More stories

  • in

    19 million people may qualify for free tax prep through the IRS this season. Here’s where they live

    Direct File, a free tax filing program from the IRS, fully opened in 12 pilot states on Tuesday.
    The U.S. Department of the Treasury estimates that one-third of federal income tax returns could use Direct File this season and 19 million taxpayers may currently be eligible.

    Artistgndphotography | E+ | Getty Images

    Estimated state-by-state eligibility

    The Treasury estimates that 19 million taxpayers may be eligible to use Direct File this season, with the following breakdown in each pilot state:

    California: 5.2 million
    Arizona: 690,000
    Florida: 2.4 million
    Massachusetts: 850,000
    New Hampshire: 200,000
    Nevada:480,000
    New York: 2.8 million
    South Dakota: 110,000
    Tennessee: 960,000
    Texas: 3.8 million
    Washington: 1.1 million
    Wyoming: 80,000

    The agency hopes to see 100,000 filings this season, according to a senior administrative official. That works out to roughly 0.5% of those eligible filers.

    IRS Free File returns up nearly 15%

    This season, the Direct File pilot is only available in 12 states, but most taxpayers also qualify for another option: IRS Free File.
    The program is a public-private partnership between the IRS and the Free File Alliance, a nonprofit coalition of tax software companies. There are eight Free File partners for 2023 federal filings and some include state returns.
    You can use Free File if your 2023 adjusted gross income was $79,000 or less. Free File also offers Fillable Forms for all income levels, which is the electronic version of a paper filing.

    It’s free, it’s easy to use and it’s available.

    Executive director of the Free File Alliance

    Some 70% of taxpayers, or roughly 100 million Americans, are eligible for Free File. “It’s free, it’s easy to use and it’s available,” said Tim Hugo, executive director of the Free File Alliance.
    While only 3% of taxpayers used the program last season, Free File returns (including Fillable Forms) are up nearly 15% through March 8 compared to the same week last year, according to Hugo.
    Other free tax filing options this season include Volunteer Income Tax Assistance, Tax Counseling for the Elderly and private company software. More

  • in

    Homebuyers need to earn 80% more than in 2020 to afford a house in this market. It’s not just due to high mortgage rates

    Factors beyond high mortgage rates are affecting housing affordability for many Americans, according to experts.
    The connection between housing costs and wages has been gradually separating over the years, according to C. Kirabo Jackson, an economist and member of the White House Council of Economic Advisers.
    Similarly, the number of new housing units built throughout the years has been declining, and the low supply is rooted in restrictive land-use and zoning regulations, according to experts.

    Skynesher | E+ | Getty Images

    Factors beyond high mortgage rates are affecting housing affordability for many Americans, according to experts.
    Almost four years ago, a household earning $59,000 annually could afford a new mortgage without spending more than 30% of their monthly income and with a 10% down payment, according to a recent report by Zillow Group.

    That is no longer the case today.
    While the typical household in 2024 makes about $81,000 a year, up from $66,000 in 2020, wages have not kept up with housing costs.
    “Since January of 2020, the typical mortgage payment on the typical home in the U.S. has nearly doubled,” said Orphe Divounguy, a senior economist at Zillow.
    Nowadays, potential homebuyers need to make about $106,500 a year in order to afford the typical home today, an 80% increase from January 2020, according to Zillow.
    More from Personal Finance:47% of parents still financially support adult childrenWhy can’t today’s young adults leave the nest?Why you’re more likely to be a homeowner if your parents were

    The connection between housing costs and wages has been gradually separating over the years, according to C. Kirabo Jackson, an economist and member of the White House Council of Economic Advisers.
    “Around the mid-’90s, you start to see housing prices sort of separate from median wages in a way that kind of made housing less and less affordable for people who are in the market,” Jackson said.

    More supply ‘helps keep prices down’

    Tight supply is another reason behind unaffordability. Fewer homes available on the market for would-be buyers keeps real estate prices elevated and, in some local markets, the shortage makes prices climb higher.
    The number of new housing units built throughout the years has been declining, and the low supply is rooted in restrictive land-use and zoning regulations, according to experts.
    “If we have a supply problem, we really need to have a supply solution,” Divounguy said.
    Land-use and building regulations across the country make it difficult in some markets to build new homes, Divounguy said.
    And the most important way to improve affordability is to construct more housing in the U.S, he said.

    We have a growing economy, we have a growing population. As your population grows, you have to build more housing to accommodate the growth and population

    C. Kirabo Jackson
    Member of the White House Council of Economic Advisers

    To increase housing supply, local policymakers would need to lower the barriers for builders by easing land-use and zoning regulations, which determine factors like the maximum height of a building or the minimum size of a lot, Jackson said.
    For example: Some local areas may say you can’t construct buildings more than three stories high in a particular area, which means high-rise buildings that could house about 100 people are out of the question.
    “Instead, you have to have a house that maybe has five people,” Jackson said. “The more supply you have helps keep prices down. So the more housing that you make available, the more that’s going to sort of ease price pressures.”
    While increasing the housing density in an area can boost affordability, land-use and zoning regulations, which inherently determines an area’s housing supply, is often decided at a local level, he said.

    “If you really wanted to expand the supply of housing, one of the most immediate ways one could do that would be to ease up on these zoning restrictions and allow the construction of affordable housing in areas that currently would not be allowed under local land-use rules,” Jackson said.
    Some areas have already begun to see a boom in new housing inventory due to relaxed zoning rules, according to Divounguy. Markets that allow builders to make smaller, attached homes as opposed to detached, single-family housing are seeing a surge in new construction, like markets in the South.
    “Markets that have more restrictive land-use, regulations, zoning rules are markets where you’re not seeing the type of new construction necessary to keep up with demand for housing,” Divounguy said.
    While local zoning rules are not under the federal government’s control, the administration is working toward local areas to be more flexible by providing financial incentives to help developers build more affordable housing, said Jackson.
    “We have a growing economy, we have a growing population. As your population grows, you have to build more housing to accommodate the growth and population,” Jackson said.

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    Equal Pay Day highlights an up to $1.2 million salary shortfall for women of color

    Women and Wealth Events
    Your Money

    Today, a woman just starting out will earn $399,600 less over a 40-year career compared to men, according to a new analysis by the National Women’s Law Center.
    For Black women, this lifetime wage gap totals $884,800, and for Latina women, the losses are $1,218,000.
    “Employers need to take a hard look at what’s happening within their walls and take action to remedy it,” says Jasmine Tucker, the National Women’s Law Center’s vice president of research.

    Equal Pay Day is a reminder of the persistent income inequality between men and women.
    As it stands, women earn just 84 cents for every dollar earned by men, according to an analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data by the National Women’s Law Center.

    “When you look at the cent number, it looks like it’s small,” Jasmine Tucker, the National Women’s Law Center’s vice president of research, said of the shortfall. “I don’t think that does justice to the actual losses.”
    This year, March 12 marks just how far into the new year full-time female workers have to keep working to make what their male counterparts typically made in just the previous year, also known as the gender pay gap.
    Over time, the inequality is magnified. Based on today’s wage gap, a woman just starting out will lose $399,600 over a 40-year career, according to the National Women’s Law Center.

    More from Women and Wealth:

    Here’s a look at more coverage in CNBC’s Women & Wealth special report, where we explore ways women can increase income, save and make the most of opportunities.

    The pay gap worsens significantly for Black and Latina women.
    For Black women, the lifetime wage gap adds up to $884,800, and for Latina women, the losses total $1,218,000, the nonprofit advocacy group found.

    That also means that Black and Latina would have to work full time, year-round to nearly age 80 or 90 to make what white non-Hispanic men are paid by age 60, Tucker said, “or they forfeit over $1 million in losses.”

    Why the gender pay gap persists

    There is no single explanation for why progress toward narrowing the pay gap has mostly stalled, according to a separate report by the Pew Research Center. Some contributing factors: Women are still more likely to pursue careers in lower-paying industries, and to take time out of the labor force or reduce the number of hours worked because of caretaking responsibilities — often referred to as the “motherhood penalty.”
    Systemic bias has also played a role.
    Women of color remain underrepresented in higher paying occupations.
    “Even when Black women are in the same roles, they are paid less,” said Ofronama Biu, principle research associate at the Urban Institute.
    In addition to wages, there is also a benefit gap, Biu said.
    “Pay is important but there are other things that impact people’s economic security,” such as retirement accounts, paid time off and health care, she said.

    What it takes to achieve progress

    No “one thing” is going to close the wage gap, Tucker said. However, research shows that there are some measures that can help, including the recent rise in pay transparency laws enacted by states and municipalities.
    The idea is that pay transparency will bring about pay equity — equal compensation for work of equal or comparable value, regardless of worker gender, race or other demographic category.
    “Employers do not need to wait for states to pass laws to put some of these tools into practice,” Tucker said. “Employers need to take a hard look at what’s happening within their walls and take action to remedy it.”

    “Companies need to be open about what they are doing and their plans — it really starts and ends at the corporate level,” Lauren Sanfilippo, senior investment strategist at Bank of America’s Chief Investment Office, also said.
    Yet, “to wait around for those indicators is not the way to find progress fastest,” Sanfilippo added.
    In the meantime, Sanfilippo advises women to keep a close eye on workplace practices and pay. “You want to be paid according to what you are doing and what you are offering the firm.” More

  • in

    IRS free tax filing program launches in 12 pilot states. Here’s what to know

    IRS Direct File is now fully open in 12 pilot states for “simple tax situations,” according to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. 
    The Treasury estimates the Direct File pilot could cover about one-third of federal tax returns or 19 million taxpayers, and hopes 100,000 filers will participate this season.

    miniseries | Getty

    After weeks of testing with roughly 1,500 returns, Direct File, a free tax filing program from the IRS, is now fully open in 12 pilot states, according to the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
    While the pilot focuses on “simple tax situations,” the Treasury estimates the pilot could cover about one-third of tax situations for 19 million taxpayers. The Spanish language version opens later on Tuesday at 1 p.m. ET. 

    “Dozens of countries have provided free tax options to their citizens for years,” Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Wally Adeyemo said during a press call on Monday. “American taxpayers who want to file their taxes for free directly with the IRS should have that option.”
    More from Personal Finance:Trump vs. Biden: What a presidential election rematch could mean for your taxesTax pros brace for ‘tidal wave’ of crypto tax scrutiny from the IRS. What investors need to knowIRS targets wealthy ‘non-filers’ with new wave of compliance letters
    Treasury officials hope at least 100,000 taxpayers will participate in the Direct File pilot for 2023 filings as the agency makes future decisions about the program, Adeyemo said.
    Within five years, the program could save the average filer $160 per year, or a collective $11 billion annually including tax prep fees and time, according to a report from the Economic Security Project released Monday.

    IRS Direct File pilot states

    The IRS Direct File pilot states include Arizona, California, Florida, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming. Alaska was originally included but is no longer part of the pilot.

    The soft launch and limited rollout were intentionally designed to capture data to make improvements and decisions for the future, a senior administrative official said.
    Direct File pilot doesn’t support state returns, but the software will guide users from Arizona, California, Massachusetts and New York to a state-supported tax-prep tool.

    Direct File pilot open to limited filers

    You may qualify for Direct File with a simple, straightforward return, with limited types of income, credits and deductions, according to IRS officials.
    The pilot will only accept Form W-2 wages, Social Security retirement income, unemployment earnings and interest of $1,500 or less. This excludes filers with contract income reported via Form 1099-NEC, gig economy workers or self-employed filers.
    To qualify, you must claim the standard deduction, which is $13,850 for single filers and $27,700 for married couples filing jointly for 2023.
    Direct File only accepts a few credits: the earned income tax credit, child tax credit and credit for other dependents. The software also accepts deductions for student loan interest and educator expenses.

    Scrutiny of IRS Direct File

    The Direct File pilot launch comes amid pushback from the private tax filing industry. There has also been scrutiny from some Republicans who have questioned the agency’s authority to create the program.
    When asked about Direct File during a House Ways and Means hearing in February, IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel said the agency has “a responsibility and an authority to offer taxpayers different approaches for how to meet their tax obligation.”
    Taxpayers have several free filing options this season, including IRS Free File, Volunteer Income Tax Assistance, Tax Counseling for the Elderly and private company software. More

  • in

    Biden proposes expanding free community college across the U.S.

    President Joe Biden proposed expanding access to free community college across the U.S., and other initiatives to make higher education less costly.
    In the president’s budget for fiscal 2025, Biden called for increasing the amount of Pell Grants and establishing a “Reducing the Costs of College Fund.”

    Woman with hands raised in the classroom
    Fg Trade | E+ | Getty Images

    President Joe Biden has proposed expanding free community college across the U.S., and other initiatives to lower higher education costs.
    The plans, announced Monday as part of Biden’s $7.3 trillion budget for fiscal 2025, face slim chances of becoming law this year with Republicans in control of the House.

    Still, the budget reflects the president’s policy priorities as he seeks reelection in November.
    “With these investments, we can deliver an excellent education to all students, improve learning conditions, build pathways to college and careers, and increase postsecondary education affordability and access,” U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona said in a statement.
    More from Personal Finance:Many think pensions key to achieving American DreamHow to avoid unexpected fees with payment apps’Ghosting’ gets more common in the job market
    After the Supreme Court blocked Biden’s sweeping student loan forgiveness plan in June, his administration has explored all of its existing authority to leave people with less student debt. It has now canceled debt for almost 3.9 million borrowers, totaling $138 billion in relief, through fixes to forgiveness programs that borrowers historically had trouble accessing.
    The president’s budget builds on those efforts by further addressing the student loan crisis and offering more ways for people to get through their schooling without going into debt.

    Biden’s presumptive Republican opponent, former President Donald Trump, called for slashing the U.S. Department of Education’s budget during his term in the White House.
    In contrast, Biden is requesting additional funding for the agency — $82.4 billion for 2025, a $3.1 billion increase from 2024 — to subsidize educational costs for many Americans.

    Bigger Pell Grants, fee cuts on student loans

    Biden’s budget calls for increasing the discretionary maximum Pell Grant to $8,145, a $750 raise from the current level.
    The federal Pell Grant program, signed into law in 1965, is one of the largest sources of financial aid available to college students. More than 6 million undergraduate students received the grants in 2020, and over 90% of recipients come from families with household incomes below $60,000, according to higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz.
    “We fully support the administration’s commitment to increasing the Pell Grant,” said Jaylon Herbin, director of federal campaigns at the Center for Responsible Lending.
    “This move signifies a crucial step toward enhancing access to education for all borrowers, but especially borrowers of color in underserved communities,” Herbin said.

    The president’s budget also calls for eliminating origination fees on federal student loans, and $2.66 billion to support student loan borrowers as they return to repayment, including improvements to loan servicing.
    Origination loan fees range roughly from 1% to 4% of the total amount borrowed.
    “[An origination fee] not only reduces the amount of loan funds applied to their college bill, but it also adds expense and confusion to the process,” said Elaine Rubin, director of corporate communications at Edvisors.

    Expand free community college

    The president’s budget would expand free community college across the U.S. through a federal-state partnership.
    “The free community college proposal is a big development,” Kantrowitz said. Subsidized community college, he added, “will make college much more affordable for low-income students and help them transition quickly into good-paying jobs.”

    In addition, Biden proposes providing two years of subsidized tuition for students from families earning less than $125,000 and enrolled in certain schools, including a historically Black college and university and a tribally controlled college and university.
    Biden also wants to establish a $12 billion “Reducing the Costs of College Fund,” which would create a new $7.2 billion program to provide states with matching funds to offer at least 12 free postsecondary credits to students in certain career-connected programs.

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    Trump vs. Biden: Where 2024 presidential candidates stand on Social Security, Medicare

    Former President Donald Trump suggested he may consider cutting “entitlements” in a CNBC interview on Monday.
    Meanwhile, President Joe Biden flatly rejected Trump’s suggestion, while releasing a budget proposal aimed at strengthening Social Security and Medicare.
    “Social Security is on the ballot this November,” one advocate for the programs said.

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump watches a video of President Joe Biden playing during a rally for Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) at the Miami-Dade Country Fair and Exposition on November 6, 2022 in Miami, Florida.
    Joe Raedle | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    Former President Donald Trump and current President Joe Biden issued opposing views on the future of Social Security on Monday.
    While Trump suggested the possibility of cutting “entitlements” on CNBC’s “Squawk Box,” Biden issued a 2025 budget proposal that states, “No benefit cuts.”

    “Make no mistake: Social Security is on the ballot this November,” Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, an advocacy group for expanding the program, said in a statement.
    More from Personal Finance:Millionaires may have hit their 2024 Social Security payroll tax limit78% of near-retirees failed or barely passed a basic Social Security quizMany Americans believe pensions are key to achieving the American Dream
    Social Security and Medicare face funding shortfalls that will require benefit cuts within the next decade if Congress does not act. Social Security’s combined funds will be depleted in 2034, at which point 80% of benefits may be payable, the program’s trustees projected last year. The Medicare hospital insurance fund, which covers Medicare Part A, may be depleted in 2031.

    What we know about Trump’s stance on Social Security

    In interviews during his campaign, Trump has generally rejected the idea of changes to Social Security, which he has said would hurt senior citizens.
    However, in a Monday interview with CNBC, Trump said that reining in spending on the program could be one way to improve the government’s budget.

    “There is a lot you can do in terms of entitlements, in terms of cutting and in terms of also the theft and bad management of entitlements,” Trump said.
    Trump did not elaborate on the potential changes he had in mind.

    President Biden responded to the interview by posting on X: “Not on my watch.”
    It’s not the first time Trump has suggested cuts to Social Security.
    In 2020, Trump proposed a budget as president that included an estimated $71 billion in cuts to the program, with changes some advocates feared would make it more difficult to stay on disability benefits. Also in 2020, during the Covid-19 pandemic, Trump suggested a payroll tax cut aimed at putting more money in workers’ paychecks. However, such a policy would reduce the tax income Social Security and Medicare rely on.
    In recent interviews, Trump has mostly rejected the idea of changing Social Security.
    “You don’t have to touch Social Security,” Trump said during a recent Fox News town hall, suggesting other changes could come before cuts that would hurt senior citizens.

    How Biden aims to strengthen Social Security

    During the State of the Union on Thursday, President Biden promised to protect both Social Security and Medicare from cuts.
    “If anyone here tries to cut Social Security or Medicare or raise the retirement age, I will stop them,” Biden said, while touting plans to “make the wealthy pay their fair share” through additional payroll taxes on people earning more than $400,000.
    On Monday, Biden reaffirmed his commitment with the release of a fiscal year 2025 budget proposal that states, “No benefit cuts.”
    “The president opposes policies that cut benefits, as well as proposals to privatize Social Security,” the budget states.
    Instead, the budget calls for extending the solvency of both Social Security and Medicare by requiring high income workers to pay taxes toward the program on more of their income.
    Biden calls for improving Social Security benefits, as well as Supplemental Security Income benefits, for seniors and people with disabilities, particularly those with low incomes.

    The president also proposes increased funding for the Social Security Administration with the goal of increasing access to benefits. That includes $15.4 billion for the agency’s operations, an almost 9% increase from its fiscal year 2023 funding level.
    “The chronically underfunded agency has been struggling to provide proper customer service — including field office closures, long wait times on SSA’s 1-800 phone line, and excessive delays in disability insurance hearings,” Max Richtman, president and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, said in a statement.
    “It is past time for SSA to receive truly adequate funding, and the president’s budget represents a major step in that direction,” he said.
    Like Biden, Democrats on Capitol Hill have proposed bills to raise taxes on the wealthy and enhance benefits. Meanwhile, House Republicans last week advanced a budget that calls for a bipartisan commission to evaluate Social Security and Medicare’s solvency issues.
    Social Security has been criticized for problems with overpayments that have led beneficiaries to owe money back to the government.
    Democrats have argued the underfunded agency needs an increase in funds to address those problems. Republicans, on the other hand, have urged the Social Security Administration to better use the resources already available to the agency. More

  • in

    You can still buy a sofa for $399 — here’s why you may not want to

    A decadeslong effort to mass produce furniture at a lower cost has led to a decline in quality, overall, experts say.
    What was lost along the way was “repairability,” says CoCo Ree Lemery, a professor of furniture and industrial design at Purdue University. “When something reaches the end of its lifespan, it just dies.”
    Here’s how to find pieces that will stand the test of time, while keeping affordability in check.

    Hispanolistic | E+ | Getty Images

    Don’t expect the sofa you buy today to go the distance.
    “In the last 15 years, there’s been a shift to disposable furniture,” according to David Koehler, chairman of Johnny Janosik, a furniture retailer with stores in Delaware, Maryland and Virginia.

    For most consumers, that’s okay. Attitudes have changed, said Koehler, who is a member of the Home Furnishings Association.
    More from Personal Finance:Household appliances don’t last like they used toEven high earners consider themselves ‘not rich yet’Gen Z, millennials are ‘house hacking’ to become homeowners
    Young adults, especially, are less likely to be homeowners and more likely to move often. They’re also more likely to feel financially strapped and less willing to splurge on furniture, Koehler said.
    However, “the old expression, ‘you get what you pay for,’ is very true in the furniture industry,” he said.

    Changes to materials reduced ‘repairability’

    A decadeslong effort to mass produce furniture at a lower cost has led to a decline in quality, overall, experts say.

    The rapid expansion of the middle class after World War II made owning a home easier and drove demand for less expensive home furniture, according to CoCo Ree Lemery, a visiting professor of furniture and industrial design at Purdue University.
    “We were introduced to plywood. Then we really saw a material degradation,” Lemery said of the rise in popularity of the composite material made from gluing together thin pieces of wood veneer.
    Medium density fiberboard, which is another form of engineered wood commonly known as MDF, followed, and then particle board, or recycled wood chips fused together, along with synthetic foams and glues to keep production more affordable.
    In each case, substitute materials were used to make furniture that was less expensive but also less durable than the solid wood pieces that previous generations bought.

    Increasingly, furniture is also now shipped and sold in flat-packs, which makes transporting it cheaper. In some cases, customers assemble the furniture themselves, keeping labor costs down.
    But at every stage, there are trade-offs. “The more that it breaks down into small pieces, the quality is going to be less, period, end of story,” Lemery said.
    What was lost along the way was “repairability,” she said. Now, “when [furniture] reaches the end of its lifespan, it just dies.”
    Mark Schumacher, CEO of the Home Furnishings Association, referred CNBC to Koehler for comment.

    How to find quality furniture

    Still, consumers are more likely to prefer pieces that are affordable, even though they may not stand the test of time.
    “With the rise of direct-to-consumer, now customers are only buying based on aesthetics and trends,” Lemery said. “In that atmosphere, of course you are going to go for the cheapest price tag.”
    The furniture industry was not immune to supply chain issues brought on by the Covid-19 pandemic, which caused prices to spike due to high demand and low supply.
    Yet, furniture has not experienced the same price increases that other consumer goods have over the years, including cars and housing. “In the 1980s, you could buy a sofa for $399. You could probably still buy a sofa for $399,” Koehler said.

    But choosing a more expensive piece isn’t necessarily a guarantee of better quality, Koehler said.
    “To find quality, you need to do your research,” he said. “In our industry, it’s important to see it, feel it, touch it, so you know what you are getting.”
    Often, the telltale signs are in the construction, Koehler said. For example, open a dresser and look for dovetail drawers — a traditional joinery technique of interlocking wood — rather than pieces that are glued or stapled together. You can also check the furniture description to see whether it is made from solid wood or particle board under a veneer.

    Best ways to finance a furniture purchase

    When shopping around for new furniture, make sure you’re getting a piece for a good value and, ideally, save for it in advance, said certified financial planner Carolyn McClanahan, founder of Life Planning Partners in Jacksonville, Florida.
    If you need to spread out the purchase of a big-ticket piece of furniture, consider a no-interest financing deal from the retailer or manufacturer that you know you can pay off within the agreed timeframe.
    “They might give you a year interest free. Make sure that you have the ability to pay it off in that year because if you don’t, the interests are huge, huge, huge,” said McClanahan, who is also a CNBC Financial Advisor Council member. 
    1. Buy Now, Pay Later: Similar to buying a new household appliance, a Buy Now, Pay Later program can help you spread out the cost of a pricey piece of furniture into monthly payments. Make sure to plan accordingly because if you have more than one BNPL running at the same time, you risk “overdrawing your account,” Sara Rathner, a credit cards expert at NerdWallet, recently told CNBC.
    2. In-store sales, financing options: Furniture retailers may offer major discounts on certain products for seasonal sales, Rathner said. In-store financing options might also be available, such as layaway programs or retail credit cards with a deferred interest. Make sure you are able to pay off the product by the end of the agreed timeframe. Otherwise, high interest rate fees will stack on top of your dues.
    3. Two types of loans: Personal loans can be an option. To qualify, you must have “decent credit,” said McClanahan. Unlike personal loans, a secured loan requires collateral to receive the money. It’s similar to buying a car: “If you don’t pay for the car, then [the bank] repossesses your car,” she said. In a personal loan, “they can’t reclaim your soul.” However, the interest in a secured loan is a bit lower because they have the collateral. 
    Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

    Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    47% of parents still financially support adult children, study finds. Here’s how much they spend

    Nearly half of parents with a child over 18 provide them with at least some financial support, according to a recent report.
    For parents, however, supporting grown children can be a substantial drain at a time when their own retirement security is at risk. 

    Many argue it’s harder today for young adults to make it on their own.
    In addition to soaring food and housing costs, millennials and Generation Z face other financial challenges their parents did not at that age. Not only are their wages lower than their parents’ earnings when they were in their 20s and 30s, after adjusting for inflation, but they are also carrying larger student loan balances, recent reports show.

    So parents are stepping in to help. From buying food to paying for a cell phone plan or covering health and auto insurance, nearly half, or 47%, of parents with a child over 18 provide them with at least some financial support, according to a report by Savings.com.
    These parents are shelling out $1,384 a month, on average, the report found.
    More from Personal Finance:3 ways Gen Zers can build creditWhy can’t today’s young adults leave the nest?Gen Z, millennials are ‘house hacking’ to become homeowners
    By other measures, young adults are doing well.
    Compared with their parents at this age, Gen Zers are more likely to have a college degree and work full time — particularly women, who are not only achieving increasing levels of education but also earning more.   

    And yet, 61% of adult children still living at home don’t contribute to household expenses at all, Savings.com found. 

    ‘Create boundaries and figure out a balance’

    For parents, however, supporting grown children can be a substantial drain at a time when their own retirement security is at risk. 
    In fact, 58% of parents said they have sacrificed their own financial security for the sake of their adult children, a jump from 37% of parents a year earlier, Savings.com also found.
    Parents should “have a good financial plan for themselves, then budget how much they can give their kids,” said Carolyn McClanahan, a certified financial planner and founder of Life Planning Partners in Jacksonville, Florida.

    McClanahan, who also is a member of CNBC’s Advisor Council, suggests parents set parameters and a time frame before providing financial support that takes into account their own retirement plans or other financial goals, such as paying off debt or saving for long-term health-care costs.
    “You need to create boundaries and figure out a balance.”
    As a general rule, you should set aside money for your retirement and emergency fund first, she said.
    Isabel Barrow, the director of financial planning at Edelman Financial Engines, advises clients to agree on a deal: Parents will offer some financial support to their children, if their kids are also making decisions that support their own financial future in other ways, such as contributing 10% of their salary to a 401(k) at work.
    “If they have income, they have a job, they can save. That needs to be their commitment to you,” Barrow said.
    Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube. More