More stories

  • in

    Here’s the inflation breakdown for August 2024 — in one chart

    The consumer price index rose 2.5% in August 2024, on an annual basis, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said.
    That CPI inflation reading is the lowest since February 2021.
    Inflation has gradually declined, but a few categories, such as housing, remain stubbornly high.
    The Federal Reserve is expected to start cutting interest rates, since inflation has moderated.

    Grace Cary | Moment | Getty Images

    Inflation continued to throttle back in August, signaling that the fast-rising prices that plagued the U.S. economy for the better part of three years during the pandemic era are increasingly moving into the rearview mirror.
    Overall inflationary pressures are “dissipating,” said Sarah House, senior economist at Wells Fargo Economics.

    The consumer price index — which measures how fast prices are changing across the U.S. economy — rose 2.5% in August from a year ago, the U.S. Department of Labor reported Wednesday.
    That figure is down from 2.9% in July and is the lowest reading since February 2021.

    There are still some pockets of potential concern, however, with housing perhaps the most troubling among them, economists said. But prices for staples such as groceries and gasoline have normalized and the inflationary trend appears firmly to the downside, they said.
    “We’d expect inflation to continue to subside,” though with “some ups and downs” in the data from month to month, House said.

    ‘Tamed’ but not ‘vanquished’

    The August inflation reading is down significantly from the 9.1% pandemic-era peak in mid-2022, which was the highest level since 1981.

    It’s also nearing policymakers’ long-term target of around 2%.
    “Overall, inflation appears to have been successfully tamed but, with housing inflation still refusing to moderate as quickly as hoped, it hasn’t been completely vanquished,” Paul Ashworth, chief North America economist at Capital Economics, wrote in a note Wednesday morning.

    With that in mind, the U.S. Federal Reserve is expected to start cutting interest rates this month as its focus shifts from tackling inflation to averting recession in the face of a cooling job market.
    The central bank raised rates to their highest level in 23 years during the pandemic era, pushing up borrowing costs for consumers and businesses in a bid to tame inflation.
    Both House and Ashworth expect the Fed to cut rates by a quarter of a percentage point at its upcoming policy meeting next week.

    Housing inflation is falling but still high

    Inflation for physical goods spiked as the U.S. economy reopened in 2021.
    The Covid-19 pandemic disrupted supply chains, while Americans spent more on their homes and less on services such as dining out and entertainment. Supply shortages coincided with higher consumer demand.
    Services inflation — which is generally more sensitive to labor costs — also jumped, partly influenced by a historically hot labor market as employers clamored for workers when the economy reopened, economists said.
    More from Personal Finance:The ‘vibecession’ is ending as U.S. economy nails a soft landingU.S. job market slows but not yet a ‘three-alarm fire’Relocating retirees want lower costs of living and better lifestyles
    Housing, which is counted in the “services” category, has been a big impediment to overall inflation falling to the Fed’s target, economists said.
    Shelter is the largest component of the CPI and therefore has an outsized effect on inflation readings.
    The shelter index has risen 5.2% since August 2023, accounting for more than 70% of the annual increase in the “core” CPI, the Bureau of Labor Statistic, or BLS, said Wednesday. The core CPI is economists’ preferred gauge of inflation trends; it strips out food and energy costs, which can be volatile.

    Housing inflation moves up and down at glacial speed due to how the government measures it, economists said.
    Such data quirks mask positive news in the real-time rental market, which has seen minimal inflation for about two years, economists said. Average rents actually deflated, meaning prices actually fell, by 1% in the second quarter of 2024 versus a year earlier, according to the BLS New Tenant Rent Index.

    However, shelter CPI inflation has appeared to defy gravity lately: It increased on a monthly basis for two consecutive months, from 0.2% in June to 0.4% in July, and then to 0.5% in August.
    “It’s puzzling, in all honesty,” House said. “[But] I’m of the view that we should continue to see shelter decelerate” given broader trends in the rental market.

    Other ‘notable’ categories

    More broadly, other categories with “notable increases” over the past year include motor vehicle insurance, where prices are up 16.5% from August 2023; medical care, up 3%; recreation, up 1.6%; and education, up 3.1%, the BLS said.
    A surge in new and used car prices a few years ago is likely now fueling high inflation for car insurance premiums and vehicle repair, since it generally costs more to insure and repair pricier cars, economists said.

    Insurance inflation should ultimately fade alongside falling car prices, they said. New vehicle prices are down about 1% over the past year, and those for used cars and trucks have declined more than 10%.
    Egg prices — which had surged in 2022 due to a historic outbreak of bird flu — are rising again following a reemergence of the deadly disease. They’re up 28% from a year ago.
    Overall annual grocery inflation was less than 1% in August, down from an average 11.4% in 2022, which was the highest since 1979.
    Gasoline prices are also down about 10% over the past year. More

  • in

    Avoid ‘knee-jerk reactions’ to candidates’ proposed tax increases, financial advisors say. Here’s why

    With fewer than 60 days until the election, investors may feel stressed by the flurry of tax policy proposals. Those emotions can trigger rash financial decisions, experts say.
    But tax law changes require Congressional approval and future control of the House and Senate remains uncertain.
    “We don’t make any changes until the law has passed,” said CFP Louis Barajas, CEO of International Private Wealth Advisors.

    People watch the presidential debate between Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump and Democratic presidential nominee and U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris at a watch party hosted by the New York Young Republican Club, in New York City, U.S., September 10, 2024. 
    Adam Gray | Reuters

    With fewer than 60 days until the election, investors may feel stressed by the flurry of tax policy proposals. Those emotions can trigger rash financial decisions, experts say.
    Democratic presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris has plans for middle-class tax cuts while raising levies on the wealthiest Americans and corporations.

    Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump, the Republican nominee, aims to extend tax breaks enacted during his first term and end taxes on Social Security benefits. Trump also supports higher tariffs, or taxes levied on imported goods from another country.
    “There are sometimes knee-jerk reactions to some of these proposals,” said certified financial planner and enrolled agent Louis Barajas, who is CEO of International Private Wealth Advisors in Irvine, California.
    More from Personal Finance:Social Security cost-of-living increase for 2025 could be 2.5%Here’s the inflation breakdown for August 2024 — in one chartHarris wants a 28% capital gains tax rate. How it compares to recent history
    But there’s a big difference between a candidate’s tax idea or proposal and signed legislation. Tax law changes require Congressional approval, and future control of the House and Senate remains uncertain.
    “All sorts of things are in presidential budgets that don’t get enacted,” said CFP and financial therapist Rick Kahler, president of Kahler Financial Group in Rapid City, South Dakota. 

    Trump’s expiring tax cuts

    We don’t make any changes until the law has passed.

    Louis Barajas
    nternational Private Wealth Advisors

    “We don’t make any changes until the law has passed,” said Barajas, who is a member of CNBC’s Financial Advisor Council. Actions based on proposed tax law can backfire if the legislation isn’t enacted or details change amid lawmaker debates.
    Plus, tax decisions need to align with long-term financial plans, he added.

    Fear often comes from a ‘scarcity mindset’

    Our emotions drive the vast majority of financial decisions, according to Kahler.
    When a candidate proposes tax increases, “a scarcity mindset” often leads investors to believe that higher taxes will significantly reduce their resources, he said.
    But regardless of your finances, you should “never make a decision when there is a strong emotion driving you,” Kahler said.
    “If you’re scared to death, this is a good time to take a deep breath,” he said. “Emotions can get in the way of making a clean decision.” More

  • in

    Bitcoin could soon hit six figures regardless of who wins U.S. election, investors say

    Watch Daily: Monday – Friday, 3 PM ET

    Jonathan Raa | Nurphoto | Getty Images

    Despite the increasingly partisan sentiment in the cryptocurrency industry, bitcoin will thrive over the long term regardless of who wins the U.S. presidential election in November.
    That’s a view many crypto investors are coming to accept, as the wave of optimism spurred by former President Donald Trump’s pro-crypto overtures this summer starts to recede.

    “Do I think we’ll be in the six figures by 2025? Almost certainly. Do I think we’ll be in the six figures regardless of who wins? Almost certainly,” said Steven Lubka, head of private clients and family offices at Swan Bitcoin. 
    “Bitcoin has always been an investment that is rooted more in the fiscal and monetary profile of countries, sovereigns and the United States,” Lubka added. “Neither candidate changes that.”
    Fears that a Kamala Harris presidency would somehow limit the price of bitcoin or drive it lower are overblown, said James Davies, co-founder at crypto trading platform Crypto Valley Exchange. Crypto startups may be more challenged, but the industry will continue to fight its way forward and thrive, he noted. It helps that bitcoin became more institutionalized than ever this year with the introduction of U.S. bitcoin exchange traded funds.
    “Some of our communities … have become echo chambers and are convinced the sky will fall if one side or the other wins,” Davies said. “The truth is that the market is robust, not centered on the U.S., and hasn’t reacted negatively to major events from either side” of the partisan divide.
    “This is about opportunities and regulation for U.S.-based users, not[the] price of a global commodity,” he added. “Crypto needs to learn from traditional finance, it needs to lobby both sides, align with both sides and succeed regardless of the election. If we want to build a big eco-system, we cannot afford to be partisan.”

    Exaggerated risk
    Lubka agreed that some observers “overplay the risks of a Harris presidency” because of the hostility the industry experienced during the Biden administration. That said, he added, “all of the signposts that we’re seeing with Harris continually represent a de-escalation” of the Biden-era crypto rhetoric.
    “The election results will have minimal effects on how bitcoin performs over the next 12 to18 months,” said Tyrone Ross, founder and president of registered investment advisor 401 Financial. “There’s still a lot of firms working through ETF access, there’s rate cuts coming and trading by retail at the centralized custodians are at their lows. [It] definitely will be harder for young startups, but as a developing institutional grade, quality asset it will continue to prove itself no matter who is in office.”
    Bitcoin has traded between $55,000 and $70,000 for most of 2024, after reaching its all-time high above $73,000 in March. Investors have widely expected the price to continue in this lull until U.S. voters decide the next president. Election news, however, has lately had less of an impact on bitcoin’s price, which is more influenced by macroeconomic developments.
    After the debate on Tuesday night between Harris and Trump, bitcoin fell about 3%, although investors attributed that to interest rate updates in Japan and some positioning around U.S. inflation data for August that was released early Wednesday.
    Growing partisan sentiment
    In recent months, it had been speculated that the election would serve as an immediate catalyst for bitcoin – with many characterizing a potential second Trump presidency as a boon for the industry. The former president, for example, addressed the annual Bitcoin Conference in late July in Nashville, and ensured a reference was made a priority in the Republican Party Platform. This week, analysts at Bernstein said the way to invest in a potential Trump presidency is through bitcoin, adding that that if he wins on Nov. 5, the cryptocurrency could break to a new all-time high around $80,000. A Harris victory, however, could push bitcoin toward $40,000, Bernstein said.
    “If Trump wins in November, will there be an immediate pump? Yes, absolutely. If Harris wins, could there be some immediate sell pressure? That certainly wouldn’t surprise me. But over the medium term, I don’t think that’s the dynamic,” said Lubka of Swan Bitcoin.
    Vice President Harris has not shared a public view on crypto but parts of the industry are concerned she’s antagonistic to crypto and shares views of Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler that are thought to be holding back crypto adoption.
    “There hasn’t been clear statements, but there has been a bad history under the Biden administration … so I understand why people are paying attention,” Lubka said. 
    Although there are concerns thanks to the Biden administration’s position on bitcoin, “I would remind investors … that bitcoin did great,” under the current adminustration, Lubka added. It “has been one of the most successful assets in the world during a period where everyone was opposed to it. Governments have traditionally been at least mildly hostile to bitcoin during its whole history, and it’s done extremely well.”
    Bitcoin has been the top performing asset in all but three years since 2012. 

    Daniel Cawrey, chief strategy officer at crypto wallet operator Tonkeeper, said there will likely be a short-term rally or muted market reaction depending on the eventual winner in November but that, either way, crypto is already better off this election season.
    “This election has brought the crypto conversation to the forefront … Biden has pretty much ignored the industry,” Cawrey said. “Unlike Biden, however, Harris has not been taking a hands-off approach to crypto since elevating to be the Democratic nominee. Her campaign has been talking with stakeholders in the industry, which could mean better guidelines, which the industry needs.”

    Don’t miss these cryptocurrency insights from CNBC PRO: More

  • in

    Americans have more than $32 trillion in home equity — a record high. Here’s what to know before you tap it

    U.S. homeowners are sitting on $32 trillion in home equity, a fresh all-time high. 
    There are various options for tapping your home for cash, including a cash-out refinance, a home equity loan and a home equity line of credit.
    In each case, however, high borrowing costs make it harder to access housing wealth. Here’s a look at where those rates stand.

    Thanks to the runup in housing prices, homeowners now have more than $32 trillion in home equity as of the first quarter of 2024, according to the St. Louis Federal Reserve — an all-time high.
    “It’s one of the very few things we can say about today’s housing market that is, more or less, positive,” said Jacob Channel, senior economic analyst at LendingTree.

    While the average borrower sits on roughly $214,000 in equity that can be tapped, 60% of homeowners have at least $100,000, the Intercontinental Exchange’s Mortgage Monitor also found. Tappable equity is the amount most lenders will allow you to take out while still leaving 20% in the home as a cushion.
    Rising home prices have “continued to build the fortunes of existing homeowners, pushing tappable equity to its highest level ever,” said Andy Walden, vice president of research and analysis at the Intercontinental Exchange.

    How to tap your home for cash

    Although homeowners are sitting on a record amount of housing wealth, the cost of borrowing against your home is also near the highest it’s been in recent years largely due to a series of rate hikes by the Federal Reserve, according to Greg McBride, chief financial analyst at Bankrate.com.
    High interest rates makes access to home equity more challenging.
    “There’s a long-held sense that it’s a cheap source of funds, but that paradigm has changed,” McBride said.

    More from Personal Finance:Is this the right time to buy a home? Experts weigh inHomeowners say roughly 5% rate is tipping point to moveMore unmarried couples are buying homes together
    In the aftermath of the pandemic, many existing homeowners refinanced their mortgage when interest rates hit rock bottom and pocketed the difference as a lump sum.
    Currently, with mortgage rates around 6.3%, fewer homeowners are jumping at the chance to do a cash-out refinance.
    “As rates come down, you might see more opportunities for a cash-out refi, but nobody is going to confuse it with 2021,” McBride said, referring to the period of “ultra-low” rates after the Fed slashed its benchmark to near zero.
    And yet, some homeowners are already more willing to refinance now that mortgage rates are down from recent highs — as of the latest reading, mortgage refinance demand is more than 100% higher than a year ago.

    Alternatively, a home equity loan is a type of second mortgage, which allows borrowers to pull cash while using the house as collateral. In this case, the loan comes as a lump sum with a fixed rate.
    “A home equity loan could be a good option for homeowners who want to raise money to pay for renovations, either to make the home more to their liking, or to fix it up before selling the home next year,” said Holden Lewis, home and mortgage expert at NerdWallet.
    However, the current average home equity loan interest rate is 8.52%, according to Bankrate, notably higher than a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage.
    In this case, as well, “elevated rates have contributed to homeowners’ reluctance to take out fixed-rate home equity loans,” Lewis said, “but some of that trepidation will melt as rates drop.”

    Otherwise, a home equity line of credit, also known as a HELOC, lets you borrow money against a portion of your home’s equity. Instead of taking out a home loan at a fixed amount, a HELOC is a revolving line of credit — but with better rates than a credit card — that you can use when you want to or just have on hand.
    The average HELOC interest rate is just shy of 10%, according to Bankrate. While those rates are high compared with the typical mortgage or home loan, they are significantly lower than what it costs to borrow on credit cards, which charge more than 20%, on average.

    Factor in the terms, rates and risks

    Of course, different lenders will also offer different terms and interest rates, according to LendingTree’s Channel.
    Channel recommends talking to several mortgage companies or loan officers, as well as weighing all of the costs before deciding what course of action makes the most sense.
    When it comes to borrowing against your home, the rate and terms of a loan are not the only considerations, he added. There are also risks associated with tapping your home for cash.
    “Defaulting on a home equity loan can have serious negative consequences,” Channel said.
    Chief among them is that failure to pay back a home equity loan can result in foreclosure, he said. Even if it doesn’t, it can still ruin your credit and otherwise make it much harder for you to get approved for another loan — regardless of the type.
    “The best piece of advice is to be thorough and to plan ahead,” Channel said. “Make sure you are in position that whatever you borrow, you will be able to pay back. This isn’t one of those things you should try to wing.”
    Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube. More

  • in

    Social Security cost-of-living increase for 2025 could be 2.5% — the lowest since 2021, estimate finds

    As inflation subsides, Social Security beneficiaries are poised to see a lower benefit increase next year.
    A new estimate points to a 2.5% cost-of-living adjustment, or COLA, in 2025, which would be closer to the average increase beneficiaries typically receive.
    The Social Security Administration is expected to announce the official cost-of-living adjustment for 2025 next month.

    Patchareeporn Sakoolchai | Moment | Getty Images

    Social Security beneficiaries have seen higher cost-of-living adjustments in recent years, prompted by record high inflation.
    Yet next year’s increase may not be as generous.

    Based on new government inflation data, beneficiaries may see just a 2.5% increase to benefits in 2025, estimates Mary Johnson, an independent Social Security and Medicare analyst.
    In 2024, more than 71 million Americans — including Social Security and Supplemental Security Income beneficiaries — saw a 3.2% cost-of-living adjustment, according to the Social Security Administration.
    A spike in inflation drove the annual benefit boost even higher in 2023, when there was an 8.7% increase, the highest in four decades. That followed a 5.9% raise in 2022, which at the time also marked a recent high.
    In 2021, the cost-of-living adjustment was 1.3%.

    If a 2.5% COLA goes into effect in 2025, it would be about average, according to Johnson.

    Importantly, the estimate for the 2025 Social Security cost-of-living adjustment is subject to change.
    The Social Security Administration is poised to announce the official increase to benefits in October. That will include new government inflation data for September. The current 2.5% estimate has about a 17% chance of increasing and a 13% chance of decreasing, according to Johnson.
    The annual Social Security cost-of-living adjustment is calculated using third-quarter data from a subset of the consumer price index, known as the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, or CPI-W.  
    Two factors tend to affect the net amount retirees receive from Social Security amid high inflation, the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College has found – taxes on benefits and Medicare Part B premiums.

    Trump calls for ending taxes on benefits

    Up to 85% of Social Security benefits may be subject to federal income taxes.
    Those taxes are applied to combined income, which is the sum of half your Social Security benefits, total adjusted gross income and nontaxable interest.
    Because those thresholds do not change, more beneficiaries are paying taxes on benefits over time.
    Former President Donald Trump has called for ending taxes on Social Security benefits as part of his campaign platform.
    Trump re-upped his plans to “help seniors on fixed incomes” with “no tax on Social Security benefits” in a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, on Sept. 9.

    Currently, if your combined income as an individual tax filer is between $25,000 and $34,000 — or between $32,000 and $44,000 if married and filing jointly — you may pay taxes on up to 50% of your benefits.
    If your combined income is more than $34,000 and you file individually — or if you’re married and file jointly and have more than $44,000 in combined income — up to 85% of your benefits may be taxed.
    Trump’s plan to eliminate those taxes would have consequences for both the Social Security and Medicare Hospital Insurance trust funds, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, with deficits increasing by an estimated $1.6 trillion to $1.8 trillion through 2035.
    More from Personal Finance:Here’s the inflation breakdown for August 2024 — in one chartHow Harris’ plans for a 28% capital gains tax compares to recent historyThe ‘vibecession’ is ending as U.S. economy nails soft landing
    Eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits is a “supremely unhelpful idea,” since that money helps cover the program’s spending and helps make it progressive, Alicia Munnell, director at the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, recently wrote.
    However, taxes on benefits could be better structured, with new income thresholds indexed for inflation and adjustments to the share of benefits to be included in adjustable gross income, according to Munnell.
    Trump’s campaign did not respond to an immediate request for comment.

    Medicare Part B premiums becoming more expensive

    Many retirees have monthly premium payments for Medicare Part B — which covers physician, outpatient hospital and some home health services — deducted directly from their Social Security benefit checks.
    Yet while Medicare Part B premiums go up by 5.5% per year on average, Social Security cost-of-living adjustments average 2.6% annually, according to a new analysis by Johnson.
    Consequently, premium costs take up an increasingly large share of Social Security benefits.

    Over the past two decades, Medicare Part B premiums and deductibles grew at double the rate of Social Security’s cost-of-living adjustments, Johnson said.
    From 2005 to 2024, Medicare Part B premiums grew by 109.9 percentage points, while Social Security cost-of-living-adjustments totaled 52.5 percentage points.
    The dramatic difference is due in part to Medicare costs not being factored into the annual Social Security COLA calculations, Johnson explained. More

  • in

    Trump wants to make IVF free. Democrats, Republicans and experts are dubious

    Former President Donald Trump says that he wants to make in vitro fertilization treatments free for all women who need it.
    However, health care experts are skeptical Trump could implement such a policy through an executive action.
    Finding support in Congress, meanwhile, could be exceptionally difficult.

    Former U.S. President and current Republican Presidential nominee Donald Trump speaks about the economy, inflation, and manufacturing during a campaign event at Alro Steel on August 29, 2024 in Potterville, Michigan. 
    Bill Pugliano | Getty Images

    Former President Donald Trump says that he wants to make in vitro fertilization treatments free of cost, either by requiring insurance companies to cover the procedure or federally funding it.
    “Because we want more babies, to put it very nicely,” Trump said at a campaign rally in Michigan on Aug. 29.

    Since then, neither Trump nor his campaign has offered details on how such a plan might be paid for. Still, his verbal support brought the fertility treatments to the center of a presidential race where both Trump and Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris are vying for the votes of politically moderate women.
    But health care experts are skeptical that Trump could implement such a policy on his own. And winning support for free IVF among his fellow Republicans in Congress could prove exceptionally difficult.
    “The ability of the executive to do this unilaterally is quite limited,” said Alina Salganicoff, a senior vice president and the director of the Women’s Health Policy Program at KFF.
    Mandating that insurers pay for IVF would require legislation in Congress, Salganicoff said. Another potential option would be to convince a panel of experts to add IVF to the list of fully covered women’s preventative services under the Affordable Care Act. This would pose several challenges, not least of which is that Trump has tried to repeal the ACA.
    It would also be difficult for members of Congress to rationalize making a single treatment like IVF free, said Sabrina Corlette, co-director of the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University’s McCourt School of Public Policy.

    “What about chemotherapy? What about insulin? What about any other number of life-saving services that people need?” she said.
    Having the government pay for IVF would similarly require an act of Congress. Lawmakers need to allocate the funds, and the cost of such a program would likely be eye-popping, experts said.
    A single cycle of IVF costs over $23,000, according to FertilityIQ. Many women need four or more cycles to have a successful birth.

    Maskot | Maskot | Getty Images

    Another concern is that insurers required to cover IVF treatments would pass on these extra costs to consumers, said Corlette.
    “We’re talking about an expensive service, and if you reduce all financial barriers to it, it would add to premiums for sure,” Corlette said.
    Trump “supports universal access to contraception and IVF,” Karoline Leavitt, the Trump campaign’s national press secretary, told CNBC in response to a question about the proposal. Leavitt declined to address how this might be paid for.
    These are likely some of the reasons that Harris, who has positioned herself as a champion for women’s reproductive rights, hasn’t come out with a similar proposal, Salganicoff said.
    “My sense is that they realize the complexities involved,” Salganicoff said, speaking of the Harris campaign.
    Former Rep. Bakari Sellers, D-S.C., a Harris ally, challenged the basic notion that what Trump has said about IVF even counts as a policy proposal.
    “It’s a silly proposition to ask is Kamala Harris going to chase Donald Trump on any issue that deals with reproductive rights,” Sellers told CNBC.
    “He said one sentence about IVF. That’s not a policy, it’s an idea that hasn’t been thoroughly vetted by anyone,” said Sellers.

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    Besides Trump’s comments that he would cover “all costs” of IVF, his campaign hasn’t released any formal proposal.
    Trump’s own platform “could effectively ban IVF” nationwide, said Sarafina Chitika, a spokesperson for the Harris campaign. Chitika pointed to the 2024 GOP platform and reports that it would encourage states to establish fetal personhood.
    Because Trump overturned Roe v. Wade, IVF is already under attack and women’s freedoms have been ripped away in states across the country,” Chitika said. “There is only one candidate in this race who trusts women and will protect our freedom to make our own health care decisions: Vice President Kamala Harris.”
    Senate Republicans in June blocked legislation that would guarantee women the right to IVF treatments. Meanwhile, only 39% of Republicans said it was “morally acceptable” to destroy the frozen human embryos created by IVF, Gallup found the same month.
    As a result, Trump might find it hardest to get support from his own party to institute a universal IVF program, experts said.
    The GOP record on regulating health insurance companies also doesn’t bode well for Trump’s plan, said Corlette.
    “They’ve all been for reducing the mandates on insurers,” she said. More

  • in

    Wednesday’s big stock stories: What’s likely to move the market in the next trading session

    Traders work on the floor at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City, U.S., September 9, 2024. 
    Brendan Mcdermid | Reuters

    Stocks @ Night is a daily newsletter delivered after hours, giving you a first look at tomorrow and last look at today. Sign up for free to receive it directly in your inbox.
    Here’s what CNBC TV’s producers were watching as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite posted back-to-back winning days and what’s on the radar for the next session.

    Oil and energy

    OPEC lowered its demand forecast for the second time in two months.
    A quarter of the rigs in the Gulf of Mexico have been shut down ahead of Tropical Storm Francine, which is expected to become a hurricane and make landfall in Louisiana on Wednesday.
    West Texas Intermediate futures fell 4.3% to settle at $65.75 on Tuesday. That’s the lowest settle since December 2021.
    Brent futures fell 3.7% Tuesday and settled at $69.19, the lowest settle since December 2021.
    Energy is the worst performing S&P sector in September. That’s the case for the one-, three-, and six-month periods, as well as year to date and the past 12 months.
    The sector is 13.4% from the April 5 52-week high.
    EQT is the worst performer in three months, down 22%.
    Coterra is down 19.5% in three months.
    APA is down 19% in three months.
    Halliburton is down 18% in three months.
    Occidental is down 15% in three months.
    ExxonMobil and Chevron are both down 6% in September.

    Stock chart icon

    EQT’s performance over the past three months

    The banks, Basel III and beyond — and the Great American Consumer

    New rules and regulations regarding global banking weren’t as impactful as feared. However, the industry was hit by a few factors on Tuesday, including JPMorgan’s lowered expectations for net interest income for next year and Ally Financial’s statement the consumer was showing signs of struggle.
    Ally dropped 17.6% Tuesday. Shares are 28% from the 52-week high hit July 31.
    JPMorgan dropped 5%. It is 8% from the Aug. 30 high.
    Goldman Sachs fell 4.4% Tuesday. The stock is 9.7% from the July 31 high.
    Citigroup fell 2.7%. The stock is 14.5% from the 52-week high.
    Morgan Stanley fell 1.6%. It’s down 11.5% from the July 16 high.
    Wells Fargo fell 1.17% Tuesday. The stock is 13.75% from the mid-May high.
    Bank of America fell 0.5%. The stock is 11.6% from the mid-July high. CEO Brian Moynihan told CNBC TV’s Sara Eisen on Tuesday that he had more confidence in the American consumer and didn’t see anything to worry about. “The consumer is not getting worse right now, they’re very stable” he said.
    The SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF (KRE) fell 0.87% Tuesday. It is 8% from the July 31 high.

    BMW and the auto sector

    BMW fell about 11% in European trading Tuesday. The company said it was seeing weakness in Asia and worried about high costs related to a recent recall.
    General Motors dropped 5.4%. The stock is 11% from the 52-week high.
    Ford fell 3.2% Tuesday. The stock is 30% from the July high.
    Honda is down 2%. Shares are 19% from the March high.
    Toyota was down 1% Tuesday. The stock is 32% from the March high.

    Stock chart icon

    General Motors’ year-to-date performance

    Cannabis stocks

    CNBC TV’s Brandon Gomez covers the beat and will report on how the sector may do in either a Kamala Harris or Donald Trump administration.
    The sector has been strong in the last week since Trump said he’d back legalization in his home state of Florida.
    Canopy Growth is up 7% in two days, but it’s still 75% from the high reached nearly a year ago.
    Aurora is up 4.8% in two days. It’s down more than 50% from the high reached last September.
    Tilray is up about 5% in two days, about 50% from the high reached about a year ago.

    Inflation data

    Stock chart icon

    U.S. 10-year Treasury yield in 2024

    REIT run

    Five players in the real estate investment trust space hit multi-year highs on Tuesday. Those names are Crown Castle, Equity Residential, Essex Property Trust, Mid-America Apartment Communities and UDR.
    Crown Castle is up 20% in three months.
    Equity Residential is up 16.4% in three months.
    Essex Property Trust is up 14.4% in three months.
    Mid-America Apartment Communities is up 18% in three months.
    UDR is up 14.5% in three months.
    The S&P Real Estate index is up 18% in three months. More

  • in

    Harris wants to raise the top capital gains tax rate to 28%. How that compares with recent history

    Democratic presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris last week proposed a 28% tax on long-term capital gains, or assets owned for more than one year, for those making more than $1 million annually.
    If she raised the net investment income tax to 5%, top earners would pay a combined rate of 33%.
    Harris’ combined 33% capital gains rate for top earners would be the highest since 1978. But the average effective rate — what investors actually pay — is typically lower, experts say.

    U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, U.S. August 20, 2024 and former U.S. President Donald Trump in Bedminster, New Jersey, U.S., August 15, 2024 are seen in a combination of file photographs. 
    Marco Bello | Jeenah Moon | Reuters

    As the election ramps up, many investors are focused on capital gains taxes and how proposals from both parties could affect their assets.  
    Democratic presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris last week proposed a 28% tax on long-term capital gains, or profits from the sale of assets owned for more than one year, for those making more than $1 million annually. The plan would raise the top rate from 20%.

    “I would go higher than that,” Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., on Sunday told NBC’s “Meet the Press” of Harris’ proposal. “I think she’s trying to be pragmatic and doing what she thinks is right in order to win the election.”
    More from Personal Finance:Here’s how the presidential election could affect your taxesWhat to know about court block on Biden’s new student loan forgiveness planAs the IRS targets the wealthy, here are audit red flags for everyday filers
    Harris’ plan veers from President Joe Biden’s 2025 fiscal year budget, which calls for 39.6% long-term capital gains taxes for those earning above $1 million per year.
    Her plan would also raise the net investment income tax, or NIIT, from 3.8% to 5%, The Wall Street Journal reported last week. Biden’s 2025 budget has the same NIIT increase for those with modified adjusted gross income, or MAGI, over $400,000.
    Under current law, the NIIT applies to certain investment earnings once MAGI exceeds $200,000 for single filers or $250,000 for married couples filing together.

    If Harris proposes raising the NIIT to 5%, the combined rate would be 33% for top earners. Biden’s plan would raise the combined rate to 44.6%.
    The Harris campaign did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

    Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump broadly supports tax cuts but hasn’t outlined a capital gains tax proposal.
    The issue was addressed in Project 2025, a “vision for a conservative administration” created by conservative think tank The Heritage Foundation with more than 100 other right-leaning organizations.
    Project 2025 called for a 15% tax rate for capital gains and dividends. The collection of proposals would also abolish the NIIT.
    Several Trump officials have been directly affiliated with Project 2025, but he has distanced himself from the plan.
    The Trump campaign did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.
    Of course, capital gains tax changes in either direction would require congressional approval, and control of the House and Senate is uncertain.
    Here’s how the candidates’ proposals compare with past capital gains tax rates.

    History of capital gains tax rates

    In recent decades, capital gains tax rates have generally been lower than “ordinary income” or regular income tax rates, according to the Tax Foundation.
    “We’ve applied preferential rates to qualified dividends and long-term capital gains, and that rate has trended downward over time,” said Garrett Watson, senior policy analyst and modeling manager at the Tax Foundation.  
    If enacted, Harris’ combined 33% capital gains rate for top earners would be the highest since 1978, when the rate was close to 40%, he said.
    Harris’ 28% top capital gains rate, excluding the NIIT, would mirror the top rate enacted by former President Ronald Reagan in 1986, which temporarily matched the ordinary income rate.
    After tax cuts from former President George W. Bush, the top capital gains tax rate dropped to 15% from 2003 through 2012. That rate was the lowest since the Great Depression, according to the Tax Policy Center.

    However, capital gains revenue is more volatile than regular income tax collections because it’s influenced by when investors sell or “realize” profits, Watson said.   
    “It creates a lot of uncertainty for policy wonks who are trying to generate revenue estimates for these proposals,” he added.  
    To that point, the average effective tax rates, or percentage of taxes paid, have been lower than the maximum capital gains rates, according to the Tax Foundation.

    Capital gains taxes can have a ‘lock-in effect’ 

    Generally, investors can choose when to sell assets and incur capital gains taxes. Higher rates or lower future rates can prompt investors to defer sales, experts say. Alternatively, investors will strategically realize gains in the 0% bracket, depending on their current taxable income and long-term goals.   
    For 2024, investors pay 0%, 15% or 20% capital gains taxes, plus 3.8% NIIT for higher earners.

    “There’s no question that there’s a lock-in effect associated with capital gains, and that will go up with a higher rate,” said Kent Smetters, a professor of business economics and public policy at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School.
    Although there have been proposals to tax unrealized gains, those plans have failed to reach broad support in Congress.  More