More stories

  • in

    Are designer handbags an actual investment? Here’s how returns stack up

    As far as investments go, only a few luxury designer handbags gain, rather than lose, value over time.
    Hermes Birkin bags have an average annual increase in value of 14.2%, outperforming the S&P 500.
    However, framing such designer purchases as “investments” does women a disservice, experts say.

    Luxury handbags have outperformed other collectibles in recent years and are increasingly viewed as a potential investment category in the eyes of consumers and analysts, at least according to some recent reports.
    For the first time, the value proposition of designer handbags from top brands, such as Hermes, Chanel, Goyard and Louis Vuitton are growing across the board, one report by luxury resale site Rebag found last year. 

    “These trends signal exciting investment opportunities across both heritage and more attainable brands,” the Rebag report said.
    Handbags are among the least volatile of any collectible asset and offer a good risk versus reward, they have also proven to be a worthwhile hedge against inflation, according to a separate 2022 study by Credit Suisse.
    However, while some designer handbags, particularly classic and sought-after styles, can potentially retain or even increase in value over time, they are not a traditional investment in the way stocks or real estate are, expert say.
    More from Personal Finance:What financial advisors tell investors about market turmoilConsumer outlook sinks as recession fears take holdDon’t hide cash at home — here’s what you’re risking
    Over the last two decades, luxury handbags went from being an accessory to what is now “the only female-centric collecting category,” according to a 2020 report by Art Market Research.

    For women, however, the evolution of such increasingly expensive purchases has come at a price, said Jasmine Tucker, the National Women’s Law Center’s vice president of research.
    “In order to appear that you are in your place, you have to look a certain way, and that grooming can cost more for women, and they are doing that at a lower pay,” Tucker said.

    A Hermes Birkin bag in a window display at a KaDeWe department store in Berlin, Germany, on Friday, Jan. 3, 2025. 
    Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    As far as investments go, only a few luxury bags gain, rather than lose, value over time.
    Historically, just the Hermes Birkin and the small group of other top designer bags have value retention rates near 90% or higher, Rebag found. 
    Birkin bags, especially, have increased in value year over year, with an average annual jump in value of 14.2% between 1980 and 2015, according to another study by Baghunter. The bags currently retail for $9,000 and up but can resell for $30,000 or more, depending on size, color and condition.
    Meanwhile, since stocks go up and down, the S&P 500 index has an average annualized return of around 10%.

    A bag may be a ‘smart purchase,’ not an ‘investment’

    Framing a designer handbag as as “investment” does women a disservice, according to Carolyn McClanahan, a certified financial planner and founder of Life Planning Partners in Jacksonville, Florida.
    “It grosses me out when I see purchases positioned as investments, it hits me the wrong way,” McClanahan said.
    “I am totally for people buying nice things, but I wouldn’t call it an investment,” said McClanahan, who also is a member of CNBC’s Advisor Council.
    “If you have a handbag you know you will keep forever, maybe that could be considered a smart purchase,” she said. “But you still need to make sure you are spending less than you make and you are saving.”
    At some point in their lives, most women will likely be on their own and solely in charge of their finances, McClanahan said, that makes it more imperative that women are planning and investing for the future.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Carl Icahn brings two directors to Caesars’ board. What could be next as the activist aims to build value

    Caesars Palace hotel and casino in Las Vegas, Nevada, US, on Saturday, June 1, 2024. 
    Rhonda Churcill | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Company: Caesars Entertainment Inc (CZR)

    Business: Caesars Entertainment is a diversified gaming and hospitality company which operates through several segments: Las Vegas, Regional, Caesars Digital, and Managed and Branded, in addition to Corporate and Other. Its Las Vegas Segment properties include The Cromwell, Flamingo Las Vegas and The LINQ Hotel & Casino. Its Regional properties include Circus Circus Reno, Grand Victoria Casino and Horseshoe Baltimore. Its Managed and Branded properties include Harrah’s Ak-Chin, Harrah’s Cherokee, and Harrah’s Cherokee Valley River. Its resorts operate primarily under the Caesars, Harrah’s, Horseshoe and Eldorado brand names. It offers diversified gaming, entertainment and hospitality amenities, destinations, and a full suite of mobile and online gaming and sports betting experiences.
    Stock Market Value: $5.8B ($27.36 per share)

    Stock chart icon

    Caesars Entertainment over the past 12 months

    Activist: Carl Icahn

    Ownership: 1.15%
    Average Cost: n/a
    Activist Commentary: Carl Icahn is the grandfather of shareholder activism and a true pioneer of the strategy. He is very passionate about shareholder rights and good corporate governance and will go to extreme lengths to fight incompetent boards and management teams to protect shareholder value. Icahn has invested across all sectors over his more than six-decade long career, and he has a tremendous history of creating value at casinos. In 1998, Icahn acquired the Stratosphere casino operations, fixed it up, grew it and sold it for more than $1 billion about a decade later. Icahn acquired an interest in Tropicana in 2008 when it was bankrupt, brought in new leadership and restructured it and sold it in April 2018 for $1.85 billion. And of course, he disclosed a stake in Caesars in 2019, replaced departing CEO Mark Frissora and orchestrated the Eldorado merger.

    What’s happening

    Earlier this month, Carl Icahn and Caesars reached an agreement in which the company consented to expanding the size of the board to 12 directors and appointing Jesse Lynn (general counsel of Icahn Enterprises) and Ted Papapostolou (chief financial officer of Icahn Enterprises) as directors to the company’s board. Icahn agreed to abide by certain customary standstill and voting provisions.

    Behind the scenes

    This is not Carl Icahn’s first foray at Caesars. He filed a 13D in February 2019 stating then that he believed the board should conduct a strategic review with a view toward a sale of the company being the optimal path to shareholder value creation. On March 1, 2019, Icahn and Caesars entered into a director appointment and nomination agreement, pursuant to which John Boushy, Matthew Ferko and Christopher Williams resigned from the board and James Nelson, Courtney Mather and Keith Cozza were appointed to fill the resulting vacancies. On July 20, 2020, Caesars merged with Eldorado to form Caesars Entertainment with Icahn’s support. Courtney Mather is still on the board of Caesars but no longer works for Carl Icahn.

    Since the merger, Caesars has been attempting to strengthen its balance sheet, pursuing strategic divestments and acquisitions and expanding into the growing digital gaming market along with the rest of the brick-and-mortar gaming industry. Many of these initiatives have been successful and some have been disappointing. On Oct. 1, 2021, Caesars’ stock price topped $119 per share. Now, almost five years later, the stock has dropped back below the price when Icahn merged Caesars with Eldorado in 2020 – in the heart of Covid – despite revenue increasing from $9.6 billion in 2021 to $11.2 billion today and operating income increasing from $1.7 billion to $2.3 billion over those respective periods. Icahn clearly sees a great business at a very attractive price.
    Icahn and the company recently entered into an agreement in which Caesar agreed to expand the size of the board to 12 and appoint Jesse Lynn (general counsel of Icahn Enterprises) and Ted Papapostolou (chief financial officer of Icahn Enterprises) to the company’s board. In the press release announcing this agreement, Icahn stated that they, “look forward to working with [management] and the Board to maximize value for all shareholders, including by exploring strategic alternatives for the Company’s underappreciated digital business.”
    A spin-off of Caesars Digital makes sense for several reasons. In 2024, Caesars Digital generated $1.16 billion in revenue, accounting for 10.3% of the company’s total revenue. This represented a 19.5% growth from the year prior and 112.2% growth since 2022. Consensus estimates suggest that Digital can continue to grow in mid-double-digits. Digital’s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and restructuring or rent costs (EBITDAR) has also surged 207.9% from 2023 to 2024, with projections of another 160.9% increase in 2025. In contrast, the company’s brick-and-mortar segments (Las Vegas and Regional), have remained relatively stagnant, with revenue declining 2.34% from 2023 and 1.78% from 2022. EBITDAR has also declined by 6.56% and 5.87% over the same periods, respectively, and consensus estimates predict a similar trend going forward. Clearly, these are two businesses at vastly different points in their growth cycles, making it difficult for the market to fairly evaluate them as a single entity. Currently Caesars trades at 8.43-times EBITDA, whereas digital peers of Caesars Digital trade at 15 times to 25 times. Applying that multiple range to Digital’s $305 million of 2025E adjusted EBITDA would render an entity with a value of approximately $4.6 billion to $7.6 billion. As Digital only represents 3% of the company’s current EBITDA, this separation would unlock a ton of value, as Digital’s standalone valuation would represent 15% to 25% of the company’s total current enterprise value – significantly higher than what its implied valuation is right now within Caesars. This separation would also allow investors the option to invest in a consistent legacy casino business or a riskier high-growth digital business. This does not have to be a straight sale or spinoff, either. Icahn is one of the most creative investors ever and his two nominees will likely work to figure out what the best structure is for shareholders. For example, the company could retain a piece of the digital business or enter into an agreement with the new entity to run the business.
    Carl Icahn knows a ton about the casino business. He has had a tremendous history of creating value at casinos. In 1998, Icahn acquired the Stratosphere casino operations, fixed it up, grew it and sold it for more than $1 billion about a decade later. Icahn acquired an interest in Tropicana in 2008 when it was bankrupt, brought in new leadership and restructured it and sold it in April 2018 for $1.85 billion. And of course, he disclosed a stake in Caesars in 2019, replaced departing CEO Mark Frissora and orchestrated the Eldorado merger. So, there is no other activist more qualified to create value at a company like Caesars. The stealth nature and structure of the agreement in addition to the comments made by Caesars and Icahn strongly indicate that this is a very amicable arrangement, and that Icahn is confident in management’s ability. While CEOs do not generally like to spin off assets, all indications are that Caesars’ management is receptive to this strategy.
    Icahn is not a micro-manager and trusts his people and management to execute effectively. This has been an area rife for activism with Icahn protege Keith Meister on the board of MGM, two activists in Penn Entertainment and two more activists in Entain with Eminence founder Ricky Sandler on the board. This industry is at an inflection point with the onset of interactive gaming. The companies that navigate this better – likely through acquisitions and alliances, and without significantly weakening their balance sheets – will be the winners. I am not sure you can have a better ally in that type of initiative than Carl Icahn.
    Ken Squire is the founder and president of 13D Monitor, an institutional research service on shareholder activism, and the founder and portfolio manager of the 13D Activist Fund, a mutual fund that invests in a portfolio of activist 13D investments. More

  • in

    Michigan nuclear plant shows the challenges the U.S. will face in safely restarting old reactors

    The shuttered Palisades nuclear plant in Michigan aims to become the first reactor in U.S. history to restart operations after permanently closing.
    The restart project at Palisades would set a precedent as other closed nuclear plants in the U.S. are looking to reopen.
    But inspections found Palisades’ steam generator tubes need significant repairs. The tubes are crucial components that protect the public from a radiological release.

    The Palisades nuclear power plant in Covert, Michigan, Feb. 24, 2025.
    Spencer Kimball | CNBC

    COVERT, Mich. — A nuclear power plant on the shores of Lake Michigan is aiming to make history this fall by becoming the first reactor in the U.S. to restart operations after shutting down to be eventually dismantled.
    The effort to restart the Palisades plant near South Haven, which shut down three years ago, is a precedent-setting event that could pave a path for other shuttered reactors to come back online.

    But Palisades needs major repairs to restart safely, highlighting the challenges the industry will face in bringing aging plants back to life.
    Palisades began commercial operations in 1971 during the early wave of reactor construction in the U.S. The plant permanently ceased operations in 2022, one of a dozen reactors to close in recent years as nuclear energy has struggled to compete against cheaper natural gas and renewables.
    The owner of the plant, Holtec International, has said it hopes to restart Palisades this fall, subject to approval by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The restart project is backed by a $1.5 billion loan guarantee from the Department of Energy, $1.3 billion from the Department of Agriculture, and $300 million in grants from the state of Michigan.
    The Energy Department on Monday approved the release of nearly $57 million from the loan, a sign that the Trump administration supports the project amid the turmoil and uncertainty in Washington over federal funding for projects started under the Biden administration.
    But Holtec is facing major repairs to Palisades’ aging steam generators that could delay a schedule the NRC has called demanding. Holtec has disclosed to regulators that its inspections have found damaged tubes in the plant’s two generators, which were installed in 1990.

    Inside the control room at the Palisades nuclear power plant in Covert, Michigan, Feb. 24, 2025.
    Spencer Kimball | CNBC

    Those tubes are crucial components that protect public health. If a tube ruptures at a nuclear plant, there is a risk that radioactive material will be released into the environment, according to the NRC. Plant owners are required to demonstrate to the NRC that if a tube does fail, any radiological release beyond the plant’s perimeter would remain below what the regulator describes as its “conservative limits.”
    “The NRC is scared to death of steam generator tube ruptures. It’s a very real accident. It’s not a hypothetical,” said Alan Blind, who served as engineering director at Palisades from 2006 to 2013 under previous plant owner Entergy.  Blind, who is now retired, said he supports nuclear power but is concerned about the condition of the Palisades plant based on decades of experience in the industry. 
    Palisades is currently in a safe condition, NRC spokesperson Scott Burnell said, as the steam generators are not in use because the plant is shut down and defueled.
    Holtec President Kelly Trice told CNBC the company has done a “complete characterization” of the generators and “they are fully repairable.” The company has asked the NRC to complete its review of the repair plan by Aug. 15, but federal regulators are skeptical of the company’s timetable.
    NRC Branch Chief Steve Bloom warned Holtec during a Jan. 14 public meeting that the work required to review the plan will “add to a schedule that is already very aggressive.” Eric Reichelt, a senior materials engineer at the NRC, called the schedule “very demanding,” telling Holtec at the meeting that only a few people are available at the regulatory body to do the necessary review work.

    Steam generator repairs

    In nuclear plants such as Palisades, water heated by the reactor passes through tubes in the generators, causing water outside the tubes to boil into steam that drives the turbines to produce electricity for the grid.
    The radioactive water that circulates through the reactor and the clean water that boils in the generators do not come into contact with each other. If a tube ruptures, however, the contaminated water mixes with the clean water and radioactive material could be released into the environment through valves that discharge steam, according to the NRC.
    Holtec’s inspections found more than 1,400 indications of corrosion cracking across more than 1,000 steam generator tubes at Palisades, according to a company filing with the NRC in October 2024. The tubes have not failed, Holtec CEO Krishna Singh told CNBC in February. Several had corrosion cracking with more than 70% penetration, according to the filing.
    Due to the plant’s age, Palisades steam generator tubes are made of an alloy that the industry has since learned is prone to corrosion cracking, according to NRC. Holtec said it is using a technique to repair the tubes called “sleeving” in which a higher quality alloy is inserted and expanded to seal the damage.

    Inside the control room at the Palisades nuclear power plant in Covert, Michigan, Feb. 24, 2025.
    Spencer Kimball | CNBC

    “The techniques of repair which we’re using, which is called sleeving, has been done in about 10 plants across the world and in some plants is done every outage, so this is not new, exotic technology,” Trice said. “It is a common repair technique, and we expect it to be done on time and on schedule.”
    Holtec’s repair plan is scheduled to start this summer following inspection and testing, spokesperson Nick Culp told CNBC. Holtec can go ahead with the tube repairs on its schedule, but the company does so at its own risk as the NRC will decide whether the repairs meet requirements in the end, Burnell said.
    But during the Jan. 14 meeting, NRC branch chief Bloom pushed back on Holtec’s statements that the company’s repair plan is following industry precedent.
    “Even though you’re quote, unquote, following a precedent, it’s not exactly, because it’s a different material, different type of sleeving,” Bloom said at the January meeting. The sleeve design that Holtec is proposing for the repairs has not been installed in steam generators before, though it has been used in other heat exchangers at nuclear plants, according to a company filing.
    The sleeves are made of an alloy that has not shown signs of cracking in U.S. or international plants, according to the filing. The component has a service life of no more than 10 years, the filing said. Culp said testing and analysis of the sleeves “support the expectation of longer-term performance.”
    The issues with the tubes raise the question of whether the aging steam generators should be replaced, an expensive project that Palisades’ previous owners knew would be necessary at some point but never tackled.

    Inside the control room at the Palisades nuclear power plant in Covert, Michigan, Feb. 24, 2025.
    Spencer Kimball | CNBC

    Consumers Energy, for example, sold the Palisades to Entergy in 2007 for $380 million in part due to “significant capital expenditures that are required for the plant,” including the replacement of the steam generators, according to a filing with the Michigan Public Service Commission.
    Consumers Energy assumed that the generators needed to be replaced in 2016, according to the filing. Entergy, however, did not replace them after purchasing Palisades. The utility found that purchasing new generators would make the plant economically unfeasible, said Blind, who was engineering director at Palisades during that time.
    “They felt that with their expertise that they could prolong the remaining life, which is exactly what they did up until they shut it down,” Blind said.
    Entergy closed Palisades in May 2022 and sold the plant to Holtec to take over its dismantling. But Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in a letter to the Department of Energy pushed to keep Palisades open, citing the jobs supported by the plant and the need for reliable, carbon-free power. Backed by the governor’s office, Holtec first applied for federal support to restart Palisades two months after it closed.

    Indian Point leak

    A steam generator tube rupture at the Indian Point nuclear plant — located 24 miles north of New York City in Westchester County, New York — demonstrates the potential risks such incidents pose to public health and the finances of utility companies.
    On Feb. 15, 2000, operators at Indian Point Unit 2 received a notification that a steam generator tube had failed, according to the NRC’s report on the incident. Consolidated Edison issued an alert and shut the plant down, the regulator said. It would stay closed for 11 months while the cause of the rupture was investigated and the condition of the four steam generators was analyzed.
    The rupture resulted in “a minor radiological release to the environment that was well within regulatory limits,” according to an NRC task force report. The incident “did not impact the public health and safety,” according to the report. Still, the NRC slapped Con Edison with a red citation, the most serious violation, after determining the leak was of “high safety significance.”
    The leak was contained and there was no evacuation of neighboring communities, but authorities in Westchester County at the time were deeply worried about the risk to the public, said Blind, who was Con Edison’s vice president of nuclear power at Indian Point during the incident.

    Inside the Palisades nuclear power plant in Covert, Michigan, Feb. 24, 2025.
    Spencer Kimball | CNBC

    “We had contained all of the radioactive water, but they were so scared that they were very close to closing all the schools,” said Blind. “They weren’t going to let the children come to school in the morning until they saw how this all played out. It’s all very serious.”
    The leak proved costly for Con Edison. The utility replaced the four steam generators at an estimated cost of up to $150 million, according to company filings from the time. The bill would have been higher had Con Edison not had replacement steam generators already on hand. The utility had owned replacement generators since 1988 but had not installed them. Con Edison also paid more than $130 million in charges associated with the 11-month outage at the plant.
    Blind said Con Edison decided to replace the steam generators at Indian Point to reduce the risk that there would be another tube rupture when the plant restarted.
    “We were a publicly traded company,” Blind said. “And it came down from the board, it said we can’t live with this uncertainty.”
    The utility sold Indian Point Units 1 and 2 to Entergy for $502 million in 2001 under a deal that also included gas turbine assets. The sale was under consideration before the tube rupture. Con Edison estimated an after-tax loss of $170 million from the Indian Point sale, according to filings from the time.
    Blind said the stakes of the planned Palisades restart are high for the entire nuclear industry. Demand for nuclear power is growing again in the U.S. as states, utilities and the tech sector seek more reliable, carbon-free power. The renewed interest has been referred to as a “nuclear renaissance” after years of reactor shutdowns in the U.S.
    Constellation Energy, for example, is planning to restart its Three Mile Island plant in 2028 subject to NRC approval. Constellation has said the steam generators at the plant have undergone inspection and maintenance and are in good condition. NextEra Energy announced in July 2024 that it is evaluating whether restarting its Duane Arnold plant in Iowa is feasible.
    An incident at Palisades “would be devastating for the entire industry,” Blind said. “There would be calls for rethinking this renaissance idea,” he said.
    Holtec’s Culp said the sleeves used to repair the steam generators at Palisades will be continuously monitored, inspected and subject to regulatory oversight while they are in service. The plant employs multiple layers of defense “to protect our workforce, community, and environment,” he said.
    NRC inspectors will observe Holtec’s repair activities as they are implemented and will ensure the steam generators meet all the requirements for safe operation, Burnell said. “This includes making sure that the public and the environment are protected from radiological concerns,” the NRC spokesman said.

    Catch up on the latest energy news: More

  • in

    Social Security chief reverses stance, says he won’t shut agency because judge barred DOGE from records

    Social Security Administration acting commissioner Lee Dudek reversed his stance late Friday after telling multiple media outlets a court order may force him to halt the agency’s operations.
    “I am not shutting down the agency,” Dudek said in a written statement, adding that he had received clarifying guidance from the court.
    Earlier in the day, Dudek had said an order barring the agency from giving DOGE team members access to personal data may require him to cut off all employees’ data access.

    A sign for the U.S. Social Security Administration is seen outside its headquarters in Woodlawn, Md., on Thursday, March 20, 2025. 
    Tom Williams | Cq-roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images

    The Social Security Administration’s acting commissioner reversed his stance late Friday after telling multiple news outlets that a new court ruling may require him to shut down the agency’s operations.
    Acting Commissioner Lee Dudek said in a written statement that the court “issued clarifying guidance” about its earlier temporary restraining order barring members of the Trump administration’s DOGE team from having access to private data.

    “Therefore, I am not shutting down the agency,” he said. “SSA employees and their work will continue under the TRO.”
    On Thursday, a federal judge temporarily blocked the cost-cutting initiative known as the Department of Government Efficiency from accessing individuals’ personal data at the Social Security Administration. Dudek said in interviews afterward that the ruling may require him to cut off access to all the agency’s employees.
    “Everything in this agency is [personally identifiable information],” Dudek told The Washington Post on Friday. “Unless I get clarification, I’ll just start to shut it down. I don’t have much of a choice here.”
    In her ruling, judge Ellen Lipton Hollander barred Social Security Administration employees including Dudek from granting the DOGE team access to information that can be used to identify individuals. DOGE is not a Cabinet department, and its leader, Tesla CEO Elon Musk, is considered a special government employee.
    Hollander also ordered DOGE team members to delete all non-anonymized personally identifiable information they have accessed “directly or indirectly” since Jan. 20.

    More from Personal Finance:Judge bars Musk’s DOGE team from Social Security recordsStudent loans to be handled by the Small Business AdministrationThe Feds hold interest rates steady. What that means for your money
    Following the ruling, Dudek said the court order is so broad that it could apply to any Social Security employee, Bloomberg reported Thursday.
    “My anti-fraud team would be DOGE affiliates. My IT staff would be DOGE affiliates,” Dudek told Bloomberg. “As it stands, I will follow it exactly and terminate access by all SSA employees to our IT systems.”
    However, in a March 18 letter to Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., Dudek said there are only 11 DOGE-affiliated individuals at the Social Security Administration.
    Warren, in a written statement, said, “The Trump administration is threatening to shut down all of Social Security simply because a judge ruled to block 11 DOGE employees from sticking their fingers in taxpayers’ private information.”
    Dudek also said he would ask the judge to immediately clarify the order, the news outlet reported.
    “We have received the court order and we will comply,” a Social Security spokesperson said in an email statement to CNBC on Friday. The agency did not respond directly to questions from CNBC on Dudek’s comments, or make Dudek available for an interview.

    Advocacy groups slam Social Security leadership

    The Social Security Administration sends millions of benefit checks per month to retirement and disability program beneficiaries, both through Social Security and Supplemental Security Income.
    Dudek’s comments, and the implications that the court actions could interfere with the timely delivery of benefits, prompted a wave of responses from advocacy groups.
    “For almost 90 years, Social Security has never missed a paycheck — but 60 days into this administration, Social Security is now on the brink,” Lee Saunders, president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, said in a statement in response to Dudek’s comments. Hollander’s ruling was in a lawsuit that a coalition of unions and retirees, including AFSCME, a trade union, brought against the Social Security Administration.
    Dudek “has proven again that he is in way over his head,” said Saunders. He said that under Dudek’s leadership the agency has compromised Americans’ security, shut down certain agency services and planned layoffs.
    In a separate statement, Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, said Dudek’s leadership has been the “darkest in Social Security’s nearly 90 year history.”
    “He has sown chaos and destruction,” Altman said.

    In a memo sent to Social Security staff members Tuesday that was obtained by NBC News, Dudek apologized for having made mistakes and promised to learn from them.
    Dudek assumed the role of acting commissioner in February when then acting commissioner Michelle King stepped down due to DOGE privacy concerns. Dudek, a long-time Social Security employee, reportedly publicly disclosed he had been placed on administrative leave for cooperating with DOGE.
    Trump has nominated Frank Bisignano, CEO of payments technology company Fiserv, to serve as commissioner. Bisignano’s Senate confirmation hearing is scheduled for Tuesday.

    Democrats, Republicans at odds over Social Security

    Tensions surrounding changes at the Social Security Administration have prompted a war of words between Democrats and Republicans in Congress.
    House Ways and Means Committee ranking member Richard Neal, D-Mass., on March 19 put out a statement that called the current situation at the Social Security Administration a “five-alarm fire.” New changes that may limit customer service and restrict benefit access are “not just burdensome for our nation’s seniors and people with disabilities — they are back-door benefit cuts,” Neal wrote.

    Meanwhile, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, R-Mo., in a March 12 statement said Democrats are “scaremongering to score political points,” while “the facts are not on their side.”
    “President Trump did not touch Social Security benefits during his first term,” Smith said. “House Republicans and President Trump remain committed to protecting and preserving the retirement benefits seniors count on.” More

  • in

    Nvidia’s CEO sought to help the quantum companies and ended up causing another sell-off in the stocks

    On Thursday, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang clarified comments from earlier this year that rattled investors in quantum computing stocks during the company’s first-ever “Quantum Day.”
    While Huang was aiming to soothe investors rattled by his prior statement, Thursday’s event did not appear to help the case for quantum stocks.

    Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang interviews executives from quantum computing firms at Nvidia’s annual developer conference in San Jose, California, on March 20, 2025.
    Stephen Nellis | Reuters

    Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang spoke at the chipmaker’s annual conference on Thursday, aiming to walk back past comments on the decadeslong timeline needed for useful quantum computers.
    But his latest foray into the quantum world appeared to have the opposite effect. Despite Huang’s public change of tune, several key stocks in the sector tumbled on Thursday, with D-Wave tanking 18% and the Quantum Defiance ETF (QTUM) dropping 2%.

    At Nvidia’s first-ever “Quantum Day” event on Thursday, Huang said his January statements on quantum needing at least 15 years to become useful technology did not land as he intended. Huang also said he was surprised to see his commentary move public markets as it did in January.
    “This is the first event in history where a company CEO invites all of the guests to explain why he was wrong,” Huang said Thursday.
    In a show of support for the industry, Huang was joined by executives from several major quantum firms for a session, which is part of the megacap tech titan’s annual gathering called GTC happening this week. Nvidia’s announcement that it was hosting this “Quantum Day” had originally helped spark a recovery rally for the sector in January.
    Huang said in January that 15 years was “on the early side” when laying out when to expect quantum computing technology would be deemed useful, prompting a sell-off in the sector. An expectation of 20 years is considered more reasonable, the CEO had said.
    While Huang was aiming to soothe investors rattled by those prior comments, Thursday’s event did not appear to help the case for quantum stocks.

    Even companies that accepted invitations to have executives join Huang on stage saw their shares fall. In addition to D-Wave’s plunge, Rigetti Computing and IonQ each dropped more than 9% on Thursday.

    Stock chart icon

    D-Wave, Rigetti and IonQ, 1-day

    Needham analyst Quinn Bolton told clients that Huang’s insinuation about quantum’s branding was “one of the most contested portions” of the event. Tied to this, Bolton said, was the CEO’s belief that quantum computing should be marketed as a special tool that works alongside classical systems as opposed to a replacement.
    “Jensen raised the idea that quantum computing might be poorly positioned, as calling a quantum system a computer sets unrealistic expectations,” Bolton said.
    Nvidia has benefited from the rise of quantum, as research on this type of computer is done through simulators on powerful devices like what the company sells. The company is working on making technology to integrate graphics processing units, known in short as GPUs, with chips for quantum computing.
    This week, Nvidia announced that it would build a research center in Boston where quantum companies can work with researchers at Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    Huang offered positive statements around the possible effect of quantum if it can be fully realized. But investors still appear skeptical on the sector, with the Quantum Defiance ETF down more than 4% this year.
    “Of course, quantum computing has the potential and all of our hopes that it will deliver extraordinary impact,” Huang said during Thursday’s event. “But the technology is insanely complicated.”
    — CNBC’s Kif Leswing contributed to this report.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Where this Morningstar top-rated female fund manager is putting money to work

    Janet Rilling heads the plus fixed -income team at Allspring Global Investments.
    Courtesy: Allspring Global Investments

    Janet Rilling’s path to success started with her first investment as a teenager.
    Today the Wisconsin native, a senior portfolio manager and head of the plus fixed income team at Allspring Global Investments, is among the top female fund managers named at Morningstar.

    Rilling’s interest in finance was spurred by her father.
    “He did personal investing and around the dinner table, we’d have conversations,” Rilling said.
    She opened her first certificate of deposit when she was 16 and bought her first mutual fund in an individual retirement account while at college.
    Rilling now has 30 years of fixed-income experience under her belt, to go along with a masters in finance from the University of Wisconsin and CPA and CFA designations. Working out of Allspring’s Milwaukee office, Rilling stands out not just because of what Morningstar calls her “impressive career,” but because she is still in the minority when it comes to gender. Only 18% of portfolio managers and 26% of analysts are filled by women, a recent Morningstar survey found.
    “I find this industry to be so compelling to be a part of, and I think women can bring a lot to it and also get a lot out of it,” Rilling said. “So it has been surprising to me that during my time in this industry, those numbers haven’t moved a lot.”

    Putting her investment strategy to work
    These days, she is finding plenty of opportunities in fixed income, noting that yields are providing attractive payouts.
    “The beauty of that income is it’s a cushion. So in the event that rates do move up from here, you do have some income that can help offset that,” she said. “That’s what gives us more confidence to be more constructive on fixed income in this environment.”
    As head of the plus fixed income team, Rilling manages 23 investment professionals. She is also a manager of the Allspring Core Plus Bond fund, which gets four stars at Morningstar. The fund has a 4.29% 30-day SEC yield and 0.81% gross expense ratio.
    It is in the top quartile in its category for trailing 5-, 10- and 15-year returns, according to Morningstar. However, its performance so far this year lands it in the third quartile.

    Stock chart icon

    Allspring Core Plus Bond Fund (A shares)

    “The team plies a sound and well-structured approach that uses qualitative views to adjust quantitative outputs,” Morningstar senior analyst Mike Mulach wrote in May.
    The fund tilts towards high-quality income. Rilling said the process is very collaborative, with individuals bringing their unique views to the table. Her focus is on the investment-grade portion of the portfolio.
    “As a group, we talk across all the sectors and, as a team, we set our targets for allocating to the sectors,” she said.
    The “core” part of the fund makes up at least 65% of the portfolio and is allocated to sectors within the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. That includes Treasurys, agency mortgage-backed securities, investment-grade corporate bonds and structured products.

    Up to 35% is in the “plus” part of the fund. That includes U.S. high yield, emerging market debt and European credit.
    “We think about casting a wide net there,” Rilling said. “We want to use a lot of the different global fixed-income sectors within the plus piece, because we think that leads to a more diversified source of alpha and can help us with having a more consistent return profile.”
    These days, the “plus” allocations make up just about 12% of the fund because valuations look rich, she said.
    “No one sector screens as especially cheap, but we think the incremental yield across them is worth having an allocation,” she said.
    Some 3.3% is in U.S. high-yield bonds and 2.3% is in emerging markets. About 2% is in European investment-grade credit and 2.6% in European high-yield.
    The firm also launched an exchange-traded fund version of the strategy, Allspring Core Plus ETF (APLU), in December. It has a 4.74% 30-day SEC yield and a 0.30% expense ratio.
    Where she sees opportunity
    These days, Rilling favors a number of different structured products, including agency mortgage-backed securities .
    “If you look at valuations over the last cycle, they’re a little more middle of the range compared to investment grade credit, which is near the tightest it’s been during this last historical period,” she said. “We think there are some supply/demand dynamics that also offer support to the asset class as we move through 2025.”
    She also likes asset-backed securities, including some “plain vanilla” exposures like credit-card-backed and auto deals. In addition, “esoteric” — or less standard — holdings can also be attractive right now, she said.
    “They are things like data centers, loans to franchisees … just a range of exposures that are consumer-related or business-related,” Rilling said. “We like the fundamentals of that part of the market, and we think compensation is good.”
    The fund also has a modest allocation to commercial mortgage-backed securities. While they may be controversial to some because of issues in the office market, the sector has more to offer, such as retail and hospitality properties, she said.
    “We’ve been opportunistic where we think things have been the baby thrown out with the bathwater,” Rilling said. “We have picked up some individual securities that we think offer better value than what we’re seeing in other parts of the fixed income market.”

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Trump says student loans will be handled by Small Business Administration

    President Donald Trump said Friday that the Small Business Administration, instead of the Education Department, would handle the country’s student loans.

    U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth (not pictured) in the Oval Office at the White House, in Washington, D.C., U.S., March 21, 2025. 
    Carlos Barria | Reuters

    President Donald Trump said Friday that the Small Business Administration, instead of the U.S. Department of Education, would handle the country’s federal student loan portfolio.
    “We have a portfolio that is very large, lots of loans, tens of thousands of loans, pretty complicated deal,” Trump said, speaking to reporters in the Oval Office. “That’s coming out of the Department of Education immediately.”

    “They’re all set for it,” the president said of the SBA. “They’re waiting for it.”
    Outstanding federal education debt exceeds $1.6 trillion, with more than 40 million Americans holding student loans.
    Trump’s announcement comes a day after he signed an executive order aimed at dismantling the Education Department. Only Congress can unilaterally eliminate the agency.
    More from Personal Finance:Americans lost $5.7 billion to investment fraud in 2024Don’t hide cash at home — what to do insteadHow to manage your student loan payments after a layoff
    Consumer advocates are worried that the mass transfer of accounts could trigger errors, or compromise borrowers’ privacy. They also raised concerns about how a change in agency might affect protections and programs such as Public Service Loan Forgiveness.

    Trump said earlier this month that his administration was looking to task any of the Treasury Department, Commerce Department or the Small Business Administration with federal student loan management.
    Experts said the most logical agency would have been the Treasury Department, since it already plays a role in collecting past-due debts from Americans through the Treasury Offset Program.
    Meanwhile, “neither Commerce nor SBA has any relevant experience,” higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz told CNBC this month.
    One important thing for borrowers keep in mind: The terms and conditions of your federal student loans cannot change even if the agency overseeing them does, experts say. Your rights were guaranteed when you signed the master promissory note at the time your loans were originated.

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Judge bars Musk’s DOGE team from Social Security records in scathing ruling

    A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order barring Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency team from getting access to personally identifiable information from the Social Security Administration.
    Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander accused DOGE of launching a “fishing expedition” at the Social Security agency and failing to provide any reason why it needed to access vast swaths of Americans’ personal and private data.
    “The defense does not appear to share a privacy concern for the millions of Americans whose SSA records were made available to the DOGE affiliates, without their consent,” the judge wrote.

    A sign in front of the entrance of the Security Administration’s main campus on March 19, 2025 in Woodlawn, Maryland. 
    Kayla Bartkowski | Getty Images

    A federal judge Thursday issued a temporary restraining order barring Elon Musk’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency team from having access to personally identifiable information from the Social Security Administration.
    Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander in a scathing ruling accused DOGE of launching a “fishing expedition” at the Social Security agency and failing to provide any reason why it needed to access vast swaths of Americans’ personal and private data.

    Hollander said the “defendants, with so called experts on the DOGE Team” never identify or articulate a reason why DOGE needs “unlimited access to SSA’s entire record systems, thereby exposing personal, confidential, sensitive, and private information that millions of Americans entrusted to their government.”
    The order in U.S. District Court in Baltimore blocks the Social Security Administration, acting Commissioner Leland Dudek and Chief Information Officer Michael Russo, as well as all related agents and employees working with them, from granting access to any system containing personally identifiable information.
    More from Personal Finance:Americans lost $5.7 billion to investment fraud in 2024Don’t hide cash at home — what to do insteadHow to manage your student loan payments after a layoff
    Per the lawsuit, personally identifiable information is defined as information that can be used to identify an individual, either on its own or when combined with other information. That includes Social Security numbers, medical provider information, medical and mental health treatment records, employer and employee payment records, employee earnings, addresses, bank records and tax information.
    The judge also ordered the DOGE team members and affiliates to delete all non-anonymized personally identifiable information in their possession or control that they have accessed “directly or indirectly” since Jan. 20.

    The lawsuit was brought by a coalition of unions and retirees including the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees; the Alliance for Retired Americans and the American Federation of Teachers.
    In a statement, White House principal deputy press secretary Harrison Fields slammed Hollander as a “radical leftist” and accused her of “abusing the system to try and sabotage” Trump’s agenda.
    “The President will continue to seek all legal remedies available to ensure the will of the American people goes into effect,” Fields said.
    “We will work to comply with the court order,” a Social Security spokesperson told CNBC via email. 

    Judge: DOGE method ‘hitting a fly with a sledgehammer’

    Hollander, noting the affiliates of DOGE have kept their identities hidden, wrote, “ironically, the identity of these DOGE affiliates has been concealed because defendants are concerned that the disclosure of even their names would expose them to harassment and thus invade their privacy.”
    “The defense does not appear to share a privacy concern for the millions of Americans whose SSA records were made available to the DOGE affiliates, without their consent,” the judge wrote.
    The judge also said that the administration has not “attempted to explain why a more tailored, measured, titrated approach is not suitable to the task.”
    “Instead, the government simply repeats its incantation of a need to modernize the system and uncover fraud,” Hollander wrote. “Its method of doing so is tantamount to hitting a fly with a sledgehammer.”
    The judge pointed to the public reaction to the disclosure of the Social Security numbers of more than 400 former congressional staffers and other individuals with the release of unredacted files associated with the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. That supports the expectation of privacy with regard to that personal data, she wrote.

    The plaintiffs are “likely” to succeed in their arguments that DOGE’s actions are arbitrary and violate the Privacy Act and Administrative Procedure Act, the judge said.
    “We are grateful that the court took strong action to protect every American’s personal data,” Richard Fiesta, executive director of the Alliance for Retired Americans, a national grassroots advocacy organization, said in an emailed statement. “Seniors must be able to trust the Social Security Administration will protect their personal information and keep it from falling into the wrong hands.”
    — CNBC’s Dan Mangan and Kevin Breuninger contributed to this report. More