Finance

Price wars aside, Chinese electric car companies are now competing on driver-assist and other tech powered by semiconductors.
“It’s hard to point to your product being superior when your competitors use the exact same silicon to power their infotainment and intelligent driving systems,” said Tu Le, founder of consulting firm Sino Auto Insights.
Over the last few years, Nvidia has already built a $300 million business in automotive chips, with many of the major Chinese electric car companies as partners.

Shaoqing Ren, vice president, autonomous driving development, at Nio speaks about the electric company’s 5nm chip at its tech day in Shanghai on July 27, 2024.
CNBC | Evelyn Cheng

BEIJING — Chinese electric car companies that are already engaged in an intense price war are turning up the heat on another front: Chip-powered tech features such as the driver-assist function.
Nio and Xpeng have announced that their in-house designed auto chips are ready for production. So far, many of the major Chinese electric car makers have relied on Nvidia chips, with the company’s automotive chips business over the past few years bringing in more than $300 million in revenue a quarter.

“It’s hard to point to your product being superior when your competitors use the exact same silicon to power their infotainment and intelligent driving systems,” said Tu Le, founder of consulting firm Sino Auto Insights, explaining why EV makers are turning to in-house chips.
Le said he expected Tesla and Chinese electric car startups to compete on designing their own chips, while traditional automakers will likely still rely on Nvidia and Qualcomm “for the foreseeable future.”
Nvidia reported a 37% year-on-year increase in automotive segment revenue to $346 million in the latest quarter.
“Automotive was a key growth driver for the quarter as every auto maker developing autonomous vehicle technology is using NVIDIA in their Data Centers,” company management said on an earnings call, according to a FactSet transcript.

“I think the main reason why Chinese [automakers] pay attention [to] self-development system-on-chip is the success of Tesla in full-self driving,” said Alvin Liu, a Shanghai-based senior analyst for Canalys.

In 2019, Tesla reportedly shifted from Nvidia to its own chip for advanced driver-assist functions.
By designing their own chips, Chinese automakers can customize features, as well as reduce supply chain risk from geopolitical tensions, Liu said.
Liu does not expect significant impact to Nvidia in the short-term, however, as Chinese automakers will likely test new tech in small batches in the higher-end of the market.

Leveraging latest tech

Nio in late July said it had finished designing an automotive-grade chip, the NX9031, that uses a highly advanced 5 nanometer production technology.
“It is the first time that the five-nanometer process technology has been used in the Chinese automotive industry,” said Florence Zhang, consulting director at China Insights Consultancy, according to a CNBC translation of her Mandarin-language remarks. “It has broken through the bottleneck of domestic intelligent driving chip research and development.”
Nio, which had teased the chip in December, plans to use it in the high-end ET9 sedan, set for delivery in 2025.
The 5 nanometers technology is the most advanced one for autos because the 3 nanometer tech is mostly used for smartphone, personal computer and artificial intelligence-related applications, CLSA analyst Jason Tsang, said following the Nio chip announcement.
Xpeng at its event on Tuesday did not disclose the nanometer technology it was using for its Turing chip. The company’s driver-assist technology is widely considered one of the best currently available in China. 
While Xpeng revealed its chip on Tuesday, Brian Gu, Xpeng president, emphasized in a CNBC interview the day before that his company will primarily partner with Nvidia for chips.
The two companies have a close relationship, and Xpeng’s former head of autonomous driving joined Nvidia last year.
Giants in China’s electric car industry are also recognizing the importance of chips for autos.
If batteries were the foundation for the first phase of electric car development, semiconductors are the basis for the industry’s second phase, as it focuses on smart connected vehicles, BYD’s founder, Wang Chuanfu, said in April at a press conference held by Chinese driver-assist chip company Horizon Robotics.
Wang said more than 1 million BYD vehicles use Horizon Robotics chips.
BYD on Tuesday announced its Fang Cheng Bao off-road vehicle brand would use Huawei’s driver-assist system.
U.S. restrictions on Nvidia chip sales to China haven’t directly affected automakers since the cars haven’t required the most advanced semiconductor technology so far.
But with increasing focus on driver-assist tech, which relies more on artificial intelligence — a segment at the center of U.S.-China tech competition — Chinese automakers are turning to in-house tech.
Looking ahead to the next decade, Xpeng Founder He Xiaopeng said Tuesday the company plans to become a global artificial intelligence car company.
When asked about the availability of computing power for training driver-assist tech, Xpeng’s Gu told reporters Monday that prior to the U.S. restrictions the company had been working with Alibaba Cloud. He claimed that access now probably gives Xpeng the largest cloud computing capacity among all car manufacturers in China.

Creating new tech and standards

Government incentives, from subsidies to support for building out a battery charging network, have helped electric cars take off in China, the world’s largest auto market.
In July, penetration of new energy vehicles, which includes battery-only and hybrid-powered cars, exceeded 50% of new passenger cars sold in China for the first time, according to industry data.
That scale means that companies involved in the country’s electric car development are also contributing to new standards on tech for cars, such as removing the need for a physical key to unlock the door. Instead, drivers can use a smartphone app.
How that app or device securely connects drivers to their cars is part of the forthcoming set of standards that the California-based Car Connectivity Consortium is working on, according to president Alysia Johnson.
A quarter of the organization’s members are based in China, including Nio, BYD, Zeekr and Huawei. Apple, Google and Samsung are also members, Johnson revealed.
She said the organization is looking to enable a driver of a Nio car that uses a Huawei phone to securely send the car “key” to a partner who uses an Apple phone and drives a Zeekr car, for example.
“Digital key tech is becoming a lot more accessible than people would think,” she said. More

Warren Buffett tours the grounds at the Berkshire Hathaway Annual Shareholders Meeting in Omaha Nebraska.
David A. Grogan | CNBC

Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway reached a $1 trillion market capitalization on Wednesday, the first nontechnology company in the U.S. to score the coveted milestone.
Shares of the Omaha, Nebraska-based conglomerate have rallied more than 28% in 2024, far above the S&P 500’s 18% gain. The $1 trillion threshold was crossed just two days before the “Oracle of Omaha” turns 94 years old.

The shares were up 0.8% to $696,502.02 on Wednesday, allowing it to top the $1 trillion mark, per FactSet.
The milestone “is a testament to the firm’s financial strength and franchise value,” said Cathy Seifert, Berkshire analyst at CFRA Research. “This is significant at a time when Berkshire represents one of the few remaining conglomerates in existence today.”
Unlike the six other companies in the trillion-dollar club (Apple, Nvidia, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon and Meta), Berkshire is known for its old-economy focus as the owner of BNSF Railway, Geico Insurance and Dairy Queen. (Although its sizable Apple position has helped drive recent gains.)
Buffett, chairman and CEO, took control of Berkshire, a struggling textile business, in the 1960s and transformed the company into a sprawling empire that encompasses insurance, railroad, retail, manufacturing and energy with an unmatched balance sheet and cash fortress.
“It’s a tribute to Mr. Buffet and his management team, as ‘old economy’ businesses … are what built Berkshire. Yet, these businesses trade at relatively much lower valuations, versus tech companies which are not a major part of Berkshire’s business mix,” said Andrew Kligerman, TD Cowen’s Berkshire analyst. “Moreover, Berkshire has achieved this through a conglomerate structure, a model that many view as ‘archaic,’ as corporations have increasingly moved to specialization over the decades.”

Stock chart icon

Berkshire Hathaway

Greg Abel, vice chairman of Berkshire’s non-insurance operations, has been named Buffett’s successor. At this year’s annual meeting, Buffett told shareholders that Abel, 62, will have the final say on Berkshire’s investing decisions when he’s no longer at the helm.
Selling spree
Buffett has been in a defensive mode as of late, dumping a massive amount of stock, including half of his Apple stake, while raising Berkshire’s cash pile to a record $277 billion at the end of June.
While Buffett famously never times the market and advises others to not try to either, these recent moves served as a wake-up call to some of his followers on Wall Street, who believe he saw some things he did not like about the economy and market valuation.
Berkshire invests the majority of its cash in short-term Treasury bills, and its holding in such securities — valued at $234.6 billion at the end of the second quarter — has exceeded the amount the U.S. Federal Reserve owns.
So it’s hard to judge why investors are rewarding Berkshire with the $1 trillion crown today, whether it’s a bet on the American economy and Buffett’s sprawling group of businesses poised to benefit if it keeps chugging along or whether they see Berkshire as a cash fortress that will generate steady income in the face of an uncertain macro environment.
The conglomerate also started a selling spree of Bank of America shares in mid-July, dumping more than $5 billion worth of the bank stock. Buffett bought BofA’s preferred stock and warrants in 2011 in the aftermath of the financial crisis, shoring up confidence in the embattled lender struggling with losses tied to subprime mortgages.
Strong earnings
After Berkshire’s latest strong second-quarter earnings, UBS analyst Brian Meredith increased his 2024 and 2025 earnings estimates because of two factors: higher investing income and higher underwriting results at the insurance group including Geico. Insurance stocks have been on a tear this year as the group continues to raise prices coming out of the pandemic.
Meredith sees Berkshire’s market value rising far above $1 trillion, raising his 12-month price target to $759,000 for the A shares, almost 9% higher than Wednesday’s level.
“We continue to believe BRK’s shares are an attractive play in an uncertain macro environment,” he wrote in the note earlier this month.
High price tag
Berkshire’s original Class A shares carry one of the highest price tags on Wall Street. Today, each one sells for 68% more than the median price of a home in the U.S. 

Stock chart icon

Berkshire Hathaway A shares, long term

That’s because Buffett has never split the stock, contending that the high share price attracts and retains more long-term, quality-oriented investors. The Benjamin Graham protégé has said that many Berkshire shareholders use their stock as a savings account.
Still, Berkshire issued Class B shares in 1996 at a price equal to one-thirtieth of a Class A share to cater to smaller investors wanting a small piece of the Buffett’s performance.

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

401(k) plan policies like auto-enrollment and auto-escalation have become popular.
They aim to boost workers’ retirement savings.
Pioneering researchers found that the policies may be less effective than they’d previously thought. However, the effects are still positive, they said.

Images By Tang Ming Tung | Digitalvision | Getty Images

Employers are increasingly putting workers’ 401(k) plan savings on autopilot.
But the positive impact of automated retirement savings is more muted than initially thought, new research finds.

Previously “underexamined” factors — like workers cashing out 401(k) balances when they leave a job — “meaningfully reduce” the long-term impact of policies like automatic enrollment and automatic escalation, according to a new paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research.
Importantly, some of the paper’s co-authors — James Choi of Yale University, and David Laibson and John Beshears of Harvard University — are behavioral economists who pioneered early research into the positive effects of automatic enrollment.
“They are like the OGs [originals],” said David Blanchett, head of retirement research at PGIM, an investment manager. “These are the people who’ve been doing research on this topic now for decades.”

‘Not as positive as we had previously thought’

Automated savings has been a cornerstone of 401(k) policy since Congress passed the Pension Protection Act of 2006.
Policies like auto-enrollment and auto-escalation aim to boost the size of employees’ nest eggs, by automatically enrolling workers in their company 401(k) and then raising (or “escalating”) their savings rate over time.

In this way, people’s tendency towards inertia works in their favor.

About two-thirds of 401(k) plans were using auto-enrollment as of 2022, according to survey data from the Plan Sponsor Council of America, a trade group. Of them, 78% used auto-escalation.
Overall, their effect on savings is positive, “just not as positive as we had previously thought based on the research we had done before,” Choi said in an interview.
The group’s initial research didn’t track results for workers who left jobs where they’d been automatically enrolled.
This research update sought to do a broader analysis, incorporating factors like job turnover, Choi said.
More from Personal Finance:You may be paying fees for cash back at retailersWhy some young adults are disconnected from the job marketThe benefits of giving to a 529 college savings plan
Overall, Choi and his co-authors recently found that auto-enrollment raised average 401(k) contribution rates by 0.6 percentage points of income over workers’ careers.
That’s a 72% decrease in effectiveness from the 2.2-percentage-point boost that was extrapolated by the “results of early pioneering papers,” the paper said.
“You’re talking 1.6% of income less saved per year,” Choi said. “If you were to just add that up over a 40-year career, you’re talking more than a half year of income saved.”
When also accounting for compounding interest on those savings, it can amount to a “quite substantial” financial difference, he added.

The impact of 401(k) leakage

The disparity is largely a function of so-called “leakage” from 401(k) plans. meaning the early withdrawal of funds before retirement.
About 40% of workers who leave a job cash out their 401(k) plans each year, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute. Such leakage amounted to $92.4 billion in 2015, according to EBRI’s most recent data.
Workers may withdraw 401(k) plan funds before their employer match is fully vested, meaning they’d forgo that free money.

Additionally, just 43% of workers defaulted into auto-escalation of their savings rates ultimately accepted a higher contribution rate after one year, the National Bureau of Economic Research paper found.
By comparison, early research conducted by behavioral economists like Richard Thaler and Shlomo Benartzi estimated that share around 85%.
Job turnover also complicates auto-escalation in addition to auto-enrollment, PGIM’s Blanchett said.
For example, a worker’s escalated contribution rate may reset at a lower savings rate if they were to join a new employer’s 401(k) plan.
While auto-escalation isn’t necessarily a reliable way to get people to save more money, auto-enrollment has proven “very successful,” Blanchett said.

He believes the effectiveness of auto-enrollment shouldn’t be judged based on 401(k) leakage, which is a separate policy issue, he said.
“I think auto-enrollment does a spectacular job at getting individuals in the plan,” Blanchett said. “But we still have this massive leakage issue. It still exists whether you have auto-enrollment or you don’t.”
That said, there’s room for improvement with automated savings.
“I’d like us to get to a point where 7% or 8% is the median default savings rate,” Blanchett said.
When coupled with an employer match, the typical worker would be saving 10% or more of their salaries, a bar workers should generally strive for, he said. More

Vladimir Putin is spending big on his war in Ukraine. The Russian president has disbursed over $200bn, or 10% of GDP, on the invasion, according to America’s Department of Defence. He now plans to invest heavily in infrastructure that will enable his country’s economy to flourish even while cut off from the West. Over the next decade, the Russian state expects to funnel $70bn into construction of transport routes to connect the country to important trade partners in Asia and the Middle East. Russia’s far east and high north will receive the lion’s share. A smaller sum will go on the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC), a project designed to link Russia and the Indian Ocean via Iran. Officials promise growth in traffic along all non-Western trade routes. More

U.S. government researchers recently visited a South Korean mine to assess progress towards boosting supply of a critical metal called tungsten from areas outside China, the mine operator said Wednesday.
The Sangdong Mine, owned by a subsidiary of Canada-based Almonty Industries, is set to resume operations this year.
With China dominating over 80% of the metal’s supply chain, Almonty claims the mine could potentially produce 50% of the rest of the world’s supply of tungsten — an extremely hard metal used for making weapons, semiconductors and industrial cutting machines.

Workers in July 2019 expand a mine in Germany intended to increase supplies of tungsten and fluorspar. 
Picture Alliance | Picture Alliance | Getty Images

BEIJING — U.S. government researchers recently visited a South Korean mine to assess progress towards boosting supply of a critical metal called tungsten from areas outside China, the mine operator said Wednesday.
The Sangdong Mine, owned by a subsidiary of Canada-based Almonty Industries, is set to resume operations this year. Tungsten is an extremely hard metal used for making weapons, semiconductors and industrial cutting machines.

With China dominating over 80% of the metal’s supply chain, Almonty claims the mine could potentially produce 50% of the rest of the world’s tungsten supply.
The U.S. has not commercially mined tungsten since 2015, according to the latest annual report from the U.S. Geological Survey, a government agency that analyzes the availability of natural resources.
Four mineral resource scholars visited the Sangdong Mine in a trip led by Sean Xun, assistant chief at the agency’s National Minerals Information Center, the report said.
The U.S. Geological Survey would make a “significant update” on its assessment of the mine in its 2025 report due out in the first three months of next year, it added.

The agency did not immediately respond to a request for comment made outside of U.S. business hours.

The Biden administration has identified critical minerals and announced tariffs on tungsten and others as part of a broader effort to bolster national security.
“Of the 35 mineral commodities deemed critical by the Department of the Interior, the United States was 100 percent reliant on foreign sources for 13 in 2019,” according to the U.S. Geological Survey.
Almonty has said it’s spending at least $125 million to reopen the Sangdong Mine, which closed in the 1990s.
China, in the past year and a half, has started to use its leverage in parts of the global critical mineral supply chain to control exports.
Beijing has so far avoided any restrictions on tungsten. But forthcoming rules to limit exports of a similar metal called antimony have raised expectations that tungsten will soon be subject to more Chinese export restrictions.
“If Donald Trump wins the US presidency and follows through on his threat to dramatically hike tariffs on China, Beijing might respond with new export controls on critical minerals or deploy existing controls more forcefully,” Gabriel Wildau, managing director at consulting firm Teneo, said in a note Tuesday.
“Chinese regulators may also apply controls selectively, denying minerals to specific foreign companies that are viewed as supporting Washington’s technological containment agenda.”
He added that the U.S. Energy Department has already awarded $151 million in grants to encourage domestic mining and processing of critical minerals, and western nations are expected to respond to Beijing’s “calibrated weaponization of critical minerals by accelerating efforts to reduce dependence on China.” More

Shares of JD.com inched up about 1.2%, outperforming the Hang Seng Index’s decline of 0.82% on Wednesday.
The announcement is JD.com’s second buyback this year, after announcing a $3 billion buyback in March.

JD.com set up an Innovative Retail division that houses its grocery business 7Fresh.
Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Hong Kong-listed shares of Chinese online retailer JD.com climbed 1.2% on Wednesday, outperforming the decline on the Hang Seng index after the firm announced a $5 billion buyback late Tuesday.
U.S. listed shares of the firm rose 2.24% on Tuesday after the announcement. Both JD.com’s Hong Kong and U.S. shares have dropped about 20% year to date.

In comparison, Hong Kong’s benchmark Hang Seng index was down about 0.82% Wednesday, but is up about 4% for the year so far.

Stock chart icon

The announcement is JD.com’s second buyback this year, after announcing a $3 billion buyback in March.
In response to the move, Chelsey Tam, senior equity analyst at Morningstar, said that the decision to announce the share buyback is “not surprising.” She explained, “It is a common theme in China when share prices and growth are low.”
Tam also pointed to Vipshop, another Chinese e-commerce player that has increased its own share buyback program last week.
China’s e-commerce sector has been dogged by a slow domestic economy.

Earlier this month, Alibaba’s second-quarter results missed expectations on both the top and bottom lines. On Monday, Temu-owner Pinduoduo saw its worst ever session after its second-quarter results missed both revenue and earnings per share expectations.
Back in February, Alibaba announced a $25 billion share buyback after it missed revenue targets for the fourth quarter of 2023. More

Xpeng shares rose after the Chinese electric car company said prices for its new mass-market Mona brand would start as low as $16,812, far below that of Tesla’s Model 3.
The Chinese automaker said orders for the Mona M03 electric coupe exceeded 10,000 just 52 minutes after the car’s formal launch Tuesday evening in Beijing.
Xpeng shares remain more than 45% lower for the year so far.

He Xiaopeng, founder of Chinese EV company Xpeng, said on Aug. 27 that the startup’s next ten years will focus on integrating artificial intelligence.
CNBC | Evelyn Cheng

BEIJING — Xpeng shares rose after the Chinese electric car company launched its new mass-market Mona brand on Tuesday with prices starting as low as $16,812, far below that of Tesla’s Model 3.
The Chinese automaker said orders for the Mona M03 electric coupe exceeded 10,000 just 52 minutes after the car’s formal launch in Beijing.

Xpeng’s U.S.-listed shares closed up 6.5% in New York trading on Tuesday, while its Hong Kong-traded shares rose nearly 2% early Wednesday morning.
“With cars priced under $20,000, China is further cementing its new position as the world center for automotive manufacturing,” Michael Dunne, founder and CEO of consulting firm Dunne Insights, said Wednesday on CNBC’s “Squawk Box Asia.”
“China can produce cars more cheaply than anyone else in the world,” he said.

Stock chart icon

Xpeng shares extended gains from Monday after a filing showed the company’s founder and CEO, He Xiaopeng, bought at least 1 million shares each of the company’s stock traded in the U.S. and Hong Kong.
The total U.S. purchase was worth nearly $10 million, according to the filing, giving He about 18.8% of the company’s total issued share capital.

Xpeng shares have lost more than 45% so far this year.
Tesla shares closed nearly 2% lower on Tuesday. Shares of Chinese electric car companies Zeekr and Li Auto rose, while those of Nio closed mildly lower.
— CNBC’s Sheila Chiang contributed to this report. More

Dollar General, Dollar Tree and Kroger have charged customers who ask for cash back in recent years.
Their cash-back fees amount to more than $90 million a year, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau reports.
Such fees may disadvantage those in banking deserts, where they don’t have easy access to cash for free. Retailers say they offer a lifeline to such consumers, who may not otherwise be able to get cash.

A Dollar General store in Germantown, New York, on Nov. 30, 2023.
Angus Mordant/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Three of the nation’s largest retailers — Dollar General, Dollar Tree and Kroger — charge fees to customers who ask for “cash back” at check-out, amounting to more than $90 million a year, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Many retailers offer a cash-back option to consumers who pay for purchases with a debit or pre-paid card.

But levying a fee for the service may be “exploiting” certain customers, especially those who live in so-called banking deserts without easy access to a bank branch or free cash withdrawals, according to a CFPB analysis issued Tuesday.
That dynamic tends to disproportionately impact rural communities, lower earners and people of color, CFPB said.
Not all retailers charge cash-back fees, which can range from $0.50 to upwards of $3 per transaction, according to the agency, which has cracked down on financial institutions in recent years for charging so-called “junk fees.”
More from Personal Finance:The IRS method of ‘last resort’ to collect overdue taxesHow investors can prepare for lower interest ratesWhy remote work has staying power
Five of the eight companies that the CFPB sampled offer cash back for free.

They include Albertsons, a grocer; the drugstore chains CVS and Walgreens; and discount retailers Target and Walmart. (Kroger proposed a $25 billion merger with Albertsons in 2022, but that deal is pending in court.)
“Fees to get cash back are just one more nickel and dime that all starts to add up,” said Adam Rust, director of financial services at the Consumer Federation of America, an advocacy group.
“It just makes it harder and harder to get by,” he said. “It’s thousands of little cuts at a time.”

Luis Alvarez | Digitalvision | Getty Images

A spokesperson for Dollar General said cash back can help save customers money relative to “alternative, non-retail options” like check cashing or ATM fees.
“While not a financial institution, Dollar General provides cashback options at our more than 20,000 stores across the country as a service to customers who may not have convenient access to their primary financial institution,” the spokesperson said.
Spokespeople for Kroger and Dollar Tree (which operates Family Dollar and Dollar Tree stores) didn’t respond to requests for comment from CNBC.
Kroger, Dollar General and Dollar Tree were respectively the No. 4, 17 and 19 largest U.S. retailers by sales in 2023, according to the National Retail Federation, a trade group.

Cash back is popular

The practice of charging for cash back is relatively new, Rust explained.
For example, in 2019, Kroger Co. rolled out a $0.50 fee on cash back of $100 or less and $3.50 for amounts between $100 and $300, according to CFPB.
This applied across brands like Kroger, Fred Meyers, Ralph’s, QFC and Pick ‘N Save, among others.
However, Kroger Co. began charging for cash back at its Harris Teeter brand in January 2024: $0.75 for amounts of $100 or less and $3 for larger amounts up to $200, CFPB said.

Cash withdrawals from retail locations is the second most popular way to access cash, representing 17% of transactions over 2017-22, according to a CFPB analysis of the Diary and Survey of Consumer Payment Choice.
ATMs were the most popular, at 61%.
But there are some key differences between retail and ATM withdrawals, according to CFPB and consumer advocates.
For instance, relatively low caps on cash-back amounts make it challenging to limit the impact of fees by spreading them over larger withdrawals, they said.
The average retail cash withdrawal was $34 from 2017-22, while it was $126 at ATMs, CFPB said.

Banking deserts are growing

However, retailers may be the only reasonable way to get cash for consumers who live in banking deserts, experts say.
More than 12 million people — about 3.8% of the U.S. population — lived in a banking desert in 2023, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
That figure is up from 11.5 million, or 3.5% of the population, in 2019, it found.
Generally speaking, a banking desert constitutes any geographic area without a local bank branch. Such people don’t live within 10 miles of a physical bank branch. The rise of digital banking, accelerated by the Covid-19 pandemic, has led many banks to close their brick-and-mortar store fronts, according to Lali Shaffer, a payments risk expert at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
These deserts “may hurt vulnerable populations” who are already less likely to have access to online and mobile banking, she wrote recently.

Retailers blame banks

Retail advocates say banks are to blame for cash-back fees.
Merchants must pay fees to banks whenever customers swipe a debit card or credit card for purchases. Those fees might be 2% to 4% of a transaction, for example.
Since cash-back totals are included in the total transaction price, merchants also pay fees to banks on any cash that consumers request.

The “vast majority” of retailers don’t charge for cash back, and therefore take a financial loss to offer this service to customers for free, said Doug Kantor, general counsel at the National Association of Convenience Stores and a member of the Merchants Payments Coalition Executive Committee.
“Banks have abandoned many of these communities and they’re gouging retailers just for taking people’s cards or giving people cash,” he said.
But consumer advocates say this calculus overlooks the benefit that retailers get by offering cash back,
“You’d think they’d see this as a free way to get customers: coming into [the] store because the bank branch isn’t there,” Rust said. “Instead they’re going ahead and charging another junk fee.” More