Investing

Retirement account balances in 401(k) plans lost nearly one-quarter of their value in 2022, according to Fidelity’s analysis.
Amid ongoing high inflation and economic uncertainty, nearly half of retirees expect to outlive their savings.

Fluxfactory | E+ | Getty Images

In a year marked by stiff economic headwinds, retirement savers paid the price.
Although the average 401(k) balance rose in the fourth quarter of last year, balances ended 2022 down 23% from a year earlier to $103,900, according to a new report by Fidelity Investments, the nation’s largest provider of 401(k) plans. The financial services firm handles more than 35 million retirement accounts in total.

The average individual retirement account balance also plunged 20% year over year to $104,000 in the fourth quarter of 2022.

“Given all the stresses in the world today, such as natural disasters and geo-political events, Americans continue to confront challenging times in our economy,” Kevin Barry, president of workplace investing at Fidelity, said in a statement Thursday.
Still, the majority of retirement savers continue to contribute, Fidelity found. The average 401(k) contribution rate, including employer and employee contributions, mostly held steady at 13.7%, just below Fidelity’s suggested savings rate of 15%.
And despite the ongoing inflationary pressure straining most households, only 16.7% of plan participants had a loan outstanding from their 401(k) at the end of the year, Fidelity said.
More from Personal Finance:1 in 6 retirees are mulling a return to workMarch is a three-paycheck month for some workersWhat is a ‘rolling recession’ and how does it impact you?

Federal law allows workers to borrow up to 50% of their account balance, or $50,000, whichever is less. However many financial experts similarly advise against tapping a 401(k) before exhausting all other alternatives since you’ll also be forfeiting the power of compound interest. 
A separate analysis from Vanguard also found that average 401(k) balances fell 20% in 2022 to $112,572, and hardship withdrawals ticked up slightly.
At the same time, many households also ate into their emergency savings over the course of 2022, other research shows.

Across all ages and income levels, at least one-third of adults said they are likely to have less in savings now compared with a year ago, according to a recent report by Bankrate.
“It’s clear that the less-than-optimal economy, including historically high inflation coupled with rising interest rates, has taken a double-edged toll on Americans,” said Mark Hamrick, senior economic analyst at Bankrate.

Many retirees expect to outlive their savings

The growing savings shortfall has many older Americans worried about their retirement security. Nearly half, or 48%, of retired Americans believe they’ll outlive their savings, a separate report by Clever Real Estate found.
“Everyone is feeling pressure financially — there’s a lot of uncertainty out there in the markets and the economy,” said Mike Shamrell, Fidelity’s vice president of thought leadership.
However, “a lot of people understand there’s going to be ups and downs,” he added. “Don’t let short-term economic events derail your long-term retirement savings efforts.”
Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

The current allure of financial stocks — the result of low valuations and high levels of capital — is especially strong as higher interest rates make lending money more profitable.
Large banks hold nearly twice the capital relative to their risk-weighted assets that they did before the financial crisis of 2008.
This sector is currently positioned for sustained earnings strength and likely price growth throughout the year and into 2024.

Credit card providers are benefitting from post-pandemic travel and increasing card usage in general, with balances way up in recent months.
Valentinrussanov | E+ | Getty Images

Financial stocks were so out of favor for most of 2022 that perhaps their tickers should have been appended with a Nathaniel Hawthorne-esque “U” — for “unloved.” Yet after some decent gains so far this year, the sector could draw suitors aplenty as 2023 progresses.
The present allure of financial stocks, stemming from low valuations and high levels of capital, is especially strong as higher interest rates are making lending money more profitable.

As of mid-February, the Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF had recovered about half its 2022 losses. Amid this comeback, robust earnings have kept the sector’s price-earnings ratios low, as reflected by XLF’s P/E of 14.5 in mid-February.

Buckets are out at the banks

Low share prices are the norm

Despite gains this year, share prices of this sector are still quite low, considering good earnings and a long history of corporate performance.  
One reason for the low prices is fear of recession. But even if the most widely anticipated recession ever actually becomes reality, assuming that the short-and-shallow camp turns out to be right, financial sector earnings could easily prove more resilient than normally expected in a downturn.

Also tamping down prices is long-term market perception, said Christopher Davis, portfolio manager and chairman of Davis Advisors in New York. Several months ago, he made the case that financials tend to be mispriced because they’re “widely misunderstood,” adding the sector was (and still is, in my opinion) “primed for long-term revaluation.”
Revaluation could be in the offing, as indicated by shifts in the sector’s technical indicators, especially those for diversified financial companies and insurance companies, following growth in the latter this year. As of late February, Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF was up more than 14% over the preceding six months. After taking big hits from Hurricane Ian last year, insurance companies are getting more respect from analysts now that they are on firmer footing in fairer weather.

A close haircut for regional banks

Regional banks, which took a close haircut early last year after hitting a five-year peak in January, are also recovering. The bellwether ETF for this group, SPDR Regional Banking, was up nearly 9% year to date as of mid-February. Many regional banks have recently been buying back shares to support a floor on prices and give shareholders more total return without getting locked into dividend increases.
Meanwhile, credit card providers are benefitting from post-pandemic travel and increasing card usage in general, with balances way up in recent months. Also positive are prospects for exchanges and data providers, a sector category whose earnings in recent years have grown twice as fast as those of the S&P 500.

Here are some attractive financial stocks with strong growth prospects and fundamental metrics signaling low downside risk:

Truist Financial: Formed in 2019 by a merger of equals — regional banks BB&T Corp. and SunTrust — Truist is now the nation’s seventh-largest bank, with a capitalized ratio nearly twice what’s required by regulators. Truist’s dividend has more than doubled in the last 10 years. Post-merger kinks typically dampen companies’ share price growth, so Truist’s recent underperformance relative to KRE was expected. And Truist’s growth could exceed peers’ because it operates in rapidly growing regions — primarily, the mid-Atlantic and Southeast.

East West Bancorp: This is a fast-growing, full-service commercial bank with locations in the U.S., serving the Asian-American community, and in China. Shares were up nearly 19% year to date as of mid-February. This growth is expected to accelerate from China’s reopening from Covid lockdowns. CFRA has this bank as a strong buy, forecasting 2023 growth of 17% to 19%, in part because net interest income currently makes up 89% of its revenue, versus 73% for peers. Also, the bank has “no exposure to mortgage banking or capital markets, which have been severely impacted by rising rates and economic uncertainty,” CFRA states, citing balance sheet momentum, a discounted valuation and the advantage of a Chinese population in the U.S. that’s growing faster than the whole.

FactSet Research Systems: FactSet is the star of the sector’s data-provider segment. It’s an interesting, attractive play with recurring revenues of 98%, largely because financial firm customers rely so heavily on FDS’s data. You can see it cited on brokerage platforms and analyst reports. FDS’s software, data and analytics supports the workflow of both buy-side and sell-side clients. Customers include asset managers, bankers, wealth managers, asset owners, hedge funds, corporate users, and private equity and venture capital professionals. The company has an excellent track record of maneuvering through tough economic times, evidenced by its top-line sales growth for 42 consecutive years and annual dividend raises for the last 23 years. The difficulties of changing data providers amount to an economic moat that’s daunting to competitors.

American Express: This is the right business at the right time, with business travel improving, China reopening and consumer spending among the affluent strong. Revenue growth went from a 10-year stretch of 2% annually to 25% in 2022, with 17% growth forecast for this year. Connecting better with millennials and Generation Z customers than its peers, American Express is acquiring new cardholders at an increasing rate. Analysts expect earnings to rocket up 30% over the next two years, while those of competitors appear likely to shrink. And because of well-heeled customers, this company has less credit risk than its peers.

Chubb: Chubb is the world’s largest publicly traded property and casualty insurer, operating in 54 countries but with 60% of its revenue from North America. CB has a market-leading position in industrial, commercial and mid-market traditional and specialty property-casualty coverage. It is also a leader in high net worth personal-insurance coverage, a category unlikely to feel pain from an economic downturn. Chubb has high-quality underwriting, but shares are trading at a discount to peers with lower-quality underwriting. Higher premiums, a 98.4% customer-retention rate and higher interest rates should all contribute to strong earnings growth, and shares are widely viewed as significantly undervalued.

The current, higher rates aren’t going down anytime soon. This sector is currently positioned for sustained earnings strength and likely price growth throughout this year and into 2024.
— By Dave Sheaff Gilreath, CFP, partner and chief investment officer of Sheaff Brock Investment Advisors LLC and Innovative Portfolios LLC.

WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

Defaulting on federal student loans can trigger other major financial consequences for borrowers, including a lower credit score and wage garnishment.
A new Department of Education program gives those who’ve fallen behind on their student debt a limited chance to get into current standing.

Pixelfit | E+ | Getty Images

Falling behind on federal student loans is likely to trigger other major financial consequences for borrowers, according to new research by The Pew Charitable Trusts.
More than 80% of borrowers who experienced default stated that they’d faced at least one additional consequence as a result. The most common impact was a drop in their credit score (62%) followed by being subject to collection fees (47%) and losing eligibility for future federal financial aid (37%).

Other consequences that followed from a default on federal student loans included wage garnishment, the suspension of professional licenses and having Social Security or tax refunds offset.
(The research organization NORC at the University of Chicago conducted an online survey on behalf of Pew in the summer of 2021 studying borrowers’ experiences, focusing on those who had defaulted on a federal student loan. The sample included 1,609 respondents.)
More from Personal Finance:White House making change to student loan repaymentRetirees’ Medicare expenses could top $383,000 per coupleEntrepreneur built $3 million business buying cars at auctions
“Low credit scores can make it harder to get other kinds of credit that are important to borrowers’ financial lives, like home loans, car loans and credit cards,” said Phillip Oliff, director of Pew’s student loan research project. “Despite these penalties, rates of default and redefault are alarmingly high.”
Most recently, U.S. Department of Education Undersecretary James Kvaal said that if the government isn’t allowed to carry out its sweeping student loan forgiveness plan, there could be a “historically large increase in the amount of federal student loan delinquency and defaults as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic.”

Many unaware of consequences of default

The Pew survey found that many borrowers aren’t aware of specific consequences of defaulting on their federal student loan debt. A third or less of respondents knew, for example, about the possibility of collection fees or wage garnishment prior to falling behind.
“The consequences of default are not just punitive but also intended to recover the funds for the federal government,” said higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz.
In addition to the financial setbacks, respondents reported “a high emotional toll” connected to experiencing the consequences of default “with themes of sadness, depression and anger.”

A borrower is typically considered to be in default when they’ve been past due on their debt between 270 days and 360 days.
Federal student loan payments have been on pause since March 2020, when the coronavirus pandemic first hit the U.S. and crippled the economy. They’re scheduled to resume 60 days after the legal troubles over the Biden administration’s student loan forgiveness plan resolve, or by the end of August, whichever comes sooner.
Collection activity on the debt remains on pause as long as the bills do.

Defaulted borrowers get a ‘fresh start’

Fortunately, the U.S. Department of Education is also providing federal student loan borrowers who’ve fallen behind on their debt a chance to get into current standing.
As part of its “Fresh Start” initiative, the 7.5 million student loan borrowers who are in default are able to return to repayment without a past-due balance. The program was announced last spring.
Once it officially launches, borrowers will start by choosing a repayment plan at MyEdDebt.Ed.Gov or by calling the Education Department’s Default Resolution Group at 800-621-3115, Kantrowitz said.

Your loans should then be transferred from the Default Resolution Group, which is run by Maximus, to a new servicer.
After you’ve been matched with a new servicer and are enrolled in a payment plan, the default should be automatically cleared from your record, Kantrowitz said.
The opportunity is temporary, however. Borrowers will have a one-year window to switch into a new repayment plan and to start making payments when the Covid suspension of bills concludes, which could be as early as May. Take action as soon as you’re able, Kantrowitz added, “to avoid the last-minute rush.”

WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

Even as college applications surge, a number of institutions are in financial jeopardy.
Smaller, less selective schools have been the hardest hit, while the country’s most elite colleges and universities continue to thrive.

Citing inflationary pressures and sinking enrollment, more colleges are set to close in 2023.
Already, Presentation College in Aberdeen, South Dakota; Cazenovia College in Cazenovia, New York; Holy Names University in Oakland, California; and Living Arts College in Raleigh, North Carolina, announced they will shut down after the current academic year.

The consequences of fewer students and less tuition revenue since the start of the pandemic have been severe, according to Kristin Reynolds, a partner and leader of NEPC’s Endowments and Foundations practice.
“Larger institutions can weather the storm,” she said.
More from Personal Finance:How to decide if you should go back to schoolThe cheapest states for in-state college tuitionThe most-regretted college majors
The number of colleges closing down in the past 10 years has quadrupled compared with the previous decade, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal.
Not only have many smaller institutions struggled as students opt for less expensive public schools or alternatives to a four-year degree altogether, but economic uncertainty and inflation also continue to weigh on markets, taking a hefty toll on endowments and leaving more colleges and universities in financial jeopardy.

Meanwhile, the country’s most elite institutions are thriving.

College applications jump

Harvard University campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Michael Fein | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Coming out of the pandemic, a small group of universities, including many in the Ivy League, experienced a record-breaking increase in applications this season, a report by the Common Application found.
The report said the number of college applicants has jumped 20% since the 2019-20 school year, even as enrollment has slumped nationwide, suggesting more students are applying to the same schools.
“For brand-name colleges, the demand is off the charts,” said Hafeez Lakhani, founder and president of Lakhani Coaching in New York. “It’s never been harder to get in.”

The majority of people are going to say, ‘Is that worth my while?’

Hafeez Lakhani
founder and president of Lakhani Coaching

On the other hand, private colleges that are less prestigious but equally expensive are struggling to attract applicants, he added. “The majority of people are going to say, ‘Is that worth my while?'”
College is becoming a path for only those with the means to pay for it, other reports also show. 
And costs are still rising. Tuition and fees plus room and board for a four-year private college averaged $53,430 in the 2022-2023 school year; at four-year, in-state public colleges, it was $23,250, according to the College Board.
Now, the majority of applicants hail from the wealthiest zip codes, the Common Application found.

Higher education endowments take a hit

Although the investment performance for college and university endowments sank in 2022 overall, the losses were not shared equally across the board, according to a separate report by the National Association of College and University Business Officers.
Colleges and universities with the largest endowments, or more than $1 billion in assets, performed better than smaller schools with less than $25 million, which were the weakest performers, posting average returns down 11.5%, compared with an average loss of 4.5%, the report found. 

Arrows pointing outwards

As a result, universities such as Harvard, Yale, Stanford and Princeton are able to maintain or even expand their financial aid offerings, lowering the cost and increasing the appeal to more students nationwide.
“The largest endowments are able to support their schools a little bit more,” Reynolds said. “These colleges are continuing to attract students through scholarships and that makes them more competitive.”
That means other schools will only continue to struggle, Lakhani predicted. Going forward, “more colleges will either close departments or shut down,” he said.
Correction: This story has been updated to accurately state the academic year Common Application used to calculate the percentage increase in the number of college applicants. An earlier version incorrectly cited the increase as year over year.
Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

Democratic lawmakers are renewing a proposal aimed at helping to narrow the wealth gap in the U.S.
“Baby bonds” of $1,000 per child, plus up to $2,000 per year based on income, may help pay for tuition or other costs once they turn 18.
Here’s how the proposal would work.

Urbazon | E+ | Getty Images

Democratic lawmakers in Washington are renewing a proposal to give every American child $1,000 at birth.
The “baby bond” funds, called American Opportunity Accounts, would then be topped off with up to $2,000 per year, depending on a family’s income.

The accounts would be federally insured and managed by the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
Account holders would be able to access the funds once they turn 18 to pay for eligible uses, such as higher education or homeownership.
More from Personal Finance:What is a ‘rolling recession’ and how does it impact you?Almost half of Americans think we’re already in a recessionIf you want higher pay, your chances may be better now
The bill, called the American Opportunity Accounts Act, was re-introduced last week by Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., and Rep. Ayana Pressley, D-Mass.
For a family of four with less than $25,100 in income, the accounts may reach $46,215 by the time a child reaches 18, based on 2019 estimates. Those sums would be reduced for families with higher incomes, as annual supplement payments gradually phase out. For a family of four with income of $125,751, a child turning 18 would see an estimated account balance of $1,681, with $0 annual payments.

Taxing estates, heirs to give youngest Americans a lift

The legislation calls for making the changes fully paid for by raising inheritance and estate taxes. A 2019 analysis by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget found the bill’s proposed revenue increases would more than offset the cost of the legislation.
“‘Baby bonds’ would fix our broken tax code by providing every American child with start-up capital for their life, and helping to drive down the wealth inequality that holds American families back from their full potential,” Booker said in a statement.
The policy is aimed at narrowing the wealth gap, which has grown dramatically in the past 50 years, according to the lawmakers. It may also help the persistent racial wealth gap.

In 2016, Black households had a median wealth of $17,100 and Hispanic households had $20,600, while white households’ wealth was a median of $171,000, according to the Pew Research Center.
The idea of baby bonds is getting traction in some states.
Baby bond legislation has passed in California, Connecticut and Washington, D.C. Another eight states have introduced legislation, according to the Urban Institute, including Iowa, New Jersey, New York, Wisconsin, Washington, Delaware, Nevada and Massachusetts.
The terms for how much funds would provide, as well as permitted uses for the money, varies. The total endowments by adulthood start from $3,000. The federal proposal, which would provide almost as much as $50,000 to the lowest income families, is the most generous.

Bipartisan support varies on federal and state levels

The reintroduction of the federal proposal provides an opportunity for a more universal program, rather than a state-by-state approach to baby bonds, noted Madeline Brown, senior policy associate at the Research to Action Lab at the Urban Institute.
A national policy may reduce the wealthy disparity between young white and Black Americans to a ratio of 1 to 4, according to the research. Estimates have found young white Americans have 16 times the wealth of young Black Americans, based on median incomes.
“Wealth isn’t just for the wealthy; it really is a component for financial health,” Brown said.
“If the goal is really to address wealth inequity, programs like baby bonds that are starting early and thinking about how do you actually grow dollars long term are really exciting because they can be an important tool in this whole financial security toolbox,” she said.

To date, the support behind the federal bill comes from the left side of the aisle, including Sens. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.; Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.; and Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.
However, there is more bipartisan support at the state level, according to Brown. Part of that is due to residency requirements, Brown said, which may encourage young people to stay and join the workforce, buy homes and start families and businesses in the states.
In order for baby bonds to successfully address wealth gaps, the policies should have six components, according to the Urban Institute. That includes universal eligibility for all children; deposits that are progressive, or based on household wealth; terms that allow for flexible use of the funds for wealth-building activities like tuition, home purchases or starting a business; financing provided by the government; substantial endowments that would protect the principal while earning a return on the money; and making the young people the ultimate beneficiaries of the money.

WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

Federal student loan payments could resume as early as May, depending on how quickly the Supreme Court reaches a decision on student loan forgiveness.
The pandemic-relief policy has now been extended eight times and spanned nearly three years.

Skynesher | E+ | Getty Images

Restart depends on Supreme Court decision timing

When student loan payments restart depends on how long the Supreme Court justices take to issue a decision on the president’s plan, said higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz.
In November, the U.S. Department of Education announced the latest extension to the payment pause on federal student loans, saying the bills would resume 60 days after the litigation over its student loan forgiveness plan resolves. If the legal issues with the administration’s forgiveness plan are still unfolding by the end of June, or if it’s not allowed to move forward with forgiving student debt by then, payments will pick up at the end of August.

“If the court issues a ruling a few weeks after the Feb. 28 hearing, repayment could restart in May or June,” Kantrowitz said. “If they wait until the end of the term in June or July, then there’d be an August or September restart.”
In an analysis of the last Supreme Court’s term, Kantrowitz found that half of the decisions were issued in June.

Servicers will determine when your payment is due

Federal student loan payments have been on pause since March 2020, when the coronavirus pandemic first hit the U.S. and crippled the economy. Resuming the bills for more than 40 million Americans will be a massive task.
When a borrowers’ payment is due again will depend in part on their timeline with their servicer, Kantrowitz said.
“They’re not going to restart everybody’s student loan payments on the same day, everywhere, all at once,” he said. “Most likely, borrowers will have the same payment due date as they did before the pandemic.”

And another extension is still possible, Kantrowitz added. He noted that the Education Department had said twice before on previous extensions of the payments pause that it would be the final extension — only to prolong it yet again.
During the extended payment pause, the Education Department is also ceasing all collection activity, it said, including the garnishment of wages and tax refunds.

Supreme Court will decide loan forgiveness fate

Shortly after Biden announced his sweeping plan to cancel up to $20,000 in student debt for millions of Americans, a number of conservative groups and Republican-backed states attacked the policy in the courts.
Two of these lawsuits — which the Supreme Court has agreed to hear oral arguments for — have been successful in at least temporarily halting the relief.
The high court justices should put an end to the uncertainty on loan forgiveness.

Sixty days will be enough to forgive student loan debt if the president’s plan survives.

Mark Kantrowitz
higher education expert

“The benefit of the Supreme Court ruling is that it will settle, for now, all of the litigation related to the loan forgiveness,” Dan Urman, a law professor at Northeastern University, said in an earlier interview with CNBC.
If the justices allow student loan forgiveness to go through, many borrowers will never have to restart payments. According to a White House estimate, roughly 20 million people could have their debt entirely cleared under the president’s plan.
“Sixty days will be enough to forgive student loan debt if the president’s plan survives,” Kantrowitz said. “They’ve already approved forgiveness for 16 million borrowers, so they just need to transmit this information to the loan servicers.
“It should take one to two weeks for the servicers to implement.”

WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

If you get paid biweekly as a W-2 employee, there are two months out of the year when you will receive three paychecks instead of two.
Depending on your pay schedule, the first one for 2023 could be in March.
Here’s how to plan for an extra check.

These are the three-paycheck months in 2023

If your first paycheck in 2023 was Friday, Jan. 6, your three-paycheck months will be March and September.
Otherwise, if your first paycheck in 2023 was Friday, Jan. 13, your three-paycheck months will be June and December.

How to make the most of a three-paycheck month

“March is a great time to receive that third paycheck,” said Winnie Sun, co-founder and managing director of Sun Group Wealth Partners, based in Irvine, California, and a member of CNBC’s Advisor Council.

Particularly with the tax deadline approaching, there are some smart strategies you can employ, she said, such as setting some funds aside if you expect to owe money this year or putting the cash toward your individual retirement account, which can potentially lower your tax bill.
But before making any investment moves, “if you have credit card debt, that needs to be paid off first,” Sun advised. As day-to-day expenses continue to rise, Americans are taking on more debt. At the same time, annual percentage rates are also heading higher, making it much more expensive to carry a balance.

“Now might be a really good time to have that extra cash, given the uncertainty in the economy,” said certified financial planner Douglas Boneparth, president of Bone Fide Wealth in New York and a member of CNBC’s Advisor Council.
Still, rather than plan monthly expenses and savings from paycheck to paycheck, a better way to budget is to consider your income over the course of the year to smooth out the highs and lows and then view your cash flow on a monthly basis, Boneparth advised. (Here’s a simple way to make a monthly budget and start saving money.)
The “bonus” paycheck “is really an illusion,” he said.
Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More

If you’re looking for ways to trim your yearly tax bill, experts may check your portfolio, since some investments are more likely to trigger taxes in certain accounts.
Generally, assets creating income are better suited for a tax-deferred or tax-free account.
However, you’ll also need to consider your goals and timeline when deciding where to keep your investments.

dowell | Moment | Getty Images

If you’re looking for ways to trim your yearly tax bill, experts may check your portfolio, since some assets are more likely to trigger taxes in certain accounts.
Your 401(k) account offers tax-deferred growth, meaning you won’t owe levies on yearly income, such as dividends and capital gains.

By contrast, you may owe taxes for selling assets or receiving income in a brokerage account, which may be a surprise for some investors.
More from Personal Finance:Biden administration making big change to student loan repaymentMedicare expenses in retirement could top $383,000 for a coupleThis entrepreneur built a $3 million business buying cars at auctions
“I definitely take that into consideration when I’m designing portfolios for clients,” said JoAnn May, a certified financial planner at Forest Asset Management in Berwyn, Illinois. “I always keep the taxability of assets in mind when strategizing where things are going to go.”
If you have three types of accounts — brokerage, tax-deferred and tax-free — you can pick the best spot for each asset, said May, who is also a certified public accountant. 
Since bonds may have less growth but distribute income, they may be suitable for tax-deferred accounts like your 401(k) plan, she said, and investments most likely to appreciate may be ideal for tax-free accounts, like a Roth individual retirement account.

However, if you don’t have the three account options, there may be other opportunities for tax efficiency, May said.
For example, if you have a large enough bond portfolio, you may have to put some assets in a brokerage account. But depending on your income, you may consider municipal bonds, she suggested, which generally avoid federal levies and possibly state and local taxes on interest. 
Other assets to avoid in a brokerage account are real estate investment trusts, or REITs, which must distribute 90% of taxable income to shareholders, said Mike Piper, a CPA at the firm in his name in St. Louis.

“If you have to have [funds] in taxable accounts, you want to make sure it’s generally something with low turnover,” he said.
Exchange-traded funds or index funds generally spit off less income than actively-managed mutual funds, which typically have year-end payouts.
Of course, taxes aren’t the only factor when deciding where to keep your assets. You’ll also need to consider your goals and timeline.

There’s a tax risk for all-in-one funds

Bymuratdeniz | E+ | Getty Images

Another investment that’s better suited in tax-deferred or tax-free accounts is all-in-one funds, which attempt to create a whole portfolio, such as target-date funds, an age-based retirement asset.   
Since all-in-one funds contain different types of assets, there’s no ability to put certain portions, such as bonds spitting off income, into a more tax-efficient spot, Piper explained.  
These investments also limit your ability to use tax-loss harvesting, or sell assets at a loss to offset gains, because you can’t change the underlying holdings, he said. 

For example, let’s say your all-in-one fund has U.S. stocks, international stocks and bond funds. If there’s a dip in domestic stocks, you can’t harvest those losses by selling only that portion, whereas you may have that choice if you own each fund individually.
You may also see excess turnover from the underlying funds, creating capital gains that may be taxed at regular income rates, depending on the length of ownership.   
“They’re really just not a great fit for taxable accounts,” Piper added.

WATCH LIVEWATCH IN THE APP More