Finance

With less than a week left before America’s presidential and congressional elections, market participants are abuzz with discussion of what the various results might mean for everything from trade and defence to tax and regulation. But the Treasury market, which ultimately underpins much of global finance, is of particular interest. More

At the 39th ASEAN Roundtable, hosted by a research institute in Singapore on October 28th, the room was split. With Asia riven by an assertive China and a protectionist America, some attendees called for hard-headed thinking about trade-offs. Choices will have to be made; allegiances declared, they warned. A Donald Trump victory might, after all, bring brutal tariffs. More

Finance Minister Rachel Reeves on Wednesday hiked capital gains tax (CGT) and increased the rate of tax applied to an entrepreneurs’ relief scheme as part of her far-reaching budget announcement.
Reeves’ plans had caused angst among tech founders in the country, with British tech lobby group Startup Coalition previously warning the government’s tax plans could result in a tech “brain drain.”
One tech founder who last week threatened to move to the U.S. over the anticipated tax changes, told CNBC that Wednesday’s announcement was “better than I thought it would be.”

On Monday, British tech lobby group Startup Coalition warned in a blog post that there was a risk Reeves’ tax plans could result in a tech “brain drain.”. (Photo by Oli Scarff/Getty Images)
Oli Scarff | Getty Images

LONDON — Britain’s Labour government on Wednesday announced plans to raise the rate of capital gains tax on share sales, news that offered some relief for technology entrepreneurs who feared a more intense tax raid on the wealthy.
Finance Minister Rachel Reeves on Wednesday hiked capital gains tax (CGT) — a levy on the profit investors make from the sale of an investment — as part of her far-reaching budget announcement. The lower capital gains tax rate will be increased to 18% from 10%, while the higher rate will climb to 24% from 20%, Reeves said. The tax hikes are expected to bring in £2.5 billion.

“We need to drive growth, promote entrepreneurship and support wealth creation, while raising the revenue required to fund our public services and restore our public finances,” Reeves said, adding that, even with the higher rate, the U.K. would “still have the lowest capital-gains tax rate of any European G7 economy.”
Reeves maintained the £1 million lifetime limit on capital gains from the sale of all or part of a company under business asset disposal relief (BADR), quashing fears from entrepreneurs that the tax relief scheme for entrepreneurs would be scrapped.
However, she added that the rate of CGT applied to entrepreneurs selling all or part of their business under BADR will be increased to 14% in 2025 and 18% a year later. She stressed that this still represented a “significant gap compared to the higher rate of capital gains tax.”
In a less welcome move for businesses, Reeves also announced plans to increase the rate of National Insurance (NI) — a tax on earnings — for employers. The current rate is 13.8% on a worker’s earnings above £9,100 per year. This is set to rise to 15% on salaries above £5,000 a year.
The changes form only a small part of sweeping fiscal changes the recently-elected Labour government laid out in its debut budget Wednesday in an attempt to close a multibillion-pound funding gap in public finances.

‘Brain drain’ feared

Reeves’ announcement comes after speculation over capital gains tax changes caused a backlash from tech founders and investors. Even prior to Reeves’ announcement, the anticipation that CGT would increase had caused angst for tech founders across the country.
On Monday, British tech lobby group Startup Coalition warned in a blog post that there was a risk Reeves’ tax plans could result in a tech “brain drain.”
A survey of 713 founders and investors conducted by Startup Coalition with private company database Beauhurst, showed that 89% of those polled would consider moving themselves or their business abroad, with 72% having already explored this possibility.
The survey data also showed that 94% of founders would consider starting a future company outside of the U.K. if the government were to raise the CGT rate.
Dom Hallas, executive director of Startup Coalition, said that while the survey findings were grim, he doesn’t expect founders will “flee if things get hard” as they “aren’t naive about the role of taxes in society.”
Following Reeves’ budget speech, Hallas told CNBC via text message that, “Any budget with increases to CGT and NI, gradual increases to BADR and taxes on investors going up, is never easy and today will be hard for founders seeing taxes on their businesses rise.”
However, he added: “We appreciate that the Government has listened to ensure that entrepreneurs’ biggest fears have not materialised and some balance has been struck including maintaining all important R&D [research and development] investment.”

Barney Hussey-Yeo, CEO and co-founder of financial technology app Cleo, told CNBC last week he was considering a move to the U.S. as a result of Labour’s tax plans.
“There’s so many founders already leaving, or already considering leaving — and they’re excited to go to Silicon Valley,” Hussey-Yeo told CNBC on the sidelines of venture capital firm Accel’s EMEA Fintech Summit in London last week.
Hussey-Yeo didn’t respond to a request for comment Wednesday on whether he still plans to move abroad. However, he told CNBC that the budget announcement was “better than I thought it would be,” adding it “seems like they listened” to entrepreneurs.
Paul Taylor, CEO of London-headquartered fintech firm Thought Machine, said that though it was reassuring to see the government listening to founder concerns, increases to NI contributions would prove costly. Thought Machine’s U.K. payroll spend is expected to spike by £800,000 as a result.
“This is a significant amount for companies like us, which rely on investor capital and already face cost pressures and targets,” Taylor told CNBC Wednesday. “Nearly all emerging tech businesses run on investor capital, and this increase sets them back on their path to profitability.”

Focus on growth-oriented policy

Tech entrepreneurs and investors are urging the government to return to its focus on fostering growth and innovation in the U.K., messages which were key to Labour’s election manifesto prior to the landslide win that saw Keir Starmer become prime minister.
“We’re already seeing early-stage firms in the UK struggle securing pre-seed and seed funding, with VCs here having a lower risk appetite. A higher CGT will act as a further deterrent,” Phil Kwok, co-founder of EasyA, an e-learning startup, told CNBC via email.
“With all the factors at play, we could see investors and the next generation of founders looking to another markets like the U.S.,” he added.
Hannah Seal, a partner at Index Ventures, told CNBC that the government should “pursue reforms that make it easier for startups to attract talent through employee ownership and ensure all regulators prioritise innovation and growth.”
“Startup-friendly policies like these will be essential to signal the U.K.’s commitment to remaining a globally competitive hub for innovation, especially in light of today’s announcements,” she added.
Edgar Randall, managing director of U.K. and Ireland at data and analytics firm Dun & Bradstreet, told CNBC that in order to remain competitive, the government should “weigh the cumulative effect of policies impacting growth.”
These include policies impacting energy costs, employer National Insurance contributions, and tax structures on capital gains and dividends.
Ultimately, “business decisions are influenced on more than just fiscal policy,” Randall said, adding that. ‘entrepreneurs look at the ecosystems [as] a whole.” More

China’s Xiaomi said Tuesday that it had delivered more than 20,000 SU7 EVs in October as it ramps up production for its electric car venture in a fiercely competitive market.
Xiaomi on Tuesday also announced it was taking preorders for the high-end sports version, SU7 Ultra, starting at 814,900 yuan ($114,304), ahead of the product release in March 2025.
Citi analysts raised their forecast for Xiaomi car deliveries to 250,000 vehicles next year, up from 238,000 previously expected.

Chinese smartphone company Xiaomi on Tuesday announced a sports car version of its SU7 electric sedan would begin preorders for the equivalent of more than $110,000.
Luna Lin | Afp | Getty Images

BEIJING — China’s Xiaomi said Tuesday that it had delivered more than 20,000 SU7 EVs in October as it ramps up production for its electric car venture in a fiercely competitive market.
The Chinese company, which is largely known for its smartphones and home appliances, reiterated plans to deliver 100,000 SU7 vehicles by the end of November. Xiaomi first revealed plans to make cars in 2021 and began building a dedicated manufacturing plant the same year.

The company released the basic version of the SU7, its first car, in late March for about $4,000 less than Tesla’s cheapest car — Model 3 — in China at the time. Tesla subsequently cut the car’s price by about $2,000. Xiaomi has delivered more than 75,000 SU7 cars to date, including October’s figures.
Chinese rivals Xpeng and Nio took about six years to produce 100,000 electric cars, while it took Tesla 12 years.
While Xpeng delivered a monthly record of more than 20,000 cars in September, with about half owed to its newly launched, lower-cost brand Mona, Nio has struggled to keep monthly deliveries above 20,000 cars.
Zeekr, an electric car brand founded by automaker Geely, has claimed it produced more than 100,000 vehicles in 1.5 years. It delivered a record 21,333 cars in September.
Data on other Chinese electric car companies’ deliveries for October is expected Friday.

“News of 20k deliveries in October confirms that [Xiaomi] is going to be a force to reckon with in the world’s largest EV market,” said Brian Tycangco, an analyst at Stansberry Research.
He said Xiaomi’s electric car gross profit margins in August were similar to Xpeng’s that month, and have likely improved since, given ramped up production.
Xiaomi on Tuesday also announced it was taking preorders for the high-end sports version, SU7 Ultra, starting at 814,900 yuan ($114,304), ahead of a product release in March 2025. The company claimed that within 10 minutes, it received more than 3,600 preorders, each requiring a 10,000 yuan deposit.
The new model and its touted achievements on the Nurburgring race track in Germany will likely help Xiaomi sell more of its premium SU7 Max car, which costs just 299,900 yuan, Citi analysts said in a report. They now expect Xiaomi to deliver 250,000 cars next year, up from 238,000 previously forecast.
Xiaomi claimed a prototype of the SU7 Ultra this week became the fastest four-door sedan to complete the German race track.
Citi analysts increased their price target on Xiaomi to 30.60 Hong Kong dollars ($3.94), up from 22.70 HK dollars. They also raised forecasts for the company’s smartphone shipments, following the launch of Xiaomi’s flagship Mi 15 device Tuesday — the first phone to use Qualcomm’s newest chipset.

Stock chart icon

Tesla’s Model Y was the best-selling battery-powered electric car in China in September with 48,202 vehicles sold, according to data from Chinese car industry site Autohome. The Model 3 ranked 8th with nearly 24,000 cars sold.
BYD’s lower-priced models accounted for most of the other top 10 bestsellers in the battery-only category. Xiaomi’s SU7 ranked 17th last month with 13,559 cars sold, the data showed.
Xiaomi currently only sells its cars in China. The company told CNBC earlier this year it would take at least two to three years for any overseas launch.
— CNBC’s Sonia Heng contributed to this report. More

“Chinese companies are becoming increasingly interested in getting listed in Hong Kong or New York, due to difficulty in getting listed in Mainland China and pressure from shareholders to quickly achieve an exit,” said Marcia Ellis, Hong Kong-based global co-chair of private equity practice, Morrison Foerster.
Few large China-based companies have listed in New York since the Didi IPO in the summer of 2021 increased scrutiny by U.S. and Chinese regulators on such listings.
Many Chinese companies that list in Hong Kong see it as a way to test investors’ appetite for an IPO in another country, said Reuben Lai, vice president, private capital, Greater China at Preqin.

Chinese autonomous driving company WeRide listed on the Nasdaq on Friday, Oct. 25, 2024.
China News Service | China News Service | Getty Images

BEIJING — Chinese IPOs in the U.S. and Hong Kong are set to increase next year, analysts said, as some high-profile listings outside the mainland this year raise investor optimism over profitable exits.
Chinese autonomous driving company WeRide listed on the Nasdaq Friday with shares rising nearly 6.8%. Earlier this month, Chinese robotaxi operator Pony.ai also filed paperwork to list on the Nasdaq. Both companies have long aimed to go public.

Few large China-based companies have listed in New York since the Didi IPO in the summer of 2021 increased scrutiny by U.S. and Chinese regulators on such listings. The Chinese ride-hailing company was forced to temporarily suspend new user registrations, and got delisted in less than a year.
U.S. and Chinese authorities have since clarified the process for a China-based company to go public in New York. But geopolitics and market changes have substantially reduced U.S. IPOs of Chinese businesses.
“After a couple of slow years, we generally expect the IPO market to revive in 2025, bolstered by interest rate decreases and (to some extent) the conclusion of the U.S. presidential election,” Marcia Ellis, Hong Kong-based global co-chair of private equity practice, Morrison Foerster, said in an email.

“While there is a market perception of regulatory issues between the U.S. and China as being problematic, many of the issues driving this perception have been solved,” she said.
“Chinese companies are becoming increasingly interested in getting listed in Hong Kong or New York, due to difficulty in getting listed in Mainland China and pressure from shareholders to quickly achieve an exit.” 

This year, as many as 42 companies have gone public on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, and there were 96 IPO applications pending listing or under processing as of Sept. 30, according to the exchange’s website.
Last week, Horizon Robotics — a Chinese artificial intelligence and auto chip developer — and state-owned bottled water company CR Beverage went public in Hong Kong.
The two were the exchange’s largest IPOs of the year, excluding listings of companies that also trade in the mainland, according to Renaissance Capital, which tracks global IPOs. The firm noted that Chinese delivery giant SF Express is planning for a Hong Kong IPO next month, while Chinese automaker Chery aims for one next year.
Still, the overall pace of Hong Kong IPOs this year is slightly slower than expected, George Chan, global IPO leader at EY, told CNBC in an interview earlier this month.
He said the fourth quarter is generally not a good period for listings and expects most companies to wait until at least February. In his conversations with early stage investors, “they are very optimistic about next year” and are preparing companies for IPOs, Chan said.
The planned listings are generally life sciences, tech or consumer companies, he said.

Hong Kong, then New York

Investor sentiment on Chinese stocks has improved over the last few weeks thanks to high-level stimulus announcements. Lower interest rates also make stocks more attractive than bonds. The Hang Seng Index has surged over 20% so far this year after four straight years of declines.
Many Chinese companies that list in Hong Kong also see it as a way to test investors’ appetite for an IPO in another country, said Reuben Lai, vice president, private capital, Greater China at Preqin.
“Geopolitical tensions make Hong Kong a preferred market,” Ellis said, “but the depth and breadth of US capital markets still make many companies seriously consider New York, especially for those that focus on advanced technology and are not yet profitable, who sometimes believe that their equity stories will be better received by U.S. investors.”  
Just over half of IPOs on U.S. exchanges since 2023 have come from foreign-based companies, a 20-year high, according to EY.
Geely-backed Chinese electric car company Zeekr and Chinese-owned Amer Sports both listed in the U.S. earlier this year, according to EY’s list of major cross-border IPOs.
Chinese electric truck manufacturer Windrose said it intends to list in the U.S. in the first half of 2025, with a dual listing in Europe later that year. The company, which aims to deliver 10,000 trucks by 2027, on Sunday announced it moved its global headquarters to Belgium.
A recovery in Chinese IPOs in the U.S. and Hong Kong can help funds cash out on their early stage investments in startups. The lack of IPOs had reduced the incentive for funds to back startups.
Now, investors are looking at China again, after recently deploying capital to India and the Middle East, Preqin’s Lai said. “I’m definitely seeing a greater potential from now in China whether it’s money coming back, valuation of the companies, exit environment [or] performance of the funds.”
While the pickup in investor activity is far from levels seen in the last two years, the nascent recovery includes some investments in consumer products such as milk tea and supermarkets, Lai said. More

JPMorgan Chase has begun suing customers who allegedly stole thousands of dollars from ATMs by taking advantage of a technical glitch that allowed them to withdraw funds before a check bounced.
The bank on Monday filed lawsuits in at least three federal courts, taking aim at some of the people who drew down the highest amounts in the so-called infinite money glitch that went viral on TikTok.
A Houston case involves a man who owes JPMorgan $290,939.47 after an unidentified accomplice deposited a counterfeit $335,000 check at an ATM, according to the bank.

JPMorgan Chase has begun suing customers who allegedly stole thousands of dollars from ATMs by taking advantage of a technical glitch that allowed them to withdraw funds before a check bounced.
The bank on Monday filed lawsuits in at least three federal courts, taking aim at some of the people who withdrew the highest amounts in the so-called infinite money glitch that went viral on TikTok and other social media platforms in late August.

A Houston case involves a man who owes JPMorgan $290,939.47 after an unidentified accomplice deposited a counterfeit $335,000 check at an ATM, according to the bank.
“On August 29, 2024, a masked man deposited a check in Defendant’s Chase bank account in the amount of $335,000,” the bank said in the Texas filing. “After the check was deposited, Defendant began withdrawing the vast majority of the ill-gotten funds.”
JPMorgan, the biggest U.S. bank by assets, is investigating thousands of possible cases related to the “infinite money glitch,” though it hasn’t disclosed the scope of associated losses. Despite the waning use of paper checks as digital forms of payment gain popularity, they’re still a major avenue for fraud, resulting in $26.6 billion in losses globally last year, according to Nasdaq’s Global Financial Crime Report.
The infinite money glitch episode highlights the risk that social media can amplify vulnerabilities discovered at a financial institution. Videos began circulating in late August showing people celebrating the withdrawal of wads of cash from Chase ATMs shortly after bad checks were deposited.
Normally, banks only make available a fraction of the value of a check until it clears, which takes several days. JPMorgan says it closed the loophole a few days after it was discovered.

Miami and California

The other lawsuits filed Monday are in courts including Miami and the Central District of California, and involve cases where JPMorgan says customers owe the bank sums ranging from about $80,000 to $141,000.
Most cases being examined by the bank are for far smaller amounts, according to people with knowledge of the situation who declined to be identified speaking about the internal investigation.
In each case, JPMorgan says its security team reached out to the alleged fraudster, but it hasn’t been repaid for the phony checks, in violation of the deposit agreement that customers sign when creating an account with the bank.
JPMorgan is seeking the return of the stolen funds with interest and overdraft fees, as well as lawyers’ fees and, in some cases, punitive damages, according to the complaints.

Criminal cases?

The lawsuits are likely to be just the start of a wave of litigation meant to force customers to repay their debts and signal broadly that the bank won’t tolerate fraud, according to the people familiar. JPMorgan prioritized cases with large dollar amounts and indications of possible ties to criminal groups, they said.
The civil cases are separate from potential criminal investigations; JPMorgan says it has also referred cases to law enforcement officials across the country.
“Fraud is a crime that impacts everyone and undermines trust in the banking system,” JPMorgan spokesman Drew Pusateri said in a statement to CNBC. “We’re pursuing these cases and actively cooperating with law enforcement to make sure if someone is committing fraud against Chase and its customers, they’re held accountable.”

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

AI Age
AI Insights

Sierra, the startup founded by ex-Salesforce co-CEO Bret Taylor and former Google executive Clay Bavor, has raised a funding round that values the company at $4.5 billion. 
The $175 million round was led by Greenoaks Capital, with participation from ICONIQ and Josh Kushner’s Thrive Capital. 
One in every three venture dollars this year has gone to an artificial intelligence startup, according to CB Insights.

Artificial intelligence startup Sierra, co-founded by ex-Salesforce co-CEO Bret Taylor, is more than quadrupling its valuation to $4.5 billion in a fresh funding round.
The San Francisco-based company, which was valued at $1 billion in January, raised $175 million in a funding round led by Greenoaks Capital. The Information reported earlier this month that Sierra was in the midst of raising capital.

Taylor is chairman of OpenAI’s board and previously ran Salesforce, alongside Marc Benioff. He was also chairman of Twitter when Elon Musk was negotiating to buy the social media company. Taylor is a longtime entrepreneur, widely credited with helping to create Google Maps. At Google, he met his Sierra co-founder Clay Bavor, who spent nearly two decades at the tech giant, leading virtual reality efforts and Google Labs.
Sierra is focused on helping enterprises like home security company ADT, Sonos, Weight Watchers and Casper personalize and implement AI agents for customer service. Taylor and Bavor unveiled the startup earlier this year.
“We think every company in the world, whether it’s a technology company or a 150-year-old company like ADT, can benefit from AI, and the technology is ready right now,” Taylor told CNBC in an interview. “We want to enable Sierra to address that market, and that means expanding internationally and to other industries.” 
ICONIQ and Josh Kushner’s Thrive Capital contributed to the new funding round.
Taylor describes Sierra as “conversational AI,” and bristles at the word “chatbot,” even banning the phrase in the company’s downtown San Francisco office. Sierra is looking to create a more conversational style of interaction, Taylor said. He pointed to the ease of OpenAI’s ChatGPT and compared it with the frustrating experience of talking on the phone with an airline bot.

“When you think of chatbots, you think of those annoying, robotic things — you can feel the difference,” Taylor said, adding that Sierra is making its agents more “empathetic and conversational.”

Bret Taylor, co-CEO of Salesforce, speaks at the Viva Technology Conference in Paris on June 15, 2022.
Nathan Laine | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Sierra’s team lets each client customize the agent’s personality to its corporate brand. Clothing company Chubbies, for example, took a more sarcastic route with a younger sounding agent named Duncan Smothers. Taylor said some luxury brands are opting for a British accent with a more serious tone. 
“We really think that your conversational AI agent should be not only transactional, but a brand ambassador,” Taylor said. “It’s actually something that is a statement of your values. So do you want to be sarcastic? Do you want to use emoji? Do you want it to sound like text messaging, or do you want it to sound like a lawyer?”
Sierra uses what Bavor and Taylor describe as a “constellation” of models, with a “supervisor.” The technology uses one model to do the heavy lifting, with the expectation that it won’t be 100% reliable, but use a second model as a backup, to “check” the others and help with accuracy. The company currently relies on large language models from OpenAI, Anthropic and Meta, among others. 
There’s competition in the space. Taylor’s former company, Salesforce, as well as Microsoft, in partnership with OpenAI, are exploring the AI agent space. Taylor compared Sierra with the companies that built cloud software on top of Amazon Web Services and other cloud infrastructure.
“In the cloud era, you had Shopify, Salesforce, ServiceNow and Adobe — I think the same thing will play out in AI with Sierra,” Taylor said. “We’re helping their branded customer facing agent.”
He mentioned startups like Cursor, which makes coding agents, and Harvey, which makes legal agents.
Sierra’s funding follows a flurry of major AI announcements in Silicon Valley. OpenAI raised billions of dollars at a $157 billion valuation. Perplexity is in the midst of raising a round that values the company at $9 billion, a source confirmed to CNBC. One in three venture dollars this year has gone to an AI startup, according to CB Insights. 
“When a technology wave like this happens, I think a lot of people are trying to place their bets,” Taylor said. “I don’t know which company will win, but it’s a smart investment, categorically. Clearly customer experience and customer service is a huge opportunity, and I think we are the leader in this space, and seeing a lot of demands because of that.” 

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

Kristo Käärmann, who co-founded Wise in 2011, was on Monday ordered by the Financial Conduct Authority to pay a £350,000 fine.
The FCA said that Käärmann failed to notify the regulator about him not paying a capital gains tax liability when he cashed in on shares worth £10 million in 2017.
The watchdog found him in breach of its Senior Management Conduct Rule 4, which states: “You must disclose appropriately any information of which the FCA would reasonably expect notice.”

Kristo Kaarmann, CEO and co-founder of Wise.
Eoin Noonan | Sportsfile | Getty Images

LONDON — Kristo Käärmann, the billionaire CEO of money transfer firm Wise, was slapped with a £350,000 ($454 million) fine by financial regulators in the U.K for failing to report an issue with his tax filings.
Käärmann, who co-founded Wise in 2011 with fellow entrepreneur Taavet Hinrikus, was on Monday ordered by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to pay the sizable penalty due to a breach of the watchdog’s senior manager conduct rule.

The FCA said that Käärmann failed to notify the regulator about him not paying a capital gains tax liability when he cashed in on shares worth £10 million in 2017.
The watchdog found him in breach of its Senior Management Conduct Rule 4, which states: “You must disclose appropriately any information of which the FCA would reasonably expect notice.”
It comes after the Wise boss was hit with a separate £365,651 fine by U.K. tax collection agency Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) in 2021 for being late to submitting his tax returns during the 2017/18 tax year.
Käärmann’s name was added to HMRC’s public tax defaulters list. His tax liability for that year was £720,495, according to HMRC. He has a net worth of $1.8 billion, according to Forbes.

‘High standards’ expected

The FCA said Monday that, between February 2021 and September 2021, the tax issues were relevant to its assessment of Käärmann’s fitness and propriety as a senior director of a financial services firm.

Käärmann failed to consider the significance of the issues and notify the FCA despite being aware of them for over seven months, the regulator added.
“We, and the public, expect high standards from leaders of financial firms, including being frank and open,” Therese Chambers, joint executive director of enforcement and oversight, said in a statement Monday.

“It should have been obvious to Mr Käärmann that he needed to tell us about these issues which were highly relevant to our assessment of his fitness and propriety.” 
Käärmann said in a statement Monday that he remains “focused on delivering the mission for Wise and achieving our long-term vision.” “After several years and full cooperation with the FCA, we have brought this process to a close,” he said.
“We continue to build a product and a company that will serve our customers and owners for the decades to come,” Käärmann added.
The chair of Wise, David Wells, said that the company’s board of directors “continues to take Wise’s regulatory obligations very seriously.”
Wise’s board found that Käärmann was “fit and proper” to continue in his role at the firm after an internal investigation in 2021.
As a result of that review, Käärmann was required by the board to take “remedial actions” to ensure his personal tax affairs were appropriately managed.

Less severe than feared

The value of the FCA’s fine is substantially lower than the potential maximum fine he could have faced.
Käärmann could have been fined as much as £500,000 for his tax failings, but qualified for a 30% discount because he agreed to resolve the issues.

News of the fine comes after Wise earlier this month reported a 17% increase in “underlying income,” which consists of cross-border revenue, card and other revenue, and interest income.
Wise reiterated its target of achieving an underlying profit before tax margin of 13% to 16% over the medium term thanks to investments in pricing, and added that meant it wouldn’t have to make “further material investments in reduced pricing” in the second half of the year.
In a note Monday, analysts at British investment bank Peel Hunt boosted their expectations for Wise’s full-year profit before tax by 15%. They have a £1,000 price target and a “buy” rating on the stock.
“While Wise made no changes to the guidance set in June 2024, we expect a significant near-term beat,” Peel Hunt analysts Gautam Pillai and Barun Singh wrote in the note. 
Käärmann and Hinrikus, both Estonian tech entrepreneurs who immigrated to the U.K., took Wise from a scrappy startup to a payments disruptor now worth £7.4 billion.
They created Wise to offer a low-cost alternative to banks charging hidden fees for moving money across borders. More