More stories

  • in

    Here are the top 10 stock analysts of the past decade, according to TipRanks

    The logo of NVIDIA as seen at its corporate headquarters in Santa Clara, California, in May of 2022.
    Nvidia | via Reuters

    TipRanks is celebrating a decade of simplifying investment decisions through its data-driven research tools: Here is a list of the 10 best analysts on Wall Street.
    To come up with this list, TipRanks analyzed every stock recommendation made by analysts in the past decade. The ranking is based on the analysts’ ability to generate returns with stock ratings and price targets.

    TipRanks’ algorithms calculated the average return and statistical significance of each rating, as well as the analysts’ overall success rate. Each rating made during the past decade was measured over a one-year period.
    TipRanks used its Experts Center tool to identify the top ten analysts who have a high success rate, defying the general market trend and outperforming their peers.

    Arrows pointing outwards

    No. 1 Mark Lipacis – Jefferies
    Mark Lipacis ranks No. 1 out of the 8,371 analysts tracked on TipRanks. The five-star analyst has an overall success rate of 73%. Lipacis’ best rating has been on chipmaker Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA). His buy rating on NVDA stock from Feb. 8, 2016 to Feb. 8, 2017, generated a return of 374.8%.
    No. 2 Jason Seidl – TD Cowen

    Jason Seidl is second on the list and has a success rate of 73%. Seidl’s top recommendation has been Daseke (NASDAQ:DSKE), which provides flatbed and specialized transportation and logistics solutions. The analyst generated a profit of 327.7% through his buy recommendation on DSKE from May 7, 2020 to May 7, 2021.
    No. 3 Quinn Bolton – Needham
    Quinn Bolton ranks No. 3 on TipRanks’ top 10 analysts list with a success rate of 68%. Bolton’s best rating in the past decade has been on ACM Research (NASDAQ:ACMR), a semiconductor equipment manufacturing company. Through his buy recommendation on ACMR, Bolton generated a return of 608.4% from Aug. 19, 2019 to Aug. 19, 2020.
    No.4 Dan Payne – National Bank
    Dan Payne, in fourth place, has an overall success rate of 69%. Payne’s best call has been on Birchcliff Energy (TSE:BIR), an intermediate oil and natural gas company. His buy recommendation on BIR stock generated a return of 372.9% from Oct. 6, 2020 to Oct. 6, 2021.
    No. 5 Scot Ciccarelli  – Truist Financial
    Scot Ciccarelli bags the fifth position and has a success rate of 74%. Ciccarelli’s best recommendation has been Five Below (NASDAQ:FIVE), a discount store chain. His buy recommendation on FIVE resulted in a return of 249.4% from March 18, 2020 to March 18, 2021.  
    No. 6 Rick Schafer – Oppenheimer
    Sixth-place analyst Rick Schafer has a success rate of 73%. Similar to Lipacis, Schafer’s best recommendation has been NVDA. The analyst generated a profit of 190.7% from Aug. 19, 2019 to Aug. 19, 2020.
    No. 7 Ross Seymore – Deutsche Bank
    Ross Seymore grabs the seventh position and sports a success rate of 77%. Seymore’s best recommendation has been Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA), a fabless semiconductor design company. Seymore generated a return of 150% from Nov. 5, 2012 to Nov. 5, 2013.
    No. 8 Patrick Brown – Raymond James
    Patrick Brown ranks No. 8 with a success rate of 75%. The five-star analyst’s top call has been on Saia (NASDAQ:SAIA), a trucking company. Brown generated a profit of 211.2% through his buy call from April 17, 2020 to April 17, 2021.
    No. 9 Colin Rusch – Oppenheimer
    Colin Rusch has the ninth position on the list. The analyst has a 55% overall success rate. Rusch’s best call has been on Westport Fuel Systems (NASDAQ:WPRT), a company engaged in the manufacturing and supply of alternative fuel systems and components. His buy rating on WPRT generated a whopping return of 800% from March 18, 2020, to March 18, 2021.
    No. 10 Shaul Eyal – TD Cowen
    Shaul Eyal ranks No. 10. The analyst has an overall success rate of 68%. Eyal’s best rating in the past decade has been on Cloudflare (NYSE:NET), a cloud-based security solutions provider. Based on his buy recommendation on NET, Eyal generated a return of 384.2% from Feb.14, 2020 to Feb. 14, 2021.
    Bottom line
    Investors can follow top analysts’ views to make informed investment decisions. These analysts generated significant returns from their recommendations in the past decade and have notable success rates.
    See all the analysts who made it to the top 100 list. We will return soon with the top 10 research firms of the past 10 years. More

  • in

    Supreme Court will rule against Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan, legal experts predict

    Unfortunately for borrowers, legal experts are skeptical that the Supreme Court will greenlight President Joe Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan.
    The justices’ decision could have consequences on Biden’s reelection campaign — and the public’s trust in the highest court.

    WASHINGTON, DC – FEBRUARY 27: Student loan borrowers gather at Supreme Court the evening before the court hears two cases on student loan relief to state the relief is legal and needs to happen immediately on February 27, 2023 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Jemal Countess/Getty Images for We The 45 Million)
    Jemal Countess | Getty Images Entertainment | Getty Images

    The Supreme Court decision on whether or not it allows the Biden administration to move forward with the plan to cancel $400 billion in student debt will have life-changing financial consequences for tens of millions of Americans.
    Unfortunately for borrowers, legal experts remain skeptical that the justices will greenlight the relief.

    “I expect the court will rule against the Biden administration,” said Paul Collins, Jr., professor of legal studies and political science at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.
    Collins predicts the six conservative justices will vote down President Joe Biden’s program, and that the three liberal justices will be in favor of it. “The Supreme Court is an incredibly ideological and partisan institution in 2023 — perhaps more so than at any other point in American history,” he said.
    More from Personal Finance:3 ways to cut ‘off the charts’ travel costs, experts sayThis free tax tool may find ‘overlooked’ credits or refunds, IRS saysHere’s Apple’s new 4.15% rate on savings account ranks
    University of Illinois Chicago law professor Steven Schwinn agreed. “I predict the court will rule 6-3 against it, along conventional ideological lines,” he said.
    Schwinn anticipates the six conservative justices to argue that the Biden administration is exceeding its authority by trying to cancel as much as $20,000 in student debt for tens of millions of people.

    The White House has insisted that it’s acting within the law, noting that the Heroes Act of 2003 grants the U.S. education secretary the authority to make changes to the federal student loan system during national emergencies. The nation has been operating under an emergency declaration since March 2020 because of the Covid pandemic.
    That act followed the 9/11 terrorist attacks, providing relief to federal student loan borrowers who’d been affected by those events.
    If the Biden administration is forced to resume student loan payments, which have been paused for over three years, without delivering debt forgiveness, it warns that delinquency and default rates will skyrocket after the economic damage wrought by the public health crisis.

    The plaintiffs challenging student loan forgiveness, including six GOP-led states, argue that the Heroes Act permits much narrower forms of relief, not the sweeping kind of cancellation the president hoped to deliver.
    In other words, the states are basically asserting that Biden is using Covid as an excuse to pass his plan, said higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz.
    “For example, if it was an emergency, why wait three years to provide the forgiveness?” Kantrowitz said. “Why present it in a political framework, as fulfilling a campaign promise?”
    Dan Urman, a law professor at Northeastern University, said the conservative justices also seemed skeptical during oral arguments that the plan was allowed under the Heroes Act.
    “I expect the court to strike down the program,” Urman said.

    He will be launching his 2024 reelection campaign as American’s debt collector.

    Astra Taylor
    co-founder of the Debt Collective

    Given the partisan nature of the highest court, Collins, the professor at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, said the six conservative justices may view blocking the plan as “dealing a blow to Biden’s historical legacy and likely reelection campaign.” Biden is expected to announce his intention of running for the presidency again next week.
    Indeed, millions of Americans will likely be disappointed with the president for failing to deliver on his promise. Before the White House was forced to shut its application for debt relief amid the legal challenges to its plan, 26 million people had requested or qualified for the aid.
    “He will be launching his 2024 reelection campaign as American’s debt collector,” said Astra Taylor, co-founder of the Debt Collective, a union for debtors, said of the president.
    However, should it block the aid, the Supreme Court will likely also take a hit, Schwinn said.
    “The court’s ruling in this case would only contribute further to the belief that this court is just an instrument of the modern Republican Party,” he said. More

  • in

    Why it’s ‘just no question’ new investors should start by opening a Roth IRA, expert says

    The New Road to Retirement

    For new investors, many financial experts recommend opening a Roth individual retirement account as a first step.
    A Roth IRA allows investors to set aside after-tax money up to a certain limit each year.
    Because of the way they are structured, Roth IRAs may offer a distinct advantage. “Tax-free money always grows the fastest,” one expert says.

    Whitebalance.oatt | E+ | Getty Images

    For newcomers getting started in investing, or those who just want to ensure they’re making the wisest moves, experts generally have one piece of advice: Open a Roth individual retirement account.
    “There’s just no question that that is the better place” for their money, according to IRA expert and certified public accountant Ed Slott.

    A Roth IRA allows investors who qualify to set aside after-tax money up to a certain limit each year.  
    One key advantage to Roth IRAs is that the original contributions can be withdrawn at any time for any reason, tax- and penalty-free, at any age, Slott said.

    More from The New Road to Retirement:

    Here’s a look at more retirement news.

    The earnings on the money you invest will also grow tax-free. However, to take those earnings out without having to pay any penalties, you will generally have to wait until after a five-year holding period has passed and you have reached a minimum age of 59½.
    If you meet those two tests, anything that comes out of a Roth will be income tax-free for life, Slott said.
    What’s more, Roth IRAs, unlike other accounts, also offer the most growth acceleration on your money, he said.

    “Tax-free money always grows the fastest, because it’s never eroded by future taxes,” Slott said.

    Who can invest in a Roth IRA

    Importantly, you can start contributing to a Roth IRA starting from any age if you have taxable compensation.
    In 2023, investors may put up to $6,500 in traditional or Roth IRAs (or $7,500 if they’re 50 or older).
    There are certain limitations when it comes to Roth IRAs. Notably, your modified adjusted gross income must be below $138,000 in 2023 to contribute up to the limit, provided you file your federal tax return as single, head of household or married filing separately. Alternatively, that income must be less than $218,000 if you are married filing jointly or a qualifying widower.
    (Phaseouts apply for contributions from individuals and couples with incomes above those thresholds.)

    Why Roth IRAs are a ‘multi-purpose account’

    When meeting with investors who are just getting started, Winnie Sun, co-founder and managing director of Irvine, California-based Sun Group Wealth Partners, said she often steers them to Roth IRAs.
    “The Roth, I always feel, is a multi-purpose account, especially for younger investors when we talk about first investments,” Sun said.
    Roth IRAs can serve two purposes: It can get them started on long-term investing, but at the same time help them sock away money that can be accessed in an emergency, she said.
    Importantly, a Roth, like any IRA, can invest in anything, Slott said.

    “The Roth is just the name of a container, a category of retirement accounts,” Slott said. “The Roth is not, per se, an investment.”
    The way you invest the money inside a Roth IRA account can be adjusted to suit your goals.
    What you choose to put in the Roth IRA can be either savings or investments.
    Regardless of which way you choose to allocate your funds, this can result in tax savings compared to other non-Roth accounts, Slott said.

    ‘Getting started is probably 80% of the effort’

    The advantages of Roth IRAs make it so funding it should be your first priority every year, Slott said. If you reach the limit you can contribute, then you can allocate money elsewhere, he said.
    Notably, investors who are just getting started should not feel discouraged if they cannot maximize their contributions, said Jude Boudreaux, a certified financial planner and partner with The Planning Center in New Orleans.
    “Getting started is probably 80% of the effort,” Boudreaux said, adding that investors can begin with $100, $500 or whatever they can afford.
    “Do what you can now, and then build from there,” Boudreaux added. More

  • in

    Op-ed: After the Silicon Valley Bank collapse, don’t try to time the market

    A continuous mindset of buying and selling in response to market changes may not be a good thing for investors.
    Time, not market timing, is a great friend to money.
    People who invest in alignment with their values are better equipped to stick with their financial plans.

    Rosley Majid / Eyeem | Eyeem | Getty Images

    Following recent bank failures and ongoing market volatility, it may be tempting to try to time the market. Of course, buying low can be a good thing. But a continuous mindset of buying and selling in response to market changes may not be.
    Why? Because time in the market has shown to be more important than timing the market.

    related investing news

    2 days ago

    For example, according to Morningstar data, the John Hancock Funds Fundamental All Cap Core Fund Class I Fund had an 11.39% five-year annual return as of March 31. But despite the fund’s impressive performance, the typical shareholder lost 2.86% a year over that period, Morningstar found.
    How is that possible? In my view, it has to do with when investors buy and sell. When investors buy after a strong run of performance, they are investing when a fund is relatively expensive.
    More from Personal Finance:Why travel to Europe is no longer as much of a bargainStudent loan forgiveness may cause brief credit score dip$7,500 electric vehicle tax credit may soon be harder to get
    After a downturn, investors may hang with it for a while, but many eventually give up. That’s right — they buy high and sold low.
    Then, if the fund recovers — putting on another impressive streak of performance — it may attract another set of investors, who may buy high and later sell low. When this happens over and over again, it means a fund could do very well on average but, on average, its investors could actually lose money.

    In fact, research from Eventide Asset Management using Dalbar data shows that the average investor underperformed nearly every asset class, barely even beating out inflation, from 2001-2021.

    It’s all about time, not timing

    Time — not timing — is a great friend to money. Albert Einstein reportedly called compound interest “the most powerful force in the universe.” Benjamin Franklin is said to have defined it this way: “Money makes money. And money that makes money makes money.”
    As a hypothetical illustration of compound interest, the $3 a day you might spend on a cup of coffee, invested for 40 years, could grow to over $215,000 over 40 years (assuming a 6.7% growth rate). Even modest amounts of money have the potential to grow to impressive sums over long periods of time.
    People tend to forget, when the market is down, that performance over one year can differ drastically from performance over 10 or 20 years.
    It can seem smart to chase a hot return. But what I’ve seen is that investors get nervous when times are hard; they respond to the environment and sell at a lower price.

    The market volatility we’re seeing now spikes two kinds of fear: fear of missing out and fear of loss. Both can lead to poor investment behavior.
    When you look at the performance of the U.S. stock market going all the way back to its inception in 1871, you don’t see a steady upward trend. Instead, you see a zigzag pattern, with lots of ups and downs.
    Ralph Wanger, a successful portfolio manager, once likened it to an excitable dog on a very long leash, darting randomly in every direction, while its owner walks steadily and predictably from southwest to northeast across New York’s Central Park — up, and to the right. His advice, as detailed in Bill Bernstein’s “The Four Pillars of Investing,” was to “keep your eye on the owner, not the dog.”
    So, what strategy can help you practice restraint and avoid the timing mindset? I’ve found that many people who invest in alignment with their values are better equipped to stick with their financial plans, rather than buying and selling at the wrong times. Values remain consistent, even when the market fluctuates.

    When you have a sense of how practicing those values can contribute to a company’s success (like how a great employee culture allows a company to attract and retain the best people), you’ll be more prepared to keep with an investment through those ups and downs.
    Imagine partnering with a portfolio of companies for the long-term that you are proud to own and talk about. That’s what it looks like to shift from a transactional mindset to an ownership mindset, and it can be a powerful driver for long-term success.
    — By Robin John, founding member and CEO of Eventide Asset Management More

  • in

    Op-ed: Want a stronger economy? Start by teaching personal finance to teachers

    There is ample evidence that training teachers in financial education matters can improve their students’ future economic choices, which in turn influence broader economic trends.
    Currently, only half of states require at least one course in either economics or personal finance for high-school graduation, according to the Council for Economic Education.
    Ensuring financial capability for every child in every state seems to have broad voter support, according to Pew Research.

    Caiaimage/chris Ryan | Istock | Getty Images

    While U.S. voters are divided on many issues today, there are at least two where they can agree: They want a stronger economy and better education.
    The good news for policymakers is that there is a simple way to make voters happier on both fronts: They can increase the number of states requiring K-12 financial education.

    Currently, only half of the states in the U.S. require at least one course in either economics or personal finance for high-school graduation, according to data from the Council for Economic Education. That means millions of U.S. consumers are entering adulthood without basic life skills needed to manage debt, invest, save wisely and appropriately weigh economic tradeoffs over their lifetimes.
    Given that consumption represents some two-thirds of the overall U.S. economy, this frequent absence of financial capability can have significant consequences. We have seen consumer decisions repeatedly play meaningful roles in economic downturns, including the housing speculation that fueled the 2008 Financial Crisis and ensuing Great Recession.
    More from Personal Finance:A pilot program aims to get students into accountingThis strategy could shave thousands off the cost of collegeHow to understand your financial aid offer
    While financial literacy alone will not eliminate such risks, there is ample evidence that it can improve economic choices that in turn influence broader economic trends. Consider a few examples:

    Research published in the October 2020 Economics of Education Review concluded that “financial education requirements are associated with fewer defaults and higher credit scores among young adults.”
    A recent report by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, an industry regulatory body, found that “financial literacy has significant predictive power for future financial outcomes,” even after controlling for baseline financial and demographic characteristics.
    Research by Montana State University economics professors Christiana Stoddard and Carly Urban published in 2018 focused on how mandated personal finance education in high school impacted decisions around financial aid and spending entering and during college. It showed that students receiving financial education were more likely to use lower-cost sources of capital to pay for college and had lower credit-card balances and student loan amounts.

    It wouldn’t take much to produce a big incremental improvement in overall consumer financial well-being, given the impact of this education on key financial decisions such as college financing choices, which can mean less debt later on and a greater ability to buy a first home — all drivers of the economy.

    Doing the math on financial education

    Consider five states that currently do not have any graduation requirement tied to personal finance or economics coursework: Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and Washington. These states represent 15% of U.S. gross domestic product and 13.5% of the U.S. high-school student population. Educating every graduate in just this handful of states has the potential to have an outsized impact on the population and indirectly, the country’s economy.
    In the U.S., education policy is overseen by state and local governments, so financial education requirements generally need approval from state bodies or education boards. While only three states — Florida, Georgia and Michigan — last year passed new financial-literacy coursework mandates, the amount of discussion around the topic was encouraging. Thirty state legislatures proposed 117 related bills in 2022, according to the National Endowment for Financial Education.

    Once mandates are in place, it’s a matter of teaching the teachers. Here again, there is a large potential gain relative to the investment needed. About 4 million students will graduate high school in the U.S. this year. Assuming each high school teacher conservatively reaches about 150 students per year, we only need about 26,000 well-trained teachers to educate all those high-school seniors — that is less than 1% of all the teachers in the country.
    Much of this training comes from experienced non-profits, with financial support from federal and state governments, as well as the private sector.
    Of course, those teachers can often end up teaching for decades. So effective initial and ongoing training for a teacher can help not just one graduating class but an entire generation. That means millions of young adults who may be more likely to make better financial decisions.

    Ensuring financial capability for every child in every state seems to have broad voter support, according to a Pew Research poll last year that listed education and the economy as top areas of focus for respondents from both parties. Policymakers should take note.
    Pushing for greater financial literacy is not just a potential political win for both parties; it would also contribute to economically stronger constituents and a more robust economy over time. And it’s easy to move the needle: Pass more mandates and train the teachers.
    — By Rebecca Patterson, chair of the board of the Council for Economic Education and former chief investment strategist at Bridgewater Associates More

  • in

    Savings account interest rates just hit a 15-year high, but fewer Americans are benefitting

    The returns savers can get on their money are the highest they’ve been in 15 years, yet most people don’t have their cash in a high-yield savings account.
    Higher returns are “the only free lunch in finance,” says Greg McBride, Bankrate’s chief financial analyst.
    Amid stubborn inflation, fewer Americans are saving at all.

    D3sign | Moment | Getty Images

    The returns savers stand to get on their money are the highest they’ve been in 15 years, thanks in part to stubborn inflation, which pushed the Federal Reserve into hiking interest rates over the past year.
    Top-yielding online savings account rates are now just north of 5%, the highest since 2008, and much higher than last year’s 0.8%, according to Bankrate.com.

    related investing news

    18 hours ago

    Even Apple got in the game with a savings account offering a 4.15% interest rate.
    More from Personal Finance:How Apple’s new 4.15% savings account ranksThe ‘best defense’ against inflation, per a financial advisorHere are the 3 best ways to pay down credit card
    “Higher returns on federally-insured savings and money market accounts represent the only free lunch in finance,” said Greg McBride, Bankrate’s chief financial analyst. 
    Meanwhile, the savings account rates at some of the largest retail banks, which have been near rock-bottom for years, are currently 0.39%, on average.
    “On a $10,000 balance, that’s $500 you could be earning, versus close to zero,” said Ken Tumin, founder of DepositAccounts.com.  

    While savers could get better returns on their cash, just 22% of savers are earning 3% or more on their accounts — and nearly as many savers are not earning any interest at all, according to a report from Bankrate.
    Most people said the main reasons for not switching to a high-yield savings account were because they preferred their local branch or were comfortable at their current bank. Some also said they worried about the security of their cash at an online institution or they didn’t have enough savings to make the switch worthwhile.
    49% have less in savings, or none, compared to 2022
    Americans, overall, are saving less. Nearly half, or 49%, of adults have less savings or no savings compared to a year ago, according to a separate Bankrate survey from February.
    More than one-third also now have more credit card debt than emergency savings, which is the highest on record.

    If you are not part of the banking system, you are not benefitting from savings rates and not likely building credit very effectively,

    Greg McBride
    chief financial analyst at Bankrate

    “Inflation has been running very hot, so savings has been a casualty of that in many households,” McBride said.
    The average American’s savings are 32% behind where they should be when scaled against their salary, according to one analysis by DollarGeek based on data from the Fed’s Survey of Consumer Finances.  
    4.5% of households are unbanked entirely
    And then there are those who don’t save at all, at least at a bank or credit union.
    In 2022, 4.5% of households had no checking or savings account, according to the FDIC’s latest survey.

    The most common reasons cited for being unbanked included not having enough money to meet minimum balance requirements and distrust of banks, followed by concerns over account fees.
    Although more households can rely on online payment services such as PayPal and Venmo for day-to-day transactions, “if you are not part of the banking system, you are not benefitting from savings rates and not likely building credit very effectively,” McBride said — “and those can have pretty significant ripple effects on your finances, not only now but for years to come.”
    Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube. More

  • in

    How to avoid getting dropped from Medicaid as states narrow coverage

    For the past three years, states have been required to provide continuous Medicaid coverage to enrollees.
    That meant people on Medicaid couldn’t be dropped from the program during that time.
    Starting this month, however, states can disenroll people and as many as 14 million enrollees could lose coverage.

    Solskin | Getty Images

    As a pandemic-era policy winds down, millions of people on Medicaid may lose their coverage — even though they remain eligible, advocates say.
    For the past three years, due to the Families First Coronavirus Response Act, states have been required to provide continuous Medicaid coverage to enrollees in order to get federal funding. That meant people on Medicaid couldn’t be dropped from the program during that time.

    “From March 2020 to March 2023, people could only enter Medicaid, and no one was at risk of losing coverage,” said Kosali Simon, professor of health economics at the O’Neill School at Indiana University.
    Starting this month, however, states are resuming the usual eligibility redetermination process, which may lead to difficulties for millions of Americans, many of whom are already in a vulnerable position.
    “The Medicaid population is disproportionately low income, with chronic or debilitating conditions, and they also frequently move residences or do not speak English as their primary language,” said Caitlin Donovan, a spokesperson for the National Patient Advocate Foundation.
    More from Personal Finance:3 ways to cut ‘off the charts’ travel costs, experts sayThis free tax tool may find ‘overlooked’ credits or refunds, IRS saysHere’s Apple’s new 4.15% rate on savings account ranks
    The expiration of the continuous coverage provision could result in as many as 14 million people losing their Medicaid coverage, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. Nearly 7 million people may be dropped from their plans even though they still qualify.

    “The states may not have the correct contact information for them, or even if they do, [enrollees] may not realize what the forms are when they receive them in the mail,” Donovan said.
    Here’s how to avoid losing your Medicaid coverage if you believe you remain eligible.

    Be on the lookout for notices about coverage

    In the following months, states are likely to reach out to Medicaid beneficiaries in multiple ways, Donovan said.
    “People should always check their mail for notices from their state Medicaid agency, but they can also check email, texts, phone calls or even e-portals where they may manage their care,” she said.

    You’ll want to quickly provide any information your state agency requests from you, Donovan said, adding, “It may keep you enrolled.”
    Some of the notices states are sending to people are confusing, Donovan said.
    For example, she said one state told someone that they no longer qualified for Medicaid but then said their eligibility was still being determined. This is why communication with your agency and making sure they have the latest information for you will be crucial, she said.
    “This is going to be a confusing process for a lot of people,” Donovan said. “If you receive notice, don’t give up hope.”

    You can appeal if you’re dropped, find new coverage

    Your state should provide you with information on how to appeal your coverage decision, should they deem you ineligible, Donovan said. That process should unfold within a certain time frame to avoid too long of a gap in your coverage.
    Anyone who loses their appeal for Medicaid coverage could look for insurance on the public exchange, Donovan said, where a special enrollment period is open through July.
    “The marketplace has subsidies in place so you should be able to find a zero monthly premium plan and may even qualify for out-of-pocket assistance as well,” she said.
    In some states, former Medicaid enrollees may actually be automatically transferred to a marketplace program. “Every state is different,” Donovan said.
    She is especially concerned that millions of children will become uninsured over the following months.
    Parents who are dropped from Medicaid shouldn’t assume that their children no longer qualify either, she said. Children can be eligible for Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program at higher income levels than adults.
    “Basically, double-check everything,” Donovan said. More

  • in

    How new grads can better their odds of landing a job even as employers cut back on college hires

    Those armed with a newly minted college diploma are entering a job market that suddenly looks a little less promising than it did a few months ago.
    Employers now project hiring 4% more new college graduates than they did from the Class of 2022, a new report said. But that’s down from the projection employers made in the fall, of hiring 15% more year over year. 
    Experts share their best advice for students entering the job market.

    The outlook for newly minted graduates doesn’t look as good as it once did.
    Employers plan to hire about 4% more new college graduates from this year’s class than they hired from the Class of 2022, according to a report from the National Association of Colleges and Employers.

    However, that’s down significantly from earlier projections: In the fall, employers said they would boost hiring roughly 15% year over year. 
    More from Personal Finance:A pilot program aims to get students into accountingThis strategy could shave thousands off the cost of collegeHow to understand your financial aid offer
    Tech companies, in particular, have dramatically scaled back on their college hires, the NACE report found.
    Year to date, job cuts are up nearly 400% from the same period a year ago, led by layoffs in the tech sector, according to a recent report by outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas.
    As those layoffs mount, job openings have also begun to fall. Available positions in February declined to below 10 million for the first time since May 2021, according to data from the U.S. Department of Labor.

    “We know companies are approaching 2023 with caution, though the economy is still creating jobs,” said Andrew Challenger, senior vice president of Challenger, Gray & Christmas.

    Start job hunting early

    As a result, many college seniors are jumping on opportunities: 62% have already accepted their first job after college, compared with only 20% from the Class of 2022 at this time last year, according to a report by LaSalle Network.  
    Soon-to-be graduates “want to have something hat in hand more than before,” said LaSalle Network CEO Tom Gimbel. 
    His advice: “College seniors should be interviewing with as many companies that they can and not worry about the industry or location.”
    “The earlier you start planning the more options you have,” he said.

    Vicki Salemi, career expert at Monster, suggests setting up job alerts to find openings as they become available and aim to apply within 24 hours.
    But first, take a few minutes to craft a cover letter, tailor the executive summary and reorder your bullets to mirror the job description, she said. For example, “If the first line item is about travel, highlight that you studied abroad.”  
    Then, do one last review to catch any typos or grammatical errors before hitting send.
    And don’t just apply online, cautioned Barbara Safani, president of Career Solvers in New York.
    Recent or soon-to-be grads can also stay ahead of their competition by networking with parents, professors, family friends, classmates and an extensive alumni network. “Attend campus career fairs to get a chance to talk to employers face to face,” Safani said.
    “Be present; don’t hide behind a screen,” she said.
    Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube. More