More stories

  • in

    ‘A budget is a picture of what your money is doing,’ The Budgetnista says. Here’s where to start

    Register now for CNBC’s virtual Women & Wealth Event on March 5th, 2024

    Women and Wealth Events
    Your Money

    Having a strong budget can help you build financial wellness.
    “A budget is a picture of what your money is doing,” said Tiffany Aliche, also known as The Budgetnista.

    A young woman in her early 20s riding a chopper cycle.
    Karan Kapoor | The Image Bank | Getty Images

    Having a strong budget can help you build financial wellness.
    “A budget is a picture of what your money is doing,” Tiffany Aliche, also known as The Budgetnista, told CNBC during a Women & Wealth livestream.

    “It’s the foundation where you build your financial house. You have to understand what your money is doing,” said Aliche, a personal financial educator and author of “Get Good with Money.”

    More from Women and Wealth:

    Here’s a look at more coverage in CNBC’s Women & Wealth special report, where we explore ways women can increase income, save and make the most of opportunities.

    By examining what you spend and setting a budget, you may find the cash to build other financial safeguards, such as an emergency savings fund and retirement contributions.
    “You’re supposed to give each dollar a job,” said Sophia Bera Daigle, a certified financial planner and the founder of Gen Y Planning in Austin, Texas.
    It might also be good to think of your budgets from an annual perspective. Taking on a new, big expense like a car or house, or even experiencing the occasional emergency, can affect your monthly spending, said Daigle, who’s also a CNBC Financial Advisor member.

    Three steps to start a budget

    1. Make a list of expenses: The first thing to do is write a list of all the things you spend money on within a given month, said Aliche. “That’s step one.” Consider expenses that are fixed, such as your rent or car payment, and those that are variable, such as groceries and utilities. It can also help to list out expenses you don’t pay every month, such as annual memberships or quarterly taxes.

    2. Check your records: Next, see how those estimates match up to what you actually spend. Pull up your recent debit and credit card statements, and add up how much money you spent in a recent month.
    3. Figure out how your spending matches with your income: Once you know how much you spend on a monthly basis, find the difference from how much you earn. Aliche calls this “the tears and tissues” step because many people realize they are overspending.

    A lot of people hold onto the financial mistakes they made in their life, said Aliche. Don’t let the “tears and tissues” budgeting step derail you.
    “Shame shields solutions,” she said.
    To progress, lean on your community for emotional support and accountability. Figure out how to adjust your spending to bring your budget in line and give you room to meet your goals.
    Also, “understand that money is a team sport,” said Aliche. You need a “board of directors” to help you reach your goals, such as an accountability partner, an accountant and a financial advisor.
    SIGN UP: Join the free virtual CNBC’s Women & Wealth event on March 5 at 1 p.m. ET, where we’ll bring together top financial experts to help you build a better playbook, offer practical strategies to increase income, identify profitable investment opportunities and save for the future to set yourself up for a stronger 2024 and beyond. More

  • in

    Top Wall Street analysts recommend these 3 stocks for the long term

    Mateusz Slodkowski | SOPA Images | Getty Images

    The major averages are leaping to fresh highs, but attractive stocks with good growth prospects are still available for the picking.
    Wall Street analysts remain focused on the long-term prospects of stocks with solid growth potential. Investors can gain insights from the opinions of top analysts, who make recommendations after thorough research.

    Here are three stocks favored by the Street’s top analysts, according to TipRanks, a platform that ranks analysts based on their past performance.
    Nvidia
    Chip giant Nvidia (NVDA) is this week’s first pick. The company impressed investors with blockbuster quarterly results and better-than-expected revenue guidance, thanks to the huge demand for its products due to the artificial intelligence frenzy.
    In reaction to the stellar results for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024, Goldman Sachs analyst Toshiya Hari reiterated a buy rating on NVDA stock and boosted the price target to $875 from $800. “Nvidia delivered against what was seemingly a very high bar with Data Center once again serving as the key growth driver,” he said.
    Hari anticipates that strong generative AI infrastructure spending and new product launches will power continued outperformance. The analyst expects Nvidia to benefit from robust demand and new product introductions, including the H200 GPU, ethernet-based AI networking solution Spectrum-X and the next-generation Data Center GPU platform B100.
    The analyst is modeling a greater than two-times year-over-year increase in Nvidia’s fiscal 2025 data center revenue. That’s even after the segment generated a greater than three-times surge in its top line in fiscal 2024. His optimism is backed by sustained growth in generative AI infrastructure spending by large cloud service providers and consumer internet companies, as well as increased AI development and adoption by enterprise customers and sovereign states.

    Hari ranks No. 61 among more than 8,700 analysts tracked by TipRanks. His ratings have been successful 68% of the time, with each generating an average return of 24.3%. (See Nvidia’s Stock Charts on TipRanks)
    Abercrombie & Fitch
    Next up is clothing retailer Abercrombie & Fitch (ANF). Earlier this year, the company raised its forecast for the fiscal fourth-quarter and full-year net sales, as well as its operating margin guidance. The revised outlook reflected net sales growth across regions in the holiday sales quarter, led by continued strength in the Americas.
    Ahead of the company’s Q4 results on March 6, Jefferies analyst Corey Tarlowe increased his price target to $149 from $120 and reaffirmed a buy rating on ANF stock. The analyst noted that while issuing the upgraded outlook in January, the company said that its women’s business is expected to deliver the strongest-ever Q4 performance.
    Tarlowe highlighted that Abercrombie & Fitch continues to gain market share both domestically and worldwide. Citing Euromonitor data, the analyst said that in the U.S., the brand moved up four spots to the 20th position for apparel, compared to 2022. Similarly, demand for ANF’s jeans and outerwear categories helped it climb two spots to the 55th position worldwide in 2023.
    Tarlowe added that while the company’s Hollister brand was under pressure last year, it recently returned to growth. The analyst expects market share gains for the Hollister brand in the days ahead.
    Commenting on the fiscal 2025 outlook, Tarlowe said, “We expect ANF will provide strong yet beatable guidance, which could be a positive catalyst for the stock.” Overall, the analyst sees further upside to ANF’s market share, sales and earnings.
    Tarlowe ranks No. 473 among more than 8,700 analysts tracked by TipRanks. His ratings have been successful 68% of the time, with each generating an average return of 15.5%. (See ANF’s Financial Statements on TipRanks)
    Walmart
    This week’s third stock pick is big-box retailer Walmart (WMT), which delivered better-than-expected fourth-quarter results. The solid performance was driven by upbeat holiday season sales and strength in the company’s e-commerce channel.
    Following the print, Goldman Sachs analyst Kate McShane reaffirmed a buy rating on WMT stock and raised the price target to $193 from $180.
    She noted that Walmart’s operating income growth accelerated in the fourth quarter, fueled by the company’s alternative revenue sources, including advertising, marketplace and fulfillment services. Lower fulfillment costs also enhanced operating income.
    McShane highlighted that Walmart expects its top-line growth to be supported by its international business. In particular, the company anticipates that continued strength in India, Walmex (WMT’s unit in Mexico and Central America), and China will drive about 75% of its international growth over the next few years.
    “We see top-line support from continued market share gains, store investments (remodels and new stores/clubs), and growth of alternative revenue streams,” said McShane.
    Overall, she is bullish on Walmart and thinks that it is well-positioned to continue to drive strong earnings growth, thanks to its increasing market share due to the value deals and convenience offered by the retailer. The analyst also expects the company to improve its profitability, driven by the growth of higher-margin businesses and productivity benefits.
    McShane holds the 884th rank among more than 8,700 analysts tracked by TipRanks. Her ratings have been successful 62% of the time, with each generating an average return of 5.2%. (See Walmart Stock Buybacks on TipRanks) More

  • in

    Why millionaires may have already hit their Social Security payroll tax limit for 2024

    In 2024, up to $168,600 in earnings are subject to Social Security payroll taxes.
    Millionaires are set to hit that threshold in March and won’t pay into the program for the rest of the year.
    Here’s why some lawmakers and high-net-worth individuals think that should change.

    Ezra Bailey | Getty Images

    Most Americans can expect to pay Social Security payroll taxes throughout 2024.
    But for top earners with gross annual wage income of $1 million, March 2 marks the date at which they will stop paying into the program, according to the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

    The reason why those higher earners stop paying into the program a little more than two months into 2024 can be explained by the taxable maximum: the limit on earnings that are subject to the Social Security payroll tax.
    In 2024, that threshold is $168,600. Therefore, workers with wages equal to, or larger than, that amount stop paying into the program once they reach that point.

    How the Social Security payroll taxes work

    Social Security payroll taxes require workers to contribute 6.2% of their pay to Social Security, which is matched by their employer.
    Those who are taxed on the full $168,600 threshold will pay $10,453.20 to the program in 2024, with their employer also paying that same amount, according to the Social Security Administration.
    More from Personal Finance:78% of near-retirees failed or barely passed a basic Social Security quizWhy Social Security beneficiaries may owe more taxes on benefits62% of adults 50 and over have not used professional help for retirement

    The taxable maximum is adjusted each year based on changes in the national average wage index. The portion of workers earning more than the taxable maximum has been around 6% since the 1980s, according to the Bipartisan Policy Center.
    Yet, the percentage of total national earnings above the taxable maximum has increased, since income for top earners has grown faster than average wages, the Bipartisan Policy Center found. In 1977, the taxable maximum covered 90% of total national earnings. As of 2022, that had decreased to 82%.
    Social Security faces a looming funding shortfall. Without action from Congress, the program may only pay full benefits until 2034, at which point there will be a benefit cut of at least 20%, according to the program’s trustees.
    To fix that, Congress may choose to raise taxes, cut benefits or a combination of both.

    How Congress may raise taxes on the wealthy

    A recent Data for Progress poll finds 71% of all voters — Democrats, Republicans and independents — would prefer that Congress address the Social Security shortfall by raising taxes on wealthy Americans.
    Democrats on Capitol Hill have proposed requiring the wealthy to pay more into the program.
    That includes the Social Security 2100 Act — led by Rep. John Larson, D-Conn., with 183 Democrat co-sponsors in the House — that would reapply the payroll tax on those making more than $400,000 per year, as well as tax unearned investment income.
    Sens. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., are also leading a proposal that would make income more than $250,000 subject to the Social Security payroll tax, while also applying a 12.4% tax to business and investment income.

    The Democrats’ proposals would notably make benefits more generous while extending the program’s solvency.
    “The revenue that it produces is substantial,” Larson said of his proposal to lift the cap on the Social Security payroll tax for high earners making more than $400,000, in keeping with President Joe Biden’s pledge not to impose new taxes for people under that threshold.
    The tax increase would affect a smaller segment of wealthy Americans, while making it possible to enhance benefits for the first time in 50 years, Larson said.
    “Every town hall I have I usually start off by saying, ‘Well, first of all, raise your hand if you’re making more than $400,000,'” Larson said. “I’ve yet to have a hand go up in any room that I’ve been in.”
    In order for Congress to raise payroll taxes, Republicans would also have to approve the change, which would be a “difficult ask,” notes Emerson Sprick, associate director of economic policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center.

    Some wealthy Americans willing to pay more

    Some wealthy Americans — such as former BlackRock managing director Morris Pearl, who serves as chair of the board of the Patriotic Millionaires, a group of high-net-worth Americans — agree they should pay higher taxes.
    While working at BlackRock, Pearl remembers only paying into Social Security in his initial paychecks of the year.
    Now he lives mostly on investment income, which is subject to lower tax rates and not taxed for Social Security.

    That investment income is subject to capital gains and only taxed when realized. Those capital gains tax rates are lower than those for income produced from working, he noted.
    “People like me who get investment income should pay at least the same tax rates as people who work for a living,” Pearl said. “There’s actually no justification. I’m paying a lower tax rate than people who actually work all day.”
    Patriotic Millionaires is advocating for people who make more money to pay higher tax rates than people who make less money, he said. The group includes more than 200 high-net-worth individuals.Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    Activist Elliott calls for a big buyback at Mitsui Fudosan — 3 ways the company may create value

    Skyline of Tokyo, Japan.
    Jackyenjoyphotography | Moment | Getty Images

    Company: Mitsui Fudosan Co Ltd (8801.T)

    Business: Mitsui Fudosan is a Japan-based company engaged in the real estate business. It has five business segments. First, there’s the leasing unit, which is engaged in the leasing of office buildings and commercial facilities. Second, the allotment sale segment is involved in the sale of condos and houses for individual customers, as well as rental housing and office buildings for investors. There is the management segment, which includes property, brokerage and asset management. Mitsui Home is involved in new construction, reform and renewal businesses. Finally, the segment labeled “others” participates in the operation of hotels, golf courses and resort facilities, as well as the loan guarantee business.
    Stock Market Value: 3.869 trillion yen (4,144.00 yen per share). The stock also trades in the U.S. as an American depositary receipt under the ticker MTSFY.

    Stock chart icon

    Mitsui Fudosan shares in Japan over the past year

    Activist: Elliott Management

    Percentage Ownership:  2.5%
    Average Cost: n/a
    Activist Commentary: Elliott is a very successful and astute activist investor. The firm’s team includes analysts from leading tech private equity firms, engineers, operating partners – former technology CEOs and COOs. When evaluating an investment, Elliott also hires specialty and general management consultants, expert cost analysts and industry specialists. The firm often watches companies for many years before investing and has an extensive stable of impressive board candidates. Elliott has historically focused on strategic activism in the technology sector and has been very successful with that strategy. However, over the past several years its activism group has grown and evolved, and the firm has been doing more longer-term activism and creating value from a board level at a much larger breadth of companies.

    What’s happening

    Behind the scenes

    Elliott looks for three main criteria in an activist investment: (i) a high-quality business (ii) that trades at a discount to fair value and (iii) has a pathway to catalyze change and create shareholder value.

    Mitsui Fudosan is certainly a high-quality business. It is Japan’s preeminent real estate company. The quality of its buildings in terms of location and rent pricing are superb. Even as a commercial real estate company, Mitsui Fudosan does possess some brand power, which translates to premium pricing power. It has such a strong brand for quality that tenants pay a premium to be in their buildings.
    You do not need to do a ton of analysis to see that Mitsui Fudosan is also trading at a significant discount to fair value. Since January 2014, the company’s stock price has gone virtually nowhere. Over the same time, the Nikkei is up over 120%, and Mitsui Fudosan’s net asset value has almost tripled. The company has historically traded at a premium to its real estate value. Now it trades at a 33% post-tax discount. The value of its real estate, post-tax, is 5,700 yen per share, versus the stock trading at 3,850 yen. Plus, it has an 800-billion-yen stock portfolio, which includes a 550-billion-yen position in Oriental Land Company, or OLC, and successful fee-based real estate businesses (asset management, property management and brokerage) that brings its net asset value to 7,103 yen per share, implying an 84% discount in the price of the stock.
    The sources of this underperformance are likely unsurprising to those who have been monitoring recent activist campaigns in Japan from the likes of Elliott, ValueAct and Palliser, as well as the government and Tokyo Stock Exchange’s actions in recent years. Mitsui Fudosan is grappling with a low valuation and return on equity in absolute terms and relative to peers. Shareholder confidence is only further hindered by its governance practices. Mitsui Fudosan’s 800-billion-yen stock portfolio currently accounts for about a fifth of its market cap, but significantly dilutes the company’s ROE as it generates only 7 billion yen per year in dividend income. OLC accounts for about 70% of Mitsui Fudosan’s 800-billion-yen portfolio of cross-shareholdings, which debatably could make it the company’s largest asset. This is not only an inefficient allocation of capital, but also a risky one, to have such a great share of Mitsui Fudosan’s assets in a single publicly traded company that is one of the most expensive stocks in the TOPIX 100 on both a price-earnings basis and an enterprise value to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization basis. The Tokyo Stock Exchange has been encouraging companies to improve ROE and get above a one times book value valuation. Right now, Mitsui Fudosan has 0.65 times price to adjusted book value (for real estate companies) and the lowest ROE among its peers.
    This can be remedied by a board that practices better capital allocation and corporate governance – a board that gets back investors’ confidence that shareholder return will match portfolio growth. There are three things Mitsui Fudosan can do right away to create value for shareholders. First, it can sell its stake in OLC, which it has already started doing, but given the engagement by Elliott, not at a satisfactory pace. This is somewhat like Palliser Capital’s engagement at Keisei Rail, where the firm has called for a reduction of that company’s non-core 22% stake in OLC. Second, Mitsui Fudosan can sell 500 billion yen of non-core real estate holdings. Third, the company can use the proceeds to buy back shares and invest in new real estate developments as it creates the most value by redeveloping versus holding onto these assets. This will give Mitsui Fudosan a higher return on equity, which will lead to a lower cost of capital and a higher price to book value.
    This campaign is very similar to Elliott’s engagement at Dai Nippon Printing, another Japanese company, where the firm called for share repurchases to improve ROE and the accelerated disposal of certain real estate holdings and the company’s portfolio of cross-shareholdings. Shortly after the announcement of their engagement, Dai Nippon announced the largest share repurchase in its history: 300 billion yen or 30% of the company’s market cap.
    Despite Mitsui Fudosan’s corporate governance situation – receiving very low governance scores from Institutional Shareholder Services, having only one-third of the board comprised of independent directors and having a strange two-year term structure – there is some optimism to be had here. There is no large controlling shareholder of Mitsui Fudosan, a relatively low amount of cross-shareholdings (approximately 8%), and current president and CEO Takashi Ueda has been vocal in his commitment to boosting shareholder returns and capital efficiency, as well as his desire to churn real estate assets.
    Ken Squire is the founder and president of 13D Monitor, an institutional research service on shareholder activism, and the founder and portfolio manager of the 13D Activist Fund, a mutual fund that invests in a portfolio of activist 13D investments.  More

  • in

    Immigration is ‘taking pressure off’ the job market and U.S. economy, expert says

    Foreign-born workers made up 18.6% of the civilian labor force in 2023, up from 15.3% in 2006, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data.
    While immigration poses some challenges, it’s a net benefit to the U.S. economy, economists say.
    Without foreign-born labor, the U.S. labor pool would shrink because of lower birth rates and an aging workforce, making it harder to finance programs such as Social Security.

    Pixelprof | E+ | Getty Images

    The share of immigrants in the U.S. labor force has steadily increased for more than a decade, and that growth is poised to continue — a trend economists say benefits the American workforce and economy.
    In 2006, 15.3% of the civilian labor force was made up of “foreign-born” workers, or those born outside the U.S., according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. That share hit a record 18.6% in 2023.

    Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, said the increase in foreign-born workers is “taking pressure off the economy.”
    “In fact, it’s probably one reason why the economy grew so strongly last year,” he said.
    U.S. gross domestic product, a measure of economic output, grew by 2.5% in 2023, beating expectations and increasing from 1.9% in 2022.

    The growth in foreign-born workers comes amid a contentious immigration policy debate in the U.S.
    In mid-February, House Republicans impeached U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, whom they blame for perceived shortcomings in border security. He now faces the prospect of a Senate trial.

    Meanwhile, cities are trying to absorb an influx of people arriving at the U.S.-Mexico border. In December, the U.S. Border Patrol reported almost 250,000 encounters with migrants crossing into the U.S. from Mexico. That marked a monthly record, though that number fell by half in January, according to federal data.

    U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas holds a press conference on Jan. 08, 2024 in Eagle Pass, Texas. 
    John Moore | Getty Images News | Getty Images 

    “The present migrant crisis is quite unprecedented, both in scale, in the diversity of the nationalities that are coming to the border, and the impact it’s having not only on the border states but in the states and cities inside the country,” Muzaffar Chishti, senior fellow at the Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan immigration policy think tank, recently told CNBC.

    Foreign-born workers in the U.S. labor force

    In 2023, about 31.1 million workers out of the 167.1 million in the U.S. labor force were foreign-born, on average. The remainder were “native-born” workers, those born in the U.S. Immigrants’ share of the labor force has increased since 1996, when the Bureau of Labor Statistics began collecting such data.
    Most are here legally: In 2021, 4.6% of U.S. workers were unauthorized, a share that’s stayed in a “narrow range” since 2005, according to the Pew Research Center.

    More than 3.7 million immigrants joined the U.S. labor force between 2020 and 2023, on average — a 13.7% increase. Meanwhile, 2.6 million native-born workers joined the labor force over the same period, a 2% increase.

    Why immigration is a ‘net benefit for the economy’

    The labor force is the sum of people ages 16 and older who have jobs or are unemployed and actively looking for work.
    A growing population and labor force are key components of a healthy economy and the nation’s ability to pay its bills, economists said.
    In simple terms, more workers generate more goods and services. A larger number of people earning paychecks means more consumer spending, the lifeblood of the U.S. economy. More people paying income tax on earnings boosts tax revenues at a time of growing U.S. budget deficits, and helps prop up social programs such as Social Security and Medicare, which are funded by payroll taxes and facing a shortfall.

    The problem is that native-born U.S. households are having fewer children and the baby boom generation is aging out of the job market, economists said. Absent immigration, such dynamics would cause a long-term shrinking of the U.S. population and labor force, while social programs would require greater tax revenue to support more retiring seniors.
    The Congressional Budget Office, or CBO, a nonpartisan federal agency, predicts U.S. deaths will exceed births starting in 2040, at which point immigration will account for all population growth.
    “When you just consider the native-born population, we’re seeing very little labor force growth because of the aging population and low birth rates,” said Jack Malde, senior policy analyst at the Bipartisan Policy Center.

    Immigrant workers tend to be younger, too, helping counterbalance the U.S.’ aging workforce.
    About 91% of immigrants age 16 or older who arrive in the U.S. from 2022 to 2034 will be under age 55, according to recent projections by the CBO. By comparison, that would be true for just 62% of the overall U.S. adult population.
    Given the needs of the U.S. workforce, immigration has been “a net benefit for the economy,” said Malde, who specializes in immigration and workforce policy.
    More from Personal Finance:Pessimism about job market may not be warrantedWhy millennials’ retirement outlook isn’t rosyThis popular paycheck service is ‘payday lending on steroids,’ says expert
    The CBO estimates the U.S. labor force will grow by 5.2 million people from 2023 to 2034, largely due to “a surge in immigration” that began in 2022 and will continue through 2026. As a result, gross domestic product will be about $7 trillion higher and revenues $1 trillion larger than they would have been otherwise, it said.
    “More workers means more output, more income, and that in turn leads to the higher revenue,” Phillip Swagel, CBO director, said of those projections during a House hearing in February.  

    Immigration has helped put a lid on inflation

    A U.S. Border Patrol agent patrols the gap in the U.S.-Mexico border fence on Feb. 23, 2024 in San Diego, California. 
    Qian Weizhong/VCG via Getty Images

    Immigrant workers have also helped put downward pressure on pandemic-era inflation by easing a shortage of workers, economists said.
    Job openings surged to record highs in 2021 and 2022 as the U.S. economy reopened. The ready availability of jobs led businesses to compete for talent by raising wages at their fastest pace in decades; higher labor costs pressured businesses to raise prices, stoking inflation.
    In economic parlance, the labor market was “tight.”
    “Reopening of borders in 2022 and easing of immigration policies brought a sizable immigration rebound, which in turn helped alleviate the shortage of workers relative to job vacancies,” Evgeniya Duzhak, regional policy economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, wrote in a 2023 paper.

    When immigration may not be ‘such a good deal’

    While a larger immigrant workforce raises overall GDP and tax revenue, those measures may not be the best barometers of economic impact, said Steven Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies, a group advocating for tighter immigration controls.
    “If that’s your goal, immigration is good policy,” Camarota said. “If your goal is to increase per capita GDP, that’s a very different question.”

    U.S. agents escort asylum applicants down to the U.S. side of the bridge on April 1, 2020 at the Paso del Norte International Bridge in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico.
    Paul Ratje | Afp | Getty Images

    A Center for Immigration Studies analysis of Census Bureau data found that labor force participation among 25- to 54-year-old U.S.-born men without a high school diploma declined 5 percentage points, to 70%, from 2000 to 2023.
    It fell 6 percentage points, to 84%, for those with a high-school diploma over that time, but fell only 2 points, to 94%, for college-educated men, the analysis found.
    Camarota said immigration — along with factors such as globalization, weaker unions and a stagnant federal minimum wage — suppressed wages and made it harder for native-born men without college degrees to find jobs, keeping them on the sidelines and causing their labor force participation to decline. Foreign-born workers provide businesses with an easy labor supply, leading policymakers not to care as much about the U.S.-born groups being left behind, he said.
    “For society, [immigration] is not such a good deal,” Camarota said.

    ‘No evidence’ immigrants are taking American jobs

    A worker at a restaurant in Los Angeles on Nov. 2, 2023.
    Eric Thayer/Bloomberg via Getty Images

    The extent to which immigration may be keeping U.S.-born men without college degrees on the sidelines is unclear, Malde said. There are other reasons why their labor force participation may have declined long-term, he said: automation and technology reducing the demand for low-skilled labor; economic shifts away from manufacturing and toward service-oriented jobs, which often require higher educational attainment; and changing social norms.
    The prime-age labor force participation rate of U.S.-born men without a college degree “grew at a record pace in each of the last two years and is above its pre-COVID trend,” according to the Economic Policy Institute, or EPI, a left-leaning think tank.
    In other words, the economy is both absorbing immigrants and generating job opportunities for U.S.-born workers, the institute said. The idea that immigrants are “taking all our jobs” is “deeply misguided,” EPI researchers wrote in a recent analysis.

    The U.S. unemployment rate has been below 4% for two years, hovering near record lows. It was an average 3.6% for U.S.-born workers in 2023, the lowest rate on record, EPI said.
    “The labor market is tight as a drum,” especially for the types of lower-paid jobs many immigrants take, Zandi said.
    “There’s just no evidence at this point in time that immigrants are taking American jobs,” Zandi added. “They’re jobs that are simply going unfilled.”

    How immigration affects wages

    A 2017 meta analysis of economic research on immigration conducted by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine suggests the impact of immigration on the overall U.S.-born wage “may be small and close to zero,” particularly when measured over a period of 10 years or more.

    There’s just no evidence at this point in time that immigrants are taking American jobs. They’re jobs that are simply going unfilled.

    Mark Zandi
    chief economist at Moody’s Analytics

    However, evidence for certain “subgroups” of the workforce, especially those most likely to compete with immigrants, is somewhat mixed, the analysis found. For example, some studies suggest “sizable negative wage effects on native high school dropouts,” though there are “still a number of studies that suggest small to zero effects,” it said.
    There’s also a “sizable” concentration of immigrants in jobs that require high education and skill levels, such as computer software developers, accountants and physicians, the paper noted. In these jobs, “the evidence is stronger, though still inconclusive” that immigrants are pushing up wages “modestly,” it said.

    Immigrants are ‘substantial job creators’

    Luis Alvarez | Digitalvision | Getty Images

    Immigrants also launch new businesses at far higher rates than the overall U.S. population, according to research published in 2020.
    The study — authored by researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, University of Pennsylvania, Northwestern University and the U.S. Census Bureau — found immigrants in the U.S. workforce to be “substantial job creators” with an 80% higher “entrance rate into entrepreneurship” compared with native-born individuals. It examined data on more than 1 million firms founded between 2005 and 2010 that survived for at least five years.
    “Overall, the findings suggest that immigrants appear to ‘create jobs’ (expand labor demand) more than they ‘take jobs’ (expand labor supply) in the U.S. economy,” the study said. More

  • in

    IRS free tax filing program will open to all eligible filers in pilot states on March 12

    Smart Tax Planning

    Starting March 4, Direct File will expand testing to eligible users 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. But space will remain limited.
    The IRS plans to fully open Direct File to eligible taxpayers in pilot states on March 12 once testing concludes.
    The pilot states include Arizona, California, Florida, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming.

    Valentinrussanov | E+ | Getty Images

    The IRS has unveiled final testing for Direct File, the agency’s free tax filing program, with plans to fully open in 12 pilot states on March 12.
    Starting March 4, Direct File will expand final testing for eligible new users to begin federal returns, with availability 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, an IRS official said Friday.

    Space will remain limited during final testing and Direct File may close briefly if users exceed the day’s allotment. However, if you already started a return, you can use the software without interruption, the IRS said. You can learn more and check eligibility at directfile.irs.gov.
    After testing concludes, the IRS plans to fully open Direct File on March 12 to all eligible users in 12 pilot states, an IRS official said.

    More from Smart Tax Planning:

    Here’s a look at more tax-planning news.

    The pilot states include Arizona, California, Florida, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming. Alaska was originally included, but is no longer part of the pilot.
    “We will be working closely with the 12 pilot states in this test run, which will help us gather information about the future direction of the Direct File program,” IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel said in January.  
    While the Direct File pilot doesn’t support state returns, the software will guide users from Arizona, California, Massachusetts and New York to a state-supported tax-prep tool.

    Who qualifies for IRS Direct File

    You may qualify for Direct File with a simple, straightforward return, with limited types of income, credits and deductions, according to IRS officials.
    The pilot will only accept Form W-2 wages, Social Security retirement income, unemployment earnings and interest of $1,500 or less. This excludes filers with contract income reported via Form 1099-NEC, gig economy workers or self-employed filers.
    As for tax breaks, you must claim the standard deduction. Direct File only accepts a few credits: the earned income tax credit, child tax credit and credit for other dependents. The software also accepts deductions for student loan interest and educator expenses.

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    Household appliances don’t last like they used to, experts say. Consider this before calling a repair service

    Household appliances are becoming more modern and high-tech, but they don’t last like they once did, experts said. 
    Here are the best ways to save when it comes to replacing those big-ticket items.

    Customers look at appliances for sale at a Best Buy store in Miami, Florida, Oct. 8, 2021.
    Joe Raedle | Getty Images

    Sara Rathner didn’t want to replace her clothes dryer. But a part was clearly broken, causing the machine to make a high-pitched squealing sound every time she dried a load of laundry. 
    “We called an appliance repair company and he came and he replaced the component,” said Rathner, a travel and credit cards expert at NerdWallet who lives in Richmond, Virginia.

    However, the machine broke for the same reason again a few months later, and then again shortly after that. After the mechanic’s third visit, Rathner said he told her, “You need to stop calling me and just buy a new dryer. I cost you $250 every time I show up. One more visit, you could have just bought a new dryer.”
    More from Personal Finance:How home buyers and sellers can negotiate commissionsAspiring homeowners say they face two major obstacles93% of women are stressed about money

    ‘The appliance upgrade cycle has shortened’

    Household appliances are becoming more modern and high-tech, but — as Rathner found — they don’t last like they once did. 
    In fact, homeowners are purchasing large appliances, including washing machines, dryers, dishwashers and refrigerators, more often compared with 15 years ago, according to an analysis by Zonda Media, a housing market research and analytics firm.
    From 1995-2005, the average homeowner replaced appliances consistently every 12 to 13 years. Today it is every eight to nine years, noted Todd Tomalak, Zonda’s principal of building products research.

    At the same time, they are spending more than before.

    Homeowners spend about 34% more on appliances than they did 15 years ago, “above and beyond inflation,” Tomalak said.
    “Homeowners are purchasing appliances with more bells and whistles, but which become obsolete sooner and have more aspects to repair versus appliances years ago,” he said.
    “As a result, the appliance upgrade cycle has shortened.”
    As prices continue to rise while the quality of some products further degrades, shoppers will need to make trade-offs on how to spend their income, said chartered financial analyst Brian Laung Aoaeh, co-founder and general partner of Refashiond Ventures, a supply chain technology venture firm based in New York. 
    “There will be some [products] on which you don’t want to compromise on quality so you might be willing to pay a bit more … and then there might be certain things you decide ‘I don’t need this,'” he said.
    So, Aoaeh said, as a shopper, try to ask yourself this question: “In the things that you consume, where do you absolutely need the best quality?”

    How to save on big-ticket purchases

    While most consumers would struggle to cover a $1,000 unexpected expense, there are ways to spread out the cost of replacing a big-ticket appliance that breaks without warning. Otherwise, if your fridge or washing machine is on its last legs, seasonal discounts and credit card rewards can help you save.
    1. Buy Now, Pay Later may work in your favor: Buy Now, Pay Later programs can smooth out your budget, Rathner said. These loans cut big-ticket items into static monthly payments, but it can be tricky if you have more than one plan running at the same time. “If you don’t plan carefully, you might risk overdrawing your account because you’ve got too many of these plans going on at once.”
    2. Seasonal sales can help cut the cost: If you have the time to shop around and plan for this purchase instead of an emergency situation, you can take advantage of seasonal sales, Rathner said. “All major holidays have sales for things like appliances: July Fourth, Memorial Day, Labor Day, Black Friday, of course.”
    3. In-store financing may be available: “You can also see if the store that you’re purchasing the item from offers any sort of financing that might be favorable for you,” Rathner said. Some large retailers still offer old-school layaway programs, for instance.
    Retail credit cards can also give shoppers benefits such as discounts and early access to sales. Some include a “deferred interest” or a 0% interest retail card that gives customers roughly six to 12 months to pay off a big purchase. Make sure to pay off the item within the time frame; if not, you will be saddled with interest on the full amount you charged.
    4. Credit cards can offer perks: You might be able to reap the rewards if you use a credit card that offers benefits such as a sign-on bonus, which often requires the cardholder to hit a high spending minimum, said Rathner. “If it’s a sign up bonus that’s attainable to you and you have one of these major appliance purchases coming up anyway that you’ve been planning for, then the timing can work out in your favor,” she said. Make sure to pay off the card balance by the due date; otherwise, the high interest rate fees will be added on.
    Also, consider researching cards that offer warranties as a benefit: “That will add an extra year on top of the manufacturer’s warranty as well,” she said. Make sure the warranty covers the appliance you’re shopping for. More

  • in

    Many workers believe pensions are key to achieving the American Dream. But getting those plans back isn’t easy

    A shift from pensions to 401(k) plans has made it so retirement savings is a worker’s responsibility.
    Yet, new research finds most individuals say pensions are essential for achieving the American Dream.

    A United Auto Workers union member holds a sign outside the Stellantis Sterling Heights Assembly Plant to mark the beginning of contract negotiations in Sterling Heights, Michigan, on July 12, 2023.
    Rebecca Cook | Reuters

    Many Americans long for the days when companies guaranteed workers income in retirement.
    That includes Sara Schambers, a fourth-generation Ford auto worker and member of the United Auto Workers union, who saw her grandparents retire with financial security. But after obtaining a permanent position in 2012, the same benefits have not been available to her.

    “Without a pension and post-retirement health care, you have people leaving this company after 30 years’ service with nothing more than a, ‘Have a nice day, hope the stock market doesn’t crash,'” Schambers told Senate leaders during a hearing in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday.
    Ford did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

    More than three-quarters of Americans, 77%, say the unavailability of pensions is making it harder to achieve the American Dream, according to a new report from the National Institute on Retirement Security.
    Meanwhile, 83% say all workers should have a pension to be independent and self-reliant in retirement.

    How the move from pensions to 401(k)s affects workers

    Over the past four decades, nongovernment employers have been shifting from providing pensions, otherwise known as defined benefit plans, to defined contribution plans such as 401(k)s.

    Pensions typically pay lifetime retirement benefits based on factors such as an employee’s salary and years of service. The employer takes responsibility for the investments made on the employee’s behalf, including the risk as to whether adequate funds will be available to pay the benefits owed. Pension employees traditionally receive steady monthly checks once they retire, though plans may offer lump-sum distributions.
    More from Personal Finance:78% of near-retirees failed or barely passed a basic Social Security quizWhy Social Security beneficiaries may owe more taxes on benefits62% of adults 50 and over have not used professional help for retirement
    In contrast, 401(k)s and other defined contribution plans mostly require employees to oversee their contributions and investment selections. While employers may help with matching contributions or features that automatically nudge employees to save more, the amount of income employees may ultimately receive as income in retirement is unknown.
    With the shift from pensions to 401(k)s, the responsibility for saving for retirement has transferred from employers to workers.
    Yet, some research suggests workers still fare best when the responsibility for retirement savings falls on the employer.

    ‘Workers want to have the choice to retire or not’

    Most Americans, 79%, now say the U.S. is facing a retirement crisis, up from 67% in 2020, according to the NIRS.
    The median retirement savings for all households is just $39,000, according to Teresa Ghilarducci, professor of economics at The New School for Social Research and author of the book, “Work, Retire, Repeat: The Uncertainty of Retirement in the New Economy.”
    A lack of adequate retirement funding has forced many Americans to work longer.
    “Workers want to have the choice to retire or not, and they can only do that with good pensions,” Ghilarducci said at an NIRS event on Tuesday.

    Yet, others argue the switch to a defined contribution system has been successful in helping Americans build wealth.
    Americans have amassed $41.5 trillion in inflation-adjusted retirement assets, an increase of 330% over the past 35 years, noted Rachel Greszler, senior research fellow at The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank.
    “When not managed properly, defined benefit plans can end up like Ponzi schemes,” Greszler said at Wednesday’s Senate hearing.
    Neither Social Security nor multiemployer pensions can pay benefits as promised, she noted. Social Security’s trust funds face insolvency in the next decade, which may prompt across the board benefit cuts of more than 20% if Congress does not act sooner.
    To shore up Social Security, the average American household would have to pay at least $3,000 per year more in taxes, money that would better be invested in personal accounts, Greszler argued.
    At the Senate hearing, Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., pointed to another reason why a move to pensions may not necessarily be best for today’s workers. Those benefits offered by the federal government include a vesting period of five years, which may preclude workers who switch jobs frequently — or who are laid off by their companies — from participating. Defined contribution plans such as 401(k)s, however, are portable from job to job.

    A return to pensions?

    Some employers are considering a return to pensions, notably with IBM shifting from a 401(k) match to a defined benefit contribution.
    Yet, “only a handful” of other major companies would be likely to follow IBM’s lead to reopen their defined benefit plans, a recent analysis from the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College found.
    Still, that isn’t stopping Schambers, the auto worker, from hoping to have pensions reinstated in the next round of union contract negotiations.
    “Our next UAW contract expires in 2028,” Schambers said. “And we’re ready to fight like hell for real retirement security, for a pension and post-retirement health care.”Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More