos & PodcastsFT App on Android & iOSFT Edit app10 gift articles per monthExclusive FT analysisPremium newslettersFT Digital Edition10 additional gift articles per monthMake and share highlightsFT WorkspaceMarkets data widgetSubscription ManagerWorkflow integrationsOccasional readers go freeVolume discountFT Weekend Print deliveryPlusEverything in Standard DigitalFT Weekend Print deliveryPlusEverything in Premium Digital More