Congressional Republicans are raising alarms over a $400 weekly boost to unemployment benefits proposed by Democrats and President Joe Biden. However, some experts signal those warning bells may be premature.
GOP members of the House Budget Committee said Monday that extra jobless benefits offer an incentive for workers to stay home rather than find a job.
That’s because many Americans would earn more from unemployment benefits than they did at work, said Rep. Jason Smith, R-Mo., ranking member of the Budget Committee.
More from Personal Finance:
$15 minimum wage could boost Social Security benefits
These taxpayers will get until June 15 to file their 2020 returns
Tax season is in full swing. So are the tax scams
It’s the same argument Republican lawmakers used against a prior $600-a-week enhancement to benefits.
“This is the wrong plan for America’s working class,” Smith said during a hearing on a $1.9 trillion Covid relief bill that Democrats are aiming to pass by mid-March, before unemployment benefits lapse for millions of people.
The measure, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, would pay unemployed workers an extra $400 a week through Aug. 29.
Those additional relief payments would raise federal spending by about $163 billion through 2022, according to a cost estimate the Congressional Budget Office issued last week.
Former President Donald Trump had also offered a $400-a-week Lost Wages Assistance subsidy for unemployed workers last August. (Many workers received $300 a week instead due to cost-sharing rules.)
In total, spending would rise $246 billion due to extra jobless aid in the American Rescue Plan, including benefit extensions for the self-employed, the agency projected.
Those outlays reduce employment and would lead workers to “sit on the couch at home through August,” said Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., a first-term House member who serves on the budget committee.
The Congressional Budget Office said the extra benefits could potentially increase the unemployment rate and reduce the number of workers in the labor force while they’re in place.
Unfounded fears?
However, evidence suggests fears of this dynamic may be unfounded.
For one, economic studies found that a $600 weekly supplement to unemployment benefits provided by the CARES Act didn’t keep recipients from looking for work. The subsidy was available for four months through July.
Higher benefits generally lead to a job-finding disincentive in a healthy labor market, but that negative effect is less pronounced when then are few available jobs — as was the case early in the pandemic recession.
“There’s no point in actively looking for work if there aren’t any jobs,” said Julia Lane, an economist and professor at New York University. “The notion of a disincentive effect assumes there are jobs available.”
A preliminary analysis conducted by Lane and a group of other economists, who are analyzing state unemployment data for 2020, suggests jobs haven’t returned to a point that’s likely to provoke a work disincentive.
“Right now, [the disincentive] is not empirically evident at scale,” Lane said.
“A whole lot of work has vanished,” she added. “Now, there are jobs, but the jobs are largely for people who work from home or for [front-line] jobs in which they can get [Covid].”
Work in certain industries like hotels and restaurants is still well below pre-pandemic levels, for example. Employment in leisure and hospitality is down almost 4 million, or 23%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Overall, there are nearly 10 million fewer jobs in the U.S. than in February last year. Job growth has also slowed considerably since a rebound from crisis depths in the spring.
A $400 weekly supplement would also replace a smaller share of lost wages for workers relative to the earlier $600 weekly boost, potentially reducing any disincentive.
That earlier CARES Act supplement fully replaced lost paychecks for the average person. By contrast, the $400 enhancement would generally replace 86% of lost wages, according to an analysis of Labor Department data.
Source: Finance - cnbc.com
