More stories

  • in

    Germany was billed as Europe’s growth driver. Now economists are saying: Not so fast

    Germany was a hub of excitement earlier this year amid high hopes of an economic rebound — domestically, and across Europe.
    European Central Bank Governing Council member Martins Kazaks told CNBC that “the big hope lies on Germany” when it comes to fiscal spending boosting the euro zone economy next year.
    “The actual spending is slower than many of the more excitable pundits had expected. In Germany, it takes time to spend money,” said Berenberg’s Holger Schmieding.

    German Chancellor Friedrich Merz addresses the Bundestag during a debate over the 2025 federal budget on September 17, 2025 in Berlin, Germany.
    Nadja Wohlleben | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    Huge investment pledges and major fiscal changes had bolstered hopes that Germany could give the euro zone economy a much-needed boost, but economists are starting to question if — and when — that will happen.
    Germany was a hub of excitement earlier this year, with many politicians, analysts and economists sharing big hopes of an economic rebound — domestically, and across Europe.

    It had moved to amend its long-standing debt brake rule, which limits how much debt the government can take on and dictates the size of the federal government’s structural budget deficit. Certain defense and security expenses above a specific threshold are exempt from the debt brake under the new rules.
    The country also opted to create a 500 billion euro ($592 billion) infrastructure and climate investment fund.
    The shift was considered a potential game-changer at the time, and was widely billed as a way to turn Germany’s sluggish economy around.
    The country recorded annual contractions in both 2023 and 2024, with 2025 also off to a muted start. While gross domestic product grew 0.3% in the first quarter, it shrank by 0.3% over the following three months, according to the latest data.
    The euro zone economy more broadly is also struggling, posting growth of 0.6% in the first quarter, although this slowed to just 0.1% in the following three months.

    European Central Bank Governing Council member Martins Kazaks told CNBC earlier this month that “the big hope lies on Germany” when it comes to fiscal spending boosting the euro zone economy next year.
    But it’s looking increasingly unclear whether this will come to fruition.

    ‘In Germany, it takes time to spend money’

    Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Berenberg, told CNBC, that a “major rise” in defense orders and infrastructure investment had started in Germany.
    “[But] we are not seeing it strongly in actual output data yet,” he said.
    “All in all, everything is progressing as we expected after the big debt brake reform. The actual spending is slower than many of the more excitable pundits had expected. In Germany, it takes time to spend money.”
    Meanwhile, Franziska Palmas, senior Europe economist at Capital Economics, flagged a “much higher deficit” in Germany over the coming years as a result of the spending splurge — along with some potentially unforeseen outcomes.
    “Something that perhaps has gone a bit unnoticed is that the government is not just raising defence and infrastructure spending, it is also using some of the additional fiscal space to finance other spending,” she said.
    This includes, for example, the financing of electricity tax cuts for businesses, but also covering higher pension, healthcare and social benefit costs, Palmas pointed out.
    “Things like electricity tax cuts still will have a positive effect on the economy, but the additional spending on healthcare and pensions won’t boost the economy given it reflects mainly rising costs due to demographics,” Palmas noted.
    While Palmas said the changes will help Germany’s economy grow in 2026, she warned that the expansion may not be as strong as many economists are anticipating.

    A minimal boost?

    Major German economic institutes have recently cut their economic projections for the country and now expect growth of just over 1% next year.
    The European Central Bank, meanwhile, is expecting the euro zone to grow by 1% in 2026.
    Berenberg’s Schmieding calculates that the fiscal stimulus in Germany will add around 0.3 percentage points to the country’s own growth rate, which he says would boost the euro zone economy by 0.1 percentage points.
    Palmas, meanwhile, sees Germany’s growth adding around 0.2% to the euro zone’s in 2026.
    Beyond Germany, several other factors are set to impact euro zone growth next year. Those include the recent interest rate cuts from the ECB, according to Palmas, as well as strong growth from Spain, which has been boosted by immigration and employment growth.

    “On the other hand, U.S. tariffs are likely to be a small drag on the economy (we think they will subtract around 0.2% from GDP),” she said. “And in France, fiscal tightening will also weigh on growth.”
    But Germany’s rebound should have knock-on effects that go beyond just GDP, Schmieding pointed out.
    “The transition of Germany from its mini-recession until mid-2024 to significant growth from late 2025 onwards will have modest positive confidence effect on its neighbours. After all, Germany is usually their most important trading partner,” he said. More

  • in

    Missing: services disinflation

    Client Challenge

    JavaScript is disabled in your browser.
    Please enable JavaScript to proceed.

    A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser
    extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your
    connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser. More

  • in

    Why it might be the time to repeal the Fed’s dual mandate

    Client Challenge

    JavaScript is disabled in your browser.
    Please enable JavaScript to proceed.

    A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser
    extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your
    connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser. More

  • in

    Hassett says Fed made ‘prudent call,’ signaling White House OK with quarter-point cut

    The Fed’s decision to cut its key borrowing rate by a quarter percentage point seems to be sitting well with the White House if National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett is any indication.
    Assessing the economic variables at play and deciding on the incremental reduction was a proper move, said Hassett, who has been mentioned on the short list of Trump’s picks as the next Fed chair.

    The Federal Reserve’s decision to cut its key borrowing rate by a quarter percentage point seems to be sitting well with the White House, if National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett is any indication.
    In a CNBC interview Thursday, the day after the Fed’s move, Hassett noted that the administration, and new Fed Governor Stephen Miran, had been pushing for a bigger reduction. Miran, who is on leave as head of the Council of Economic Advisers, pushed for a half-point cut but was outvoted 11 to 1 on the Federal Open Market Committee.

    However, Hassett was not critical of the committee’s decision.
    “The bottom line is that moving kind of slow and steady and heading towards a target, watch the data come in, that’s what prudent policy is,” he said on “Squawk Box.” “So I know that my colleague Stephen wanted to go to 50 [basis points], but I think 25 was pretty broad consensus, and I think that’s a good first step in the right direction to much lower rates.”
    President Donald Trump, who nominated Miran to the post, has yet to comment on the Fed’s decision.
    In the past, Trump has launched a barrage of criticism at the central bank, nicknaming Chair Jerome Powell “Too Late” and calling for quick and aggressive cuts. The president has suggested the benchmark federal funds rate should be 3 percentage points lower, a position not reflected in FOMC projections for the future course of policy in updates released Wednesday.
    Hassett noted strong economic growth trending above 3% for the third quarter, something that normally wouldn’t argue for lower interest rates, particularly with inflation running above the Fed’s 2% target.

    However, Trump has said cuts are needed to support the struggling U.S. housing market and to help manage financing costs for the nation’s $37 trillion debt.
    Assessing the economic variables at play and deciding on the incremental reduction was a proper move, said Hassett, who has been mentioned on the short list of Trump’s picks to replace Powell as chair next year.
    “I think it’s much more prudent for the Fed to be looking at all the models, to have a diversity of opinions and decide, ‘What are we going to do in this economy that really looks to be taken off with inflation that’s decelerating, but higher than the target?'” he said. “They split the baby in this decision, and I think that’s probably a pretty prudent call.” More

  • in

    The EU’s secret weapon for economic success

    Client Challenge

    JavaScript is disabled in your browser.
    Please enable JavaScript to proceed.

    A required part of this site couldn’t load. This may be due to a browser
    extension, network issues, or browser settings. Please check your
    connection, disable any ad blockers, or try using a different browser. More