Finance

The International Monetary Fund upgraded its global growth forecast for 2024 by 0.2 percentage points, to 3.1%.
Resilience in the U.S., Chinese fiscal stimulus and a strong performance by large emerging market economies all contributed to the slightly brighter picture.
There are new risks to commodities and supply chains from Middle East volatility, but inflation globally has fallen faster than expected.

Buildings in Pudong’s Lujiazui Financial District in Shanghai, China, on Monday, Jan. 29, 2024. 
Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

The International Monetary Fund on Tuesday nudged its global growth forecast higher, citing the unexpected strength of the U.S. economy and fiscal support measures in China.
It now sees global growth in 2024 at 3.1%, up 0.2 percentage points from its prior October projection, followed by 3.2% expansion in 2025.

Large emerging market economies including Brazil, India and Russia have also performed better than previously thought.
The IMF believes there is now a reduced likelihood of a so-called “hard landing,” an economic contraction following a period of strong growth, despite new risks from commodity price spikes and supply chain issues due to geopolitical volatility in the Middle East.
It forecasts growth this year of 2.1% in the U.S., 0.9% in both the euro zone and Japan, and 0.6% in the United Kingdom.
“What we’ve seen is a very resilient global economy in the second half of last year, and that’s going to carry over into 2024,” the IMF’s chief economist, Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas, told CNBC’s Karen Tso on Tuesday.

“This is a combination of strong demand in some of these countries, private consumption, government spending. But also, and this is quite important in the current context, a supply component as well … So very strong labor markets, supply chain frictions that have been easing, and the decline in energy and commodity prices.”

The latest official figures showed the U.S. economy tearing past economists’ expectations in the fourth quarter, with growth of 3.3%.
China has faced a host of issues over the last year, including a disappointing rebound in post-pandemic spending, concerns over deflation and an ongoing property sector crisis. The government has rolled out a host of stimulus measures in response, contributing to the IMF’s upgrade.
However, the IMF’s forecasts remain below the global growth average between 2000 and 2019 of 3.8%. Higher interest rates, the withdrawal of some fiscal support programs and low productivity growth continue to weigh, the institution said.

But restrictive monetary policy has led to inflation falling faster than expected in most regions, which Gourinchas called the “other piece of good news” in Tuesday’s report. The IMF sees global inflation at 5.8% in 2024 and 4.4% in 2025. In advanced economies, that falls to 2.6% this year and 2% next year.
“The battle against inflation is being won, and we have a higher likelihood of a soft landing. So that sets the stage for central banks, the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, the Bank of England, and others, to start easing their policy rates, once we know for sure that we are on that path,” Gourinchas said.
“The projection right now is that central banks are going to be waiting to get a little bit more data, they are going meeting by meeting, they are data dependent, confirming that we are on that path. That’s the baseline. And then if we are, then by the second half of the year we’ll see rate cuts,” he continued.
While central banks must not ease too early, there is also a risk coming into sight of policy remaining too tight for too long which would slow growth and bring inflation below 2% in advanced economies, Gourinchas added. More

As investors enter an unprecedented year for elections around the world amid multiple large-scale conflicts at risk of further escalation, Beat Wittmann, partner at Porta Advisors, acknowledged that “politics will remain difficult and confusing,” but that markets will likely be sanguine.
Wittmann also said the outcome of November’s election would be “pretty irrelevant for markets, quite frankly.”

Traders work on the floor at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City, U.S., January 29, 2024.
Brendan Mcdermid | Reuters

Geopolitical risks may be mounting, but stocks are still the “asset class of choice,” according to Beat Wittmann, partner at Porta Advisors, who also said the outcome of the U.S. election in November would be “pretty irrelevant” for markets.
As investors enter an unprecedented year for elections around the world amid multiple large-scale conflicts at risk of further escalation, Wittmann acknowledged that “politics will remain difficult and confusing,” but that markets will likely be sanguine.

“There are two transmission mechanisms. One is energy prices — will the trouble in the Middle East be a transmission into higher energy prices, or the war in Eastern Europe? Not really, if you look at how energy prices have developed,” he told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe” on Tuesday.
“And the second thing is really international trade and trade routes. We have seen it brutally in Covid and we see a bit of it of course — traffic through Suez, insurance companies putting up costs, etc.— but that’s all digestible.”

He added that markets had “gotten used to trouble in geopolitics” over the last five years, so the impact on asset prices of any further bad news would be somewhat limited.
Last year offers some support to this theory. Despite the breakout of the Israel-Hamas war and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine showing no sign of abating, along with a host of other simmering geopolitical tensions around the world, the S&P 500 gained 24% in 2023.
However, much of the momentum was driven by the outstanding performance of the so-called “Magnificent Seven” mega-cap tech stocks, leading to some concerns among investors about concentration risk. Wittmann acknowledged that risk, but remains bullish about broader upside potential in stocks.

“I think it’s on track, of course expectations get ever higher, so there will be at some stage disappointments here and there, but stock-specific.”

“But technology clearly has real mania potential, and there could be even a melt-up in the market led by technology.”
Monetary policy emerged as the key driver of a huge rally toward the end of the year after the Federal Reserve signaled that at least three interest rate cuts were on the table in 2024, offering a particular boost for high-growth stocks. The Fed releases its next monetary policy decision and forward guidance on Wednesday.
Wittmann suggested the only risk to this momentum would be if inflation proves stickier than the Fed expects because of some unforeseen geopolitical risk coming into play, resulting in interest rates being kept higher for longer.

But he believes that would be a problem only for fixed income and the growth stocks that have enjoyed much of the recent rally, and would be positive for value stocks — those trading at a discount relative to their financial fundamentals — meaning if “in any doubt, I think equities are really the asset class of choice.”

U.S. election ‘irrelevant’ for markets

Much of the conversation at the recent World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, focused on the possibility of Donald Trump returning to the White House, and whether his erratic decision-making and radical policy proposals, such as sweeping 10% tariffs on all imports, would be material for investors.
Wittmann said the outcome of November’s election would be “pretty irrelevant for markets, quite frankly.”
“If you have such a strong position as an economy, which the U.S. has in a supreme way, controlling and basically dominating finance, dominating technology, dominating aerospace defense, having achieved strategic autonomy in energy, for example, then it’s really difficult, so no matter whether he gets elected or not, he will also not be able to surprise,” he said. More

Alibaba-backed augmented reality glasses company Xreal said it received $60 million in new funding, giving the company a valuation of more than $1 billion.
Augmented reality (AR) technology allows digital images to be imposed over the real world.
Xreal’s latest AR glasses model, the Air 2 Ultra, is set to start shipping in March and is available for pre-order at $699, a fraction of Apple’s price tag of around $3,500 for the Vision Pro.

Xreal Air 2 in action. Xreal’s augmented reality glasses is compatible with gaming consoles and can allow users to play games on a large virtual screen

BEIJING — Alibaba-backed augmented reality glasses company Xreal said Monday it received $60 million in new funding, giving the company a valuation of more than $1 billion.
That valuation gives the startup unicorn status, the first in the AR glasses industry, Xreal claimed. It did not share who participated in the latest funding round.

Augmented reality (AR) technology allows digital images to be imposed over the real world.
Apple’s Vision Pro virtual reality headset, set for release in the U.S. on Feb. 2, also allows users to see the real world using what the company calls “spatial computing” technology.
Xreal’s latest AR glasses model, the Air 2 Ultra, is set to start shipping in March. It is available for pre-order at $699, a fraction of Apple’s price tag of around $3,500 for the Vision Pro.
On Jan. 8, Xreal said it had shipped 350,000 AR glasses since the company was launched in 2017. That’s compared to 250,000 units as of October, and 150,000 units as of May.
The startup said it plans to use the latest funding for research and development, as well as factory expansion. Total backing from investors has now reached $300 million, Xreal said.
— CNBC’s Arjun Kharpal contributed to this report. More

Employee confidence touched its lowest point since 2016 in January, according to career site Glassdoor.
That’s likely because of recent layoff announcements, one expert said. They’ve come from prominent companies including Amazon, BlackRock, Citigroup, eBay, Google, Microsoft and Universal Music Group.
While the job market has cooled from red-hot levels, it’s still robust, economists said.

Maskot | Digitalvision | Getty Images

Workers are sour on the job market — but that pessimism may be somewhat misplaced.
The Glassdoor Employee Confidence Index in January fell to its lowest level since 2016, when the career site began tracking the metric, it said Monday. The index measures how workers feel about their employer’s six-month business outlook.

The decline suggests job security is a “prominent” worry, said Daniel Zhao, lead economist at Glassdoor. “It’s a signal that employees are concerned heading into 2024,” he said.

Layoff headlines mask ‘very robust’ job market

That deterioration is likely due to a wave of layoff announcements in recent weeks, Zhao said.
So far in 2024, for example, big technology firms including Amazon, eBay, Google and Microsoft have announced job cuts. But it’s not just tech. Others such as BlackRock, Citigroup and Universal Music Group also announced layoffs.
U.S.-based companies planned about 722,000 job cuts in 2023, almost double those announced in 2022, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas, an outplacement and executive coaching firm.

However, those recent headlines mask strength in the overall job market, economists said.

From a worker’s perspective, things “don’t get any better,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics.
Despite pockets of layoffs in certain industries such as tech, Zandi said job cuts across the broad U.S. labor market continue to hover near historic lows, where they’ve been since spring 2021.

New claims for unemployment insurance are in line with their pre-pandemic trend in 2019, which economists describe as a period of labor market strength. The unemployment rate has also been below 4% for two years.
Indeed, when it comes to the average annual unemployment rate, 2023 was the sixth-best year on record, ranking only behind a few years in the 1950s and 1960s, said Julia Pollak, chief economist at ZipRecruiter.
“It’s still a very robust and resilient labor market overall,” Pollak said.

Outlook depends on your reference point

While the Glassdoor index shows deteriorating confidence, other measures signal a rosier view about the job market and U.S. economy.
For example, consumer sentiment jumped 13% in January to its highest level since July 2021, according to the University of Michigan. Similarly, a Conference Board poll also found that consumer optimism strengthened in December across all ages and household income levels.
Housing values and stock prices are at record highs and, in relative terms, “everyone’s got a job,” Zandi said.
More from Personal Finance:Why workers’ raises are smaller in 2024Workers are paying to get part of their paychecks earlyThe ‘haves and have nots’ of the job market
ZipRecruiter’s Job Seeker Confidence Index also rose in the last two quarters of 2023, though it remains below early 2022.
Overall worker sentiment likely depends on their reference point, Pollak said.
For example, if workers are comparing outcomes relative to what was expected to happen in 2023 — a year in which many economists had expected the U.S. to tip into recession — then the recent job market looks like “a miracle,” Pollak said.
However, workers are more apt to compare their current outlook to that of a year or two ago, a time when the job market was red hot and workers had record leverage to get better jobs and higher pay. Since then, “things have definitely cooled and slowed,” Pollak said.

The one ‘blemish’ in the U.S. economy

The Federal Reserve raised borrowing costs aggressively to cool the economy and labor market to ultimately tame persistently high inflation.
The inflation rate has decreased significantly from its pandemic-era peak. But the inflationary episode has left consumer costs noticeably more expensive, especially for staples such as food and rent, economists said.
“The only [economic] blemish — and it’s a big blemish — is prices are much higher than they were two to three years ago,” Zandi said.

Arrows pointing outwards

High pandemic-era inflation eroded buying power for the average person in consecutive months for more than two years. While wage growth was historically high, workers’ paychecks bought less.
But that trend has reversed: Wage growth now surpasses the rate of inflation for the average person, meaning workers’ paychecks are growing again relative to the things they buy. If that trend holds, consumer confidence should gradually rebound, Zandi said.Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

Too much choice can paralyze investors, causing inertia and other negative behaviors.
Choice overload is a behavioral finance concept that isn’t specific to investing. It can also occur when consumers buy food and apparel, for example.
Investors can overcome choice paralysis by making their decision as simple as possible. Target-date and balanced funds are good options, experts said.

Sdi Productions | E+ | Getty Images

Humans like choice. Indeed, it’s a bedrock principle of autonomy and freedom.
But when it comes to investing, having too many choices can be bad.

“Most likely, it will hurt you rather than help you,” said Philip Chao, a certified financial planner and founder of Experiential Wealth, based in Cabin John, Maryland.
The dominant view in economics is that more options are “unambiguously” good.
To that point, a “rich” environment of choice lets consumers “curate an experience tailored to their preferences,” wrote Brian Scholl, chief economist of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Office of the Investor Advocate.
However, in the real world, our experience diverges from this paradigm, he said.
Humans get overwhelmed by too many options, a behavioral finance concept known as “choice overload.”

Often, people — especially those new to something that carries high stakes — are fearful of making a bad choice or regretting their decision, said CFP David Blanchett, head of retirement research for PGIM, an investment manager.
This paradox of choice can have many negative impacts on investors: inertia, or doing nothing; naïve diversification, or spreading money across a little bit of everything; and favoring attention-grabbing investments, wrote Samantha Lamas, senior behavioral researcher at Morningstar.
“These shortcuts can become disastrous mistakes,” she said.

How investors encounter choice overload

Christopher Ames | E+ | Getty Images

It’s not just investing: The choice paradox can extend to things like ice cream flavors and apparel, for example.  
Among the early research experiments: buying gourmet jam at an upscale grocery store. According to that 2000 study, by Sheena Iyengar and Mark Lepper, a tasting booth with a large display of exotic jams (24 varieties) received more customer interest than a smaller one with six varieties. But customers who saw the small display were 10 times more likely to buy jam than those who saw the larger one.
Given these behavioral biases, retailers and others have evolved, making it less likely consumers will experience choice overload “in the wild” today, said Dan Egan, vice president of behavioral finance and investing at Betterment.
More from Personal Finance:A 12% retirement return assumption is ‘absolutely nuts’Why the ‘last mile’ of the inflation fight may be toughDon’t let this passport quirk upend your next vacation
However, let’s say an investor wants to save money in a taxable brokerage account or individual retirement account. They generally have hundreds or even thousands of options available from which to choose, and several characteristics to compare, such as cost and performance.
“There’s literally more choice than would ever be useful to you,” Egan said.
It’s a bit different in the context of 401(k) plans, experts said.

Do-it-yourselfers may have about one to two dozen investment options, at most, from which to choose, reducing the choice friction.
Further, most employers automatically enroll workers into a target-date fund, a one-stop shop for retirement savers that’s generally well diversified and appropriately allocated based on the investor’s age. This eliminates much of the decision-making.
If you don’t give people an easy choice, “it’s really hard for them,” Blanchett said.

Make it as simple as possible

Ultimately, long-term investors who are paralyzed by their available choices should make the process as simple as possible when starting out, experts said.
For most people, that’s likely to be investing in a well-diversified mutual fund like a target-date fund or a 60/40 balanced fund (which is allocated 60% to stocks and 40% to bonds), experts said.
“Either one of those [funds] is an excellent place to start as opposed to putting all money in cash or not investing,” Blanchett said.
Even within TDFs and balanced fund categories, there can be dozens of different options. Experts recommend seeking out a provider like Vanguard Group with relatively low costs. (You can do this by comparing the “expense ratios” of various funds.)
Here’s another approach: If you open a brokerage account at Vanguard, Fidelity or Charles Schwab, for example, use their respective TDFs or balanced portfolios, Blanchett said. In these cases, you’re offloading most of the investment decision-making to professional asset managers, and the large providers generally have high quality, he said.
“Is it necessary to buy all the ingredients to make a cake, or can you just buy a cake and eat it?” Chao said.
Don’t miss these stories from CNBC PRO: More

“Enough is enough,” declared a Hong Kong judge on January 29th of Evergrande, a failing Chinese property behemoth, and its two-year struggle to avoid repaying its creditors. In a landmark ruling, the court ordered a liquidation of the company, which, with more than $300bn in liabilities, is the world’s most indebted real-estate developer. A provisional liquidator will be appointed, assuming management of the company. Now foreign creditors must attempt to recoup their losses from a firm that holds most of its assets in mainland China. The ruling could pit Hong Kong’s courts against a Chinese government determined to restore public confidence to a struggling market.No firm has been more central to China’s property crisis, which kicked off when Evergrande first showed signs of weakening in mid-2021. Government rules meant to wean developers from debt eventually pushed the company to default later that year. Since then a majority of China’s listed property developers have either failed to pay their investors back or have been forced into restructuring. Their access to credit has been virtually cut off, causing builders to stop working on projects across the country. Prospective homebuyers have delayed purchases, leading to a 6.5% decline in the value of sales, year on year. This has unnerved a population that stores most of its wealth in property.Until relatively recently policymakers had hoped that a successful restructuring of Evergrande could pave the way for a slow but steady revitalisation of the market. Instead, Evergrande missed important deadlines for producing a restructuring plan and, when it did offer one, underwhelmed investors. Its proposal, which was panned by bondholders, involved giving creditors a stake in some of Evergrande’s other businesses, such as its electric-vehicle line. Far from restoring confidence, the battle became increasingly ugly. At one point a group of bondholders demanded that Hui Ka Yan, Evergrande’s chairman, put up $2bn of his own money. Mr Hui was later detained by Chinese authorities. His whereabouts are unknown.The housing crisis has drained global investors of confidence in Chinese policymaking. It is now doing similar damage to Hong Kong’s reputation. For decades, foreign investors have gained access to China through Hong Kong. One of Hong Kong’s distinct features has been a legal system, separate from China’s, that is based on common law. But court rulings in Hong Kong have no guarantee of being upheld in mainland China, where almost all of Evergrande’s assets are based.
The liquidator appointed by a Hong Kong court will be forced to deal with local authorities that may not recognise an order drawn up outside China’s legal system. Although a pilot project to recognise cross-border rulings was set up in 2021, qualification requirements are tough and the scheme is only recognised in a few cities. Hong Kong rulings can easily be shot down by mainland courts if they have the potential to disturb public order.Indeed, as Tommy Wu of Commerzbank, a German lender, has written, a full liquidation of Evergrande’s Chinese assets would probably send a shock through the Chinese economy. Property developers have sold many properties to ordinary Chinese folk that they have not yet provided. Investors’ claims on Evergrande’s projects or any cash holdings it still has could get in the way of their delivery. This would work against Beijing’s best efforts to restore confidence in the market. Any such activity would be viewed by policymakers as unacceptable, almost guaranteeing that the liquidation process will be long and drawn out.The latest Hong Kong ruling leaves room for restructuring, with the judge noting that Evergrande can still offer this to creditors. The company says that it aims to produce a new plan, possibly by March, and since a liquidator will be taking over negotiations there may now be a better chance of a deal. But it will not be one that includes many Chinese assets. And for a firm that mainly owns Chinese property, that is a problem. Evergrande’s liquidation marks a new low in China’s property crisis—it is far from the end of it. ■ More

Ukraine formally started the screening process to begin EU membership last week, and faces stringent conditions on addressing its historic corruption problem.
The Zelenskyy family income fell almost threefold between 2021 and 2022, according to the declaration on the presidential website.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy speaks with CNBC’s Andrew Ross Sorkin at the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in Davos, Switzerland on Jan. 16th, 2024.
Adam Galici | CNBC

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy published his income for the first time on Sunday as he looks to promote transparency and tackle corruption as part of the country’s push for EU membership.
Ukraine formally started the screening process to begin EU membership last week and faces stringent conditions on addressing its historic corruption problem.

The Zelenskyy family income fell almost threefold between 2021 and 2022, according to the declaration on the presidential website.
Zelenskyy and his family members received 10.8 million Ukrainian hryvnias ($286,168) in 2021, the year before Russia invaded Ukraine, which was down almost 12 million hryvnias from the previous year. The 2021 figure included around $142,000 in income from the sale of government bonds.
“Volodymyr Zelenskyy continues to own a number of trademarks. In particular, in 2021, the process of registering 22 trademarks, which began long before his election as President of Ukraine, was completed,” the president’s first-ever public declaration of income said.
In 2022, the Zelenskyy family income fell to 3.7 million hryvnias due to the “temporary termination of lease agreements on the territory of Ukraine as a result of the beginning of Russia’s full-scale aggression.”
The family’s cash balance at the end of 2022 dropped by almost 1.8 million hryvnias, the declaration said, while its asset, real estate and vehicle ownership was unchanged over the two years.

Zelenskyy has urged all public officials to disclose their incomes as part of a wider effort to promote transparency, and Ukraine’s National Agency on Corruption Prevention last month reopened a register on declared income to public scrutiny.
The U.S. and other allies supplying financial aid and weaponry, along with institutions such as the International Monetary Fund, have also sought assurances about Kyiv’s efforts to eradicate graft in public office.
The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) revealed on Saturday that it had uncovered a $40 million arms procurement corruption scheme after a two-year investigation.
Five employees from Ukrainian arms firm Lviv Arsenal allegedly conspired with Ministry of Defense officials to embezzle funds earmarked for the purchase of 100,000 mortar shells.
The SBU said five people had been charged and could face up to 12 years in jail if found guilty. More

The initial plan to put China Cinda Asset Management, China Orient Asset Management and China Great Wall Asset Management under the management of China Investment Corp would reportedly happen “in the near future,” Xinhua Finance had reported Sunday.
Beijing’s actions follow a stock market rout amid burgeoning financial risks stemming from a debt crisis in its real estate sector.

Multi exposure of virtual abstract financial graph interface on Chinese flag and sunset sky background, financial and trading concept
Igor Kutyaev | Istock | Getty Images

China state media removed a story that initially reported that Beijing plans to merge its largest state-owned bad debt asset managers with China Investment Corp, one of the world’s largest sovereign fund.
The initial report was published Sunday by Xinhua Finance.

It cited unidentified sources as saying the plan to bring China Cinda Asset Management, China Orient Asset Management and China Great Wall Asset Management under CIC could happen “in the near future” as part of a plan to reform institutions.
No other details were provided.
The original story in Chinese appears to have been subsequently removed from Xinhua’s website later Monday and is no longer available online. China Investment Corp did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.
This initial announcement, along with another by China’s securities regulator on Sunday that it’s suspending the lending of restricted shares starting Monday, underscores Beijing’s pledge last week to strengthen the “inherent stability” of its capital markets and improve market confidence.
Beijing’s actions follow a stock market rout amid burgeoning financial risks stemming from a debt crisis in its real estate sector. Last week, China’s central bank announced its largest cut in mandatory cash reserves for banks since 2021. It also announced a fresh policy mandate aimed at easing the cash crunch for Chinese developers.

The property market slumped after Beijing cracked down on developers’ high reliance on debt for growth in 2020, weighing on consumer growth and broader growth in the world’s second-largest economy.
China’s real estate troubles are closely intertwined with local government finances since they typically relied on land sales to developers for a significant portion of revenue.
— CNBC’s Evelyn Cheng contributed reporting to this story.

This story has been updated to reflect that the original Xinhua report is no longer available online. More