More stories

  • in

    Many people can’t afford long-term care insurance. One proposal calls for creating a federal program to help

    For many Americans, finding affordable long-term care is a challenge.
    Still, around 7 in 10 individuals will need that care at some point.
    One congressman wants to create a federal program to help families cope with those costs.

    Hinterhaus Productions | Getty Images

    As a historic wave of baby boomers reaches retirement age, finding affordable long-term care is a challenge.
    “We’re going to have a major storm coming in our country with all these folks that can’t take care of themselves,” Rep. Tom Suozzi, D-New York, said Thursday at the Employee Benefit Research Institute policy forum in Washington, D.C.

    When Suozzi was growing up, all four of his grandparents lived with his family, who took care of them.
    That experience inspired Suozzi’s parents to buy long-term care insurance. Both of his parents lived into their 90s and were able to stay at home, thanks to those policies, he said.
    Now, that same insurance coverage is out of reach for many Americans.
    “People can’t afford long-term care insurance anymore,” Suozzi said. “The insurance companies, when they made a bet on this the first time around, they lost a lot of money because they didn’t take into account that a lot of people live much longer than their actuarial tables.”
    More from Personal Finance:Student loan borrowers may find bankruptcy harder under TrumpCollege enrollment falls 5% for 18-year-old freshmen’Dynamic pricing’ was a top contender for word of the year

    Meanwhile, nursing homes and Medicaid are not equipped to handle the issue, he said.
    To address that, Suozzi said he plans to reintroduce a bill called the Well-Being Insurance for Seniors to be at Home, or WISH, Act. The proposal calls for the federal government to create a fund for catastrophic long-term care to help older Americans age at home.
    Suozzi last introduced the bill in 2021. That version of the proposal called for long-term care benefits to be available to individuals who have reached retirement age and who are disabled, have severe cognitive impairment or who are unable to perform at least two activities of daily living.

    Like Social Security and Medicare, Americans would also need to contribute to the program through a payroll tax to receive the benefits.
    The amount of benefits received would be around $3,600 to $4,000 per month, Suozzi said on Thursday. Per the 2021 proposal, that is based on the median cost paid personal assistance for six hours per day.
    Waiting periods for care would be based on income, with longer delays for coverage for higher income individuals.

    A ‘tough sell’ to raise taxes

    Admittedly, the proposal could face hurdles to gaining support.
    “The challenge is nobody wants to raise taxes for anything,” Suozzi said on Thursday.
    It is a “tough sell” to tell people that there’s a mandatory tax for long-term care, particularly since not everyone will need those benefits, Ben Veghte, director of the WA Cares Fund, said Thursday during a separate long-term care discussion at the EBRI conference.
    The WA Cares Fund is a public long-term care insurance program provided to workers in the state of Washington. It is funded by a 0.58% tax on employee’s gross wages.

    An estimated 7 in 10 people will need long-term care in their lifetimes, according to Veghte. But that often prompts people to wonder about the other 3 in 10, and why those people have to pay taxes for benefits they may never receive.
    In the next decade, at least two or three states will attempt to create long-term care programs like Washington’s, Veghte said. Among the states exploring the idea include California, New York, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and Minnesota, he said.
    Once that happens, the private insurance industry will likely start to offer supplemental products, Veghte said.
    “It’s going to take all of us to address the costs associated with long term care and the crisis ahead of us,” Veghte said. “It’s private industry, it’s government, it’s employers, it’s family caregivers, because we know the cost is more than just financial.” More

  • in

    Biden-era retirement rule may be in jeopardy after Trump takes office

    The U.S. Labor Department issued a retirement security rule in April. Two Texas courts seem inclined to overturn it.
    The administration of President-elect Donald Trump, who has signaled his intent to pursue a deregulatory agenda, may decline to keep defending the “fiduciary” rule in court, attorneys said.
    The same thing happened during Trump’s first term, with respect to a similar Obama-era DOL fiduciary rule.

    Brandon Bell | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    A Labor Department rule that shields retirement savers from getting harmful investment advice is at risk of being overturned during President-elect Donald Trump’s second term — an outcome that would have an element of déjà vu, said legal experts.
    The Biden-era regulation, issued in April, aims to rein in conflicts of interest that may taint investment recommendations from unscrupulous advisors, brokers or insurance agents.

    Officials worry such conflicts might lead an agent to profit at the consumer’s expense, such as when investors are advised to roll money from workplace retirement plans like a 401(k) to an individual retirement account.

    The most immediate threat to President Joe Biden’s Retirement Security Rule is that the Trump administration declines to keep defending it in court, attorneys said.
    The rule faces an uphill legal battle. Two Texas federal courts have already stalled its implementation and seem very likely to kill it, legal experts said.
    “At that point, the Trump administration could walk away from the case, just abandon it,” said Fred Reish, a retirement law expert and partner at Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP.

    ‘Here we go again’?

    What the DOL fiduciary rule does

    A primary goal of the Department of Labor rule is to raise the investment-advice standard tied to 401(k)-to-IRA rollovers, especially those for certain insurance products, experts said.
    Rollovers are common for recent retirees. They are becoming more prevalent as baby boomers reach retirement age.
    About 5.7 million people rolled over $618 billion into IRAs in 2020, according to the most recent IRS data. By 2022, that dollar amount had grown to $779 billion, according to the White House Council of Economic Advisers.
    The new Labor rule “makes it highly likely that rollover recommendations are subject to a fiduciary standard,” Reish said.

    U.S. Labor Secretary Julie Su.
    Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    A fiduciary standard is a legal structure whereby financial professionals — brokers, advisors, insurance agents and others — must recommend investments that are in a client’s best interest instead of ones, for example, that generate more of a profit for the agent.  
    However, relative to rollovers, many retirement investors may not get such fiduciary advice, attorneys said.
    The Employee Retirement Income Security Act stipulates that one-time advice to an investor — instead of an ongoing client relationship — generally doesn’t meet the fiduciary bar.
    Since rollovers are often a one-off transaction, many aren’t covered by this heightened protection under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, attorneys said.
    The Biden-era rule would likely have the largest impact on insurance agents that sell “non-securities” products, which include certain annuities like indexed annuities, attorneys said.

    Such agents would likely be required to assess additional factors in their rollover analyses, including whether it’s in a consumer’s best interest to take money from their 401(k) plan and move it to an annuity, Reish said.
    Investment advisors and brokers who sell securities products, such as mutual funds or exchange-traded funds, are already subject to a Securities and Exchange Commission rule issued in 2019 that is “in many ways like the DOL’s rule,” Reish said.

    Texas courts likely to strike down DOL rule

    Two federal district courts in Texas issued a national “stay” of the regulation, in separate rulings in July.
    They indefinitely delayed the rule’s Sept. 23 start date while the courts conduct a more detailed review of the lawsuits, which were filed by several insurance industry groups.
    Lawyers expect the courts to overturn the rule. Indeed, the judges hinted at that outcome.
    “The Rule is almost certainly unlawful for a broad class of investment professionals in the industry — not just plaintiffs,” according to a July 26 order by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, in the lawsuit American Council of Life Insurers v. United States Department of Labor.
    ACLI and other insurance industry groups lauded that decision, calling the regulation “DOL’s latest attempt to vastly expand its statutory authority by imposing fiduciary status on almost every financial professional who sells retirement products.”
    The other Texas case is Federation of Americans for Consumer Choice v. Department of Labor.

    If the case were appealed by either side, it would go to the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals — the same one that killed a similar Obama-era fiduciary rule.
    At either stage, the Trump administration could choose to stop defending the regulation, attorneys said.
    Trump has signaled an intention to pursue a deregulatory agenda during his second term.
    “None of that is certain,” Reish said. “President-elect Trump is both a Republican and a populist. We don’t know if conservative Republican philosophies will prevail on any given issue, or whether a populist approach would prevail.” More

  • in

    What are Social Security’s trust funds? New debate emerges on program’s financing

    As Social Security’s trust funds run low, new leadership in Washington will face the dilemma of how to fix the program.
    This week, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah criticized the program, saying: “We were sold a dream, but received a nightmare,” and calling for “real reform.”
    Lee’s social media posts renewed questions on how exactly the program is funded. Experts say the answers aren’t simple.

    Richard Stephen | Istock | Getty Images

    New leadership has yet to be sworn in, in Washington, D.C. Yet Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, ignited a debate this week on the future of Social Security with a series of posts on social media platform X.
    The program, which provides monthly checks to more than 65 million beneficiaries, faces funding issues that may prevent the program from paying full benefits in as soon as nine years.

    “We were sold a dream, but received a nightmare,” Lee stated in the X thread on Monday. “It’s time for a wake-up call. We need real reform.”
    More from Personal Finance:Student loan borrowers may find bankruptcy harder under TrumpCollege enrollment falls 5% for 18-year-old freshmen’Dynamic pricing’ was a top contender for word of the year
    Experts on both sides of the aisle generally agree it’s better to address Social Security’s funding woes sooner rather than later.
    “It’s a system that requires a fix,” said Charles Blahous, senior research strategist at George Mason University’s Mercatus Center and former public trustee for Social Security. “Acting like everything is fine and that we can just ignore it for a few years would not serve the public well.”
    Meanwhile, Lee’s post on Social Security — in which he said it is “almost fair to compare it to a Ponzi scheme that’s running out of new investors” — prompted mixed responses.

    Elon Musk, who has been tasked with cutting government spending under President-elect Donald Trump, shared Lee’s post while calling it “interesting.” Yet Social Security advocacy groups were quick to defend the program they said has never missed a benefit payment in nearly 90 years.
    Among the issues Lee identified is the mechanism for holding money used to pay benefits, commonly known as the “trust funds.”
    “This money doesn’t sit in a nice, individual account with your name on it,” Lee stated in his X thread. “No, it goes into a huge account called the ‘Social Security Trust Fund.'”

    What are Social Security’s trust funds?

    Social Security mostly relies on payroll taxes paid by both workers and their employers for funding, according to a recent Congressional Research Service report.
    But the program also receives money from other sources, including federal income taxes some Social Security beneficiaries pay on their benefits, reimbursements from the Treasury’s general fund and interest income from investments held in its trust funds.
    That latter source — the trust funds — hold money that is not needed in the current year to pay benefits and administrative costs, according to the Social Security Administration. The money in the trust funds is invested in special Treasury bonds that are guaranteed by the U.S. government.
    The interest on those securities is tied to market rates. The trust fund’s bonds are redeemed when they either are needed to pay benefits or they expire.
    “The trust funds basically keep track of what workers have paid into the system,” Blahous said.
    Social Security’s trust funds prompt headlines each year when Social Security’s trustees release their annual report on the program’s financial outlook.

    President George W. Bush is shown paper evidence of US Treasury Bonds in the Social Security trust funds by Susan Chapman, director of the Division of Federal Investments, during a tour of the Bureau of Public Debt in Parkersburg, West Virginia on April 5, 2005. 
    Luke Frazza | Afp | Getty Images

    The program’s two trust funds are legally distinct and generally do not have the authority to borrow from each other.
    The trust fund used to pay benefits to retired workers — as well as their spouses, children and survivors, should they die — faces the soonest estimated depletion date of 2033, when just 79% of those benefits will be payable if Congress does not act before that.
    Lee is not the first politician to question Social Security’s trust fund structure. In 2005, then President George W. Bush said the trust funds are the equivalent of government IOUs in a four-drawer filing cabinet. More recently, during a 2023 Budget Committee Senate hearing, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisconsin, held up a photo of a filing cabinet when discussing the program’s funding.
    “This is the Social Security trust fund,” Johnson said. “It’s a four-drawer file in Parkersburg, West Virginia.”

    In response, Stephen Goss, chief actuary at the Social Security Administration, said at the time that the funds are “all electronic.”
    By pointing to filing cabinets, the politicians imply the trust funds aren’t real, said Andrew Biggs, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and former principal deputy commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Yet if someone has a retirement account with Vanguard or a defined benefit pension, it would also be represented with a paper document, he said.
    “These trust fund bonds are real,” Biggs said.

    Experts say the trust funds are misunderstood

    Social Security’s trust funds are legitimate, in the same way as Treasury bonds are issued to China, a pension fund or a grandmother on behalf of a grandchild, said Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, an advocacy organization.
    “They all have the same legal status,” Altman said. “If Congress didn’t pay it, it would be a matter of default, so this is a matter of law.”
    In his post on X, Lee said: “the government routinely raids” Social Security’s trust fund.
    The general fund of the Treasury is allowed to borrow from the Social Security trust funds, according to the Congressional Research Service. When that happens, those funds are typically paid back with interest.
    “This is standard accounting practice and not considered raiding in a legal sense,” said Jason Fichtner, chief economist at the Bipartisan Policy Center, who previously worked in several senior positions at the Social Security Administration.

    During a July 2023 Senate hearing on protecting Social Security, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisconsin, describes the program’s trust funds as a “four-drawer file.”
    Source: U.S. Senate Floor

    If Social Security has a surplus, they’re required to invest it with the federal government, according to Biggs. That means the federal government is required to borrow it, he said.
    However, that borrowing mostly stopped 15 years ago, since Social Security no longer has surpluses, Biggs said.
    In his X post, Lee also focused on the extra interest Social Security’s investments could earn if the money were invested more aggressively in stocks. Sen Bill Cassidy, R-Louisiana, has also called for investing in stocks on the program’s behalf.
    But rather than talking about Social Security as an investment, we should be focusing on it as a social insurance program that’s funded by a payroll tax, said the Bipartisan Policy Center’s Fichtner.
    The program provides both retirement and disability benefits and is designed to be progressive, so Americans with lower lifetime earnings get a higher income replacement rate. Focusing on the income replacement the program provides can help identify which reform proposals are helpful and necessary, Fichtner said.
    “In general, we should be having an open, honest discussion about Social Security and the important role plays in the foundation of retirement security for Americans,” Fichtner said. More

  • in

    The road to $100,000 — What’s behind bitcoin’s storied 2024 run

    The digital coin crossed the six-figure threshold Wednesday night and is now up more than 140% in 2024.
    Bitcoin exchange-traded funds attracted tens of billions of dollars of inflows since their debut in January.
    President-elect Donald Trump appears to be a converted fan of bitcoin and the crypto industry.

    A novelty Bitcoin token arranged in front of the price of the cryptocurrency against the US dollar, reaching over $100,000, in Hong Kong, China, on Thursday, Dec. 5, 2024. 
    Paul Yeung | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Bitcoin’s long-awaited push above $100,000 comes during the culmination of a year in which the leading cryptocurrency was embraced by key Wall Street institutions and became a hot topic in the U.S. presidential election.
    For years, bitcoin bulls predicted a rally to $100,000 as a way to show their optimism about crypto. But many on Wall Street dismissed them. The digital coin crossed the six-figure threshold Wednesday night and is now up more than 140% in 2024.

    Stock chart icon

    Bitcoin is up more than 140% in 2024.

    Wall Street Institutions embrace

    The start of 2024 is a fitting way to frame the latest leg of bitcoin’s journey, since the first bitcoin ETFs launched on Jan. 11. The funds attracted tens of billions of dollars of inflows since their debut, led by the iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), which now has $50 billion in assets.
    While there are still a few notable holdouts among investment firms, the launch and rapid growth of these funds is the most visible example of the acceptance of bitcoin by the traditional financial system. After being seen for years as a speculative asset for retail traders, institutional buying has pushed bitcoin to another level.
    “Institutions have net-bought 683,000 bitcoins YTD, via US spot ETFs and large purchases by MicroStrategy, a software company and Bitcoin proxy. A significant 245,000 of these inflows have occurred in the weeks since the US election … This has helped to propel BTC through the USD 100,000 level,” Geoff Kendrick, global head of digital assets research at Standard Chartered Bank, said in a note to clients Thursday.

    Trump’s conversion

    Bitcoin has also been making inroads with the political institutions of the United States. The crypto lobby spent heavily during the 2024 election cycle, and President-elect Donald Trump appears to be a converted fan of bitcoin and the industry.

    President-elect Donald Trump gestures at the Bitcoin 2024 event in Nashville, Tennessee, on July 27, 2024.
    Kevin Wurm | Reuters

    Trump went to the Bitcoin Conference in Nashville as part of his campaign. His pick to lead the Securities and Exchange Commission, Paul Atkins, is seen as friendly to the crypto industry — and a dramatic change from current SEC Chair Gary Gensler.

    “This current administration has been hostile to crypto, very much so. We’ve been kind of a victim of that alongside the broader industry. So having people that come in, that understand it and embrace it, is very important for the industry,” Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev said Thursday on “Squawk Box.” Robinhood offers crypto trading on its brokerage platform.
    The price of bitcoin is up 49% since Nov. 4, the day before the presidential election.
    Bitcoin may have even gotten a little boost from Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to push it over the $100,000 milestone. Powell said Wednesday that bitcoin is a competitor to gold, not the U.S. dollar. That’s hardly a ringing endorsement of cryptocurrency, but the world’s top central banker comparing bitcoin to one of the world’s oldest investment assets could be seen as a sign of legitimacy.

    Don’t miss these cryptocurrency insights from CNBC Pro: More

  • in

    What Fed Chief Powell said about crypto that may have aided bitcoin’s rally to $100,000

    Bitcoin’s meteoric run may have gotten a little extra push from an unlikely source: Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.
    “It’s not a competitor for the dollar, it’s really a competitor for gold,” the central bank leader said Wednesday.

    Jerome Powell, chairman of the US Federal Reserve, during the New York Times DealBook Summit at Jazz at Lincoln Center in New York, US, on Wednesday, Dec. 4, 2024. 
    Yuki Iwamura | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Bitcoin’s meteoric run may have gotten a little extra push from an unlikely source: Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.
    In comments Wednesday about the cryptocurrency, the central bank leader noted that he does not and cannot own any himself. In addition, he said the Fed’s role in regulating bitcoin and its competitors is limited.

    However, he also maintained that bitcoin is not a challenge for traditional currencies like the U.S. dollar but rather gold.
    “People use bitcoin as a speculative asset,” Powell told CNBC’s Andrew Ross Sorkin during the New York Times’ DealBook conference. “It’s just like gold only it’s virtual, it’s digital. People are not using it as a form of payment or as a store of value. It’s highly volatile. It’s not a competitor for the dollar, it’s really a competitor for gold.”
    For those who watch the crypto markets, the Powell comments, whether unwittingly, provided a sense of legitimacy for bitcoin and helped drive another leg higher. Bitcoin jumped 4% in morning trade Thursday, pushing over the $103,000 mark.

    Stock chart icon

    Bitcoin’s rise

    “We believe the Fed chair’s comparison of bitcoin to gold is a significant development as it introduces another level of credibility to bitcoin as a major asset in global markets,” said Joel Kruger, market strategist at LMAX Group, which runs an exchange for currency and crypto trading.
    “The fact that gold is still about 10 times larger than bitcoin should offer additional insight into how much more room there is for bitcoin to grow from current levels,” he added.

    Bitcoin rose sharply to start the year then largely traded in a volatile but fairly tight range — until Donald Trump captured the presidential election on Nov. 5. Since then, it has soared close to 50% as the president-elect’s pro-crypto remarks have fueled another price surge that took bitcoin past the $100,000 mark Wednesday. By contrast, gold is about flat since the election, though it is up nearly 30% year to date.
    To be sure, how much Powell’s comments helped propel the last move is unknown.
    The remarks comparing it to bitcoin came the same day that Trump made formal his widely anticipated intention to nominate financier Paul Atkins, also a strong crypto supporter, as chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
    The position is a key regulatory post and could provide a smoother market ride particularly after the current SEC leader, Gary Gensler, has been an enemy of the crypto industry. More

  • in

    Remembering Art Cashin’s most valuable stock market lessons – and the stories behind them

    Art Cashin speaking at the NYSE on Dec. 30th, 2022. 

    Art Cashin, UBS’ director of floor operations and a fixture at the New York Stock Exchange for nearly 60 years, died this week at age 83. 
    Cashin was one of the great historians of the stock market, but he was not an academic. His method of teaching did not involve citing academic studies. Instead, he taught by telling stories.

    In an attempt to explain why people should think deeper about what they are doing, he often told stories that illustrated a favorite theme: Why the obvious answer is not always the correct answer. 

    Cuban Missile Crisis: Buy when the missiles are flying

    Cashin had to live through the constant specter of a nuclear attack in the early 1960s. One such incident taught him that sometimes investment decisions are not entirely logical.
    Back then, he was spending a considerable amount of time with one of his earliest mentors, an over-the-counter trader in silver stocks whom he called Professor Jack. Here’s how Cashin told it:
    “We were not quite to the Cuban Missile Crisis. We were getting there and I was still not a member yet. It was the early 60s, and word spread that something had happened and that the Russians had actually pressed the button and that the missiles were flying. The option market wasn’t on an exchange in those days, it was over-the-counter and you had to call around. I had virtually no money, and I was looking to see if I could make a $100 bet by buying a put or some such things. And everywhere I called I couldn’t get anything done. So I cleaned up and rushed down to the bar. And Professor Jack was already in the bar, and I came bursting through the doors as only a 19- or 20-year-old could. And I said, ‘Jack, Jack. The rumors are that the missiles are flying.’
    And he said, ‘Kid, sit down and buy me a drink.’

    And I sat down and he said, ‘Listen carefully. When you hear the missiles are flying, you buy them, you don’t sell them.’
    And I looked at him, and I said, ‘You buy them, you don’t sell them?’
    He said, ‘Of course, because if you’re wrong the trade will never clear. We’ll all be dead.'”

    How do you determine the right price?

    Cashin’s stories often illustrated some aspect of investing.
    Volumes have been written explaining the concept of “price discovery” — that is, how anyone determines what the right price to pay for a stock should be. Scholarly papers have been written about supply and demand, as well as the information available to buyers and sellers at the time of the transaction.
    To explain price discovery, Cashin liked to tell the story of the time the jeweler Charles Lewis Tiffany tried to sell an expensive diamond stickpin to John Pierpont Morgan.
    Tiffany, Cashin said, knew that J.P. Morgan loved diamond stickpins, which he used to put in his tie. One day, the jeweler sent a man around to Morgan’s office with an envelope and a box wrapped in gift paper. Morgan opened the envelope, and in it was a message from Tiffany: “My dear Mr. Morgan, I know of your great fascination with diamond stickpins. Enclosed in this box is an absolutely exquisite example. Since it is so exquisite and unusual, its price is $5,000.”

    In those days, Cashin noted, $5,000 was north of $150,000 in present dollars.
    The note continued: “My man will leave the stickpin with you and will return to my office. He will come back tomorrow. If you choose to accept it, you may give him a check for $5,000. If you choose not to accept it, you may give him the box back with the diamond stickpin.”
    The next day, Tiffany’s man came back to see Morgan.
    Morgan presented him with the box rewrapped in new paper, along with a note, which said, “My dear Mr. Tiffany, as you’ve said, the stickpin was magnificent. However, the price seems a bit excessive. Instead of $5,000, enclosed you will find a check for $4,000. If you choose to accept that, you may send the pin back to me, and if not, you may keep the pin and tear up the check.”
    The man returned to Tiffany, who read the note and saw the offer for $4,000. He knew he could still make money on the offer, but felt the pin was still worth the $5,000 he was asking.
    The jeweler said to the man, “You may return the check to Mr. Morgan, and tell him I hope to do business with him in the future.” Tiffany then took the wrapping off the box, opened it up and found not the stickpin, but a check for $5,000 and a note that said, “Just checking the price.” 

    How do smart people read the tape?

    Cashin passionately believed that the market reflected all available information — even if some were able to come to different conclusions than others. Often when the market moved for reasons that were not obvious, Cashin would come up with some plausible but not obvious reason why.
    He was fond of telling a story about a man who looked at the markets during a national disaster and read the tape in a very different way than everyone else.

    Art Cashin
    Adam Jeffery | CNBC

    It was Nov. 22, 1963 — the day President John F. Kennedy was assassinated.
    “I was upstairs,” Cashin told me, “And the market was selling off. And a broker on the floor, Tommy McKinnon, called up. I was in the order room. And he said, ‘Is there anything on the tape about the president?’
    And I said, ‘No. Why do you ask?’ And he said, ‘Merrill Lynch is all over the floor, selling.’ And I asked him why, and he said, ‘Something about the president.'”
    “So I went back. The news ticker had a bell that would ring once for ordinary news, twice for something that was special, and three for really dynamic news. And the bell rang three times. And I ran back about 15 feet to where the news ticker was. And the headline was, ‘Shots Reported Fired at President’s Motorcade in Dallas.’ And I ran back to call the floor of the Exchange to tell Tommy. And before he could pick up, the bell rang three times again. And it said, ‘President Rumored to Have Been Hit.’ And I went back to call him again. And again, the bell rang three times. And it said, ‘President’s Motorcade Diverted to Parkland Hospital in Dallas.’ And that’s when they shut the Exchange down.”
    “The amazing thing, to me, was how did Merrill Lynch know before anything was on the news ticker? And it was a lesson to me in Wall Street. Presidents didn’t travel much in 1963 and so the manager of the Merrill Lynch Dallas branch said, ‘You guys go out and watch the parade. I’ll keep a skeleton crew here.’ They went out to watch the parade. A little while later, they all came in down in the dumps. And he said, ‘What’s the matter? You were supposed to watch the parade.’ And they said to him, ‘The parade got cancelled.’ And he said, ‘What do you mean?’ And they were here. And the parade was way up there. And they heard the sirens go loud. And the parade turned right.”
    “And this guy was a good manager. And he called the salesmen together. And he said, ‘Give me a good bullish reason to pull the president out of a parade.’ And nobody could think of one. And he said, ‘Give me a bearish reason.’ Nobody thinks, assassination. They were nowhere near there. They were 10 blocks away. But they start thinking, nuclear catastrophe, natural disaster, blah, blah, blah. They find 100 reasons to sell. He said, ‘Begin to sell for the discretionary accounts. Start calling our clients. And tell them, ‘We think something bad happened at the parade.'” 
    For Cashin, that Merrill Lynch manager was the perfect stock market Sherlock Holmes: Don’t just consider what you hear. Think beyond what happened.

    How do you tell a story about the stock market?

    By the time I met Cashin in 1997, he had been writing a daily column, Cashin’s Comments, for nearly 20 years. It was estimated to reach as many as 2 million people a day. It invariably began with an analysis of an important event: “On this date in 1918, the worldwide flu epidemic went into high gear in the U.S.”
    After a brief history lesson, he tied that event to the day’s market events: “Pre-opening Wednesday morning, U.S. stock futures looked like they might be coming down with the flu. Several earnings reports were less than glowing and some of the outlooks were cloudy.”
    Cashin never took a course in literary theory, but he understood that some stories were far more persuasive than others. He knew that condensed narratives with a clear storytelling arc were the most memorable, and therefore this was the most effective way to convey information.

    For Cashin, storytelling is only partly about facts: A series of Post-it notes on the wall, each with a separate fact about something going on in the market that day, is not a story. It’s how you connect the facts and weave it into a narrative that make it a story.
    “I have been fortunate enough over the years to be able to look at very complicated situations or problems and be able to reduce them to understandable items by using a story or a parable,” he once said to me.
    He not only uses stories, but he also anthropomorphizes the entire market: He routinely described the market as being “in a tizzy,” or that traders were “circling the wagons” to defend a particularly important level of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
    Let’s get back to the story about J.P. Morgan, Tiffany and price discovery.
    For Cashin, understanding what a stock was worth was not about a mathematical formula. It was about trying to understand what the other guy was willing to pay:
    “How can I, in a real estate transaction, in a stock transaction, whatever, delve into your mind and find out what will you really accept? You offer your house at three quarters of a million dollars. Is that really your price? How do I find out what the difference was? And Morgan, in his natural genius, figured out that he would offer the guy somewhat less, and if the guy took it, that was to Morgan’s advantage. And if the guy refused, then that was the price and he had to pay.”
    Cashin’s secret sauce was a natural gift for telling stories with a “dramatic arc” — that is, stories with rising action, a climax, falling action and a resolution. Even the short Tiffany story contains all these elements: The action rises when Tiffany’s man presents the stickpin to Morgan with a $5,000 asking price, and Morgan counters with a $4,000 offer. The climax occurs when Tiffany declines the counteroffer. The falling action happens when he sends the courier back with the note. The resolution occurs when Tiffany opened the box and found not the stickpin but a check for $5,000 and a note that said, “Just checking the price.”
    Cashin grasped that these kinds of stories pack more emotional resonance than stories that don’t have the dramatic arc, and that’s why people remember them.

    What Art Cashin taught me

    When you’re a journalist, it’s easy to look at the news as a pile of facts on a bunch of sticky notes — but this isn’t what makes a story. It’s how you arrange those facts into a narrative that matters. A good narrative has emotional resonance.
    Art Cashin understood that intuitively. He helped show me that the sticky notes weren’t nearly enough.

    Finally, a story about Art Cashin

    Art Cashin told stories for 60 years, but there were also a lot of stories about him. He spent a lot of time in bars.
    Years ago, Cashin gave me a copy of a menu from Eberlin’s, a restaurant founded in 1872 and a fabled Wall Street hangout, long since departed. The menu was from the mid-1960s: a martini or Manhattan was $1.20.
    On the list of entrées, there is this:
    SPAGHETTI (a l’Arthur Cashin) …………………………………………… $2.75
    I asked him one night at Bobby Van’s, his preferred watering hole late in his career, why was a spaghetti dish named after him?
    “It was a hangover cure,” Cashin told me. “Eberlin’s opened at 6:00 a.m., and all the guys who had been out drinking the night before came in for something to eat. My preferred breakfast was spaghetti in a red sauce, so they named the dish after me.”
    How Cashin managed to spend decades on the NYSE floor and in bars — and still released his nightly Cashin’s Comments — is a mystery to me.
    I know one thing: He refused to give me the recipe for Spaghetti (a l’Arthur Cashin). I’m not even sure his family knows.
    Excerpted from the book, “Shut Up and Keep Talking: Lessons on Life and Investing from the Floor of the New York Stock Exchange,” by Bob Pisani (Harriman House, 2022). More

  • in

    Tech stocks hit first all-time high since July

    Yuichiro Chino | Moment | Getty Images

    Technology stocks powered to new highs on Wednesday as the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite rallied 1% and investors poured into key software and megacap players.
    The Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) advanced 1.8%, rallying for its fourth straight day since mid-October and knocking out its previous high touched in July.

    Stock chart icon

    XLK hits new high

    The rally came amid a bounce in key software players, with Salesforce popping more than 9% after reporting strong earnings after the bell Tuesday. Adobe climbed 4%, and ServiceNow jumped more than 5%. GoDaddy, Oracle and Palo Alto Networks gained about 3% each.
    Mainstay megacap technology stocks also rallied, with Apple inching higher by 0.2% to a new record. Nvidia outperformed among the Magnificent Seven names, jumping more than 3%, while Amazon rose more than 2%. Alphabet and Microsoft rose at least 1% each. Meta Platforms, on the other hand, was flat.
    Marvell Technology was another significant gainer, surging 23% on the heels of a solid quarter. Within the semiconductor space, Broadcom and Arm Holdings added more than 1% and 0.7%, respectively.
    Other technology funds notching new highs included the First Trust Cloud Computing ETF (SKYY) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). More

  • in

    AI play Pure Storage soars 24% after touting it won a contract with an unnamed big tech company

    Low-angle view of sign with logo on facade of technology company Pure Storage in the Silicon Valley town of Mountain View, California, October 28, 2018. 
    Smith Collection/gado | Getty Images

    Pure Storage shares rallied after announcing a contract with an unnamed “top four” AI hyperscaler in tandem with its fiscal third-quarter results.
    The shares were up 22%.

    The data storage management company topped Wall Street’s estimates and offered up strong fourth-quarter guidance. Pure Storage also upped its previously forecasted full-year outlook.
    “We’re very pleased,” CEO Charles Giancarlo told CNBC’s “Closing Bell: Overtime” on Tuesday. “This is the first time ever where a hyperscaler, for their standard customer-facing storage, is going to be using a system vendor … and what we’re providing them is a very cost effective, high performance solution that can replace 90% of their storage.”
    Pure Storage refrained from sharing the name of the contracted hyperscaler company, but Wall Street analysts regarded news as a big win contributing to the post-earnings pop. A hyperscaler refers to the major cloud computing companies with massive data center that can rapidly size up to meet shifting storage and demands. Some of the key players with major cloud units include Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet and Meta.
    Piper Sandler upgraded shares to an overweight rating following the results. Shares are already up about 50% this year as investors seek out alternative methods to playing artificial intelligence trends and companies search for new ways to manage AI’s data-heavy needs.
    Analyst James Fish said the contract creates a “pure opportunity ahead” and “removes the “coinflip risk” previously price into the stock. Agreements with additional hyperscalers represent and additional potential upside catalyst for the stock, he wrote, moving to a $76 price target.

    “Hyperscaler interest in flash creates a secular tailwind for the space, as these vendors have historically represented 60-70% of [hard disk drive] shipments,” wrote James Fish. “AI throws ‘gas on the fire’ for utilizing” its storage operating system.
    Fish isn’t alone in his bullish take on the stock. Wedbush Securities analyst Matt Bryson called the news a “margin accretive” win for the company and upped his price target to $75.
    “We see no reason to shift our constructive view on PSTG, given the promising incremental revenue opportunity and our continued belief that PSTG offers a superior enterprise storage solution,” he wrote. More