More stories

  • in

    Global ETFs slide as investors see Trump tariff policies hurting trade

    Funds tracking international equities largely pulled back as investors reacted to Donald Trump’s win.
    It marks a stark contrast to rallying U.S. equities.

    A balcony above a trading floor inside the Euronext NV stock exchange in Paris on March 13, 2023.
    Nathan Laine | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Several U.S.-listed funds tracking global stocks pulled back in Wednesday’s session as investors considered Donald Trump’s victory harmful to international equities.
    Closely followed exchange-traded funds from iShares tracking South Korea, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Chile all slid on Wednesday. That comes despite major U.S. indexes soaring to record highs.

    Those idiosyncratic pullbacks come as traders ready for President-elect Trump’s proposed policies for taxing imports. He has floated a tariff of up to 20% on all goods coming into the U.S., with an especially high 60% levy on those coming from China specifically.
    This policy was unpopular among voters, according to NBC News polling. But it appeared inconsequential in the race, despite the economy more broadly being a main issue for Americans heading to the polls.
    “While the investing landscape remains favorable in the U.S., international markets are very exposed to tariff policy, ” said Yung-Yu Ma, chief investment officer at BMO Wealth Management. “That uncertainty could limit near-term upside in global stocks.”
    These moves reflect the divergence between U.S. and international markets as investors around the globe take in America’s election results.
    While the Dow Jones Industrial Average notched its best day in around two years, European markets largely struggled on Wednesday as it become clear that Trump would prevail. In the U.S. market, the iShares Core MSCI Europe ETF (IEUR) slid more than 2%.

    Asia-Pacific markets were more mixed, with Japan’s Nikkei 225 bucking the downtrend. Still, the U.S.-listed iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) shed more than 2% on Wednesday.
    However, the Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) climbed around 3% and touched a new 52-week high, a rare bright spot among international-focused funds. The South American country last year elected libertarian Javier Milei, who was compared widely to Trump, as president.
    The ICE U.S. Dollar Index, which tracks to the U.S. greenback against a basket of international currencies, reached its highest level since July. LPL Financial chief technical strategist Adam Turnquist noted that the dollar’s rally comes as inflation expectations rose following Trump’s victory.
    Turnquist said continued strength in the American currency can hurt international stocks, particularly emerging markets. These markets have underperformed U.S. counterparts in recent years. Indeed, the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) slid more than 1% on Wednesday.
    — CNBC’s Sarah Min, Jesse Pound and Hakyung Kim contributed to this report.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Trump promised no taxes on Social Security benefits. It’s too soon to plan on that change, experts say

    President-elect Donald Trump has promised to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits.
    Even with a Republican majority in Congress, that proposal could face hurdles.
    Experts say it’s still too early to factor that change into financial plans.

    Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump arrives to speak at his rally during the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election, in Palm Beach County Convention Center, in West Palm Beach, Florida, U.S., November 6, 2024.
    Brendan Mcdermid | Reuters

    On the campaign trail, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump made a notable promise to retirees: No taxes on Social Security benefits.
    Now that Trump has won a second presidential term, that may prompt Social Security’s beneficiaries to wonder whether that change may come to pass.

    But nixing those taxes may be a difficult task, even if Trump has a Republican majority in both the Senate and the House of Representatives. Any changes to Social Security would require at least 60 Senate votes, and Republicans would therefore need some Democratic support to pass those changes.
    Just eliminating taxes on benefits, without any other changes to make up for that loss in revenues, would worsen the program’s current funding woes, experts say.
    “It’s hard for me to imagine that Democrats would be willing to provide votes to get over that 60-vote threshold and weaken Social Security solvency,” said Charles Blahous, senior research strategist at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, who has also served as a public trustee for Social Security and Medicare.
    “I think a lot of Republicans would have heartburn about it, too,” he said.
    More from Personal Finance:Presidential election is prompting some Americans to ‘doom spend’What top advisors tell investors about the markets during electionsHow the ‘vibecession’ is influencing investors this election year

    Ending taxes on Social Security benefits — along with other Trump proposals to end taxes on tips and overtime, impose tariffs and deport immigrants — would “dramatically worsen” Social Security’s finances, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget found in a recent report.
    The Trump campaign has pushed back on those findings, calling the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget “consistently wrong” in a statement to CNBC when the report was released.
    The campaign did not respond to a request for comment on Wednesday, about where the proposal stands on Trump’s priority list following his inauguration.
    The Social Security trust fund used to help pay retirement benefits is projected to run out in 2033, according to the program’s actuaries. At that time, beneficiaries could see across-the-board benefit cuts, though the president may have the ability to determine how those reductions are distributed among beneficiaries, according to recent research.

    Higher-income seniors would benefit most

    Experts say those who would benefit most from eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits would be the wealthy.
    Households with between $63,000 and $200,000 in income would benefit most from the change, according to an August analysis from the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.
    Lower income households making $32,000 or less would not get a tax cut, as most of their Social Security benefits are not currently taxed. Meanwhile, those with between $32,000 and $60,000 in annual income may see about $90 in tax cuts, according to the research.
    “You’re giving a tax break to the higher-income senior population, so that might wind up mitigating its political sale ability as well,” Blahous said.

    Currently, up to 85% of Social Security benefits may be taxed based on an individual’s or married couple’s income. Those taxes are determined based on a formula called combined income, or the sum of adjusted gross income, nontaxable interest and half of Social Security benefits.
    Individuals face up to 85% in taxes on their benefits if they have more than $34,000 in combined income; for married couples that applies if their combined income is more than $44,000.
    Individual beneficiaries may pay taxes on up to 50% of their benefits on combined income between $25,000 and $34,000, or for married couples with between $32,000 and $44,000.
    Because those thresholds are not adjusted, more Social Security benefit income becomes subject to income taxes over time.

    For now, financial advisors say it is too early to factor in the elimination of taxes on benefits into financial plans.
    “You don’t know what the law or policy is going to be if it hasn’t even been properly drafted yet, much less adopted,” said David Haas, a certified financial planner and owner of Cereus Financial Advisors in Franklin Lakes, New Jersey.
    “I wouldn’t jump to any conclusions,” he said. More

  • in

    Here’s what President-elect Trump’s tariff plan may mean for your wallet

    On the campaign trail, President-elect Donald Trump proposed sweeping new tariff policies that economists say would stoke inflation and hurt the U.S. economy.
    The Tax Policy Center and Peterson Institute for International Economics predict the typical U.S. household would pay roughly $2,600 to $3,000 more per year due to higher prices.

    Donald Trump speaks at a rally on Nov. 5, 2024 in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
    Scott Olson | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    President-elect Donald Trump won Tuesday’s presidential election partly by addressing Americans’ economic anxieties over higher prices.
    Nearly half of all voters said they were worse off financially than they were four years ago, the highest level in any election since 2008, according to an NBC News exit poll.

    But a cornerstone of Trump’s economic policy — sweeping new tariffs on imported goods — would likely exacerbate the very Biden-era inflation Trump lambasted on the campaign trail, according to economists.  
    There’s still much uncertainty around how and when such tariffs might be implemented. If they were to take effect, they would likely raise prices for American consumers and disproportionately hurt lower earners, economists said.
    The typical U.S. household would pay several thousand more dollars each year on clothing, furniture, appliances and other goods, estimates suggest.

    “It’s bad for consumers,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s. “It’s a tax on consumers in the form of higher prices for imported goods.”
    “It’s inflationary,” he added.

    He and other economists predict the proposed tariffs would also lead to job loss and slower economic growth, on a net basis.
    The Trump campaign didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment from CNBC on the impact of tariffs or their scope.

    How Trump’s tariff proposal might work

    A tariff is a tax placed on imported goods.
    Tariffs have been around for centuries. However, their importance as a source of government revenue has declined, especially among wealthy nations, according to Monica Morlacco, an international trade expert and assistant professor of economics at the University of Southern California.
    Now, the U.S. largely uses tariffs as a protectionist policy to shield certain industries from foreign competition, according to the Brookings Institution, a think tank.
    More from Personal Finance:Presidential election prompts Americans to ‘doom spend’Next U.S. president could face a tax battle in 2025How the ‘vibecession’ influences investors
    Trump imposed some tariffs in his first term — on washing machines, solar panels, steel, aluminum and a range of Chinese goods, for example. The Biden administration kept many of those intact.
    However, Trump’s proposals from the campaign trail are much broader, economists said.
    He has floated a 10% or 20% universal tariff on all imports and a tariff of at least 60% on Chinese goods, for example. Last month, the president-elect suggested vehicles from Mexico have a tariff of 200% or more, and in September threatened to impose a similar amount on John Deere if the company were to shift some production from the U.S. to Mexico.
    “To me, the most beautiful word in the dictionary is ‘tariff,'” Trump said at the Chicago Economic Club in October. “It’s my favorite word. It needs a public relations firm.”

    How much tariffs cost consumers

    A 20% worldwide tariff and a 60% levy on Chinese goods would raise costs by $3,000 in 2025 for the average U.S. household, according to an October analysis by the Tax Policy Center. Trump’s plan would reduce average after-tax incomes by almost 3%, according to the tax think tank.
    Additionally, a 200% Mexico-vehicle tariff would increase household costs by an average $600, TPC said.
    American consumers would lose $46 billion to $78 billion a year in spending power on apparel, toys, furniture, household appliances, footwear and travel goods, according to a National Retail Federation analysis published Monday.
    “I feel pretty confident saying [tariffs] are a price-raising policy,” said Mike Pugliese, senior economist at Wells Fargo Economics. “The question is just the magnitude.”

    The reason for these higher costs: Tariffs are paid by U.S. companies that import goods. The “vast majority” of that additional cost is passed on to American consumers, while only some of it is paid for by U.S. distributors and retailers or by foreign producers, said Zandi of Moody’s.
    Philip Daniele, president and CEO of AutoZone, alluded to this dynamic in a recent earnings call.
    “If we get tariffs, we will pass those tariff costs back to the consumer,” Daniele said in September.
    The U.S. imported about $3.2 trillion of goods in 2022, for example, said Olivia Cross, a North America economist at Capital Economics. A back-of-the-envelope calculation suggests a 10% across-the-board tariff would be roughly equivalent to a $320 billion tax on consumers, Cross said.

    Tariffs reduce economic growth and jobs

    Of course, the financial fallout likely wouldn’t be quite that large, Cross said.
    Trump’s plan could boost the strength of the U.S. dollar, and there may also be tariff exemptions for certain categories of goods or imports from certain countries, all of which would likely blunt the overall impact, Cross said.

    A 20% universal tariff and 60% Chinese import tax would also generate about $4.5 trillion in net new revenue for the federal government over 10 years, according to the Tax Policy Center.
    “The administration could take tariff revenue and redistribute to households via tax cuts in some form or another,” explained Pugliese of Wells Fargo.
    Trump has proposed various tax breaks on the campaign trail. Additionally, tax cuts enacted by Trump in 2017 are due to expire next year, and tariff revenue may potentially be used to extend them, should Congress pass such legislation, economists said.
    However, the typical U.S. household would still lose $2,600 a year from Trump’s tariff plan, even after accounting for an extension of the 2017 tax cuts, according to an analysis by the Peterson Institute for International Economics.

    The U.S. economy would also likely suffer due to other tariff “cross currents,” Zandi said.
    While U.S. companies that financially benefit from protectionist tariff policies may add jobs, the total economy would likely shed jobs on a net basis, Zandi said.
    This is because countries on which the U.S. imposes tariffs would likely retaliate with their own tariffs on U.S. exports, hurting the bottom lines of domestic businesses that export goods, for example, Zandi said.
    Higher prices for imported goods would likely also lead to lower consumer demand, weighing on business profits and perhaps leading to layoffs, he said.
    In June, the Tax Foundation estimated Trump’s tariff plan would shrink U.S. employment by 684,000 full-time jobs and reduce its gross domestic product, a measure of economic output, by at least 0.8%.
    Capital Economics expects the Trump administration would introduce tariffs — and a curb on immigration — in the second quarter of next year, the group said in a note Tuesday night. Together, those policies would cut Gross Domestic Product growth by about 1% from the second half of 2025 through the first half of 2026 and add 1 percentage point to inflation, it said. More

  • in

    Trump Media shares surge more than 30% as Trump wins presidential election

    Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump dances after speaking following early results from the 2024 U.S. presidential election in Palm Beach County Convention Center, in West Palm Beach, Florida, U.S., November 6, 2024.
    Carlos Barria | Reuters

    Shares in former President Donald Trump’s media company pushed higher in early trading as NBC News results projected him winning the contentious presidential election.
    Trump Media & Technology Group were last up about 30%, paring gains from earlier in the premarket session that pushed shares up about 50% and above $51 a share.

    The stock extended its run overnight as Trump gained a solid Electoral College lead, and narrowed the path to victory for Vice President Kamala Harris.
    The stock, seen as a market proxy for the former president, rallied despite a surprise earnings statement after the bell that showed the company lost $19.2 million in the third quarter. The operator of Truth Social is majority owned by Trump.
    Shares have been volatile during the election season, rising and falling as Trump’s fortunes swirled during his neck-and-neck race with Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris.
    The shares were down more than 34% over the past five trading sessions as Harris seemingly picked up momentum in the race’s final days. However, the stock, with ticker DJT after the Republican’s initials, has soared more than 105% over the past month.
    In Tuesday’s session, as the candidates made their closing push, the stock burst more than 18% at its session high, only to close down 1.2%.

    Stock chart icon

    Trump Media & Technology Group shares

    In the earnings release, the company reported revenue of just over $1 million.
    “This has been an extraordinary quarter for the Company, for Truth Social users, and for our legion of retail investors who support our mission to serve as a beachhead for free speech on the Internet,” Trump Media CEO Devin Nunes said in a statement.
    Nunes is a former congressman from California.
    To be sure, the stock is not necessarily a perfect play on whether Trump wins. The stock could be influenced by other factors such as profit-taking, given its hefty gains already this year. More

  • in

    Bank stocks advance as traders bet on less regulation in a Trump presidency

    Citigroup, Bank of America and Wells Fargo advanced in premarket trading.
    The move comes as Donald Trump secured victory in the presidential election.

    Omar Marques | Lightrocket | Getty Images

    Shares of major banks climbed on Wednesday as investors look toward Donald Trump’s victory in the presidential election and bet it will lead to less regulation for the sector.
    Citigroup jumped about 8% in premarket trading. Bank of America added 8%, while Wells Fargo and Goldman Sachs each popped 8% and 7%.

    Former President Donald Trump gained a solid lead over Vice President Kamala Harris into the early hours of Wednesday and solidified his second term with a win in the swing state of Wisconsin, per NBC News’ projection.
    Bank stocks are expected to benefit under GOP control given the party’s posture toward deregulation. TD Cowen analyst Jaret Seiberg noted a pullback on Consumer Financial Protection Bureau oversight can particularly benefit finance names.
    “Donald Trump is the candidate where you ignore what he says and focus on what you expect him to do,” Seiberg wrote in a note to clients recently. “It is why he offers the promise of deregulation for financials as his regulators are likely to roll back much of the CFPB enforcement agenda and rethink safety and soundness changes for big banks.”
    Seiberg said trading banks can specifically gain given the likelihood of lower capital requirements, credit card late fee policies remaining and help on crypto regulations. But he warned that there’s downside risk tied to Trump’s plans for tariffs and deportations, which can said could be inflationary. More

  • in

    Solar stocks tumble on fears Trump will hamper clean energy progress, repeal IRA

    Solar stocks are selling off as clean energy investors digest Donald Trump’s forthcoming second White House term.
    Traders are worried that Trump could repeal the Inflation Reduction Act if Republicans manage to secure unified control of government.
    The Invesco Solar ETF was off by 7% in premarket trading.

    Copper Mountain Solar in El Dorado Valley, pictured on Thursday, Sept. 5, 2024, in Boulder City, Nevada. (Bizuayehu Tesfaye/Las Vegas Review-Journal/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)
    Bizuayehu Tesfaye | Tribune News Service | Getty Images

    Solar stocks sold off premarket after Donald Trump secured a second trip to the White House.
    Solar stocks are falling on fears that Trump’s second term would spell trouble for the Inflation Reduction Act, which has fueled a clean energy boom in the U.S. through tax credits to expand solar energy.

    NBC News projected that Trump had gained a sizable Electoral College lead to win the presidency early Wednesday morning.
    The benchmark Invesco Solar ETF was down more than 11% in premarket trading. The solar panel manufacturer First Solar tumbled 14%. Residential solar stocks Sunrun and Sunnova fell 18% and 21%, respectively. Inverter manufacturer Enphase tumbled 12% and Nextracker was down nearly 12%.
    Trump’s campaign platform calls for the termination of the IRA, which he refers to as the “Socialist Green New Deal.” The IRA is one of President Joe Biden’s signature achievements. The law passed on party-line vote in 2022 without any Republican support.
    The future of the IRA, however, will depend not only on whether Trump wins the White House, but whether Republicans also secure control of Congress.
    Kamala Harris’ campaign chair Jen O’Malley Dillon told staff in an email Tuesday that the clearest path to victory for the vice president was in the so-called Blue Wall states of Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. However, Trump secured his second trip to the White House by penetrating the Democratic stronghold with a win in Wisconsin. More

  • in

    Wednesday’s big stock stories: What’s likely to move the market in the next trading session

    Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. 

    Stocks @ Night is a daily newsletter delivered after hours, giving you a first look at tomorrow and last look at today. Sign up for free to receive it directly in your inbox.
    Here’s what CNBC TV’s producers were watching as Wall Street awaited the results of the U.S. election, and what’s on the radar for the next session.
    On this election night, here’s where we stand

    The S&P 500 is up 21.2% year to date, closing at 5,782.76 on Tuesday. It stands 1.63% from the 52-week high.
    The Nasdaq Composite is up 22.8% year to date, ending the day at 18,439.17. The index is 1.84% from the high.
    The Dow Jones Industrial Average is up 12% year to date, and closed at 42,221.88. It’s 2.55% from the high.
    The Russell 2000 is up 11.5% year to date. The index is 1.7% from the high.

    Stock chart icon

    S&P 500 in 2024

    Trump Media & Technology Group

    Former President Donald Trump’s social media company reported a loss of $19.2 million dollars in the third quarter.
    Trump Media shares were volatile in trading Tuesday and finished down nearly 1.2%. Shares are higher in extended trading on election night, however.

    Bonds

    Bitcoin

    At around 7:10 p.m. on the East Coast, bitcoin is trading at about $69,700.
    It is up about 65% so far in 2024.

    Here are some key earnings due Wednesday

    CVS Health is down 4.3% in the past three months. The latest quarterly numbers come out before the bell. The stock is 33% from the January high.
    Toyota Motors is up 3.8% in three months. The stock is 31.5% from the March high.
    Honda is up 4.4% in the past three months. The stock is 20% from the March high.
    Macerich is a real estate investment trust that owns shopping centers. The stock is up 32% in three months, just off the high hit last week.    
    Owens Corning is up 11% in three months. Shares are 4.6% from the 52-week high. 

    Stock chart icon

    Owens Corning in the past three months

    In the afternoon

    Qualcomm is slated to report. The stock is up 5% over the past three months. Qualcomm is 28% from the June high.
    Arm Holdings is up 27% in three months. Shares are 25.5% from the July high. More

  • in

    Average age of first-time homebuyers is 38, an all-time high. Here’s what that says about the real estate market

    In 2024, the median first-time homebuyer was 38 years old, according to the National Association of Realtors’ 2024 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers report. 
    Factors including low inventory, wealthy competitors and high rent costs make it harder to buy a home for the first time, experts say.

    Courtneyk | E+ | Getty Images

    First-time homebuyers in the U.S. are getting older.
    The median first-time homebuyer has reached an all-time high age of 38 years old, three years older than in July 2023, according to the National Association of Realtors’ 2024 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers report. This summer, the NAR polled 5,390 buyers who purchased a primary residence between July 2023 and June 2024.

    In the 1980s, the typical first-time buyer was in their late 20s.
    “The first-time homebuyer who can enter into today’s market is older, has a higher income [and] is wealthier,” said Jessica Lautz, deputy chief economist at NAR, pointing out that higher home prices require bigger down payments.
    Additionally, the share of first-time homebuyers on the market decreased over the past year from 32% to 24%, the lowest since NAR began collecting data in 1981.
    Factors including the nationwide housing shortage, competition against wealthier buyers and high rent prices make it more difficult for younger adults to buy their first home, according to experts.

    ‘The biggest issue of housing today’

    The housing shortage in the U.S. is “the biggest issue of housing today,” said Orphe Divounguy, senior economist at Zillow.

    As of mid-2023, there is a housing shortage of four million homes, according to the NAR. Construction of new homes has been slow in recent years, and more buyers are competing for available homes, pushing up prices.
    “We do need affordable housing,” said Jonathan Scott, co-host of the HGTV series “Property Brothers.” “It’s going to affect all of us if we don’t start acting now.”
    During a recent CNBC Your Money event, Scott said a sustained housing shortage could dramatically influence first-time buyers over the long run. “Give it another 20 years and literally no young person will be able to afford to purchase a home, period,” Scott said.

    Building activity has somewhat improved. Single-family housing starts in the U.S., a measure of new homes that began construction, grew to 1,027,000 in September, according to U.S. Census data. That is a 2.7% jump from August.
    Yet, “we are still in a very, very constrained market,” said Selma Hepp, chief economist at CoreLogic. “Because of fewer homes on the market, you have more pressure on home prices.”
    In August, the cost of a typical starter home was $250,000, up from $240,000 a year prior, according to Redfin.

    ‘The winners in today’s housing market’

    The housing market is dominated by repeat homebuyers and sellers, or those who have owned and sold homes more than once. Prior homeownership gives them access to home equity to tap, in some cases enough to buy homes outright.
    About a quarter, or 26%, of homebuyers paid cash for their home, an all-time high for cash buyers, the NAR found.
    U.S. homeowners with mortgages have a net homeowner equity of more than $17.6 trillion in the second quarter of 2024, according to CoreLogic. Home equity increased in the second quarter of this year by $1.3 trillion, an 8.0% growth from a year prior.
    More from Personal Finance:Buying a home is ‘a way to increase your net worth over time’How the ‘vibecession’ is influencing investors this election yearShould I pay off my mortgage in retirement?
    Baby boomers and retirees are “the winners in today’s housing market,” said Lautz. The typical repeat homebuyer is now 61 years old, and sellers are typically 63, per the NAR report.
    “When we look at the average homebuyer, for older buyers, they have about $300,000 in home equity versus younger millennial buyers,” Hepp said.

    ‘We’re seeing renters staying renters for longer’

    Other factors such as high rent costs and elevated debt-to-income ratios make it hard for would-be buyers to save for a home, experts say. 
    Rent prices increased faster than tenants’ wages during the Covid-19 pandemic. In 2022, rent growth peaked at 16% at an annual basis, Divounguy said. That same year, wage growth peaked at 9.3%, according to data from Indeed.
    The price jump meant the typical renter spent about 31% of their income on rent. About half of renter households were “cost burdened,” meaning they spent more than 30% of their income on housing.
    “We’re seeing renters staying renters for longer because affordability has been so squeezed,” he said.
    High rent prices not only affect your ability to save money to buy a home, but it can also affect your ability to pay down any existing debt, Lautz said.

    For instance, if a potential buyer has outstanding student loans, their monthly rent cost could make it harder for them to make larger payments toward their debt balance, she said.
    That in turn influences your debt-to-income ratio, or how much money you’re paying every month toward debt. That is an important factor when qualifying for a mortgage. Essentially, lenders consider the DTI to see if a borrower can sustain a mortgage payment on top of existing loan obligations.
    “All of these things snowball, especially in an inflationary environment,” Lautz said.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More