Investing

Amazon, Google, Microsoft and Paramount are among a long list of companies with recent layoffs.
Financial advisors share tips on how to best spend your money after a job loss.

Fg Trade | E+ | Getty Images

Amazon, Google, Microsoft and Paramount are among a long list of companies with recent layoffs. Many of those unemployed workers are now trying to figure out how to get by without a paycheck.
CNBC spoke to financial experts on the best way to use your financial resources while unemployed.

“Job loss is extremely traumatic, but it is important to remember that it is not the end of the world,” said Michele Evermore, a senior fellow at The Century Foundation.

Assess your severance

Some newly unemployed workers are offered a severance package by their former company, which often means their paychecks are continued for some period or that they receive a lump sum at their termination. Certain benefits, such as health insurance, may also get extended.
More from Personal Finance:Here are some ways to maximize your financial aid for collegeWith mortgage rates high, renting is less expensive than buyingHere’s how to avoid unexpected fees with payment apps
These funds can delay when you need to dig into your savings, said certified financial planner Cathy Curtis, founder and CEO of Curtis Financial Planning in Oakland, California.
“If the person was fortunate enough to get a severance package, they can draw on that first,” said Curtis, who is also a member of CNBC’s Financial Advisor Council.

File for unemployment

In some states, it can take weeks for your unemployment claim to be approved, so the sooner you file, the better, Evermore explained.
“As soon as someone becomes unemployed, the next website they should visit should be the state unemployment application site,” she said.
You are typically supposed to start receiving your benefit within 21 days after you’ve applied, but Evermore said, “states are still a little slower than they were pre-pandemic, so the wait could be a little longer.”
To help you budget, determine how much you might receive and for how long, experts say. The average weekly benefit ranges greatly between states, Evermore said. Most states pay benefits for 26 weeks.

Job loss is extremely traumatic.

Michele Evermore
a senior fellow at The Century Foundation

Whether or not the package affects your unemployment benefits depends on your state’s rules, Evermore said. Just be sure to accurately report the amount and timing of any severance to your unemployment agency both when you apply for the benefits and on your continued weekly claims, she said.
For example, the agency in New York says people who were ineligible for jobless benefits because of their severance package can apply for the aid once their severance runs out and if they haven’t been rehired yet.
The Employment Security Department in Washington state, meanwhile, says severance payments do not usually affect your benefits.

Adjust your budget

After a job loss, you should make sure you know your exact monthly expenses, said certified financial planner and physician Carolyn McClanahan, founder of Life Planning Partners in Jacksonville, Florida.
“If they don’t, they should immediately figure it out and what can be cut until their financial situation is stabilized,” said McClanahan, who is also a member of CNBC’s Financial Advisor Council.
Curtis added that it would be wise to do without “discretionary expenses such as dining out and travel until a new job is found.”

Strategize which savings to tap, in what order

Hopefully you have an emergency savings fund to draw from, Curtis said. Unlike the money in, say, your retirement account, these savings are usually in a high-yield savings account or another place that’s easy to access “and very liquid,” she said.
If it takes a while to find another job, the next best place from which to pull money is any taxable, nonretirement investment accounts, Curtis said. While this might land you with a larger tax bill, you’ll avoid the penalties that come with digging into retirement savings earlier than allowed.
You may even be able to avoid taxes. If you have any securities that have had a loss, you could look to first sell those and circumvent capital gains, Curtis said.

If you don’t have securities in the red, you should try to sell assets that you’ve held for a year or longer, as these usually are taxed at more favorable rates than those you’ve owned for just months or less, she added.
“Tapping into retirement accounts should be a last resort as withdrawals can have penalties and will be taxed at higher ordinary income tax rates,” Curtis said. “Plus, it disrupts the compounding growth of retirement savings.”Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

Companies have shed thousands of jobs in 2024 in an effort to cut costs.
For those who have recently been laid off, the good news is the job market is still strong.
But career experts say you may have to take a new approach to successfully land your next role.

Westend61 | Westend61 | Getty Images

As thousands of layoffs make headlines, experts say there is a silver lining — a resilient job market.
But to find your next position faster as companies cut costs, you may have to take a new approach.

In January, companies cut a record 82,307 positions, the highest number of job cuts announced since January 2009, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas, an outplacement and business and executive coaching firm.
The top sectors affected by those job losses were finance and technology. Companies such as Citigroup, Google and Amazon have been affected.

The fresh wave of technology layoffs has prompted Holly Lee, a career coach and former recruiting leader for Amazon, to reposition her approach with clients.
“Now I have basically transitioned my entire model into coaching people to calm down,” Lee said.
“I work really hard in building their confidence,” she said.

To successfully land a new position faster, it helps to adapt, Lee said.

Don’t fixate on one kind of role

For workers with years of experience at a big tech name, their goal is often to find another similar position.
“Don’t just be stuck in, ‘I want to work for a big tech company,’ and that’s it,” Lee said.
With that mindset, you run the risk of ignoring opportunities with other companies that are hiring.
More from Personal Finance:Here are some ways to maximize your financial aid for collegeWith mortgage rates high, renting is less expensive than buyingHere’s how to avoid unexpected fees with payment apps
“There’s a ton of startups preparing to go IPO or pre-IPO companies that are still trying to build talent,” Lee said.
Job search tools can help amplify your search, according to Scott Dobroski, a career trends expert at Indeed.
By updating your profile on job search sites with your skills, experience and the positions you are seeking, you may find roles you would not have otherwise considered. For example, bank tellers may find their skill set also makes them suitable for sales executive positions.
“We’ve seen some people get jobs quicker and earn salaries of upwards of $30,000, $35,000 or more because they’re finding a job that way,” Dobroski said.

Bring your authentic self

Having the right social networking skills can make a big difference in finding work faster, according to Lee.
For some people, that means shaking off their naturally introverted tendencies to become more extroverted.
“Now’s the time to bring more of your authentic self,” Lee said.

It helps to perfect your sales pitch for when you do land an interview or get face time in front of a prospective employer, according to Vicki Salemi, a career expert at Monster.
Look at your recent performance reviews to help highlight achievements and skills you want to boast about, Salemi said. Be sure to note transferrable skills, such as having the ability to lead with empathy, handle deadline-driven work or operate under a company’s budget.

Be persistent

When unemployed, it can be easy to sit back and wait for prospective employers to reach out. But those who are most successful in their job search are the most proactive, Lee said.
If you’re not finding luck in your search, don’t be afraid to try a new approach, she said.
“You can’t sit back and expect changes by doing the exact same thing that hasn’t worked,” Lee said.Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

The Coca-Cola Company logo is being displayed at a New Year’s fair in Kyiv, Ukraine, on December 31, 2023.
STR | Nurphoto | Getty Images

Investors looking to enhance their portfolio returns can opt for a combination of growth and dividend stocks.
Choosing the right dividend stock by analyzing multiple factors can be complex for investors. However, recommendations from analysts can help inform investors’ research and guide them toward lucrative dividend stocks from companies with strong fundamentals.

Here are three attractive dividend stocks, according to Wall Street’s top experts on TipRanks, a platform that ranks analysts based on their past performance.
Coca-Cola
This week’s first dividend pick is beverage giant Coca-Cola (KO). Earlier this month, the company reported fourth-quarter revenue that surpassed expectations and earnings that were in line with analysts’ estimates. Higher prices helped Coca-Cola offset the weakness in North American volumes.
Coca-Cola paid $8 billion in dividends in 2023 and made net share repurchases worth $1.7 billion. The company, recently announced a nearly 5.4% increase in its quarterly dividend per share to $0.485. This increase marked the 62nd consecutive year of dividend hikes for the company. With an annual dividend of $1.94 per share, KO stock offers a yield of more than 3%.
Following the Q4 2023 results, RBC Capital analyst Nik Modi reiterated a buy rating on Coca-Cola stock with a price target of $65. The analyst noted that KO’s organic revenue growth was fueled by the impressive rise in pricing and resilient volumes, with the company exceeding the organic growth expectations for five out of six segments.
While higher marketing investments and a strong dollar weighed on Coca-Cola’s earnings, the analyst expects the company’s fundamentals to remain robust this year.

“We believe the company’s latest restructuring and organizational design changes will facilitate better allocation of resources, which will ultimately lead to better share gains and white space expansion,” said Modi.   
Modi ranks No. 615 among more than 8,700 analysts tracked by TipRanks. His ratings have been profitable 60% of the time, with each delivering an average return of 6.3%. (See Coca-Cola Insider Trading Activity on TipRanks) 
Blue Owl Capital
Next up is Blue Owl Capital (OWL), an asset manager with assets under management of more than $165 billion as of Dec. 31, 2023. On Feb. 9, the company announced its quarterly results and declared a dividend of 14 cents a share, payable on March 5. The company also announced about a 29% hike in its annual dividend for 2024 to 72 cents per share (18 cents a share per quarter). Blue Owl has a dividend yield of 3.1%.
In reaction to the print, Deutsche Bank analyst Brian Bedell reaffirmed a buy rating on OWL stock and increased the price target to $20 from $17. The analyst thinks that the company’s fourth-quarter results were “very good,” with a strong revenue beat, driven by improved management fees and higher-than-expected transaction fees.
Following the 25% growth in fee-related earnings, or FRE, in 2023, the analyst thinks the company is well-positioned to deliver at least a 25% FRE increase this year as well. The analyst highlighted management’s commentary about reaching the dividend goal of $1 per share by 2025, with a line of sight into generating an additional $1 billion in revenue.
“Most importantly, after raising the dividend by 29% to $0.72 p.s. [per share] for 2024, mgmt portrayed high visibility into generating stronger earnings power to support a dividend near $1.00 p.s. in 2025 (we model $0.91),” said Bedell.
Bedell holds the 593rd position among more than 8,700 analysts tracked by TipRanks. His ratings have been profitable 54% of the time, with each delivering an average return of 8.5%. (See Blue Owl Hedge Fund Activity on TipRanks)
Chevron
Oil and gas giant Chevron’s (CVX) earnings declined last year due to lower oil prices compared to the elevated levels seen in 2022. Nonetheless, the company impressed investors with significant shareholder returns of $26.3 billion. This amount included about $14.9 billion in share buybacks and $11.3 billion in dividends.
Further, Chevron, a dividend aristocrat, announced an 8% rise in its quarterly dividend to $1.63 per share, payable on March 11. The stock has a yield of 4.2%.  
Noting Chevron’s Q4 beat on adjusted earnings per share, Goldman Sachs analyst Neil Mehta reiterated a buy rating on the stock with a price target of $180. The analyst highlighted management’s constructive update on the Tengizchevroil, or TCO, expansion project in Kazakhstan.
While share repurchases in the first quarter of 2024 could be limited due to the ongoing Hess deal, Mehta remains bullish about Chevron’s “leading capital returns profile, where we expect CVX to return ~$29.3 bn in 2024/2025, representing ~10% yield vs US Major peer average of ~8%.”
Aside from Chevron’s attractive capital returns profile, Mehta is also optimistic about the company’s 2025 upstream volume and cash flow inflection as the TCO project ramps.
Mehta ranks No. 351 among more than 8,700 analysts tracked by TipRanks. His ratings have been successful 62% of the time, with each delivering an average return of 10.7%. (See Chevron Financials on TipRanks)
 Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

Smart Tax Planning

After a record high 8.7% Social Security cost-of-living adjustment for 2023, beneficiaries may owe more taxes on their benefit income.
Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have proposals to eliminate those levies.

Alistair Berg | Digitalvision | Getty Images

A record 8.7% cost-of-living adjustment helped Social Security beneficiaries stave off the effects of inflation in 2023.
But as they file their federal returns this tax season, they may be surprised to find more of their benefit income has been taxed.

Capitol Hill lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have put forth proposals to eliminate those levies on benefit income altogether.
Rep. Angie Craig of Minnesota, who is championing a bill with fellow Democrats, calls the idea a “win-win.”
“It’s a tax cut for seniors and a way to ensure more Americans can depend on the Social Security benefits they’ve earned,” Craig said in a statement.
But experts say eliminating taxes on Social Security benefit income may be a tough ask as the program faces a funding shortfall.

COLAs go up, but tax thresholds stay the same

The 8.7% cost-of-living adjustment, or COLA, for 2023 — prompted by record high inflation — was the biggest annual increase in four decades. The Social Security Administration estimated it would put an extra $140 per month on average in beneficiaries’ monthly checks.

The year before — 2022 — the cost-of-living adjustment was 5.9%.
Both increases were substantially higher than the 2.6% average annual increase to benefits over the past 20 years due to record high increases in prices.
As inflation has started to subside, a 3.2% cost-of-living adjustment for 2024 has come closer to that average.

More from Smart Tax Planning:

Here’s a look at more tax-planning news.

But even as recent annual adjustments spiked, the thresholds at which Social Security benefits are taxed have stayed the same.
Up to 85% of Social Security benefit income may be taxed.
The levies are applied to combined income, or the sum of half your benefits and total adjusted gross income and nontaxable interest.
If your combined income as an individual tax filer is between $25,000 and $34,000 — or between $32,000 and $44,000 if married and filing jointly — you may pay taxes on up to 50% of your benefits.
If your combined income is more than $34,000 and you file individually — or if you’re married and file jointly and have more than $44,000 in combined income — up to 85% of your benefits may be taxed.

More may owe taxes on Social Security income

This year, some Social Security beneficiaries may see their benefits taxed for the first time, according to the Senior Citizens League. A 2023 survey from the nonpartisan senior group found 23% of respondents who had been receiving Social Security for three or more years paid taxes on their benefits for the first time that year.
That share may increase this tax season following the 8.7% cost-of-living increase in 2023, according to the group.
But just how much more beneficiaries will pay in taxes due to the “unusually large COLA” for 2023 depends on their personal circumstances, said Tim Steffen, a certified financial planner and the director of advanced planning at Baird.

“Whenever income is up, it’s reasonable to expect your tax liability to be as well, although that really depends on other income and deductions [you] might have between last year and this year, too,” Steffen said.
Over time, because Social Security’s combined income thresholds don’t change, more beneficiaries can expect to pay taxes on the money from their monthly checks.
“At a certain point in the future, essentially everyone will be paying taxes on their Social Security benefits,” said Emerson Sprick, associate director of economic policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center.

Proposals aim to eliminate ‘double tax’

Some lawmakers have decried a so-called “double tax” that those levies on benefits impose after beneficiaries paid into the system through payroll taxes.
“This is simply a way for Congress to obtain more revenue for the federal government at the expense of seniors who have already paid into Social Security,” Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., who is sponsoring the Republican bill, said in a statement.
While both sides of the aisle have proposals to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits, they differ on how to pay for it.
Craig’s proposal — called the You Earned It, You Keep It Act — would pay for the change with transfers from Treasury general funds and applying the Social Security payroll taxes to earnings over $250,000. Currently in 2024, the first $168,600 in employee wages is subject to the Social Security payroll tax.
The bill, which has seven Democratic co-sponsors, would help increase Social Security’s ability to make benefit payments on time and in full by 20 years, according to an analysis by the program’s chief actuary.
Massie’s proposal — called the Senior Citizens Tax Elimination Act — would pay for the cost of eliminating taxes on benefits through government fund transfers outside of the Social Security trust funds. The proposal, with 30 Republican co-sponsors, would not include any tax increases.

Not a ‘high probability of legislative success’

The idea of nixing taxes on Social Security benefits will likely be popular with the retirees who pay them. More than half of seniors — 58% — said the income thresholds for taxes on Social Security benefits should be updated to today’s dollars, according to a Senior Citizens League survey conducted last year.
But it may be tougher to get the change passed by lawmakers.
“They’re really popular messaging bills,” Sprick said. “But that doesn’t translate to a high probability of legislative success.”
Authorizing general fund transfers to shore up Social Security is “deeply unpopular” in Congress, Sprick said.
Social Security’s tax policies are already progressive, with just around 40% of beneficiaries owing levies on their benefit income, he noted.
Because of that, other changes to help the bottom 60% who do not owe taxes — such as providing higher income replacement for lower earners or a guaranteed level of minimum benefits — may better help those retirees, Sprick suggested. More

Smart Tax Planning

If you sold a home in 2023, part of your profit could be subject to capital gains taxes.
Single homeowners can shield up to $250,000 of home sales profit from capital gains taxes and married couples filing jointly can exclude up to $500,000, provided they meet IRS rules.
You can also increase the home’s “basis,” or purchase price, by tacking on the cost of certain improvements.

Witthaya Prasongsin | Moment | Getty Images

Despite a slump in U.S. home sales, many homeowners made a profit selling property in 2023. Those gains could trigger a tax bill this season, depending on the size of the windfall, experts say.
In 2023, home sellers made a $121,000 profit on the typical median-priced single-family home, according to ATTOM, a nationwide property database. That’s down from $122,600 in 2022.  

But sometimes profits exceed the IRS limits for tax-free gains and “it’s a shock” for sellers, said certified public accountant Miklos Ringbauer, founder of MiklosCPA in Los Angeles. 

More from Smart Tax Planning:

Here’s a look at more tax-planning news.

Still, “the tax laws were written to encourage homeownership,” and many sellers qualify for a tax break, Ringbauer said.  
Single homeowners can shield up to $250,000 of home sales profit from capital gains taxes and married couples filing jointly can exclude up to $500,000, provided they meet IRS eligibility.
If you’ve owned the property for more than one year, profits above $250,000 and $500,000 are subject to long-term capital gains taxes, levied at 0%, 15% or 20%, depending on your 2023 taxable income. (You calculate “taxable income” by subtracting the greater of the standard or itemized deductions from your adjusted gross income.)

Who qualifies for the capital gains exemptions

There are strict rules to qualify for the $250,000 or $500,000 capital gains exclusions, Ringbauer warned. 

The “ownership test” says you must own the home for at least two of the past five years before your home sale — but that’s only required for one spouse if you’re married and filing jointly.

There’s also a “residence test,” which requires the home to be your primary residence for any 24 months of the five years before sale, with some exceptions. (The 24 months of residence can fall anywhere within the five year period, and it doesn’t have to be a single block of time.)
Both spouses must meet the residence requirement for the full exclusion.
A partial exclusion may also be possible if you sold your home because of a workplace location change, for health reasons or for “unforeseeable events,” according to the IRS.
Generally, you can’t get the tax break if you received the exclusion for the sale of another home within two years of your closing date.

How to reduce your home sale profits

If your capital gain exceeds the IRS exclusions, it’s possible to reduce your profits by increasing your home’s original purchase price or “basis,” according to certified financial planner Assunta McLane, managing director of Summit Place Financial Advisors in Summit, New Jersey.
You can increase your home’s basis by adding certain improvements you’ve made to the property to “prolong its useful life,” according to the IRS.
For example, you could tack on the cost of home additions, updated systems, landscaping or new appliances. But the cost of repairs and maintenance generally don’t count.

Of course, you’ll need detailed records to show proof of capital improvements, because “estimates don’t work when it comes to an audit,” Ringbauer said.
After a home sale, the IRS receives a copy of Form 1099-S, which shows your closing date and gross proceeds. But you need paperwork to prove any changes to your home’s basis.
Failing to keep home improvement records throughout ownership is a “common mistake,” McLane said. More

Several factors may affect your path toward homeownership — one may be your parents.
Homeowner parents are more likely to help young adult children with down payments, help them save money and even show them how to achieve homeownership, experts say.

Maskot | Digitalvision | Getty Images

Several factors may affect your path toward homeownership — one may be your parents.
“If your parents are homeowners, you’re more likely to be a homeowner,” said Susan M. Wachter, a professor of real estate and finance at The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

Homeowner parents are more likely to directly assist their children with down payments through gifted money or loans, create multigenerational households to help young adults save money and even pass along firsthand knowledge of how to achieve homeownership, experts say.
More from Personal Finance:New FAFSA ‘loophole’ lets grandparents help pay for collegeWith mortgage rates remaining high, renting is less expensive than buyingA flood insurance quirk makes basements a bad place to keep your stuff
The tendency follows a broader underlying phenomenon or “an intergenerational transmission of status,” said Dowell Myers, a professor at the University of Southern California’s Sol Price School of Public Policy.
“If your parents are more educated, you’re more educated. If a parent’s more educated and they have more money, then you have more money,” said Myers, whose research focuses on linking demographic data with housing trends.

‘The bank of mom and dad’ helps fund down payments

In 2023, about 23% of first-time buyers used a gift or a loan from friends or family for the down payment of their house, according to the National Association of Realtors.

Separately, Zillow’s chief economist Skylar Olsen said in August on CNBC’s “Last Call” that 40% of first-time homebuyers source money “from the bank of mom and dad” to make their down payments, up from one-third pre-pandemic.
“Some of that is hard-won savings,” she said. “The other part is, say, a gift from family and friends.”

“Intergenerational wealth is clearly associated with homeownership,” said Wachter. If a parent is a homeowner, they are more likely to assist with their kid’s down payment, she said.
In fact, a young adult’s homeownership rate increases with household income and the effect is compounded with the parent’s homeownership status, according to a 2018 report by the Urban Institute, an economic and social policy think tank based in Washington, D.C.
If your parent is not a homeowner, “then you are less likely to have intergenerational wealth or transferred gifts from your parent for a down payment, which has become quite important as down payments have increased,” she said.
Myers agreed: “As prices rise, down payments have to get bigger. No one can save up $100,000; that’s just not realistic.”

The lack of affordable housing keeps Gen Zers at home

Nearly a third, 31%, of adult Gen Zers, or those born in 1996 or later, live at home with their parents or a family member because they can’t afford to buy or rent their own place, a report by Intuit Credit Karma found.
The lack of affordable housing options is pushing young adults to live with their parents, and multigenerational living can help young people build savings to become homeowners, Wachter said.
But it’s harder for those with parents who are not homeowners: “Renter households are often precluded from bringing more people into their home. As a homeowner, you have more space, flexibility; you’re able to do so,” she said. “There’s this intergenerational propensity to be renters.”

Having homeowner parents is ‘like a 5 percentage point bonus’

Young adults with homeowner parents are more likely to become homeowners themselves because they can obtain more information about the mortgage application process directly from their parents, the Urban Institute found.
“Because the parents are so knowledgeable about homeownership, they’re more likely to encourage their kids to do it and show them how to do it,” Myers said. “It’s like a 5 percentage point bonus by having parents who are homeowners.”

Renter parents may express more “sour grapes” about the idea of owning a home, he said: “If they didn’t do it, they’re not going to talk it up.”
Cultural factors during someone’s upbringing can also influence their potential home buying and renting activity. “It’s a valid component,” Myers said.
If a young adult grew up with homeowner parents, they are more motivated to achieve the same status because they know the benefits firsthand. More

Stock trader Gregory Rowe (R) works on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange during morning trading on February 14, 2024 in New York City. 
Michael M. Santiago | Getty Images News | Getty Images

After a brief respite, the Magnificent 7 stocks have again hit new highs on the heels of Nvidia’s blowout earnings: They now again comprise about 30% of the S&P 500. Throw in the remainder of the top 10 stocks (Berkshire Hathaway, Lilly, and Broadcom) and the concentration rises to about 33% of the S&P 500.
At the recent ETF conference in Miami Beach, Registered investment advisors were eager for advice on how they might get their clients to stop pestering them to invest more money in the Magnificent 7.

There was much handwringing about the dangers of over-concentration. RIAs worried that just like they get blamed for not being in the Mag 7 rally with sufficient zest, they will get clobbered by clients blaming them when (and if) they bubble bursts.
The hope of the RIAs was the market rally would broaden out.
Fat chance. That was two weeks ago, during a brief lull in the relentless march of Nvidia and the Magnificent 7.
But Nvidia’s earnings have killed the last hope of the “diversify” crowd. The numbers speak for themselves:
Major Sectors YTD

Van Eck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) up 20% (25% Nvidia!)
Roundhill Magnificent 7 ETF (MAGS) up 14% (14% Nvidia!)
S&P 500 up 5% (4% Nvidia!)
S&P 500 Equal-Weight ETF (RSP) up 2%
Is over-concentration really a risk?
On the surface, it sure seems that way. The comparisons are getting silly.
At the ETF conference, Dimensional Fund Advisors noted that the Magnificent 7 stocks were now just as large as the entire combined stock markets of Japan, UK, Canada, France, Hong Kong/China combined:
Magnificent 7 vs. The World
(MSCI All Country World Index weighting)
Entire U.S. stock market: 63%
Japan, UK, Canada, France, Hong Kong/China combined: 17.5%
Magnificent 7: 17%
Source: Dimensional Funds
That seems crazy, no? And yet, it’s not at all unusual to see concentration like this in prior periods. And it’s mostly around tech.
High concentration levels have happened often
It’s true concentration has risen in the last 10 years. As late as 2015, the top 10 stocks in the S&P 500 were only 17.8% of the index, according to a 2023 study by FS Investments.
But that was a low point. Most of the time, the concentration of the top 10 stocks has been far higher.
For example, in the mid-1960s the concentration of the top 10 was over 40% of the S&P 500.
The domination of the so-called “Nifty 50” stocks (which included IBM, American Express, General Electric, Polaroid and Xerox) in the 1960s and early 1970s regularly kept the concentration of the top 10 stocks over 30%.
It slowly declined over the next 20 years, settling between roughly 17% and 20% of the market capitalization of the S&P 500 between the 1980s and the late 1990s.
It shot up again during the dotcom and Internet boom, which again pushed the concentration of the top 10 to over 25% in the late 1990s.
It’s not just a U.S. issue
Other countries like China, France, and Germany have far higher concentration in the top 10 names than the U.S.
The broadest China ETF, the iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) has over 600 stocks. But the top 10 stocks, which include Tencent, Alibaba and Baidu, comprise 42% of the entire ETF.
Same with Germany: The iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) has 57% of its weighting in 10 stocks, with 22% in just two stocks, SAP and Siemens.
Same with the United Kingdom: The iShares MSCI UK (EWU) has 50% in the top 10 holdings, with nearly a quarter in three stocks, Shell, AstraZeneca, and HSBC.
Same with France: The iShares MSCI France (EWQ) has 57% in the top 10 with just two companies — LVMH and Total — comprising 20% of the weighting.
And same with Canada: The iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index (XIU) has 45% in the top 10 holdings.
Concentration of top 10 stocks in country indexes
China 42%
Germany 57%
UK: 50%
France: 57%
Canada 45%
U.S.: 33%
Concentration has helped U.S. and index investors
You may worry about it, but concentration has been a boon to index investors and to U.S. investors in general.
We all know the majority of the gains in the last year can be attributed to a small number of mostly tech stocks. Investors who own the S&P 500 don’t have to pick those winners; they just go along for the ride.
Second, U.S. stocks are global market leaders, and when a small group becomes market leaders it almost always means the U.S. stock market outperforms the world.
That is exactly what has happened. The U.S. stock market, which was roughly 40% of the global market capitalization a short while ago, is now roughly 50% of global market capitalization.
U.S. investors in broadly diversified indexes have been richly rewarded for their “concentration risk.”
Sit back and relax a little
Here’s what it all means: Concentration is a characteristic of market cap-weighted indexes. These indexes reward the winners and penalize the losers.
The reason the Magnificent 7 has done so well is that these are the most profitable companies in the world. They are at the cutting edge of transformative technologies, particularly AI.
That’s the primary reason they are the leaders. There are also secondary reasons: globalization, which made supply chains more efficient, and the long decline in interest rates (which has come to an end).
But the bottom line is that in an era where growth has been hard to come by, these companies have plenty of it. And investors are willing to pay up.
What about comparisons to the dot-com era? The stocks at the top contribute a far greater amount to the earnings of the S&P 500 than they did in the 1990s. And the cash flow is much higher.
There’s already been a correction: It was called 2022
At the ETF conference, the big worry among the RIAs was, “But what if there’s a big correction in the Magnificent 7?”
Uh, sorry, but they already corrected. Nvidia went from roughly $292 at the start of 2022 to $112 by October of that year, a drop of 62%. The other Magnificent 7 stocks all had big drops then.
Of course they could all correct again. But the AI revolution is very real.
Nvidia’s sales tripled. Profits were up 800%. That is a very real revolution. More

80% of consumers have used a payment app, according to a survey by NerdWallet.
Democratic lawmakers are supporting a proposed rule by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that would require federal oversight of digital wallets and payments, forcing them to comply with federal funds transfer, privacy, and other consumer protection laws. 
Payment apps charge fees for the convenience of instantly transferring money or linking their credit cards to the app if they use Apple Cash, CashApp, PayPal or Venmo.

Close up of a woman’s hand paying with her smartphone in a cafe, scan and pay a bill on a card machine making a quick and easy contactless payment. 
D3sign | Moment | Getty Images

Payment apps have come under scrutiny by lawmakers and regulators as their usage skyrockets.
It only takes a tap to instantly send money to friends and family. Customers also use them to quickly buy goods online.

That ease of use has 80% of Americans using mobile payment apps, according to a recent survey by NerdWallet. What’s more, 50% of those respondents said they use these apps at least once a week. 
Transaction volume across all payment app service providers in 2022 was estimated at about $893 billion, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
That agency also estimates tap-to-pay transactions from digital wallets will soar by 150% between now and 2028.
Meanwhile, there are growing concerns about financial safety for consumers.
The CFPB is focused on “erecting guardrails and some requirements and obligations for non-traditional players who are offering services very similar to a bank-based product,” said Amy Zirkle, the CFPB’s senior program manager for payments.   

More from Personal Finance:Tax filing season is here. What you need to know’Fraud is at a crisis level’: 5 financial scams to watch out for2024 Tax Tips: Reviewing your 1099 form
To that point, greater oversight of mobile payment apps may be coming.
Democratic lawmakers on Capitol Hill are supporting a proposed rule by the CFPB that would require federal oversight of digital wallets and payments, forcing them to comply with federal funds transfer, privacy and other consumer protection laws that they are not currently required to follow. 
Lawmakers are also calling on payment app companies to clarify their reimbursement policy if consumers get scammed and to make it easier for users to report fraud. 
“People lose their money because payment apps and banks don’t put enough measures in place to protect their customers,” said Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, at a hearing earlier this month on scams in the banking industry. 
Still, new regulations take time to be put in place. In the meantime, experts say that consumers need to understand how these apps work, the fees that may be charged and the risks involved in storing money in a mobile payment app. 

How payment apps work 

Payment apps like Cash App, PayPal or Venmo store payment information and allow the user to make payments online or in person and send money to friends and family.
Meanwhile, Zelle, a popular peer-to-peer digital payment app, lets users trade money with friends and family directly from a bank account. That program ties directly to a bank or credit union account and transfers funds directly.
Unlike Cash App, PayPal and Venmo, Zelle does not allow a user to carry a balance in the app. 
A digital wallet, such as Apple Wallet or Google Wallet, does double duty as a payment app, using Apple Pay or Google Pay, and a place to store information like health insurance cards and loyalty cards for hotels, airlines and other merchants.

Payment app fees can be costly 

Payment apps sometimes charge fees for the convenience of instantly transferring money or linking credit cards to the app if they use Cash App, PayPal, or Venmo. 
Cash App doesn’t charge to send money that is processed within one to three business days, but instant payments have fees ranging between 0.5% and 1.75%. PayPal and Venmo, which PayPal owns, charge a fee of 1.75% of the transfer value or up to $25 for instant transfers. 

With PayPal and Venmo, the user will not pay a fee if they send money to people using your PayPal or Venmo balance from your bank account or debit card. However, if you send a payment that is funded by your credit card, you’ll be charged a 3% fee for the total amount of the transaction. CashApp also charges 3% for payments tied to credit cards.
Zelle does not charge an extra fee for an instant transfer. However, Zelle recommends confirming with your bank or credit union that there are no fees for Zelle transactions.
About 33% of mobile payment app users link their apps to a credit card, and 24% usually pay the fee to get instant transfers from the payment app to their bank account, according to the NerdWallet survey. Those fees can add up quickly. 

Money sitting in most payment apps is at risk 

Most people who use payment apps keep their money sitting in those apps instead of transferring the funds to a bank account. That’s risky, experts warn. 
“Do not treat this like a bank because it doesn’t give you the same level of protection for your funds,” CFPB’s Zirkle said. 
The money you keep in most payment apps is not Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. insured, which provides protection up to $250,000 if a federally insured bank or credit union fails. 
Because money stored on payment apps is generally not insured, it can be risky to use it for that purpose, the CFPB says.
And, if the app fails, the CFPB warns, “your money is likely lost or tied up in a long bankruptcy process.”
To help protect funds in payment apps, link the app to your bank account and transfer money from the payment app as soon as you receive it, experts say.

Protect yourself from payment app scams

 Payment apps aren’t regulated as heavily as debit and credit cards, so you might still be on the hook for unauthorized payments if a scammer gets control of your account. 
“If you get tricked and send money to a thief, you’ve authorized that transaction,” said Scott Talbot, executive vice president of the Electronic Transactions Association, representing the payments industry. “The industry is focused on educating consumers to prevent them from getting tricked in the first place.”
The Federal Trade Commission advises consumers to never give out their access codes, protect accounts with a PIN or multifactor authentication and to double-check the recipients information before sending money. 
If you get an unexpected request for money from someone you recognize, speak with them to make sure the request is from them — and not a hacker who got access to their account. If you think you may have been scammed, contact the payment app directly and also file a report with the FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov.
Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More