More stories

  • in

    Nearing retirement? These strategies can protect your savings from tariff volatility

    The latest tariff-induced stock market volatility may be unsettling for investors who are approaching retirement.
    Some 4.18 million Americans in 2025 are expected to reach age 65, more than any previous year, according to the Alliance for Lifetime Income.
    But there are investing strategies to protect your portfolio, experts say.

    Alistair Berg | Digitalvision | Getty Images

    After the latest stock market volatility, many Americans are feeling stressed about the future of the U.S. economy and their finances.  
    That uncertainty can be even more unsettling for near-retirees who are preparing to leave the workforce and tap portfolios for living expenses, experts say.

    To that point, your first five years of retirement are the “danger zone” for tapping accounts during a downturn, according to Amy Arnott, a portfolio strategist with Morningstar Research Services.
    If you take assets from accounts when the value is falling, “there’s less money left in the portfolio to benefit from an eventual rebound in the market,” she said. 
    Some 4.18 million Americans in 2025 are projected to reach age 65, more than any previous year, according to a January report from the Alliance for Lifetime Income.  
    More from Personal Finance:Majority of Americans are financially stressed from tariff turmoilThis tax strategy is a ‘silver lining’ amid tariff volatility, advisor saysCash may feel safe when stocks slide, but it has risks

    Loading chart…

    ‘Protect your nest egg’

    After several years of stock market growth, it’s important to “protect your nest egg” by rebalancing based on your risk tolerance and timeline, said CFP Jon Ulin, managing principal of Ulin & Co. Wealth Management in Boca Raton, Florida.
    If you’re in your early 60s, you may shift assets closer to a 60/40 investment portfolio, which typically has 60% stocks and 40% bonds, he said.
    However, that could include additional diversification, depending on your risk appetite and goals, experts say.
    Alternatively, if you’re struggling with the latest market drawdowns, you may prefer a more conservative allocation, Baker said.
    “This is a good time for a temperature check” to make sure your portfolio still matches your risk tolerance, he added.

    Build your cash reserves

    Typically, it’s best to avoid selling investments when the stock market is down, especially during the first few years of retirement, experts say.
    The phenomenon, known as “sequence of returns risk,” shrinks your nest egg early, which hurts long-term portfolio growth when the market rebounds, research shows.
    CFP Malcolm Ethridge, founder of Capital Area Planning Group in Washington, D.C., suggests keeping two years of income in cash within a couple of years of your planned retirement date.   
    The strategy protects from early losses because retirees can tap cash reserves for living expenses while their portfolio recovers, he said.
    There’s also a “psychological aspect” because the cash provides confidence to spend portfolio assets, which “sets the stage for the rest of retirement,” Ethridge said.

    Consider a ‘bond ladder’

    Amid bond market volatility, older investors may also consider building a bond ladder to provide portfolio income, said Alex Caswell, a San Francisco-based CFP at Wealth Script Advisors. 
    This investment strategy involves purchasing a range of shorter-term Treasuries with staggered maturity dates, providing a steady income stream while managing interest rate risk, Caswell said.
    For example, you may invest in Treasuries that mature every six months or one year for up to five years. Some investors also use the ladder method with certificates of deposit, he said.   
    The maturing bonds or CDs offer “an extra layer of emotional comfort and stability for clients, especially those just entering retirement,” he said.    More

  • in

    Top Wall Street analysts like these dividend-paying energy stocks

    Pavlo Gonchar | SOPA Images | Lightrocket | Getty Images

    Fears of a potential recession and anxiety over tariff policy are weighing on the markets, but dividend stocks can help steady investors’ portfolios.
    Top Wall Street analysts help identify companies that can withstand short-term challenges and generate solid cash flows, allowing them to consistently pay solid dividends.

    Here are three dividend-paying stocks, highlighted by Wall Street’s top pros on TipRanks, a platform that ranks analysts based on their past performance.

    Energy Transfer

    Midstream energy company Energy Transfer (ET) is this week’s first dividend pick. The company has a diversified portfolio of energy assets in the U.S., with more than 130,000 miles of pipeline and related energy infrastructure.
    In February, ET paid a quarterly cash distribution of $0.3250 per common unit, reflecting a 3.2% year-over-year increase. The stock offers a dividend yield of 7.5%.
    Energy Transfer is scheduled to announce its first-quarter results on May 6. In her Q1 preview on the U.S. midstream sector, RBC Capital analyst Elvira Scotto named Energy Transfer as one of the companies she favors in this space. The analyst contends that the recent pullback in the stocks in RBC’s midstream coverage universe seems “overdone given the highly contracted and fee-based nature of midstream businesses.”
    Scotto thinks that ET’s commentary about benefits from Waha price spreads (the price difference between natural gas traded at the Waha Hub in the Permian Basin and the benchmark Henry Hub price) could be one of the key drivers. She also expects ET stock to gain from any updates on potential data center/artificial intelligence-driven projects. The analyst added that management’s comments about export markets, mainly China, due to the trade war, will also impact investor sentiment.

    The analyst is bullish on Energy Transfer due to its diversified cash flow streams across hydrocarbons and basins, including a significant amount of fee-based cash flow. Scotto expects ET’s cash flow growth, coupled with a solid balance sheet, to boost the cash returns to unit holders. She thinks that ET stock has an attractive valuation with limited downside. Overall, Scotto reaffirmed a buy rating on ET stock but slightly lowered the price target to $22 from $23 due to market uncertainty.
    Scotto ranks No. 24 among more than 9,400 analysts tracked by TipRanks. Her ratings have been successful 67% of the time, delivering an average return of 18.1%. See Energy Transfer Ownership Structure on TipRanks.

    The Williams Companies

    Another midstream energy player that Scotto is bullish on is The Williams Companies (WMB). The company is set to announce its results for the first quarter of 2025 on May 5. Recently, WMB raised its dividend by 5.3% to $2.00 on an annualized basis for 2025. WMB offers a dividend yield of 3.4%.
    Ahead of the Q1 results, Scotto listed several potential key drivers for WMB stock, including long-term AI/data center growth opportunities, dry gas basin activity, marketing segment results and the timing of growth projects coming online.
    “We think investors favor WMB’s natural gas focused operations currently as the impact to natural gas demand is lower vs crude oil in a downturn given the underlying demand support from increasing LNG exports and AI/datacenters,” said Scotto.
    Scotto reaffirmed a buy rating on WMB stock with a price target of $63. The analyst expects continued strong volumes across Williams’ segments, though some volume headwinds may persist in the Northeast segment. Scotto expects a solid quarter for WMB’s Sequent business due to weather-led storage opportunities.
    Overall, Scotto is optimistic about WMB executing on its backlog of growth projects and bolstering its balance sheet. With a long-term horizon, the analyst expects Williams to remain comfortably within investment-grade credit metrics through her forecast period and keep its dividend intact. See Williams Technical Analysis on TipRanks.

    Diamondback Energy

    Diamondback Energy (FANG) is focused on the onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin. In February, the company announced an 11% hike in its annual base dividend to $4 per share. FANG offers a dividend yield of 4.5%.
    Ahead of the company’s first-quarter results scheduled to be announced in early May, JPMorgan analyst Arun Jayaram reiterated a buy rating on FANG stock and slightly reduced the price target to $166 from $167. The analyst expects the company’s Q1 2025 results to be relatively in line with the Street’s estimates. Jayaram expects FANG to report Q1 cash flow per share (CFPS) of $8.12 compared to the Street’s estimates of $8.09.
    Despite the volatility in commodity prices, Jayaram doesn’t expect any changes to FANG’s maintenance capital plan, at least in the near term, with operations continuing to be on track following the Double Eagle acquisition. The analyst also noted solid well productivity trends from Diamondback’s projects that turned-in-line in 2024, which should provide additional capital efficiency tailwinds.
    Jayaram expects FANG to generate free cash flow (FCF) of about $1.4 billion, with cash returns comprising 90 cents per share in quarterly dividends and $437 million of share buybacks.
    “FANG is a leader in capital efficiency among the E&Ps [exploration and production companies] and has one of the lowest FCF break-evens across the group,” the analyst said.
    Jayaram ranks No. 943 among more than 9,400 analysts tracked by TipRanks. His ratings have been successful 49% of the time, delivering an average return of 6.2%. See Diamondback Energy Insider Trading on TipRanks. More

  • in

    Experts see higher stagflation risks. Here’s what it means for your money

    Americans may not be done grappling with high prices, with economic forecasts predicting higher inflation as Trump tariff policies go into effect.
    Combined with slower economic growth and high unemployment, that could result in an economic condition known as stagflation, which the U.S. struggled with in the 1970s.
    Here’s what experts say that means for your money.

    David Espejo | Moment | Getty Images

    Weary consumers, already grappling with high prices, now face an added potential risk: stagflation.
    Stagflation — an economic term used to describe a combination of rising inflation, slower economic growth and high unemployment — may be on the horizon, according to economists.

    “The Trump White House tariff policy has certainly increased the risk of both higher inflation and lower growth,” said Brett House, professor of professional practice in economics at Columbia Business School.
    The Trump administration’s tariff policies are fueling stagflation conditions, according to the latest CNBC Rapid Update, which averages forecasts from 14 economists.
    “It’s a more pronounced risk than at any time over the past 40 years,” said Greg Daco, chief economist at EY Parthenon and vice president at the National Association for Business Economics.
    Uncertainty is already showing up in consumer confidence, said Diane Swonk, chief economist at KPMG.
    “We’re seeing that kind of whiff of stagflation, where people are less secure about their jobs and they’re more worried about inflation down the road,” Swonk said.

    What would stagflation mean in today’s economy?

    Unidentified people line up with cans to buy gas at a Mobil gas station in Suffolk County, New York, in July 1979. In 1977 oil prices went up to more than $20 a barrel in response to increased demand and OPEC’s policy of limiting supply, which caused long lines at gas stations, and for the first time in history gasoline prices exceeded $1 a gallon.
    Jim Pozarik | Hulton Archive | Getty Images

    Stagflation was a major issue for the U.S. economy in the 1970s, when unemployment rates and inflation both rose as the country grappled with the costly Vietnam War and the loss of manufacturing jobs.
    The 1970s-era stagflation is often associated with major oil price increases, leading to shortages and long lines at gas stations. However, some economists have argued it was actually monetary fluctuations that prompted stagflation.
    The conditions prompted then Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker to implement a dramatic tightening of monetary policy in the late ’70s and ’80s known as the “Volcker shock.” While inflation did come down as the Fed pushed interest rates higher, the central bank’s moves also prompted a severe recession — often defined as two consecutive quarters of negative gross domestic product growth — and higher than 10% unemployment.

    Stagflation would not happen in the same way today, according to Dan Skelly, head of Morgan Stanley Wealth Management market research.
    The U.S. is no longer at the whim of foreign oil, Skelly said. Moreover, unions, which prompted wage price spirals back then, are no longer as big a portion of the private work force today, he said.
    The uncertainty around tariffs may affect corporate and consumer confidence, which would prompt spending and investment to slow, Skelly said. The likelihood of the growth slowdown part of stagflation is fairly high, he said.
    However, Skelly said Morgan Stanley expects to see more effects in the stock market through earnings than in the economy.
    Many firms are revising their economic forecasts, including the possibility of a recession, as a result of Trump administration policies, according to a new survey by Chief Executive.
    Stagflation is not necessarily accompanied by a formal recession; rather, it can be slowing or stagnant growth, House said.
    KPMG’s current forecast expects a shallow recession, with inflation peaking at the end of the third quarter.
    “It’s not even what we saw during the pandemic,” Swonk said of the inflation spike. But it would be enough for employment to slow and to prompt a mild bout of stagflation, she said.
    Stagflation, if it happens, would be the “worst of both worlds,” with higher unemployment and costs, Daco said.
    “That represents a significant hardship for many families and businesses across the country,” he said.

    How can you prepare for stagflation?

    Athvisions | E+ | Getty Images

    Americans may be facing a challenging economic period, with slower income growth, reduced employment prospects, higher unemployment and higher prices making it more difficult to stretch household budgets, according to House.
    To prepare for stagflation, consumers would need to take all the steps they would in a recession as well as the steps they would take when prices are rising, said Sarah Foster, economic analyst at Bankrate.
    As tariffs are expected to drive prices up, consumers may be tempted to buy ahead, even big-ticket items such as cars, laptops, smartphones or even homes.
    Before making any such purchases, it’s important to make sure it’s in your budget, Foster said.
    “It is absolutely wise right now to buy something that you know could be impacted by tariffs that you’ve already been budgeting for,” Foster said.
    Yet consumers should be careful when it comes to “panic buying,” she said, or spending money to save money.
    More from Personal Finance:Tariffs, trade war inflation may be ‘pretty ugly’ by summerWhat advisors are telling clients after bond sell-offHow a trade war could impact the price of clothing
    Instead of overstretching their budgets with purchases, consumers should prioritize paying down high-interest credit card debt and building up an emergency fund. Focusing on high-interest debt first can save money in the long run, and having an emergency fund provides a financial safety net.
    Experts generally recommend having at least six months’ expenses set aside. While it can be difficult to sock away extra money amid higher prices, the good news is higher interest rates are still providing inflation-beating returns on cash through online high-yield savings accounts that are FDIC-insured, Foster said.
    For those who have been keeping cash on the sidelines rather than investing, now is the time to start allocating toward equities and riskier assets, considering the recent market drop, Skelly said.
    “Don’t do it all in one day, but start winding down some of that cash, now that values are more fair than they were a month or two ago,” Skelly said.
    Investors who have reaped big profits may want to rebalance to more neutral positions now, he said.

    Can the economic forecast change?

    Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, rear left, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick stand as President Donald Trump signs executive orders and proclamations in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, April 9, 2025.
    Nathan Howard | Reuters

    There’s no guarantee stagflation will happen.
    In 2022, one survey found 80% of economists said stagflation was a long-term risk.
    But it was avoided at that time with a mix of strong economic growth, disinflation and a robust labor market encouraged by the Federal Reserve, Daco said.
    Much of the risks popping up in today’s economic forecasts are the result of White House policies, economists say.
    The Trump administration could reduce stagflation risks, Daco said, by reducing policy uncertainty, easing immigration restrictions that will reduce the labor supply, and not implementing tariffs on major trading partners.
    House said the U.S. entered 2025 with a “well-performing economy,” which he said has been threatened by the Trump administration’s recent policy changes. It is up to the administration to unwind those policies and “prevent stagflation from occurring,” he said.
    The White House did not respond to a request for comment from CNBC. More

  • in

    Elliott Management takes a stake in Hewlett Packard Enterprise. How the firm may create value

    A general view of the Hewlett Packard Enterprise company offices in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on Jan. 3, 2024.
    AaronP | Bauer-Griffin | GC Images | Getty Images

    Company: Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE)

    Business: Hewlett Packard Enterprise is a global edge-to-cloud company. It delivers open and intelligent technology solutions as a service. The company offers cloud services, compute, high performance computing and artificial intelligence, intelligent edge, software and storage. Its segments include Server, Hybrid Cloud, Intelligent Edge, Financial Services, Corporate Investments and Other. Its Server segment offerings consist of general-purpose servers for multi-workload computing, workload-optimized servers, and integrated systems. Its Hybrid Cloud segment offers a range of cloud-native and hybrid solutions across storage, private cloud and the infrastructure software-as-a-service space. Its Intelligent Edge segment offers wired and wireless local area networks, campus, branch, and data center switching, and others. Its Financial Services segment provides flexible investment solutions, such as leasing, financing, IT consumption, utility programs, and asset management services.
    Stock Market Value: $19.88B ($15.14 per share)

    Stock chart icon

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise shares in the past 12 months

    Activist: Elliott Investment Management

    Ownership: ~7.4%
    Average Cost: n/a
    Activist Commentary: Elliott is a very successful and astute activist investor. The firm’s team includes analysts from leading tech private equity firms, engineers, operating partners – former technology CEOs and COOs. When evaluating an investment, Elliott also hires specialty and general management consultants, expert cost analysts and industry specialists. The firm often watches companies for many years before investing and has an extensive stable of impressive board candidates. Elliott has historically focused on strategic activism in the technology sector and has been very successful with that strategy. However, over the past several years its activism group has grown, and the firm has been doing a lot more governance-oriented activism and creating value from a board level at a much larger breadth of companies.

    What’s happening

    Behind the scenes

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) is a global edge-to-cloud company that delivers open and intelligent technology solutions as a service. The company was spun off from HP Inc in 2015. HPQ, the RemainCo, retained the PC, desktop and printer businesses, while HPE, the SpinCo, focuses on servers, storage and networking. The majority of HPE’s revenue (53.8%) is derived from its Server segment, which consists of general-purpose servers for multi-workload computing, workload-optimized servers, and integrated systems. Its Hybrid Cloud segment (17.88%) offers a range of cloud-native and hybrid solutions across storage, private cloud and the infrastructure software-as-a-service space. Its Intelligent Edge segment (15.04%) offers wired and wireless local area networks. The remainder of HPE’s revenue is derived from its financial services, investments and other activities. This comprehensive product portfolio sets HPE apart from peers like Dell or Cisco, which typically lack one or more of these pieces. Despite this unique marketing position the company is still undervalued to its peers. Currently, HPE trades at less than 5-times earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, compared to its closest server peer Dell at over 7-times EBITDA, reflecting a 30% discount.

    The primary driver of HPE’s undervaluation appears to be poor execution and a loss of credibility with the market. In Q1, HPE reported a net revenue decrease in its core Server business. The company attributed this loss to mispricing servers relative to inventory costs, which went unnoticed until late in the quarter. As a result, the stock sold off sharply in the days following the company’s earnings. Meanwhile, Dell reported beats on both revenue and margin for the same quarter. However, this is not an isolated incident, but rather the latest in a history of underperformance. Since Dell resumed trading on the NYSE at the end of 2018, it has outperformed HPE’s returns by over 200%.
    While its Server business is the core business for HPE, much of the opportunity here revolves around the networking business. This is a higher multiple business that Dell does not have. HPE’s Intelligent Edge business accounts for one-third of the company’s profits, and networking peers like Cisco trade at 12-times EBITDA. If Intelligent Edge traded at that multiple it would be worth almost the entire enterprise value of HPE today. That leaves significant value from the company’s core Server business and its Cloud Storage business even if those businesses continued to trade at 5-times EBITDA. That value increases significantly with better management execution and efficiency, which should get those businesses to the 7-times multiple Dell trades at. Furthermore, while HPE’s differentiator is its high multiple networking business, Dell’s primary differentiator is a low-multiple PC and desktop business, so a case can be made that HPE’s analogous businesses should trade at a higher multiple than Dell.
    There is also a major uncertainty that is hanging over HPE – its pending acquisition of Juniper Networks, a networking peer to HPE and Cisco. The $14 billion deal, originally announced in January 2024, has been stalled. Earlier this year, the Department of Justice sued to block the acquisition, saying it would eliminate competition. This uncertainty puts HPE at a crucial inflection point, something that markets inherently dislike – especially when management lacks a track record of savvy execution. The potential complications here are clear: If the deal is blocked, HPE would have over 25% of its market cap in net cash, prompting concerns that management may pursue a rushed and risky acquisition to compensate for this failed transaction. Conversely, if the deal goes through, given HPE’s recent executional missteps, investors may worry whether the company will be able to effectively integrate a business of Juniper’s size. So, even though acquiring Juniper would significantly improve HPE’s profitability mix to almost 50% attributed to the higher multiple networking business, many market participants may be looking at this as a lose-lose. But with the right oversight, it should be a win-win.
    This is where Elliott comes in as a potential value creator for HPE. With sufficient shareholder representation on the board that restores confidence that the company will be keenly attuned to shareholder value, the uncertainty of Juniper could turn into a great opportunity for shareholders regardless of whether it closes or not. If the deal gets blocked and there is strong shareholder representation on the board, shareholders will have confidence that the large net cash position will be used wisely, whether through a diligent and disciplined value-creating acquisition or to buy back shares at these depressed values. If the deal does close, shareholders will have more confidence that a refreshed board will do a better job integrating Juniper. Elliott is one of the most prolific activist investors today with a history of effective and successful strategic activism in the technology sector. In the past 10 years, the firm has engaged 25 technology companies and has delivered an average return of 20.60% versus 8.56% for the Russell 2000 over the same periods. However, in the six of those 25 situations where Elliott received board representation, the firm returned an average of 45.53% versus 15.35% for the Russell 2000 over the same time periods. Importantly, Elliott has a deep familiarity with Juniper, having previously engaged the company from 2014-2015. In this engagement, Elliott called for a slew of capital allocation and strategic initiatives, ultimately settling for board seats for Gary Daichendt and Kevin DeNuccio. Notably, DeNuccio is still on Juniper’s board today.
    While we believe Elliott’s activist campaign and the value at HPE is compelling over a full activist cycle on its own, given the economic climate today, we would be remiss not to mention something about tariffs. HPE is likely in a better position than Dell to face certain geopolitical headwinds. The majority of HPE’s servers comply with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement and are manufactured in Mexico. In contrast, a significant portion of Dell’s PC products are manufactured in China and are therefore significantly more exposed to tariff risks.
    Ken Squire is the founder and president of 13D Monitor, an institutional research service on shareholder activism, and the founder and portfolio manager of the 13D Activist Fund, a mutual fund that invests in a portfolio of activist 13D investments. More

  • in

    IRS’ free tax filing program is at risk amid Trump scrutiny

    The IRS free tax filing program, known as Direct File, has faced heavy Republican scrutiny since its 2024 launch.
    Direct File expanded to more than 30 million taxpayers across 25 states for the 2025 filing season. 
    However, the Trump administration hasn’t yet decided on the future of the program.

    Vithun Khamsong | Moment | Getty Images

    The IRS’ free tax filing program is in jeopardy as the agency faces continued cuts from the Trump administration.
    After a limited pilot launch in 2024, the program, known as Direct File, expanded to more than 30 million taxpayers across 25 states for the 2025 filing season.   

    Funded under the Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, the program has been heavily scrutinized by Republicans, who have criticized the cost and participation rate. Over the past year, Republican lawmakers from both chambers have introduced legislation to halt the IRS’ free filing program.
    Now, some reports say Direct File could be at risk. Meanwhile, no decision has been made yet about the program’s future, according to a White House administration official. 
    More from Personal Finance:Federal Reserve: College is still worth it for most studentsHere’s why retirees shouldn’t fully ditch stocksHere’s how a trade war could impact the price of clothingDuring his Senate confirmation hearing in January, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent committed to keeping Direct File active during the 2025 filing season without commenting on future years.  
    “I will consult and study the program and understand it better and make sure it works to serve the IRS’ three goals of collections, customer service and privacy,” Bessent told the Senate Finance Committee at the hearing. 
    However, the future of the free tax filing program remains unclear.

    As of April 17, the Direct File website said the program would be open until Oct. 15, which is the deadline for taxpayers who filed for a federal tax extension.
    Many taxpayers can also file for free via another program known as IRS Free File, which is a public-private partnership between the IRS and the Free File Alliance, a nonprofit coalition of tax software companies.
    The IRS in May 2024 extended the Free File program through 2029.

    Mixed reviews of IRS Direct File

    Direct File supporters on Wednesday blasted the possible decision to end the program.
    “No one should have to pay huge fees just to file their taxes,” Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said in a statement on Wednesday.
    Wyden described the program as “a massive success, saving taxpayers millions in fees, saving them time and cutting out an unnecessary middleman.”
    In January, more than 130 Democrats, led by Sens. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Chris Coons, D-Del., voiced support for Direct File.

    However, opponents have criticized the program’s participation rate and cost.
    During the 2024 pilot, some 423,450 taxpayers created or signed in to a Direct File account. Roughly one-third of those taxpayers, about 141,000 filers, submitted a return through Direct File, according to a March report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.
    Those figures represent a mid-season 2024 launch in 12 states for only simple returns. It’s unclear how many taxpayers used Direct File through the April 15 deadline.
    The cost for Direct File through the pilot was $24.6 million, the IRS reported in May 2024. Direct File operational costs were an extra $2.4 million, according to the agency. More

  • in

    Is college still worth it? It is for most, but not all, Federal Reserve finds

    Overall, the benefits of a college degree far outweigh the costs. But not all students get the same return on investment.
    Many factors, including how much you have to pay out of pocket and your choice of major, determine the ultimate value, according to a new study by the Federal Reserve.
    For at least one-quarter of graduates, college does not pay off, the Fed researchers found. 

    In general, the economic benefits of a college education still far outweigh the high cost. However, college does not pay off for everyone, according to a new study by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    Many factors, including how much financial aid is offered and how much students have to pay out of pocket, as well as the choice of major, future earnings potential and how long it takes to graduate, determine the actual return on investment, the Fed researchers found. 

    Overall, “majors providing technical training — that is, quantitative and analytical skills—earn the highest return, including engineering, math and computers,” the Fed researchers wrote in the blog post on April 16.
    More from Personal Finance:How to maximize your college financial aid offerTop colleges roll out more generous financial aid packagesCollege hopefuls have a new ultimate dream school
    “While expensive schools and on-campus living may seem to make college a risky bet, our estimates suggest that even a relatively high-cost college education tends to yield a healthy return for the typical graduate,” the Fed researchers said.
    “Taking five or six years to complete a degree also still generally pays off. However, as many as a quarter of college graduates appear to end up in relatively low-paying jobs, and for them, a college degree may not be worth it, at least in terms of the economic payoff,” according to the Fed researchers.

    ‘College continues to get more expensive’

    Meanwhile, studies consistently demonstrate that college costs continue to rise faster than the growth of financial aid. This means families and students are bearing a greater share of the financial burden of higher education. 

    College tuition costs have indeed risen significantly, averaging a 5.6% annual increase since 1983, outpacing inflation and other household expenses. And families now shoulder 48% of college expenses with their income and investments, up from 38% a decade ago, according to a report by J.P. Morgan Asset Management.
    “College continues to get more expensive and even though we’ve made aid more accessible by making the FAFSA [The Free Application for Federal Student Aid] shorter and more digestible, it’s not enough,” said Tricia Scarlata, head of education savings at J.P. Morgan Asset Management. (The new Free Application for Federal Student Aid was meant to improve access by expanding aid eligibility.)

    In fact, these days, more students are opting out. Both bachelor’s degree and associate degree earners fell for the third consecutive year in 2023-24, according to a recent report by the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center.
    “Today’s students want shorter-term, lower-cost credentials that lead to faster employment opportunities,” Doug Shapiro, the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center’s executive director said in a statement.
    “It is certificate programs, not associates or bachelor’s degrees, that are drawing students into colleges today,” Shapiro added.
    Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube. More

  • in

    As national average credit score falls, student loan delinquencies are key factor

    The national average credit score fell for only the second time in a decade, according to a new report from FICO.
    The resumption of federal student loan delinquency reporting on consumers’ credit was a significant contributing factor.
    Severe delinquencies, or 90-day past-due missed payments, surpassed pre-pandemic levels for the first time.

    Consumer debt is rising, and now credit scores have declined.
    The national average FICO credit score dropped to 715 from 717, according to a recent report from FICO, developer of one of the scores most widely used by lenders. FICO scores range between 300 and 850.

    Amid high interest rates and rising debt loads, the share of consumers who fell behind on their payments jumped over the past year, FICO found. Also, the resumption of federal student loan delinquency reporting on consumers’ credit was a significant contributing factor, the report said.
    “Those are now being reported for the first time since March 2020,” said Tommy Lee, senior director of scores and predictive analytics at FICO. “This is really driving the increase in severe delinquencies.”
    More from Personal Finance:Cash may feel safe, but it has risksWhat advisors are telling clients after bond sell-offIs now a good time to buy gold?

    The effects of student loan delinquency reporting

    The Federal Reserve Bank of New York cautioned in a March report that student loan borrowers who are late on their payments would experience “significant drops” in their credit scores.
    Initially, those borrowers benefitted from the pandemic-era forbearance on federal student loans, which marked all delinquent loans as current. Median credit scores for student loan borrowers increased by 11 points between the end of 2019 to the end of 2020, the Fed researchers found. However, that relief period officially ended on Sept. 30, 2024.

    “We expect to see more than nine million student loan borrowers face substantial declines in credit standing over the first quarter of 2025,” the Fed researchers wrote in the blog post last month.
    “Although some of these borrowers may be able to cure their delinquencies,” the Fed researchers said, “the damage to their credit standing will have already been done and will remain on their credit reports for seven years.”
    Lower credit scores could result in reduced credit limits, higher interest rates for new loans and overall lower credit access, the researchers also said.

    During the 2007-2010 housing crisis, average nationwide credit scores fell to 686 due to a surge in foreclosures. They subsequently ticked higher until the Covid-19 pandemic, when government stimulus programs and a spike in household saving helped boost scores to a historic high of 718 in 2023.
    However, last year, FICO scores notched their first decline in over a decade, dropping to 717 in 2024, when rising credit card balances and an uptick in missed payments started to take a toll.
    This year, scores fell even further as severe delinquencies, or 90-day past-due missed payments, surpassed pre-pandemic levels for the first time.

    The consequences of a lower credit score

    In general, the higher your credit score, the better off you are when it comes to getting a loan. Lenders are more likely to approve you for loans when you have a higher credit score, or offer you a better rate. Alternatively, borrowers with lower scores are typically charged more in interest, if they are approved for a loan at all.
    In fact, increasing your credit score to very good (740 to 799) from fair (580 to 669) could save you more than $39,000 over the lifetime of your balances, a recent analysis by LendingTree found — with the largest impact from lower mortgage costs, followed by preferred rates on credit cards, auto loans and personal loans.
    Some of the best ways to improve your credit score come down to paying your bills on time every month and keeping your utilization rate, or the ratio of debt to total credit, below 30% to limit the effect that high balances can have, FICO’s Lee said.
    A good score generally is above 670, a very good score is over 740 and anything above 800 is considered exceptional.
    An average score of 715 by FICO measurements means most lenders will consider your creditworthiness “good” and are more likely to extend lower rates.
    “There are still many consumers that are managing their payments very well,” Lee said. “On the other hand, the decline [in average credit scores] does indicate there are some consumers being impacted by the current economy.”
    Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube. More

  • in

    How a trade war could impact the price of clothing: ‘Ultimately no one wins,’ expert says

    Few consumer goods are immune from the effects of new tariffs on imported goods, but apparel may be among the hardest hit.
    The U.S. gets 97% of clothing and shoes from other countries, a report by the American Apparel & Footwear Association found.
    Tariffs “will be passed along to the end consumer,” says the National Retail Federation’s executive vice president of government relations, David French.
    Most consumers have already started to change their shopping habits accordingly.

    Women shop for clothing from a Gap outlet store in Los Angeles, California on April 10, 2025. 
    Frederic J. Brown | Afp | Getty Images

    Few consumer products are immune from the impact of new tariffs on goods imported into the United States, but apparel may be among the hardest hit.
    A trade war could significantly raise the price of clothing for consumers. Since a large portion of U.S. clothing and shoes are imported, tariffs on those goods would increase the cost for both the importers and, ultimately, the consumer, experts say.

    “The 2025 tariffs disproportionately affect clothing and textiles, with consumers facing 64% higher apparel prices in the short-run,” according to forecasts by the Yale University Budget Lab. “Apparel prices will stay 27% higher in the long-run.”
    For now, the Trump Administration has opted for a universal tariff rate of 10%. Earlier this month, the White House imposed 145% tariffs on products from China. President Donald Trump recently granted exclusions from steep tariffs on smartphones, computers and some other electronics imported largely from China.
    “We are concerned about the escalating trade war with China. Ultimately no one wins,” said Julia Hughes president of the United States Fashion Industry Association.
    More from Personal Finance:Is now a good time to buy gold? What you need to knowMajority of Americans financially stressed from tariff turmoilWhy the stock market hates tariffs and trade wars
    “This policy continues to subject U.S. imports of our industry’s largest trading partner to an unsustainable tax,” Steve Lamar, the American Apparel & Footwear Association’s president and CEO, said in a prepared statement. 

    Tariffs, particularly on clothing and materials, which are not made at scale in the U.S., will lead to higher prices for consumers and will only fuel inflation, according to the American Apparel & Footwear Association.
    The U.S. receives 97% percent of clothing and shoes from other countries, but primarily China and Vietnam, a 2024 report by the American Apparel & Footwear Association found.

    Tariffs ‘will be passed along to the consumer’

    “Tariffs are a tax paid by the U.S. importer that will be passed along to the end consumer. Tariffs will not be paid by foreign countries or suppliers,” the National Retail Federation’s executive vice president of government relations, David French, said in a statement.
    As part of the new high tariffs on China, Trump also revoked a popular tax loophole known as de minimis. The exemption allowed many e-commerce companies to send goods worth less than $800 into the U.S. duty-free. The loophole also allowed American shoppers to buy low-cost goods directly from retailers in China and Hong Kong.
    Some popular clothing brands, like Shein and Temu imported from China, could face an immediate impact and will likely funnel those extra costs to customers in the way of higher prices, which would hit low- and middle-class Americans particularly hard.

    How consumers plan to cushion the blow

    Three-quarters of consumers said they’re already engaging in “trade-down” behavior when purchasing clothing and footwear, according to recent research by Empower.
    In the years since high inflation made clothing more expensive, a shift was already starting.
    Shoppers downgraded to more affordable secondhand merchandise and embraced buying “dupes” — short for duplicates.
    “If you can’t afford Louis Vuitton, you are going to buy Coach. If you can’t afford Coach, you are going to buy the knock off,” said Shawn Grain Carter, an associate professor at the Fashion Institute of Technology, part of the State University of New York.

    Historically, trade restrictions drive up the cost of authentic goods, creating the perfect conditions for counterfeiters to flood the market with cheaper, harder-to-detect fakes, according to Vidyuth Srinivasan, co-founder and CEO of Entrupy, an authentication service.
    With Trump’s recent executive order eliminating duty-free de minimis treatment for low-value imports, the flow of counterfeit goods will also be more expensive and logistically challenging, Srinivasan explained.
    However, “counterfeiters are incredibly agile,” he said. “When one route is blocked, they’ll adapt, seeking alternative distribution channels to continue flooding the market with fakes.”
    Alternatively, “there might be a little more of a lean into the secondhand market because it just seems more affordable,” Srinivasan said. 

    Faced with higher costs, 67% of consumers plan to change their shopping habits, according to another recent report by Bid-on-Equipment. Among the top strategies, 46% say they will shop at thrift or secondhand stores. Other ways to save include comparison shopping or buying fewer imported goods. The survey polled more than 1,000 adults in January.
    In another survey by shopping app Smarty, 50% of respondents said they’re more likely to consider secondhand goods or local alternatives because of tariff-induced price hikes.
    “Tariffs are already prompting my customers to even more actively seek alternatives when it comes to luxury designer goods,” said Christos Garkinos, the CEO and founder of online reseller Covet By Christos.
    “On the one hand, customers who are looking to make some extra money in this volatile economy are considering selling off parts of their designer collections,” Garkinos said.
    “On the flip side, so many of my existing customers are doubling down on resale,” he said, “because they know that there is no tariff to pay and they can still get their hands on luxury goods without paying that extra premium right now.”
    The U.S. resale market is experiencing significant growth, with projections indicating it will continue to expand rapidly over the next few years. This growth is being driven by factors like rising consumer preference for secondhand options, especially among younger generations, and the increasing adoption of online resale platforms, experts say.
    Re-commerce — which encompasses the buying and selling of preowned, refurbished or secondhand goods  — is projected to increase 55%, reaching $291.6 billion by 2029. That would outpace the overall retail market, with resale potentially accounting for 8% of total retail by 2029, according to a 2024 report by OfferUp, an online marketplace for buying and selling new and used items.
    Still, there aren’t enough secondhand products to satisfy consumer demand, Hughes said. “The quantities aren’t there.”
    For now, the apparel industry must wait and see what will happen with potential trade agreements going forward, just as back-to-school inventory — one of the most important shopping seasons of the year — is set to start shipping, Hughes said.
    “The chaos is still rippling through,” she added. “This is a real time of uncertainty.”
    Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More