More stories

  • in

    Student loan payments go on pause for millions of borrowers

    The Biden administration will place about three million student loan borrowers enrolled in its new repayment plan in forbearance while it defends the program in court.
    Those who have signed up for The Saving on a Valuable Education, or SAVE plan, and have a monthly payment above $0 will not owe anything on their debt for the time being.
    The Department of Education will reach out to affected borrowers in the coming days.

    U.S. President Joe Biden is flanked by U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona as he speaks about administration plans to forgive federal student loan debt during remarks in the Roosevelt Room at the White House in Washington on Aug. 24, 2022.
    Leah Millis | Reuters

    The Biden administration is pausing student loan payments for about three million borrowers who are enrolled in its new repayment plan as it defends the program in court against Republican-backed lawsuits.
    Those who have signed up for The Saving on a Valuable Education, or SAVE plan, and have a monthly payment above $0 will not owe anything on their debt for the time being, the U.S. Department of Education told CNBC.

    More from Personal Finance:Why inflation is still upending retirement plansOlder voters want candidates who will protect Social SecurityWorkers in certain industries tend to have higher 401(k) balances
    Earlier this week, two federal judges in Kansas and Missouri temporarily halted significant parts of President Joe Biden’s SAVE plan.
    The preliminary injunctions are a result of lawsuits filed earlier this year by Republican-led states, including Florida, Arkansas and Missouri. The states argued that the Biden administration was overstepping its authority and trying to find a roundabout way to forgive student debt after the Supreme Court blocked its sweeping plan last year.
    Under the SAVE plan, many borrowers pay just 5% of their discretionary income toward their debt each month, and its guidelines state anyone making $32,800 or less has a $0 monthly payment. It also expedited the timeline after which many borrowers receive the full cancellation of their debt.

    The U.S. Department of Justice has filed a request to stay the injunction in Kansas.

    “Republican elected officials continue to fight to block their own constituents from saving money, having their monthly payments cut in half, and receiving relief,” an Education Department spokesperson said in a statement.
    They added that the Biden administration “will not stop vigorously defending the SAVE Plan, the most affordable repayment plan in history.”
    The Department of Education will reach out to affected borrowers in the coming days. Those borrowers will have their loans put into forbearance and will not accrue interest.
    The 4.5 million borrowers who have a $0 monthly payment under SAVE will continue to owe nothing and be considered up to date with their payments, the Department of Education said.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Biden, Trump accuse each other of ruining Social Security, Medicare in first presidential debate

    The leader who occupies the White House after November’s election may influence the fate of Social Security and Medicare.
    Here’s what President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump said about the programs during the first presidential debate on Thursday night.

    Republican presidential candidate former U.S. President Donald Trump and Democratic Party presidential candidate U.S. President Joe Biden speak during a presidential debate in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S., June 27, 2024 in a combination photo.
    Brian Snyder | Reuters

    The future of Social Security and Medicare may be greatly impacted by whoever occupies the White House following the November presidential election.
    When asked during Thursday night’s presidential debate who is the biggest risk to those programs, President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump pointed to each other.

    Biden said Trump wants to “get rid of” Social Security and cut Medicare.
    Trump said Biden is “destroying” those programs.
    Social Security provides monthly income to more than 72 million beneficiaries, including retired and disabled workers and families. Medicare provides health coverage to more than 65 million Americans age 65 and over.  
    With more than 11,000 Americans now turning 65 every day, according to estimates from the Retirement Income Institute at the Alliance for Lifetime Income, more retirees are relying on support from both programs.
    When voters age 50 and up were asked how important Social Security is to their vote this November, 80% said it is extremely important or very important, a recent AARP survey found.

    While those voters want a candidate who will protect the program, their support is still up for grabs, according to the results.
    Both Biden and Trump moved to win those voters on Thursday. Here’s what they said.

    Biden: ‘Make the wealthy begin to pay their fair share’

    When Biden was asked how he would keep Social Security solvent, he reiterated promises he made during the State of the Union to make the wealthy pay more toward the program.
    Social Security’s trust funds face a looming depletion date. The program’s trustees project Social Security’s combined funds may run out in 2035, at which point 83% of benefits will be payable unless Congress acts sooner.
    Social Security relies on payroll taxes. Currently, that includes 6.2% of a worker’s pay — which is matched by employers — on up to $168,600 in 2024 earnings.

    Biden is proposing that those payroll taxes are also applied to earnings over $400,000. Similar Democratic proposals also call for additional taxes on investment income.
    “I would not raise the cost of Social Security for anybody under $400,000,” Biden said on the debate stage on Thursday. “After that, I begin to make the wealthy begin to pay their fair share.”
    While the taxable maximum is adjusted each year, the percentage of total earnings above that threshold has increased over time. This year, that meant a top earner with $1 million in gross annual wage income stopped paying into Social Security in March.  
    Unlike Biden, Trump did not suggest specific changes to Social Security during the debate.

    Trump: Millions of immigrants get Social Security

    Trump said Biden is “destroying” Social Security by letting millions of people into the country, who he claimed are accessing not only that program but also Medicare and Medicaid.
    “Trump baselessly claimed that that undocumented workers are collecting benefits — a myth that has no basis in reality,” Max Richtman, president and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, said in a statement.
    “Undocumented workers are not eligible for Social Security benefits, period,” Richtman said. “Either Trump doesn’t understand how America’s greatest social insurance programs work — or he is purposely lying.”
    Immigration may instead help Social Security’s funding woes, experts say, by increasing the number of people who will work and pay payroll taxes into the program.
    That goes for illegal immigration as well, where workers tend to adopt false Social Security numbers and therefore still contribute to the program without working toward benefit eligibility, Social Security expert Laura Haltzel said in May.

    Trump: ‘I’m the one that got the insulin down’

    Members of the media work during the first presidential debate with US President Joe Biden and former US President Donald Trump in Atlanta, Georgia, US, on Thursday, June 27, 2024.
    Eva Marie Uzcategui | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Medicare now has a $35 cap on co-payments for insulin, and both Biden and Trump take credit for the change.
    While Biden incorrectly said during the debate that the price was lowered to $15 per shot, Trump said he was the one to actually lower those prices.
    “I took care of the seniors,” Trump said.
    It’s not the first time that Trump has suggested he lowered insulin costs. The former president also recently made the same claims on his social media platform, Truth Social.
    A recent analysis by health policy research organization KFF evaluated the efforts by both presidents to lower insulin costs.
    Trump established a voluntary, limited-time model from 2021 to 2023 where participating Medicare Part D prescription drug plans covered one dosage form and type of insulin product that was capped at $35 per month.

    Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act, which starting in 2023 made it so Medicare Part D plans can only charge up to $35 per month for covered insulin treatments, while cost sharing for insulin under Medicare Part B is also limited to $35 per month. Deductibles also no longer apply to insulin under either Medicare plan.
    Trump’s plan affected around 800,000 insulin users in 2022, according to KFF, while Biden’s plan may affect about 3.3 million insulin users covered by Medicare Part D, as well as Medicare Part B beneficiaries.
    “The Trump Administration’s $35 insulin copay model had a more limited reach than the insulin copay cap now in place under the Inflation Reduction Act that President Biden signed into law,” wrote KFF experts Juliette Cubanski, deputy director of the program on Medicare policy, and Tricia Neuman, executive director for the program on Medicare policy.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Marketplace health insurance may get more expensive — unless Congress extends this tax break

    If you buy health insurance via the federal marketplace, your premiums could increase significantly after 2025 — unless Congress takes action.  
    The premium tax credit lowers upfront marketplace health insurance premiums and the benefits were temporarily enhanced during the Covid-19 pandemic.
    “The expiration of the expansion is going to have an impact on just about everyone,” said Andrew Lautz, associate director for the Bipartisan Policy Center’s economic policy program.

    Nortonrsx | Istock | Getty Images

    If you buy health insurance via the federal marketplace, your premiums could increase significantly after 2025 — unless Congress takes action.
    The premium tax credit makes health insurance purchased via the marketplace more affordable. Participants can use the credit to lower insurance premiums upfront or claim the tax break when filing their return.

    The credit was temporarily enhanced via the American Rescue Plan Act during the Covid-19 pandemic. The legislation covered plans in 2021 and 2022, but the Inflation Reduction Act extended that benefit through 2025.
    If the benefits sunset after 2025, “virtually everybody would face higher premiums,” according to Gideon Lukens, senior fellow and director of research and data analysis for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, who wrote about the expirations this month.
    More from Personal Finance:Here’s why your July 4th barbecue may be pricier this yearTypical cost to sell a home in the U.S. is nearly $55,000: How to lower expenses55-year-olds are ‘critically underprepared’ for retirement, survey finds
    The White House in January reported record-high enrollment in marketplace plans for 2024, with more than 21 million participants.
    In his fiscal 2025 budget request, President Joe Biden proposed making the premium tax credit expansion permanent. He briefly plugged the program’s benefits for communities of color during the first presidential debate on Thursday.

    However, making the program permanent would increase the federal budget deficit by $335 billion from 2025 to 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office and Joint Committee on Taxation.
    Former President Donald Trump’s campaign did not respond to CNBC’s request for comment on the program.

    Tax break expiration will affect ‘just about everyone’

    Without an extension from Congress, marketplace premiums will increase for Americans across the income spectrum, with an effect in mid-2025 when health insurers begin releasing rates, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities report found.   
    For example, a typical family of four making $60,000 would see monthly premiums jump from $100 to $326, or about $2,700 more per year. By comparison, the same-size family earning $125,000 would see monthly premiums rise from $885 to $1,525, which adds about $7,700 annually.       
    “The expiration of the expansion is going to have an impact on just about everyone,” said Andrew Lautz, associate director for the Bipartisan Policy Center’s economic policy program.

    The expiration of the expansion is going to have an impact on just about everyone.

    Andrew Lautz
    Associate director for the Bipartisan Policy Center’s economic policy program

    The tax credit has reduced costs for all enrollees, even those ineligible for the tax break because “additional enrollment has improved the nongroup market risk pool,” according to the Urban Institute.
    Until 2021, the credit was only available for households with income between 100% and 400% of the federal poverty level. But the American Rescue Plan Act removed those limits and capped premiums at 8.5% of income.
    The premium tax credit is based on the difference between a benchmark premium — the cost of the second-lowest-cost silver plan available in an area — and a maximum contribution based on a percentage of income. The tax break is adjusted over time.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Inflation isn’t stopping people from dining out, but consumers are getting savvy with spending

    81% of Americans say they dine out at least once a month and 31% dine out at least once a week.
    Consumers say inflation is affecting their tipping habits.
    Free loyalty clubs and discounted gift cards can help stretch your dollar when dining out.

    A group of guys enjoy a dinner at Cassias outdoor patio as the much loved restaurant re-opens its indoor dining and continues outdoor dining on Wednesday, May 5, 2021 in Santa Monica, CA. 
    Jason Armond | Los Angeles Times | Getty Images

    Consumers aren’t sacrificing dining out, even with prices on the rise — but they are getting more savvy about managing those bills.
    The majority of Americans surveyed, 81%, say they are dining out once a month or more and 31% say they dine out once a week or more, according to new research from e-commerce provider Lightspeed Commerce Inc.

    Even though inflation has slowed significantly from its pandemic-era peak, consumers still feeling the financial squeeze are opting for takeout, value meals and happy hour deals, the report found.
    The consumer price index, which gauges how fast prices are changing in the U.S. economy, shows food prices at restaurants have been growing faster than grocery store items — but finance experts have tips for stretching your dollar.

    “While Americans are still dining out, they are also looking for ways to keep dining fun and affordable amidst changing economic conditions. It’s all about value for diners — they’re looking to enjoy eating out, but at a good price,” Lightspeed CEO Dax Dasilva said.
    Lightspeed surveyed 1,500 Americans in May as part of an international survey that included 7,500 overall responses.

    Higher meal prices and ‘shrinkflation’

    U.S. diners are noticing rising prices when the server drops off their bill, with 69% in the Lightspeed survey reporting pricier meals. Some said they’re seeing “shrinkflation” in action, with 39% noticing their favorite dishes shrinking in size even as the prices remain the same or increase.

    Even with a jump in prices, about half of respondents said they will continue to dine out at the same rate or increase their frequency of restaurant visits. 
    Ted Jenkin, a certified financial planner and CEO of oXYGen Financial Inc. in Atlanta, said consumer dining trends could be a lingering effect from the aftermath of the pandemic. 
    More from Personal Finance:Here’s why your July 4th barbecue may be pricier this yearBiden’s new student loan relief plan is on pause. What to knowHomeowners typically spend nearly $55,000 to sell a home
    “It started with revenge travel, and then it was followed by revenge shopping. And now I think it’s just a way that people are living their life with this mentality of ‘I’m going to just enjoy my life today, because I don’t know what tomorrow is going to bring me,'” said Jenkin, who is a member of the CNBC Advisor Council. “And I think there’s been some permanency to that.”
    Nearly half of U.S. diners, 45%, are being more frugal by asking for to-go boxes to enjoy leftovers later, according to Lightspeed. Meanwhile, 43% are hunting for deals with coupons, 39% are choosing value meals and 36% are taking advantage of happy hour specials.

    Past the ‘tipping point of tipping’

    One way consumers say inflation is impacting their dining habits is through tipping. Of those surveyed, 44% of consumers said inflation has affected their ability to tip.
    The majority of diners surveyed, 73%, say they’re not happy when the cashier flips around a tablet screen to reveal auto-tipping options. 
    “I think when times were better, you definitely saw more people being more comfortable at the iPad paying tip,” said Winnie Sun, co-founder and managing director of Irvine, California-based Sun Group Wealth Partners. She is also a member of the CNBC Advisor Council.
    “Nowadays, consumers are fed up with having to tip at places that they don’t normally tip at,” she added.

    When looking at scenarios outside of sit-down restaurants, consumers are more likely to tip delivery drivers (61%), than baristas at coffee shops (28%) or an employee working behind a counter (19%).
    “People have passed the tipping point of tipping. I think people are willing to tip when they go out to a real service-based restaurant,” Jenkin said. “The days of going in and having to pay for a $7 coffee and leaving a $2 tip are, I think, are getting smaller and smaller as consumers are feeling the bite at their wallet.”

    Ways to spend wisely while dining out

    Beyond taking advantage of deals a restaurant offers, Jenkin and Sun shared tips for cutting costs when dining out:

    Join free loyalty clubs restaurants offer to get free perks.
    Dine out on Monday or Tuesday when restaurants tend to be slower and may offer more deals.
    Opt for two appetizers and one entree, instead of one appetizer and two entrees. This can cut $20 to $30 off your bill Jenkin said, and the entree is typically big enough to split.
    Look for discounted restaurant gift cards on secondary market sites such as CardCash, Raise or eBay.
    When ordering on sites like DoorDash or UberEats, choose pickup instead of delivery to cut fees. 
    Research menus and plan ahead to know which dishes are in your budget.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Here’s why your July 4th barbecue may be pricier this year

    A traditional Independence Day barbecue for 10 people will cost $71.22 this year, on average, up 5% from 2023 and 30% from 2019, according to an American Farm Bureau Federation estimate.
    Beef and lemonade prices have risen significantly. Those for chicken breast and potato salad are down.
    Overall grocery inflation has fallen to a roughly pre-pandemic level.

    Miodrag Ignjatovic | E+ | Getty Images

    Americans firing up their grills for Fourth of July celebrations will likely pay more for some traditional barbecue staples this year.
    That’s largely due to inflationary pressures in the U.S. economy and supply shocks related to specific foods such as beef and lemons, according to agricultural economists.

    The average cookout for 10 people will cost $71.22 this year, up 5% from 2023 and up about 30% from five years ago, according to an American Farm Bureau Federation estimate.
    The group analyzed prices for ground beef, chicken breast, pork chops, cheese, hamburger buns, homemade potato salad, potato chips, chocolate chip cookies, ice cream, strawberries, pork and beans, and lemonade:

    2 pounds of ground beef, $12.77 (+11% vs. 2023)
    2 pounds of chicken breasts, $7.83 (-4%)
    3 pounds of pork chops, $15.49 (+8%)
    1 pound of cheese, $3.57 (+1%)
    1 package of hamburger buns, $2.41 (+7%)
    2½ pounds of homemade potato salad, $3.32 (-4%)
    32 ounces of pork and beans, $2.49 (+2%)
    16 ounces of potato chips, $4.90 (+8%)
    13-ounce package of chocolate chip cookies, $3.99 (+2%)
    ½ gallon of ice cream, $5.65 (+7%)
    2 pints of strawberries, $4.61 (+1%)
    2½ quarts of lemonade, $4.19 (+12%)

    Overall food inflation has fallen dramatically, though.
    Grocery prices are rising at a rate of 1% a year — roughly their pre-pandemic pace — after having topped out at 13.5% in August 2022.
    The worst of food inflation is “in the rearview mirror,” Wells Fargo agricultural economists wrote in a recent analysis of Fourth of July food prices.

    While food generally won’t be cheaper at the grocery store, “you’re not seeing these huge jumps in prices you saw in the last year or two,” Courtney Schmidt, a sector manager at Wells Fargo’s Agri-Food Institute and report co-author, told CNBC.
    That said, consumers have seen prices fall for some specific barbecue items such as chicken breast and potatoes, the Farm Bureau said.

    Why beef and lemon prices are rising

    An employee examines a side of beef inside a freezer at a butcher shop in Louisville, Kentucky, in August 2022. 
    Luke Sharrett/Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Ground beef and lemonade are the items for which Americans will see the biggest price increases for an Independence Day barbecue, according to Bernt Nelson, a Farm Bureau economist.
    Two pounds of ground beef cost $12.77, on average, up 11% from 2023, according to the group’s analysis.
    That’s largely due to low beef supply. The overall cattle inventory is the smallest it’s been in 73 years, and the amount of red meat in cold storage is at its lowest in more than two decades, according to the Farm Bureau.
    “We had a really severe drought in 2022 that caused that reduction in supply,” Schmidt said. “It’s a long life cycle for cattle, so it takes time to rebuild that herd.”
    More from Personal Finance:Homeowners typically spend $55,000 to sell a homeWhere U.S. rents are rising — and falling — the fastestAmericans are spending a lot on travel and entertainment
    The average person would pay $2.16 for ingredients to prepare one quarter-pound hamburger with cheese, tomato and lettuce at home, according to a Wells Fargo analysis.
    Meanwhile, 2½ quarts of lemonade cost an average $4.19, up 12%.
    A citrus greening disease outbreak in California, the U.S.’ largest lemon producer, in late 2023 has pushed down supply, the Farm Bureau said. The U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates lemon production will fall 16% in 2024.
    Average lemon prices are up 13% from last year, while sugar prices rose 11% due partly to lower global production, the Farm Bureau said.
    “Overall inflation has also contributed to the increased prices for foods like chips, burger buns and many others,” Nelson said.

    Why chicken and potato prices are down

    Adene Sanchez | E+ | Getty Images

    A two-pound pack of chicken breast will cost $7.83, on average, down 4% from 2023 and 13% from a record high in 2022, per the Farm Bureau analysis. Chicken supplies have rebounded, according to USDA data, following a historic and deadly outbreak of bird flu in 2022.
    Meat — including ground beef, pork chops and chicken breast — accounts for 50% of the total cost of an Independence Day barbecue, according to the Farm Bureau.
    Potato salad will also be cheaper than in 2023, largely because of lower prices for its key ingredient. Two pounds of potatoes cost $1.53, down 17%, the Farm Bureau said. Crop production is recovering from weather-related shortfalls that had pushed prices to recent record highs, it said.

    How to save money

    Prices for dining out have increased more than groceries in the past year: Up 4% versus 1%, respectively, according to the consumer price index.
    The average price of a quarter-pound burger at quick-service restaurants is $6.95, triple the cost of preparing one burger at home, Wells Fargo found. For a party of 10, party hosts would save $47.90 by cooking at home instead of buying a burger, it said.
    “This is going to be another great year to break out your grill and cook the burger yourself at home,” Schmidt said.

    That said, for those who require the convenience of dining out, many quick-service joints are offering value options for diners, she added.
    Higher costs for aluminum have fed through to prices for 12-ounce drink cans, Schmidt said. She recommended considering a two-liter shareable bottle instead of individual aluminum cans. The price for a 12 oz. can of soda is up 4.8% over the past year, while that for two-liter bottles is down 6.5%, for example.
    Consumers looking to save should also do a little online research, she said. Grocery stores often run Fourth of July deals; consumers can look up weekly ads and shop around for cost savings. More

  • in

    Selling a home is expensive, too: Homeowners typically spend nearly $55,000, report finds

    The typical cost to sell a house in 2024 is $54,616, according to a new report by Clever Real Estate.
    “When people think about selling their home, they’re thinking about how much money they’re going to make from their home sale, and not how much they’re going to spend,” said Jaime Dunaway-Seale, data writer at Clever Real Estate.

    Vm | E+ | Getty Images

    Buying a home and maintaining it is expensive, but selling it is costly, too, according to a new report.
    It typically costs $54,616 to sell a house in 2024, according to a June 17 report from Clever Real Estate. Almost half of surveyed home sellers, or 42%, said their costs to sell were higher than expected, the report found.

    “When people think about selling their home, they’re thinking about how much money they’re going to make from their home sale, and not how much they’re going to spend,” said Jaime Dunaway-Seale, data writer at Clever Real Estate.
    “That cost does end up being very high and then they’re caught off guard and disappointed because that’s going to take a cut out of their profit,” Dunaway-Seale said.
    In May, Clever Real Estate polled 1,014 Americans who sold a home between 2022 and 2024 about their attitudes related to the home-selling process. It also conducted an analysis of seller costs based on median real estate prices in May.
    More from Personal Finance:Americans struggle to shake off a ‘vibecession’Why inflation is still upending retirement plansThese are the least difficult areas to buy a home
    About 39% of the total cost — $21,603 — is spent on real estate agent commissions, according to the report.

    However, as a landmark case involving real estate agent commission fees will soon take effect, sellers will no longer be required to pick up the entire tab. If a seller decides not to pay the buyer’s real estate agent’s commission, it could “drop their cost by about $10,000,” Dunaway-Seale said.
    Other typical expenses include doing some home repairs both ahead of the listing and in response to inspections, which Clever Real Estate estimates to cost $10,000; closing costs ($8,000); buyer concessions, or expenses the seller agrees to pay for the buyer to reduce upfront purchase costs, ($7,200); moving costs ($3,250); marketing and advertising costs ($2,300); and staging costs ($2,263).
    But home sellers should focus on “maximizing the efficiency of the transaction,” and “not just trying to save on costs,” said Mark Hamrick, senior analyst at Bankrate. 
    “Ultimately, [with] many of these fees, there’s no harm in trying to negotiate, and that includes real estate commissions,” Hamrick said.

    ‘There are plenty of costs involved’

    Cost-constrained homebuyers in today’s housing market do not want to inherit homes in need of renovations, according to the Clever Real Estate report.
    “There are plenty of costs involved,” said certified financial planner Kashif A. Ahmed, founder and president of American Private Wealth in Bedford, Massachusetts. “You might have to do some renovations to sell it.” 
    If a buyer makes it as far as the home inspection process and sees issues in the house that were not noticeable during the initial walkthrough nor disclosed, they may have room to ask the seller to do the necessary repairs, Daryl Fairweather, chief economist at Redfin, recently told CNBC.

    That is especially true in housing markets where listed homes are lingering on the market for longer because it gives homebuyers “bargaining power,” according to Orphe Divounguy, a senior economist at Zillow.
    Sellers often incur pre- and post-listing repairs, improvements and renovations that can cost around $10,000, according to Clever Real Estate. 
    “There may be a situation where a buyer might say, ‘Well, I want you to fix this before I buy it,’ and then you’re like, ‘Well, in the interest of getting rid of this place … I’ll spend the extra money,'” Ahmed said. 
    But the highest expenses an owner will face when selling a home are the real estate agent commission fees, Ahmed said.

    ‘The rule change has not yet gone into effect’

    A landmark case is poised to change the way homes are bought and sold in the U.S.
    The National Association of Realtors in March agreed to a $418 million settlement in an antitrust lawsuit in which a federal jury found the organization and other real estate brokerages had conspired to artificially inflate agent commissions on the sale and purchase of real estate.
    “We went ahead and included it [in the Clever Real Estate analysis] now because, as of right now, the rule change has not yet gone into effect,” said Dunaway-Seale.
    A finalized NAR settlement takes effect in August, and there is a “much more defined notion that sellers are not responsible” for a buyer’s real estate agent commissions, said real estate attorney Claudia Cobreiro, the founder of Cobreiro Law in Coral Gables, Florida.

    Commission rates have also been removed from the multiple listing system, or MLS, in some areas like Miami, she noted.
    The new mandatory MLS policy changes will take effect on August 17, 2024, according to the NAR.
    However, “that is the policy side of it,” she said. “The practical side of it is that we are still seeing the notion that Realtors are needed,” and most buyers might not have an extra $10,000 on top of closing costs and the down payment required for the purchase, Cobreiro said.
    Dunaway-Seale agreed: “Sellers might not be obligated to pay the buyer’s agent commission, but a lot of them still might as just another incentive to bring buyers in.” 

    Ways to reduce costs

    A seller has to pay closing costs; everything else depends on the home seller’s priority, or how quickly they need to sell off the property, said Dunaway-Seale.
    Here are some ways to cut or reduce expenses associated with selling a house:
    1. Sell without a real estate agent: Homeowners could try to sell the house themselves and potentially drop real estate services altogether, said Dunaway-Seale.
    “But they’re not going to sell for as much profit,” she said.
    Among sellers who did not hire an agent, 59% did so to save money, Clever Real Estate found. But sellers who did work with an agent sold their house for about $34,000 more than those who did not, according to the report.

    Keep in mind that going through the transaction without a real estate agent can pose a risk.
    Signing the contract is the least of it. There are so many things that happen throughout the transaction that really require the expertise and the navigation by someone who understands the process, Cobreiro previously told CNBC.
    “You’re talking about one of the most expensive and consequential transactions of a lifetime,” said Hamrick. “These fees can on the face of it look a bit daunting, but the good news is most people are not going into this where they’re going to essentially lose money on the transaction.”
    2. Reduce concessions, staging and marketing costs: “If sellers don’t really care about selling their home quickly, they could possibly offer fewer concessions,” Dunaway-Seale said. Concessions are expenses the seller agrees to pay for to reduce a buyer’s upfront costs.
    Lowering the budget for staging and marketing costs can also save on expenses because such tools help draw buyers in, she said.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Trump and Biden’s first presidential debate: Here’s what to expect on taxes

    President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump will face off Thursday in the first presidential debate of the 2024 general election.
    The biggest tax issue is expiring provisions from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or TCJA, of 2017 and how to pay for extensions.
    More than 60% of tax filers could face increased taxes in 2026 if TCJA provisions sunset, according to the Tax Foundation.   

    Joe Biden and Donald Trump 2024
    Brendan Smialowski | Jon Cherry | Getty Images

    President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump will face off Thursday in the first presidential debate of the 2024 general election — and the presumptive nominees could show voters where they stand on tax policy, experts say.
    One key issue is the Republicans’ expiring tax breaks enacted via the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or TCJA. Without action from Congress, several provisions will sunset after 2025, including lower federal income tax brackets, a boosted child tax credit and higher estate and gift tax exemptions, among others.

    More than 60% of tax filers could face increased taxes in 2026 if TCJA provisions expire, according to the Tax Foundation.   
    Andrew Lautz, associate director for the Bipartisan Policy Center’s economic policy program, said he’s looking for Biden and Trump to “move beyond some of the political rhetoric” to discuss how they plan to address next year’s TCJA expirations.
    More from Personal Finance:Pandemic-era small business tax credit claim backlog is ‘harming taxpayers,’ IRS watchdog saysThe ‘funflation’ effect: Here’s why consumers are spending so much this summer55-year-olds are ‘critically underprepared’ for retirement, survey finds
    Although both campaigns want to renew TCJA provisions for most Americans, questions remain about the cost of those extensions, particularly amid the federal budget deficit.
    Fully extending TCJA provisions could add an estimated $4.6 trillion to the deficit over the next decade, the Congressional Budget Office reported in May.

    Trump is a ‘wild card’ on tax policy 

    After yearly budget proposals to Congress, there will be “very few surprises from the Biden tax agenda,” said Steve Rosenthal, senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.
    “He repeats it every year, and he’s promised to pursue that which has not been enacted, which is most of it,” Rosenthal said.
    Biden wants higher taxes on the ultra-wealthy and corporations to fund TCJA extensions for those making less than $400,000 only.

    In his fiscal year 2025 budget, Biden called for increasing the top individual income tax rate on earnings above $400,000, bumping capital gains to regular income tax rates for households making more than $1 million and a 25% minimum tax on wealth exceeding $100 million.
    However, the future of these proposals is unclear with control of Congress uncertain.
    “Trump is the wild card,” Rosenthal said. “It’s hard to say how serious he is about some of these ideas he just throws out there.”
    So far, Trump has said he aims to fully extend expiring TCJA provisions and has voiced support for tariffs, which are taxes levied on imported goods. Trump has also floated eliminating taxes on workers’ tips and an “all tariff policy” to get rid of the income tax.

    The ‘economic reality’ of tariffs

    The debate could also address Trump’s and Biden’s policies on tariffs, which both candidates have supported to varying degrees, according to Erica York, senior economist and research director at the Tax Foundation’s Center for Federal Tax Policy.

    “We know the economic reality,” she said. “[Tariffs] cost American businesses. They create a disadvantage for our firms trying to compete across the globe because they increase input costs here.”
    During his term, Trump added tariffs on China, Mexico, the European Union and others. Many of the tariffs on China have remained in place under the Biden administration. More

  • in

    Here’s where U.S. rents are rising — and falling — the fastest

    Asking rents for one- and two-bedroom apartments are up more than 10% in some large U.S. cities since June 2023, according to Zumper.
    They include Syracuse, New York; Lincoln, Nebraska; Chicago; Buffalo, New York; Madison, Wisconsin; Rochester, New York; and New York City.
    Meanwhile, prices fell by at least 5% in other major cities.
    Rent inflation is guided by apartment supply and renter demand.

    Tourists walk through a park in Chicago, on May 26, 2024.  
    Jamie Kelter Davis/Bloomberg via Getty Images

    Many major U.S. cities have seen apartment prices soar in the past year, even as the typical American has seen pandemic-era rent inflation cool substantially.
    For example, renters in Syracuse, New York, saw monthly rents for one- and two-bedroom apartments on the market jump the most relative to other big cities: by 29% and 25%, respectively, since June 2023, according to data in Zumper’s National Rent Report.

    Zumper analyzed median asking rents for apartment listings in the largest 100 U.S. cities by population.
    Rents have also risen by at least 10% for both one- and two-bedroom apartments in other major metros: Lincoln, Nebraska; Chicago; Buffalo, New York; Madison, Wisconsin; Rochester, New York; and New York City, according to Zumper.

    Conversely, renters in other cities are seeing relief.
    Asking rents for one-bedroom apartments have declined by at least 5% in Oakland, California; Memphis and Chattanooga, Tennessee; Cincinnati, Ohio; Colorado Springs, Colorado; Irving, Texas; Jacksonville, Florida; and Raleigh, Greensboro and Durham, North Carolina, according to the analysis.

    By comparison, national prices overall for one- and two-bedroom apartments are up 1.5% and 2.1%, respectively, since June 2023, Zumper found.

    New York is the most expensive metro for renters: The typical renter pays $4,300 a month for a one-bedroom apartment, it found.
    By comparison, in Akron, Ohio, and Wichita, Kansas — which tied for the lowest big-city rents — renters pay $730 a month for a one-bedroom apartment.

    What causes rent inflation

    At a high level, rent inflation is guided by supply-and-demand dynamics, said Crystal Chen, an analyst who authored the Zumper analysis.
    Basically, areas with fast-growing rents are seeing demand outstrip the supply of available apartments, while those with falling rents have seen their apartment inventories growing.
    For example, the apartment vacancy rate in New York City recently dropped to 1.4%, a historic low dating to the 1960s, according to the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development. The vacancy rate “nosedived” from 4.5% just two years ago, the agency said.
    More from Personal Finance:The typical new home in the U.S. is shrinkingWhy inflation is still upending retirement plansThese are the least difficult areas in U.S. to buy a home
    “The data is clear, the demand to live in our city is far outpacing our ability to build housing,” New York City Mayor Eric Adams said in a statement about the vacancy rate.
    Swelling rents can present financial challenges for households.
    In May, a typical renter would have spent almost 30% of their income on a new rental, according to Zillow.
    While down from a recent peak near 31% in June 2022, it exceeds the roughly 28% that was common before the pandemic, according to Zillow data.

    About 86% of New York City residents with the lowest income (less than $25,000 a year) are severely rent burdened, according to the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development. An increase in financial strain has caused “an alarming increase in missed rent payments and arrears” relative to 2021, it said.
    High rents can have other cascading impacts.
    For example, they may limit the ability of prospective homebuyers to save for a down payment, “keeping them on the sidelines of the housing market,” Fitch said in a global housing outlook.

    Rent inflation has fallen substantially

    Rent inflation plummeted in the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic.
    “Pretty much everyone” sheltered in place during the health crisis, and digital nomads who no longer had to work in a physical office left cities in favor of the suburbs and outdoor spaces, Chen said.

    However, rents spiked through 2022 and into 2023 amid return-to-office policies and as people moved back to bigger cities, Chen said.
    Annual rent inflation largely hovered between 3% and 4% the the years leading up to the pandemic, and peaked around 9% in early 2023, according to the consumer price index. It has gradually cooled since then, to about 5% in May, according to consumer price index data. More