More stories

  • in

    Bank of America fined $150 million for consumer abuses including fake accounts, bogus fees

    Bank of America engaged in deceptive practices that hurt hundreds of thousands of its customers in recent years, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau said Tuesday.
    The bank charged multiple $35 overdraft fees for the same transaction, failed to properly issue rewards to credit card users and signed up customers for card accounts without their consent, the CFPB said in a statement.
    The company has to pay $150 million in fines, as well as about $80.4 million to customers who were unfairly charged bogus fees, on top of the $23 million it already paid to customers who were improperly denied card awards.

    A man walks past an ATM outside Bank of America Corp. headquarters in Charlotte, North Carolina, May 2, 2016.
    Chris Keane | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    Bank of America, the second-largest U.S. bank by assets, engaged in deceptive practices that hurt hundreds of thousands of its customers in recent years, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau said Tuesday.
    The bank charged multiple $35 overdraft fees for the same transaction, failed to properly issue rewards to credit card users and signed up customers for card accounts without their consent, the CFPB said in a statement.

    Charlotte, North Carolina-based Bank of America was ordered to pay a total of $150 million in penalties to the CFPB and another regulator, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. It also has to pay about $80.4 million to customers who were unfairly charged bogus fees, on top of the $23 million it already paid to customers who were improperly denied card awards.
    “These practices are illegal and undermine customer trust,” CFPB Director Rohit Chopra said in the release. “The CFPB will be putting an end to these practices across the banking system.”
    Bank of America spokesman Bill Halldin said in a response the lender “voluntarily reduced overdraft fees and eliminated all non-sufficient fund fees in the first half of 2022,” resulting in a 90% drop in revenue from those fees.
    The announcement Tuesday is the latest sign that some of the practices exposed by the Wells Fargo fake accounts scandal in 2016 weren’t confined to that bank.
    Regulators have punished Wells Fargo for a sales culture that led to the creation of 3.5 million fake accounts. But other lenders have had similar lapses, including U.S. Bank, which paid a $37.5 million fine last year for putting customers into unauthorized accounts. More

  • in

    Berkshire Hathaway takes control of LNG facility as Buffett ups bet on energy infrastructure

    Warren Buffett ahead of the Berkshire Hathaway Annual Shareholder’s Meeting in Omaha, NE.
    David A. Grogan | CNBC

    Berkshire Hathaway Energy has agreed to purchase a 50% stake in the Cove Point liquefied natural gas facility for $3.3 billion in cash.
    Warren Buffett’s big energy and utility division bought the stake from Dominion Energy and will now own a 75% limited partnership stake in Cove Point LNG located in Lusby, Maryland. A subsidiary of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners holds the remaining 25% .

    While the deal, which was announced Monday, isn’t large in size for Berkshire, it builds on a growing bet on energy infrastructure at the conglomerate as it gains control of one of the rare functional facilities in the U.S. that can export LNG.
    “It builds on their long-term theme of energy resources becoming more valuable and ownership of one of only a few US LNG exporters,” said Bill Stone, chief investment officer at Glenview Trust and a Berkshire shareholder.
    The Cove Point LNG Terminal has a storage capacity of 14.6 billion cubic feet and a daily send-out capacity of 1.8 billion cubic feet. The firm has a long-term contract with Sumitomo Corp., a Japanese trading company that Buffett also invested in.
    Berkshire Hathaway first bought a stake in Dominion’s gas pipeline and storage assets for $4 billion in 2020. Greg Abel, Berkshire Hathaway Energy’s chairman and former CEO, previously told CNBC the deal in 2020 was made through a strong relationship he had with the prior Dominion CEO Tom Farrell.
    Abel is now vice chairman for noninsurance operations at Berkshire Hathaway and the successor to the 92-year-old “Oracle of Omaha.” Buffett said Abel has taken on many of the responsibilities at the conglomerate.

    In 2022, Berkshire proposed spending nearly $4 billion to help generate more wind and solar power in Iowa. At the same time, the conglomerate has been dramatically increasing its exposure to two traditional energy companies — Occidental Petroleum and Chevron. 
    “Buffett has liked pipelines for a long time, given their toll bridge-type revenues rather than pure commodity exposure, and this is likely similar,” Stone said. “Natural gas prices are down a ton, but I think most of these exporters work on long-term take or pay contracts.”
    Natural gas futures have fallen more than 40% this year to $2.709 per million British thermal units. More

  • in

    Stocks making the biggest premarket moves: JetBlue, Zillow, JPMorgan Chase, 3M and more

    JetBlue Airways Airbus A320-200 aircraft as seen on final approach landing at New York John F. Kennedy International Airport in USA.
    Nicola Economou | NurPhoto | Getty Images

    Check out the companies making the biggest moves in premarket trading:
    JetBlue Airways — JetBlue Airways lost nearly 2% after Evercore ISI downgraded the airline to underweight, citing the recent sharp rally in shares and balance sheet concerns.

    Zillow Group — The stock popped 4.7% after being upgraded by Piper Sandler to overweight from neutral. Analyst Thomas Champion also hiked his price target to $62 per share, suggesting 33% upside from Monday’s close. Product optionality and new initiatives, as well sequential improvements in the housing macro environment were among the reasons for his call.
    JPMorgan Chase — The Wall Street heavyweight added 1.2% in premarket trading after an upgrade from Jefferies to buy from hold on Tuesday. The firm also labeled JPMorgan Chase as “best-in-class.”
    U.S. Bancorp — Shares of the Minnesota-based bank gained 2.2% following an upgrade to buy from neutral by Bank of America. Analyst Ebrahim Poonawala said U.S. Bancorp is among the highest quality franchises in the U.S. banking industry, with its scale, earnings and strong execution expected to drive superior earnings growth and stock outperformance.
    Amazon — Shares ticked 0.8% higher as the e-commerce giant kicked off its highly anticipated Prime Day summer sale, which goes through Wednesday. Wells Fargo also added Amazon to its Signature Picks list, citing better expectations for Amazon Web Services, Prime Day revenue growth and a risk-reward that is still favorable.
    WD-40 — Shares jumped more than 5% after the lubricant and rust-remover maker reported fiscal third-quarter results postmarket Monday. WD-40 posted $141.7 million in total net sales, a 15% increase from the prior year.

    3M — Shares rose nearly 2% in premarket trading following an upgrade to neutral from underperform by Bank of America. The bank said 3M has positive catalysts ahead related to litigation settlements, restructuring and the planned spin-off for the health care business.
    Zions Bancorp, Truist — The bank stocks were under pressure Tuesday morning after Jefferies downgraded both Zions and Truist to hold from buy, lowering its earnings estimates for the two companies. Shares of Zions fell 1.5% in premarket trading, while Truist’s were down 1%.
    Iovance Biotherapeutics — Iovance Biotherapeutics fell more than 11%. The biotech company on Monday said the pricing of its underwritten public offering, of 20 million shares of common stock, would be at $7.50 per share. The gross proceeds from the offering are set to be about $150 million.
    — CNBC’s Jesse Pound, Alex Harring, Samantha Subin, Brian Evans, Sarah Min and Michael Bloom contributed reporting. More

  • in

    India’s IDFC First Bank says merger will boost credit growth

    India’s IDFC First Bank expects to see robust credit growth following its recent merger, according to managing director and CEO V. Vaidyanathan. 
    Last week, IDFC First Bank said its board had approved its merger with IDFC Ltd., the latest in a wave of consolidation in India’s financial sector.
    This comes just days after a $40 billion mega merger between India’s largest private lender HDFC Bank  with Housing Development Finance Corporation, the country’s biggest mortgage lender.

    IDFC First bank signage is seen outside a branch in Mumbai, India, 04 July, 2023. IDFC First Bank merges with IDFC Limited. 155 shares of IDFC First Bank will be alloted for 100 shares of IDFC according to an Indian media report.
    Nurphoto | Nurphoto | Getty Images

    India’s IDFC First Bank expects to see robust credit growth following its recent merger, according to managing director and CEO V. Vaidyanathan. 
    Last week, IDFC First Bank said its board had approved its merger with IDFC Ltd., the latest in a wave of consolidation in India’s financial sector.

    This comes just days after a $40 billion mega merger between India’s largest private lender HDFC Bank  with Housing Development Finance Corporation, the country’s biggest mortgage lender.
    Vaidyanathan said, as a country, India is on a “massive trajectory,” which holds immense growth potential for the merged entity in the near term. 
    “We are insiders of this country and we can see for ourselves on day-to-day basis how the country is growing,” he told CNBC’s “Street Signs Asia” on Tuesday.
    “For India’s credit market, let me say about a 15% credit growth would be a fair expectation in the near future. And for our bank, a 25% credit growth would be a fair expectation with stable asset quality.”

    Last week, IDFC First Bank said the proposed merger would boost the bank’s standalone book value by 4.9% compared with its financials as of March 31. It also said it aims to increase its balance sheet by 20% to 25% per year in the near to medium term.

    “The merger will lead to simplification of the corporate structure of IDFC FHCL, IDFC Limited and IDFC FIRST Bank by consolidating them into a single entity and will help streamline the regulatory compliances of the aforesaid entities,” the release added. 
    Vaidyanathan noted the bank has key “strategic goals” and since the “Indian market is so large and wide and we’re still a tiny player, we think that we can grow at a good rate for a long time to come with a holding like this.”
    Still, the deal is subject to approvals from India’s key regulatory authorities, including the Reserve Bank of India, Securities and Exchange Board of India and India’s stock exchanges.
    Analysts have noted the recent merger will not dent IDFC First Bank’s prospects for inclusion in the MSCI standard index for August.
    Inclusion in the index “would be a big deal,” said Vaidyanathan. “Whether we make it now or later in our mind, we have no doubt. We are very confident and frankly, it’d be an honor to be part of MSCI index for us,” added the CEO. More

  • in

    China has a new foreign relations law. Here’s what it means for business

    Two new laws, one on espionage and the other on foreign relations, took effect July 1.
    In strictly legal terms, the legislative changes don’t increase the risk for foreign businesses in China, said Jeremy Daum, senior fellow at Yale Law School’s Paul Tsai China Center.
    “The current environment lends itself to more occasions where a regulator or someone in the government in China may choose to take action that is non-transparent. That creates a risk for U.S. business,” said Michael House, partner at Perkins Coie.

    New Chinese laws on espionage and foreign relations took effect on July 1.
    Vcg | Visual China Group | Getty Images

    BEIJING — For foreign businesses in China, geopolitics hold more sway than new Chinese laws, according to analysts.
    National security is a growing priority for the country. Two new laws, one on espionage and the other on foreign relations, took effect July 1. They contain catch-all phrases such as “state secrets” that are open to interpretation by local and central authorities.

    Adding to the worries of those considering doing business in China is news earlier this year of three raids on international consulting firms with little public explanation.
    In strictly legal terms, however, the legislative changes themselves don’t increase the risk for foreign businesses in China, said Jeremy Daum, senior fellow at Yale Law School’s Paul Tsai China Center.
    Rather, he said, “the current international relations climate and competing political pressures may be making some businesses re-evaluate their cost-benefit analysis in accepting the risks of doing business in China.”

    U.S.-China relations have deteriorated over the last several years, after decades of increased engagement.
    High-level dialogue beyond the presidential level has only resumed partially this year with U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s visit to Beijing, among others.

    “The current environment lends itself to more occasions where a regulator or someone in the government in China may choose to take action that is non-transparent. That creates a risk for U.S. business,” said Michael House, partner at Perkins Coie and based out of offices in Beijing and Washington, D.C.
    “And when there is no real opportunity for the two governments to talk about the reason for that action or at the government level try to get some better read on what’s motivated those kinds of actions, that becomes then detrimental for U.S. business when that kind of opportunity doesn’t exist,” House said.
    When it comes to industries, he pointed out, advanced technology and its links to the military are a concern to the U.S. and China, while other sectors bear less risk.

    The new laws

    The new Espionage Law expands the “acts of espionage” definition to include “seeking to align with an espionage organization” and attempts to illegally obtain data related to national security, according to an English-language translation on China Law Translate, a website Daum founded.
    The law also calls on “all levels” of government in China to educate and manage related security precautions, according to the translation.
    The website’s translation of the Foreign Relations Law notes that foreign organizations in China “must not endanger China’s national security, harm the societal public interest, or undermine societal public order.”

    Corporate disconnect

    The Chinese approach [to national security] is more defensive and domestic while the U.S. understandings are very global.

    Alex Liang
    Anjie & Broad, partner

    Michael Hart, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in China, said he’s brought up the corporate raids in his meetings with Chinese officials.
    “This is one of the disconnects where we usually hear, is as long as you’re not doing anything illegal you have nothing to worry about,” Hart said. “But it’s unclear to us what these companies did that was considered illegal. We continue to call for more transparency.”
    Blinken and U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen have both met with U.S. businesses in China during their visits this year.
    Companies also face increased scrutiny on the U.S. side. A House committee delegation discussed China business in their meeting with executives of high-profile U.S. tech and media companies in California in April.

    National security

    The term national security has been increasingly cited by the U.S. and Chinese government in new restrictions for businesses over the last few years.
    For businesses in China, the biggest concern is that everything from food to energy is given a security angle, Jens Eskelund, president of the EU Chamber of Commerce in China, said at a briefing in mid-June.
    “That I think creates uncertainty about what are the exact borders between what falls under a security purview and something we can operate as normal businesses.”
    Cultural and language differences also play a role.
    “The Chinese approach [to national security] is more defensive and domestic while the U.S. understandings are very global,” said Alex Liang, partner at Anjie & Broad in Beijing.
    “For example, China generally focuses on whether sensitive information is leaked across the border, while U.S. normally focuses whether its allies provide technology to its rivalries and certain target nations,” he said.

    Read more about China from CNBC Pro

    The role of law and the court system also have fundamentally different statuses in the U.S. and China. Beijing has been trying to build up its legal system in recent years, but the government is ruled by one party.
    Perkins Coie’s House pointed out that since the U.S. courts are able to rein in what the enforcement part of the government is doing, a Chinese company could make a legal dispute about national security-driven actions — something difficult for a foreign company to do in China.
    He said foreign businesses in China could also consider having more dialogue with their local regulators, so they have a better understanding of what a company is doing and how it’s contributing to the economy.
    China’s Ministry of Commerce on Wednesday met with foreign pharmaceutical companies, and said it would hold regular roundtables with foreign businesses to support their operations. More

  • in

    Stocks making the biggest moves midday: Carvana, Icahn Enterprises, Novavax, Fisker and more

    A Carvana used-car vending machine displays vehicles in Miami, Dec. 9, 2022.
    Joe Raedle | Getty Images

    Check out the companies making headlines in midday trading.
    Carvana — Shares soared 10% in midday trading. The company said on Monday it expected exponential growth within its used electric vehicle segment as consumer demand for EVs skyrocket.

    Lucid — The luxury electric-vehicle company added 3.4%. Lucid has gained more than 15% since January and has added roughly 34% since hitting its 52-week low on June 23.
    Shockwave Medical — Shares of the medical device maker jumped 5.8% following an upgrade to overweight by Morgan Stanley. The Wall Street firm said consensus expectations are misjudging potential catalysts that could improve the sales outlook for its key product.
    DraftKings — The sports betting stock climbed 6.6%. Jefferies included DraftKings on its list of stocks set to benefit as it approaches profitability and highlighted the company’s effort to penetrate “a critical mass of states.”
    Cava — Shares of the Mediterranean restaurant chain rose more than 9% Monday after JPMorgan initiated coverage of Cava with an overweight rating. The investment firm said the newly public Cava has the business model and market opportunity to expand rapidly over the next decade and a half.
    Icahn Enterprises — Shares jumped 17.6% after the company said in a filing it has amended the terms of Carl Icahn’s personal loans to separate them from the trading price of his company’s shares. The issue was highlighted by short seller Hindenburg in a research note, which had triggered a dramatic sell-off in the stock.

    Fisker — Fisker rose 2% after the electric-vehicle maker said it’s issuing a $340 million convertible note offering. Fisker said it plans to use the capital for general corporate purposes, including an additional battery pack line and other products.
    Novavax — The biotech stock gained 25%. On Friday, the company disclosed in a securities filing that it would receive $350 million from Canada for unused Covid-19 vaccines.
    — CNBC’s Jesse Pound, Sarah Min, Yun Li and Samantha Subin contributed reporting. More

  • in

    Bearer of rare ‘One Ring’ card from ‘Lord of the Rings’ lore could fetch $2 million and face hefty tax bill

    An individual in Toronto reportedly found a one-of-a-kind playing card as part of a special “Magic: The Gathering” edition in June.
    Collectors have offered public bids of millions of dollars for the “The One Ring” serialized card.
    If sold, the “ring bearer” would likely pay a top tax rate of 53.53% on half of the profits from the transaction, experts said.
    Based on reported bids, the total tax bill could amount to up to roughly 780,000 Canadian dollars (about $588,000), in one likely scenario.

    Elijah Wood as Frodo in “The Lord of the Rings” film trilogy.
    Courtesy: New Line Cinema

    The One Ring that collectors were coveting this summer wasn’t found in Hobbiton or deep in the tunnels of the Misty Mountains; nor was it discovered in the Elf stronghold of Rivendell, the realm of Gondor or even beyond the Black Gates of Mordor.
    It was found in Toronto last month.

    And the ring bearer — if they choose to sell the “precious” — may owe a hefty tax bill on the profits. Their tax rate could be as high as 53.53%.
    In this case, the One Ring isn’t the physical ring forged by the Dark Lord Sauron in the fires of Mount Doom and coveted by all manner of creatures in Middle Earth, as outlined in the author J.R.R. Tolkien’s “The Lord of the Rings” trilogy.
    Instead, it’s an ultra-rare playing card in “Magic: The Gathering.”

    Seven-figure bids in the quest for ‘The One Ring’

    Wizards of the Coast — the company that created the Magic playing card game in 1993 — issued a “Lord of the Rings”-themed set in June, and featured a “One of One Ring” promotion. One pack contained “The One Ring,” a serialized card of which there’s only one in existence.
    Public bids for the one-of-a-kind card — printed in traditional foil and in the Black Speech of Sauron using Tengwar letterforms, according to Wizards of the Coast — have extended into the millions of dollars.

    Arrows pointing outwards

    The “One Ring” serialized card is a one-of-a-kind Magic: The Gathering card issued in June. Bids for the collectible, which is part of a special “Lord of the Rings” themed Magic edition, have extended into the millions of dollars.
    Wizards of the Coast LLC

    One would-be buyer — Gremio de Dragones, a game store based in Valencia, Spain — offered 2 million euros, about $2.2 million or 2.9 million Canadian dollars. (Its bid also included travel and lodging expenses and a free paella dinner.)
    Another interested party — Dave & Adam’s, a collectibles shop near Buffalo, New York — offered $1 million.
    Wizards of the Coast, which is owned by Hasbro, confirmed the card had been found as of June 30. The finder — who remains anonymous — reportedly lives in Toronto, the biggest city in Canada and the capital of the province of Ontario.
    The odds of finding the card were roughly 1 in 3 million. (By comparison, the odds of winning the Powerball jackpot are about 1 in 292 million.)
    “To me, it’s almost the equivalent of a lottery ticket,” said Scott Plaskett, a Toronto-based certified financial planner and managing partner and CEO at Ironshield Financial Planning.
    More from Personal Finance:How to avoid this tax on high earnersHere’s what a new Supreme Court case could mean for federal wealth tax proposalsThe IRS plans to tax some NFTs as collectibles — and the rich would pay up to 28% on profits

    How Canada taxes capital gains

    However, unlike lottery winnings — which are tax-free in Canada — The One Ring’s finder would generally owe tax on profits incurred from a sale.
    The U.S. also imposes a tax on profits, known as a “capital gains” tax. It applies to stocks, bonds, real estate, collectibles and other assets.
    In both countries, the tax is judged on “cost basis,” a term that refers to the original purchase price. The net profit is the leftover sum after subtracting the cost basis and other potential line items like costs incurred by the seller (like a broker’s fee, for example).
    But the Canadian and U.S. tax systems differ in how they levy a capital gains tax.

    Roger Perzan dressed as Sauron from “The Lord of the Rings” poses for a photo at the Fan Expo in Toronto on Sept. 4, 2015.
    Marta Iwanek | Toronto Star | Getty Images

    The Canadian who acquired The One Ring card would most likely pay tax on half their profits. The rest would be tax-free, experts said.
    This is due to Canada’s use of an “inclusion rate.” Depending on the scenario, only a portion of profits are typically counted (i.e., included) as taxable income.
    The share depends on how the card was acquired, Plaskett said. The inclusion rate is generally 50% — and that would likely apply in this scenario, he said.
    If The One Ring card were sold for 2 million euros — which appears to be the current top bid — then 1 million euros (about CA$1.46 million) would be taxable.
    “We used to do it that way in the U.S. but changed it a number of years ago,” Howard Gleckman, senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, said of omitting a share of profits from tax.  

    Total Canadian tax bill is ‘subjective’

    But what’s Canada’s tax rate on the profits?
    Due to the large sum of money involved, the seller would likely be taxed at Canada’s top income tax rate, experts said.
    In Ontario, the top tax rate is 53.53%. This includes both federal and provincial taxes.
    Because just half of the seller’s profit would be taxed in this example, the individual’s back-of-the-envelope effective tax rate on the transaction would be about 26.8% (or, half of 53.53%). The total tax bill could therefore be up to roughly CA$780,000 in this example (which translates to about $588,000.)
    (In reality, the effective tax rate would be slightly lower since Canada’s income tax system is progressive, as in the U.S., experts said. That means most, but not all, of the profits here would taxed at the top rate.)

    To me, it’s almost the equivalent of a lottery ticket.

    Scott Plaskett
    Toronto-based certified financial planner

    There are alternate taxation scenarios, however, experts said.
    For example, if The One Ring card were accidentally dropped by its owner and then subsequently picked up on the street by someone else, the method of acquisition would change, Plaskett said.
    The inclusion rate would likely jump to 100% in this case — meaning all the profits would be taxed at 53.53%, doubling the total tax bill, he said.
    In some cases, Canadian law also taxes 100% of the profits (instead of 50%) depending on a seller’s intent, said John Oakey, vice president of taxation at Chartered Professional Accountants Canada.
    For example, if the person who found The One Ring card were the owner of a collectible store — and buying and selling cards was their business — a sale may be intended as a business transaction, in which case all the profits would be taxed.

    There’s some ambiguity here, though, Oakey said. For example, what if the card’s owner — even if it was a hobbyist collector — put considerable effort into maximizing their profit by, among other things, proactively soliciting bids from numerous potential buyers?
    The Canada Revenue Agency (Canada’s equivalent to the IRS) might also treat the sale as a business transaction in this case — in which case the full CA$2.9 million would be taxed at 53.53%.
    “It’s a subjective area,” Oakey said. “It’s not black and white.”

    How the U.S. taxes capital gains

    In some ways, the U.S. system is more concrete, he said.
    That’s because preferential capital gains tax treatment in the U.S. is based on duration.
    If an asset like a stock is bought and held for a year or less, profits don’t get preferential treatment. They’re treated as a “short term” capital gain, taxed at ordinary income tax rates, which are as high as 37% at the federal level.
    A “long term” capital gain applies to assets held for more than a year. They get preferential treatment.

    Sir Ian McKellen as Gandalf and Elijah Wood as Frodo in “The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring.”
    New Line | WireImage | Getty Images

    Here, there’s a distinction between collectibles and assets like stocks, however. Stocks are taxed at a top long-term federal capital gains tax rate of 20%; but collectibles have a top rate of 28%. (In both cases, there’s also a 3.8% net investment income tax for high earners, in addition to any state and local taxes on capital gains.)
    The One Ring card would “almost definitely be deemed a collectible,” said Joe Hughes, federal policy analyst at the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.
    For example, a seller in Michigan would pay a top long-term capital gains rate of about 36% on a collectible item, Hughes said. The rough total tax bill on the $2.2 million top bid would be about $792,000 in this example.
    In a state like Tennessee, which doesn’t levy a state income tax, the top long-term capital gains rate would be 31.8%.
    In other words: The ring bearer would appear to fare better in Canada over the U.S. — from the perspective of tax rates, anyway.
    Of course, whether Ringwraiths descend upon the ring bearer from the lair of Minas Morgul, or whether men ensnared by the evil, corrupting grip of the ring try to snatch it from the ring bearer’s grasp, this publication cannot say. More

  • in

    Trying to choose Pretax vs. Roth 401(k)? Why it’s trickier than you think, experts say

    Life Changes

    Choosing between pretax versus Roth 401(k) plan contributions can be more complicated than you expect, experts say.
    Pretax 401(k) deposits provide an upfront tax break, but you’ll owe levies when you withdraw the funds.
    By comparison, Roth 401(k) contributions happen after taxes, but your money can grow tax-free.
    However, the best choice depends on more than just your current and future tax brackets.

    Prostock-Studio | Istock | Getty Images

    If you have a 401(k), one of the big questions is whether to make pretax or Roth contributions — and the answer may be complicated, experts say.
    While pretax 401(k) contributions reduce your adjusted gross income, you’ll owe levies on growth upon withdrawal. By comparison, Roth 401(k) deposits won’t provide an upfront tax break, but the money can grow tax-free.

    Some 80% of employer retirement plans offered Roth contributions in 2022, compared with 71% in 2018, according to a recent Vanguard report based on roughly 1,700 retirement plans.  

    More from Life Changes:

    Here’s a look at other stories offering a financial angle on important lifetime milestones.

    While your current and future tax brackets are part of the puzzle, experts say there are other factors to consider.
    “It’s hard speaking in broad terms, because there are so many things that go into making that decision,” said certified financial planner Ashton Lawrence at Mariner Wealth Advisors in Greenville, South Carolina.
    Here’s how to decide what’s right for your 401(k) plan.

    Current vs. future tax brackets

    One of the big questions to consider is whether you expect to be in a higher or lower tax bracket in retirement, experts say.

    Generally speaking, pretax contributions are better for higher earners because of the upfront tax break, Lawrence said. But if your tax bracket is lower, paying levies now with Roth deposits may make sense.

    If you’re in the 22% or 24% bracket or lower, I think the Roth contribution makes sense, assuming you’ll be in a higher bracket upon retirement.

    Lawrence Pon
    CPA at Pon & Associates

    Roth 401(k) contributions are typically good for younger workers who expect to earn more later in their careers, explained Lawrence Pon, a CFP and certified public accountant at Pon & Associates in Redwood City, California.
    “If you’re in the 22% or 24% bracket or lower, I think the Roth contribution makes sense, assuming you’ll be in a higher bracket upon retirement,” he said. 

    There’s a ‘low-tax sweet spot’ through 2025

    Although it’s unclear how Congress may change tax policy, several provisions from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 are scheduled to sunset in 2026, including lower tax brackets and a higher standard deduction.
    Experts say these expected changes may also factor into the pretax versus Roth contributions analysis.
    “We’re in this low-tax sweet spot,” said Catherine Valega, a CFP and founder of Green Bee Advisory in Boston, referring to the period before tax brackets may get higher. “I say taxes are on sale.” 

    We’re in this low-tax sweet spot.

    Catherine Valega
    Founder of Green Bee Advisory

    While Roth contributions are a “no-brainer” for young, lower earners, she said the current tax environment has made these deposits more attractive for higher-income clients, as well. 
    “I have clients who can get in $22,500 for three years,” Valega said. “That’s a pretty nice chunk of change that will grow tax-free.”
    Plus, recent changes from Secure 2.0 have made Roth 401(k) contributions more appealing for some investors, she said. Plans may now offer Roth employer matches and Roth 401(k)s no longer have required minimum distributions. Of course, plans may vary based on which features employers choose to adopt.

    Consider your ‘legacy goals’

    “Legacy goals” are also a factor when deciding between pretax and Roth contributions, said Lawrence from Mariner Wealth Advisors.
    “Estate planning is becoming a larger piece of what people are actually thinking about,” he said.
    Since the Secure Act of 2019, tax planning has become trickier for inherited individual retirement accounts. Previously, nonspouse beneficiaries could “stretch” withdrawals across their lifetime. But now, they must deplete inherited IRAs within 10 years, known as the “10-year rule.”

    The withdrawal timeline is now “much more compact, which can impact the beneficiary, especially if they’re in their peak earning years,” Lawrence said.
    However, Roth IRAs can be a “better estate planning tool” than traditional pretax accounts because nonspouse beneficiaries won’t owe taxes on withdrawals, he said.
    “Everyone has their own preferences,” Lawrence added. “We just try to provide the best options for what they’re trying to achieve.”  More