Business

American Eagle cut its full-year sales forecast and issued holiday guidance that came in below expectations.
The apparel retailer saw strong demand during back-to-school but said consumers are pulling back between key moments.
American Eagle’s Aerie brand saw strong growth, with comparable sales up 5%, on top of 12% in the year-ago period.

A shopper walks by an American Eagle store on November 21, 2023 in Glendale, California.
Justin Sullivan | Getty Images

American Eagle shares dropped about 13% in extended trading Wednesday after the company reported third-quarter earnings in which it issued weak holiday guidance and cut its full-year forecast. The company said it’s contending with value-seeking consumers who are only willing to spend during key shopping moments. 
The apparel retailer narrowly missed Wall Street’s expectations on the top line, but beat on the bottom line. 

Here’s how American Eagle performed during its fiscal third quarter compared with what Wall Street was anticipating, based on a survey of analysts by LSEG:

Earnings per share: 48 cents adjusted vs. 46 cents expected
Revenue: $1.29 billion vs. $1.30 billion expected

The company’s reported net income for the three-month period that ended Nov. 2 was $80 million, or 41 cents per share, compared with $96.7 million, or 49 cents per share, a year earlier. Excluding one-time charges related to restructuring and impairment costs, American Eagle posted an adjusted profit of 48 cents per share. 
Sales dropped to $1.29 billion, down about 1% from $1.3 billion a year earlier. 
While it was narrow, Wednesday’s miss is the third quarter in a row that American Eagle has not met Wall Street’s sales targets.
In a statement, CEO Jay Schottenstein touted a “strong” back-to-school shopping season but said demand remains inconsistent between major shopping events. 

“We have entered the holiday season well positioned, with our leading brands offering high-quality merchandise, great gifts and an outstanding shopping experience across channels,” Schottenstein said. “Key selling periods have seen a positive customer response, yet we remain cognizant of potential choppiness during non-peak periods.” 
Consumers coming out for key shopping moments followed by sales sharply dropping off has been a consistent theme across the retail industry. Foot Locker cited a similar dynamic when reporting earnings earlier Wednesday, as did Dollar Tree.
For its holiday quarter, American Eagle is expecting comparable sales to be up around 1%, with total sales down about 4%, including an $85 million impact from having one less selling week and a later start to the holiday shopping season. The outlook is below the 2.2% comparable sales growth StreetAccount was looking for and the 1% sales decline LSEG had expected. 
As a result, American Eagle is now expecting comparable sales to grow by 3% for the full year, down from prior guidance of 4% growth and below StreetAccount’s estimate of 4.1%. It’s now expecting full-year sales to be up 1%, down from previous guidance of between 2% and 3% and below LSEG expectations of 2.5% growth. 
Similar to other retailers, American Eagle had taken a cautious approach to the back half of the year as it contended with uncertainty around the 2024 election and the overall macroeconomic environment. But unlike its competitors, it has kept that cautious tone.
Both Abercrombie & Fitch and Dick’s Sporting Goods, which issued cautious outlooks earlier this year, reversed their previous mood when reporting earnings earlier this month. 
Despite the underwhelming outlook and sales miss, American Eagle is seeing strong demand for its Aerie brand. Third-quarter revenue for Aerie came in at an all-time high for the company, and comparable sales grew 5%, on top of 12% growth from the year-ago period. More

For MORE than two years most Russian businesses carried on unscathed by the war in Ukraine. A surge in defence spending and subsidised loans for consumers and firms propped up spending at home, even as sanctions curtailed access to foreign markets and inflation jumped. Western companies from Volkswagen, a German carmaker, to Shell, a Dutch oil giant, sold their Russian operations to local enterprises. After an initial tumble, the MOEX, an index of Russian stocks, steadily recovered (see chart). More

President-elect Donald Trump on Wednesday nominated Jared Isaacman, a private astronaut and the billionaire CEO of Shift4, to be the next NASA administrator.
Isaacman has led two private spaceflights through SpaceX, including the company’s first spacewalk in September.
“It is the honor of a lifetime to serve in this role and to work alongside NASA’s extraordinary team to realize our shared dreams of exploration and discovery,” Isaacman wrote in a statement.

Inspiration4 mission commander Jared Isaacman, founder and chief executive officer of Shift4 Payments, stands for a portrait in front of the recovered first stage of a Falcon 9 rocket at Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (SpaceX) on February 2, 2021 in Hawthorne, California. 
Patrick T. Fallon | Afp | Getty Images

President-elect Donald Trump on Wednesday nominated Jared Isaacman, the billionaire CEO of Shift4 who has led two private spaceflights, to be the next head of NASA.
“Jared will drive NASA’s mission of discovery and inspiration, paving the way for groundbreaking achievements in Space science, technology, and exploration,” Trump wrote in a post on social media.

Isaacman accepted Trump’s nomination to be NASA administrator in a statement: “Having been fortunate to see our amazing planet from space, I am passionate about America leading the most incredible adventure in human history.”
“It is the honor of a lifetime to serve in this role and to work alongside NASA’s extraordinary team to realize our shared dreams of exploration and discovery,” Isaacman said.
Isaacman said he plans to leave Shift4 once he’s confirmed as NASA administrator. In a letter to Shift4 employees, Isaacman wrote he intends “to remain CEO until my confirmation” and “retain the majority of my equity interest,” but will reduce his shareholder voting power.

Jared Isaacman, Mission Commander, steps out of the manned Polaris Dawn mission’s “Dragon” capsule after it splashed down off the coast of Dry Tortugas, Florida, after completing the first human spaceflight mission by non-government astronauts of the Polaris Program.
– | Afp | Getty Images

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration is currently led by Administrator Bill Nelson, nominated in 2021 by President Joe Biden. Nelson did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.
Nelson, a former U.S. Senator, currently oversees NASA’s nearly $25 billion budget. During his tenure, the space agency launched the first uncrewed mission under its top priority, the multi-billion dollar Artemis moon program. But subsequent planned crewed missions, ultimately aiming to return U.S. astronauts to the lunar surface, have been heavily delayed and over budget.

Read more CNBC space news

Isaacman has led two private spaceflights through SpaceX, in 2021 and 2024, commanding a pair of crews on multiday trips around the Earth.
His spaceflight ambitions have fostered an increasingly close relationship with SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, who has become an influential figure in Trump’s administration planning.
Isaacman has previously criticized NASA’s Artemis architecture, particularly the program’s heavy spending on its expendable SLS rockets and the agency’s decision to award a second crewed lunar lander contract to Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin.
“Spend billions on lunar lander redundancy that you don’t have with SLS at the expense of dozens of scientific programs. I don’t like it,” Isaacman wrote in a post earlier this year.

Polaris Dawn commander Jared Isaacman emerges from SpaceX’s Dragon capsule during a spacewalk on Sept. 12, 2024.

In addition to running payments company Shift4, Isaacman has been leading an effort called the Polaris Program — a trio of missions with increasingly ambitious goals.
The first mission in that program, Polaris Dawn, launched earlier this year and saw Isaacman conduct a brief spacewalk from SpaceX’s Dragon capsule — the company’s first such extravehicular activity, or EVA, in space.
“Back at home we all have a lot of work to do, but from here, Earth sure looks like a perfect world,” Isaacman said during the spacewalk after emerging from the capsule. More

Disney unveiled an ESPN tile on Disney+ on Wednesday.
ESPN is making about 100 live games available for Disney+ subscribers who aren’t signed up for ESPN+.
ESPN is developing two sports studio shows just for Disney+ geared to casual sports fans.

SportsCenter at ESPN Headquarters.
The Washington Post | The Washington Post | Getty Images

ESPN is coming to Disney+. Now, the sports network wants to make sure Disney+ users come to ESPN.
Walt Disney debuted a dedicated ESPN tile Wednesday on Disney+ for people who subscribe to ESPN+, its sports streaming platform, to watch programming without leaving the Disney+ application. Next fall, when ESPN launches its yet-to-be-named “flagship” service, those subscribers will get full access to all ESPN content through the ESPN tile on Disney+.

Disney is making about 100 live games available to Disney+ members without a corresponding ESPN subscription. Those events will span college football and basketball, the National Basketball Association and WNBA, the National Hockey League, Major League Baseball, tennis, golf, the Little League World Series, and UFC, ESPN Chairman Jimmy Pitaro said in an interview.
Next week’s alternate “Simpsons” telecast of the NFL’s “Monday Night Football” game between the Cincinnati Bengals and Dallas Cowboys will also be available to Disney+ subscribers, as well as five NBA Christmas games.
“Now when you subscribe to Disney+, you’ll have access to kids and family, general entertainment if you’re a Hulu subscriber, and sports,” said Pitaro. “Our goal is to serve sports fans anytime, anywhere.”
ESPN will also include some of its studio programming — such as “College Gameday,” “Pardon the Interruption” and certain podcasts that include video — on Disney+ for non-ESPN subscribers. Some ESPN sports-related films and documentaries will also appear on Disney+ married to whatever sports season is active, Pitaro said.
ESPN’s programming will also be integrated within the Disney+ search, similar to Hulu’s integration earlier this year. If a Disney+ subscriber who isn’t an ESPN customer clicks on something that requires an ESPN subscription, the user will be prompted to sign up within the app.

New content for Disney+

ESPN is also creating two studio shows specifically for Disney+, Pitaro said. The first will be a daily “SportsCenter” just for Disney+ subscribers, which will air live on Disney+ at a set time and then remain on the platform for on-demand viewing.
The second is a women’s sports show that may air weekly or several times a week. Both programs are in development and will be made for a more casual sports fan, said Pitaro.
“Our research shows there’s very little overlap between people watching Disney+ and ESPN linear,” said Pitaro.
Disney+ has a strong female audience that Pitaro hopes will tune into the weekly’s women’s show, which he first alluded to in an interview with CNBC Sport in October.
ESPN+ has about 30,000 live games each year and costs $11.99 per month when purchased separately from Disney+. A Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+ bundle (with ads) costs $16.99 per month.
Disclosure: Comcast, which owns CNBC parent NBCUniversal, is a co-owner of Hulu.

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO

WATCH: CNBC Sport videocast: ESPN Chairman Jimmy Pitaro More

Foot Locker is feeling the holiday blues after seeing weak consumer demand and steep promotions across the sneaker marketplace.
The company fell short of Wall Street’s expectations on the top and bottom lines and cut its full-year guidance.
“Consumer spending trends softened following the peak Back-to-School period in August, and the promotional environment was more elevated than anticipated,” CEO Mary Dillon said in a news release.

Foot Locker store location on 34th street in New York City.
Courtesy: Foot Locker

Foot Locker slashed its full-year guidance on Wednesday after reporting a rough set of quarterly results that could be a warning sign for its largest brand partner Nike.
The sneaker giant fell short of Wall Street’s expectations on the top and bottom lines and blamed the miss on soft consumer demand and elevated promotions across the marketplace. The company also saw “softness” at Nike, CEO Mary Dillon told CNBC in an interview. 

“There are definitely some brands that we’re seeing comp gains, and then, you know, we’re also contending with some more recent softness out of Nike,” said Dillon. “Given their size and scale, it kind of makes sense that it would have an impact.” 
Foot Locker shares dropped 15% in premarket trading after it posted the results.
Here’s how Foot Locker did in its third fiscal quarter compared with what Wall Street was anticipating, based on a survey of analysts by LSEG:

Earnings per share: 33 cents adjusted vs. 41 cents expected
Revenue: $1.96 billion vs. $2.01 billion expected

In the three months ended Nov. 2, Foot Locker swung to a loss of $33 million, or 34 cents per share, compared with earnings of $28 million, or 30 cents per share, a year earlier. Excluding one-time items related to impairment charges for its atmos brand and other expenses, Foot Locker reported earnings of $31 million, or 33 cents per share. 
Sales dropped to $1.96 billion, down about 1.4% from $1.99 billion a year earlier. 

Dillon explained that consumers are showing up for key shopping moments, such as back-to-school and the recent stretch between Thanksgiving and Cyber Monday, but pulling back in between those events, making the peaks and valleys sharper than expected. Foot Locker is also dealing with slow demand for Nike, which is trying to turn around its business after relying too heavily on the same styles to drive sales. 
Nike veteran Elliott Hill took the helm of the company less than a month ago, and Wall Street has not yet heard his strategy. Given Foot Locker’s performance during its third quarter, Nike could post another set of less-than-stellar quarterly results when it reports on Dec. 19.
Nike is Foot Locker’s largest brand partner, accounting for about 60% of sales. If Nike is struggling, Foot Locker will inevitably suffer, too. 
“It’s not like across the board with all brands. Frankly … I would just say that there’s some that are more promotional, but in total, the category is pretty promotional,” said Dillon. “There’s an elevated promotional level in this category that we hadn’t forecasted to be as it is.” 
She reiterated that Foot Locker’s relationship with Nike and its new CEO is “very strong” and expects the slow demand to be a blip as Hill gets his footing. 
“We have a great relationship with him [and] feel very confident about where he and his team are going,” said Dillon. “I think we’re going to work through all that, that’s the thing.”

Rough guidance

Given the tough situation with Nike and the pressures facing Foot Locker’s lower-income consumer, the company slashed its guidance for the full year and issued a disappointing holiday forecast.
For the holiday quarter, Foot Locker expects sales to be down between 1.5% and 3.5%, compared to a gain of about 2% in the year-ago period. The company said the previous fiscal year had an additional sales week.
Foot Locker’s guidance range is mostly worse than the 1.6% decline that analysts had expected, according to LSEG. The company also anticipates comparable sales will rise between 1.5% and 3.5%, largely below expectations of 3.4% growth, according to StreetAccount. 
For the full year, Foot Locker now expects sales to fall between 1% and 1.5%, compared to previous guidance of down 1% to up 1%. Analysts were expecting a decline of 0.4%, according to LSEG.
The retailer also cut its comparable sales outlook for the full year and now anticipates comps will grow between 1% and 1.5%, compared to previous guidance of 1% to 3%. Analysts expected the metric would climb 1.8%, according to StreetAccount. 
Foot Locker also lowered its full-year earnings outlook and now expects adjusted earnings per share to be between $1.20 and $1.30, below Wall Street expectations of $1.54. Foot Locker previously expected earnings to be between $1.50 and $1.70 per share. 
The company attributed the revised guidance, in part, to elevated promotions and the shorter year, which is expected to impact sales by about $100 million. 
Despite the slashed guidance and gloomy holiday outlook, there were some bright spots during the period. For the second quarter in a row, Foot Locker’s comparable sales grew compared to the previous year, with a 2.4% increase. That’s below the 3.2% analysts expected, according to StreetAccount, but it’s one indicator that Dillon’s turnaround plan is continuing to show signs of life.
Champs, which has been dragging down Foot Locker’s overall business, also posted positive comparable sales at 2.8% growth, as did WSS, which saw an increase of 1.8%.
During the quarter, Foot Locker’s gross margin also improved by 2.3 percentage points, thanks to fewer promotions than during the year-ago period, and it saw the highest conversion it has all year, said Dillon. 
The former Ulta Beauty boss added the company is planning to continue to use its cash on hand to finance its store refurbishment programs and is feeling “really good” about the progress it’s made.
“It is a bit of a tale of two worlds, which is that we feel like what we’re doing is really working well, but in the marketplace that we’re seeing right now, we think this is the right call,” said Dillon of the decision to cut guidance. “It doesn’t shake our confidence in where we’re heading with the Lace Up Plan and it doesn’t shake our confidence that these are the right things to do.” More

General Motors expects a restructuring of its joint venture operations with SAIC Motor Corp. in China to cost more than $5 billion in charges and writedowns.
The restructuring charges for the “SGM” joint venture are anticipated to include “plant closures and portfolio optimization,” according to the filing.
GM said most of the costs are expected to be recognized as non-cash, special item charges during the fourth quarter.

Employees work on Buick Envision SUVs at General Motors’ Dong Yue assembly plant, officially known as SAIC-GM Dong Yue Motors Co., Ltd., on Nov. 17, 2022, in Yantai, Shandong Province of China.
Tang Ke | Visual China Group | Getty Images

DETROIT – General Motors expects a restructuring of its joint venture operations with SAIC Motor Corp. in China to cost more than $5 billion in non-cash charges and writedowns, the Detroit automaker disclosed in a federal filing Wednesday morning.
GM said it expects to write down the value of its joint-venture operations in China by between $2.6 billion and $2.9 billion. It also anticipates another $2.7 billion in charges to restructure the business, including “plant closures and portfolio optimization,” according to the filing.

GM, which previously announced plans to restructure the operations in China, did not disclose any additional details about the expected closures.
“As we have consistently said, we are focused on capital efficiency and cost discipline and have been working with SGM to turn around the business in China in order to be sustainable and profitable in the market. We are close to finalizing our restructuring plan with our partner, and we expect our results in China in 2025 to show year-over-year improvement,” GM said in an emailed statement.
GM said it believes the joint venture “has the ability to restructure without new cash investments” from the American automaker.
A majority of the restructuring costs is expected to be recognized as non-cash, special item charges during the fourth quarter. That means they will impact the automaker’s net income, but not its adjusted earnings before interest and taxes – a key metric monitored by Wall Street.

GM’s operations in China have shifted from a profit engine to liability in the past decade as competition grows from government-backed domestic automakers fueled by nationalism, and as a generational shift in consumer perceptions of the automotive industry and electric vehicles takes hold.

Equity income from GM’s Chinese operations and joint ventures peaked at more than $2 billion in 2014 and 2015.
GM’s market share in China, including its joint ventures, has plummeted from roughly 15% as recently as 2015 to 8.6% last year — the first time it has dropped below 9% since 2003. GM’s equity income from the operations have also fallen, down 78.5% since peaking in 2014, according to regulatory filings.
GM’s U.S.-based brands such as Buick and Chevrolet have seen sales drop more than its joint venture sales with SAIC Motor, Wuling Motors and others. The joint venture models accounted for about 60% of its 2.1 million vehicles sold last year in China.
Prior to this year, the only quarterly losses for GM in China since 2009 were a $167 million shortfall during the first quarter of 2020 due to the coronavirus pandemic and an $87 million loss during the second quarter of 2022.
The Detroit automaker has reported three consecutive quarterly losses in equity income for its Chinese operations this year, totaling $347 million. That includes a loss of $137 million during the third quarter. More

Executives from American, United, Delta, Frontier and Spirit are set to testify before a Senate panel about their seating fees.
U.S. carriers brought in more than $12 billion in seating fees between 2018 and 2023.

Seats in the economy class cabin on board an American Airlines Boeing Co. 777-300ER aircraft.
Brent Lewin | Bloomberg | Getty Images

U.S. airline executives are set to defend their seating fees before a Senate panel Wednesday after the subcommittee accused the industry of charging “junk” fees to bring in billions in revenue.
American, Delta, United, Spirit and Frontier brought in $12.4 billion in seating fees between 2018 and 2023, according to a report released Nov. 26 by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.

“Airlines these days view their customers as little more than walking piggy banks to be shaken down for every possible dime,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., the subcommittee’s chair, said in written remarks before the hearing.
Those extra charges are for seats with additional legroom, as well as those in “preferred” locations that are closer to the front of the plane, or window or aisle seats, the report noted.
“Our seat selection products are all voluntary,” Stephen Johnson, American’s chief strategy officer, said in written testimony ahead of the hearing. “For customers who value sitting in more in-demand locations, we do offer the opportunity to pay for more desirable seats.”
The Biden administration and some lawmakers have promised to crack down on so-called “junk” fees and have cited the airline industry as a target for cuts.
Executives at large airlines have defended their strategy to offer several types of economy service and add-on fees for selection of certain seats or checked bags, things that used to come for free with a ticket, and have said these options are communicated to customers.

Meanwhile, carriers have been racing to add more premium seats on board to increase revenue.

Read more CNBC airline news

“Fares that may require a fee to select a seat, for example, are clearly denoted with a symbol indicating that a seat in a different fare class or with extra legroom will need to be purchased for a fee,” Johnson said. “Similar information is included for potential bag and other fees.”
Discounters such as Spirit and Frontier, which pioneered the fee-based model in the U.S., prompted competitors to come up with their own bare-bones basic economy class. Spirit filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in November after a failed acquisition by JetBlue Airways, a Pratt & Whitney engine recall, increased competition and more demanding consumer tastes.
The hearing, which begins at 10 a.m. ET, will also include testimony from executives from Delta, United, Frontier and Spirit. More

Eli Lilly said its obesity drug Zepbound led to more weight loss than its main rival, Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy, in the first head-to-head clinical trial on the two weekly injections. 
The findings suggest Zepbound may be a superior treatment for weight loss, helping patients with obesity or who are overweight lose 20.2% of their body weight on average after 72 weeks.
Wegovy helped people lose 13.7% of their weight on average after the same time period.  

A combination image shows an injection pen of Zepbound, Eli Lilly’s weight loss drug, and boxes of Wegovy, made by Novo Nordisk. 

Eli Lilly on Wednesday said its obesity drug Zepbound led to more weight loss than its main rival, Novo Nordisk’s Wegovy, in the first head-to-head clinical trial on the weekly injections. 
The findings suggest Zepbound may be a superior treatment for weight loss, helping obese or overweight patients lose 20.2% of their body weight, or roughly 50 pounds, on average after 72 weeks in the phase three trial. Meanwhile, Wegovy helped people lose 13.7% of their weight, or about 33 pounds, on average after the same time period.  

Eli Lilly said Zepbound provided a 47% higher relative weight reduction compared with Wegovy in the trial. The company added that more than 31% of people taking Zepbound lost at least a quarter of their body weight, compared to just about 16% of those on Wegovy who lost that much weight.
Separate studies on the drugs, along with a recent head-to-head analysis of health records, have similarly implied that Zepbound outperforms Wegovy in terms of weight loss. A late-stage study on Zepbound showed that it helped patients lose more than 22% of their weight on average over 72 weeks, while a separate study on Wegovy showed that it led to 15% weight loss on average over 68 weeks.
But the Wednesday data appears to be the most concrete evidence of Zepbound’s edge, as the trial randomly assigned 751 patients to receive the maximum dose of either drug. The study specifically followed patients who were obese or overweight with at least one weight-related medical condition, not including diabetes.
“Given the increased interest around obesity medications, we conducted this study to help health care providers and patients make informed decisions about treatment choice,” Dr. Leonard Glass, senior vice president of global medical affairs at Eli Lilly Cardiometabolic Health, said in a release.
Eli Lilly is still evaluating the results, which it plans to publish in a peer-reviewed journal and present at a medical meeting next year.

The most common side effects of both drugs were gastrointestinal and generally mild to moderate in severity.
Zepbound’s greater weight loss is a huge advantage for Eli Lilly, which is competing with Novo Nordisk for a larger share of the booming weight loss drug market. Some analysts expect the space to be worth $150 billion a year by the early 2030s. 
Wegovy entered the market around two years before Zepbound, which won approval in the U.S. in late 2023. Still, some analysts believe Zepbound has a strong shot of becoming the best-selling drug of all time after more years on the market.
Data analytics firm GlobalData forecasts Zepbound will generate $27.2 billion in annual sales by 2030 and Wegovy will book $18.7 billion in annual revenue by the same year, according to data from November. 
Demand has far outstripped supply for Zepbound, Wegovy and their diabetes counterparts over the last year, forcing Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk to pour billions into expanding their manufacturing capacity for the injections. Those efforts appear to be paying off, as the Food and Drug Administration now lists all doses of those treatments as “available” on its drug shortage database. 
Still, some patients struggle to access the drugs due to the spotty insurance coverage of weight loss treatments in the U.S. Without insurance or other savings, Zepbound and Wegovy both cost around $1,000 per month. 
The treatments work differently. 
Zepbound tamps down appetite and regulates blood sugar by activating two gut hormones, called GIP and GLP-1. Wegovy activates GLP-1 but does not target GIP, which some researchers say may also affect how the body breaks down sugar and fat. More