Finance

Here’s what the company reported: Earnings of $2.60 a share vs. $2.20 a share LSEG estimate
Revenue: $17.74 billion vs. expected $16.58 billion

People walk out of the Morgan Stanley global headquarters in Manhattan on March 20, 2025 in New York City. 
Spencer Platt | Getty Images

Morgan Stanley on Friday reported first-quarter results that topped estimates as stock trading revenue surged 45% amid rising global volatility.
Here’s what the company reported:

Earnings: $2.60 a share vs. $2.20 a share LSEG estimate
Revenue: $17.74 billion vs. expected $16.58 billion

The company said earnings rose 26% to $4.32 billion, or $2.60 per share, while revenue rose 17% to a record $17.74 billion.
Equity trading was the standout this quarter, as revenues jumped 45% to $4.13 billion, about $840 million more than the StreetAccount estimate.
Morgan Stanley said that its equity results were strong across its franchise, but particularly in Asia and in operations catering to hedge funds “driven by strong client activity amid a more volatile trading environment.”
Elsewhere, the company mostly met expectations.
Fixed income trading rose 5% to $2.6 billion, essentially matching the StreetAccount estimate. Investment banking rose 8% to $1.56 billion, just under the $1.61 billion estimate.

Wealth management revenue rose 6% to $7.33 billion, matching the estimate.
Shares of Morgan Stanley, like those of its peers, have whipsawed in recent days as President Donald Trump’s trade policies have increased concern that the U.S. was headed for a recession.
The bank’s massive wealth management business was be helped by high stock market values in the first quarter, which inflates the management fees it collects.
Analysts will want to ask about the outlook for mergers and IPO listings, which may be curtailed amid the tensions.
This story is developing. Please check back for updates. More

A global trade slowdown tied to U.S. tariffs will likely create a more challenging environment for bond fund managers, according to financial futurist Dave Nadig.
“All of these capital holding requirements that led to buying U.S. Treasurys are kind of unwinding at the same time,” the former ETF.com CEO told CNBC’s “ETF Edge” on Wednesday. “So, the traditional math of things are bad for stocks, [and] everybody is going to buy bond just isn’t working out this time because the kind of shock we’re seeing is one we’ve never seen before.”  

The benchmark 10-year Treasury Note yield increased to 4.4% on Thursday. The yield is up more than 10 percent just this week. Last Friday, it touched 3.86%.
Nadig thinks slowing trade will continue to impact market activity.
“When you have less trade, you need to finance less trade,” he said. “Historically, people have needed to finance dollars. That’s why every country in the world buys U.S. Treasurys. It helps them manage their international trade with the United States. So, if we’re slowing down the amount of international trade, we should expect in aggregate the holdings of bonds to probably come down.”

Disclaimer More

China’s exporters are trying to mitigate the impact of triple-digit U.S. tariffs by raising prices for Americans while accelerating plans to diversify operations.
U.S. consumers could even lose access to certain products in June since some American companies have halted their plans to import textiles from China, said Ryan Zhao, director at Jiangsu Green Willow Textile.
With new tariffs of about 145%, China’s shipments to the U.S. will likely plunge by 80% over the next two years, Julian Evans-Pritchard, head of China economics at Capital Economics, predicted late Thursday.

Machinery and vehicles ready for shipment at the dock of the Oriental Port Branch of Lianyungang Port in China, on Sept. 27, 2024.
Costfoto | Nurphoto | Getty Images

BEIJING — U.S. has raised tariffs on Chinese imports to triple digits. For China’s exporters, it means raising prices for Americans while accelerating plans to diversify operations — and, in some cases, stopping shipments entirely.
U.S. consumers could lose access to certain products in June since some American companies have halted their plans to import textiles from China, said Ryan Zhao, director at Jiangsu Green Willow Textile.

For products that continue to be shipped from China, “it’s impossible to predict” by how much their prices will rise for U.S. consumers, he said Thursday in Chinese, translated by CNBC. “It takes two to four months for products to be shipped from China’s ports and arrive on U.S. supermarket shelves. In the last two months tariffs have climbed from 10% to 125% today.”
The White House has confirmed the U.S. tariff rate on Chinese goods was effectively at 145%. Triple-digit tariffs essentially cut off most trade, a Tax Foundation economist told CNBC’s “The Exchange.”
But U.S.-China trade relationship won’t change overnight, even as American companies that source from China are looking for alternatives.

Tony Post, CEO of U.S.-based running shoe company Topo Athletic, said he is planning to work more with suppliers based in Vietnam in addition to his existing China suppliers.
When the initial two rounds of 10% U.S. tariffs were imposed this year, he said his four China suppliers offered to split the cost with Topo. But now “more than the cost of the product itself has been added in import duties just in the last few months,” he said.

“I’m going to eventually have to raise prices and I don’t know for sure what impact that is going to have on our business,” Post said. Before Trump started with tariffs, Post predicted nearly $100 million in revenue this year — primarily from the U.S.

Economic fallout

Hopes for a U.S.-China deal to resolve trade tensions have faded fast as Beijing has hit back in the last week with tit-for-tat duties on American goods and wide-ranging restrictions on U.S. businesses.
With steep tariffs, China’s shipments to the U.S. will likely plunge by 80% over the next two years, Julian Evans-Pritchard, head of China economics at Capital Economics, said late Thursday.
Goldman Sachs on Thursday cut its China GDP forecast to 4% given the drag from U.S. trade tensions and slower global growth.
While Chinese exports to the U.S. only account for about 3 percentage points of China’s total GDP, there’s still a significant impact on employment, Goldman Sachs analysts said. They estimate around 10 million to 20 million workers in China are involved with U.S.-bound export businesses.
As Beijing tries to address already slowing growth, one of its strategies is to help Chinese exporters sell more at home. China’s Ministry of Commerce said Thursday it recently gathered major business associations to discuss measures to boost sales domestically instead of overseas.
But Chinese consumers have been reluctant to spend, a trend reinforced by yet another drop in consumer price inflation, data released Thursday showed.
“The Chinese domestic market can’t absorb existing supply, much less additional amounts,” said Derek Scissors, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute think tank.
He expects Beijing could follow its playbook of making concessions to the U.S., dump products on other countries, subsidize loss-making firms and let other businesses die. Diverting goods to other countries would likely increase local trade barriers for China, while subsidies would exacerbate debt and deflationary pressures at home, Scissors said.
China has made boosting consumption its priority this year and has expanded subsidies for a consumer trade-in program focused on home appliances. Tsinghua University professor Li Daokui told CNBC’s “The China Connection” Thursday that he expected measures to boost consumption would be announced “within 10 days.”

Hard to replace

While the U.S. government has strived over the last several years to encourage manufacturers to build factories in the country, especially in the high-tech sector, businesses and analysts said it won’t be easy to develop those facilities and find experienced workers.
“We cannot obtain comparable equipment from sources in the U.S.,” Ford said in a U.S. tariff exemption request last month for a manufacturing tool used to make its electric-vehicle battery cells. “A U.S. supplier would not have the specific experience with the handling and heating process.”
Tesla and other major corporations have also filed similar requests for exclusion from U.S. tariffs.
A large chunk of goods can mostly be sourced from China alone. For 36% of U.S. imports from China, more than 70% can only come from suppliers based in the Asian country, Goldman Sachs analysts said this week. They said that indicates it will be hard for U.S. importers to find alternatives, despite new tariffs.
On the other hand, just 10% of Chinese imports from the U.S. rely on American suppliers, the report said.
The world’s second-largest economy has also sought to move into higher-end manufacturing. In addition to apparel and footwear, the U.S. relies on China for computers, machinery, home appliances and electronics, Allianz Research said last week.

Diversification

China was the second-largest supplier of U.S. goods in 2024, with imports from China rising by 2.8% to $438.95 billion last year, according to U.S. Census Bureau data. Mexico climbed to first place starting in 2023, while U.S. imports from Vietnam — which has benefitted from re-routing of Chinese goods — more than doubled in 2024 from 2019, the data showed.
Several large Chinese textile companies have been moving some production to Southeast Asia, Green Willow Textile’s Zhao said.

As for his own company, “this year we are developing customers in Southeast Asia, Latin America, the Middle East and Europe in order to reduce our reliance on the U.S. market,” Zhao said, noting the company could not bear the cost of the additional tariffs given its already low net profit of 5% last year.
China’s trade with Southeast Asia has grown rapidly since 2019, making the region the country’s largest trading partner, followed by the European Union and then the U.S. in 2024, according to Chinese customs data.
Chinese President Xi Jinping is set to visit Vietnam on Monday and Tuesday, followed by a trip to Malaysia and Cambodia later in the week, state media said Friday, citing China’s foreign ministry.
“I suspect that we will have a bit of a whack-a-mole situation where there will be new rules coming to crack down on Chinese content in products that ultimately end up in the United States,” Deborah Elms, head of the Hinrich Foundation, said on CNBC’s “The China Connection” Thursday.
Trump on Wednesday paused plans for a sharp hike on tariffs for most countries, including in Southeast Asia, but not for China.
That pause has offered a brief relief to people like Steve Greenspon, CEO of Illinois-based houseware company Honey-Can-Do International, whose company has moved more production from China to Vietnam since Trump’s first term.
“The pause allows us to continue with business as usual outside of China, but we cannot make any long term plans,” said Greenspon. “It’s hard to know how to pivot as we don’t know what will happen in 90 days.”
The economic realities could push the U.S. and China toward a deal, some analysts predict.
Gary Dvorchak, managing director at Blueshirt Group, pointed out Thursday that the latest tariffs have only been announced in the last several days and he expects ratcheting up of duties is likely posturing ahead of a deal — potentially as soon in the next few days.
Despite aggressive rhetoric, he thinks both countries have much to lose if the tariffs are made permanent. To have the U.S. cut off from Chinese goods would plunge China into a deeper depression, he said. More

As stocks soared on news of the tariff pause, hedge funds were forced to buy back their borrowed stocks rapidly in order to limit their losses.
With this artificial buying force pushing it higher, the S&P 500 ended Wednesday’s session with its third-biggest gain since World War II.

A trader works on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange during afternoon trading on April 9, 2025 in New York. 
Angela Weiss | Afp | Getty Images

A massive number of hedge fund short sellers rushed to close out their positions during Wednesday afternoon’s sudden surge in stocks, turning a stunning rally into one for the history books.
Traders — betting on share price declines — had piled on a record number of short bets against U.S. stocks ahead of Wednesday as President Donald Trump initially rolled out steeper-than-expected tariffs.

In order to sell short, hedge funds borrow the security they’re betting against from a bank and sell it. Then as the security decreases in price from where they sold it, they buy it back more cheaply and return it to the bank, profiting from the difference.
But sometimes that can backfire.
As stocks soared on news of the tariff pause, hedge funds were forced to buy back their borrowed stocks rapidly in order to limit their losses, a Wall Street phenomenon known as a short squeeze. With this artificial buying force pushing it higher, the S&P 500 ended up with its third-biggest gain since World War II.
Coming into Wednesday, short positioning was almost twice as much as the size seen in the first quarter of 2020 amid the onset of the Covid pandemic, according to Bank of America. As funds ran to cover, a basket of the most shorted stocks surged by 12.5% on Wednesday, according to Goldman Sachs, pulling off a larger jump than the S&P 500’s 9.5% gain.
And a whopping 30 billion shares traded on U.S. exchanges during the session, marking the heaviest volume day on record, according to Nasdaq and FactSet data going back 18 years.

“You can’t catch a move. When you see someone short covering, the exit doors become so small because of these crowded trades,” said Jeff Kilburg, KKM Financial CEO and CIO. “We live in a world where there’s more and more twitchiness to the marketplace, there’s more and more paranoia.”

Stock chart icon

Of course, there were real buyers, too. Long-only funds bought a record amount of tech stocks during the session, especially the last three hours of the day, according to data from Bank of America.
But traders credit the shorts running for cover for the magnitude of the move.
“The pain on the short side is palpable; the whipsaw we have witnessed the past few weeks is extreme,” Oppenheimer’s trading desk said in a note. “What we saw in tech on that rise was obviously covering but more so real buyers adding on to higher quality semis.”
Thin liquidity also played a role in Wednesday’s monster moves. The size of stock futures (CME E-Mini S&P 500 Futures) one can trade with the click of your mouse dropped to an all-time low of $2 million on Monday, according to Goldman Sachs data. Drastically thin markets tends to fuel outsized price swings. 
Markets were pulling back Thursday as investors realized the economy is still in danger from super-high China tariffs and the uncertainty that daily negotiations with other countries will bring over the next three months.
There are still big short positions left in the market, traders said.
That could fuel things again, if the market starts to rally again.
“The desk view is that short covering is far from over,” Bank of America’s trading desk said in a note. “Our reasoning is that the market can’t de-risk a short in less than 3 hours which provided 20%+ SPX Index downside & major reduction in NET LEVERAGE over 7 seven weeks.”
“No shot it cleared in less than 3 hours,” Bank of America said.
Get Your Ticket to Pro LIVE
Join us at the New York Stock Exchange!Uncertain markets? Gain an edge with CNBC Pro LIVE, an exclusive, inaugural event at the historic New York Stock Exchange.
In today’s dynamic financial landscape, access to expert insights is paramount. As a CNBC Pro subscriber, we invite you to join us for our first exclusive, in-person CNBC Pro LIVE event at the iconic NYSE on Thursday, June 12.
Join interactive Pro clinics led by our Pros Carter Worth, Dan Niles and Dan Ives, with a special edition of Pro Talks with Tom Lee. You’ll also get the opportunity to network with CNBC experts, talent and other Pro subscribers during an exciting cocktail hour on the legendary trading floor. Tickets are limited!

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

Economists expect that tariffs will lead to higher prices for consumers.
The price impact will be noticeable by summer, economists said.
Food prices will be among the early indicators, then physical goods, they said.
President Donald Trump may change course regarding policy, however.

People shop at a grocery store in Manhattan on April 1, 2025, in New York City.
Spencer Platt | Getty Images

The impact of President Donald Trump’s tariff agenda and resulting trade war will translate to higher consumer prices by summer, economists said.
“I suspect by May — certainly by June, July — the inflation statistics will look pretty ugly,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s.

Tariffs are a tax on imports, paid by U.S. businesses. Importers pass on at least some of those higher costs to consumers, economists said.

While economists debate whether tariffs will be a one-time price shock or something more persistent, there’s little argument consumers’ wallets will take a hit.
Consumers will lose $4,400 of purchasing power in the “short run,” according to a Yale Budget Lab analysis of tariff policy announced through Wednesday. (It doesn’t specify a timeframe.)

‘Darkly ironic’ tariff impact

Federal inflation data doesn’t yet show much tariff impact, economists said.
In fact, in a “darkly ironic” way, the specter of a global trade war may have had a “positive” impact on inflation in March, Zandi said. Oil prices have throttled back amid fears of a global recession (and a resulting dip in oil demand), a dynamic that has filtered through to lower energy prices, he said.

“I think it’ll take some time for the inflationary shock to work its way into the system,” said Preston Caldwell, chief U.S. economist at Morningstar. “At first, [inflation data] might look better than it will be eventually.”

But consumers will start to see noticeably higher prices by May, if the president keeps tariff policy in place, said Thomas Ryan, an economist at Capital Economics.
“Price increases take time to filter through the supply chain (starting with producers, then retailers/wholesalers, and finally consumers),” Ryan wrote in an e-mail.
Capital Economics expects the consumer price index to peak around 4% in 2025, up from 2.4% in March. That peak would be roughly double what the Federal Reserve aims for over the long term.

Food is first, then physical goods

Food will likely be among the first categories to see prices rise, Zandi said.
Because many food products are perishable, grocers can’t hold on to supply for very long. That speeds up the pass-through of higher costs to consumers, he said.
By comparison, other retailers can sell old inventory sitting in their warehouses that hadn’t been subject to tariffs, economists said. That dynamic would delay the price impact for consumers, economists said.
More from Personal Finance:Here’s the inflation breakdown for March 2025 — in one chartThis tax strategy is a ‘silver lining’ amid tariff volatilityWhy the stock market hates tariffs and trade wars
Most physical goods, such as vehicles, consumer electronics, clothing and furniture, are expected to be pricier by Memorial Day, Zandi said.
Additionally, retailers and wholesalers “won’t want to do this all at once,” Ryan said.
They’ll likely sprinkle in higher prices over time to blunt backlash from consumers, Ryan said. Consumer prices “will reflect more of the true impact of tariffs” in May and beyond, he said.

There’s also the possibility that some companies may try to front-run the impact of tariffs by raising prices now, in anticipation of higher costs, Ryan said.
It would be a gamble for companies to do that, though, Caldwell said.
“Any company that kind of sticks its neck out first and increases prices will probably be subject to political boycotts and unfavorable attention,” he said. “I think companies will move pretty slowly at first.”

Trump may change course

There’s ample uncertainty regarding the ultimate scope of President Trump’s tariff policy, however, economists said.
Trump on Wednesday backed down from imposing steep tariffs on dozens of trading partners. Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said Thursday that 15 countries had made trade deal offers.
For now, all U.S. trading partners still face a 10% universal tariff on imports. The exceptions — Canada, China and Mexico — face separate levies. Trump put a total 145% levy on goods from China, for example, which constitutes a “de facto embargo,” said Caldwell.
Trump has also imposed product-specific tariffs on aluminum, steel, and automobiles and car parts.
There’s the possibility that prices for services like travel and entertainment could fall if other nations retaliate with their own trade restrictions or if there’s less foreign demand, Zandi said.
There was some evidence of that in March: “Steep” declines in hotel prices and airline fares in the March CPI data partly reflect the recent drop in tourist visits to the U.S., particularly from Canada, according to a Thursday note from Capital Economics. More

The annual consumer price index fell to 2.4% in March, down from 2.8% in February, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
President Donald Trump’s tariff agenda and the prospect of a global trade war threaten to reverse progress in coming months.

David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Inflation throttled back in March, largely on lower gasoline prices — but tariffs threaten to reverse that downward trend in coming months while trouble also lurks in certain categories like groceries, economists said.
The consumer price index rose 2.4% for the 12 months ended in March, down from 2.8% in February, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Thursday, indicating that inflation decelerated.

Additionally, the “core” CPI — a measure that strips out food and energy prices, which can be volatile — fell from 3.1% to 2.8%, the lowest level since March 2021. Economists prefer to look at core inflation to determine underlying inflation trends.

However, there are trouble spots like grocery prices and the Trump administration’s economic policy poses a significant headwind, economists said.
“It would have been a really good day,” Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s, said of the CPI report. “But because of the tariffs, the trade war, it means nothing.”
He added that “it doesn’t reflect any of the tariffs being slapped on products around the world, particularly those coming from China.”
The consumer price index is a widely used measure of inflation that tracks how quickly prices rise or fall for a basket of goods and services, from haircuts to coffee, clothing and concert tickets.

CPI inflation has declined significantly from its pandemic-era high of 9.1% in June 2022.
However, it remains above the Federal Reserve’s target. The central bank aims for an annual rate around 2% over the long term.

Why tariffs raise prices

Tariffs, a tax paid by U.S. importers, add costs for businesses that ultimately get passed to consumers, economists said. Steel tariffs, for example, could make steel-intensive items like cars, homes and machinery more expensive, they said.
Tariffs “are going to be the main driver of inflation surging this year,” said Thomas Ryan, an economist at Capital Economics.

President Donald Trump on Wednesday backed down from imposing steep tariffs on dozens of trading partners, following a stock market rout and surging U.S. government bond yields, which push down bond prices.
While Trump delayed country-specific tariffs for 90 days, all U.S. trading partners still face a 10% universal tariff on all imports. The exceptions — Canada, China and Mexico — face separate levies, however.
More from Personal Finance:Why the stock market hates tariffs and trade warsWhy Fed chair wears purple ties — ‘we are nonpolitical’Don’t miss these tax strategies during the tariff sell-off
Imports from China are subject to a 145% tariff, for example. In response, China put 84% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports. Trump has also imposed product-specific tariffs on aluminum, steel, and automobiles and car parts.
“Many products that the U.S. imports are predominantly from China. Smartphones [73%], laptops [78%], video game consoles [87%], toys [77%], and also antibiotics for U.S. livestock production,” Wendong Zhang, professor of applied economics and policy at Cornell University, wrote in an email to CNBC. “Resourcing from other countries will take time and result in much higher costs.”

Trump’s tariff policy will push the U.S. inflation rate to a peak around 4% by the end of 2025, Capital Economics estimates. That’s roughly double the Fed’s long-term target.
Vanguard Group projects a similar rise in inflation, particularly for goods prices. The money manager forecasts a 4% full-year 2025 inflation rate due to U.S. tariffs and retaliation by other nations.
Economists question whether the inflation impact will be short-lived (akin to a one-time price shock) or something more persistent.

Housing disinflation ‘set in stone’

Inflation was expected to continue its gradual decline in 2025 absent Trump’s economic policy, said Preston Caldwell, chief U.S. economist at Morningstar.
The trajectory of housing inflation is a major driver of that disinflationary trend, he said.

Shelter is the largest component of the consumer price index, and therefore has an outsized impact on the direction of inflation. Annual shelter inflation eased to 4% in March, the smallest 12-month increase since November 2021, according to the BLS.
Housing disinflation is “something that’s sort of set in stone, at this point,” Caldwell said.

Gasoline prices tumble

Gasoline prices also dropped in March. Prices at the pump declined 6.3% from February to March, after an adjustment for seasonal factors, according to the BLS.
Seasonally adjusted prices are down about 10% over the past year.

Oil prices plunged in early April, tied to fears of a global recession crimping demand, and gasoline prices are expected to throttle back further if the trend continues, economists said.

Groceries are a trouble spot

Trouble spots do remain, however.
Food prices were “the significant blemish” in the CPI report, particularly those for groceries, Zandi said.
According to BLS data, grocery prices rose 0.5% in the month from February to March, up from 0% the prior month, which is higher than the roughly 0.2% monthly move that economists say is needed to reach the Fed’s annual inflation target. 
Egg prices jumped about 6% for the month and are up 60% in the past year, according to BLS data. That jump is largely attributable to a U.S. outbreak of bird flu, which has killed millions of egg-laying chickens and crimped egg supply.

Prices for instant coffee have also surged, about 13%. Weather patterns like droughts fueled by climate change have disrupted major coffee growers like Brazil, reducing supplies of coffee beans.
However, the broad increase in grocery prices isn’t attributable to one factor or agricultural product, Zandi said.
It’s “worrisome” that food inflation has picked up even as diesel prices have fallen, a dynamic that would generally serve to hold down inflation due to lower transportation costs to grocery shelves, Zandi said.
“This inflation report had some highlights, and continues to have problem areas in food prices and energy components like electricity and natural gas,” Greg McBride, chief financial analyst at Bankrate, wrote Thursday morning. “But all this is looking in the rear-view mirror. With both inflation and the overall economy, uncertainty abounds about what might be lurking around the bend.”

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO More

As stocks plunged and even the safe haven of U.S. Treasurys began selling off, investors, executives and analysts began to fret that a core assumption about the Trump presidency may no longer apply.
Amid the market carnage, the world’s most powerful person showed that he had a greater tolerance for inflicting pain on investors than anyone had anticipated.

Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, testifies during the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee hearing titled Annual Oversight of Wall Street Firms, in the Hart Building on Dec. 6, 2023.
Tom Williams | Cq-roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images

With each passing day since President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariff announcement last week, a growing sense of unease had begun to pervade Wall Street.
As stocks plunged and even the safe haven of U.S. Treasurys were selling off, investors, executives and analysts started to fret that a core assumption from the first Trump presidency may no longer apply.

Amid the market carnage, the world’s most powerful person showed that he had a greater tolerance for inflicting pain on investors than anyone had anticipated. Time after time, he and his deputies denied that the administration would back off from the highest American tariff regime in a century, sometimes inferring that Wall Street would have to suffer so that Main Street could thrive.
“It goes without saying that last week’s price action was shocking to see as the market has begun to rewrite completely its sense for what a second Trump presidency means for the economy,” said R. Scott Siefers, a Piper Sandler analyst, earlier this week.
So it came as a huge relief to investors when, minutes after 1 p.m. ET on Wednesday, Trump relented by rolling back the highest tariffs on most countries except China, sparking the biggest one-day stock rally for the S&P 500 since the depths of the 2008 financial crisis.
Despite a presidency in which Trump has tested the limits of executive power — bulldozing federal agencies and laying off thousands of government employees, for example — the episode shows that the market, and by proxy Wall Street statesmen like JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon who can explain its gyrations, are still guardrails on the administration.
Later Wednesday afternoon, Trump told reporters that he pivoted after seeing how markets were reacting — getting “yippy,” in his words — and took to heart Dimon’s warning in a morning TV appearance that the policy was pushing the U.S. economy into recession.

Dimon’s appearance in a Fox news interview was planned more than a month ago and wasn’t a last-minute decision meant to sway the president, according to a person with knowledge of the JPMorgan CEO’s schedule.

Bond vigilantes

Of particular concern to Trump and his advisors was the fear that his tariff policy could incite a global financial crisis after yields on U.S. government bonds jumped, according to the New York Times, which cited people with knowledge of the president’s thinking.
“The stock market, bond market and capital markets are, to a degree, a governor on the actions that are taken,” said Mike Mayo, the Wells Fargo bank analyst. “You were hearing about parts of the bond market that were under stress, trades that were blowing up. You push so hard, but you don’t want it to break.”
Typically, investors turn to Treasurys in times of uncertainty, but the sell-off indicated that institutional or sovereign players were dumping holdings, leading to higher borrowing costs for the government, businesses and consumers. That could’ve forced the Federal Reserve to intervene, as it has in previous crises, by slashing rates or acting as buyer of last resort for government bonds.

“The bond market was anticipating a real crisis,” Ed Yardeni, the veteran markets analyst, told CNBC’s Scott Wapner on Wednesday.
Yardeni said it was the “bond vigilantes” that got Trump’s attention; the term refers to the idea that investors can act as a type of enforcer on government behavior viewed as making it less likely they’ll get repaid.
Amid the market churn, Wall Street executives had reportedly worried that they didn’t have the influence they did under the first Trump administration, when ex-Goldman partners including Steven Mnuchin and Gary Cohn could be relied upon.
But this last week also showed investors that, in his mission to remake the global order of the past century, Trump is willing to take his adversarial approach with trading partners and the larger economy to the knife’s edge, which only invites more volatility.

‘Chaos discount’

Banks, closely watched for the central role they play in lending to corporations and consumers, entered the year with great enthusiasm after Trump’s election.
The setup was as promising as it had been in decades, according to Mayo and other analysts: A strengthening economy would help boost loan demand, while lower interest rates, deregulation and the return of deals activity including mergers and IPO listings would only add fuel to the fire.
Instead, by the last weekend, bank stocks were in a bear market, having given up all their gains since the election, on fears that Trump was steering the economy to recession. Amid the tumult, it’s likely that reports will show that deal-making slowed as corporate leaders adopt a wait-and-see attitude.  
“The chaos discount, we call it,” said Brian Foran, an analyst at Truist bank.
Foran and other analysts said the Trump factor made it difficult to forecast whether the economy was heading for recession, which banks would be winners and losers in a trade war and, therefore, how much they should be worth.
Investors will next focus on JPMorgan, which kicks off the first-quarter earnings season on Friday. They will likely press Dimon and other CEOs about the health of the economy and how consumers and businesses are faring during tariff negotiations.
Wednesday’s reprieve could prove short lived. The day after Trump’s announcement and the historic rally, markets continued to decline. There remains a trade dispute between the world’s two largest economies, each with their own needs and vulnerabilities, and an unclear path to compromise. And universal tariffs of 10% are still in effect.
“We got close, and that’s a very uncomfortable place to be,” Mohamed El-Erian, chief economic advisor of Allianz, the Munich-based asset manager, said Wednesday on CNBC, referring to a crisis in which the Fed would need to step in.  
“We don’t want to get there again,” he said. “The more you get to that point repeatedly, the higher the risk that you’re going to cross it.” More

Victoria Harbour is Hong Kong’s most glamorous body of water. But Rambler Channel is where the free port’s work is done. The quays along its banks extend over more than 7km. Gantry cranes, rail-mounted or rubber-tyred, serve as many as 24 vessels at a time. Last year, the surrounding port handled over 10m of the standardised containers that carry goods across the world, parcelling globalisation up into metal boxes, in green, blue and red. More