More stories

  • in

    BlackRock has a ‘responsibility to democratize investing,’ including in crypto, Larry Fink says

    BlackRock’s move into crypto fits into the asset management giant’s broader mission of creating products that are easy to use and cheap for investors, CEO Larry Fink said Friday.
    “We believe we have a responsibility to democratize investing. We’ve done a great job, and the role of ETFs in the world is transforming investing. And we’re only at the beginning of that,” Fink said on “Squawk on the Street.”

    related investing news

    BlackRock applied for a spot bitcoin ETF on June 15, which appeared to spur a rally in cryptocurrencies and a flurry of similar filings from other asset managers. The initial filing for the iShares Bitcoin Trust did not include a management fee.
    The Securities and Exchange Commission has previously rejected dozens of applications for similar funds, but BlackRock’s involvement and the proposed surveillance sharing agreement in the filing is seen by many in the crypto industry as a sign that momentum is shifting.
    “We are working with our regulators because, as in any new market, if BlackRock’s name is going to be on it, we’re going to make sure that it’s safe and sound and protected,” Fink said.

    Fink had previously been critical of crypto, saying in 2017 that the popularity of digital currencies was do in large part to money laundering.
    However, interest from clients and the high cost of transactions motivated BlackRock to take a closer look at entering the space, Fink said. He also added that crypto can serve a diversification role in investor portfolios.

    “It has a differentiating value versus other asset classes, but more importantly, because it’s so international it’s going to transcend any one currency,” Fink said.
    The CEO declined to discuss the spot bitcoin ETF directly, saying he is prohibited from doing so while the filing is with the SEC.
    BlackRock reported its second-quarter results on Friday, earning $9.28 in adjusted earnings per share on $4.46 billion in revenue. The company said it now has more than $9 trillion in assets under management. More

  • in

    As the Social Security reform debate heats up on Capitol Hill, leaders weigh if raising taxes is the answer

    This week, the Senate Budget Committee met on Capitol Hill to consider the dilemma facing the program.
    The latest projections from the Social Security trustees show the program’s combined funds may run out in 2034.
    Proposals to increase levies on high earners have sparked a debate among lawmakers and experts as to whether those changes would be fair.

    zimmytws | iStock | Getty Images

    When it comes to Social Security benefits, a key deadline is looming: Benefits may be reduced in the next decade if no action is taken sooner.
    This week, the Senate Budget Committee met on Capitol Hill to consider the dilemma facing the program with a focus on a key question: Should payroll taxes be adjusted to make it so the wealthy pay more into the program?

    The latest projections from the Social Security trustees show the program’s combined funds may run out in 2034, at which point 80% of benefits will be payable. The fund used to pay retirement benefits may run out even sooner — in 10 years in 2033 — at which point 77% of those benefits would be payable.
    Social Security is a “pay as you go” program, Social Security Administration Chief Actuary Stephen Goss said at Wednesday’s Senate hearing.
    More from Personal Finance:Social Security beneficiaries may see a lower cost-of-living adjustment in 2024Here’s the inflation breakdown for June, in one chartSocial Security phone disruptions have led to longer wait times
    In 2023, up to $160,200 in earnings are subject to Social Security payroll taxes.
    In 1983, when major legislation was enacted to shore up Social Security’s trust funds, 90% of covered earnings fell below the taxable maximum, according to Goss.

    As of 2000, that dropped to 82.5%.
    Since then, it has remained at about that same level. “We expect it to remain there in the future,” Goss said.

    Senate Budget Committee Chairman Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., touted his bill, the Medicare and Social Security Fair Share Act, that would require wages above $400,000 to be taxed for Social Security.
    “Right now, the cap on Social Security contributions means a tech exec making $1 million effectively stops paying into the program at the end of February, while a schoolteacher making far less contributes their share through every single paycheck all year,” Whitehouse said.
    The bill also aims to correct other unfair features of the system, Whitehouse said, particularly the ability to live off wealth income while making no Social Security contributions. Under the bill, those with more than $400,000 in investment income would contribute to Social Security in the same way as those who earn wages.
    The bill does not propose any benefit cuts.

    Chairman Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., right, and ranking member Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, conduct a Senate Budget Committee hearing, May 4, 2023.
    Tom Williams | Cq-roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images

    Other Democrats also support the idea of making higher earners pay a larger share into the program.
    Rep. Brendan Doyle, D-Pa., has introduced companion legislation to Whitehouse’s proposal in the House.
    Rep. John Larson, D-Conn., and Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., on Wednesday reintroduced the Social Security 2100 Act. The bill, with more than 200 Democratic House co-sponsors, also calls for applying Social Security payroll taxes to earnings of more than $400,000. It would also apply an additional net investment income tax on people making more than $400,000.
    Sens. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., have introduced a separate bill that would instead apply Social Security payroll taxes to incomes over $250,000, while also having the wealthy pay taxes on their investment and business income.

    A tech exec making $1 million effectively stops paying into the program at the end of February, while a schoolteacher making far less contributes their share through every single paycheck all year.

    Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse
    Democratic Senator from Rhode Island

    Polls have shown raising the Social Security payroll tax cap — sometimes attached to a slogan, “Scrap the Cap” — is also popular with the public.
    Yet, at Wednesday’s Senate hearing, some leaders and experts questioned whether that is the right approach.
    “The truth is that taxes on the rich alone won’t save Social Security for our children and grandchildren,” said Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee.
    Democrats’ proposals would push the marginal tax rate to over 50% and many would break President Joe Biden’s promise not to raise taxes on anyone making less than $400,000, Grassley argued.

    “These are tax-heavy messaging bills and not real solutions,” Grassley said.
    Experts who testified at the Senate hearing were also divided on whether higher taxes are the right strategy to pursue to fix the program.
    “Any resolution of this funding gap must be perceived to be fair, yet fairness is in the eye of the beholder,” said Andrew Biggs, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. More

  • in

    Biden administration forgives $39 billion in student debt for more than 800,000 borrowers

    The Biden administration announced it would automatically cancel education debt for 804,000 borrowers, for a total of $39 billion in relief.
    The debt cancellation is a result of the administration’s fixes to repayment plans, which included updated counts of borrowers’ payments.

    President Joe Biden announces new actions on June 30, 2023 to protect borrowers after the Supreme Court struck down his student loan forgiveness plan.
    Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images

    The Biden administration announced Friday it would automatically forgive $39 billion in student debt for 804,000 borrowers.
    The relief is a result of fixes to the student loan system’s income-driven repayment plans. Under those repayment plans, borrowers get any remaining debt canceled by the government after they have made payments for 20 years or 25 years, depending on when they borrowed, and their loan and plan type.

    More from Your Money:

    Here’s a look at more stories on how to manage, grow and protect your money for the years ahead.

    In the past, payments that should have moved a borrower closer to being debt-free were not accounted for, according to the Biden administration.
    “For far too long, borrowers fell through the cracks of a broken system that failed to keep accurate track of their progress towards forgiveness,” U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona said in a statement.
    To bring people over the line for forgiveness, the Biden administration counted payments for borrowers who’d paused their payments in certain deferments and forbearances and those who’d made partial or late payments.
    The announcement comes weeks after the Supreme Court struck down President Joe Biden’s sweeping student loan forgiveness plan, which would have delivered relief to about 37 million people.
    The Education Department will notify eligible borrowers in the coming days. More

  • in

    Hybrid work is the new normal, as companies rethink work habits and office and retail space

    Office attendance has stabilized at 30% below where it was before the Covid-19 pandemic, according to a new report.
    Demand for office space is expected to drop to far below where it was in 2019.
    Changes in office culture are influencing where people live and shop.

    Virojt Changyencham | Moment | Getty Images

    Office demand declines

    That flexibility is helping drive down demand for office space. By 2030, McKinsey predicts, demand for office space will be as much as 20% lower than it was in 2019, depending on the city. While remote and hybrid work is the big reason, the trend toward more desks in less space and shifts to automation were also factored into its analysis. 
    Lower office space demand has companies rethinking how to make their real estate jibe with new work habits. Working in teams and increasing productivity are the top reasons office workers with flexibility give for being on-site. 

    Many office environments are not meeting employees’ needs. Having spaces for employees that are free from noise and distraction so they can work independently is “critical to job performance,” says Jordan Goldstein, a managing principal at architecture firm Gensler.
    Creating what’s called “meeting equity” is also important, so people who are physically in the office and people who are working remotely can conduct business. “The days of a four- to six-person room with a 42-inch flat screen on the wall are over,” said Goldstein. Instead, he suggests employers should create an environment where the virtual and physical offices are brought together. 

    The ripple effect: People moving out

    The evolution in office culture has also changed where people are choosing to live. Of the people surveyed who moved after March 2020, 20% said that their move was possible only because they could now work from home more frequently, according to McKinsey.
    Researchers looked at neighborhoods in San Francisco, Houston and the borough of Manhattan in New York, and found people moved out of expensive, office-dense ZIP codes and into cheaper ones with more mixed use of real estate.

    McKinsey’s comparison of the pandemic’s effect on New York’s Financial District and Lower East Side neighborhood showed that mixed-use neighborhoods, with a diverse offering of office, residential and retail space fared the best.
    The Financial District, which consists of 80% office real estate, a large concentration of workers and an average home price of about $1.5 million saw people leave at more than two times the rate than the Lower East Side, where the average home price is about $500,000 lower and just 7% of real estate is dedicated to office space. 

    Retail demand is changing

    Shopping patterns were also changed by the pandemic, with remote and hybrid workers less likely to spend near the office.
    “Retailers need to rethink their model,” said Jan Mischke, a partner at the McKinsey Global Institute, as foot traffic and and spending continues to be lower — especially in office-dense neighborhoods — and online shopping continues to take market share from stores. “The demand for retail floorspace in 2030 will be lower than it than it [was] in 2019,” he said.
    “We feel we have a sufficient clarity now that it’s relatively clear what needs to happen,” said Mischke. At the city level, that means creating more mixed-use environments, which proved more resilient during the pandemic. More

  • in

    As inflation cools, Social Security beneficiaries may see a much lower cost-of-living adjustment in 2024

    Social Security beneficiaries have seen record high cost-of-living adjustments in recent years due to high inflation.
    But that may end in 2024, experts predict.

    Drazen Zigic | Istock | Getty Images

    As the rate of inflation continues to fall, Social Security beneficiaries may expect to see a much lower cost-of-living adjustment for 2024.
    The Social Security COLA may be 3%, according to a new estimate from The Senior Citizens League, a nonpartisan senior group, based on new consumer price index data for June released on Wednesday.

    The estimate is higher than the 2.7% increase for 2024 the group projected last month due to changes in the average monthly rate of inflation, according to Mary Johnson, Social Security and Medicare policy analyst at The Senior Citizens League.
    More from Personal Finance:Here’s the inflation breakdown for June, in one chartSocial Security phone disruptions have led to longer wait timesHow to protect your money from inflation
    Separately, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget issued its own Social Security COLA estimate on Wednesday that anticipates a benefit increase for 2024 in the range of 2.6% to 3.3%.
    The 3.3% increase would happen if recent inflation trends continue, according to the public policy organization focused on federal budget and fiscal issues. A lower 2.6% rise would happen if there is no net inflation for the rest of the year, according to the forecast.
    The projected increases to benefits for next year would fall short of the 8.7% rise beneficiaries saw in 2023 — the highest boost in four decades. In 2022, beneficiaries saw a 5.9% increase, which was also a record increase at the time.

    Social Security benefits rose by more than $140 per month on average starting in January, according to estimates from the Social Security Administration. The increase applied to about 70 million Social Security and Supplemental Security Income, or SSI, beneficiaries.
    The purpose of the cost-of-living adjustment is to ensure benefits keep up with inflation.
    The largest recorded COLA — 14.3% — went into effect in 1981. In other years — 2010, 2011 and 2016 — beneficiaries saw no benefit increases.

    3 more months of data before official COLA

    To be sure, the estimate is preliminary and may change before the Social Security Administration announces the COLA for 2024 in October.
    “It is not uncommon for this average monthly rate to change,” Johnson said. “That’s what changes every single month and that’s why the COLA estimate changes.”
    The consumer price index rose 3% from one year ago as of June, according to data released Wednesday.

    The Social Security Administration uses a subset of that index — the consumer price index for urban wage earners and clerical workers, or CPI-W — to calculate the annual COLA.
    The COLA is based on the percentage change in the CPI-W from the third quarter of last year to the third quarter of the current year. If there is no increase, there is no COLA.
    The possibility that the COLA could be zero next year looks unlikely, Johnson noted.

    2023 COLA has led to ‘some catching up’

    The 8.7% cost-of-living adjustment has outpaced year-over-year increases in the CPI-W for every month since the increase kicked in in January. The latest June data shows the CPI-W is up 2.3% over the last 12 months.
    In contrast, the 5.9% boost to benefits in 2022 mostly was behind the pace of inflation.
    “There has certainly been some catching up that has occurred,” Johnson said of this year’s benefit increase.
    However, retirees and other beneficiaries may find the cost-of-living adjustment doesn’t necessarily match up with the cost increases they personally see.
    “It’s a very unusual occurrence for it to ever really match up very well,” Johnson said.
    About 53% of beneficiaries have said their actual costs have risen more than the dollar amount of their cost-of-living adjustments, according to The Senior Citizens League’s research. More

  • in

    Nearly 1.5 million taxpayers are ‘leaving money on the table’ as key tax deadline nears, advisor says

    The deadline for past-due filings for 2019 is approaching with an estimated $1.5 billion in unclaimed refunds up for grabs.
    The median refund is $893, according to the IRS, with higher payments in certain states.
    The last chance to file or amend your return from 2019 and claim your refund is July 17.

    damircudic | Getty

    There’s a key tax deadline approaching for past-due filers, with an estimated $1.5 billion in unclaimed refunds up for grabs.
    Nearly 1.5 million taxpayers still have pending refunds from 2019, with a median payment worth $893, according to the IRS. The last chance to file or amend 2019 returns to claim your money is July 17.

    Falling early in the Covid-19 pandemic, the 2019 filing season may not have been a priority for some Americans, said Tommy Lucas, a certified financial planner and enrolled agent at Moisand Fitzgerald Tamayo in Orlando, Florida. “But the fact is, you’re probably leaving money on the table.”
    More from Personal Finance:Aretha Franklin estate battle shows importance of proper willPowerball jackpot hits $725 million. Here’s the tax billHow the Supreme Court’s affirmative action ruling may affect legacy admissions
    Typically, there’s a three-year deadline to claim refunds for unfiled returns. But filers have more time for 2019 because of the Covid-19 pandemic.
    Filing 2019 returns could yield “thousands of dollars,” Lucas said, especially for those claiming the so-called earned income tax credit, a tax break for low- to moderate-income workers.
    The earned income tax credit is “refundable” because you’ll still qualify for a refund when the credit exceeds taxes owed. The tax break may be worth up to $6,557 for eligible filers. “It’s pretty substantial,” Lucas added.

    However, a lot of taxpayers don’t realize they’re forfeiting refunds by missing the three-year filing deadline, said Sheneya Wilson, a certified public accountant and founder of Fola Financial in New York. After July 17, unclaimed refunds for 2019 become the property of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

    How to start the filing process

    Step one in filing your 2019 return is gathering the necessary tax documents. “The first thing that we do as a firm is ask clients to go into their IRS.gov portal,” Wilson said.
    You can login to download IRS transcripts, such as the wage and income transcript, which includes W-2s and 1099s. You can access IRS transcripts for the current season and three prior years.
    “For many taxpayers, this is by far the quickest and easiest option,” according to the IRS.

    If you’re missing forms for income, you can contact your current or past employer. “Most intermediaries and corporations are required to keep tax documents on hand for a minimum of three years,” Wilson said. “So, they should be able to furnish those documents upon request.”

    Take another ‘quick look’ at 2019 returns

    The July 17 deadline is also the last chance to amend your 2019 tax return, said Lucas. “It wouldn’t hurt to take another quick look at your 2019 returns” for missed opportunities, he added.
    For example, you may have skipped dependents, pre-tax individual retirement account contributions or health savings account deposits.
    “If you forgot to put something on the return, you only have three years to get it back,” Lucas said. More

  • in

    ‘This fight is not over’: What to know about Biden’s new plan to forgive student debt

    Immediately after the Supreme Court struck down President Joe Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan, Biden said his administration would pursue a new path to deliver the relief.
    But experts said the alternative strategy could take a year or more to implement, and is likely to face the same legal challenges the first attempt did.
    Still, “there are a number of ways it could go differently,” said Luke Herrine, assistant professor of Law at the University of Alabama.

    President Joe Biden announces new actions on June 30, 2023 to protect borrowers after the Supreme Court struck down his student loan forgiveness plan.
    Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images

    Why did the first forgiveness attempt fail?

    When the president rolled out his plan in August 2022 to forgive as much as $20,000 in education debt for tens of millions of Americans, he pointed to the Heroes Act of 2003 as his legal justification. That law was passed in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and grants the president broad power to revise student loan programs during national emergencies.

    The Covid pandemic was such an emergency, the administration said. The U.S. Department of Education warned that the crisis had left millions of borrowers in a worse off financial situation and that there could be a historic rise in delinquencies and defaults without its loan cancellation.
    Biden’s plan faced at least six lawsuits from Republican-backed states and conservative groups, most of which accused him of executive overreach. At an estimated cost of $400 billion, the policy would have been among the most expensive executive actions in U.S. history.

    Two of the legal challenges made it to the Supreme Court: one brought by six GOP-led states — Nebraska, Missouri, Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas and South Carolina — and another backed by the Job Creators Network Foundation, a conservative advocacy organization.
    It was the states’ case that successfully blocked Biden’s program in the end.
    “Six states sued, arguing that the Heroes Act does not authorize the loan cancellation plan,” wrote Chief Justice John Roberts in the majority opinion for Biden v. Nebraska. “We agree.”
    ″’Can the Secretary use his powers to abolish $430 billion in student loans, completely canceling loan balances for 20 million borrowers, as a pandemic winds down to its end?'” Roberts wrote. “We can’t believe the answer would be yes.”

    What is Biden trying now?

    So why didn’t Biden just use the HEA from the start?

    A few reasons.
    The Biden administration probably first attempted to carry out its plan with the Heroes Act because it specifically addresses national emergencies. The country was in the middle of one of the biggest public health crises in its history.
    When Herrine was writing his paper, “The Law and Political Economy of a Student Debt Jubilee,” he didn’t consider the Heroes Act as a way to cancel education debt simply because the country wasn’t in an emergency state at the time, he said.
    “It’s a statute that’s meant for extraordinary circumstances,” Herrine said.
    Another appealing factor was that the Trump administration had used the same authority to pause federal student loan payments at the start of the pandemic, Herrine said.
    “There’s precedent, right?” Herrine said. “And indeed it was a Republican administration that did it.”

    And because the Heroes Act is an emergency-time measure, it doesn’t require the lengthy rulemaking process that the Higher Education Act typically does (more on that to come).
    Biden had hoped to move quickly canceling people’s student debt, promising people the relief within six weeks of them completing their paperwork.

    How long could this new path take?

    It won’t be speedy, that’s for sure.
    Unlike Biden’s first attempt to forgive student debt quickly through an executive order, this time he’s turning to the rulemaking process. That procedure is lengthier, typically involving a public comment period and other time-consuming steps.
    “Issuing new regulations can take as long as a year,” Kantrowitz said.
    “If the Biden administration is successful in providing loan forgiveness under the HEA,” he went on to say, “borrowers could see forgiveness around the time of the election.”

    Why would this round end any differently?

    It’s unlikely that Biden’s Plan B for student loan forgiveness will be successful, Kantrowitz said.
    He expects the president’s second attempt at forgiving student debt to be met by many of the same lawsuits as the first. And if those challenges make it to the Supreme Court again, borrowers can brace for déjà vu.
    Herrine agreed that was a plausible scenario.
    “The Supreme Court is going to be skeptical of basically any interpretation,” Herrine said.
    However, he added, “there are a number of ways it could go differently.”

    The Supreme Court is going to be skeptical of basically any interpretation.

    Luke Herrine
    assistant professor of Law at the University of Alabama

    For one, the president didn’t go through the rulemaking process before. “And those are the sort of things that courts are supposed to defer to more,” Herrine said.
    During the procedure, the Biden administration may also narrow the scope of his forgiveness plan. For example, he could decide to specify that only those who’ve already been paying their loans for a long time or who’ve repeatedly defaulted, are eligible.
    “That would be a relief for a lot of people and I think it would be easier to justify in front of a court that is skeptical of broad authority,” Herrine said.
    Even if this round leads to failure again, Herrine doubts the push for student loan forgiveness will fade anytime soon.
    “I think we’re going to see more momentum in Congress and maybe some more alternative means to do it,” he said. “It’ll be hard to put the toothpaste back in the tube.” More

  • in

    Here’s the inflation breakdown for June, in one chart

    The consumer price index was up 3% in June from 12 months earlier, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics said Wednesday in its monthly inflation report.
    It’s the smallest increase since March 2021, around the time when pandemic-era inflation began rising quickly.
    The moderation in inflation has been broad-based, and there are encouraging signs looking ahead, economists said.
    The Federal Reserve is still expected to raise interest rates at least one more time.

    A shopper at Lincoln Market in Brooklyn, New York, on June 12, 2023.
    Michael M. Santiago | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    Inflation slowed sharply in June to its slowest pace in more than two years, translating to less of a pinch on the average consumer’s wallet thanks to price relief across categories like energy, groceries and housing.
    Inflation measures how quickly prices are changing across the U.S. economy.

    The consumer price index increased 3% in June relative to a year earlier — a slowdown from 4% in May, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    The CPI is a key barometer of inflation, measuring prices of anything from fruits and vegetables to haircuts and concert tickets. June’s reading is the smallest 12-month increase since March 2021 — around the time when alarm bells started sounding about fast-rising prices in the pandemic era — and a significant pullback from 9.1% in June 2022.

    The report “makes a strong case that inflation is headed back into the bottle,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics.
    Easing price pressures thus far are largely attributable to the fading effects of supply shocks caused by the Covid pandemic and the Russian war in Ukraine, Zandi said.
    The decline in the inflation rate doesn’t mean household expenses have fallen in aggregate; it means they aren’t rising as quickly.

    And that’s good news for consumers: The average worker’s earnings growth is now outpacing inflation, translating to an increase in their standard of living after two years of declines. Hourly earnings increased 0.2%, on average, from May to June after accounting for inflation, according to BLS data.
    While inflation is on a downward trajectory, it remains above the Federal Reserve’s long-term target of around 2%.
    “I think inflation is moving to a better place, but we’re not in the Promised Land of the 2% target,” said Mark Hamrick, senior economic analyst at Bankrate. “We know the journey is progressing, but it’s not yet over.”

    ‘Encouraging’ inflation signals moving forward

    The inflation slowdown has been broad-based, Zandi said.
    “It’s food, it’s energy, vehicle prices, the cost of housing is slowing,” he said. “Pretty much across the board, we’re seeing a moderation in price increases.”
    Gasoline prices have fallen dramatically from a spike in the first half of 2022 that was a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Prices at the pump are down almost 27% in the past year, according to the BLS. They rose slightly — by 1% — from May to June.

    Grocery price inflation is also down significantly from its peak around 14% last summer, which had been the highest rate since 1979. “Food at home” prices are up about 5% in the past year and were flat from May to June, according to the BLS.
    But food and energy prices can be volatile. That’s why economists use a measure that strips out such categories to get a better sense of inflation’s trajectory going forward.
    The measure — so-called “core CPI” — hit a 20-month low of 4.8%, according to Andrew Hunter, deputy chief U.S. economist at Capital Economics. And it’s “potentially even more encouraging than it looks,” as wholesale auction data for used cars points to a sharp decline in prices over the next couple of months, he said in a research note.
    More from Personal Finance:Other countries don’t have an issue with ‘tipflation’How to protect your money from inflationWhy it’s nearly impossible to find a car for less than $30,000
    The “core” measure also includes housing, which is the biggest expense for the average consumer.
    The “shelter” index was the largest contributor to inflation in June, accounting for 70% of the monthly increase, according to the BLS. Shelter prices are up nearly 8% in the past year, but moderated from May to June. Economists say it’s a near certainty that housing prices will continue to fall through the second half of the year.
    At the current pace of inflation, the core CPI metric should fall back to the target level by this time next year, Zandi said.

    We know the journey is progressing, but it’s not yet over.

    Mark Hamrick
    senior economic analyst at Bankrate

    “Notable” increases in annual inflation rates include motor vehicle insurance (up 16.9%), recreation (4.3%), household furnishings and operations (3.6%), and new vehicles (4.1%), according to the BLS.
    However, several categories actually saw deflation — meaning consumers saw average prices fall — in the month from May to June, the BLS said. They include airline fares (which declined 8.1% in that period), which followed declines in April and May, too. There was also a 0.5% monthly decline in the “communication” index, which includes expenses such as phones and computer software.

    Inflation is a ‘complicated phenomenon’

    Inflation during the pandemic era has been a “complicated phenomenon” stemming from “multiple sources and complex dynamic interactions,” according to a paper published in May and co-authored by Ben Bernanke, former chair of the U.S. Federal Reserve, and Olivier Blanchard, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    At a high level, inflationary pressures — which have been felt globally — are due to an imbalance between supply and demand.
    It’s largely a three-pronged story in the U.S., said Stephanie Roth, senior markets economist at J.P. Morgan Private Bank.
    The first is inflation among physical goods.

    Consumer prices began rising rapidly in early 2021 as the U.S. economy reopened after its Covid-induced shutdown. Americans unleashed a flurry of pent-up demand for dining out, entertainment and vacations, aided by savings amassed from government relief, months of curbed spending and rock-bottom borrowing costs.
    Meanwhile, the rapid economic restart snarled global supply chains. The supply of goods couldn’t keep up with consumers’ zest to spend. The result was fast-rising prices.
    The second prong is war in Ukraine, which exacerbated backlogs in the global supply chain and fueled higher prices for food, energy and other commodities, said Roth.
    The third is inflation for “services,” a category that includes housing and labor-intensive service businesses like restaurants and hotels.

    Pretty much across the board, we’re seeing a moderation in price increases.

    Mark Zandi
    chief economist at Moody’s Analytics

    As the economy reopened after the pandemic, businesses rushed to hire workers, and job openings surged to record highs. That demand tilted the job market in favor of workers, who had ample opportunities. They saw wages grow at their fastest pace in decades as employers competed to hire them.
    That strong wage growth has nudged employers, especially labor-intensive service businesses, to raise prices to help compensate for higher labor costs, economists said. There are signs that labor dynamic is easing, though — which should put downward pressure on overall inflation.
    The Federal Reserve has been raising borrowing costs aggressively since early 2022 to rein in demand among consumers and businesses, and ultimately help bring inflation back to its 2% annual target. The central bank is expected to raise interest rates at least once more. More