More stories

  • in

    Walmart shares are up 312% during outgoing CEO Doug McMillon’s tenure. Here’s how that compares to its rivals

    Walmart’s stock has more than quadrupled since outgoing CEO Doug McMillon began in the role in February 2014.
    Among Walmart’s main retail and grocery rivals, only Amazon and Costco have had better stock returns during that same timeframe.
    Walmart’s share gains are particularly striking compared to Target, which rose about 60% and Albertsons, which rose by only 16%, during the more than a decade period.

    Walmart logo is seen near the store in Austin, United States on Oct. 23, 2025.
    Jakub Porzycki | Nurphoto | Getty Images

    When incoming Walmart CEO John Furner steps into the retailer’s top role, he will try to follow up a period of dramatic share growth that many of Walmart’s rivals have failed to match.
    Walmart’s stock has more than quadrupled since outgoing CEO Doug McMillon began in the role in February 2014. Across nine of the 12 calendar years when was Walmart’s leader, the company posted positive stock returns.

    Among Walmart’s main rivals in the retail and grocery business, only Amazon and Costco have had better stock returns since McMillon took the job. Meanwhile, Walmart’s stock has outperformed those of competitors like Target, Dollar General, Dollar Tree, Kroger and Albertsons.
    McMillon will officially step down at the end of January, but will stay on as executive chairman and advisor. While Furner will face a challenge in replicating the company’s performance under his predecessor, he has been a key catalyst for the company’s success as CEO of its largest sector, Walmart’s U.S. business.
    Along with huge gains on Wall Street, McMillon oversaw a significant period of growth for the nation’s largest grocer, which included sharp sales increases, wage hikes for hourly workers and transformation of the nation’s low-price leader into a major e-commerce player. He also steered the retailer through the tumult of a global pandemic, historic levels of inflation and higher tariffs.
    Sales during McMillon’s first three years in the role were roughly flat — with revenues of $486 billion, $482 billion and $485 billion in the fiscal years ending January 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively.
    Yet those years were followed by steady growth, and those gains have accelerated since 2021, after the Covid pandemic pushed more people to shop online and inflation nudged even wealthier shoppers to seek value. Walmart posted annual revenue of about $681 billion in the fiscal year ended earlier this year, an approximately 40% jump from the company’s annual revenue the first year of McMillon’s tenure.

    This year, Walmart is on track to post annual revenues of over $700 billion for the first time ever. Ironically, however, it is also expected to lose its crown as the largest retailer by annual revenue to its biggest e-commerce rival, Amazon.
    Earlier this year, Amazon leapfrogged Walmart in quarterly sales for the first time. Compared to Walmart, it has a different mix to its business because of its massive cloud computing, advertising and seller services businesses.

    How Walmart’s stock compares to its rivals

    Stock gains by Amazon have outpaced Walmart’s during the years of McMillon’s tenure, with 1,225% share gains by the tech giant compared to a 312% increase by Walmart.
    However, Walmart’s performance on Wall Street has far surpassed big-box retail competitor Target’s across McMillon’s time as CEO. Shares of Target are up about 60% since February 2014, compared to Walmart’s 312% gains.
    During the years of the Covid pandemic, Target’s steep share gains surpassed those of Walmart. Yet the Minneapolis-based cheap chic retailer’s annual sales have been roughly stagnant for about four years and dragged down its stock performance.
    Like Walmart, Target is preparing for a leadership change in February. Last month, Target said Michael Fiddelke, its chief operating officer and former CFO, would succeed longtime CEO Brian Cornell.

    Costco also stands out as a competitor that has posted steeper share gains than Walmart. Shares of the warehouse club retailer, which competes with both Walmart stores and those of its warehouse chain, Sam’s Club, have shot up by more than 700% during the years of McMillon’s tenure.
    Walmart’s supermarket competitors — Kroger and Albertsons, in particular — have lagged behind that. Shares of Kroger, which includes about two dozen grocery chains including Fred Meyer and Ralphs, climbed 265% during McMillon’s tenure. Shares of Albertsons, which includes Safeway, Tom Thumb and other grocery chains, rose by only 16%.
    Albertsons went public in 2020, which gave it less time for stock gains. For about two of those years, from roughly 2022 to 2024, Kroger and Albertsons also sought to merge their two companies into a larger grocer that could better compete with Walmart, Costco, Amazon and others. The deal was ultimately blocked by a U.S. judge, after the Federal Trade Commission sued to stop the merger.

    Dollar stores also fell short of Walmart’s stock performance while McMillon was CEO. Dollar Tree and Dollar General, who compete with Walmart in offering groceries and other items at low prices, posted 104% and 85% share gains, respectively, compared to Walmart’s 312% increase.
    Notably, both dollar store banners’ stocks outperformed Walmart’s during some of those years, yet have been struggling more recently.
    Walmart’s stock was about flat Friday following the retirement announcement, and shares have climbed about 13% this year.
    — CNBC’s Tom Rotunno contributed to this report. More

  • in

    JPMorgan Chase wins fight with fintech firms over fees to access customer data

    JPMorgan Chase, the biggest U.S. bank by assets, has secured deals ensuring it will get paid by the fintech firms responsible for nearly all the data requests made by third-party apps connected to customer bank accounts, CNBC has learned.
    The agreements are with fintech middlemen including Plaid, Yodlee, Morningstar and Akoya, according to JPMorgan spokesman Drew Pusateri.
    After weeks of negotiations between JPMorgan and the middlemen, the bank agreed to lower pricing than it originally proposed, and the fintech middlemen won concessions regarding the servicing of data requests, according to people with knowledge of the talks.

    An exterior view of the new JPMorgan Chase global headquarters building at 270 Park Avenue on Nov. 13, 2025 in New York City.
    Angela Weiss | AFP | Getty Images

    JPMorgan Chase has secured deals ensuring it will get paid by the fintech firms responsible for nearly all the data requests made by third-party apps connected to customer bank accounts, CNBC has learned.
    The bank has signed updated contracts with the fintech middlemen that make up more than 95% of the data pulls on its systems, including Plaid, Yodlee, Morningstar and Akoya, according to JPMorgan spokesman Drew Pusateri.

    “We’ve come to agreements that will make the open banking ecosystem safer and more sustainable and allow customers to continue reliably and securely accessing their favorite financial products,” Pusateri said in a statement. “The free market worked.”
    The milestone is the latest twist in a long-running dispute between traditional banks and the fintech industry over access to customer accounts. For years, middlemen like Plaid paid nothing to tap bank systems when a customer wanted to use a fintech app like Robinhood to draw funds or check balances.
    That dynamic appeared to be enshrined in law in late 2024, when the Biden-era Consumer Financial Protection Bureau finalized what is known as the “open-banking rule” requiring banks to share customer data with other financial firms at no cost.
    But banks sued to prevent the CFPB rule from taking hold and seemed to gain the upper hand in May after the Trump administration asked a federal court to vacate the rule.
    Soon after, JPMorgan — the largest U.S. bank by assets, deposits and branches — reportedly told the middlemen that it would start charging what amounts to hundreds of millions of dollars for access to its customer data.

    In response, fintech, crypto and venture capital executives argued that the bank was engaging in “anti-competitive, rent-seeking behavior” that would hurt innovation and consumers’ ability to use popular apps.
    After weeks of negotiations between JPMorgan and the middlemen, the bank agreed to lower pricing than it originally proposed, and the fintech middlemen won concessions regarding the servicing of data requests, according to people with knowledge of the talks.
    Fintech firms preferred the certainty of locking in data-sharing rates because it is unclear whether the current CFPB, which is in the process of revising the open-banking rule, will favor banks or fintech companies, according to a venture capital investor who asked for anonymity to discuss his portfolio companies.
    The bank and the fintech firms declined to disclose details about their contracts, including how much the middlemen agreed to pay and how long the deals are in force.

    Wider impact

    The deals mark a shift in the power dynamic between banks, middlemen and the fintech apps that are increasingly threatening incumbents. More banks are likely to begin charging fintech firms for access to their systems, according to industry observers.  
    “JPMorgan tends to be a trendsetter. They’re sort of the leader of the pack, so it’s fair to expect that the rest of the major banks will follow,” said Brian Shearer, director of competition and regulatory policy at the Vanderbilt Policy Accelerator.
    Shearer, who worked at the CFPB under former director Rohit Chopra, said he’s worried that the development would create a barrier of entry to nascent startups and ultimately result in higher costs for consumers.

    Source: Robinhood

    Proponents of the 2024 CFPB rule said it gave consumers control over their financial data and encouraged competition and innovation. Banks including JPMorgan said it exposed them to fraud and unfairly saddled them with the rising costs of maintaining systems increasingly tapped by the middlemen and their clients.  
    When Plaid’s deal with JPMorgan was announced in September, the companies issued a dual press release emphasizing the continuity it provided for customers.
    But the industry group that Plaid is a part of has harshly criticized the development, signaling that while JPMorgan has won a decisive battle, the ongoing skirmish may yet play out in courts and in the public.
    “Introducing prohibitive tolls is anti-competitive, anti-innovation, and flies in the face of the plain reading of the law,” Penny Lee, CEO of the Financial Technology Association, told CNBC in response to the JPMorgan milestone.
    “These agreements are not the free market at work, but rather big banks using their market position to capitalize on regulatory uncertainty,” Lee said. “We urge the Trump Administration to uphold the law by maintaining the existing prohibition on data access fees.”

    Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

  • in

    Bitcoin falls below $95,000 amid tech sell-off, bounces off lows on Friday

    Watch Daily: Monday – Friday, 3 PM ET

    Representation of Bitcoin cryptocurrency in this illustration taken Sept. 10, 2025.
    Dado Ruvic | Reuters

    Bitcoin dipped below $95,000 on Friday, pushing the world’s oldest cryptocurrency further into the red and continuing its four-day decline amid a broader artificial intelligence-linked stock pullback.
    The digital asset hit $94,491.22 early Friday, marking its lowest level since May 7. Bitcoin is down nearly 9% week to date, despite briefly reclaiming $107,000 at one point on Tuesday and then rolling over.

    The token was last trading at $97,163.99, or 1% lower on the day, as it regained some of its morning losses.
    The largest crypto by market capitalization attracts many of the same investors that have poured funds into BigTech stocks, linking the two trades. Several of those stocks are falling this week amid a resurfacing of concerns over Silicon Valley giants’ astronomical spending on AI initiatives.
    “There’s less money in the system,” Yat Siu, co-founder of crypto investment and blockchain development firm Animoca Brands told CNBC. That leads to investors “selling certain things off in order to basically deal with other shortfalls or concerns that they might have because there’s a retraction broadly.”

    Stock chart icon

    Bitcoin, 5 days

    The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite fell about 0.6% on Friday, with Meta, Alphabet, Intel, Nvidia and Tesla shedding between roughly 1% and 2%.
    Crypto-linked stocks also fell Friday. Software firm and bitcoin treasury Strategy, formerly Microstrategy, dipped 6%. Trading platforms Gemini Space Station and Bullish’s stocks shed 2%, while Coinbase shares edged down 1%. Digital asset mining firm Bitmine Immersion Technologies was also trading 3% lower.

    Siu noted that this crypto market cycle could differ from past ones, particularly due to the relatively recent influx of institutional capital into digital assets. Institutions don’t typically follow major, long-time bitcoin holders’ almost “religious” belief in the token’s four-year price cycle, he said. That could help bitcoin and other digital assets remain somewhat resilient to recent and soon-to-come headwinds.
    “People think bitcoin is going to go down to $60,000 because of the four year cycle [and the token’s history of] drops and corrections,” Siu said. “But, I don’t believe that because the institutions are not going to follow that particular cycle. They’ll look at [the market downturn] as more as a buying opportunity.” More

  • in

    Hot tech stock ETFs, from AI to quantum computing, have made investors lots of money. Is it time to sell?

    Thematic ETFs tied to trends like artificial intelligence and quantum computing have drawn billions in new money into the market, and the portfolios have been rewarding investors with big gains.
    But ETF Action’s Mike Akins warns that investors need to be mindful of significant risks within these newer portfolio categories, such as similarly branded AI funds, where performance differs by as much as 60% this year.

    Artificial intelligence has become one of the biggest investment stories in the market, helping drive a surge of assets into thematic exchange-traded funds that let retail investors bet on major technology trends. But experts warn that these funds can fall as quickly as they rise. It’s a simple yet important point for investors to keep in mind as tech stocks look more vulnerable, and are leading the market lower in recent days. The Nasdaq has been flirting with a fall below its 50-day moving average for the first time since the April downturn and posted its third-straight losing session on Thursday.
    “We have nearly 400 ETFs at ETF Action that we classify as thematic,” Mike Akins, founding partner at research firm ETF Action, said on CNBC’s “ETF Edge” on Monday. “The top performer is up over 150% year to date … there’s several negative 10%,” he said.

    Investors are drawn to thematic ETFs covering trends from AI to quantum computing, clean energy and defense technology, but they often overlook the risks, including how volatile the portfolios can be. Because thematic ETFs focus on specific sectors or technologies rather than just tracking broad indexes, they can deliver strong gains when a theme is in favor, but momentum may fade.
    ETF Action divides the thematic ETF universe into 12 major categories with many subgroups. Within the disruptive technology category alone, which includes artificial intelligence, flows have been enormous this year. “AI disruptive tech has seen almost $20 billion in flows year to date,” Akins said. Roughly $15 billion of that, he said, has “AI” in the ETF name.
    The surge has helped lift funds like the Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) which has grown to about $7 billion in assets, attracting about $3 billion in net flows since the beginning of the year, according to ETF.com. Its top holdings are Advanced Micro Devices, Alphabet, Samsung, Tesla and Alibaba. Another example from Global X is the Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ), which has around $3 billion in assets under management. Its top holdings are Nvidia, ABB, Fanuc, Intuitive Surgical and Keyence.
    Thematic ETFs do require more research than traditional funds. Case in point: among the 18 ETFs that ETF Action classifies as AI-focused, Akins said there is a performance spread of 60% this year.
    “Every time you see a new ETF come to market, it introduces significant tracking error from just investing in the market,” he said.

    Through the first nine months of 2025, close to 800 ETFs were launched, besting a record for ETF launches set just last year, according to Reuters. Morningstar data indicates there are now more ETFs (over 4,300 U.S. listed ETFs) than individual stocks traded in the U.S.
    Akins described the growth of the ETF market as “overwhelmingly positive” to the investor experience, but added that the growing number of opportunities also implies more risk.
    Some of the themes that led the early wave of thematic investing can lose momentum as stand-alone investment stories even as the trends remain fundamental to the technology sector and market, Akins said. ETFs constructed around the themes of cloud computing and next-generation connectivity, for example, have seen billions of dollars in outflows over the past few years as the companies that were top holdings matured and became part of broad-based stock market indexes already held by investors.
    He stressed that is not a statement about whether cloud computing or connectivity are good or bad investment themes right now, but simply that there is a “lifecycle” to a theme which can lead to less attention and less flows as the theme matures. Ultimately, that can mean themes don’t offer the same high-growth opportunities as they did when they first became popular.
    But Akins added that the timeline for each trend’s momentum is hard to pin down.
    “I think every theme is unique to itself, so some are going to play out longer than others,” Akins said. “That’s part of the story with this space … there’s definitely the idea I’m going to invest in this because I believe it’s going to play out over the next three to seven years.”
    Despite the recent jitters in the stock market and tech stocks specifically, it is important to note that the Nasdaq is less than 5% off an all-time record level and has gained close to 250% since its Covid low point. Akins said thematic investing is worthwhile for investors who understand what they are buying and can tolerate short-term volatility.
    Seizing moments of opportunity in the market can also be key with thematic strategies. “Themes can run very, very quickly, so you should be taking advantage,” Akins said. Significant gains in a short period of time may lead investors to consider taking some profits. “You still want to have an allocation to the theme, but maybe take some off the top,” he added.
    Top 10 disruptive tech ETFs
    First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity (CIBR)Assets: $11.5 billionExpense ratio: 0.59%YTD performance: 20%iShares AI Innovation and Technology (BAI)Assets: $7.6 billionExpense ratio: 0.68%YTD performance: 30.5%Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ)Assets: $7.2 billionExpense ratio: 0.68%YTD performance: 33.6%Roundhill Magnificent Seven (MAGS)Assets: $4 billionExpense ratio: 0.29%YTD performance: 22.2%First Trust Cloud Computing (SKYY)Assets: $3.3 billionExpense ratio: 0.60%YTD performance: 14.4%Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM)Assets: $3.2 billionExpense ratio: 0.40%YTD performance: 37%JPMorgan U.S. Tech Leaders (JTEK)Assets: $3.1 billionExpense ratio: 0.65%YTD performance: 22.8%Amplify Cybersecurity (HACK)Assets: $2.3 billionExpense ratio: 0.60%YTD performance: 15.5%
    ARK Next Generation Internet (ARKW)Assets: $2.2 billionExpense ratio: 0.75%YTD performance: 51.2%Roundhill Generative AI & Technology (CHAT)Assets: $1.1 billionExpense ratio: 0.75%YTD performance: 55%Source: ETFAction.com More

  • in

    Investor Ron Baron says the tech selloff is an opportunity and he’s never selling personal Tesla stake

    Billionaire investor Ron Baron isn’t flinching during the latest tech selloff, and he’s certainly not touching his own Tesla shares, he said.
    The longtime growth investor said he sees the pullback as a chance to spot bargains, even as volatility has rattled the biggest names in tech recently.

    “Not very much,” Baron said Friday on CNBC’s “Squawk Box” when asked what he’s doing amid the drawdown. “Just looking and trying to understand where opportunities are and try to take advantage of them.”
    His conviction is especially intense when it comes to Tesla, one of his signature bets. He recalled selling a third of Baron Funds’ Tesla holding a few years ago due to criticism from his clients and the media about the significant concentration in a single stock. Baron emphasized that his personal position remains entirely intact.
    “We sold 30% for clients. I did not sell personally a single share,” he said.
    Roughly 40% of his personal net worth is invested in the electric-vehicle maker, alongside 25% in SpaceX and about 35% in Baron mutual funds.
    Tesla shares are down 18% from their 52-week high and were on track to open 5% lower on Friday as investors this week rethink the AI-related shares that have led the bull market.

    Baron said he’s already made about $8 billion from Tesla over the years, and he believes he could make five times that over the next decade.
    Baron recounted a promise he made to the board of his mutual funds when he sought approval decades ago to invest in public stocks, a pledge that effectively binds him to Tesla and SpaceX for life.
    “I told the board, ‘If you let me invest a certain amount of money, then I will promise that I won’t sell any of my stock. I will be the last person out of the stock,'” he said. “I will not sell a single share of my shares until my clients sold 100% of their shares. … And I don’t expect to sell in my lifetime Tesla or SpaceX.” More

  • in

    Billionaire families opt for buying sports teams over collecting art and cars

    Sports teams have evolved beyond trophy assets as media rights deals and sponsorships continue to buoy valuations, according to a new survey of billionaire families by J.P. Morgan.
    Twenty percent of family office principals reported owning controlling stakes in sports teams, up from 6% in 2022 and overtaking other luxury assets like art and cars.
    Even ultra-wealthy investors are getting priced out of bidding wars for teams, but there are other ways to get a piece of the action.

    The New Jersey Devils celebrate after Simon Nemec #17 scores the game-winning-goal in double overtime of Game Three of the First Round of the 2025 Stanley Cup Playoffs against the Carolina Hurricanes at Prudential Center on April 25, 2025 in Newark, New Jersey.
    Andrew Maclean | National Hockey League | Getty Images

    A version of this article first appeared in CNBC’s Inside Wealth newsletter with Robert Frank, a weekly guide to the high-net-worth investor and consumer. Sign up to receive future editions, straight to your inbox.
    For the ultra-wealthy, sports teams have evolved from status symbols to mainstream investment assets, according to a new survey by J.P. Morgan Private Bank.

    The bank’s 23 Wall division, which caters to the 0.01%, polled 111 billionaire principals of private family investment firms, representing more than $500 billion in combined wealth, between March and August. Twenty percent of family office principals reported owning controlling stakes in sports teams, up from 6% in 2022.
    Sports assets have also overtaken traditional trophy assets like art and cars, with 34% of principals investing in teams and arenas, compared with 23% for art and 10% for cars, the bank said.

    Get Inside Wealth directly to your inbox

    Andrew Cohen, executive chairman of J.P. Morgan’s global private bank, told Inside Wealth that he expects this trajectory to continue. Sports team valuations continue to rise, buoyed by media rights deals and sponsorships, offering strong returns, he said. The bank values U.S. and European franchises at about $400 billion combined, estimating the total value of sports mergers and acquisitions and investment has increased eightfold over the past five years.
    Cohen added that sports team ownership scratches an entrepreneurial itch in a way that other hobbies cannot. Many principals take on board seats or are active in franchise operations, he said.
    “Unlike art or cars, sports ownership offers principals a platform for active involvement,” he said. “This hands-on approach aligns with the broader trend of families seeking to be ‘active architects’ rather than passive investors.”

    While the growth of the sports industry has drawn investors beyond passionate fans, Cohen said many principals reported motivations beyond financial returns. He cited the desire to bring a family together as a key driver for sports team owners. Female team owners were also likely to say that they backed women’s sports to “help level the playing field,” according to the report.
    As valuations continue to soar, even ultra-high-net-worth individuals are getting priced out of bidding wars for controlling stakes, he said. However, there are ways investors can get a piece of the action at lower price points, according to Cohen, such as joining an ownership group or syndicate to acquire minority stakes, investing in arenas, and making “sports adjacent” investments in data analytics or merchandising.
    Heavy-hitter family offices frequently take multiple tacks when investing in sports. For instance, Blackstone’s David Blitzer, who is the first person to own equity in all five major men’s U.S. sports leagues, has backed at least six sports firms this year, including a padel club chain and a betting app, through his family office Bolt Ventures. More

  • in

    D.R. Horton is tapping a startup’s AI zoning tool to build more homes

    D.R. Horton announced that it will work with a Portland, Oregon-based startup called Prophetic.
    Prophetic has developed an AI-native platform for land acquisition and development analysis.
    The system looks at minimum lot size and minimum or maximum density setbacks, which differ by municipality and zone. It updates those quarterly. 

    D.R. Horton signage stands in front of homes under construction at the Eastridge Woods development in Cottage Grove, Minnesota.
    Daniel Acker | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    A version of this article first appeared in the CNBC Property Play newsletter with Diana Olick. Property Play covers new and evolving opportunities for the real estate investor, from individuals to venture capitalists, private equity funds, family offices, institutional investors and large public companies. Sign up to receive future editions, straight to your inbox.
    D.R. Horton, the nation’s largest homebuilder, is tapping an artificial intelligence tool from Portland, Oregon-based startup Prophetic to build more homes and address the country’s housing shortage.

    Chronic underbuilding since the Great Recession has caused a deficit of roughly 4 million homes, according to analyses from several sources, including Zillow. The supply-demand imbalance has caused prices to rise over 50% from pre-pandemic levels.
    Homebuilders are trying to respond but say that the cost of construction, along with the difficult and costly process for acquiring and developing buildable lots, is making that difficult.
    “One of the largest challenges to providing affordable housing is the identification, acquisition and entitlement of land suitable for development. We are confident the insights provided by Prophetic are going to help us expand homeownership opportunities for hard-working American individuals and families,” said Jason Jones, VP data analytics at D.R. Horton, in a release.
    Prophetic has developed an AI-native platform for land acquisition and development analysis. For any potential parcel of land, Prophetic’s software will pull every single zoning manual from every city and county in a state. It is currently operational in 25 states and expects to be in all 50 by June.
    “It’s an incredibly large, tedious, detail-oriented process to take tens of thousands of these zoning documents and extract the rules, not only efficiently, but correctly,” said Oliver Alexander, founder and CEO of Prophetic.

    Get Property Play directly to your inbox

    CNBC’s Property Play with Diana Olick covers new and evolving opportunities for the real estate investor, delivered weekly to your inbox.
    Subscribe here to get access today.

    Among other things, the system looks at minimum lot size and minimum or maximum density setbacks, which differ by municipality and zone. It updates those quarterly. 
    “Then it tells you where that information came from, which is the key differentiator,” Alexander explained. “When you have that section title and the page that it came from, that builds trust, and then it becomes ultra-efficient, where you can analyze development potential in 30 seconds instead of two to three hours.”
    Alexander said there are a little over 440,000 different ways to describe what you’re allowed to do on a piece of dirt in the states Prophetic has analyzed. Developers need to go through all of that information to figure out if they can build a single- or multifamily housing development on it. 
    The AI’s large language model-based analysis of these documents at scale can answer the questions and then feed that into search AI, which Alexander calls “the major unlock” – search plus the zone AI information together. At the ground level, with this AI, builders can figure out what they can build, where and how much at a much faster pace, making them more competitive with landowners.
    “If you have that much of an edge in your speed to decision, you effectively control your entire market, because before anyone else can decide, you’ve tied it up,” said Alexander. More

  • in

    Fewer burritos, more bargains: Consumers flash holiday warning signs

    From McDonald’s to Savers Value Village, companies are reporting that high-income shoppers are turning into deal hunters.
    Younger consumers are also spending less, hurt by a tough labor market and the resumption of student loan collection.
    But there are exceptions, as Coach’s parent Tapestry, Dutch Bros. and Ralph Lauren manage to win over customers despite the gloomier consumer climate.
    Investors will be watching whether those trends continue as Walmart, Target and other major retailers post earnings in the coming weeks.

    Shoppers walk through Manhattan on Nov. 7, 2025, in New York City.
    Spencer Platt | Getty Images

    High-income consumers are trading down, Gen Z is spending less, and low-income shoppers are still struggling, according to many consumer companies that shared their latest quarterly results in recent weeks.
    Those trends may not bode well for the big-box and mall retailers that have yet to report their earnings. That is, unless the strength of their brands — or high-income consumers who see their products as a good deal — help them transcend the gloomier consumer climate.

    While the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow tracker is projecting 4% U.S. GDP growth in the third quarter, there are cracks showing in the economy. Earlier this month, U.S. consumer sentiment slipped to near record lows, fueled by concerns about higher prices and the federal government shutdown. Plus, private data sources show that the U.S. economy was losing jobs through late October.
    Investors will get a wider snapshot in the coming week. Some of the biggest names in retail, including Walmart, Target, Gap and Home Depot, will report their latest earnings and provide insights into how spending during the critical holiday season is shaping up.
    According to credit card data from equity research firm and bank Truist, sales have softened in recent weeks across many of the retailers that it watches. Sales trends slowed at Walmart, Home Depot and Lowe’s in October after after they saw solid sales in August and September, according to Truist.
    Wall Street has noticed slower spending, too. Michael Baker, a retail analyst for D.A. Davidson, said he now expects weaker holiday spending than he did before as consumers face a challenging mix of higher tariffs, slower job growth and pressure on lower-income households.
    He expects holiday sales to grow in the high 3% range year over year, down from the firm’s previous view that holiday sales growth would accelerate from last year’s 4.3% increase.

    “There’s just a lot of headwinds building for the consumer and a lot of the data we track [at retailers] was just really bad in September and even worse in October,” he said.

    High-income shoppers trade down

    For roughly two years, executives have warned investors that low-income consumers were spending less, dining out less frequently and growing picky about their shopping.
    Now there are more signs that high-income shoppers are watching their budgets, too. That trend could help some of the retailers reporting in the weeks ahead, such as Walmart, Dollar General and Dollar Tree, while hurting others like Target and Best Buy.
    The fast-food industry saw traffic from high-income diners climb by nearly double digits in the third quarter, according to McDonald’s CEO Chris Kempczinski. McDonald’s, often seen as bellwether for the economy, is gaining share with high-income consumers, thanks to deals like its Extra Value Meals, he said on the company’s conference call earlier this month.
    “I think sometimes there’s this idea that value only matters to low-income [consumers],” Kempczinski said. “But value matters to everybody, whether you’re upper income, middle income, lower income, feeling like you’re getting good value for your dollar is important.”

    Sign at the entrance to an Applebee’s in Midtown Manhattan.
    Erik McGregor | Lightrocket | Getty Images

    Fast-food chains aren’t the only ones benefitting from higher-income diners trading down.
    Dine Brands, which owns Applebee’s and IHOP, is seeing a similar trend. With a 2 for $25 promotion at Applebee’s and a $6 value menu at IHOP, the casual-dining chains are pulling customers away from higher-priced options.
    “We’re seeing a greater increase of higher-income guests joining us this year,” Dine CEO John Peyton told CNBC, adding that the jump in traffic from that cohort is offsetting the decline in visits from low-income diners.
    High-income shoppers are also hunting for deals at retailers. Savers Value Village, which runs a chain of thrift stores across the U.S., Canada and Australia, said during its fiscal 2025 third-quarter earnings call that it’s seeing growth in both its “younger and more affluent” customer groups.
    “High household income cohort continues to become a larger portion of our consumer mix. It’s trade down for sure and our younger cohort also continues to grow in numbers,” CEO Mark Walsh said on a call with analysts in October. “We couldn’t ask for a better outcome.”
    Consulting firm Alvarez & Marsal recently conducted a consumer sentiment survey that polled over 2,000 shoppers and found 24% of respondents earning $100,000 or more a year are planning to spend less this holiday season.
    Joanna Rangarajan, a partner and managing director with the firm’s consumer and retail group, said that could partially be because they plan to trade down — or already are.
    “They’re going to pull back spending in a variety of ways. They may do that by buying fewer things, they may switch to less expensive brands, or they may switch to lower cost retailers overall, or it could be a combination of any of those things,” said Rangarajan.

    People shop at a clothing store in Manhattan on Nov. 7, 2025, in New York City.
    Spencer Platt | Getty Images

    While lower-cost brands and retailers could be seeing their core consumers spend less, it might not matter as much if they’re winning over new, higher-income shoppers.
    Walmart, in particular, has spoken about its gains among customers with an annual household income of more than $100,000. That dynamic has boosted the big-box retailer’s business for more than two years, especially as shoppers across all incomes have felt pinched by higher grocery prices. The company has also made some strategic moves to woo wealthier shoppers, such as remodeling stores, launching a new grocery brand and speeding up home deliveries.
    Even the dollar stores have attracted higher-income shoppers.
    Dollar General CEO Todd Vasos said on the company’s earnings call in late August that the retailer saw increased spending among its core customers, who tend to be lower income, despite “worsening sentiment” in the quarter that ended Aug. 1. But he added Dollar General also saw growth among middle- and high-income consumers, which “has been accelerating over the last few quarters.”
    At an investor day in mid-October, Dollar Tree CEO Michael Creedon said higher-income households are the retailer’s “fastest growing cohort.”
    Value-oriented companies, such as Walmart and warehouse clubs, are best positioned to post strong results in the coming weeks as they attract deal-hunting customers across incomes, D.A. Davidson’s Baker said.
    On the other hand, he said Target and Best Buy are in a tougher spot as they lose market share. For example, Baker said Best Buy customers are trading down to big-box stores like Walmart and club players like Costco for lower-priced TVs.

    Younger consumers pull back

    Gen Z and millennials are not spending the way that they used to as they contend with a slowing job market, rising unemployment and the resumption of student loan collection, which the federal government restarted in May.
    The generational trend is particularly bad news for fast-casual restaurants, which skew toward younger diners. Fast-casual favorites like Chipotle Mexican Grill, Cava and Sweetgreen reported that consumers aged 25 to 35 years old aren’t visiting as frequently anymore. All three chains cut their full-year forecast following disappointing third-quarter results.
    At Chipotle, the 25- to 35-year old cohort typically accounts for about a quarter of sales. However, those diners haven’t been visiting the burrito chain’s restaurants as frequently, instead opting to cook at home, according to CEO Scott Boatwright.
    “This group is facing several headwinds, including unemployment, increased student loan repayment and slower real wage growth,” he said on the company’s conference call last month.
    Beyond their fast-casual meals — known colloquially by some as “slop bowls” — younger consumers are also trying to spend less on necessities, like new glasses or contacts.
    The younger shoppers that glasses maker Warby Parker serves have been feeling “increasingly… uncertain about their future” and “more selective in their purchasing behavior,” said Warby’s co-founder and co-CEO Dave Gilboa on the company’s 2025 third quarter earnings call earlier this month.
    “We’ve seen a moderation in average order value or basket size in categories that skew younger,” said Gilboa. For example, the company has seen shoppers pull back on its higher priced frames in favor of its $95 option.
    In weakening economies, younger people can start to feel distressed earlier than older groups because they tend to earn less and have less money in savings, and are more likely to be unemployed, according to economists.
    To add to the issues, companies across the U.S. have paused hiring, which puts younger consumers who have just graduated high school or college at a particular disadvantage, according to Allison Shrivastava, a senior economist for Indeed. Plus, a stream of recent job cuts has targeted many entry-level employees, worsening employment prospects for younger workers.
    The difference in unemployment rates between younger and older people is now starker than usual, Shrivastava said. The unemployment rate for workers between 25 and 34 years old hit 4.4% in August, higher than the 3.5% rate for the 35- to 44-year old cohort and the 2.9% rates for the 45- to 54-year old and 55 years and older segments. (More recent data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics is unavailable due to the federal government shutdown.)
    Shrivastava sees the pullback in spending as largely a response to the frozen labor market.
    “We’re starting to get some frostbite in the form of declining consumer spending,” Shrivastava said, adding that “significant” layoffs could push the economy into a recession.

    Brands bucking the trends

    A shopper carries a Coach bag at an outlet mall in Commerce, California, US, on Thursday, June 27, 2024. 
    Eric Thayer | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Though consumers have cut their spending in key areas, some companies have proved resilient because of their brand strength or the perceived quality of their products.
    Even as some younger shoppers bought fewer Chipotle burritos and Cava bowls, Coach parent Tapestry said it saw strong handbag sales in recent months — with Gen Z customers driving much of the growth.
    Tapestry, which also owns Kate Spade, raised its full-year forecast after beating quarterly sales and profit expectations.
    In an interview with CNBC, Tapestry Joanne Crevoiserat attributed that to both the popularity of the Coach brand and younger shoppers who are spending on fashion rather than other areas. She said the company’s research shows “the Gen Z consumer specifically is highly fashion engaged, spending slightly more of their budget on fashion.”
    She said the company has seen no difference in sales performance by income bracket, as it attracts shoppers from other generations as well as Gen Z.
    Coach and Kate Spade’s price points provide an edge, too, according to a note from Telsey Advisory Group. Their handbags have a significant price gap with European luxury brands — even as Tapestry brands raise price points.
    Even so, Tapestry disappointed Wall Street with a more conservative holiday-quarter outlook.
    Tapestry isn’t alone. Swiss sportswear company On and Ralph Lauren are also finding growth across all consumer segments despite a choppy economy.
    On, which reported fiscal 2025 third-quarter earnings on Wednesday, raised its full-year guidance for the third quarter in a row after seeing sales grow about 25%, bucking a slowdown in the sneaker market. 
    The company’s performance stands in stark contrast to competitors like Nike and Hoka, which are planning for either a sales decline or slowdown in growth. In late September, Nike said it was expecting sales in its holiday quarter to fall by a low single-digit percentage. Deckers, the parent company of On’s fellow buzzy footwear brand Hoka, trimmed its sales guidance for Hoka in October. 
    Meanwhile, Ralph Lauren raised its full-year outlook earlier this month after seeing sales rise 17% in its fiscal 2026 second quarter. During a call with analysts, CEO Patrice Jean Louis Louvet said it saw “balanced growth across men, women and younger cohorts.”
    Ralph Lauren is benefiting because it has a higher-income core consumer, but the company has also worked to ensure its assortment is landing with shoppers and its brand is still relevant. One of the biggest holiday trends currently hitting TikTok is a “Ralph Lauren Christmas,” which combines the brand’s old-money aesthetic with decor for those looking for a traditional holiday feel.
    “This cultural strength has also been instrumental in attracting younger consumers,” said GlobalData managing director and retail analyst Neil Saunders in a note. “Our data indicate that the brand’s penetration among younger demographics has increased. This is aided by designs such as the limited-edition Morehouse and Spelman College vintage collections, which resonate with younger consumers and play on their desire for nostalgia and heritage.”
    Dutch Bros., the fast-growing drink chain, also saw growth from younger consumers in its latest quarter. The company’s wide-ranging menu, from protein lattes to vibrant energy drinks, can be heavily customized, a feature that has proved popular with Gen Z consumers.
    “We’re seeing really incredible performance of those younger cohorts,” CEO Christine Barone said during the company’s conference call earlier this month. “I think that during times like this, customers are choosing the brands that they love most and really deciding to spend their dollars there.”
    Dutch Bros. reported quarterly same-store sales growth of 7.4%, fueled by a nearly 7% increase in traffic to its stores.
    Chili’s, which is owned by Brinker International, also saw traffic to its restaurants jump in its most recent quarter. The casual dining chain has won over diners through a turnaround strategy focused on improving the in-restaurant experience, plus savvy marketing that pitted its prices against those of fast-food chains.
    “Our customer base is very representative of the U.S. consumer across all income cohorts, but our cohort growing the fastest is actually now households with income under $60,000,” Brinker CEO Kevin Hochman said on the company’s conference call in late October.
    Others in the retail industry aren’t worried about slow spending during the holidays.
    At the malls, buzzy companies like Vuori and Alo, digitally native brands like Princess Polly and popular retailers like Abercrombie & Fitch are drawing bigger crowds as the holidays approach, said Kevin McCrain, CEO of the retail business at Brookfield Properties, one of the largest U.S. mall owners.
    Even as the economy shows blemishes, he said the company hasn’t seen a change in shopping patterns or landlord demand. And he said he still expects spending across November and December to increase from last year.
    So does the National Retail Federation. The trade group expects overall holiday spending in November and December to grow by 3.7% to 4.2% year over year and to top $1 trillion for the first time, even as shoppers scout for deals and make tradeoffs.
    Mark Mathews, chief economist at NRF, said the group’s consumer survey shows a larger percentage of shoppers are “holding off” for Black Friday and Thanksgiving weekend sales than a year ago. He added consumers are trimming back in other areas, like eating out, so they have money set aside for gifts.
    “At the end of the day, it’s the holiday season,” Brookfield’s McCrain said. “People get caught up in the lights and Santa Claus, and everyone wants to be positive and hopeful and just have a great time.” More